Expiratory Phase Tracheal Gas Insufflation and Pressure Control in Sheep with Permissive Hypercapnia

Expiratory Phase Tracheal Gas Insufflation and Pressure Control in Sheep with Permissive Hypercapnia HIDEAKI IMANAKA, MAX KIRMSE, HARALD MANG, DEAN HESS, and ROBERT M. KACMAREK Respiratory Care Department Laboratory and the Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) has been shown to be a useful adjunct to mechanical ventilation, decreasing Pa CO2 during permissive hypercapnia. While TGI can be used either with pressure (PCV) or volume-controlled ventilation and continuously or only during the expiratory phase (Ex-TGI), there are no controlled studies evaluating the effects of Ex-TGI with PCV in acute lung injury when the direction of the insufflated flow or the inspiratory:expiratory (I:E) ratio are varied. We evaluated the effect that Ex-TGI with PCV would have on CO 2 removal during both direct and reverse insufflated flow direction with varied I:E ratios when peak airway pressure, total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and tidal volume (VT) were kept constant. In addition we examined the effect that insufflation flow directed toward the mouth (reverse flow) would have on the generation of PEEP compared with flow directed toward the carina (direct flow). After saline lavage, nine sheep were ventilated with PCV to a baseline Pa CO2 of 80 mm Hg. Ex-TGI (10 L/min) was then randomly applied in the reverse and direct direction with I:E set at 1:2 or 2:1. During 1:2 I:E Pa CO2 decreased from 78 4 mm Hg to 60 7 mm Hg (23.5 8.9%) with direct flow and to 64 5 mm Hg (18.5 5.5%) with reverse flow (p 0.05), whereas during 2:1 I:E Pa CO2 decreased from 80 4 mm Hg to 69 8 mm Hg (13.7 9.2%) with direct flow and to 66 4 mm Hg (17.2 4.4%) with reverse flow (p 0.05). Greater PEEP was developed with direct flow (2.8 cm H 2 O I:E 1:2 and 4.0 cm H 2 O I:E 2:1) than with reverse flow ( 0.9 cm H 2 O I:E 1:2 and 0.4 cm H 2 O I:E 2:1), p 0.05. There was no difference in the Pa CO2 change between I:E with reverse flow, but the Pa CO2 decrease was greater (p 0.05) during 1:2 versus 2:1 I:E with direct flow. CO 2 removal during PCV and Ex-TGI is more consistent with reverse flow than with direct flow and PEEP level is less affected by TGI with reverse flow than with direct flow. Imanaka H, Kirmse M, Mang H, Hess D, Kacmarek RM. Expiratory phase tracheal gas insufflation and pressure control in sheep with permissive hypercapnia. AM J RESPIR CRIT CARE MED 1999;159:49 54. Recent efforts to minimize the potential risk of ventilator associated lung injury have resulted in ventilatory strategies that limit tidal volume (VT) and airway pressure and allow permissive hypercapnia (1 4). However, permissive hypercapnia is not without risk. Acute acidosis may extend cardiovascular instability (5), increase intracranial pressure (6) and in general is contraindicated in the presence of severe metabolic acidosis (7). Tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) has been proposed as an adjunct to mechanical ventilation in the presence of permissive hypercapnia (8 10). TGI flushes the anatomic dead space, improving CO 2 removal (11, 12). Systems designed to administer TGI can provide TGI flow continuously (C-TGI, during both inspiration and exhalation) (8, 13) or insufflation only during exhalation (Ex-TGI) (12, 14, 15). With either approach (Received in original form January 22, 1998 and in revised form June 11, 1998) Supported in part by a grant from Sherwood, Davis, and Geck. Dr. Mang has a financial interest in Sherwood, Davis, and Geck. Dr. Kirmse was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KI 582 1-1). Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Robert M. Kacmarek, Ph.D., Respiratory Care Ellison 401, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 159. pp 49 54, 1999 Internet address: www.atsjournals.org the efficiency of CO 2 removal appears to be primarily dependent upon the volume of TGI flow (12) and the size of the anatomic dead space (11, 12). However, the effect of inspiratory/ expiratory (I:E) ratio on TGI efficiency has not been completely addressed (12). C-TGI with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) results in increased VT, peak airway pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (16), because the TGI flow is added to the delivered VT, unless ventilator-delivered VT is decreased by the amount of TGI volume added during inspiration (volume-adjusted TGI) (10, 12, 13). Combining C-TGI with pressure control ventilation (PCV) corrects some of these problems (11, 17, 18) but is limited by the function of the ventilator s exhalation valve (16). Exhalation valves in most ventilators are active only during the expiratory phase. Thus, system pressure and VT increase during C-TGI with PCV once flow delivered by the ventilator decreases to zero. At this time the C-TGI flow adds additional volume increasing airway pressure. Most of the problems associated with C-TGI can be resolved by the use of Ex-TGI (14, 17) because Ex-TGI has little effect on the inspiratory phase. In healthy dogs Ex-TGI with VCV has been shown to be as effective in removing CO 2 (22% reduction) as C-TGI with VCV (36% reduction) and Ex-TGI results in minimal changes in airway pressures and VT

50 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 159 1999 (14). To date no controlled trial has evaluated the effect of Ex- TGI with PCV in acute lung injury. TGI flow can be directed toward the carina (direct flow) or directed toward the mouth (reverse flow) (19). The first evaluation of reverse flow TGI was in healthy dogs using C-TGI and VCV (20). In this study direct flow TGI was more effective in reducing Pa CO2 than reverse flow TGI (20). However, more recently Ravenscraft and coworkers have shown that CO 2 elimination is primarily based on TGI flush volume not on TGI flow direction (12). It has also been demonstrated in dogs (20) and in a lung model (19) that reverse flow Ex-TGI results in less change in PEEP than does direct flow TGI (19). Currently there are no controlled evaluations of the effects of reverse flow TGI in acute lung injury or with Ex-TGI and PCV. In this study we evaluated the effects of Ex-TGI with PCV on gas exchange, system pressure and volume, as well as hemodynamics in a sheep lung lavage, acute lung injury model during permissive hypercapnia, and compared the effects of direct and reverse flow Ex-TGI with normal and inverse I:E ratios. METHODS Lung Injury Model This study was approved by the Subcommittee on Research and Animal Care of the Massachusetts General Hospital. A total of nine Hampshire sheep (27 to 30 kg body weight) were anesthetized with halothane and endotracheally intubated, after which pulmonary (7.5 Fr; Baxter Healthcare Corp., Irvine, CA) and femoral artery catheters were inserted, tracheostomy performed, and an esophageal balloon (14 Fr; Mallinckrodt Laboratories Ltd., Athlone, Ireland) placed. Sheep were maintained anesthetized and paralyzed throughout the study with continuous intravenous administration of butorphanol (2 mg/h), diazepam (10 mg/h), and pancuronium bromide (2 mg/h) (21). Lung injury was produced by bilateral lung lavage with 1 L instillation of isotonic saline warmed to 39 C (21, 22). With the saline in the lung, the animals position was rotated among supine, right, and left lateral positions. The lavage was repeated until the Pa O2 decreased to approximately 70 mm Hg at a fraction of inspired oxygen (FI O2 ) of 0.5 and PEEP of 10 cm H 2 O (21). After lung lavage, the sheep were allowed to stabilize for a period of at least 60 min with VCV, FI O2 0.5, ventilator rate 15 breaths/min, VT 250 ml, inspiratory flow 24 L/min, and PEEP 10 cm H 2 O. Lactated Ringer s solution was administered intravenously at a rate sufficient to maintain cardiac output at baseline (5 10 ml/kg/h). Core temperature was maintained at 39 C by an electric heater and blankets. Before and after the lavage, a static pressure volume curve was established with a 500-ml calibration syringe (23). After establishing a volume history (VCV, VT 400 ml, inspiratory flow 24 L/min, end-inspiratory pause 0.7 s, PEEP 10 cm H 2 O, FI O2 0.5, rate 15 breaths/min), the lungs were inflated stepwise in 50-ml increments to 500 ml with a 3-s pause at each step. The procedure was repeated three times. From each curve the lower inflection point was determined and the results averaged. At the end of the experiment, the lower inflection point was again determined in a similar manner. Figure 1. (Top panel) Illustration of the double-lumen endotracheal tube used to provide reverse flow expiratory phase TGI. The main lumen of this tube has an internal diameter (i.d.) of 7.8 mm while the TGI channel has an i.d. of 3.5 mm. Note the TGI channel is directed upward into the main lumen. (Bottom panel) With direct flow TGI a 16-gauge catheter was inserted into the main lumen of the double-lumen endotracheal tube and positioned 0.5 cm beyond the tip of the endotracheal tube. TGI System Following establishment of lung injury, the tracheostomy tube was replaced with a prototype double-lumen endotracheal tube (Sherwood, St. Louis, MO) with its tip positioned 2.5 cm above the carina. This tube (Figure 1) has a 7.8-mm internal diameter (i.d.) main lumen and a 3.5-mm i.d. second lumen that directs a secondary flow toward the mouth (reverse flow TGI) (19). An 8-Fr catheter (30800; Healthcare Group Inc., Cumberland, RI) was passed alongside the tube and advanced to the bifurcation of the carina with fiberoptic bronchoscopic guidance to measure carinal pressure. Two different flow directions of Ex-TGI were applied: direct flow and reverse flow. In direct flow, a TGI flow of 10 L/min directed toward the carina was provided by a 16-gauge catheter (Intracath; Desert Medical Inc., Sandy, UT) inserted into the main lumen of the endotracheal tube (16). The catheter tip was positioned 0.5 cm beyond the tip of the prototype endotracheal tube (i.e., 2 cm above the bifurcation of the carina). In reverse flow, a TGI flow of 10 L/min was provided via the second lumen of the endotracheal tube and was directed toward the mouth by a nozzle at the tip of the reverse flow tube (19) (Figure 1). Ex-TGI was established with an external three-way solenoid valve (model A3314-S8; Precision Dynamics Inc., New Britain, CT) that was electrically connected to the exhalation valve solenoid of a 7200ae ventilator (Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Carlton, CA) as we reported previously (17, 24). Oxygen concentration of the TGI flow was set identical to the gas delivered by the ventilator using an oxygen blender (Bird/3M, Palm Springs, CA). Experimental Protocol After the stabilization period, the ventilator setting was changed to PCV with permissive hypercapnia. PEEP was set 1 cm H 2 O above the inflection point noted on the static pressure volume curve (23). Respiratory rate was 15 breaths/min with FI O2 0.5 and inspiratory time (TI) 1.32 s or 2.66 s. Each inspiratory time provided an I:E ratio of 1:2 or 2:1. The PCV level was selected to ensure a Pa CO2 near 80 mm Hg without TGI. Then total PEEP was measured using the auto-peep function incorporated into the 7200ae ventilator. Total PEEP was maintained identical throughout the complete study of each animal. Sodium bicarbonate solution (1 meq/ml) was administered to maintain arterial ph over 7.2 when hypercapnia was induced. After the initial control period, two directions of TGI flow (direct and reverse) were randomly evaluated at TI of 1.32 s and 2.66 s. When Ex-TGI was applied to PCV with direct flow, the development of auto-peep increased total PEEP, decreased the driving pressure and, as a result, decreased VT delivered from the ventilator (17). Therefore, the PEEP setting on the ventilator was decreased to maintain total PEEP identical to the baseline value. In addition, PCV level was increased to maintain peak airway opening pressure and VT identical.

Imanaka, Kirmse, Mang, et al.: Lung Lavage Model of Permissive Hypercapnia 51 During reverse flow TGI PEEP changed less than 1 cm H 2 O during both I:E ratios; as a result, total PEEP was not corrected. During the total PEEP measurement (on the 7200 ventilator), the solenoid valve of the TGI system eliminated the TGI flow at end-expiration. Total PEEP was measured by the auto-peep function of the 7200 ventilator, by the establishment of an end-expiratory hold. However, because of the high resistance of the direct flow TGI catheter (16-gauge), additional volume ( 25 ml compressed volume) was delivered into the lungs during the total PEEP measurement. Using total patient/ventilator system compliance, we calculated the pressure generated by the compressed volume added during total PEEP measurement with direct flow TGI and subtracted this pressure from the total PEEP measured. With the reverse flow TGI tube, additional volume was small ( 2 ml) because of the low resistance of the tube and was not compensated. These adjustments ensured that both peak inspiratory pressure and total PEEP remained constant regardless of TGI flow direction or inspiratory time. To confirm a constant level of lung injury throughout the experiment, baseline data were collected before and after each trial, resulting in six baseline measurements. Each experimental setting and baseline period was maintained for at least 25 min with blood gases analyzed every 5 min until the Pa CO2 stabilized. Measurements Measurements of hemodynamics, gas exchange, and pulmonary mechanics were obtained before lavage, at the end of each baseline period, and following each of the four TGI trials. Hemodynamics. Mean arterial and pulmonary artery pressures were monitored (pressure transducers 049924-507A, Argon; Maxxim Medical, Athens, TX) and amplified (8805B; Hewlett-Packard, Waltham, MA) with the zero reference level at midthorax in the supine position. Pressures were displayed on screen and recorded (WINDAQ; Dataq Instruments, Inc., Akron, OH) at 100 Hz/channel. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and central venous pressure (CVP) were measured at end-expiration. Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution (9520A; American Edwards Laboratories, Irvine, CA) as the average of three sequential measurements obtained by injecting 5 ml of 0 C lactated Ringer s solution. Gas exchange. Arterial blood gases were analyzed for ph, Pa CO2, and Pa O2. Expired gas was gathered into a large collection bag (Vacu- Med 25 L balloon; Vacumetrics Inc., Ventura, CA) and mean expired CO 2 concentration was measured with an infrared capnometer (Model 2200; Traverse Medical Monitors, Saline, MI). The capnometer was calibrated with 5% CO 2 in N 2 (BOC Gases, Murray Hill, NJ). Airway pressure and volume. Airway opening pressure, carinal pressure, and esophageal pressure were measured with differential pressure transducers (45-32-871, 100 cm H 2 O; Validyne, Northridge, CA) and amplified (8805C; Hewlett-Packard). The transducers were calibrated simultaneously at 20 cm H 2 O using a water manometer. The proper position of the esophageal balloon in the midesophagus was confirmed by cardiac oscillations observed on the esophageal pressure trace (25). The esophageal balloon was filled with 1 ml air. These data provided peak, mean, and end-expiratory pressures at the airway opening and at the carina and the change in esophageal pressure. Pneumotachometers (3700A; Hans-Rudolph Inc., Kansas City, MO) were placed at both the inspiratory and expiratory limbs of the ventilator as close to the Y-piece as possible. The pressure differential across the pneumotachometers was measured (45-142-871, 2 cm H 2 O; Validyne), digitized, and converted to flow (WINDAQ). Pneumotachographs were calibrated in series with a 0.5 L/s flow delivered by precision flow meter (Brooks Instruments, Hatfield, PA). Tidal volume was integrated from flow and confirmed with a 500-ml syringe. Inspired tidal volume was corrected for the compressible volume of the expiratory circuit (compliance 1.3 ml/cm H 2 O) (11, 20). Expired gas included the volume delivered by the TGI system during expiration and compressible volume of the whole ventilator circuit (compliance 2.7 ml/cm H 2 O). Corrected VT = inspired VT 1.3 ( PIP applied PEEP ) Expired VT = corrected VT + ( TGI flow) TE + 2.7 ( PIP applied PEEP ) Corrected mean expired PCO 2 = ( mean expired PCO 2 ) ( expired VT) ( corrected VT) VD VT = Pa CO2 where PIP is peak airway opening pressure and TE is expiratory time. All measurements were made during the last 5 min of each trial. All signals were digitized at 100 Hz, recorded, and analyzed using WINDAQ. Statistical Analysis Three breaths were analyzed for each experimental setting after stabilization. All values were expressed as mean standard deviation (SD). The data obtained from the six baselines were first compared to detect any variation over time. Because there was no such effect, the six controls were averaged and analyzed as a group. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measurements. Post hoc analysis was done with the Scheffe test (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Significance was set at p 0.05. RESULTS After lung lavage, an inflection point was observed in all sheep, ranging from 17 to 21 cm H 2 O (19.0 1.2 cm H 2 O). The lung lavage decreased compliance from 30.7 5.0 ml/cm H 2 O to 17.0 2.3 ml/cm H 2 O (p 0.01). At the end of the experiment, compliance was the same as postlavage (18.6 2.8 ml/cm H 2 O). Lung lavage decreased the Pa O2 (71 15 mm Hg, FI O2 0.5, PEEP 10 cm H 2 O) from prelavage values (245 155 mm Hg, FI O2 0.5, PEEP 10 cm H 2 O) and increased the dead space to tidal volume ratio to 0.61 0.06 from prelavage values (0.51 0.07). Gas Exchange ( corrected mean expired PCO 2 ) Pa CO2 Table 1 and Figure 2 present the blood gas, dead space to tidal volume ratio (VD VT), and VT data for all trials. Tidal volume was constant during all trials averaging about 180 ml at 1:2 I:E ratios and about 190 ml at 2:1 I:E ratios. Pa CO2 significantly decreased with both TGI directions and both I:E ratios (p 0.05). With an I:E ratio of 1:2, Pa CO2 decreased from 78 4 mm Hg to 60 7 mm Hg (23.5 8.9%, range 14 to 43%) with direct flow and to 64 5 mm Hg (18.5 5.5%, range 9 to 26%) with reverse flow. During extended inspiratory time (2:1 I:E ratio), Pa CO2 decreased from 80 6 mm Hg to 69 8 mm Hg (13.7 9.2%, range 0.4 to 28%) with direct flow and to 66 4 mm Hg (17.2 4.4%, range 11 to 25%) with reverse flow. There were no significant differences in Pa CO2 change observed between direct and reverse flow TGI. The reverse flow showed a similar decrease in Pa CO2 regardless of inspiratory time, while the direct flow showed a larger decrease in Pa CO2 with normal inspiratory time than with extended inspiratory time (23.5 8.9% versus 13.7 9.2%, p 0.05). Similar changes were observed for PE CO2 and VD VT (Table 1). No significant change was observed in the Pa O2 ; however, in both 1:2 and 2:1 I:E ratios the Pa O2 tended to increase with the reverse flow TGI. System Pressures Table 2 lists airway pressures at baseline and during all trials. Peak airway pressure and total PEEP remained constant throughout all trials. However, the amount of PEEP as a result of the TGI flow varied based on direction of flow. With the direct flow, 2.8 1.2 cm H 2 O PEEP was established with the 1:2 I:E ratio and 4.0 1.4 cm H 2 O with the 2:1 I:E ratio. This differed significantly (p 0.05) from the PEEP established during reverse flow ( 0.9 cm H 2 O I:E 1:2; 0.4 cm H 2 O I:E 2:1). Measurement of PEEP at the carina tended to be higher than at the airway opening with the direct flow. No differences in mean airway opening or carinal pressure were observed regardless of trial except with direct flow and a 1:2 I:E ratio. Here the carinal pressure tended to be greater than air-

52 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 159 1999 TABLE 1 BLOOD GASES, ph, AND VT DURING DIRECT AND REVERSE FLOW EXPIRATORY PHASE TGI I:E 1:2 I:E 2:1 Variable Baseline Direct* Reverse Baseline Direct* Reverse ph 7.22 0.02 7.32 0.02 7.30 0.03 7.21 0.03 7.26 0.05 7.29 0.04 PCO 2, mm Hg 78 4 60 7 64 5 80 4 69 8 66 4 % change 23.5 8.9 18.5 5.5 13.7 9.2 17.2 4.4 PO 2, mm Hg 125 39 129 39 145 60 109 27 108 51 133 49 PE, mm Hg CO 2 26 3 11 1 11 1 27 4 15 2 16 2 VD/VT 0.61 0.06 0.35 0.10 0.41 0.10 0.61 0.06 0.48 0.11 0.46 0.08 VT, ml 180 18 183 20 189 20 193 25 193 30 200 35 * Expiratory phase TGI with direct flow catheter. Expiratory phase TGI with reverse flow tube. p 0.05 versus baseline. p 0.05 versus reverse flow. way opening pressure. No differences in esophageal pressure change were observed regardless of TGI direction or I:E ratio. Hemodynamics Table 3 lists hemodynamic measurements at baseline and during all trials. No differences from baseline were observed regardless of TGI direction or I:E ratios. DISCUSSION Figure 2. Pa CO2 changes in each animal studied with both direct flow (Direct) and reverse flow (Reverse) expiratory phase TGI. (Top panel ) Normal (1:2) I:E ratio. (Bottom panel) Inverse (2:1) I:E ratio. *p 0.05 versus baseline. The most important findings of this study are: (1) The efficiency of direct flow Ex-TGI decreased at short expiratory time. (2) The efficiency of reverse flow Ex-TGI was not affected by alterations in expiratory time. (3) Direct flow TGI increased total PEEP, which was underestimated by carinal pressure monitoring, whereas with reverse flow TGI only minor changes in total PEEP were observed. (4) The combination of Ex-TGI and PCV minimized changes in PIP and VT regardless of I:E or direction of insufflated flow. Pa CO2, I:E, and TGI Direction Regardless of TGI direction or I:E ratio, the Pa CO2 decrease was similar. However, direct flow TGI demonstrated a trend toward more effective CO 2 elimination with short inspiratory time, whereas reverse flow TGI demonstrated identical CO 2 elimination with both normal and long inspiratory times. In fact, there was a difference in the efficacy of CO 2 elimination between I:E ratios with direct flow TGI. Our data differ from that reported by Nahum and coworkers (20) in hypoventilated healthy dogs. They reported better CO 2 removal with a direct flow catheter (Pa CO2 changes from 56.0 to 39.5 mm Hg, 29.5% decrease) than with a reverse flow catheter (Pa CO2 decrease from 56.0 to 44.1 mm Hg, 21.3% decrease) at 10 L/min Ex- TGI flow. Their protocol differed from ours on a number of points. They studied healthy dogs, using VCV with short inspiratory times and adjusted their VT and end-expiratory lung volume by respiratory inductive plethysmography. As a result airway pressure may have varied between methods because of the difference in PEEP established by TGI approach. Our data are somewhat in agreement with that of Ravenscraft and coworkers (12) who showed in healthy dogs that CO 2 elimination was dependent on TGI flush volume not on TGI direction. Ravenscraft and coworkers (12) used VCV and Ex-TGI and also noted no difference in the efficacy of CO 2 removed as inspiratory time was adjusted when flush volume was constant. With both direct and reverse flow TGI flush volume was cut in half (447 ml versus 223 ml/breath) as expiratory time decreased. However, the efficiency of CO 2 removal was affected to a greater extent with direct than with reverse flow TGI. It can be speculated that the impaired exhalation during direct TGI, as reflected by an increased auto-peep, may explain this observed difference in efficacy. Because the auto-peep measurement by an end-expiratory hold only reflects a static-average value, the regional distribution of PEEP may have been very different between TGI approaches. This may have resulted in greater differences in V / Q with direct versus reverse TGI. This is illustrated by the fact that VD/VT increased to a greater extent with direct TGI (0.35 to 0.48, p 0.05) than reverse TGI (0.41 to 0.46, p NS), and although not significant the Pa O2 tended to improve during reverse flow TGI. However, this would also mean that these results are very dependent on the inhomogeneity of the lung (e.g., different lung models) and the distribution of alveolar time constants within the lung. In addition, as shown by Takahashi and coworkers (26) with reverse TGI, the jet drag effect establishes a nega-

Imanaka, Kirmse, Mang, et al.: Lung Lavage Model of Permissive Hypercapnia 53 TABLE 2 SYSTEM PRESSURES DURING DIRECT AND REVERSE FLOW EXPIRATORY PHASE TGI I:E 1:2 I:E 2:1 Variable Baseline Direct* Reverse Baseline Direct* Reverse PIP, cm H 2 O 29.8 1.8 30.0 1.7 29.9 1.6 29.9 1.4 29.9 1.4 29.9 1.2 PEEPao, cm H 2 O 20.0 1.4 17.2 1.1 21.0 1.3 20.0 1.3 16.2 1.1 20.8 1.1 PEEPcar, cm H 2 O 20.2 1.6 18.8 0.6 20.0 1.7 20.4 1.5 18.8 1.2 20.0 1.1 mpao, cm H 2 O 23.4 1.4 21.6 1.1 24.1 1.3 26.5 1.3 25.3 1.3 26.8 1.1 mpcar, cm H 2 O 23.6 1.6 23.1 1.1 23.6 1.7 26.7 1.5 26.4 1.4 26.7 1.2 tpeep, cm H 2 O 20.0 1.4 20.0 1.6 20.1 1.5 20.4 1.5 20.1 1.7 20.4 1.2 dpes, cm H 2 O 2.1 0.6 2.5 0.5 2.0 0.6 2.4 0.3 2.3 0.6 2.4 0.3 Definition of abbreviations: dpes change in esophageal pressure; mpao, mpcar mean pressure at airway opening and carina; PEEPao, PEEPcar end-expiratory pressure at airway opening and carina; PIP peak airway opening pressure; tpeep total PEEP at airway opening ( external PEEP TGI established PEEP). * Expiratory phase TGI with direct flow catheter. Expiratory phase TGI with reverse flow tube. p 0.05 versus baseline. p 0.05 versus reverse flow. tive pressure at the carina, which may have enhanced molecular activity increasing TGI efficiency. Development of PEEP The most important difference between the effects of TGI direction is the development of PEEP. With direct flow TGI at 10 L/min in our model 2.8 to 3.8 cm H 2 O PEEP was established by the TGI flow, whereas with reverse flow TGI PEEP was decreased by 0.4 to 0.9 cm H 2 O. These observations agree with our previous lung model data (16, 19, 24) and data in healthy dogs (12, 20). Direct flow TGI establishes an endexpiratory threshold increasing PEEP and lung volume, whereas reverse flow TGI, as a result of the jet drag effect, decreases PEEP and lung volume. The small effect of reverse flow TGI on PEEP observed in our study may be a direct result of TGI catheter design. The reverse flow catheter we used had a 3.5-mm i.d. with a 2.6-mm injection orifice, while the direct flow catheter had an internal lumen of 0.9 mm the total length of the catheter (16-gauge). As a result of the differences in flow resistance between systems the gas velocity from the reverse flow catheter may have been too low to establish a large jet drag effect, thus minimal change in PEEP. Alternate design catheters may cause a greater decrease in PEEP during reverse flow TGI. Hemodynamic Effects No differences in hemodynamic parameters were observed across baseline and TGI method regardless of I:E ratio. The consistency of hemodynamic data is a result of maintaining inspiratory time, total PEEP, VT, and mean carinal pressure essentially unchanged during all trials at each I:E ratio. Limitations. This study was performed in a sheep lung lavage model of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which may not reflect the same pathophysiology observed in human ARDS or in other ARDS models (oleic acid, sepsis, etc.) and as a result should only cautiously be applied to these settings without further study. In addition, because our Ex- TGI system was designed in our laboratory, its functional characteristics may differ from those of other groups (12, 15) and the eventual systems developed by industry. Expiratory resistance between the two TGI approaches was different (reverse 3.92 cm H 2 O/L/s; direct 4.98 cm H 2 O/L/s at 0.5 L/s expiratory flow without TGI flow and 3.83 cm H 2 O/ L/s [reverse] and 11.42 cm H 2 O/L/s [direct] at 0.5 L/s expiratory flow during 10 L/min TGI flow). With the reverse flow design a prototype double-lumen endotracheal tube was used. The internal diameter of the main lumen was unaltered during reverse flow TGI. Direct flow TGI was established by inserting a 16-gauge catheter into the main lumen of the reverse flow TGI tube; as a result expiratory resistance was higher, potentially affecting CO 2 washout. The tip of the reverse flow tube and the direct flow tube were different distances from the carina (2.5 versus 2.0 cm, respectively) and the velocity of gas flow was much greater with the direct flow method than the reverse flow method. These two differences may have enhanced CO 2 removed with the direct flow method. TABLE 3 HEMODYNAMIC VARIABLES DURING DIRECT AND REVERSE FLOW EXPIRATORY PHASE TGI I:E 1:2 I:E 2:1 Variable Baseline Direct* Reverse Baseline Direct* Reverse MBP, mm Hg 95 7 99 9 104 13 98 8 98 11 99 10 MPAP, mm Hg 32 3 31 3 31 3 34 3 33 3 33 4 CVP, mm Hg 15 2 15 2 15 2 15 2 15 2 15 2 PCWP, mm Hg 16 2 15 2 16 2 16 2 16 1 16 2 CO, L/min 5.8 1.5 5.2 1.3 5.6 1.2 5.7 1.5 5.3 1.2 5.3 1.5 SVR, dyn s cm 5 1,152 176 1,352 258 1,305 201 1,217 236 1,317 321 1,304 256 PVR, dyn s cm 5 244 65 238 63 218 56 269 88 276 90 273 74 Definition of abbreviations: CO cardiac output; CVP central venous pressure; MBP mean arterial blood pressure; MPAP mean pulmonary artery blood pressure; PVR pulmonary vascular resistance; SVR systemic vascular resistance. * Expiratory phase TGI with direct flow catheter. Expiratory phase TGI with reverse flow tube.

54 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 159 1999 In conclusion, the use of Ex-TGI with PCV is an efficient method of enhancing CO 2 elimination in a sheep lung lavage model of ARDS. Neither the direction of TGI flow nor the I:E ratio markedly affects CO 2 elimination. Direct flow TGI causes an increase in total PEEP whereas reverse flow TGI decreases total PEEP. References 1. Hickling, K. G., S. J. Henderson, and R. Jackson. 1990. Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 16:372 377. 2. Hickling, K. G., J. Walsh, S. Henderson, and R. Jackson. 1994. Low mortality rate in adult respiratory distress syndrome using low-volume, pressure-limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia: a prospective study. Crit. Care Med. 22:1568 1578. 3. Slutsky, A. S. 1993. Mechanical ventilation. ACCP Consensus Conference. Chest 104:1833 1859. 4. Amato, M. B. P., C. S. V. Barbas, D. M. Medeiros, G. P. P. Schettino, G. L. Filho, R. A. Kairalla, D. Deheinzelin, C. Morais, E. O. Fernandes, T. Y. Takagaki, and C. R. R. de Carvalho. 1995. Beneficial effects of the open lung approach with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152:1835 1846. 5. Wolley, K., T. Lewis, and L. Wood. 1990. Acute respiratory acidosis decreases left ventricular contractability but increases output in dogs. Circ. Res. 100:102 106. 6. Hickling, K. G., and C. Joyce. 1995. Permissive hypercapnia in ARDS and its effect on tissue oxygenation. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 39:201 208. 7. Tuxen, D. V. 1994. Permissive hypercapnic ventilation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 150:870 874. 8. Ravenscraft, S. A., W. C. Burke, A. Nahum, A. B. Adams, G. Nakos, T. W. Marcy, and J. J. Marini. 1993. Tracheal gas insufflation augments CO 2 clearance during mechanical ventilation. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 148:345 351. 9. Belghith, M., L. Fierobe, F. Brunet, M. Monchi, and J. P. Mira. 1995. Is tracheal gas insufflation an alternative to extrapulmonary gas exchangers in severe ARDS? Chest 107:1416 1419. 10. Kuo, P. H., H. D. Wu, C. J. Yu, S. C. Yang, and Y. L. Lai. 1996. Efficacy of tracheal gas insufflation in acute respiratory distress syndrome with permissive hypercapnia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 154:612 616. 11. Nahum, A., W. C. Burke, S. A. Ravenscraft, T. W. Marcy, A. B. Adams, P. S. Crooke, and J. J. Marini. 1992. Lung mechanics and gas exchange during pressure-control ventilation in dogs: augmentation of CO 2 elimination by an intratracheal catheter. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 146: 965 973. 12. Ravenscraft, S. A., R. S. Shapiro, A. Nahum, W. C. Burke, A. B. Adams, G. Nakos, and J. J. Marini. 1996. Tracheal gas insufflation: catheter effectiveness determined by expiratory flush volume. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 153:1817 1824. 13. Nahum, A., A. Chandra, J. Niknam, S. A. Ravenscraft, A. B. Adams, and J. J. Marini. 1995. Effect of tracheal gas insufflation on gas exchange in canine oleic acid induced lung injury. Crit. Care Med. 23: 348 356. 14. Burke, W. C., A. Nahum, S. A. Ravenscraft, G. Nakos, A. B. Adams, T. W. Marcy, and J. J. Marini. 1993. Modes of tracheal gas insufflation: comparison of continuous and phase-specific gas injection in normal dogs. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 148:562 568. 15. Nahum, A., R. S. Shapiro, S. A. Ravenscraft, A. B. Adams, and J. J. Marini. 1995. Efficacy of expiratory tracheal gas insufflation in a canine model of lung injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152:489 495. 16. Imanaka, H., R. M. Kacmarek, R. Ritz, and D. Hess. 1996. Tracheal gas insufflation pressure control versus volume control ventilation: a lung model study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 153:1019 1024. 17. Imanaka, H., V. Riggi, D. Hess, R. Ritz, and R. M. Kacmarek. 1995. Continuous vs. expiratory phase tracheal gas insufflation during pressure control ventilation: a lung model study (abstract). Respir. Care 40:1196. 18. Nahum, A., S. A. Ravenscraft, G. Nakos, W. C. Burke, A. B. Adams, T. W. Marcy, and J. J. Marini. 1992. Tracheal gas insufflation during pressure-control ventilation: effect of catheter position, diameter, and flow rate. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 146:1411 1418. 19. Kirmse, M., H. Imanaka, H. Mang, D. Hess, and R. M. Kacmarek. 1995. Tracheal gas insufflation with a new double lumen endotracheal tube: a comparison of continuous vs. expiratory TGI during pressure control ventilation (abstract). Respir. Care 40:1196. 20. Nahum, A., S. A. Ravenscraft, G. Nakos, A. B. Adams, W. C. Burke, and J. J Marini. 1993. Effect of catheter flow direction on CO 2 removal during tracheal gas insufflation in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 75: 1238 1246. 21. Mang, H., R. M. Kacmarek, R. Ritz, R. S. Wilson, and W. R. Kimball. 1995. Cardiorespiratory effects of volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation at various I/E ratios in an acute lung injury model. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 151:731 736. 22. Lachmann, B., B. Robertson, and J. Vogel. 1980. In vivo lung lavage as an experimental model of the respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Anaesthiol. Scand. 24:236 236. 23. Tobin, M. J., F. Laghi, and F. M. Walsh. 1994. Monitoring of lung mechanics and work of breathing. In M. J. Tobin, editor. Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation. McGraw-Hill, New York. 967 1003. 24. Riggi, V., H. Imanaka, R. Ritz, D. Hess, and R. M. Kacmarek. 1995. Expiratory tracheal gas insufflation (E-TGI): a prototype device for use with the PB 7200ae ventilator (abstract). Respir. Care 40:1196. 25. Trop, D., R. Peeters, and K. P. van de Woestijne. 1970. Localization of recording site in the esophagus by means of cardiac artifacts. J. Appl. Physiol. 29:283 287. 26. Takahashi, T., A. Adams, P. Bliss, R. Logid, and J. Marini. 1997. Negative expiratory pressure (NEAP) and tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) in combination augments CO 2 elimination more than TGI alone (abstract). Respir. Care 42:1063.