Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Similar documents
Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

IR Thematic Call on Alirocumab. September 2 nd, 2014

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia not on Statin Therapy: the ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study

ADVANCES IN CARDIAC ARRHYTMIAS AND GREAT INNOVATIONS IN CARDIOLOGY Torino, October 13 15, 2016

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

ABSTRACT. n engl j med 372;16 nejm.org april 16,

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

PCSK9 Inhibitors: A View of Clinical Studies

What Role do the New PCSK9 Inhibitors Have in Lipid Lowering Treatment?

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

Alirocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

Effect of alirocumab on the frequency of lipoprotein apheresis: A randomised Phase III trial

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template

Patient and Physician Perspectives on Administration of the PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody Alirocumab, an Injectable Medication to Lower LDL-C Levels

PCSK9 inhibition across a wide spectrum of patients: One size fits all?

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

New Approaches to Lower LDL-C

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

Inhibition of PCSK9: The Birth of a New Therapy

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

Accepted Manuscript. S (18) Reference: JACL To appear in:

Management of LDL as a Risk Factor. Raul D. Santos MD, PhD Heart Institute-InCor University of Sao Paulo Brazil

The ACCELERATE Trial

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

ClinialTrials.gov Identifier: sanofi-aventis. Sponsor/company: 07/November/2008

PCSK9 for LDL Cholesterol Reduction: What have we learned from clinical trials?

FOURIER STUDY GREYLOCK PRESS: CTS PRODUCT SAMPLE - FOURIER YES. Did the study achieve its main objective?

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

PCSK9 antibodies: A new therapeutic option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Expert Meeting on Large Simple Trials (LST s)

J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. European Society of Cardiology August 26 th 2018

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

*Carbohydrate & Lipid Metabolism Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Trial

Study 1 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Long-Term Safety Study Top-Line Results

Get a Statin or Not? Learning objectives. Presentation overview 4/3/2018. Treatment Strategies in Dyslipidemia Management

Should I use statins?

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Hyperlipidemia Guidelines: What s New in 2015? Eva Lonn, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine

March 30, 2014, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 402 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Drug Class Monograph

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Impact of a 1- or 2-dose starting regimen of inclisiran, a novel sirna inhibitor to PCSK9 on time averaged LDL-C reductions over 1 year

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

Introduction. Harold E. Bays 1 & Robert S. Rosenson 2 & Marie T. Baccara-Dinet 3 & Michael J. Louie 4 & Desmond Thompson 4 & G.

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Evolving Concepts on Lipid Management from Ezetimibe (IMPROVE IT) to PCSK9 Inhibitors

Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects (GAUSS): Results from a

Management of Dyslipidaemias: PCSK9 Inhibition. Alberico L. Catapano Professor President EAS University of Milano Italy

Case Study. Case Study. Case Study

CCC Dyslipidemia Lipid lowering/atherosclerosis clinical trials update. November 17 th, 2018

New Horizons in Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

Patient Action Sets. Allscripts Touchworks ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

After acute coronary syndromes patients continue to have recurrent ischemic events despite revascularization and dual antiplatelet therapy

A.K. Gitt, F. Towae, C. Juenger, A. Papp, R. Zahn, U. Zeymer, J. Senges For the STAR-Study-Group Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Germany

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

Accumulating Clinical data on PCSK9 Inhibition: Key Lessons and Challenges

Patient Lists. Epic ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information

Disclosures. Objectives 2/11/2017

Beyond HDL: new therapeutic targets

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

Patient List Inquiries

PCSK9 Inhibitors Current Status

PCSK9 Inhibitors Current Status

NEWS BRIEFING Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Moderated by: Robert Eckel, MD University of Colorado

Inclisiran lowers LDL-C and PCSK9 irrespective of diabetes status without worsening glycemia

Results of the GLAGOV Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab 150 mg Every 4 Weeks in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not on Statin Therapy: The ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

PCSK9 Inhibitors: Promise or Pitfall?

Patient Lists. Allscripts Professional ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Similar risk of malignancy with insulin glargine and neutral protamine Hagedorn

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Confusion about guidelines: How should we treat lipids?

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SR EFC10139 Version number: 1 (electronic 2.0)

Nephrologisches Zentrum Göttingen GbR Priv. Doz. Dr. med. V. Schettler

4 th and Goal To Go How Low Should We Go? :

Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia have

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template

LO MEJOR DE EL ACC.16 CARDIOMETABOLICO

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SR EFC5826 Version number: 1 (electronic 2.0)

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

Praluent (alirocumab)

Transcription:

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab versus placebo in high cardiovascular risk patients: first results from the ODYSSEY LONG TERM study in 2,341 patients Jennifer G. Robinson, 1 Michel Farnier, 2 Michel Krempf, 3 Jean Bergeron, 4 Gérald Luc, 5 Maurizio Averna, 6 Erik Stroes, 7 Gisle Langslet, 8 Frederick J. Raal, 9 Mahfouz El Shahawy, 10 Michael J. Koren, 11 Norman Lepor, 12 Christelle Lorenzato, 13 Robert Pordy, 14 Umesh Chaudhari, 15 John J.P. Kastelein 7 1 University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 2 Point Médical, Dijon, France; 3 CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Nord Laennec, Saint- Herblain, France; 4 Clinique des Maladies Lipidiques de Quebec Inc., Quebec, Canada; 5 University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France; 6 Università di Palermo Policlinico P.Giaccone, Palermo, Italy; 7 Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 8 Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 9 University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 10 Cardiovascular Center of Sarasota, Sarasota, FL, USA; 11 Jacksonville Center For Clinical Research, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 12 Westside Medical Associates of Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, CA, USA; 13 Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France; 14 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA; 15 Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations Author Jennifer G. Robinson Michel Farnier Michel Krempf Jean Bergeron Gérald Luc Maurizio Averna Erik Stroes Gisle Langslet Frederick J. Raal Mahfouz El Shahawy Michael J. Koren Norman Lepor Christelle Lorenzato Robert Pordy Umesh Chaudhari John J.P. Kastelein 2 Disclosure Research Grant; Significant; Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Genentech/Hoffman La Roche, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Merck, Regeneron/Sanofi, Zinfandel/Takeda. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Amgen, Hoffman LaRoche, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi. Other Research Support; Significant; Amgen, Merck, Sanofi. Speakers Bureau; Modest; Amgen, Sanofi. Speakers Bureau; Significant; Merck. Honoraria; Modest; Abbott, Eli Lilly, Pfizer. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; AstraZeneca, Roche, Kowa, Recordati, SMB. Consultant/Advisory Board; Significant; Amgen, Sanofi, Merck. Grants, consulting fees and/or honoraria and delivering lectures for Abbott, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Merck and Co, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Amgen (Canada), Sanofi (Canada). Other; Modest; Educational lecture to GPs for Merck (Canada), Valeant. Honoraria; Modest; Regeneron, Sanofi. Research Grant; Significant; MSD. Speakers Bureau; Modest; Aegerion, Sanofi, Amgen, MSD, Chiesi, Mediolanum, AstraZeneca. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Aegerion, Sanofi, Amgen, MSD, Chiesi, Mediolanum, AZ, Kowa, Roche. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; MSD, Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Torrent. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Research Grant; Modest; Amgen, Sanofi/Regeneron. Speakers Bureau; Modest; Amgen, Sanofi/Regeneron, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. Honoraria; Modest; Amgen, Sanofi/Regeneron, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Amgen, Sanofi/Regeneron, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. None. Research Grant; Significant; Regeneron/Sanofi. Consultant/Advisory Board; Significant; Regeneron/Sanofi. Other Research Support; Significant; Clinical Trial Investigator. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Sanofi. Employee of Sanofi. Employee of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee of Sanofi. Honoraria; Modest; Dezima Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Genzyme, Aegerion, Esperion. Honoraria; Significant; Isis. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Dezima Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Genzyme, Aegerion, Esperion. Consultant/Advisory Board; Significant; Isis. 1

Overview of the ODYSSEY Phase 3 Programme Fourteen global Phase 3 trials including >23 500 patients across >2000 study centres HeFH population HC in high CV-risk population Additional populations Add-on to max tolerated statin (± other LLT) ODYSSEY FH I (NCT01623115; EFC12492) n=486; 18 months ODYSSEY FH II (NCT01709500; CL1112) n=249; 18 months Add-on to max tolerated statin (± other LLT) ODYSSEY COMBO I (NCT01644175; EFC11568) n=316; 12 months *ODYSSEY COMBO II (NCT01644188; EFC11569) n=720; 24 months ODYSSEY MONO (NCT01644474; EFC11716) Patients on no background LLTs LDL-C 100 mg/dl n=103; 6 months ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE (NCT01709513; CL1119) Patients with defined statin intolerance n=314; 6 months ODYSSEY HIGH FH (NCT01617655; EFC12732) LDL-C 160 mg/dl n=107; 18 months ODYSSEY OLE (NCT01954394; LTS 13463) Open-label study for FH from EFC 12492, CL 1112, EFC 12732 or LTS 11717 n 1000; 30 months ODYSSEY CHOICE I (NCT01926782; CL1308) n=700; 12 months ODYSSEY LONG TERM (NCT01507831; LTS11717) LDL-C 70 mg/dl n=2,341; 18 months ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (NCT01663402; EFC11570) LDL-C 70 mg/dl n=18,000; 64 months ODYSSEY CHOICE II (NCT02023879; EFC13786) Patients not treated with a statin n=200; 6 months ODYSSEY OPTIONS I (NCT01730040; CL1110) Patients not at goal on moderate-dose atorvastatin n=355; 6 months ODYSSEY OPTIONS II (NCT01730053; CL1118) Patients not at goal on moderate-dose rosuvastatin n=305; 6 months 3 *For ODYSSEY COMBO II other LLT not allowed at entry. ODYSSEY LONG TERM Study Design HeFH or High CV-risk patients On max-tolerated statin other lipid-lowering therapy LDL-C 1.81 mmol/l [70 mg/dl] Assessments R W0 n=1553 n=788 W4 W8 W12 Double-blind treatment (18 months) 150 mg Q2W SC (single 1-mL injection using prefilled syringe for self-administration) Q2W SC W16 W24 W36 W52 W64 W78 Follow-up (8 weeks) Primary efficacy endpoint Pre-specified analysis Efficacy: All Patients To W52 Safety: Baseline-W78 (all patients at least W52) 4 86% (2011/2341) completed 52 weeks (both treatment arms) 26.1% (405/1553 alirocumab) and 25.6% (202/788 placebo) had completed 78 weeks by time of this analysis Mean treatment duration: 65 weeks (both treatment arms) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01507831. 2

All patients on background of max-tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy (n=1553) Age, years, mean (SD) 60.4 (10.4) 60.6 (10.4) Male, % (n) 63.3% (983) 60.2% (474) Race, White 92.8% (1441) 92.6% (730) BMI, kg/m 2, mean (SD) 30.2 (5.7) 30.5 (5.5) HeFH, % (n) 17.8% (276) 17.6% (139) CHD history, % (n) 67.9% (1055) 70.1% (552) Type 2 diabetes, % (n) 34.9% (542) 33.9% (267) Any statin, % (n) 99.9% (1552) 99.9% (787) High-intensity statin, % (n) 44.4% (690) 43.4% (342) Any LLT other than statins, % (n) 28.1% (437) 27.9% (220) Ezetimibe, % (n) 13.9% (216) 15.0% (118) LDL-C, calculated mean (SD), mmol/l [mg/dl] Baseline Characteristics 3.2 (1.1) [122.7 (42.6)] 3.2 (1.1) [121.9 (41.4)] Patients should receive either rosuvastatin 20-40 mg, atorvastatin 40-80 mg daily, or simvastatin 80 mg daily unless not tolerated and/or appropriate other dose given according to the judgement of the investigator 5 High-intensity statin: atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg daily. Significantly Reduced LDL-C from Baseline to Week 24 versus Primary Endpoint: Percent Change from Baseline to Week 24 in LDL-C All patients on background of maximally-tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy LS mean (SE) % change from baseline to Week 24 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 N=1530 N=780-61.0 0.8 6 Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis LS mean difference (SE) versus placebo: 61.9% (1.3); P<0.0001 3

Maintained Consistent LDL-C Reductions over 52 Weeks Achieved LDL-C Over Time All patients on background of maximally-tolerated statin ±other lipid-lowering therapy LDL-C, LS mean (SE), mmol/l 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 3.1 mmol/l 118.9 mg/dl 1.3 mmol/l 48.3 mg/dl 3.2 mmol/l 123.0 mg/dl 1.4 mmol/l 53.1 mg/dl 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 Week 151 137 123 109 95 81 67 53 39 mg/dl 7 Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis Most Patients Receiving on Background Statin ± Other LLT Achieved LDL-C Goals Proportion of patients reaching LDL-C goal at Week 24 % patients 90 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 81% 79% 80 70 60 50 40 30 Very high-risk: LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) High-risk: <2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) <1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) regardless of risk 20 10 9% 8% 0 8 Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis; LLT = lipid-lowering therapy 4

Significant Reductions in Secondary Lipid Parameters at Week 24 All patients on background of maximally-tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy 10 Non-HDL-C Apo B Lp(a) LS mean (SE) % change from baseline to Week 24 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60 LS mean difference versus placebo: 52% P<0.0001 54% P<0.0001 26% P<0.0001 9 Adjusted mean (SE) shown for Lp(a). Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients who completed W78 visit) All patients on background of max-tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy TEAEs 78.6% (1218) 80.6% (635) Treatment-emergent SAEs 16.5% (255) 17.6% (139) TEAE leading to death 0.5% (7) 1.0% (8) TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation 6.2% (96) 5.5% (43) Mean treatment duration: 65 weeks (both treatment arms) 26.1% (405/1553 alirocumab) and 25.6% (202/788 placebo) completed 78 weeks 10 Statistical analyses have not been performed. 5

11 TEAEs by System-Organ-Class ( 2%) in any Group Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients who completed W78 visit) All patients on background of max-tolerated statin ± other LLT Infections and infestations 45.5% (705) 46.1% (363) Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders 27.2% (422) 28.6% (225) Gastrointestinal disorders 18.6% (288) 18.8% (148) Nervous system disorders 17.0% (264) 17.8% (140) General disorders and administration site conditions 15.4% (238) 17.0% (134) Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications 13.4% (207) 14.2% (112) Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders 11.0% (171) 10.9% (86) Cardiac disorders 9.1% (141) 11.8% (93) Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders 9.1% (141) 8.5% (67) Metabolism and nutrition disorders 9.1% (141) 8.4% (66) Vascular disorders 7.9% (122) 8.9% (70) Eye disorders 6.5% (100) 6.1% (48) Investigations (lab parameters) 6.1% (95) 5.2% (41) Psychiatric disorders 5.9% (91) 8.0% (63) Renal and urinary disorders 4.6% (72) 6.0% (47) Neoplasms, benign, malignant (incl cysts/polyps) 2.5% (38) 3.4% (27) Reproductive system and breast disorders 2.5% (38) 3.2% (25) Blood and lymphatic system disorders 2.4% (37) 3.0% (24) Ear and labyrinth disorders 2.0% (31) 2.9% (23) Adverse Events of Special Interest Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients who completed W78 visit) All patients on background of max tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy Treatment-emergent local injection site reactions 5.8% (90) 4.3% (34) General allergic reaction events 9.0% (140) 9.0% (71) All cardiovascular events 4.0% (62) 4.4% (35) Neurological events 4.2% (65) 3.9% (31) Neurocognitive disorders 1.2% (18) 0.5% (4) Ophthalmological events 2.5% (38) 1.9% (15) Haemolytic anaemia 0 0 12 Confirmed by adjudication. Adjudicated CV events include all CV AEs positively adjudicated. The adjudication categories are the following: CHD death, non-fatal MI, fatal and non-fatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalisation, congestive heart failure requiring hospitalisation, ischemia driven coronary revascularisation procedure [PCI, CABG]. Company MedDRA Queries (CMQ). Statistical analyses have not been performed. 6

Neurocognitive Adverse Events Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients who completed W78 visit) All patients on background of max tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy Any neurocognitive disorder 1.2% (18) 0.5% (4) Amnesia 0.3% (5) 0% (0) Memory impairment 0.3% (5) 0.1% (1) Confusional state 0.3% (4) 0.1% (1) Confusion postoperative <0.1% (1) 0% (0) Dementia <0.1% (1) 0.1% (1) Disorientation <0.1% (1) 0% (0) Disturbance in attention <0.1% (1) 0.1% (1) Frontotemporal dementia <0.1% (1) 0% (0) Transient global amnesia <0.1% (1) 0% (0) 13 Company MedDRA Queries (CMQ). Statistical analyses have not been performed. Post-hoc Adjudicated Cardiovascular TEAEs Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients in ongoing study) Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients who completed W78 visit) All patients on background of max tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy CV events confirmed by adjudication 1.4% (22) 3.0% (24) CHD death 0.2% (3) 0.8% (6) Non-fatal MI 0.7% (11) 2.2% (17) Fatal + non-fatal ischaemic stroke 0.5% (8) 0.3% (2) Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation 0 0.1% (1) 14 Patients are censored at the end of TEAE period (last injection of study treatment + 70 days). Primary endpoint for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial: CHD death, Non-fatal MI, Fatal and non-fatal ischemic stroke, Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation. Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation is limited to the UA events with definite evidence of progression of the ischemic condition (strict criteria). 7

No. at Risk 15 Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Adjudicated Major CV Event Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients who completed W78 visit) Cumulative probability of event Post-hoc Adjudicated Cardiovascular TEAEs Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients in ongoing study) 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 788 1550 + max-tolerated statin ± other LLT + max-tolerated statin ± other LLT Cox model analysis: HR=0.46 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.82) Nominal p-value = <0.01 12 776 1534 24 731 1446 Mean treatment duration: 65 weeks Primary endpoint for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial: CHD death, Non-fatal MI, Fatal and non-fatal ischemic stroke, Unstable angina requiring hospitalisation. LLT, lipid-lowering therapy 36 703 1393 48 682 1352 60 667 1335 72 321 642 84 Weeks 127 252 Conclusions Largest and longest double-blind study of a PCSK9 inhibitor Current analysis provides ~1900 patient-years of double-blind patient exposure to alirocumab 150 mg Q2W In high CV-risk patients on max-tolerated statin other LLT: Self-administered alirocumab produced significantly greater LDL-C vs. placebo at W24 (LS mean difference 61.9%) 79% of alirocumab pts achieved LDL-C goal of <1.81 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) at W24 Mean achieved LDL-C levels of 1.4 mmol/l (53.1 mg/dl) at W52 with alirocumab TEAEs generally comparable in alirocumab and placebo arms A post-hoc safety analysis showed a lower rate of adjudicated major CV events 16 8

Thank you to all principal investigators and national coordinators! Canada: 14 sites Europe: 154 sites Belgium: 4 sites; Bulgaria: 9 sites; Czech Rep.: 3 sites; Denmark: 5 sites; Finland: 4 sites; France: 12 sites; Germany: 15 sites; Hungary: 10 sites; Italy: 8 sites; Netherlands: 12 sites; Norway: 5 sites; Poland: 9 sites; Portugal: 4 sites; Romania: 4 sites; Russia: 7 sites; Spain: 8 sites; Sweden: 5 sites; Ukraine: 11 sites; UK: 19 sites USA: 115 sites Israel: 4sites Central/South America: 22 sites Argentina: 6 sites Chile: 4 sites Colombia: 5 sites Mexico: 7 sites South Africa: 11 sites 320 sites worldwide 17 9