Poor & Hyper responders: what is the best approach?

Similar documents
Individualized treatment based on ovarian reserve markers

STIMULATION AND OVULATION TRIGGERING

Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE

Treatment of Poor Responders

Raoul Orvieto. The Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel. Declared no potential conflict of interest

Dr. Ernesto Bosch Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad Valencia, Spain. Declared no potential conflict of interest

Advanced age, poor responders and the role of LH supplementation. C. Alviggi University Federico II, Naples, Italy

Personalizing ovarian stimulation for IVF

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)

Luteal phase rescue after GnRHa triggering Progesterone and Estradiol

A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF

The old IVF patient: An evidence based approach. Stratis Kolibianakis MD MSc PhD

Is it the seed or the soil? Arthur Leader, MD, FRCSC

LUTEAL PHASE SUPPORT. Doç. Dr. Nafiye Yılmaz. Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi

Minimising IVF related mortality and morbidity. Scott Nelson Muirhead Professor in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Infertility Clinical Guideline

The emergence of Personalized Medicine protocols for IVF.

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

Principles of Ovarian Stimulation

Thrombosis during assisted reproduction. Scott Nelson Muirhead Chair in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Milder is better? Advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization

% Oocyte Donation Pregnancyes (days 3)

MODULE 1: OVULATION INDUCTION IN NORMAL RESPONDERS, POOR RESPONDERS, AND HYPERRESPONDERS

How to make the best use of the natural cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer?

Influence ovarian stimulation on oocyte and embryo quality. Prof.Dr. Bart CJM Fauser

LOW RESPONDERS. Poor Ovarian Response, Por

COMPARING AMH, AFC AND FSH FOR PREDICTING HIGH OVARIAN RESPONSE IN WOMEN UNDERGOING ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL

lbt lab tests t Conrolled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Dr Soheila Ansaripour

Number of oocytes and live births in IVF

A Tale of Three Hormones: hcg, Progesterone and AMH

Agonist versus antagonist in ICSI cycles: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis Badrawi A, Zaki S, Al-Inany H, Ramzy A M, Hussein M

IVF (,, ) : (HP-hMG) - (IVF- ET) : GnRH, HP-hMG (HP-hMG )57, (rfsh )140, (Gn)

NGUYEN QUOC ANH. M.D., M.Sc. Tu Du Hospital Vietnam

IVF Protocols: Hyper & Hypo-Responders, Implantation

Individualized Controlled Ovarian Stimulation: Biomarker-Guided Treatment Personalization

Biomarkers for Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome in Fertility Patients. Scott Nelson Muirhead Chair in Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Modified natural cycles: the Italian experience

Scientific Highlights: First world conference on luteinizing hormone in ART: Landing in Asia Pacific

Intérêt de l hcg et induction de l ovulation. Christophe Blockeel, MD, PhD Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels, Belgium

Optimizing the Management of the Poor Responder. Kaylen Silverberg, M.D. Texas Fertility Center Austin, Texas

L2. Optimising IVF outcomes through increased number of oocytes... 03

Minimal monitoring / Minimal stimulation as a means of increasing access to ART in developing countries

Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Scienze Riproduttive ed Odontostomatologiche. Tecniche di sincronizzazione ovocitaria. La sincronizzazione follicolare

CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION AND OOCYTE RETRIEVAL : CLINICAL INPUTS. DR Priyanka Sinha MD OB-GYN MUMBAI, INDIA


What is the POSEIDON concept?

Do aromatase inhibitors have a place in IVF?

Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Obs. & Gyn. First Indian to receive FIGO s Distinguished Merit Award for Services towards women s health.

Progesterone and clinical outcomes

A multi-centre, multinational, cross-sectional, incident case control study on Factors associated with the development of

Natural Cycle & Mild stimulation IVF/ICSI in women with Poor Ovarian Response (POR)

2013 Sep.; 24(3):

How to make the best use of the natural cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer?

Manish Banker. Declared receipt of grants; member of a company advisory board, board of director or similar group

(BMI)=18.0~24.9 kg/m 2 ;

L6: DuoStim: the alternative of oocytes/embryos accumulation programs Carlo Alviggi

Sample size a Main finding b Main limitations

R-Recent Advance in Patient Friendly Protocol

A survey on luteal phase support:

L8: Which POSEIDON groups may benefit of LH supplementation? C. Alviggi (Italy)

Are all-freeze cycles & frozen-thawed embryo transfers improving IVF outcomes?

2017 United HealthCare Services, Inc.

1 (gonadotropin, Gn) -,, : - (IVF-ET); (COH); ; : R711.6 : A : X(2014)

AOGS COMMENTARY SHAHAR KOL 1, ROY HOMBURG 2,3, BIRGIT ALSBJERG 4 & PETER HUMAIDAN 5. Abstract

IVF AND PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY (PGT-A) WHAT THE COMMUNITY PHYSICIAN NEEDS TO KNOW

Prognosticating ovarian reserve by the new ovarian response prediction index

AMH CUT-OFF VALUES FOR PREDICTING OVARIAN RESPONSE IN IVF. Nguyễn Xuân Hợi, MD, PhD Hoàng Văn Hùng MsC, MD

Does PCOS Compromise the oocyte and embryo quality or the endometrium?

Clinical Study Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve

In Vitro Fertilization in Clomiphene-Resistant Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Does triggering ovulation by 5000 IU of uhcg affect ICSI outcome? *

Ivf day 6 estradiol level

Oocyte Freezing and Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation:

Dr. Madhuri Patil. M.D., DGO, FCPS, DFP, FICOG. (Mum) Dr. Patil s Fertility & Endoscopy Clinic Bangalore

1. Introduction. Correspondence should be addressed to Krzysztof Lukaszuk;

Infertility in Women over 35. Alison Jacoby, MD Dept. of Ob/Gyn UCSF

Dr Guy Gudex. Director Repromed. 17:00-17:30 Recent Advances in Fertility Management

Disclosure. Robert Fischer Fertility Centre Hamburg Hamburg, Germany. Declared no potential conflict of interest.

Preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: guidance for the clinician

RBMOnline - Vol 15 No Reproductive BioMedicine Online; on web 25 September 2007

The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine Founded on Science, Dedicated to Life

(Predictive. value) Soheila Ansaripour Fellowship of infertility Ai Avicena Research In

A rationale for timing of luteal support post GnRH agonist trigger. Address: IVF Unit, Elisha Hospital, 12 Yair Katz Street, Haifa, Israel,

Summary

FSH pharmacogenetics

Središnja medicinska knjižnica

Endocrinological insights into different in vitro fertilization treatment aspects

Original Article. Downloaded from

Article Minimal ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: a large-scale retrospective study

(POR) (Gn) POR 3 2 : ( 40 ) ; IVF, 3 ; [ (AFC)<5~7 (AMH)<0.5~1.1 μg/l] GnRHa GnRHa GnRHA,, (GH) (A) (OC) : (POR); (COH); - (IVF-ET);

HCG mode of action versus GnRHa action for triggering of final oocyte maturation

Factors influencing serum progesterone level on triggering day in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles

Vanessa N. Weitzman, M.D., Lawrence Engmann, M.D., Andrea DiLuigi, M.D., Donald Maier, M.D., John Nulsen, M.D., and Claudio Benadiva, M.D.

Modified natural cycle IVF and mild IVF: a 10 year Swedish experience

Clinical Study Clinical Effects of a Natural Extract of Urinary Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin in Normogonadotropic Infertile Patients

Lutheal phase stimulation and fertility and first outcomes.

Universal Embryo Cryopreservation: Frozen versus Fresh Transfer. Zaher Merhi, M.D.

A new approach to IVF? Soft or mild IVF. Soft or mild IVF

Transcription:

Poor & Hyper responders: what is the best approach? A. La Marca ObGyn Dept University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Italy Center for Reproductive Medicine University Hospital of Modena Italy

Criteria used to define POR in medical literature <3-5 developed follicles <3-5 retrieved oocytes Peak E2 Day 3 FSH Inhibin B AMH >40 years Daily or total Gonadotrophin dose Days of stimulation Previous cycle cancellation....

Proposed criteria of POR (2 out of 3) 1. Previous cycle with less than 4 retrieved oocytes following maximal gonadotropin stimulation 2. Age > 40, or any other (genetic or acquired) risk factor for reduced ovarian reserve 3. Abnormal ovarian reserve tests Two previous cycles with < 4 oocytes are sufficient to define POR Any other criteria in the absence of ovarian stimulation define the expected poor response POR i. Two <4 oocytes-cycles ii. One <4 oocytes-cycle + age >40 iii. One <4 oocytes-cycle + abnormal marker ov reserve iv. age >40 and/abnormal markers (Expected POR) Age ESHRE consensus 2011 Abnormal ORT

Treatment strategies for poor responders High FSH dose Alternative GnRH aagonist protocol GnRH antagonist LH supplementation Adjunctive treatments (DHEA, estradiol priming)

Gonadotrophin dose for poor responders o Worldwide survey on gonadotrophin dose for poor responders (IVF Worldwide.com 2010) 150-225 IU/ day, 11.4% > 600 IU/ day, 0.3% 450-600 IU/ day, 23.7% 300-375 IU/ day, 36.7% 375-450 IU/day, 27.9% 196 centers from 45 countries involving 124,000 IVF cycles

No benefits from 450 IU (vs 300) in women with previous response N= 73 patients with previous poor response 450 IU vs 300 IU with mini dose flare-up GnRH agonist regimen High dose: similar pregnancy rates significantly high FSH consuption Cedrin-Durnerin Fertil Steril, 2000 300 450

F&S 2010 Prospective study N= 119 patients AFC < 12 Microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol

Low number of antral follicles will result in a low number of oocytes, even with high FSH dose N= 52 patients (AFC<5) 150 IU rfsh vs 300 IU rfsh No effect of high dose strategy Same number oocytes Same rate of cancellation Same rate of poor response Same rate of ongoing pregnancy Klinkert et al, Hum Reprod 2006 150 IU daily 300 IU daily

Treatment strategies for poor responders High FSH dose Alternative GnRH aagonist protocol GnRH antagonist LH supplementation Adjunctive treatments (DHEA, estradiol priming)

The GnRH analogue in poor responders o Worldwide survey on poor responders (IVF Worldwide.com 2010) 196 centers from 45 countries involving 124,000 IVF cycles

The PRINT trial: how to suppress pituitary in poor responders 111 patient with previous POR to 300 IU FSH Mean age > 36 Mena FSH > 10 IU/L Mean AFC < 7 Primary outcome: no. oocytes + 450 IU FSH OPR Sunkara et al F&S 2014 8.1% 8.1 % 16.2%

If the agonist long protocol offers no benefits compared to an antagonist protocol in poor responders, treatment with antagonists should be considered for poor responders as this would mean a shorter duration of treatment and a lower dose of medication.

Treatment strategies for poor responders High FSH dose Alternative GnRH aagonist protocol GnRH antagonist LH supplementation Adjunctive treatments (DHEA, estradiol priming)

Poor response was the leading indication for the 2:1 FSH/LH clinical use German multicentric study 2220 cycles Buhler et al 2014

Meta-analysis of Rec LH improving oocyte yield 40 RCTs 6443 patients Poor responders treated with rlh produced a statistically significant increase of 0.75 oocytes/pt This difference is not seen in normal responders and all patients Lehert et al 2014

Meta-analysis better outcomes seen in poor responders Poor responders treated with rlh produced a statistically significant increase of 30% relative increase in Clinical PR This difference is not seen in normal responders and all Lehert et al 2014

Treatment strategies for poor responders High FSH dose Alternative GnRH aagonist protocol GnRH antagonist LH supplementation Adjunctive treatments (DHEA, estradiol priming)

Mostly case-series, retrospective or small prospective studies

22 articles Only 3 controlled studies included 200 IVF cycles investigated No difference in number of oocytes, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate

DHEA in PORs: a randomized controlled trial 32 women Age < 40 AFC < 5 DHEA 75 mg for 3 months 450 IU hmg for 2 days, then 300 IU Placebo Fixed GnRH antagonist Primary Outcome: changes in AFC Yeung et al. F&S 2014

DHEA in PORs: a randomized controlled trial OPR LBR 18.8% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% NS NS Yeung et al. F&S 2014

Poor responders - Conclusions -Predict, counsel and individualize - Overmaximal FSH stimulation is useless (300 IU is sufficient) - Long GnRH agonist and Antagonist suitable for pituitary suppression - The GnRH agonist «flare» protocol is the less effective scheme - reclh may increase the number of oocytes and the outcome of the cycle - DHEA is useless

Definition of hyper - response Broer et al., 2011

Implications for high response in IVF Live birth and oocyte yield Increased risk of cancellation or freeze all Increased risk of OHSS Reduced pregnancy rate at least in the fresh cycle N = 400 135 Implantation rate and oocyte yield Verberg et al., Hum Reprod Update 2009 Sunkara et al., Hum Reprod 2011

15..the magic number 256,381 IVF cycles using the 2008 2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology 15 oocytes Steward et al., F&S, 2014

AFC the high number of antral follicles at young age largely explains the high rate of hyperresponse Rate of hyper-response (>15 oocytes) (n=827) La Marca, Fertil Steril 2010 50 % 45 40 Hyper 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 <=30 31-32 33-34 35-36 37-38 39-40 41-42 43-44

Retrospective study 37 women with previous OHSS 130 normal responders association between the BMP allele and high response (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.3 5.7)

Activating mutations in the FSHR and OHSS have been reported in the last years Mutant FSH receptors displayed abnormally high sensitivity to HCG broaden the specificity of the FSHR so that it responds to another ligand, HCG. May such mutations lead to increased susceptibility to iatrogenic OHSS in patients undergoing ovulation induction?. Kaiser 2003

Women anticipated to be hyper responders: what is the best approach? - Submaximal ovarian stimulation - GnRH antagonist control

In normal responder women the lower the FSH dose, the lower the number of oocytes Sterrenburg et al., 2011

RCT N=124 Age: 23-41 Normal responders

Clomiphene + FSH is an option to submaximally stimulate ovary CC+FSH OHSS FSH OR 0.23 expected prevalence 3.5 % 0.5-2% High cycle cancellation rate (OR 1.83) Expected cancellation rate: 11% 17-31% Gibreel et al., 2012

GnRH antagonist control is the first choice in hyper responder patients 2014-1.61 oocytes Metanalysis by Pundir et al. RBMonline 2013 Cycle cancellation (RR 0.47) OHSS (RR 0.61) GnRH ant vs GnRHa Similar CPR (RR 1.01)

To trigger, or not to trigger High response although low FSH and GnRH antagonist control Cancellation Coasting GnRHa triggering

GnRHa Trigger avoids OHSS Humaiden et al. Hum Reprod Update 2011 not always.. 2014

Reduced LBR with GnRHa triggering Humaidan et al. 2011

GnRH-a + 1500IU di hcg hcg Patients, n 152 150 Oocytes, n 8,9±5,4 9,3±5 MII 85,2% 81,5% betahcg + per ET 48% 48% Early Abortion 21% 17% Ongoing PR 26% 33% DR 24% 31% OHSS, n 0 3 Humaidan, Fertil Steril 2010

Tailoring triggering, luteal support and embryo transfer in high responders High no. Follicles (>25) «Freeze all» and segmentation High response and GnRHa triggering Low No. Follicles (< 25) +hcg 1500 IU (OPUd) Fresh embryo transfer Humaidan et al., 2013 Alternative and still underinvestigated protocols -Dual triggering -ultra low hcg supplementation -Luteal rec LH supplementation

Hyper responders - Conclusions -Predict, counsel and individualize - Submaximal FSH stimulation is mandatory - The FSH dose should be tailored on the basis of ovarian reserve markers (the higher the ovarian reserve, the lower the dose) - GnRH antagonist control is the first choice - In the case of high response, GnRHa triggering greatly reduces OHSS rate