Scientific Facts on. Mercury

Similar documents
Dental amalgams & alternative materials

Minamata Convention. Initial Assesment in Turkey

Scientific Facts on. PCBs. Polychlorinated biphenyls

METHYLMERCURY IN SPORT FISH:

MINAMATA CONVENTION ON MERCURY: RATIFICATION CONSIDERATIONS

Japan's Contribution to the Minamata Convention. To Prevent Global Mercury Pollution

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans IARC Monograph Evaluations

Scientific Facts on. Water Disinfectants. & disinfectant by-products

ACTIVITIES DEVELOPED AND PROMOTED BY WHO

The Minamata Convention on Mercury --Its Significance and Challenges--

- Overview - Mercury Releases from Dental

30 September Please find below initial input for the study relevant to mercury in dental amalgams and batteries.

Endocrine Disruptors

Implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury in the Interim Period until Entry into Force

Scientific Facts on. Alcohol

Scientific Facts on. Psychoactive Drugs. Tobacco, Alcohol, and Illicit Substances

United Nations Environment Programme

International SAICM Implementation Project (ISIP)

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

Lead Paint Alliance Toolkit for Establishing Laws to Control the Use of Lead in Paint. Patrick Huber US Environmental Protection Agency

The Facts About Phosphorus

> Low-frequency magnetic fields and cancer

Media centre. Dioxins and their effects on human health. Key Facts. 1 of 7 1/7/11 1:31 PM

Overview of the mercury issues in Japan and the mercury treaty

Drug-resistant Tuberculosis

DENTAL AMALGAM IN THE EU

Dental bonds to small-scale gold mining

4.1 Cycling of Matter Date: Cycling of Organic and Inorganic Matter. Build your Own Notes:

Heavy Metals. General concepts (EHL0036)

Mercury. Health Effects and Reducing Exposure. UMBSON Environmental Health Education Center. Mercury

THE MINAMATA CONVENTION ON MERCURY AND INDIA: A LEGAL REVIEW

The carcinogenicity of benzene. The IARC Monograph Vol 120. Kurt Straif, MD MPH PhD. PSA, Stavanger, 25 October 2018

Public Health Report: Draft version. Exposure to Mercury in West Virginia

Mercury and madhatters: Implications of dose response

EXCERPT FROM MERCURY STUDY REPORT TO CONGRESS VOLUME I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Barlows Primary School Science Curriculum Content Key Stage 1 and

2014 National Curriculum Science Band 1

GROW GREEN MICROBE PLUS PHOSCAL PHOSPHOROUS ACID LIQUID FERTILIZER Page 1 of Total 5 Date of Issue: 23 July, PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION

WWF's RESPONSE TO THE COMMUNITY STRATEGY FOR ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS

Governing Body 322nd Session, Geneva, 30 October 13 November 2014

ECO TRANSFORM AMALGAM DISPOSAL. Complete recycling system Environmentally friendly In conformity with the law

Cycling of Organic and Inorganic Matter

Comments DRAFT Preamble to the IARC Monograph. Health and Safety Department International Union, UAW 8000 East Jefferson Avenue Detroit, MI 48214

Prepared using Wordle.net for fiendishlyclever.com by R Butler

AN INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS RELATED TO LEVELS OF MERCURY IN HUMAN HAIR

EU Safety and Risk Phrases:

Safety Data Sheet. According to OSHA (HCS)

Questions and Answers on Dioxins and PCBs

Oregon Department of Human Services. 800 NE Oregon Street #604 (971) (971) TTY-Nonvoice TECHNICAL BULLETIN

Information for Parents/Carers SCIENCE TARGETS - A YEAR 1 SCIENTIST

Science curriculum: Reception. Working Scientifically - Skills. Plants and Animals

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans PREAMBLE

& UV radiation. However, there is evidence that UV radiation can cause damage to health.

Fillings: The Choices You Have

In USA, NASA have chosen to use it for astronauts food in space, and even plan to grow and harvest it in space stations in the near future.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS: How does chromium affect humans and how worried should we be about it?

COMMUNITY WATER FLUORIDATION: MYTHS AND FACTS

Science skills progression KS2

R & S Phrases. Introduction.

University of Malta Department of Chemistry GUIDE TO RISK ASSESSMENT

Power lines, Wiring & Appliances

Mercury Advisories and Fish Consumption. Patricia Javier, Hobab Lin, Rachel Smith Thursday, April 27, 2006

Zinc...A Sustainable Material

Assessment of Heavy Metals in Trona from Yobe State, Nigeria

Section 1: SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION AND SUPPLIER. A liquid selenium product for providing selenium supplementation to sheep and cattle

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Natural Guard Neem RTU. Effective Date: 23-Mar PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Research suggests nanoparticles could be contaminating seafood supply

1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/PREPARATION AND OF THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING

Promoting the phase down Of dental amalgam in developing countries

SAFETY DATA SHEET According to regulation (EU) No. 453/2010 DATE

Scientific Facts on. Fluoride. 1.1 Which fluorides are most relevant? What are fluorides used for in industry?...3

Evaluation of Ramazzini Institute Aspartame Studies and EFSA s Assessment

New Materials for Removal of Trace Impurities from Environmental Waters

SRS Achievement Statements. Science

RECOMMENDATION ADOPTED BY THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL AT ITS FIRST MEETING

Risk and safety Phrases

Early Years Foundation Stage

SAFETY DATA SHEET in accordance with Community Regulation 2006/1907 EC REACH Reviewed on 04/07/2013 Mercury - Quecksilber

MVR Forum 18 September 2013

dental fillings facts About the brochure:

Mount Sinai Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit WTC Dioxins Fact Sheet

SDS Safety Data Sheets

Hop Oil Emulsion Safety Data Sheet

FOOD AND DRUGS AUTHORITY (FDA) GHANA

Safety Data Sheet Product No Dodecenyl Succinic Anhydride (DDSA) Issue Date ( ) Review Date ( )

Contribution of Drinking Water to Dietary Requirements of Essential Metals

causing mercury toxicity. It prevents it. Title of Conference

Sudbury Human Health Risk Assessment Briefing

Management of Dental Waste by Practitioners in Nairobi, Kenya.

Compliance with the Dental Rule in Virginia

Draft of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition

SAFETY DATA SHEET. SECTION 1: Identification of the substance / mixture and of the company / undertaking.

Nutrition Labeling Standard Setting & Publicity

Appendix B Toxicity of Mercury

Safety labelling required by law

REPORT ON LAWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DENTAL MERCURY MANAGEMENT IN THE EU

Mercury Dental Amalgam Collection and Recovery U.S. Federal and State Models

Transcription:

page 1/6 Scientific Facts on Mercury Source document: UNEP (2002) Summary & Details: GreenFacts Context - Mercury is a heavy metal of which some forms are known to be highly toxic. Though mercury occurs naturally in the environment it is now mainly released by human activities. Are these releases being controlled? Are humans and the environment at risk? As of November 2017, this 2002 report remains the reference report. An update of the UNCC Global Mercury Assessment will be published 2018 and provide a scientific reassessment of mercury emissions and releases, and its transport of fate in the global environment. Preliminary documents for public consultation are available on http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/21553?show=ful [see http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20. 500.11822/21553?show=full] 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. What is mercury?...2 What are the impacts of mercury on human health?...2 What are the impacts of mercury on the environment?...2 Where is mercury found?...3 Where do the world's supplies of mercury come from?...3 What can be done to reduce mercury releases?...3 What further research and information is needed?...4 Conclusions...4 This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading scientific consensus report produced in 2002 by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): "Executive Summary of the Global Mercury Assessment" The full Digest is available at: https://www.greenfacts.org/en/mercury/ This PDF Document is the Level 1 of a GreenFacts Digest. GreenFacts Digests are published in several languages as questions and answers, in a copyrighted user-friendly Three-Level Structure of increasing detail: Each question is answered in Level 1 with a short summary. These answers are developed in more detail in Level 2. Level 3 consists of the Source document, the internationally recognised scientific consensus report which is faithfully summarised in Level 2 and further in Level 1. All GreenFacts Digests are available at: http://www.greenfacts.org/

page 2/6 1. What is mercury? 1.1 Mercury is a heavy metal, sometimes known as quicksilver, that occurs naturally in the environment in different chemical forms. The pure form, elemental mercury, is liquid at room temperature and slowly forms a vapour in the air. Forms more commonly found in nature are inorganic mercury and organic mercury. 1.2 Natural events (e.g. volcanic activity, weathering of rocks) and human activities (e.g. mining, fuel use, products and processes) can cause mercury releases into the environment. Once released, it can move easily between air, water and land: natural processes can even change mercury from one form to another. 1.3 Mercury can have adverse effects on living organisms and the environment, though these depend on its form as well as dose, etc. 2. What are the impacts of mercury on human health? 2.1 Mercury and its compounds are highly toxic substances for humans. Methylmercury and elemental mercury are of the highest concern. They are poisonous to the nervous system. There is some evidence [see Annex 1, p. 5] at present that methylmercury can cause cancer in humans, but it is far from conclusive. However, there is no evidence at present that elemental mercury causes cancer in humans. Moreover, exposure to methylmercury during pregnancy may affect the unborn baby. 2.2 Humans are mainly exposed to methylmercury through their diet (particularly fish), and to elemental mercury vapours from tooth fillings and at certain workplaces. 2.3 Governmental bodies have set daily mercury intake levels that are considered safe, but some people take in more than these levels. 2.4 Risks vary from one place to another. The risk from diet mainly depends on how much contaminated fish is eaten: moderate consumption of fish with low levels of mercury is not a cause for concern. 3. What are the impacts of mercury on the environment? 3.1 Mercury can be particularly harmful for the environment because it can accumulate in organisms. The levels of methylmercury increase along the food chain and with age. 3.2 Mercury may harm bird reproduction and behaviour. Some seals and whales in the Arctic and some predatory marine mammals in warm waters may be at risk. Methylmercury can accumulate along the food chain Aurileide Alves 3.3 Some ecosystems, such as forest soils, may be affected by mercury.

page 3/6 4. Where is mercury found? 4.1 Mercury is released into the environment through both natural processes (e.g. volcanic activity, weathering of rocks) and human activities (e.g. mining, fuel use, products and processes). Once released, mercury enters air, water and soil, and moves from one to another until it comes to rest in sediments or landfills. 4.2 Mercury deposited from the atmosphere at any particular place comes from both local and global sources. 4.3 Human activity is now the main source of mercury being released into the environment. Much is released unintentionally from processes where mercury is an unwanted impurity. Emissions into the air, mainly from fossil fuel power plants and waste incinerators, are expected to increase unless other energy sources are used or emissions better controlled. However, mercury mining is decreasing and therefore releases from mining and mercury use may be in decline. 4.4 Weathering and evaporation from mercury-rich rocks and soils lead to natural mercury release, as do forest fires and volcanic activity. Although natural emissions are difficult to determine, current estimates suggest that less than 50% of total mercury releases come from natural sources. 5. Where do the world's supplies of mercury come from? 5.1 Mercury placed on the world market comes mainly from cinnabar mines in Spain, China, Kyrgyzstan and Algeria. It can also be recycled from industrial processes. 5.2 Large amounts of recycled mercury will be available over the next decade and beyond and steps are being taken to manage the way it is used. Increased recycling will reduce the movement of new mercury onto the market and into the environment. See also our summary on Dental amalgam [see https://copublications.greenfacts.org/ en/dental-amalgam/index. htm] 5.3 Because of its unique properties, mercury has been used for extracting gold and silver from ores, in chlor-alkali chemical manufacture, in thermometers and manometers, in lights and switches, and in dental amalgam fillings, among others. However, use of mercury and mercury compounds has been reduced for health and environmental reasons. 6. What can be done to reduce mercury releases? 6.1 Mercury releases from current human activity may be limited by either preventive measures or control measures. Preventive measures include reducing the use of mercury-containing products and raw materials, and replacing products and processes that contain or use mercury with ones that do not. Control measures include end-of-pipe techniques and effective waste management. 6.2 A suitable approach for reducing mercury emissions should involve both preventive and control measures.

page 4/6 6.3 There have been many national initiatives to manage the use and release of mercury. These include the setting of mercury emission limits, environmental standards and restrictions on use. International initiatives include legally binding agreements, non-binding initiatives and voluntary private-sector initiatives. 7. What further research and information is needed? 7.1 Most countries need more information in order to manage mercury effectively. Some lack basic information about their own uses and releases of mercury, as well as levels in their local environment, while others want more advanced data in order to assess and manage the risks better. 7.2 Mercury is one of the best-studied environmental toxicants, but there are still some gaps in understanding a number of global issues. However, the information available is sufficient to address, without delay, the global adverse effects of mercury. 8. Conclusions There should be international action to reduce the risks to human health and the environment arising from mercury release into the environment. While more data will help, the adverse impacts of mercury need to be addressed at the global, regional, national and local levels. Various options for doing this have been identified, and areas for immediate action have been proposed.

page 5/6 Annex Annex 1: Standard IARC degrees of evidence of carcinogenicity in humans in experimental animals which are the basis for the Standard IARC Classification Carcinogenicity in humans Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity: The Working Group considers that a causal relationship has been established between exposure to the agent, mixture or exposure circumstance and human cancer. That is, a positive relationship has been observed between the exposure and cancer in studies in which chance, bias and confounding could be ruled out with reasonable confidence. Limited evidence of carcinogenicity: A positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent, mixture or exposure circumstance and cancer for which a causal interpretation is considered by the Working Group to be credible, but chance, bias or confounding could not be ruled out with reasonable confidence. Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity: The available studies are of insufficient quality, consistency or statistical power to permit a conclusion regarding the presence or absence of a causal association between exposure and cancer, or no data on cancer in humans are available. Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity: There are several adequate studies covering the full range of levels of exposure that human beings are known to encounter, which are mutually consistent in not showing a positive association between exposure to the agent, mixture or exposure circumstance and any studied cancer at any observed level of exposure. A conclusion of 'evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity' is inevitably limited to the cancer sites, conditions and levels of exposure and length of observation covered by the available studies. In addition, the possibility of a very small risk at the levels of exposure studied can never be excluded. In some instances, the above categories may be used to classify the degree of evidence related to carcinogenicity in specific organs or tissues. Carcinogenicity in experimental animals Sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity:

page 6/6 The Working Group considers that a causal relationship has been established between the agent or mixture and an increased incidence of malignant neoplasms or of an appropriate combination of benign and malignant neoplasms in (a) two or more species of animals or (b) in two or more independent studies in one species carried out at different times or in different laboratories or under different protocols. Exceptionally, a single study in one species might be considered to provide sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity when malignant neoplasms occur to an unusual degree with regard to incidence, site, type of tumour or age at onset. Limited evidence of carcinogenicity: The data suggest a carcinogenic effect but are limited for making a definitive evaluation because, e.g. (a) the evidence of carcinogenicity is restricted to a single experiment; or (b) there are unresolved questions regarding the adequacy of the design, conduct or interpretation of the study; or (c) the agent or mixture increases the incidence only of benign neoplasms or lesions of uncertain neoplastic potential, or of certain neoplasms which may occur spontaneously in high incidences in certain strains. Inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity: The studies cannot be interpreted as showing either the presence or absence of a carcinogenic effect because of major qualitative or quantitative limitations, or no data on cancer in experimental animals are available. Evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity: Adequate studies involving at least two species are available which show that, within the limits of the tests used, the agent or mixture is not carcinogenic. A conclusion of evidence suggesting lack of carcinogenicity is inevitably limited to the species, tumour sites and levels of exposure studied. Source & IARC Chapter 12 (evaluation) of the Preamble to the IARC Monographs [see http://monographs.iarc.fr/eng/preamble/ eval.php]