AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Clinical Reference Dosimetry of High-Energy Photon and Electron Beams

Similar documents
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 4, FALL 2003

PMP. Use of Cylindrical Chambers as Substitutes for Parallel- Plate Chambers in Low-Energy Electron Dosimetry. Original Article.

On the impact of ICRU report 90 recommendations on k Q factors for high-energy photon beams

INTRODUCTION. Material and Methods

Applications of Monte Carlo simulations to radiation dosimetry

How accurately can we measure dose clinically? Accurate clinical dosimetry. Dosimetric accuracy requirement

Dosimetric characterization of surface applicators for use with the Xoft ebx system

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISION FOR RADIATION QUALITY IN HIGH ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS

Plan-Specific Correction Factors for Small- Volume Ion Chamber Dosimetry in Modulated Treatments on a Varian Trilogy

Implantable MOSFET dosimeter response to 192 Ir HDR radiation

AAPM TG178: Towards the Recommendation of a Standard Dosimetry Protocol for Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation

Energy response of EBT3 radiochromic films: implications for dosimetry in kilovoltage range

How accurately can we measure dose clinically? Dosimetric accuracy requirement. Accurate Clinical dosimetry. Part I: Fundamentals and Issues

Beam Quality Effects in Nonstandard Fields of the Varian TrueBeam

Topics covered 7/21/2014. Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy

Study of a spherical phantom for Gamma knife dosimetry

On the use of bolus for pacemaker dose measurement and reduction in radiation therapy

Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry

TREATMENT PLANNING: CLINICAL ELECTRONS John A. Antolak, Ph.D. Prepared for the AAPM Therapy Physics Review Course Austin, TX July 19 20, 2014 PURPOSE

Semiflex 3D. Always perfectly oriented. 3D Thimble Ionization Chamber for Relative and Absolute Dosimetry

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS IN PERCENTAGE DEPTH DOSE (PDD) DETERMINATION AT THE EXTENDED DISTANCES *

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

4 Essentials of CK Physics 8/2/2012. SRS using the CyberKnife. Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest

An Independent Audit and Analysis of Small Field Dosimetry Quality Assurance. David Followill IROC Houston QA Center

8/2/2017. Objectives. Disclosures. Clinical Implementation of an MR-Guided Treatment Unit

Assessment of Dosimetric Functions of An Equinox 100 Telecobalt Machine

IAEA/WHO NETWORK OF SECONDARY STANDARD DOSIMETRY LABORATORIES

MAMMOSITE BRACHYTHERAPY DOSIMETRY EFFECT OF CONTRAST AND AIR INTERFACE ON SKIN DOSE. A RESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

Semiflex 3D. Always perfectly oriented. 3D Thimble Ionization Chamber for Relative and Absolute Dosimetry

Basic dosimetric data for treatment planning system

Detector comparison for small field output factor measurements with flattening filter free photon beams

Comparative Study of Absorbed Doses in Different Phantom Materials and Fabrication of a Suitable Phantom

Small field diode dosimetry

Small Field Dosimetry: Overview of AAPM TG-155 and the IAEA-AAPM Code of Practice (Therapy)

Can we hit the target? Can we put the dose where we want it? Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Effect of scattered radiation in the total body irradiation technique: evaluation of the spoiler and wall dose component in the depthdose distribution

Dose distribution and dosimetry parameters calculation of MED3633 palladium-103 source in water phantom using MCNP

Reference Photon Dosimetry Data for the Siemens Primus Linear Accelerator: Preliminary Results for Depth Dose and Output Factor

Radiochromic film dosimetry in water phantoms

Dosimetric characterization with 62 MeV protons of a silicon segmented detector for 2D dose verifications in radiotherapy

SRS/SBRT Errors and Causes

TLD as a tool for remote verification of output for radiotherapy beams: 25 years of experience

Comparison of dosimetry parameters of two commercially available Iodine brachytherapy seeds using Monte Carlo calculations

TESTICULAR DOSES IN IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER

Electron therapy Class 3: Clinical procedures

An anthropomorphic head phantom with a BANG polymer gel insert for dosimetric evaluation of IMRT treatment delivery

Assessment of a three-dimensional (3D) water scanning system for beam commissioning and measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit

Much of what we will say

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY ROC 7040: RADIATION DOSIMETRY WINTER 2017

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Patient Specific QA

Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy

PROCEDURE FOR ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER DETERMINATION IN HIGH ENERGY PHOTON AND ELECTRON BEAMS BY FERROUS SULPHATE DOSIMETER AT INMRI-ENEA

Normal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using orthogonal MV and MV-CBCT

Data Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials. July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Small Field Dosimetry: Overview of AAPM TG-155 and the IAEA-AAPM Code of Practice (Therapy) What is a Small Field? Indra J. Das/ Small Fields (Page-1)

PRECISE DOSIMETRY OF SMALL PHOTON BEAMS COLLIMATED BY AN ADD-ON DYNAMIC MICRO-MULTILEAVES COLLIMATOR.

LONG TERM STABILITY OF THE PERFORMANCE OF A CLINICAL LINEAR ACCELERATOR AND Z-SCORE ASSESSEMENT FOR ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER QUANTITY

IAEA/AAPM Code of Practice for the Dosimetry of Static Small Photon Fields. Jan Seuntjens McGill University Montréal, Canada

Traceability and absorbed dose standards for small fields, IMRT and helical tomotherapy

EDITORIAL NOTE. factor, which has been used instead of the chamber factor N D

Assessment of variation of wedge factor with depth, field size and SSD for Neptun 10PC Linac in Mashhad Imam Reza Hospital

Learning Objectives. Clinically operating proton therapy facilities. Overview of Quality Assurance in Proton Therapy. Omar Zeidan

Diode Dosimetric Characteristics Assessment for In-Vivo Dosimetry in Radiotherapy Treatment

Dosimetry and QA of proton and heavier ion beams

Calibration of dosimeters for small mega voltage photon fields at ARPANSA

Problems and Shortcomings of the RPC Remote Monitoring Program of Institutions Dosimetry Data

AAPM Administrative Policy: Joint AAPM/IROC Houston Registry of Brachytherapy Sources Complying with AAPM Dosimetric Prerequisites

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 6, NUMBER 2, SPRING 2005

Dosimetric characterization with 62 MeV protons of a silicon segmented detector for 2D dose verifications in radiotherapy

The clinical use of OSLD

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Uncertainties of in vivo Dosimetry Using Semiconductors. I. Introduction. 2. Methodology

Diode calibration for dose determination in total body irradiation

A new geometric and mechanical verification device for medical LINACs

8/2/2018. Disclosures. In ICRU91: SRT = {SBRT/SABR, SRS}

IAEA/AAPM code of practice for the dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy

Manik Aima, Larry A. DeWerd, Wesley S. Culberson

Patient-specific quality assurance for intracranial cases in robotic radiosurgery system

Verification of treatment planning system parameters in tomotherapy using EBT Radiochromic Film

Spinal Cord Doses in Palliative Lung Radiotherapy Schedules

Active Scanning Beam 3 Checking Delivery/Dosimetry

Implementation of full/half bowtie filter models in a commercial treatment planning system for kilovoltage cone-beam CT dose estimations

Analysis of 6 MV Energy Quality File Index using Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) and Tissue Phantom Ratio (TPR) Methods on Linac Siemens and Electa

Ali S. Meigooni, Kai Dou, Navid J. Meigooni, Michael Gnaster, Shahid Awan, Sharifeh Dini, and Ellis L. Johnson

Standard calibration of ionization chambers used in radiation therapy dosimetry and evaluation of uncertainties

Multilayer Gafchromic film detectors for breast skin dose determination in vivo

Application(s) of Alanine

Characteristics Analysis of High Energy External Radiotherapy Beams in Water

DOSE MEASUREMENTS IN TELETHERAPY USING THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS

A comparison of dose distributions measured with two types of radiochromic film dosimeter MD55 and EBT for proton beam of energy 175 MeV

Determining rectal dose through cervical cancer radiotherapy by 9 MV photon beam using TLD and XR type T GAFCHROMIC Film

Abstract: A National Project for the in-vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy: first results

Application of MCNP4C Monte Carlo code in radiation dosimetry in heterogeneous phantom

S. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned

Report to the 18 th Meeting of the CCRI(I), May 2007 Recent Activities in Measurement Standards and Dosimetry at METAS,

Accounting for Imaging Dose

PHYS 383: Applications of physics in medicine (offered at the University of Waterloo from Jan 2015)

ROPES eye plaque dosimetry: commissioning and verification of an ophthalmic brachytherapy treatment planning system

Quality Assurance of Helical Tomotherapy Machines

Transcription:

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Clinical Reference Dosimetry of High-Energy Photon and Electron Beams Peter R. Almond, Brown Cancer Center,Louisville, KY 40202 Peter J. Biggs, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 B.M. Coursey, Ionizing Radiation Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 W.F. Hanson, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030 M.Saiful Huq, Kimmel Cancer Center of Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Ravinder Nath, Yale Univ School of Medicine,New Haven, CT 06510 D.W.O. Rogers, Ionizing Radiation Standards, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa K1A OR6, Canada Developed by TG 51 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the AAPM. As published in Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 Abstract This is the figures from TG-51 in a large scale and colour format. Note the postscript and/or pdf versions available at http://www.irs.inms.nrc.ca/inms/irs/tg51 figures/tg51 figures.html 1

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 2 %depth ionization 100 90 80 70 60 d max II %dd(10) I A a) dose II I 50 B b) I 100 80 60 40 20 50 0 5 10 15 20 depth /cm 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 depth / cm 0 Figure 1: Effect of shifting depth-ionization data measured with cylindrical chambers upstream by 0.6 r cav for photon beams (panel a) and 0.5 r cav for electron beams (panel b) (with r cav = 1.0 cm). The raw data are shown by curve I (long dashes) in both cases and the shifted data, which are taken as the depth-ionization curve, are shown by curve II (solid line). The value of the % ionization at point A (10 cm depth) in the photon beam gives %dd(10) and the depth at point B (solid curve, 50% ionization) in the electron beam gives I 50 from which can be determined (see section VIII.C). For the photon beams, curve II is effectively the percentage depth-dose curve. For the electron beams, curve II must be further corrected (see section X.D) to obtain the percentage depth-dose curve shown (short dashes - but this is not needed for application of the protocol).

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 3 110 100 d ref = 0.6 0.1 cm % depth dose dd_r50_dref 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 d max 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 depth /cm Figure 2: is defined as the depth, in cm, at which the absorbed dose falls to 50% of its maximum value in a 10 10 cm 2 ( 20 20 cm 2 for > 8.5 cm) electron beam at an SSD of 100 cm. The depth for clinical reference dosimetry is d ref = 0.6 0.1 cm, in the same sized beam at an SSD between 90 and 110 cm. Note that for low-energy beams, d ref is usually at d max.

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 4 SSD SAD 10 cm 10x10 10 cm 10x10 SSD Setup SAD Setup Figure 3: Schematic of the SSD or SAD setups which may be used for photon beam reference dosimetry. In both cases the ion chamber is at a water equivalent depth of 10 cm in the water phantom. The actual value of SSD or SAD is that most useful in the clinic (expected to be about 100 cm).

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 5 A12,A1,PR05,PR05P,IC 5,IC 10 0.99 PTW N30002 k Q 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 PR06C PTW N30001,31003 NE2571, 2577 2505/3A, 30004 NE2561 0.94 kq_photon NE2581 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 %dd(10) X Figure 4: Values of k Q at 10 cm depth in accelerator photon beams as a function of %dd(10) x for cylindrical ion chambers commonly used for clinical reference dosimetry. When values were the same within 0.1%, only one curve is shown. Explicit values are given in Table I, as is a list of equivalent chambers. For 60 Co beams, k Q = 0.

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 6 Exradin A1,PR05,PR05P 1.03 NE2505.3A NE2571 N30001 PR06C/G NE2577 N30004 k at d ref 1.02 1.01 A12 N30002 IC10/5 0.9905+0.071e ( R50/3.67) N31003 kr50.prime NE2561 N23331 NE2581 PR06C/G 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /cm Figure 5: Calculated values of k R 50 at d ref as a function of for several common cylindrical ion chambers. These values can be used with Eq.(6), (with a measured value of Pgr Q and a k ecal value from Table III) to determine the absorbed dose to water at the reference depth of d ref = 0.6 0.1 cm.

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 7 k at d ref 1.06 1.05 1.04 1.03 1.02 Markus NACP Exradin P11 Holt PTB/Roos Attix 1.2239 0.145( ) 0.214 1.01 Capintec 0.99 kr50.prime_pp 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /cm Figure 6: Calculated values of k at d ref as a function of for several common plane-parallel chambers. Note that the values for the 5 well-guarded chambers lie on the same line in the figure. These values can be used with Eq.(6) (with P Q gr = 1.0) to determine the absorbed dose to water at the reference depth of d ref = 0.6 0.1 cm.

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 8 NE2505.3A NE2571 NE2577 N30001 NE2581 PR06C/G 0.99 NE2561 N23331 k at d ref 0.98 0.97 N30004 N30002 A12 IC10/5 N31003 0.96 Exradin A1,PR05,PR05P 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /cm Figure 7: Calculated values of k R 50 at d ref for high-energy electron beams, as a function of for cylindrical ion chambers. These values can be used with Eq.(6), (with a measured value of Pgr Q and a k ecal value from Table III) to determine the absorbed dose to water at the reference depth of d ref = 0.6 0.1 cm.

AAPM s TG 51 Protocol for Reference Dosimetry: Med Phys 26 (1999) 1847 1870 page 9 0.99 k at d ref 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 Capintec Holt Exradin P11 Markus PTB/Roos Attix NACP 1.2239 0.145( ) 0.214 kr50.prime_pp.high 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /cm Figure 8: Calculated values of k R 50 at d ref for high-energy electron beams, as a function of for plane-parallel chambers. Note that the values for the 5 well-guarded chambers lie on the same line in the figure. These values can be used with Eq.(6) (with Pgr Q = 1.0 and a k ecal value from Table II) to determine the absorbed dose to water at the reference depth of d ref = 0.6 0.1 cm.