RESEARCH ARTICLE. Ufuk Berber 1 *, Ismail Yilmaz 1, Omer Yilmaz 2, Aptullah Haholu 1, Zafer Kucukodaci 1, Ferhat Ates 2, Dilaver Demirel 1.

Similar documents
Association between ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in a Chinese population

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

CYP1A2-163C/A (rs762551) polymorphism and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study

Lack of association between ERCC5 gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in a Chinese population

Association between the CYP1A1 polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Investigation of GSTP1 (Ile105Val) Gene Polymorphism in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients

Genetic variability of genes involved in DNA repair influence treatment outcome in osteosarcoma

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Xue-Yan Jiang 1, Fu-Hou Chang 1 *, Tu-Ya Bai 1, Xiao-Li Lv 1, Min-Jie Wang 1, Guang Wang 2. Abstract.

Investigation of the role of XRCC1 genetic polymorphisms in the development of gliomas in a Chinese population

Genetic polymorphisms and head and neck cancer risk (Review)

Significant Association of Ku80 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Bladder Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan

dna oestrogen GENOTYPE REPORT Patient Name: Date of Birth: Sample Number: Referring Practitioner: Date Reported:

Influence of ERCC2 gene polymorphisms on the treatment outcome of osteosarcoma

Investigating the role of polymorphisms in mir-146a, -149, and -196a2 in the development of gastric cancer

Correlations between the COMT gene rs4680 polymorphism and susceptibility to ovarian cancer

Lack of association between IL-6-174G>C polymorphism and lung cancer: a metaanalysis

Association of GSTTI and GSTM1 variants with acute myeloid leukemia risk

Investigation on ERCC5 genetic polymorphisms and the development of gastric cancer in a Chinese population

Investigation of ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms and response to chemotherapy and overall survival in osteosarcoma

optimal health for life genotype report Name: Date of Birth: Sample Number: Referring Practitioner: Date Reported:

CYP19 gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility to breast cancer in Xinjiang Uigur women

Effect of variation of ABCB1 and GSTP1 on osteosarcoma survival after chemotherapy

Association between rs G<C gene polymorphism and susceptibility to pancreatic cancer in a Chinese population

Predictive potential role of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in the prognosis of breast cancer

RESEARCH COMMUNICATION. Meta-analysis of the Association Between GSTM1 and GSTT1 Gene Polymorphisms and Cervical Cancer

Cytochrome P450 2E1 RsaI/PstI and DraI Polymorphisms Are Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in Mongolian and Han Population in Inner Mongolia

Association between ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

Association between the -77T>C polymorphism in the DNA repair gene XRCC1 and lung cancer risk

Estrogen Report GENOTYPE REPORT OPTIMAL HEALTH FOR LIFE. John Doe NAME DATE OF BIRTH 7/31/1999 REFFERRING PRACTITIONER. Dr. Exercise/Diet specialist

2. BALcanOSH MEDNARODNA KONFERENCA ZA REGIONALNO SODELOVANJE, BLED, SLOVENIJA

Predictive potential role of glutathione S-transferases polymorphisms in response to chemotherapy and breast cancer prognosis

Association between ERCC1 and XPF polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer

Association of CYP1B1 Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study in the Han Population in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, P. R.

Welcome. to your dna osetrogen report. Welcome to your dna oestrogen report

Glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphism and lung cancer in Indian population: a meta-analysis of case-control studies

Association between IL-17A and IL-17F gene polymorphisms and risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population

CYP1A1 Polymorphisms and Risk of Prostate Cancer A Meta-analysis

Polymorphisms of DNA repair-related genes with susceptibility and prognosis of prostate cancer

GSTM1 null polymorphism a possible key for oral carcinogenesis

mir-146a and mir-196a2 polymorphisms in ovarian cancer risk

Award Number: W81XWH TITLE: CYP1B1 Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Race-Related Prostate Cancer

Association of Genetic Polymorphism of Glutathione S-transferase M1,T1, P1 and Susceptibility to Bladder Cancer

CYP1B1 Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Polymorphism of the PAI-1gene (4G/5G) may be linked with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and associated pregnancy disorders in South Indian Women

TITLE: CYP1B1 Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Race-Related Prostate Cancer

accesalabs.c

Myoglobin A79G polymorphism association with exercise-induced skeletal muscle damage

Genetic polymorphisms in the drug detoxification genes and susceptibility to Urinary Bladder Cancer (UBC)

Interaction between CYP 2C19*3 polymorphism and smoking in relation to laryngeal carcinoma in the Chinese Han population

GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND THE RISK OF LUNG CANCER IN TUNNEL WORKERS IN RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL

Association of polymorphisms of the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F gene with increased glioma risk

Influence of interleukin-18 gene polymorphisms on acute pancreatitis susceptibility in a Chinese population

Association between the pre-mir-196a2 rs polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility in a Chinese population

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES

Association between MTHFR 677C/T and 1298A/C gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk

Original Article The programmed death-1 gene polymorphism (PD-1.5 C/T) is associated with non-small cell lung cancer risk in a Chinese Han population

Investigation on the role of XPG gene polymorphisms in breast cancer risk in a Chinese population

A common genetic variant of 5p15.33 is associated with risk for prostate cancer in the Chinese population

IL-17 rs genetic variation contributes to the development of gastric cancer in a Chinese population

Genetic association study of CYP1A1 polymorphisms identifies risk haplotypes in nonsmall cell lung cancer

Detection of Cytochrome P450 Polymorphisms in Breast Cancer Patients May Impact on Tamoxifen Therapy

RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

H.F. Liu, J.S. Liu, J.H. Deng and R.R. Wu. Corresponding author: J.S. Liu

PHASE I Detoxification: The First Line of Defense

Influence of the c.1517g>c genetic variant in the XRCC1 gene on pancreatic cancer susceptibility in a Chinese population

Welcome to your dna oestrogen report

RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Association between GSTM1 polymorphisms and lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis

Gene-Environment Interactions

( ) 95% 34 7,281 9, ; CI ; P=

Original Policy Date

Association between matrix metalloproteinase-9 rs polymorphism and development of coronary artery disease in a Chinese population

=0.019; homozygote: OR=0.51, 95%CI= , P OR. =0.011; dominant: OR=0.733, 95%CI= , P OR

Genetic variability of DNA repair mechanisms in chemotherapy treatment outcome of gastric cancer patients

Influence of interleukin-17 gene polymorphisms on the development of pulmonary tuberculosis

Lack of association of IL-2RA and IL-2RB polymorphisms with rheumatoid arthritis in a Han Chinese population

The GSTP1 A1578G polymorphism and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from an updated meta-analysis

XRCC1 Polymorphisms and Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Prevalence of CTR1 and ERCC1 Polymorphisms and Response of Biliary Tract Cancer to Gemcitabine-Platinum Chemotherapy

Environmental Management & Pollution Environmental and Chemical Carcinogenesis

Association between interleukin-17a polymorphism and coronary artery disease susceptibility in the Chinese Han population

Frequency of glutathione-s-transferase null-m1 and null-t1 genotypes among the Turabah population in Saudi Arabia

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Lack of Association between the COMT rs4680 Polymorphism and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Evidence from a Meta-analysis of 3,940 Individuals

Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and risk of bladder cancer in Thais

CYP1A1, GSTM1 and NQO1 gene polymorphisms: Genetic risk factors for small cell lung cancer

CYP1A1 Ile462Val Polymorphism as a Risk Factor in Cervical Cancer Development in the Polish Population

Polymorphisms of XPC Gene And Susceptibility of Esophageal Cancer

Genetic polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTP1 in lung cancer in Egypt

Genomics and proteomics offers new hopes towards a personalized approach to lung cancer prevention and treatment

Role of TGFB1 polymorphism in the development of metastatic brain tumors in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Association of CYP3A5*3 and CYP1A1*2C Polymorphism with Development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Egyptian Patients

Supplementary Figure 1. Principal components analysis of European ancestry in the African American, Native Hawaiian and Latino populations.

Cytochrome P4501A1 polymorphism as a susceptibility factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal Chinese women in Taiwan

Matrix metalloproteinase variants associated with risk and clinical outcome of esophageal cancer

Systematic review on the association between ERCC1 rs and ERCC2 rs13181 polymorphisms and glioma risk

Association of DNA Double strand Break Gene XRCC6 Genotypes and Lung Cancer in Taiwan

Original Article Association between XRCC1 and ERCC2 gene. polymorphisms and development of osteosarcoma.

Relationship between CYP17 gene polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer

CYP1A2 polymorphism in Chinese patients with acute liver injury induced by Polygonum multiflorum

Association between the CYP11B2 gene 344T>C polymorphism and coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

Transcription:

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/0.734/APJCP.203.4.6.3925 RESEARCH ARTICLE CYPA (Ile 462 Val), CYPB (Ala 9 Ser and Val 432 Leu), GSTM (null), and GSTT (null) Polymorphisms and Bladder Cancer Risk in a Turkish Population Ufuk Berber *, Ismail Yilmaz, Omer Yilmaz 2, Aptullah Haholu, Zafer Kucukodaci, Ferhat Ates 2, Dilaver Demirel Abstract We aimed to investigate bladder cancer risk with reference to polymorphic variants of cytochrome p450 (CYP) A, CYPB, glutathione S-transferase (GST) M, and GSTT genes in a case control study. Polymorphisms were examined in 4 bladder cancer patients and 4 age and sex-matched cancer-free subjects. Genotypes were determined using allele specific PCR for CYPA and CYPB genes, and by multiplex PCR and melting curve analysis for GSTM and GSTT genes. Our results revealed a statistically significant increased bladder cancer risk for GSTT null genotype carriers with an odds ratio of 3.06 (95% confidence interval=.39-6.74, p=0.006). Differences of CYPA, CYPB and GSTM genotype frequencies were not statistically significant between patients and controls. However, the specific combination of GSTM null, GSTT null, and CYPB codon 9 risk allele carriers and specific combination of GSTM present, GSTT null, and CYPB 432 risk allele carriers exhibited increased cancer risk in the combined analysis. We did not observe any association between different genotype groups and prognostic tumor characteristics of bladder cancer. Our results indicate that inherited absence of GSTT gene may be associated with bladder cancer susceptibility, and specific combinations of GSTM, GSTT and CYPB gene polymorphisms may modify bladder cancer risk in the Turkish population, without any association being observed for CYPA gene polymorphism and bladder cancer risk. Keywords: Bladder cancer - CYPA - CYPB - GSTM - GSTT Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 4 (6), 3925-3929 Introduction Cytochrome p450 (CYP), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene superfamilies encode metabolic enzymes which play a major role in cellular detoxification mechanism. They catalyze reactions with common carcinogens that have been claimed to involve in bladder cancer (BC) etiology such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and aminobiphenyls (Boffetta et al., 997; Feng et al., 2002). Single nucleotide polymorphisms and inherited loss of both alleles are common in these gene superfamilies with varying frequencies among different populations (Senthilkumar and Thirumurugan, 202; Sharma et al., 202; Zhou et al., 202). These genetic alterations lead to a change or complete loss in activity of the corresponding enzymes and result in impaired cellular detoxification which give rise to a loss in cancer prevention mechanisms. Chemical carcinogens are mostly activated to electrophilic reactive forms that can cause DNA damage by phase I enzymes. These intermediate products are subsequently deactivated by phase II enzymes (Turesky and Le Marchand, 20). Since activities of phase I and phase II enzymes are affected by genetic variations, the polymorphic enzyme variants in metabolic pathways are supposed to be responsible for the difference in cancer development risk between different individuals. CYPA and CYPB enzymes belong to cytochrome p450 enzyme family, and they are responsible for the activation of procarcinogens to reactive metabolites (Turesky and Le Marchand, 20). CYPA gene Ile 462 Val polymorphism and CYPB gene Ala 9 Ser and Val 432 Leu variants are linked to increased risk for developing lung, bladder, and head and neck cancers (Bartsch et al., 2000; Ji et al., 202; Salinas-Sanchez et al., 202; Shukla et al., 202 ). GSTM and GSTT genes are also implied to be predisposing risk factors for several cancer types due to the inherited loss of both alleles (null genotype) that result in complete lack of enzymatic activity. However, the data about these metabolic gene polymorphisms and their relevance to BC development is limited in Turkish population. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the association between CYPA, CYPB, GSTM and GSTT gene polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk in a Turkish population. Pathology Department, 2 Urology Department, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Istanbul, Turkey *For correspondence: patologub@gmail.com Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 4, 203 3925

Ufuk Berber et al Materials and Methods Patients and controls With the approval from Institutional Ethics Comittee (Reference number: 202-04), we selected 4 cancerfree control individuals (03 male, female) and 4 histologically diagnosed BC patients (03 male, female) for this study which was performed in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki and informed consents were obtained from the participants appropriately. Patients with any cancer at other body sides were excluded from the study. Clinical and demographic data including gender, age, smoking status, pathologic tumor stage and tumor grades were obtained for statistical analysis. All of the patients and control subjects were of Turkish origin. DNA isolation and genotyping assays Genomic DNA was isolated from formallin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) nontumoral bladder tissues for BC patients by using QIAamp DNA FFPE tissue kit (Qiagen); and from blood buffy coat for control group by using QIAamp Mini kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer s instructions. Ile 462 Val polymorphism (rs048943) variants in CYPA gene (Unigene ID: Hs.7292) were determined by allele specific PCR (ASPCR) as previously described (Hirvonen et al., 992). Two primers; 5 -AAGACCTCCCAGCGGGCAAT-3 and 5 -AAGACCTCCCAGCGGGCAAC-3 with different bases at 3 end corresponding to A to G transition in exon 7 were enrolled with a common reverse primer (5 -GAAAGGCTGGGTCCACCCTCT-3 ). PCR was performed at 94 C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94 C for 30 sec, 65 C for 45 sec, 72 C for 30 sec and CYPB (UniGene ID Hs.54654) polymorphism variants in codon 9 (rs056827) were determined by ASPCR as previously described (Tanaka et al., 2002). Primers; 5 -GGCCTTCGCCGACCGGCCGG-3 and 5 -GGCCTTCGCCGACCGGCCGT-3 with different bases at 3 end corresponding to G to T transition were enrolled with a common reverse primer (5 -GAAGTTGCGCATCATGCTGT-3 ). PCR was performed at 94 C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 C for 30 sec, 69 C for 30 sec, 72 C for 30 sec and CYPB gene Leu432Val polymorphism (rs056836) was determined by ASPCR method as described (Tanaka et al., 2002). Primers; 5 -TCCGGGTTAGGCCACTTCAG-3 and 5 - TCCGGGTTAGGCCACTTCAC-3 with different bases at 3 end were used to detect C to G transition with a common reverse primer (5 -TATGGAGCACACCTCACCTG-3 ). PCR was performed at 94 C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94 C for 30 sec, 60 C for 30 sec, 72 C for 30 sec and After amplification of CYPA and CYPB genes, all PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel to visualize the generated bands that correspond to prevalent or rare alleles. Deletions in both alleles of GSTM (UniGene ID 3926 Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 4, 203 Hs.3096) and GSTT (UniGene ID Hs.268573) genes were screened by multiplex PCR and melting curve analysis method as previously described (Marin et al., 200). Primers for GSTM gene were 5 -GAACTCCCTGAAAAGCTAAAGC-3 and 5 - GTTGGGCTCAAATATACGGTGG-3. For amplification of GSTT gene, 5 - TTCCTTACTGGTCCTCACATCTC-3 and 5 - GGAAAAGGGTACAGACTGGGGA-3 primers were used. The primer pairs were mixed in a single tube. With this approach both amplicons served as an internal control in each tube for PCR efficiency. In cases with no amplification was observed (ie. null - null genotype), seperate PCR amplifications were performed for both genes using bcl2 as an internal control gene to evaluate the DNA integrity. Amplification protocol was consisted of an activation step at 94 C for 5 minutes and 40 cycles with amplification steps at 94 C, 62 C, and 72 C for 30 sec each. Amplifications were carried out on RotorGene Q 5-Plex (Qiagen) in a final volume of 25 µl containing 40-00 ng of genomic DNA. Amplified products were determined by visual analysis of melting curves generated between 65 C to 95 C at a ramping rate of 0. C/sec. Statistical analysis The genotype distributions of CYPA and CYPB genes among control subjects were analysed by chi-square test to determine whether they were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Continious variables were compared by t test between patient and control groups. The estimates of associations between each genotype and susceptibility to BC risk were obtained from unconditional logistic regression models using odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for sex, smoking habit, and age with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Cancer risk for specific genotype combinations of GSTM and GSTT genes were assessed by stratifying genotypes into four groups, as wild for both (+/+) (reference category), wild/null (+/-), null/wild (-/+), and null for both (-/-). The effects of CYPA and CYPB genotypes on BC risk for combined GST genotype groups were also analysed by stratifying cancer patients and controls to have a risk allele for each CYP gene or not. Pathological tumor stages were dichotomised as non-invasive (stage pta) vs. invasive (stages pt-pt4) for statistical analysis. The associations of different genotypes with histological tumor grades and tumor stages were tested using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software version.5, and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results CYPA Ile 462 Val, CYPB Ala 9 Ser and Val 432 Leu, GSTM null and GSTT null genotypes were analysed in 4 BC patients and 4 control subjects. Baseline characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table. The mean age was 65.±9.25 for BC patients, and 63.2±5.75 for control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). There were more smokers in the BC patient group (n=97) than in control group (n=54) (p<0.0). For histological grading, 62 (54.4%)

patients had low grade, and 52 (45.6%) patients had high grade urothelial carcinomas. As for pathological tumor staging, 69 (60.5%) patients had stage pta, 32 (28.%) had stage pt, and 3 (.4%) had stage pt2 tumors. Genotype frequencies in case and control groups and their relation to BC risk are shown in Table 2. Among controls, the genotype distributions of CYPA and CYPB polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Distributions of CYPA, CYPB codon 9 and GSTM genotypes were similar in case and control groups. For CYPB codon 432 polymorphism, risk allele was slightly more common in patient group with an OR of.40 (95%CI: 0.77-2.57) (p=0.22). The frequency of GSTT null genotype was significantly higher in BC cases (27.2%) than in controls (4.0%) with an OR of 3.08 (95%CI:.40-6.78) (p=0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between different genotype groups of BC patients with regard to tumor grades or tumor stages (all p>0.05). As presented in Table 3, the results of combined GSTM and GSTT genotype analysis revealed that GSTT null genotype was significantly associated with increased BC risk, irrespective of the GSTM genotype Table. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population Characteristic Controls BC patients p value (n=4) (n=4) no (%) no (%) DOI:http://dx.doi.org/0.734/APJCP.203.4.6.3925 Table 3. Odds Ratios and 95%CIs in BC Patients and Controls for Combined Genotypes of GSTM and GSTT Genes and Significant Associations with CYP Genes Genotype Controls BC patients OR* 95%CI p value n (%) n (%) GSTM/GSTT +/+ 54 (47.4) 40 (35.).00 (reference) -/+ 44 (38.6) 43 (37.7).27 0.65-2.46 0.48 +/- 9 (7.89) 20 (7.5) 3.64.32-0.0 0.0 -/- 7 (6.4) (9.64) 3.23 0.99-0.5 0.05 00.0 GSTM/GSTT/CYPB (9G/T) +/+/GG 25 (2.9) 7 (4.9).00 (reference) -/-/GT+TT (0.88) 5 (4.39) 8.9.65-27.9 0.02 GSTM/GSTT/CYPB (432C/G) +/+/CC 3 (27.2) 23 (20.2).00 (reference) -/-/CG+GG 3 (2.63) 5 (3.2) 9.07.97-4.9 0.005 *Odds ratio adjusted for age and smoking status. n: Number; BC: Bladder cancer; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval status. In the analysis for combined effects of CYP polymorphisms on GSTM/GSTT genotypes, two specific combinations were significantly associated with elevated risk for BC (Table 3). The highest OR was observed for GSTM null, GSTT null, and CYPB codon 9 risk allele carriers (OR=8.9, 95%CI:.65-27.9) (p=0.02). In addition, the OR for BC risk was 9.07 0 (95%CI:.97-4.9) in GSTM present, GSTT null, and CYPB codon 432 risk allele carriers (p<0.0). CYPA polymorphic variants did not exhibit an elevated BC risk in the combined analysis. Age (years) 0.055 Mean±sd 63.2±5.75 65.±9.25 Discussion Range 49-80 44-87 Gender Male 03 (90.4) 03 (90.4).00 Urothelial tumorigenesis is a complex, multistep and Female (9.6) (9.6) Smoking habit Ever 54 (47.4) 97 (85.) 0.00 multifactorial event, in which different somatic mutations, Never 60 (52.6) 7 (4.9) 00.0toxic carcinogenic chemicals, and inflammatory agents are Tumor grade Low 62 (54.4) implied to play a role in its ethiogenesis (Lopez-Beltran High 52 (45.6) 6.3 0. et al., 2008; Botelho et al., 20.3 200; Pollard et al., 200). Tumor stage Non-invasive (pta) 69 (60.5) Invasive (pt-pt4) 45 (39.5) Cigarette smoking is one of the major environmental risk 75.0 factors for BC due to the presence of procarcinogens in Table 2. The Frequency Distributions of Studied Gene tobacco. However, besides the strong association between 56.3 46.8 Polymorphisms and Their Odds Ratios and 95%CIs cigarette smoking and urothelial carcinogenesis, BC do 50.0not develop in majority of 54.2 for BC Risk in Case and Control Groups the smokers. This finding suggests a crucial role for carcinogen metabolism and Genotype Controls BC patients OR* 95%CI p value n (%) n (%) DNA repair pathways to modify the BC risk among different individuals. CYPA AA 95 (83.3) 92 (80.7) (reference) AG 8 (5.8) 20 (7.5).2 0.52-2.78 0.66 The cascade of 38.0 procarcinogen metabolism starting with activation of xenobiotics to genotoxic GG (0.88) 2 (.75).30 0.-5.9 0.84 23.7 intermediate AG+GG 9 (6.7) 22 (9.3).7 0.53-2.58 0.69 products, followed by conversion to less toxic diols and CYPB (9G/T) 0finally to nontoxic compounds is a complex process. GG 60 (52.6) 58 (50.9) (reference) GT 44 (38.6) 45 (39.5). 0.58-2.2 0.7600.0While the activating polymorphisms in phase I enzymes TT 0 (8.77) (9.65).3 0.43-3.55 0.70 are resulted in accumulation of intracellular genotoxic 6.3 GT+TT 54 (47.4) 56 (49.).0 0.60-2.00 0.77 0. metabolites, conversely a decrease 20.3 or loss in ezymatic CYPB (432C/G) activity of phase II enzymes by polymorphic variants CC 65 (57.0) 58 (48.9) (reference) 75.0 CG 37 (32.5) 4 (36.0). 0.4-2.99 0.84 lead to a less effective removal of these activated toxic GG 2 (0.5) 5 (3.).53 0.78-2.99 0.22 metabolites. Ile 462 Val polymorphism occurs near the 46.8 CG+GG 49 (43.0) 56 (49.).40 0.77-2.57 0.27 catalytic 56.3 region of the CYPA enzyme, and results GSTM Present 63 (55.3) 60 (52.6) (reference) 50.0in a 2-fold elevated enzymatic 54.2 activity in variant Null 5 (44.7) 54 (47.4).20 0.66-2.2 0.55 genotype (Bartsch et al., 2000). Ala 9 GSTT Present 98 (86.0) 83 (72.8) (reference) Ser, and Val 432 Leu Null 6 (4.0) 3 (27.2) 3.08.40-6.78 0.005 polymorphisms in CYPB gene also lead to the formation *Odds ratio adjusted for age and smoking status. n: Number; BC: Bladder cancer; of variant enzymes with increased enzymatic activities OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval (Hanna et al., 2000). As presumed, variant genotypes 38.0 Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 23.7 Vol 4, 203 3927 Newly diagnosed without treatment Newly diagnosed with treatment Persistence or recurrence Remission 75.0 50.0 None 6. 6 56 3 5 3 5 3 0 ent ent nce sion one

Ufuk Berber et al of these phase I enzymes were found to be associated with increased risk for several cancer types (Bartsch et al., 2000). In contrast to phase I enzymes, predicting the net effect of GSTM and GSTT enzymes in cancer susceptibility is difficult due to their multifunctional roles in metabolic pathways. Although, they are primarily involved in detoxification of intermediate products, they also participate in the activation of procarcinogens to genotoxic metabolites such as halogenated alkanes (Rebbeck et al., 2009). Since activation and detoxification of carcinogens are mainly influenced by the activity of phase I and phase II enzymes, we aimed to investigate whether polymorphisms of CYPA, CYPB, GSTM and GSTT genes modify the BC risk in a Turkish population. All selected genes encode enzymes which are participated in metabolism of xenobiotics known to be related with urothelial carcinogenesis as candidates for cancer susceptibility. CYPA Ile 462 Val polymorphic variants are mostly linked to tobacco related cancers such as lung and esophageal cancer in different ethnic populations (Yang et al., 2005; Dong et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2008). In contrast, the results of previous studies among Turkish population demonstrated increased risks for developing ovarian and prostatic carcinomas (Aktas et al., 2002; 2004) but no association was detected with lung cancer (Atinkaya et al., 202). The results of our study also did not reveal an increased risk of BC for CYPA Ile 462 Val variant genotype. In addition, CYPA gene transcription is proposed to be strongly induced by 2,4,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin in GSTM null genotype carriers which may lead to an additive risk for cancer development in CYPA variant genotype. However, combined genotype analysis also did not demonstrate an increased risk for GSTM null and CYPA variant allele carriers. We found no difference in frequencies of CYPB Ile9Val genotypes between BC patients and controls. Studies on Val 432 Leu polymorphism of CYPB gene reported inconsistent results with respect to the BC risk. Our data, however, suggest that Val 432 Leu polymorphism in CYPB gene does not associate with an increased risk for BC development. We did not observe an increased BC risk between null and wild types of GSTM gene. In previous studies, while some investigators reported an association between null genotype and overall BC risk (Toruner et al., 200; Cengiz et al., 2007), another did not (Altayli et al., 2009). GSTT null genotype was reported to be associated with increased BC risk among smokers in Turkish population (Altayli et al., 2009). Our results strongly support the predisposing role of GSTT null genotype for BC development in Turkish population, too. We also searched for the combined effects of selected polymorphisms for cancer susceptibility and their association between tumor grades and tumor stages in BC. The combination of the two high-risk GST genotypes (GSTM/GSTT double null) increased BC risk with an OR of 3.23. However, OR for BC risk was 3.64 for patients with GSTM present/gstt null genotype. These findings suggest that BC risk was mainly influenced by GSTT null genotype, irrespective of the GSTM 3928 Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 4, 203 status. The data of the present study revealed potantial increased cancer risks for two additional specific genotype combinations: GSTM null, GSTT null, and CYPB codon 9 risk allele carriers exhibited the highest risk with an OR of 8.9. Secondly, the OR for BC risk was 9.07 (95%CI:.97-4.9) in GSTM present, GSTT null, and CYPB codon 432 risk allele carriers. In a previous study, GSTM null and GSTM/GSTT double null genotypes were reported to be significantly associated with tumor grade of BC in Chinese population (Song et al., 2009). In that study also a significant association was found between NAT2 slow-acetylator genotype and higher tumor stage in BC patients (Song et al., 2009). However, we found that none of the studied genotypes were associated with tumor grade or tumor stage in Turkish BC patients. In conclusion, our results indicate that inherited absence of both alleles in GSTT gene, and specific combinations of GSTM, GSTT and CYPB gene polymorphisms may increase bladder cancer risk in Turkish population, but no association was observed with CYPA gene polymorphism, either alone or in combined genotype analysis. References Aktas D, Guney I, Alikasifoglu M, et al (2002). CYPA gene polymorphism and risk of epithelial ovarian neoplasm. Gynecol Oncol, 86, 24-8. Aktas D, Hascicek M, Sozen S, et al (2004). CYPA and GSTM polymorphic genotypes in patients with prostate cancer in a Turkish population. Cancer Gene Cytogenet, 54, 8-5. Altayli E, Gunes S, Yilmaz AF, Goktas S, Bek Y (2009). CYPA2, CYP2D6, GSTM, GSTP, and GSTT gene polymorphisms in patients with bladder cancer in a Turkish population. Int Urol Nephrol, 4, 259-66. Atinkaya C, Taspinar M, Sakiragaoglu S, et al (202). The effect of CYPA, GSTT and GSTM polymorphisms on the risk of lung cancer: a case-control study. Hum Exp Toxicol, 3, 074-80. Bartsch H, Nair U, Risch A, et al (2000). Genetic polymorphism of CYP genes, alone or in combination, as a risk modifier of tobacco-related cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 9, 3-28. Boffetta P, Jourenkova N, Gustavsson P (997). Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Causes Control, 8, 444-72. Botelho MC, Machado JC, da Costa JMC (200). Schistosoma haematobium and bladder cancer. What lies beneath? Virulence,, 84-7. Cengiz M, Ozaydin A, Ozkilic AC, Dedekarginoglu G (2007). The investigation of GSTT, GSTM and SOD polymorphism in bladder cancer patients. Int Urol Nephrol, 39, 043-8. Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, et al (2008). Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. JAMA, 299, 2423-36. Fatima M, García N, Munoz X, et al (200). Simultaneous genotyping of GSTT and GSTM null polymorphisms by melting curve analysis in presence of SYBR Green I. J Mol Diagn, 2, 300-4. Feng Z, Hu W, Rom WN, Beland FA, Tang MS (2002). 4-Aminobiphenyl is a major etiological agent of human bladder cancer: evidence from its DNA binding spectrum

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/0.734/APJCP.203.4.6.3925 in human p53 gene. Carcinogenesis, 23, 72-7. and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 3, 365-72. Hanna IH, Dawling S, Roodi N, Guengerich FP, Parl FF (2000). Cytochrome P450 B (CYPB) pharmacogenetics: association of polymorphisms with functional differences in estrogen hydroxylation activity. Cancer Res, 60, 3440-4. Hirvonen A, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, Karjalainen A, Anttila S, Vainio H (992). Point-mutational MspI and Ile±Val polymorphisms closely linked in the CYPA gene: lack of association with susceptibility to lung cancer in a Finnish study population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,, 485-9. Ji YN, Wang Q, Suo LJ (202). CYPA Ile 462 Val polymorphism contributes to lung cancer susceptibility among lung squamous carcinoma and smokers: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 7, 43397. Lee KM, Kang D, Clapper ML, et al (2008). CYPA, GSTM, and GSTT polymorphisms, smoking, and lung cancer risk in a pooled analysis among asian populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 7, 20-6. Lopez-beltran A, Cheng L, Mazzucchelli R, et al (2008). Morphological and molecular profiles and pathways in bladder neoplasms. Anticancer Res, 28, 2893-900. Pollard C, Smith SC, Theodorescu D (200). Molecular genesis of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (NMIUC). Expert Rev Mol Med, 2, 0. Rebbeck TR, Walker AH, Jaffe JM, et al (999). Glutathione S-transferase-μ (GSTM) and -θ (GSTT) genotypes in the etiology of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 8, 283-7. Salinas-Sanchez AS, Donate-Moreno MJ, López-Garrido MP, Giménez-Bachs JM, Escribano J (202). Role of CYPB gene polymorphisms in bladder cancer cusceptibility. J Urol, 87, 700-6. Senthilkumar KP, Thirumurugan R (202). GSTM and GSTT allele frequencies among various Indian and non-indian ethnic groups. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 3, 6263-7. Sharma A, Pandey A, Sardana S, et al (202). Genetic polymorphisms of GSTM and GSTT genes in Delhi and comparison with other Indian and global populations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 3, 5647-52. Shukla D, Dinesh KA, Hallikerimath S, Vivekanandhan S, Venkatakanthaiah Y (202). Genetic polymorphism of drug metabolizing enzymes (GSTM and CYPA) as risk factors for oral premalignant lesions and oral cancer. Biomedical Papers, 56, 253-9. Song DK, Xing DL, Zhang LR, et al (2009). Association of NAT2, GSTM, GSTT, CYP2A6, and CYP2A3 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility and clinicopathologic characteristics of bladder cancer in central China. Cancer Detection and Prev, 32, 46-23. Tanaka Y, Sasaki M, Kaneuchi M, et al (2002). Polymorphisms of the CYPB gene have higher risk for prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 296, 820-6. Toruner GA, Akyerli C, Ucar A, et al (200). Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase genes (GSTM, GSTP and GSTT) and bladder cancer susceptibility in Turkish population. Arch Toxicol, 75, 459-64. Turesky RJ, Le Marchand L (20). Metabolism and biomarkers of heterocyclic aromatic amines in molecular epidemiology studies: lessons learned from aromatic amines. Chem Res Toxicol, 24, 69-24. Yang CX, Matsuo K, Wang ZM, Tajima K (2005). Phase I/II enzyme gene polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of the literature. World J Gastroenterol,, 253-8. Zhou LP, Luan H, Dong XH, et al (202). Genetic variants of CYP2D6 gene and cancer risk: a HuGE systematic review Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 4, 203 3929