Bisphosphonate-Associated Bilateral Atraumatic Ulna Fractures

Similar documents
One Antiresorptive Too Many A Case Report and Clinical Opinion

Using GE Lunar DXA to Quantify, Visualize, and Trend Incipient Atypical Femoral Fractures

Atypical Femoral Fracture: 2015 Position Statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Case Report Combined Effect of a Locking Plate and Teriparatide for Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fracture: Two Case Reports of Curved Femurs

Atypical Femoral Fractures Insights and Enigmas

Clinical Analysis of Femur Shaft Insufficiency Fractures

C. S. H. Grace, K. W. B. Kelvin, C. T. Wei & T. B. Yeow

Pharmacy Management Drug Policy

AACE/ACE Osteoporosis Treatment Decision Tool

Atypical Femoral Fractures With Long Term Bisphosphonates Use

A Case of Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fracture with Histomorphometrical Evidence of Osteomalacia

Treatments for Osteoporosis Expected Benefits, Potential Harms and Drug Holidays. Suzanne Morin MD FRCP FACP McGill University May 2014

Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Osteoporosis Treatment: part I: 3 to 5 years treatment

Medicine and the Current Correlation Between Fosamax and Fractures

CIC Edizioni Internazionali

Drug Intervals (Holidays) with Oral Bisphosphonates

Femoral Shaft Cortical Pathology associated with longterm Alendronate Therapy: A New Classification

TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS HOLIDAYS OR NO HOLIDAYS? Nelson B. Watts, MD OSTEOPOROSIS AND BONE HEALTH SERVICES CINCINNATI, OHIO

Pharmacy Management Drug Policy

Pharmacy Management Drug Policy

Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture in a Patient on Alendronate Therapy: A Case Report

Among the most important concerns regarding the

Bisphosponate Fractures: Elusive but Dangerous

ATYPICAL FEMORAL FRACTURES AFTER LONG-TERM BISPHOS- PHONATES THERAPY: CASE REPORT

ACP Colorado-Evidence Based Management of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis: An Overview. Carolyn J. Crandall, MD, MS

From Fragile to Firm. Monika Starosta MD. Advocate Medical Group

Clinical Specialist Statement Template

Osteoporosis Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Parathyroid Hormone Analog for Osteoporosis Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Criteria Program Summary

Osteoporosis: How to Manage Long- Term Use of Bisphosphonates AKA Now What? David E Feinstein, DO, CCD November 15 th, 2017

Disclosures D. Black. Bisphosphonates: Background, Efficacy and Recent Controversies. Page 1. Research Funding: Novartis, Merck

Updates in Osteoporosis. I have no conflicts of interest. What Would You Do? Mrs. C. What s New in Osteoporosis. Page 1

Fracture=Bone Attack:

CASE 1 WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO TREAT? FACTS CONCERNS

Osteoporosis/Fracture Prevention

Bilateral Femoral Neck Insufficiency Fractures after Use of a Long-term Anti-resorptive Drug Therapy for Osteoporosis: A Case Report

Pathogenesis, Management and Prevention of Atypical Femoral Fractures

The Bare Bones of Osteoporosis. Wendy Rosenthal, PharmD

Module 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment. William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC

Assessment and Treatment of Osteoporosis Professor T.Masud

Case Report Effect of Long-Term Use of Bisphosphonates on Forearm Bone: Atypical Ulna Fractures in Elderly Woman with Osteoporosis

FRAX assessment. The patient. The patient. Which drug? UK NOGG Guidance 3/22/17. Safety issues with osteoporosis treatments

Osteoporosis. Overview

Osteoporosis Management

Osteoporosis: Are your bones at risk of fracturing? Rachel Wallwork, MD Internal medicine resident Massachusetts General Hospital

Forteo (teriparatide) Prior Authorization Program Summary

Bilateral Insufficiency Fracture of Medial Subtrochanteric Area of the Femur: A Case Report

What is Osteoporosis?

Atypical Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures: Second Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Vol. 19, Bulletin No. 108 August-September 2012 Also in the Bulletin: Denosumab 120mg for Bone Metastases

Monitoring Osteoporosis Therapy

Page 1

Administration of Denosumab (PROLIA ) for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and in men at increased risk of fractures

Current Issues in Osteoporosis

Download slides:

Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Page 1. Updates in Osteoporosis. I have no conflicts of interest. What is osteoporosis? What s New in Osteoporosis

Bisphosphonate Use and Atypical Fractures of the Femoral Shaft

Updates in Osteoporosis

1/28/2017. Orthopedic Implications Of Osteoporosis Introduction. Orthopedic Implications Of Osteoporosis Introduction

PEM GUIDE CHILDHOOD FRACTURES

Atypical Femur Fx Update. Faculty Disclosures

Page 1. Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis: What s New and Controversial in 2018? What s New in Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis and Lupus. Andrew Ruthberg, MD University Rheumatologists

Submission to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence on

Presenter: 翁家嫻 Venue date:

Clinician s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis

Chau Nguyen, D.O. Rheumatologist Clinical Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine at Western University of Health Sciences

Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis: What s New and Controversial in ? What s New in Osteoporosis

Frequency of Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures in Asymptomatic Patients on Long- Term Bisphosphonate Therapy

CIC Edizioni Internazionali

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 July 2010

Name of Policy: Zoledronic Acid (Reclast ) Injection

Page 1. New Developments in Osteoporosis. What s New in Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis challenges

1

2017 Santa Fe Bone Symposium McClung

Spontaneous Non-Traumatic Stress Fractures in Bilateral Femoral Shafts in a Patient Treated with Bisphosphonates

HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE RECOMMENDED MEDICATION REQUEST GUIDELINES

Bisphosphonate-related bilateral atypical femoral fractures be aware and beware

OTA Highlight Paper. Surgical Treatment Improves Clinical and Functional ACCEPTED. Outcomes for Patients who Sustain Incomplete

Surgical Care at the District Hospital. EMERGENCY & ESSENTIAL SURGICAL CARE

Osteoporosis: A Tale of 3 Task Forces!

Current and Emerging Strategies for Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis. Definition

This Coverage Policy applies to Individual Health Insurance Marketplace benefit plans only.

Learning Objectives. Controversies in Osteoporosis Prevention and Management. Etiology. Presenter Disclosure Information. Epidemiology.

Osteoporosis Treatment Overview. Colton Larson RFUMS October 26, 2018

SpongeBone Menopants*

9/9/2015 OSTEOPOROSIS WHAT S NEW AND ON THE HORIZON IN SCREENING, DRUG HOLIDAYS, SUPPLEMENTS, CONSERVATIVE THERAPY DISCLOSURES

Pediatric Fractures. Objectives. Epiphyseal Complex. Anatomy and Physiology. Ligaments. Bony matrix

AMERICAN RED CROSS FIRST AID RESPONDING TO EMERGENCIES FOURTH EDITION Copyright 2006 by The American National Red Cross All rights reserved.

Advanced medicine conference. Monday 20 Tuesday 21 June 2016

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 July 2010

Controversies in Osteoporosis Management

Therapeutic Updates in the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis

FRAX Based Lebanese Osteoporosis Guidelines Second Update for Lebanese Guidelines for Osteoporosis Assessment and Treatment

S H A R E D C A R E G U I D E L I N E Drug: Denosumab 60mg injection Indication: treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Transcription:

International Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Case Reports 9(1): 1-6, 2017; Article no.ijmpcr.33170 ISSN: 2394-109X, NLM ID: 101648033 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Bisphosphonate-Associated Bilateral Atraumatic Ulna Fractures W. Banks Hinshaw 1* and Jennifer P. Schneider 2 1 Markle and Hinshaw Gynecology and Harris Regional Hospital, 7190 Ellijay Road, Franklin, North Carolina, USA. 2 Arizona Community Physicians, 3052 N Palomino Park Loop, Tucson, AZ 85712, USA. Authors contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Author WBH wrote the first draft of the paper. Both authors contributed equally to the detailed editing of the paper and the acquisition of the references. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/IJMPCR/2017/33170 Editor(s): (1) Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Chapman University, Harry and Diane Rinker Health Sciences Campus, Irvine, CA, USA. Reviewers: (1) Alicia García Falgueras, The Official College of Psychologists, Madrid, Spain. (2) Aleksander L. Sieron, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. (3) Ali Al Kaissi, Orthopedic Hospital of Speising, Vienna, Austria. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/18741 Case Study Received 1 st April 2017 Accepted 17 th April 2017 Published 22 nd April 2017 ABSTRACT Aims: From 2003, low-impact fractures have been reported in association with bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. Most have involved the proximal femur, but over 100 cases involving other anatomic locations have been published. The 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research case definition for subtrochanteric or femoral shaft atypical fractures (AFF) included non-comminution, transverse orientation, cortical thickening, beaking, and minimal trauma. Because other anatomic locations were excluded, there has been an unstated assumption since then that these atypical fractures are limited to the femur. We present a case of bilateral fractures of the proximal shaft of ulna after bisphosphonate therapy. The similarity to the AFFs suggests that the anatomic location of atypical fractures is not limited to the femur. Methodology: Case report. Results and Discussion: After 15 years of BP use and several months of pain, the patient was diagnosed with a non-displaced transverse fracture of the left proximal ulnar diaphysis. Subsequently she developed a similar insufficiency fracture in her right ulna, and 2 months later the *Corresponding author: E-mail: williambh@frontier.com, kulsetsiyi@earthlink.net;

left fracture broke spontaneously. It was non-comminuted, transverse, with cortical thickening, and beaking. It was preceded by prodromal pain. This similarity to the AFFs suggests that the anatomic location of atypical fractures is not limited to the femur. Conclusions: Non-femoral atypical-type fractures have been associated with BP therapy. These atypical fractures suggest a systemic rather than local BP effect, and their exclusion has thus understated the incidence of BP-associated atypical fractures. Keywords: Bisphosphonates; atypical fractures; ulna; metatarsal; alendronate; zoledronate; teriparatide; denosumab. 1. INTRODUCTION Beginning with index cases first reported in 2003, there has been a steadily increasing number of fractures reported associated with bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. The varied anatomic locations of the first small group of cases [1] suggested a generalized effect. Recognition of the BP-association was slow in coming but case reports continued to accumulate and concern continued to mount until the leadership of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) convened [2] a Task Force to address the problem. For reasons that were never clearly defined, the report of this committee was limited to fractures of the femur. The report surveyed the Englishlanguage medical literature between January 1990 and April 30, 2010 and tabulated some 37 case series reporting femur fractures meeting a definition derived from commonalities among the clinical descriptions; 97% of the fractures sodefined were in patients who had received BP therapy. These were termed atypical femur fractures (AFFs). The exact number of individual fractures reported was somewhat indeterminate. 153 affected individuals were found in the published works but 35 were acknowledged likely to be duplicates. Thus perhaps 118 affected individuals were found. In 35 of these, the fractures were bilateral, thus making the total number of femur fractures associated with BP therapy reported between 1990 and April 2010 to be ~153. These fractures were severally associated with alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, pamidronate, and zoledronic acid. Fractures associated with BP-therapy described in the same publications which did not meet the derived AFF definition were not mentioned [examples: 3, 4] in the Task Force report. The index fractures associated with BP therapy presented by Odvina in 2003 were not all femur fractures. Four individuals were described who suffered one proximal femur, two pelvic, two sacral, and an undisclosed number of rib, metatarsal, and metacarpal fractures among them. Thus only 1 out of the original 8 (or more) of the initially reported BP-associated fractures involved the femur. A later publication [3] defined that single proximal femur fracture as subtrochanteric. Our survey [5] of the medical literature on BP-associated non-femur atypicaltype fractures discovered 13 case series in the same 1990-2010 interval reporting at least 29 individuals suffering more than 50 non-femur breaks. This demonstrates that these fractures associated with BP-therapy were being reported at about 1/3 the rate of the femur reports at the time the ASBMR committee chose to focus on the femur only. We present here a case of bilateral fractures of the proximal shaft of the ulna associated with long-term BP use in a woman who, because of childhood polio has, for her entire adult life, been able to ambulate only with crutches, transferring her weight to her arms. Except for the anatomical location, the long-term clinical course in this case was similar to that of the AFFs we have previously described [6]. 2. PRESENTATION OF CASE A now 67-year-old Caucasian woman contracted polio at about one year of age. Post-polio syndrome deprived her of the use of her legs and she has never walked unsupported. For most of her life, she has used axillary crutches for ambulation. In her teens she sustained fallassociated fractures of both hands, and compression fractures of the spine, diagnosed later, may have originated at that time as well. She has led an independent, courageous, and productive life, including three successful pregnancies resulting in healthy live births. She maintained long-term professional employment. For many years, she has been a patient under the care of the same multispecialty clinic. In December 1995, when she was 46, her first bone mineral density scan results met the WHO definition of osteoporosis and she was started on 2

alendronate 10 mg/day. Seven years later (February 2002) her medication was changed to alendronate 70 mg/week. She confirms that she was very compliant in her use of this treatment. In November 2008, after 13 years of alendronate use, it was replaced by zoledronic acid 5 mg (Reclast ) infusions. These were continued approximately annually for 3 infusions, the last one in January 2011. In August 2010, about 5 months prior to the last infusion, she was diagnosed with a non-displaced transverse fracture of the left proximal ulnar diaphysis [Fig. 1, 1a]. She had been experiencing deep pain in her upper forearm for several months previously. This fracture was managed conservatively with casting and she continued using axillary crutches. In January 2011, a similar pain developed in her right forearm; an X-ray showed another insufficiency fracture in the right proximal ulnar diaphysis. This was essentially revealed by a mild cortical reaction. In early March, the left fracture broke spontaneously and required ORIF [Fig. 2]. This non-comminuted transverse break with a cortical reaction, beaking, and prodromal pain parallels the AFF characteristics defined by the ASBMR task force [1]. By the time the operated left side was declared healed 10 months later, the symptoms and radiological evidence of the right ulnar pathology had resolved. During this healing interval, she ambulated exclusively by motorized wheelchair, thus alleviating the weight-bearing strain on her arms. About 2 months after the completed fracture (and 5 months after the last zoledronic acid infusion) she was started on teriparatide (Forteo ) daily 20 mcg sc. Two months after the completion of 24 months of teriparatide, she was given 60 mg of denosumab (Prolia ) sc. One year later after several months of foot pain, an atraumatic transverse fracture of the proximal one-third of the diaphysis of the 5 th right metatarsal bone [Fig. 3] was diagnosed, despite her using only Fig. 1. Ulnar insufficiency fracture Fig. 1a. Detail of Fig. 1 Fig. 2. Completed ulnar fracture Fig. 3. 5 th metatarsal fracture 3

crutches to walk in the interval. This fracture healed with conservative management within seven months. She declined further treatment with denosumab. During the interval of the treatments described above, the general health of the patient remained stable. She did not suffer a stroke or any other new medical condition. The post-therapy fractures described were not associated with falling. Because of instability of her right ankle unrelated to the above problems, at age 65 she underwent elective right tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for cavovarus deformity of the foot. [6] This surgery, which requires no fracture healing, was successful and resolved as expected. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this report we present a case of a patient treated with long-term BP therapy who developed atypical ulnar fractures. Among the more than 200 cases which we have collected of individuals who have incurred BP-associated fractures, this case is unique in that this individual never had any stress applied to the femurs before or during that therapy. Her case is presented in support of the hypothesis that the effect of BP-therapy on the skeleton is systemic. She has ambulated her entire life using her arms instead of her legs, thus transferring to her arms the forces normally applied to the legs. Similar fractures have been reported in patients employing crutches but not using BP drugs. [7] Among patients developing femur fractures in association with BP therapy, fractures meeting the AFF definition are in the longest highly stressed portions of the femur, the lateral subtrochanteric region and the lateral shaft (ST/FS). It seems likely that the increased standing stress on these locations is the reason the AFFs occur there [8]. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that populations that have a genetically determined increased bowing of the upper femur also have an increased incidence of AFFs [9]. Support is also found in the high incidence of insufficiency fractures in BP-treated patients in another highly-stressed long bone: the metatarsal. The present case is an example. Her ulna fractures meet many of the diagnostic standards of the AFFs and she developed a subsequent metatarsal fracture. Among the 81 patients we previously described [5] who experienced BP-related AFFs, 35% also suffered one or more metatarsal fractures subsequent to their AFF. There are clinical consequences to the conclusion that bisphosphonate use can result in atypical fractures in bones other than the femur. Stopping strong anti-resorptive drugs when an associated fracture is suspected or diagnosed has been recommended by the USFDA for many years [10]. Despite a diagnosis of an undisplaced insufficiency fracture of the proximal left ulna, the present patient was continued on zoledronic acid. This was followed by completion of that fracture and diagnosis of a contralateral insufficiency lesion. After anabolic therapy, she was again started on a strong antiresorptive, denosumab, and afterwards incurred the described slow-healing metatarsal fracture. We have reported elsewhere [11] a similar case where a second AFF followed the use of denosumab administered after anabolic therapy which had been used to assist recovery from an initial BP-associated AFF. In 2011 the United Kingdom Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency decided that their previously announced caution regarding the BP side effects was at an end and the AFFs were declared [12] a class-effect of the BP drugs. The Committee for Medicinal products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency announced the same conclusion [13]. The increasing reports of non-femur fractures with the characteristics attributed by the ASBMR to the ST/FS femur suggests that this class effect should be extended all skeletal locations where the anatomic characteristics of the fracture are sufficient to suggest association with the drugs [14-20]. It is difficult to envision this extension happening without a consensus development from a responsible multidisciplinary agency such as the ASBMR. But it is equally difficult to imagine a systemic medication affecting a single bone in the human body to the exclusion of all others. 4. CONCLUSION This report presents a case of bilateral fractures of the proximal shaft of the ulna associated with long term bisphosphonate use in a woman who has ambulated her whole life using crutches. Except for the location, the anatomic characteristics and course of these fractures was parallel to the atypical femoral fractures associated with bisphosphonate therapy 4

described by the ASBMR leadership. We conclude that this case contributes evidence that the BP-related atypical fractures are not limited to the mid-femur. CONSENT Both authors declare that written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. ETHICAL APPROVAL It is not applicable. COMPETING INTERESTS Author WBH has provided expert testimony in civil litigation involving bisphosphonates. Author JPS declares that she has that no competing interests. REFERENCES 1. Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: Report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(11): 2267 2294. 2. Odvina CV, Rao DS, Pak CYC, Maalouf N, Zerwekh JE. Adynamic bone disease during bisphosphonate therapy: Should we be concerned? American Society of Bone and Mineral Research Annual Meeting; 2003. Presentation number SU344. 3. Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, Pak CYC. Severely suppressed bone turnover: A potential complication of alendronate Therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;3:1294 1301. 4. Schneider JP. Should bisphosphonates be continued indefinitely? An unusual fracture in a healthy woman on long-term alendronate. Geriatr. 2006;61(1):31-33. 5. Hinshaw WB and Schneider JP. Bisphosphonate-associated atypical fractures that are not Atypical Femoral Fractures. Brit J Med & Med Res. 2017;19(7):1-17. DOI:10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31269. 6. Schneider JP, Hinshaw WB, Su C, Solow PJ. Atypical femur fractures: 81 individual personal histories. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(12):4324-4328. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2012 2590. 7. Bennett GL, Cameron B, Njus G, Saunders M, Kay DB. Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Assessment of Stability. Foot & Ankle Internat. 2005;26(7):530-536. 8. Venkatanarasimha N, Kamath S, Kambouroglou G, Ostlere SJ. Proximal ulna stress fracture and stress reaction of the proximal radius associated with the use of crutches: a case report and literature review. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2009;10: 155 157. 9. Koch JC. The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat. 1971;2(1):242-243. 10. Lo JC, Hui RL, Grimsrud CD, Chandra M, Neugebauer RS, Gonzalez JR, et al. The association of race/ethnicity and risk of atypical femur fracture among older women receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy. Bone. 2016;85:142-47. 11. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Safety update for osteoporosis drugs, bisphosphonates, and atypical fractures. Oct. 13, 2010. Available:http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugS afety/ucm229009.htm 12. Hinshaw WB and Schneider JP. One Antiresorptive Too Many: A Case Report and Clinical Opinion. Internat J Med Pharma Case Rep. 2016;8(3): 1-6. 13. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) CHMP Decision on bisphosphonate class effect. Drug Safety Update June. 2011;4(11):A1. 14. This report may be accessed at Available:http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ind ex.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/referral s/bisphosphonates/human_referral_00026 6.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580024e99 15. Smith ER, Allen MR. Bisphosphonate induced reductions in rat femoral bone energy absorption and toughness are testing rate-dependent. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(8):1317 1322. 16. Ettinger B, Burr DB, Ritchie RO. Proposed pathogenesis for atypical femoral fractures: Lessons from material research. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;55(2):495-500. 17. Lopez JR. Bisphosphonates: Do they prevent or cause bone fractures? Drug Therap Bull Navarre. Spain. 2009;17(9): 65-76. 18. Ma S, Goh EL, Jin A, Bhattacharya A, Boughton OR, Patel B, et al. Long-term effects of bisphosphonate therapy: 5

perforations, microcracks and mechanical properties. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:43399. DOI: 10.1038/srep43399. 19. Donnelly E, Meredith DS, Nguyen JT, Gladnick BP, Rebolledo BJ, Shaffer AD, et al. Reduced cortical bone compositional heterogeneity with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women with intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;17(3): 672-678. 20. Currey JD. The mechanical consequences of variation in the mineral content of bone. J. Biomechanics. 1969;2:1-11. 2017 Hinshaw and Schneider; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Peer-review history: The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here: http://sciencedomain.org/review-history/18741 6