Trace Elements in Manure

Similar documents
NUTRIENT AND HEAVY METAL CONTENTS OF HOG MANURE - EFFECT ON SOIL QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY

We are committed to becoming a watershed to Agriculture and restoring it to its rightful place in the economy. This is substantiated through our

Bottom Ash Data Week 37

Bottom Ash Data Week 30

Matrix Reference Materials - SCP SCIENCE

Bottom Ash Data Week 38

Bottom Ash Data Week 8

Bottom Ash Data Week 12

Bottom Ash Data Week 49

Bottom Ash Data Week 9

Bottom Ash Data Week 17

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

Bottom Ash Data Week 1

Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

COMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

Bottom Ash Data Week 40

AAFCO Check Sample 2015 Minerals Program. A Targeted and Engineered Concentration Program

COMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

COMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

Micronutrient Management. Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

An examination of the limits for potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in anaerobic digestates

Welcome. Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

Figure 1. Location of 43 benchmark sites across Alberta.

COMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

Chapter 11 Introducing Fertilisers CONTENTS

USER SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUINTOLUBRIC 888 Series DESCRIPTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROPERTIES AND THE POSSIBLE VARIATIONS AND TOLERANCES

Summary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution

Section 2 Feed Management

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

Lesson 3 Understanding Nutrients and Their Importance

Chinese Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate testing. Dick Camp Kronos Micronutrients

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS. tel: fax:

By Andrew & Erin Oxford, Bethel

Feed and Alternative Uses for DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson and Dr. Sally Noll Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Mineral Supplementation of Grazing Beef Cows in Florida

S1AN: Same as test S1A with carryover Nitrogen as Nitrate With Recommendations: $13.20 Without Recommendations: $11.50

COMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

COMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

TOXIC AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS

Water Analysis Interpretation for Livestock

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Inorganic Contaminants

Soils and Soil Fertility Management

Cornell Waste Management Institute

Rachel Madison 1 Lee McDowell George O Connor Nancy Wilkinson Paul Davis Adegbola Adesogan Tara Felix Megan Brennan

of human hair and nails. Part I. Analytical methodology, Sci. Tot. Environ. 2000, 250/1-3,

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Free Choice Sheep Mineral

Product Stewardship Information Sheet CH350LN

Overview. Managing Soil Fertility in Organic Systems. Fertilizer Analyses? Fertilizer Analyses? What Soil Amendments Can Be Used?

Soil research in Europe with special reference to that in Finland A Review

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Test Report No.T JP Date: FEB 22, 2017 Page 1 of 6

Test Report No.T JP Date: FEB 24, 2017 Page 1 of 6

Product Stewardship Information Sheet CH200LN-02

Edward V. Krizhanovsky, Ph.D., Kamila B. Tursunova

Table 1. Plant Nutrients. Nutrients From Air & Water Primary Macronutrients

WHAT ARE FERTILIZERS

FROM WASTE TO SOIL TO PLANT TO FEED THE FATE OF BIOSOLIDS NUTRIENTS AND CONTAMINANTS IN A REAL FARM SITUATION

Fertilization Programming

A & L Canada Laboratories Inc Jetstream Road, London, Ontario, N5V 3P5 Telephone: (519) Fax: (519)

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Inspection and Consumer Services Division FERTIZILERS AND SOIL CONDITIONERS 8 CCR Part 1.

DETERMINATION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN WATERS AND WASTES BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA - MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA Method (Revision 5.

RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO FERTILIZERS

Nutrients. Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen 1/18/2012. Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I I. 17 elements essential for plant growth

3.0 Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

The Impact of Feeding Corn DDGS and Phytase on Manure Phosphorus Management in Pork Production

Plant-Prod is plant productivity. Plant-Prod is the world leader in soluble fertilizers and the partner for growers where high productivity is vital.

Actual Excipient Test Data on Metal Impurities Submitted to IPEC-Americas from Industry

Lamb Feedlot Nutrition

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Inspection and Consumer Services Division. Fertilizers and Soil Conditioners 8 CCR

Revision of ASAE Standard D384.1: a new approach to estimating manure nutrients and characteristics

Test Report No.T TC Date: JUN 29, 2018 Page 1 of 5

Analyte Proficiency From All Labs # Analytes: 26 Sample # Statistical Summary # Labs Reporting: 82 Urea Issue Date : 06/30/2016

FACTORS AFFECTING WATER QUALITY

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Feeding DDGS to Livestock and Poultry. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

A & L Canada Laboratories Inc Jetstream Road, London, Ontario, N5V 3P5 Telephone: (519) Fax: (519)

Wolf Creek Community Alliance 2009 Soil Sampling Report By BJ Schmitt January 26, 2010

Kelp and Dairy Cattle - a Pilot Study

Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

Grinder-Pedersen L, Rasmussen SE, Bugel S, Jorgensen LV, Dragsted LO, Gundersen V, Sandstrom B.

Economic recovery of zinc from Mining Influenced Water (MIW)

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Ranchers Choice AN -18%

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Transcription:

Trace Elements in Manure Purpose: Whenever soil profiles are examined for nutrient trace elements, it has been demonstrated that the metals tend to accumulate in the topsoil. Soil properties affect plant uptake of traceelements and the solubility and losses to surface and groundwater. When biosolids, compost or fertilizers are applied to land, they are affected by guidelines that regulate the amount of trace elements that can be applied to the land base. The purpose of the study was to compare the impact of land application of manure, applied at rates needed to match crop requirements with that of regulated land applied residuals such as sewage biosolids, compost and pulp and paper biosolids. Additionally, this study set out to: provide a baseline data set for concentrations of 21 metals and 2 non-metal elements, survey livestock feeding practices that would help to compare the inter-relationships of metals concentration with feeding and farm practices determine the current state of knowledge with a literature review Methods: Manure from 12 different livestock classifications were sampled and analyzed for nutrients, trace elements and physical parameters. Types of manure sampled included dairy where copper footbaths were used (DC), dairy with no copper footbaths (DN), beef-feedlot (BF), beef-cow/calf (BC), swine-finishers (SF), swine-weaners (SW), swine-sow (SS), poultrylayers (PL), poultry-broilers (PB), poultry-turkeys (PT), sheep, (S) and performance horses (H). Trace elements evaluated included aluminum (Al), antimony (Sb), arsenic (As), barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), calcium (Ca), colbalt (Co), Chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), magnesium (Mg), mercury (Hg), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), selenium (Se), silver (Ag), strontium (Sr), titanium (Ti), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn). Nutrients evaluated included total nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, total phosphorus, potassium, ph, total organic and inorganic carbon and dry matter. In addition to testing nutrients, a phone survey was conducted with farm cooperators to obtain details about feeding, bedding, manure management and sanitary practices that could affect levels of trace elements found in the manure. Results: The premise on starting the study was that trace elements in livestock manures would be relatively low for any elements not fed in the ration. From the manure samples analyzed in the study, the pattern of variability in trace element content of manure was similar to that of nutrient content. The variation with-in site was much smaller than between-sites.

Several of the trace elements (including mercury, beryllium, cadmium, and cobalt) were at or below detection levels in most manure samples tested and other elements (including lead, silver and antimony) were found at trace levels in some of the manures. Copper and zinc concentrations were high in swine and poultry (especially turkey) manures. From the literature review conducted, it was confirmed that the primary sources of trace elements came from feed supply, followed by water supply, contamination from within barns (i.e. chewed wood) and/or fields (i.e. scrap metal) and from trace element loading (i.e. fields that were previously apple orchards sprayed with copper sulfates). Adequate trace elements in feed are essential for healthy livestock production. Excess supplementation results in manures with high levels of these minerals. Most of the toxic trace elements in manures originate in the feed and in particular from mineral phosphorus. Zinc and Copper are included in monograstric (swine and poultry) diets at much higher levels than minimum requirement for normal performance since when fed at higher levels they promote growth. Horse manure samples in the study were particularly high in chromium, nickel, aluminum and iron. The source of nickel and chromium is not clear, but race harness bits used in the industry are often nickel or chrome plated and may have contributed to the concentration of these two metals. With all the livestock manures studied, when manure was applied at typical rates to meet crop requirements over a rotation, none of the trace elements would exceed the levels of those regulated for sewage biosolids. There were a few swine-weaner manure sites where the level did exceed the limits if manure was applied every year to meet continuous grain corn requirements. Although the manure from swine-weaner was measured separately, there are not many facilities where swine-weaner manure would be stored separately. In most cases the storages would also contain swine-sow manure which would dilute the copper and zinc levels. Livestock manure varies in dry matter content. Swine-sow manure will be very dilute, while poultry-broiler manure will be concentrated. This affects application rates so that looking at the results from a dry-matter basis perspective will not give a clear indication of actual risk of different manure types to exceed trace element allowable levels. Manure application rates, whether following BMP s or Nutrient Management Act O.Reg 267/03, are most often determined by the phosphorus content of the manure matched to the rate required to meet crop needs of the rotation. The current high fertilizer value of manure ensures that in general it is treated as a valuable resource and l not as a waste product. This also balances trace element levels and buildup in the soil. The study also determined that manure cannot be used to make class A compost under the current MOE compost guidelines, where limits are based on soil background concentration levels. If the guideline were applied to manure, the feed would have to meet the same metals concentration limits as the end product. Compost standards may need to be reevaluated to ensure that on-farm composting will not require the addition of a large amount of slow biodegradable bulking materials and/or excessive testing to meet standards the end product was not intended to meet.

The graphs below show a comparison of zinc and copper (dry matter basis) concentration in the livestock manure analyzed in the study, and illustrate how they compare to the different standards and guidelines.

Table 1 and Table 2 demonstrate the rate of manure application that would be allowed based on the trace element concentration from the manure samples. The lowest number for each livestock type indicates the limiting trace element. For most livestock types that element is zinc. Table 1 shows the rates on a dry matter basis in metric. In Table 2 the same information is presented in a slightly different way. The average dry matter content for each livestock type has been included to convert the application rates from a dry matter basis (tonnes/ha) to an imperial as-applied basis (tons/ac for solid and gal/ac for liquid manure). For example, in the swine-finisher manure the allowable application per 5 years is 24,113 gallons for zinc. Where manure is applied to a field on a yearly basis the application rate limit for copper would be just over 4,800 gal/ac per year. However, if crop rotation determined that manure would be applied 3 years in 5, then the application rate limit for copper for swine-finisher manure would be just over 8,000 gal/ac.

Table 1. The Total 5-Year Allowable Manure Application (On a dry weight basis) Based On Average Trace Element Concentration In Livestock Manures From The Study And O. Reg 267/03 Limits For Sewage Biosolids Application Element As Cd Co Cr Cu Hg Mo Ni Pb Se Zn Manure Type Ave DM Allowable manure application (tonnes per hectare per 5 years on a dry weight basis) Dairy Liquid 7.8 1,376 374 537 580 59 176 123 222 777 107 44 Solid 20.7 740 228 836 169 69 192 138 82 1,400 105 59 Beef Feedlot 22.2 959 582 1,015 377 86 194 94 136 2,704 83 55 Cow/calf 19.7 810 282 536 166 96 150 61 71 741 167 61 Finisher 7.4 834 920 1,311 2,188 20 523 60 500 2,572 99 25 Swine Weaner 2.7 377 233 1,082 1,551 10 202 41 280 3,131 64 5 Sow 1.8 716 202 625 1,949 22 125 55 429 1,690 55 11 Layers 35.6 1,592 895 1,068 675 71 298 72 197 1,208 78 27 Poultry Broilers 61.4 211 1,228 2,089 917 138 506 118 308 3,098 106 45 Turkeys 39.1 921 216 397 603 17 330 47 251 1,177 58 22 Sheep 33.9 1,787 340 518 622 205 285 173 269 4,847 58 39 Horse 31.0 549 291 481 112 163 270 156 49 524 299 111 Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Mercury (Hg), Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb),Selenium (Se), Zinc (Zn) Table 2. The Total 5-Year Allowable Manure Application (on an as-is basis) Based On Average Trace Element Concentration In Livestock Manures From The Study And O. Reg 267/03 Limits For Sewage Biosolids Application As Cd Co Cr Cu Hg Mo Ni Pb Se Zn Ave DM* Allowable manure application (tons or gallons per acre per 5 years on an as-applied basis) Dairy Liquid 7.8 (L) 1,579,990 429,445 616,610 665,984 67,747 202,092 141,235 254,911 892,189 122,863 50,523 Solid 20.7 (S) 16,039 491 1,799 364 148 413 297 176 3,013 226 127 Beef Feedlot 22.2 (S) 19,409 1,169 2,040 758 173 390 189 273 5,434 167 111 Cow/calf 19.7 (S) 18,474 639 1,214 376 217 340 138 161 1,678 378 138 Swine Finisher 7.4 (L) 1,005,522 1,109,208 1,580,622 2,637,987 24,113 630,561 72,340 602,831 3,100,961 119,360 30,142 Weaner 2.7 (L) 1,245,761 769,926 3,575,366 5,125,132 33,044 667,490 135,481 925,233 10,346,093 211,482 16,522 Sow 1.8 (L) 3,548,931 1,001,235 3,097,880 9,660,429 109,045 619,576 272,613 2,126,385 8,376,667 272,613 54,523 Poultry Layers 35.6 (S) 20,092 1,122 1,338 846 89 373 90 247 1,514 98 34 Broilers 61.4 (S) 1,544 892 1,518 666 100 368 86 224 2,251 77 33 Turkeys 39.1 (S) 10,583 246 453 688 19 376 54 286 1,343 66 25 Sheep 33.9 (S) 23,685 447 682 818 270 375 228 354 6,378 76 51 Horse 31.0 (S) 7,957 419 692 161 235 389 224 71 754 430 160 Arsenic (As) Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Mercury (Hg), Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb),Selenium (Se), Zinc (Zn) *(S) = solid manure where allowable application is in tons/acre (L) = liquid manure where allowable application is reported in gallons/ac

Summary: The study found elevated concentrations of some metals in certain types of manure in comparison to the concentration limits set for non-agricultural source materials. In particular, concentrations were elevated for copper in poultry (especially turkey) manure, and zinc and copper in swine-weaner manure. Zinc and Copper are included in monograstric (swine and poultry) diets at much higher levels than minimum requirement for normal performance since when fed at higher levels they promote growth. Copper and Zinc are elevated in some livestock diets because they are substituted for antibiotics and used as a prophylactic (compound that guards against disease). With all the livestock manures studied, it was determined that when manure was applied at typical rates, to meet crop requirements over a rotation, none of the trace elements exceeded the levels of those regulated for sewage biosolids. The study also determined that manure cannot be used to make class A compost under the current MOE compost guidelines, where limits are based levels that are no higher than those found in soil. Manure composts are not intended to be a soil replacement, however compost standards may need to be re-evaluated. Next Steps: Consultation with the livestock industry will determine if there are alternative feeding strategies that will maintain current production gains but reduce nutrient output (particularly of copper and zinc) in livestock manure. Work is already being done to determine the impact of phytase on copper and zinc availability and to find alternative sources of zinc (including organic) that have higher bioavailablity, could be fed at lower rates, and result in equal or improved production gains. Acknowledgements: Farm Cooperators from 59 farms across Ontario Nutrient Management Directed Research Program (OMAFRA) MOE Standards Development Branch Soil Resource Group - Guelph Project Contacts: Please contact Christine Brown at christine.brown@omafra.gov.on.ca for more information on this study. 6