Abstract: Many blueberry growers in South Georgia have expressed interest about using humate

Similar documents
Understanding a Soil Report

Monitoring & Maintaining the ph and EC of the Root Environment. Bill Fonteno Horticultural Substrates Laboratory NC State University

TYPE: ORGANIC NUTRIENTS CODE: BF4 - GRANULE (JAIVIZYME)

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Soil Prescription - Sample 1

Controlled Release Fertilizer Evaluations 1998

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Soils and Soil Fertility Management

Agronomy 365 Exam I Spring 2002

FOLIAR NUTRITION, BIOSTIMULANTS, SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, SURFACTANTS, ADYUVANTS, WETTING AGENTS, AND SOIL AMENDMENT TECNOLOGY

Keywords: hydroponic, media, soilless culture, zeolite

Soil Composition. Air

Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels. Bruce Hoskins University of Maine anlab.umesci.maine.edu

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 3: Fertilizers

Fertilization Programming

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

Tim Mundorf Fall 2016

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

INTERPRETING SOIL & LEAF ANALYSIS

Understanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018

Patented ECO-FERTILIZER. Soil AMENDMENT. Nitrogen REPLACEMENT

HUMIC GROWTH SOLUTIONS, INC. Organic Biostimulants, Made in the USA

USERS GUIDE for the. report

Soil Conditions Favoring Micronutrient Deficiencies and Responses in 2001

Soil Program Recommendation

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

FACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation

Quick Tips for Nutrient Management in Washington Berry Crops. Lisa Wasko DeVetter Assistant Professor, Small Fruit Horticulture March 16, 2016

COMPUTATION & PREPARATION OF NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS. Principles, properties & preparation of nutrient solutions

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

Understanding your results Acidity... 3 Aluminium... 3 Base saturation... 3 Boron... 4 Bulk density... 4 Calcium... 4 Cations...

Nutrient Management of Container Nursery Crops

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Trends in Turf Nutrition: Balancing Environmental Protection and Turf Performance

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Welcome. Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

A & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, INC.

DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS

Mir M. Seyedbagheri, Ph.D. Professor/Soil Agronomist 1

Reading and Analyzing your Fertilizer Bag. Dr. Cari Peters Vice President

Peters General Purpose fertilizer. Peters Peat-Lite Special complete

MEASURE AND MANAGE. Soiless Mixes, Testing and Nutrition Guidelines

Chinese Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate testing. Dick Camp Kronos Micronutrients

Nitrogen. Cotton Fertility. Glen Harris University of Georgia (Tifton) Sulfur. Phosphorous

HUMIC SOLUTIONS THE NEXT GENERATION OF SOIL HEALTH DISPERSIBLE SOLUBLE SPREADABLE BLENDABLE

Advanced ph management

UNDERSTANDING MICRONUTRIENT FERTILIZATION IN ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer, Daniel B Marcum and Steve B. Orloff 1 ABSTRACT

3.0 Supplying Nutrients to Crops

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Micronutrient Deficiencies in Blueberries and Their Correction

Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

HOW HUMIC ACIDS IMPROVE

Cranberry Nutrition: An A Z Guide. Joan R. Davenport Soil Scientist Washington State University

AGNES KTS (0-0-25)+SO3 42% Liquid T.C. Ministry of Agriculture License No.: 588 / Registration No.: 14627

Trends in Micro-Nutrient Soil Test Levels in Saskatchewan Pat Flaten, PAg 1, Brandon Green, PAg 2, Paul Routledge, PAg 3

Humizone. Rich Nutrients to Soil. SINOTECH (BEIJING) DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.

SOLUFEED WATER SOLUBLE FERTILISERS

1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2

Pr gyp -TURF. a soil and turf fertility product. S E E S. f u.

6/28/2016. Visual diagnosis of nutrient deficiencies in plants Botany 453/553: Summer Nutrient deficiencies are not easy to diagnose

PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Annual Weed Control in Young Blueberry Fields (Final Report Research).

2009 Elba Muck Soil Nutrient Survey Results Summary, Part III: Calcium, Magnesium and Micronutrients

NUTRITIONAL DESCRIPTION OF PITAHAYA (DRAGON FRUIT) DRAGON FRUIT / PITAHAYA SEMINAR UC SOUTH COAST RESEARCH AND EXTENSION CENTER AUGUST 2015

Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

Trends in Soil Management for Turf. David C. Smith P.Ag DCS Agronomic Services

Greenhouse Horticulture

Specialists In Soil Fertility, Plant Nutrition and Irrigation Water Quality Management.

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops. Monica Ozores-Hampton University of Florida/IFAS/SWFREC Spring 2013

UPTAKE OF MAJOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS BY GRASS BIOMASS AFTER AMELIORATION OF DEGRADED SOIL

Micronutrition On-Demand

FROM SOIL ELEMENTS TO FOOD NUTRIENTS: Joyce Kinabo Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University, Tanzania

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

Importance of Water Quality: ph, buffering, and effects on nutrient availability

RESPONSE OF TOMATO AND CORN PLANTS TO INCREASING Cd LEVELS IN NUTRIENT CULTURE

A Practical Approach Review of Humic and Fulvic acids.

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DIVISION OF MARKETING CHAPTER COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

FACTORS AFFECTING WATER QUALITY

INFLUENCE OF DAIRY MANURE APPLICATIONS ON CORN NUTRIENT UPTAKE

Miletin d.o.o., Crepaja. Flora Bečej - MK Group, Bečej. Uljarice Bačka, Ruma. Blago 4 - Treatment of sugar beet

Nutrient Management in Ornamental Production

FERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.

Characterization of Nutrient Disorders of Gerbera Hybrid Festival Light Eye Pink

EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION. <S) mt. a*: C 05 D 9/02

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Nutrition in Container Crops. Dr. James Altland

Nut Crop Nutrition Understanding the Principles to Optimize the Practices.

PLANT NUTRITION. Marasperse AG The Lignosulfonate-Based Complexing Agent for Foliar Micronutrients

INTRODUCTION TO VISCOFOL. Revolutionary high viscosity foliar feeds

Controlled Release Fertilizers Evaluations B & 12 Month Products

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DIVISION OF MARKETING CHAPTER COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Received: 4 th April-2014 Revised: 24 th May-2014 Accepted: 26 th May-2014 Research article

What is NUTRIO? Product Line for Biologically Active Products. Biologically Derived Products. Microbial Inoculants

RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO FERTILIZERS

Preventing, diagnosing and understanding nutrient deficiencies in plants

Transcription:

Title: Leonardite: A mined source of humic acid Authors and affiliations: Erick D. Smith 1,3 and James L. Jacobs 2 1 Department of Horticulture, The University of Georgia, 2360 Rainwater Rd, Tifton, GA 31793 2 Pierce County Extension, The University of Georgia Extension, 711 Hendry St, Blackshear, GA 31516 3 To whom reprint request should be addressed. E-mail address: ericks@uga.edu Subject Category: Blueberry Culture Abstract: Many blueberry growers in South Georgia have expressed interest about using humate as a soil amendment and its effect on fruit production. Presently, pine bark is used to amend soils to increase organic matter and lower ph. Pine bark, generally, is applied at a rate of 100 cubic yards per acre, with a cost from $800.00 to $1,200.00/A. To alleviate establishment costs, some growers incorporate Leonardite and/or its extracts, humic and fulvic acids, to increase organic matter. To extract humic and fulvic acid, the Leonardite is processed in a strongly basic aqueous solution, e.g. KOH. To precipitate the humic acid, the solution is adjusted to ph 1 with a mineral acid, e.g. H 2 SO 4. Three Leonardite products, two humic acids and one unextracted Leonardite, were analyzed for nutrient content. Calcium levels were 5000 ppm in both extracted samples and 2070 ppm in the unextracted Leonardite. Potassium levels were 977 and 800 ppm in the extracted samples and 125 ppm in the unextracted Leonardite, suggesting humic acid reacted with KOH. Research on Leonardite products and the effect on blueberry production are limited. 1

Rates of humate in ornamental horticulture suggest using 3% 12% v/v% in potting media. This equates to 30 120 t for equivalent additions on a per acre basis. At these rates, the application of calcium will be 124 1200 lb/a. Establishing blueberry at levels of 900 lb/a calcium is not recommended. The analysis of these Leonardite products is insightful as soil nutritional amendments to blueberry. Index words: Leonardite, humic acid, plant nutrients Introduction: Organic matter, as pine bark, in blueberry production is essential for lowering ph, increasing cation exchange capacity (CEC), and improving water retention. Generally, southeastern U.S. blueberry production depends on amendments of up to 20t/A of pine bark to successfully grow southern highbush (V. corymbosum interspecific hybrids) (Williamson et al 2006). At $40 60 a ton, the per acre price is $800 $1200 (Fonsah et al., 2013). Recently, blueberry growers in Georgia began amending their soils with humic acid and humate products derived from Leonardite to improve CEC and water retention. However, product labels are generally only expressing the concentration as % humic acid and % inert compounds. For humic acid extraction from Leonardite, the material is processed with a strong industrial caustic [e.g. NaOH, KOH, Ca (OH) 2 ] so that humic acid is taken into solution and a strong mineral acid (e.g. HCl or H 2 SO 4 ) to precipitate humic acid (Aitken et al., 1964). Considering the salt formation from the acid/base reaction and blueberry sensitivity to salt and calcium, a study to identify the mineral inputs from humic acid extracted form Leonardite was conducted. This study evaluates two commercially available products (Anderson s Humic DG and Helena s Humate) and an unprocessed source of Leonardite (Alma Sunbelt Blueberries). Methods and Materials: 2

Three commercially available products were analyzed at the UGA soils lab: Anderson s Humic DG, Helena s Hydra-Hume DG, and an unprocessed Leonardite (Alma Sunbelt Blueberry). Samples were extracted by Mehlich I (0.05N HCl + 0.025N H 2 SO 4 ). The inductively coupled plasma (ICP) method was used to analyze mineral content according to UGA s soil lab methodology (http://aesl.ces.uga.edu/protected/methods/stl-soil.html). Results and Discussion: Regular additions of organic matter to the soil are a common agricultural practice that has been utilized for more than 10K yrs. However, the function and chemistry of organic matter has been the focus of much research since Liebig s discoveries that inorganic compounds are utilized by plants for fertility. General consensus associates humic acid with enhancing CEC through organic functional groups such as phenolics, carboxylic acid, phthalate and nitrogen bearing groups (e.g. indole) (Aitken et al., 1964; Ricca et al., 1993; Ricca et al., 2000). Leonardite, a low grade coal, is mined to extract humic acid, which in turn is processed to be used as a soil amendment to be utilized for heavy metal remediation and to increase soil CEC (Soler-Rovira et al., 2010; Pertuit, et al, 2001). In this study, identifying the elemental nature of the products shows that Ca is 0.5% and 0.2% of processed and unprocessed Leonardite, respectively. At recommended rates of 40 400 lb/a, Ca additions would be 0.2 2lbs/A. Further, the K values of processed Leonardite are 977 800 ppm whereas the unprocessed material is 125 ppm (Table 1) suggesting KOH was used as the caustic extractant. In three studies, humic acid from Leonardite was analyzed to determine effect on growth: tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. Mill. Mountain Pride ) (Pertuit, et al, 2001), zinnia (Zinnia elegans Jacq. Small World Pink ) (Dudley et al., 2004), and turnip (Brassica rapa L. Purple Top White Globe ) (Duval et al., 1998). Tomato and zinnia where potted studies (sand or 1 sand - 1 peat) 3

where response was noted at 1/64% and 3.125% humic acid additions; this equates to 15.6 t/a and 31 t/a, respectively. Further, turnip grown in fine sandy loam soil in the field elicited no response to treatments of up to 400 lb/a. In each study, authors warned that Leonardite sources are variable, suggesting consumer awareness. If a grower were to apply humic products at the suggested rate for response, there is a 4-10 lb/t addition of Ca from unprocessed to processed Leonardite. Blueberry soil analysis recommendation (UGA Soils Lab) suggests not planting in soils greater than 900 lb/a Ca. Further, research of humic products and blueberry is limited and needs to be more thoroughly explored. Conclusion The relationship between blueberry and Leonardite products is not well defined. It is well established that blueberry growth is enhanced with organic matter amendments to the soil, especially pine bark (Williamson et al., 2006). However, humic products add non-organic, potentially undesirable, elements from the parent material and processing. In addition, studies reveal that rates greater than what is suggested on the label are needed to elicit a response. Considering levels of Ca in both the processed and unprocessed material, caution is advised in the use of Leonardite without thorough knowledge of the minerals being applied. References Aitken, J.B., Acock, B. and Senn, T.L. 1964. The characteristics and effects of humic acids derived from Leonardite. South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 1015 pp1-28 Dudley, J.B., Pertuit Jr. A. J., and Toler J.E. 2004. Leonardite influences zinnia and marigold growth. HortSci. 39(2):251-255 Duval, J.R., Dainello F.J., V.A. Haby V.A., and Earhart D.R. 1998. Evaluating Leonardite as a 4

crop growth enhancer for turnip and mustard greens. HortTech, 8(4): 564-567 Fonsah, E.G., Massonnat J., Wiggins L., Krewer G., Stanaland D., and Smith J.E., 2013. Southern Highbush Blueberry Marketing and Economics. Bulletin 1413, The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. Pertuit, A.J., J.B Dudley, and J.E. Toler. 2001. Leonardite and fertilizer levels influence tomato seedling growth. HortSci. 36(5):913-915 Ricca, G., Federico, L., Asrori, C. and Gallo, R. 1993. Structural investigations of humic from leonardite by spectroscopic methods and thermal analysis. Geoderma, 57: 263-274 Ricca, G., Severini, F., Di Silvestro, G., Yuan, C.M. and Adani, F. 2000. Derivatization and structural studies by spectroscopic methods of humic acids from Leonardite. Geoderma 98:115-125 Soler-Rovira, P., Madejón, E., Madejón, P. and Plaza, C. 2010. In situ remediation of metalcontaminated soils with orgainic amendments: Role of humic acids in copper bioavailability. Chemosphere 79:844-849 Williamson J., Krewer G., Palis G., and Mainland C.M., 2006, Blueberry soil management, nutrition and irrigation pp 60-74. In: Childers, N.F. and P.M. Lyrene (eds) Blueberries for growers, gardeners promoters. Dr. Norman F. Childers Horticultural Publications, Gainesville, FL 5

Table 1. ICP analysis of Leonardite unprocessed (Alma Sunbelt Blueberry) and commercially processed Leonardite Anderson s Humic DG and Helena s Humate. All elements are reported as parts per million (ppm) as well as ph. Leonardite/Humic Acid ICP Analysis Source ppm P K Ca Mg Mn Fe Al Cu Na Ni Zn Mo ph Anderson 117.5 977 4999.5 671 207 432.5 0.25 261 1.7 0.5 0.45 105 4.2 Helena 99 800 4999.5 481.5 131.5 205.5 0.25 279 0.95 0.35 0.3 114 4.1 Sunbelt 32 125 2070 2041 103 262.5 0.15 306.5 1.5 0.45 0.35 55.5 4.1 6