J Clin Oncol 23: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab (Bexxar ) Corixa Corporation; marketed by GlaxoSmithKline 1

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies 90 Y-ibritumomab

CLINICAL RESEARCH RESULTS FROM THE ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY AND THE SOCIETY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Targeted Radioimmunotherapy for Lymphoma

Digital Washington University School of Medicine. Russell Schilder Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center. Arturo Molina Biogen Idec

for Follicular Lymphoma

A Quality Initiative of the Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Iodine-131 Tositumomab in Lymphoma

Non Transplant-Related Treatment Options in Follicular Lymphoma

JULIE M. VOSE. 3. Identify future directions for radioimmunotherapy in cancer medicine.

Dosimetric Dose: 450 mg of TST infused over 70 minutes (inclusive of a 10-minute flush) immediately followed by 35

RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF NON- HODGKIN S LYMPHOMA

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology. Follicular Lymphoma

Bendamustine for relapsed follicular lymphoma refractory to rituximab

RADIOIMMUNOCONJUGATES

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Volume Reduction versus Radiation Dose for Tumors in Previously Untreated Lymphoma Patients Who Received Iodine-131 Tositumomab Therapy

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Update: New Treatment Modalities

Ibritumomab Tiuxetan in Lymphoma: A Clinical Practice Guideline

This tutorial gives an overview of Radioimmunotherapy in Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma. After completing this tutorial, attendees will be able to:

try George Sgouros, Ph.D. Russell H. Morgan Dept of Radiology & Radiological Science Baltimore MD

Jonathan W Friedberg, MD, MMSc

This was a multicenter study conducted at 11 sites in the United States and 11 sites in Europe.

Antibody-Based Immunotherapeutic Agents for Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) constitute a heterogeneous. Original Articles

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Lymphoid Malignancies. The Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Introduction CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS

Biogen Idec Oncology Pipeline. Greg Reyes, MD, PhD SVP, Oncology Research & Development

Keywords: CD20, follicular lymphoma, iodine I 131 tositumomab, monoclonal antibody, radioimmunotherapy, tositumomab

Mathias J Rummel, MD, PhD

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 8 November 2006

Update: Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Radioimmunotherapy of non-hodgkin lymphomas

Author Manuscript Faculty of Biology and Medicine Publication

Bexxar : novel radioimmunotherapy for the treatment of low-grade and transformed low-grade non-hodgkin s lymphoma

Idelalisib treatment is associated with improved cytopenias in patients with relapsed/refractory inhl and CLL

Managing patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Case

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Disclosures WOJCIECH JURCZAK

Treatment with anti-cd20 monoclonal antibodies is the

The chimeric anti-cd20 antibody rituximab is an integral component

Radioimmunotherapy for B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Is there a role of HDT ASCT as consolidation therapy for first relapse follicular lymphoma in the post Rituximab era? Yes

Managing Indolent Lymphomas in Relapse: Working Our Way Through a Plethora of Options

Model-based optimization of rituximab dosing regimen in follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin and non-hodgkin Lymphoma: How do they work? Where will we use them? Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic

How I approach newly diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma patients with advanced stage? Professeur Gilles SALLES

Rituxan Hycela. Rituxan Hycela (rituximab and hyaluronidase human) Description

Corporate Medical Policy

Tiuxetan ( 90 Y-IT) as a consolidation

Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 January 2010

GSK Clinical Study Register

NON HODGKINS LYMPHOMA: INDOLENT Updated June 2015 by Dr. Manna (PGY-5 Medical Oncology Resident, University of Calgary)

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

LYMPHOMA Joginder Singh, MD Medical Oncologist, Mercy Cancer Center

B Kahl 1, M Hamadani 2, P Caimi 3, E Reid 4, K Havenith 5, S He 6, JM Feingold 6, O O Connor 7

Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody as a New Treatment Modality for B-Cell Lymphoma

Advances in the management of follicular lymphoma

Notification to Implement Issued by pcodr: December 14, 2012

Idelalisib in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Betalutin for the treatment of recurrent indolent NHL: new insights. Dr. Arne Kolstad 22 November 2017

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 July 2012

Radioimmunotherapy of Non. Hodgkin Lymphoma with

Background. Outcomes in refractory large B-cell lymphoma with traditional standard of care are extremely poor 1

The role of radiolabeled antibodies in the treatment of non-hodgkin s lymphoma: the coming of age of radioimmunotherapy

B-cell lymphoma vaccine (BiovaxID) for follicular non-hodgkin s lymphoma

BTK Inhibitors and BCL2 Antagonists

Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Indium-111 Zevalin Imaging

R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape

Rituximab in the Treatment of NHL:

Brad S Kahl, MD. Tracks 1-21

Addition of Rituximab to Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients with CLL: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

Chapter 5. M.J. Wondergem 1, J.M. Zijlstra 1, M. de Rooij 1, O.J. Visser 1, P.C. Huijgens 1, S. Zweegman 1

Oncologist. The. ASCO 2000: Critical Commentaries. Hematologic Malignancies: Selected Abstracts and Commentary MICHAEL L.

CLINICAL STUDY REPORT SYNOPSIS

ZEVALIN (ibritumomab tiuxetan) Information for Authorized Users and Administration Facilities

Gazyva (obinutuzumab)

THE USE OF IBRITUMOMAB AS CONSOLIDATION THERAPY AFTER REMISSION INDUCTION IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA

Pharmacyclics Reports Updated Clinical Results from its Phase IA Trial of its First in Human BTK- Inhibitor PCI-32765

Indolent Lymphomas. Dr. Melissa Toupin The Ottawa Hospital

Disclosures for Dr. Peter Borchmann 48 th ASH Annual meeting, Orlando, Florida

*Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

biij Radioimmunotherapy: a brief overview DCE Ng, MBBS, MRCP, FAMS Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal REVIEW ARTICLE

Unique Toxicities and Resistance Mechanisms Associated with Monoclonal Antibody Therapy

Radioimmunotherapy for B-cell lymphoma: Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I 131 tositumomab

SEQUENCING FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA

Improving the Efficacy of Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Transplantation for Lymphoma using Radioimmunotherapy

CLL: disease specific biology and current treatment. Dr. Nathalie Johnson

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

Prognostic Impact of Hyperglycemia in Patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Cervix Receiving Definite Radiotherapy

Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition: Bendamustine with rituximab for relapsed indolent non-hodgkin s lymphoma (all ages)

New Targets and Treatments for Follicular Lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Transcription:

VOLUME 23 NUMBER 4 FEBRUARY 1 2005 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY O R I G I N A L R E P O R T Efficacy and Safety of Tositumomab and Iodine-131 Tositumomab (Bexxar) in B-Cell Lymphoma, Progressive After Rituximab Sandra J. Horning, Anas Younes, Vinay Jain, Stewart Kroll, Jennifer Lucas, Donald Podoloff, and Michael Goris From Stanford University, Stanford, CA; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corixa Corp, South San Francisco, CA. Submitted July 9, 2004; accepted October 20, 2004. Supported by a grant from Corixa Corporation, South San Francisco, CA. Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, San Francisco, CA, December 5-8, 2000. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article. Address reprint requests to Sandra J. Horning, MD, Stanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr, Suite CC-2338, Stanford, CA 94305-5821; e-mail: sandra.horning@stanford.edu. 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 0732-183X/05/2304-712/$20.00 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.040 A B S T R A C T Purpose To determine overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) rates, response duration, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival and safety with the tositumomab and iodine-131 tositumomab ( 131 I tositumomab) therapeutic regimen in patients with indolent, follicular large-cell, or transformed B-cell lymphoma, progressive after rituximab. Patients and Methods From July 1998 to November 1999, 40 patients (24 rituximab nonresponders: 11 with response 6 months, and five with response 6 months) received a therapeutic dose (0.65 to 0.75 Gy per platelet count) of 131 I tositumomab based on total-body dosimetry in this prospective phase II study. The median number of prior treatments was four; 59% of patients were chemotherapy-resistant. Results Confirmed OR (65%) and CR (38%) rates were not significantly associated with prior rituximab response. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the median PFS was 10.4 months, 24.5 months for responders, and not reached for CR patients. Among follicular grade 1 or 2 patients with tumors 7cm(n 21), the OR and CR rates were 86% and 57%. Estimated 3-year PFS in this subgroup was 48%, compared with 11% for all others (P.002). Transient grade 3 to 4 marrow toxicity was seen in 50% of patients. Two patients, one of whom received two subsequent chemotherapy regimens, developed secondary myelodysplasia. Conclusion 131 I tositumomab is effective in CD20-positive lymphoma progressive after rituximab, with a 65% OR rate and median PFS of 24.5 months for responders. Patients with follicular grade 1 or 2 histology and tumors 7 cm achieved very high OR and CR rates, with 48% PFS at 3 years. J Clin Oncol 23:712-719. 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION Indolent lymphomas are characterized by advanced disease, initial response to chemotherapy, and relatively long survival. However, a pattern of multiple relapses ensues in the majority of patients throughout their disease course, during which time these lymphomas become more resistant to treatment and prone to transformation to an aggressive subtype. 1,2 Monoclonal antibodies reactive with lymphoid-associated antigens are attractive as less toxic but potentially effective agents. The CD20 antigen is an ideal target due to expression on more than 90% of B-cell non- Hodgkin s lymphomas 3,4 ; lack of shedding into the circulation or internalization after antibody binding 3,5 ; and lack of expression on early B-cell progenitors or plasma cells. Rituximab is a chimeric immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 kappa anti-cd20 antibody that 712

131 I Tositumomab After Rituximab Failure mediates complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibodydependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro, 6 with some evidence of a direct antiproliferative effect and induction of apoptosis in CD20-positive cell lines. 7 A fundamental role for complement was suggested in nonimmunodeficient mice, 8 whereas Fc receptor dependent mechanisms were found to contribute substantially to the action of rituximab in another murine system. 9 In the pivotal trial in relapsed or refractory low-grade B-cell lymphoma, an overall response (OR) rate of 50% was observed. 10 However, because half of the patients did not respond in the pivotal trial and the overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, additional treatments are required after rituximab. Tositumomab is an IgG2a murine anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody. 3 In vitro, the binding of tositumomab to CD20-positive cells invoked antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, 11 complement-dependent cytotoxicity, 12 and apoptosis. 13 Conjugation of tositumomab to a radionuclide such as iodine 131 ( 131 I) affords irradiation of lymphoma cells, both by direct cellular binding and through a crossfire effect to neighboring lymphoma cells within the pathlength of the radionuclide. The dosing methodology and maximum tolerated total-body dose (TBD) of 0.75 Gy were established in a phase I/II study of tositumomab and 131 I tositumomab (Bexxar; Corixa Corp, South San Francisco, CA, and GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA). 15 Despite extensive prior treatment, an OR rate of 83% was reported in this study population. Infusional side effects were minimal, and hematologic toxicity with nadirs at 6 to 10 weeks, followed by recovery, was observed. 14-16 The safety and efficacy of 131 I tositumomab, as well as the reproducibility of the dosimetry method for calculation of a patient-specific prescribed TBD of 0.75 Gy, were confirmed in a phase II multicenter study of 47 patients in which OR and complete response (CR) rates of 57% and 32% were reported. 17 In the pivotal trial of 131 I tositumomab, conducted in 60 lowgrade and transformed lymphoma patients who had received two or more prior regimens and failed to respond to or progressed within 6 months of last chemotherapy, the OR was 65% a significantly greater response rate and with longer duration than last chemotherapy. 18 The most common adverse event was transient marrow suppression similar to that observed in the earlier trials. Based on these encouraging outcomes and the increased use of rituximab in indolent lymphoma, we sought to establish the safety and efficacy of 131 I tositumomab in patients who progressed after rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Study Design and Eligibility This prospective, phase II study evaluated 131 I tositumomab in patients with indolent, follicular large-cell, or transformed B-cell lymphoma who had progressive disease after rituximab. The objectives were to determine the OR and CR rate, duration of response, PFS, survival, and safety profile. Efficacy end points were assessed by investigators and were subsequently reviewed by the Masked Independent Randomized Radiology and Oncology Review (MIRROR) panel. The study population included patients 18 years and older with CD20-positive follicular small cleaved or mixed (indolent, grade 1 or 2), de novo follicular large-cell (grade 3), or transformed (from low to intermediate-/high-grade according to the International Working Formulation classification) lymphoma. 19 Patients had progressed after at least one course of standard rituximab, defined as failure to achieve a partial response (PR) or CR or disease progression after response. Patients had bidimensionally measurable disease with at least one lesion measuring 2 2 cm. Bone marrow biopsy had to demonstrate 0% to 25% lymphoma infiltration. Other eligibility criteria included Karnofsky performance status 60%, anticipated survival 3 months, baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 1,500 cells/ mm 3 and platelet count 100,000/mm 3, and adequate renal and hepatic function. In addition, no evidence of circulating human antimurine antibody (HAMA) at baseline and within 48 hours before the therapeutic dose was allowed. Patients had to provide written informed consent according to each individual institutional review board. Treatment and Monitoring Tositumomab was produced by Lonza Biologics PLC (Slough, England)/CYTOGEN Corp (Princeton, NJ), and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG (Biberach, Germany). Radiolabeled 131 I tositumomab was manufactured in a central facility (MDS Nordion, Kanata, Canada) using the Iodogen method. 20 A dosimetric dose on day 0 was administered to calculate the day-7 to -14 therapeutic TBD of 0.75 Gy or attenuated to 0.65 Gy if the platelet count was less than 150,000/mm 3 as previously described. 21-23 The dose was adjusted to 137% lean body weight for obese patients. 18 To prevent thyroid uptake of 131 I, oral iodine was started 24 hours before the dosimetric dose and continued for 14 days after the therapeutic dose (potassium iodide four drops orally three times a day, or potassium iodide tablets 130 mg one tablet daily). Patients were examined at weeks 7, 13, and 25, with CBCs obtained weekly after week 3. After the therapeutic dose, computed tomography monitoring was done at weeks 7, 13, and 25 and, beginning at 1 year, every 6 months for up to 2 years, and then annually or until lymphoma progression or death. Thyroid function was assessed at weeks 25 and 36. A centralized assay for HAMA was performed at day 5 and at weeks 7, 13, and 25. After 1 year, chemistry and thyroid tests were checked every 6 months until disease progression, follow-up for 2 years, or death. After August 2001, HAMA evaluations were performed on all patients until 2 years, independent of disease status, and thyroidstimulating hormone (TSH) was to be assessed until death. Patients with progressive disease or followed up for 2 years entered long-term follow-up, where additional lymphoma therapy, thyroid function, and secondary malignancies were monitored annually. Assessment of Efficacy CR was defined as disappearance of all disease-related radiographic abnormalities, signs, and symptoms. A complete clinical response was defined as a CR, but allowed a stable residual radiographic abnormality 2 cm in diameter or 1 cm by physical examination. PR was defined as a 50% decrease in the sum of the www.jco.org 713

Horning et al products of the longest perpendicular diameters (SPPD) of measurable lesions and no new lesions. PD was defined as more than 25% in the SPPD of measurable lesions or the presence of new lesions. All responses were confirmed 4 weeks after initial response. Herein we report investigator responses but also discuss concordance with an independent, blinded review panel composed of two radiologists and two oncologists. Investigator assessments were used to supplement the durations for patients in continued response at their last independent assessment. Statistical Methods This study was designed to enroll 40 assessable patients. Analyses were performed with a data cutoff of May 2003. Duration of response and PFS were measured according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. PFS was measured from the dosimetric dose to the time of progression. Two-sided 95% CIs were calculated for response rates. All subgroup comparisons had two-sided test statistics. P values and CIs are presented without adjustment for multiple comparisons, outcomes, or looks. Exploratory univariate analyses comparing the OR and CR rates used the 2 test with Yate s correction for categories with two subgroups. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for PFS in exploratory univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Patient Characteristics Forty-three patients were enrolled, but three withdrew before receiving the dosimetric dose due to ineligibility (two patients) or decision to initiate other therapy (one patient). Characteristics of the 40 patients treated at the three institutions from July 1998 to November 1999 are detailed in Table 1. The median age was 57 years (range, 35 to 78 years). Histology determined at each institution was: follicular small cleaved (grade 1, n 12); follicular mixed (grade 2, n 14); and one each of small lymphocytic and marginal zone. Two patients had de novo follicular largecell (grade 3) lymphoma. Transformations were reported to the following: small cleaved with a diffuse pattern (n 2), mixed with a diffuse pattern (n 2), follicular large cell (n 1), diffuse large cell (n 3), and other (n 2). Bone marrow was involved in 30%. Adverse characteristics included elevated lactic dehydrogenase in 31% and high or high-intermediate International Prognostic Index score in 21%. Thirteen patients (32%) had tumor masses larger than 7 cm, with 50% 5 cm. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was four (range, one to 11), and the investigators considered 58% refractory to last chemotherapy. Twenty-four patients (60%) had no response to prior rituximab, 11 had a response duration less than 6 months, and five had a response duration 6 months. Treatment and Efficacy The median therapeutic dose of 131 I was 88.7 mci (range, 52.6 to 168.6); 80% received 0.75 Gy, and 20% received 0.65 Gy TBD. With a median follow-up from the dosimetric dose of 39 months, the confirmed OR rate was 65% (panel assessed 68%). A confirmed CR was documented in 38% (panel assessed 32%). There was 98% concordance between the panel and the investigator assessments of confirmed OR, and 85% concordance for confirmed CR (34 of 40 patients). The latter discordance consisted of four investigator CRs interpreted as partial by the panel, and two investigator PRs interpreted as complete by the panel. At the first (7-week) evaluation, the unconfirmed response rate was 66.7%, and the unconfirmed CR rate was 16.7%. The median time to CR was 13 weeks (range, 7 to 57 weeks). The median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 18.6) for all patients and 24.5 months for confirmed responders (95% CI, 16.8 to not reached [NR]; Fig 1). As illustrated in Figure 2, the PFS for 15 confirmed CR patients was NR with Table 1. Selected Characteristics in 40 Patients Patients Characteristic No. % Sex, male 27 68 Age 60 years 15 38 Histology Follicular, grade 1 12 30 Follicular, grade 2 14 35 Other indolent 2 5 De novo follicular, grade 3 2 5 Transformed 10 25 Disease bulk, cm 5 20 50 7 13 32 No response to last rituximab 24 60 Chemotherapy refractory 22 56 See text for description of transformed histologies. At least two prior therapies with no response, or a response with duration of response of 6 months on last chemotherapy. Fig 1. Progression-free survival for all patients (N 40) and confirmed responders (n 26). 714 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

131 I Tositumomab After Rituximab Failure with significantly longer PFS. In multivariate analysis, only follicular grade 1 or 2 histology was associated with significantly longer PFS. Most CR patients (80%) had both follicular grade 1 or 2 histology and tumor bulk 7 cm. As indicated in Table 3, 18 (86%) of 21 patients with these characteristics responded to 131 I tositumomab, and 12 (57%) of 21 had CRs. In contrast, patients with greater tumor bulk or other histologies (n 19) had a 42% OR rate (P.004) and a 16% CR rate (P.007). The median durations of response and CR were not reached in patients with both follicular grade 1 or 2 histology and tumor bulk 7 cm. PFS at 3 years was 48% in this group compared with 11% for all other patients (P.002; Fig 3). Fig 2. Progression-free survival for investigator-assessed complete responders (n 15) and panel-assessed complete responders (n 13). CRs, complete responses; MIRROR, Masked Independent Randomized Radiology and Oncology Review. an estimated 3-year PFS of 73%. To date, 12 patients continue in response (11 CR, one PR) from 3.0 to 4.6 years after therapy. Figure 2 also illustrates the PFS for 13 confirmed CR patients according to panel assessment. The investigator-assessed group included four patients scored as PR by the panel; three of these patients continue in remission with no further therapeutic intervention at 3.4, 3.7, and 4.0 years; and one progressed at 2.1 years. Table 2 indicates that prior response to rituximab did not significantly affect the confirmed OR rate, duration of response, or median PFS. No significant differences in confirmed CR rate or duration were observed. As demonstrated in Figure 2, patients who achieved CR after 131 I tositumomab enjoyed prolonged PFS despite multiple prior therapies. In univariate analyses, age 60 years, tumor bulk 7 cm, and follicular grade 1 or 2 histology were associated Fig 3. Progression-free survival for patients with follicular grade 1/2 non-hodgkin s lymphoma and tumor size 7cm(n 21) and patients with other histologies, or tumor size greater than 7 cm (n 19). Adverse Events Two patients required adjustments in tositumomab infusions. A minority (16%) of nonhematologic adverse events was grade 3 or 4; these included pneumonia (n 4), pain (n 2), and nausea (n 2). Twenty patients (50%) experienced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity, including ANC less than 1,000/mm 3 (n 17), platelets less than 50,000/mm 3 (n 10), and hemoglobin less than 8.0 g/dl (n 4). Seven patients developed grade 4 neutropenia, and four had grade 4 thrombocytopenia (including one patient with platelets 10,000/mm 3 ). Median nadirs were ANC 1,200/mm 3, platelets 85,000/mm 3, and hemoglobin 11.0 g/dl, with respective median times to nadir of 42, 34, and 42 days. Nine patients received hematologic supportive care, including erythropoietin (n 6), red cell transfusions (n 6), platelet transfusions (n 4), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (n 3). Twenty-two patients (55%) developed infections within 12 weeks of the therapeutic dose, of which 15 (68%) were grade 1 or grade 2 upper respiratory or viral infections. Serious infections were recorded in two patients with pneumonia. Among 31 assessable patients, three developed an elevation of TSH including one patient who initiated medication following 131 I tositumomab therapy, translating to a 3-year cumulative risk of 9.7%. Of the nine nonassessable patients, seven had abnormal thyroid function documented before treatment, and two were missing baseline TSH data but continued to have normal TSH after 4 years. Two patients (5%) developed HAMA 5 and 12 days after the dosimetric dose, and before the therapeutic dose. At week 7, both patients tested HAMA-negative, and no further time points were assessed. Two patients were diagnosed with myelodysplasia (MDS) with evolution to acute myelogenous leukemia 2.1 and 3.3 years after receiving 131 I tositumomab. The first patient was previously treated with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide and para-aortic and hemipelvic radiation therapy (RT). The second patient had received three chemotherapy regimens and RT before 131 I tositumomab www.jco.org 715

Horning et al Table 2. Efficacy of 131 I Tositumomab According to Prior Rituximab Response Response to Prior Rituximab Yes (n 16) No (n 24) Efficacy of 131 I Tositumomab No. % No. % P Confirmed response rate 11 69 15 62.946 Duration of response, months.973 Median 24.9 22.4 95% CI 7.2 to NR 10.6 to NR Confirmed CR rate 9 56 6 25.096 Duration of CR.071 Median NR NR 95% CI 15.4 to NR NR to NR Progression-free survival, months.842 Median 13.0 8.9 95% CI 3.3 to NR 5.3 to NR Abbreviations: 131 I, iodine-131; NR, not reached; CR, complete response. Yates-corrected 2 test for response rate; log-rank test for duration measures. therapy and two additional courses of chemotherapy after radioimmunotherapy. Two patients developed solid tumors after treatment: prostate cancer at 3.9 years and squamous cell skin cancer at 1.5 years. Overall Survival The estimated overall survival was 60% at 3 years (Fig 4). Sixteen (40%) of 40 patients were dead at the data cutoff time. Ten patients died from progressive disease, two from complications of subsequent transplantation, two from infectious complications of further lymphoma therapy, and one each from complications after gall bladder surgery and secondary leukemia. The median duration of survival from the dosimetric dose was not reached (95% CI, 24.8 months to NR). DISCUSSION These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of 131 I tositumomab therapy in patients with indolent and transformed B-cell lymphoma who developed progressive disease after rituximab. The majority (88%) would be considered rituximab-refractory based on failure to respond or sustain a response for 6 months. The efficacy of 131 I tositumomab might be attributable to the cytotoxic effects of tositumomab, irradiation, or both. The mechanisms by which lymphomas acquire or harbor endogenous resistance to single-agent rituximab are incompletely understood. Clinical samples from patients treated with rituximab have not confirmed preclinical data implicating inhibitors of complement as a resistance mechanism. 24,25 In two separate reports, polymorphisms in the Fc receptor associated with IgG1 antibodies correlated with the rate and duration of response to rituximab in follicular lymphoma. 26,27 Such polymorphisms are not clearly relevant for the murine antibody tositumomab. Although both antibodies target the CD20 epitope, distinct mechanisms of action were proposed based on observations in B-cell lines where F(ab )2 fragments of tositumomab but not rituximab resulted in apoptosis in the absence of crosslinking. 28 As a murine unconjugated antibody, tositumomab is less well equipped than rituximab to mediate cytotoxicity Table 3. Efficacy of 131 I Tositumomab According to Histology and Tumor Size Grade 1 or 2 and Tumor Size 7cm(n 21) All Others (n 19) Median 95% CI Median 95% CI P Confirmed OR rate, % 86 42.011 Duration of response NR 15.4 to NR 16.5 4.5 to NR.144 Confirmed CR rate 57 16.018 Duration of CR NR NR to NR NR 24.9 to NR.900 Progression-free survival 18.6 11.7 to NR 5.1 3.0 to 23.5.002 Abbreviations: OR, overall response; NR, nor reached; CR, complete response. Yates-corrected 2 test for response rate; log-rank test for duration measures. 716 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

131 I Tositumomab After Rituximab Failure Fig 4. Overall survival for all patients (N 40). Dotted lines indicate 95% CI. through host effector mechanisms, and this may explain the excellent tolerance for both dosimetric and therapeutic doses. In lymphoma xenograft models, complement depletion, elimination of NK cells, and binding to CD20 by tositumomab or F(ab )2 resulted in cytotoxicity, implying that non Fc dependent mechanisms were operative with tositumomab. 29 In these studies, much higher levels of apoptosis were seen with tositumomab compared with rituximab. The independent efficacy of unconjugated tositumomab in recurrent or refractory B-cell NHL was demonstrated to be 19% in a randomized trial in which two patients had CRs of long duration. 30 Although unconjugated tositumomab can contribute to tumor responses, results of a randomized trial indicate that the major efficacy is the consequence of low-dose-rate irradiation from 131 I tositumomab. 30 Similarly, in a randomized trial, significantly higher response rates were seen with the murine anti-cd20 parent antibody of rituximab (ibritumomab) conjugated with Yttrium-90 compared with rituximab in recurrent indolent and transformed lymphoma. 31 Indolent lymphomas are exquisitely sensitive to radiation as evidenced by prolonged remissions after external beam radiation for limited-stage disease, and high OR and CR rates with low-dose radiation in patients with recurrent indolent lymphoma. 32-35 In a preclinical model, the administration of radiation at a low dose rate (LDR) throughout a long period, simulating radioimmunotherapy, was associated with greater antitumor efficacy. 36 The radiobiology of LDR RT is incompletely understood, but lymphoma cells may be more susceptible to LDR-induced apoptosis. 37 The efficiency of DNA repair systems and the existence of soluble mediators may also be operative. We observed an OR rate of 65%, with a median duration of response of 24.5 months in patients with a median of four prior chemotherapy courses (more than half were considered chemotherapy refractory); such patients have few therapeutic options. The clinical benefit from 131 I tositumomab was remarkable for patients achieving CR in our study: 11 of 15 continue progression free between 3.0 and 4.6 years. The 73% PFS (95% CI, 54% to 100%) at 3 years in CR patients defines a highly durable and clinically important therapeutic result. The lack of ongoing progression or requirement for additional treatment for 3 years in three of four patients assessed by investigators as continuing in CR, in contrast to the independent panel assessment of progressive disease, likely reflects the true absence of active lymphoma in these patients and the perils of measuring very small changes in lymph nodes. Witzig et al reported the effects of Yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy in a group of primarily follicular grade 1 or 2 lymphoma patients with progressive disease after rituximab. 38 In this study, in which all patients had failed to respond to rituximab or relapsed within 6 months, the OR rate was 74%, and the CR rate was 15%. With a maximum follow-up of approximately 18 months, the median time to progression was 8.7 months for responders. In the current 131 I tositumomab study, all patients have been followed for 36 to 55 months, and the median PFS was 25.4 months. Although patients in both studies had received a median of four prior treatments, dissimilarities in other patient characteristics may have influenced response to the different radioimmunotherapy treatments. While it is expected that patients with nontransformed histology and tumors less than 7 cm in the current study had better outcomes, the high rate of CR (57%) and the duration of response (48% PFS estimated at 3 years) is remarkable in this multiply treated subset. The excellent long-term results from a pilot study in which 131 I tositumomab was administered as primary therapy for follicular lymphoma and the absence of late toxicity in that patient population are notable. 39,40 Together, these data suggest that 131 I tositumomab should not be reserved until late in a follicular lymphoma patient s disease course when histologic transformation, bulky disease and possible resistance to LDRinduced apoptosis are more likely. Rather, our results provide rationale for use of 131 I tositumomab earlier in the course of disease, and potentially following other treatment that lessens the tumor burden. The development of MDS/leukemia in two patients may be an unfortunate consequence of the cumulative effects of cytotoxic therapy for lymphoma, recognized complications of alkylating agents and total-body irradiation. 41 In an analysis of 995 patients treated with 131 I tositumomab, Bennett et al estimated the annualized incidence to be 1.1% per year. 42 To date, no MDS or leukemia has been seen after primary therapy with 131 I tositumomab alone or after CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone). 40,43 Although a relatively high rate of infection was reported in our study population, the www.jco.org 717

Horning et al majority were grade 1 or 2, of presumed viral etiology, and the incidence of serious infections (n 2; 5%) was consistent with the overall incidence of serious infection, 4.3%, in the 131 I tositumomab safety database. In conclusion, 131 I tositumomab is effective and well-tolerated therapy for patients with indolent and transformed B-cell lymphoma progressive after rituximab therapy. Patients with follicular grade 1 or 2 histology and tumors 7 cm had very high OR and CR rates, with a PFS of 48% at 3 years. Secondary MDS/leukemia resulting from the cumulative effects of all cytotoxic therapy was observed in two patients and remains a potential concern. Taken together, these data argue that 131 I tositumomab therapy should be considered early in the disease course of follicular lymphoma. Future efforts directed toward understanding the in vivo biology of LDR radiation and continued support for clinical trials that seek to determine the optimal timing and combination of therapeutics for B-cell lymphoma are indicated. Authors Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest The following authors or their immediate family members have indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. Employment: Stewart Kroll, Corixa Corp. Consultant/Advisory Role: Sandra J. Horning, GlaxoSmithKline; Donald Podoloff, Corixa Corp; Michael Goris, Corixa Corp. Stock Ownership: Stewart Kroll, Corixa Corp. Honoraria: Donald Podoloff, Corixa Corp. Research Funding: Sandra J. Horning, Corixa Corp; Anas Younes, Corixa Corp; Vinay Jain, Corixa Corp; Donald Podoloff, Corixa Corp. Expert Testimony: Sandra J. Horning, Corixa Corp. Other Remuneration: Vinay Jain, Corixa Corp, GlaxoSmithKline. For a detailed description of these categories, or for more information about ASCO s conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration form and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section of Information for Contributors found in the front of every issue. REFERENCES 1. Horning SJ: Natural history of and therapy for the indolent non-hodgkin s lymphomas. Semin Oncol 20:75-88, 1993 2. Johnson PW, Rohatiner AZ, Whelan JS, et al: Patterns of survival in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma: A 20-year study from a single center. J Clin Oncol 13:140-147, 1995 3. Stashenko P, Nadler LM, Hardy R, et al: Characterization of a human B lymphocytespecific antigen. J Immunol 125:1678-1685, 1980 4. Anderson KC, Bates MP, Slaughenhoupt BL, et al: Expression of human B cell-associated antigens on leukemias and lymphomas: A model of human B cell differentiation. Blood 63:1424-1433, 1984 5. Einfeld DA, Brown JP, Valentine MA, et al: Molecular cloning of the human B cell CD20 receptor predicts a hydrophobic protein with multiple transmembrane domains. Embo J 7:711-717, 1988 6. Reff ME, Carner K, Chambers KS, et al: Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood 83:435-445, 1994 7. Rose AL, Smith BE, Maloney DG: Glucocorticoids and rituximab in vitro: Synergistic direct antiproliferative and apoptotic effects. Blood 100:1765-1773, 2002 8. Di Gaetano N, Cittera E, Nota R, et al: Complement activation determines the therapeutic activity of rituximab in vivo. J Immunol 171:1581-1587, 2003 9. Clynes RA, Towers TL, Presta LG, et al: Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytoxicity against tumor targets. Nat Med 6:443-446, 2000 10. McLaughlin P, Grillo-López AJ, Link BK, et al: Rituximab chimeric anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: Half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol 16:2825-2833, 1998 11. Tedder TF, Forsgren A, Boyd AW, et al: Antibodies reactive with the B1 molecule inhibit cell cycle progression but not activation of human B lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 16:881-887, 1986 12. Nadler LM, Anderson KC, Bates MP, et al: Human B cell-associated antigens: Expression on normal and malignant B lymphocytes, in Bernard ABL, Dausset J, Milstein C (eds): Leukocyte Typing: Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens Detected by Monoclonal Antibodies. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 1984, pp 354-363 13. Shan D, Ledbetter JA, Press OW: Apoptosis of malignant human B cells by ligation of CD20 with monoclonal antibodies. Blood 91: 1644-1652, 1998 14. Kaminski MS, Zasadny KR, Francis IR, et al: Radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma with [131I]anti-B1 (anti-cd20) antibody. N Engl J Med 329:459-465, 1993 15. Kaminski MS, Zasadny KR, Francis IR, et al: Iodine-131-anti-B1 radioimmunotherapy for B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 14:1974-1981, 1996 16. Kaminski MS, Estes J, Zasadny KR, et al: Radioimmunotherapy with iodine (131)I tositumomab for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma: Updated results and long-term follow-up of the University of Michigan experience. Blood 96:1259-1266, 2000 17. Vose JM, Wahl RL, Saleh M, et al: Multicenter phase II study of iodine-131 tositumomab for chemotherapy-relapsed/refractory low-grade and transformed low-grade B-cell non-hodgkin s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 18:1316-1323, 2000 18. Kaminski MS, Zelenetz AD, Press OW, et al: Pivotal study of iodine I 131 tositumomab for chemotherapy-refractory low-grade or transformed low-grade B-cell non-hodgkin s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 19:3918-3928, 2001 19. National Cancer Institute sponsored study of classifications of non-hodgkin s lymphomas: Summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usage: The Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma Pathologic Classification Project. Cancer 49:2112-2135, 1982 20. Salacinski PR, McLean C, Sykes JE, et al: Iodination of proteins, glycoproteins, and peptides using a solid-phase oxidizing agent, 1,3,4,6- tetrachloro-3 alpha,6 alpha-diphenyl glycoluril (Iodogen). Anal Biochem 117:136-146, 1981 21. Kaminski MS, Fig LM, Zasadny KR, et al: Imaging, dosimetry, and radioimmunotherapy with iodine 131-labeled anti-cd37 antibody in B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 10:1696-1711, 1992 22. Wahl RL, Kroll S, Zasadny KR: Patientspecific whole-body dosimetry: Principles and a simplified method for clinical implementation. J Nucl Med 39:14S-20S, 1998 23. Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE: MIRD Primer for Absorbed Dose Calculations. Reston, VA, The Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc, 1988 24. Golay J, Zaffaroni L, Vaccari T, et al: Biologic response of B lymphoma cells to anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in vitro: CD55 and CD59 regulate complement-mediated cell lysis. Blood 95:3900-3908, 2000 25. Weng WK, Levy R: Expression of complement inhibitors CD46, CD55, and CD59 on tumor cells does not predict clinical outcome after rituximab treatment in follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 98:1352-1357, 2001 26. Cartron G, Dacheux L, Salles G, et al: Therapeutic activity of humanized anti-cd20 718 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

131 I Tositumomab After Rituximab Failure monoclonal antibody and polymorphism in IgG Fc receptor FcgammaRIIIa gene. Blood 99:754-758, 2002 27. Weng WK, Levy R: Two immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphisms independently predict response to rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3940-3947, 2003 28. Cardarelli PM, Quinn M, Buckman D, et al: Binding to CD20 by anti-b1 antibody or F(ab )(2) is sufficient for induction of apoptosis in B-cell lines. Cancer Immunol Immunother 51:15-24, 2002 29. Cragg MS, Glennie MJ: Antibody specificity controls in vivo effector mechanisms of anti- CD20 reagents. Blood 103:2738-2743, 2004 30. Davis TA, Kaminski MS, Leonard J, et al: Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing tositumomab and iodine-131 tositumomab with tositumomab alone in patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade or transformed low grade non-hodgkin s lymphoma. Proc Am Soc Hematol 102:405a, 2003 (abstr 1474) 31. Witzig TE, Gordon LI, Cabanillas F, et al: Randomized controlled trial of yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy versus rituximab immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-hodgkin s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 20:2453-2463, 2002 32. Mac Manus MP, Hoppe RT: Is radiotherapy curative for stage I and II low-grade follicular lymphoma? Results of a long-term follow-up study of patients treated at Stanford University. J Clin Oncol 14:1282-1290, 1996 33. Girinsky T, Guillot-Vals D, Koscielny S, et al: A high and sustained response rate in refractory or relapsing low-grade lymphoma masses after low-dose radiation: Analysis of predictive parameters of response to treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:148-155, 2001 34. Haas RL, Poortmans P, de Jong D, et al: High response rates and lasting remissions after low-dose involved field radiotherapy in indolent lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 21:2474-2480, 2003 35. Meerwaldt JH, Carde P, Burgers JM, et al: Low-dose total body irradiation versus combination chemotherapy for lymphomas with follicular growth pattern. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1167-1172, 1991 36. Knox SJ, Sutherland W, Goris ML: Correlation of tumor sensitivity to low-dose-rate irradiation with G2/M-phase block and other radiobiological parameters. Radiat Res 135:24-31, 1993 37. Armstrong JS, Hornung B, Lecane P, et al: Rotenone-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a human B lymphoma cell line PW. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289:973-978, 2001 38. Witzig TE, Flinn IW, Gordon LI, et al: Treatment with ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy in patients with rituximabrefractory follicular non-hodgkin s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 20:3262-3269, 2002 39. Kaminski MS, Zelenetz AD, Leonard J, et al: Bexxar radioimmunotherapy produces a substantial number of durable complete responses in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory low grade or transformed low grade non- Hodgkin s lymphoma. Proc Am Soc Hematol 100:357a, 2002 (abstr 1382) 40. Kaminski MS, Bennet J, Tuck M, et al: Lack of treatment-related MDS/AML in patients with follicular lymphoma after frontline therapy with tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:575, 2003 (abstr 2313) 41. Armitage JO, Carbone PP, Connors JM, et al: Treatment-related myelodysplasia and acute leukemia in non-hodgkin s lymphoma patients. J Clin Oncol 21:897-906, 2003 42. Bennett JM, Kaminski MS, Knox SJ, et al: Assessment of treatment-related myelodysplastic syndromes (tmds) and acute meyloid leukemia (taml) in patients with low-grade non-hodgkin s lymphoma treated with tositumomab and iodine- 131 tositumomab (the BEXXAR regimen). Proc Am Soc Hematol 102:30a, 2003 (abstr 91) 43. Press OW, Unger JM, Braziel RM, et al: A phase 2 trial of CHOP chemotherapy followed by tositumomab/iodine I 131 tositumomab for previously untreated follicular non-hodgkin lymphoma: Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S9911. Blood 102:1606-1612, 2003 www.jco.org 719