Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids and Genetically Modified rganism in Honey Allocation, European Legislation and Regulation Intertek Food & Agri Services 1 San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico March 19-25 Director Testing & Analytics www.intertek.com
Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honey Current Situation C H 3 H CH 3 CH 2 H N 2 www.intertek.com
PAs and Toxicity Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PAs) can be found all over the world in almost every climatic region in Asteraceae, Boraginaceae and Fabaceae plant families PAs and their corresponding N-oxides can be transfered to honey from PA producing plants and have been related to toxic and carcinogenic effects H H H C H 3 H CH 3 H CH 3 H 3 C CH 3 H H H 3 C Me H CH 3 H CH 3 C H 3 H CH 3 CH 2 H N N N Lycopsamine (noncyclic monoester) Lasiocarpine (noncyclic diester) Seneciphylline (cyclic diester) 1 2 3 Increasing toxicological effect 3 www.intertek.com
International Activities Germany: Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, BfR Expert Group on Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Europe: European Food Safety Authority, EFSA EFSA pinion related to Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids as undesirable Substances in Animal Feeds Global: Codex Alimentarius Electronic Working Group DISCUSSIN PAPER N THE PRESENCE F PYRRLIZIDINE ALKALIDS (PAs) IN FD AND FEED AND CNSEQUENCES FR HUMAN HEALTH (Participants: National authorities, EU, Apimondia) Global: Joint FA/WH Expert Committee on Food Additives Recommendation for a revaluation of PAs by JECFA 4 www.intertek.com
Recommendation of BfR and EFSA Following the CT (Committee on Toxicology, UK) approach: 0.007 µg/kg bw/day regarded as tolerable! daily intake of 0.42 µg PA for a person of 60 kg! PA concentration in honey of 42 µg/kg considering a consumption of 10 g/day! requirement for a monitoring including further more products Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Germany, BfR Statement on analytics and toxicity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey, Aug. 11th, 2011. 5 www.intertek.com
Market Survey and EFSA Recommendation 50*) for adults, 60 kg body weight 10.7 µg/kg = average PA concentration from market survey Consumption [g] 20 10 3.8**) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Corresponding maximum PA content in honey [µg/kg] *) Maximum short-time daily consumption, 95th percentile **) Average daily consumption in Germany 6 www.intertek.com
Risk Assessment! Average consumption of honeys with different levels of PA concentrations does not result in an intake of more than 0.007 µg PA/kg bw/d.! Average consumption of honeys with high PA levels can result in an exceedance of the recommended limit only for children.! A high consumption of honeys with higher PA contents means an exceedance of the intake of 0.007 µg PA/kg bw/d. 7 www.intertek.com
Gentically Modified rganism European Legislation and Regulation 8 www.intertek.com
Legal Situation before September 6th, 2011 Honey is a pure natural product produced by bees. During their flight from flower to flower, the bees do not only gather nectar but also pollen whose grains get into the honey as well. If the pollen originates from a genetically modified (gm) plant, it can be detected in honey. EC 1829/2003 Genetically modified Food and Feed Honey, considered to be a product of animal origin, is not subject to the gmo regulation Does not apply to honey containing gm pollen, since it is neither containing, consisting of nor produced from GMs EC 1830/2003 Traceability and Labeling Labeling honey containing pollen of gm plants is generally not required according to the legal situation pollen from gm plants can be seen as an accidental, technically unavoidable intermixture for which GM labeling is not required (for this kind of intermixture the threshold value is 0.9%) 9 www.intertek.com
Legal Situation after September 6th, 2011 The European Court of Justice (CJEU or ECJ) decided: Honey containing pollen from genetically modified (gm) plants is categorized as food according to the European (EU) genetic engineering law (Regulations (EC) 1829/2003 and (EC) 1830/2003) and is therefore subject to authorization For further details please see: CJEU Judgement in Case C-442/09 and CJEU Press Release No 79/11 The consequences are: For gm plant pollen not approved for food in the EU, a zero tolerance rule is in force and results in the fact that honey containing such gm plant pollen is not marketable in the European Union. Honey is subject to mandatory labelling if it contains gm plant pollen which is authorized for food in the EU. No statutory transition period for the judgement of the ECJ 10 www.intertek.com
GM Testing on Honey No harmonized regulation or methodology for gmo testing on honey available! The German Federal ffice of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL) published a Guideline on sampling and analysis for the detection of pollen from genetically modified plants in honey ( http://www.bvl.bund.de/shareddocs/downloads/ 09_Untersuchungen/Guideline_pollen_honey.html) issued on November 14th, 2011. The aim of this guideline is to harmonize sampling and testing procedures to obtain comparable and reliable data. The document is addressed to authorities and private laboratories. It does not give any information on the criteria how to interprete zero tolerance and which threshold will be used to quantify authorised gm plant pollen in honey. The European Union Reference Laboratory for GM Food and Feed (EURL-GMFF) is also working on the development of gmo testing methods, but has not published any recommendation so far. 11 www.intertek.com
GM Testing on Honey Labelling in case of positive findings for authorised GM plant pollen in Honey: EU Commission and German Authorities recommend a general threshold of 0.9 % gm pollen related to the total pollen content for the labelling of honey in case of a detection of gmo approved for food in the EU => No binding Decision exists! The EU Commission and the German Federal Ministry proposed not to take any action by national authorities of EU member states as long as no harmonized method is available. 12 www.intertek.com
Honey relevant Sequences Identification Sheet Identification Sheet rape soya maize cotton P-35-S T-NS FMV a na a na a na a na T45; TPAS19/2* X - - - X - MS1, RF1, MS1xRF1*; MS1, RF2, MS1xRF2* 23-198, 23-18-27 (Laurical); Falcon GS40/90; Liberator L62 (phoe6/ac) MS8, RF3, MS8xRF3 A2704-12 356043; A5547-127 (LibertyLink); GU262 (LibertyLink) DAS 59122; Bt 176 (176; Maximer)*; T14; DAS 1507 GA 21 (Roundup Ready); MIR604 MN810; T25; 676, 678, 680; B16 (DLL25); DAS-06275-8; DBT418 (Bt-Xtra); DP 098140-6 3272; MIR 162 - - X X X - GT73; MN 89788 GT200 XY 235 MN 40-3-2 (Roundup ready soya) W62, W98 (LibertyLink); G94-1, G94-19, G- 168 (ptimum) Bt11; MN 863 (YieldGard); MN 88017; NK 603 (Roundup Ready) CBH-351 (Starlink); MIR 80100; MN 802; MN 809; MN 832; MS 3; MS 6 LLCotton25 MN15985; MN531 X - X MN88913 - X X X X X MN89034 MN1445 - - - MN87701 305423**; BPS-CV127-9** LY038** GHB614** 281-24-236 x 3006-210-23** Legend: a= authorized in the EU na = non-authorized in the EU *provided that the presence is adventitious and unavoidable, presence up to 0.9% is allowed; not commercialized ** cannot be detected by five genetic sequence screening, not known as relevant; single event spezific detection is required 13 www.intertek.com
PAs and GM: Allocation in Honey from Mexico 14 www.intertek.com
Allocation of PAs verall Allocation of PAs (N=13000) 17% 10% 6% 4% 21% [0] µg/kg [1-4] [5-10] [11-20] [21-50] 16% [51-100] [101-200] 12% 14% [>200] Mexico (N=2030) 5% 4% 4% 20% 39 µg/kg Average 33 µg/kg 12% 4930 µg/kg Max 2232 µg/kg 9 µg/kg Median 4 µg/kg 13% 22% 20% 15 www.intertek.com
PA Concentrations in Quarterly Study Periods 120 100 109 100 80 60 51.8 Median Mean 40 38.9 20 6.5 17.5 0 2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2010 Q1 2 2010 Q2 19 2010 Q3 13.9 18 26 9.9 5 2010 Q4 2011 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 19.6 5 2011 Q4 7.7 4 Mexico 16 www.intertek.com
Market Survey (N = 30) Mean values [µg/kg] Maximum values [µg/kg] 25 22.9 160 150 20 140 120 15 100 10 5 11.3 11.4 9.1 10.9 10.4 11.5 10.9 9.9 80 60 40 20 71 43 31 46 40 53 43 46 0 July 2009 Jan. 2010 April 2010 July 2010 ct. 2010 Jan. 2011 April 2011 July 2011 Jan. 2012 0 July 2009 Jan. 2010 April 2010 July 2010 ct. 2010 Jan. 2011 April 2011 July 2011 Jan. 2012 17 www.intertek.com
GM Testing on Honey Results Summary of GM Screening Results (>5000 samples) 18 www.intertek.com
GM Testing on Honey Results 19 www.intertek.com
Conclusion Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Honey! Data on toxicity of individual PAs and their relative potencies is still too limited to fix maximum limits! Various regional regulations to minimize the overall exposure to PAs showing genotoxic and carcinogenic effects! BfR (Germany) and EFSA (Europe) recommend a maximum daily intake of 0.007 µg/kg/bw (0.42 µg/kg for a person of 60 kg)! No limit will be defined by the German Authorities at the moment! The Industry should minimize the PA concentration in honey and in products containing pollen (food supplements) 20 www.intertek.com
Conclusion Genetically Modified rganism in Honey! Honey containing pollen from genetically modified (gm) plants is categorized as food according to the European (EU) genetic engineering law (Regulations (EC) 1829/2003 and (EC) 1830/2003) and is therefore subject to authorization! For gm plant pollen not approved for food in the EU, a zero tolerance rule is in force and results in the fact that honey containing such gm plant pollen is not marketable in the European Union.! Honey is subject to mandatory labelling if it contains gm plant pollen which is authorized for food in the EU.! No binding Decision exists! 21 www.intertek.com
Thank You for Your Attention! Reliable Services for Safe Food. Testing Inspection Certification Auditing utsourcing Advisory Quality Assurance 22 www.intertek.com