Results of the Parent Satisfaction Survey May 2013

Similar documents
FIGURE 16 Average Annual Age-Adjusted Incidence and Mortality Rates* by Race, Pennsylvania Residents, Age-Adjusted Rate

CANCER of the THYROID

CANCER of the THYROID

Hospitalizations for Opioid Overdose Population Differences

1 in 37 Hospitalizations were Related to Opioids in (36,712 Opioid-Related Hospitalizations)

Hospitalizations for Opioid Overdose 2016

Pennsylvania Hospital Admissions for Diabetes

The Role of HMOs in Managing Diabetes Technical Notes

Pennsylvania s Super-Utilizers of Hospital Care

County Agency Address York Adams Drug and Alcohol Commission

ODP FY Data Report. Office of Developmental Programs Data Report

Asthma Burden. in the C HILDREN S H EALTH I NSURANCE PROGRAM Population. Asthma Control Program Pennsylvania Asthma Surveillance System

Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations in Pennsylvania

Current Student-CWEL. Q1 You are enrolled in which program: CWEB (1) CWEL (2)

2012 Rankings Pennsylvania

Long Term Graduate. Q1 Are you currently employed? Yes (1) No (2) Q2 Which program did you graduate from most recently?

Challenges to State & Local Infectious Disease Surveillance & Response. Stephen M. Ostroff MD Pennsylvania Department of Health September 2012

Transitioning the HIV-Positive Inmate from Prison to Community: The Power of Collaboration

Understanding Improving and Deteriorating Therapeutic Alliance in Youth and Family Therapy

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. The BANANA SPLIT. Rapid Response Team

Diabetes-Related Inpatient Hospitalizations in Pennsylvania 1997

Psychotropic Medication for Dependent Children

We Need It and We Need It Now

The changing landscape of marijuana in Pennsylvania: examining access, use, and perceptions

APPENDIX. Proposed Feral Swine Actions For Pennsylvania. Prepared By. Pennsylvania Feral Swine Task Force. November 16,

Delivery System Strategies

Surveying Pennsylvania s Families of Young Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

SBIRT for Substance Use Disorders (Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment)

Measuring the Quality of Pennsylvania s Commercial HMOs

ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY NETWORK NEWS

Measuring the Quality of Pennsylvania s Commercial HMOs

2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania

Prostate Cancer. Recommendations for Improving the Health of Pennsylvania Men

A Report of the Findings from the 2009 Recovery Oriented Systems Indicators (ROSI) Consumer Survey for Dauphin County

SUGGESTED ROUTING: X Company Management Labor Bulletin #8-13 X Field Supervision May 17, 2013 X Other Safety Directors REMINDER

TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES IN PENNSYLVANIA

To find PA Says NO MORE on If you re not connected with us on Twitter, follow us. We ll follow you back!

Dental Provider Reference Guide

Arboviral Surveillance and Control Annual Report: Pennsylvania, 2014

OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES BULLETIN

P ennsylvania S t a te Da ta C enter RESEARCH BRIEF. Causes of Death in the Commonwealth: Pennsylvania Trends in Mortality, 2015

Hospital Performance Report

President s Report Brian McHale, CI/CT. Greetings to all of the. Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Recovery Organizations Alliance Preliminary Report to DDAP Certified Recovery Specialist Warm Hand Off Survey Results

Hospital Performance Report

2014 Report to the Legislature

Annual Report. PA Northeast is managed by Help Line which is a program of Family Service Association of Northeastern Pennsylvania.

Children labeled medically complex enrolled in Early Intervention. Susan Wiley, MD Jareen Meinzen-Derr, PhD Dan Choo, MD

statistical Report lvhn.org / CARE 1

Center for Rural Pennsylvania Public Hearing on the Heroin Crisis Facing Pennsylvania. Clarion University August 19, 2014

Care. No matter what.

These materials are Copyright NCHAM (National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management). All rights reserved. They may be reproduced

Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Bureau of Autism Services

Special Report: Lessons Learned from Cross Systems Mappings in Pennsylvania Counties November 20, 2015

CHILDHOOD HEALTH. Key findings

Delivery Regions Response Region States Participation Actual / Potential Federal Region Name FTA Region # A CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT 2 / 6 New England 1

Areas to Address with All Families

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM

Michael Macione, AuD; & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD

General Information. * Are you a hospital or an LHD. Hospital LHD

the time is now: wisconsin s journey towards improving early intervention services

Michael Macione, AuD, & Cheryl DeConde Johnson, EdD. a critical link within the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) process.

JFK-HCP Webinar - Partnering to Support Children with Hearing Loss - 2/27/14 1

Focus on Heart Attack

Maine s Collaborative Early Intervention Model You can do it too!

I. Language and Communication Needs

STAY WELL GET CARE, Keep your family smoke-free and tobacco-free. newsletter for members of AmeriHealth Caritas Pennsylvania

Family-centered early intervention for families and children who are deaf or hard of hearing

Simplifying Reporting of Communication Development Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss

What is the Role of the Hearing Specialist in Early Steps? Karen Anderson, PhD Coordinator of Early Intervention Services for Hearing and Vision

1 PERSON 2 PERSON 3 PERSON 4 PERSON 5 PERSON 6 PERSON 7 PERSON 8 PERSON

My View On Services. Karen Aguilar, MJ, Coalition Director

Maine s Family Centered Exploration of Communication Opportunities

About North Carolina Data. Population 9,382,609 Live Births = 128,180 Children Identified with Hearing Loss = 201

Improving Ohio s Health: Controlling Diabetes and Hypertension

AN EXAMINATION OF OPIOID DRUG CHALLENGES AND RESOURCES IN LACKAWANNA AND LUZERNE COUNTIES

Illinois Stroke Data Report

Governor s Commission for a Drug-Free Indiana. Commission s Purpose. Local Coordinating Councils 10/18/2013

CHILDREN WITH CMV: DON T FORGET THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY INTERVENTION. Paula Pittman, PhD Director, Utah Parent Infant Program for the Deaf

Hearing loss is the most frequently occurring congenital

California Newborn Hearing Screening Program: Tracking Our Babies

Northeast Component Pennsylvania Dental Hygienists Association

A PARENT S GUIDE TO DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EARLY INTERVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

VERIFICATION FORM for DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING

Syringe Exchange: Indicators of Need & Success March 2015

Expression of Interest. Coaching and Mentoring: Auditory-Verbal Therapy

ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY NETWORK NEWS

TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION DEVICE LOAN APPLICATION. Personal Information. Date of Application. City County State Zip Code

Hospital Medicare Payment (2014 Data)

Work Destination Report - Where Workers are Employed Who Live in the Selection Area - by Counties Boyle County, Kentucky: All Counties

AGENCIES BY AREA. National

Indiana Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI)

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI): The Role of the Medical Home

Figure 1. Fentanyl-Related Drug Overdoses, Ohio,

Dental. I H C P A n n u a l S e m i n a r

Recovery With Older Adults

B -3 Programs of Various Communication Modes Collaborating to Serve Families

Trends across the country. Indiana Early Hearing Detection 4/13/2015

Referrals may come from a variety of sources. They may be referrals of a child with a suspected loss, a failed screening, or a confirmed hearing

INDIANA PRIMARY CARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT Report

Transcription:

Results of the Parent Satisfaction Survey May 2013 Early Intervention Technical Assistance/EITA, Bureau of Early Intervention Services, OCDEL, Early Hearing Detection and Intervention/EHDI & the Division of Newborn Screening and Genetics, PA Department of Health 1

Structure of the Report: 1. Demographics 2. Experiences Before EI 3. EI Response Highlights A. Summary of Strengths B. Areas for Improvement 2

1. Demographics 3

Rate of Return 369 surveys sent; 17 undeliverable 352 surveys sent; 106 returned Return rate: 30% Q #22: County Distribution Surveys were returned from 37 out of 56 counties (66%) Range of Responses: from 1 to 13 responses per county 4

Surveys Sent and Returned by County, 2013 County of Residence 2013 # Sent # Rec d County of Residence # Sent # Rec d County of Residence # Sent # Rec d Adams 1 0 Fayette 8 3 Perry 3 0 Allegheny 34 9 Franklin 6 1 Philadelphia 38 13 Armstrong 1 0 Forest 1 1 Pike 1 0 Beaver 6 1 Fulton 1 0 Potter 0 0 Bedford 1 0 Greene 0 0 Schuylkill 1 1 Berks 14 3 Huntingdon 1 1 Snyder 2 0 Blair 4 1 Indiana 1 0 Somerset 2 1 Bradford 1 0 Jefferson 2 0 Sullivan 0 0 Bucks 15 5 Juniata 1 1 Susquehanna 1 0 Butler 7 2 Lackawanna 3 1 Tioga 1 0 Cambria 4 0 Lancaster 16 6 Union 0 0 Cameron 0 0 Lawrence 1 0 Venango 2 2 Carbon 2 1 Lebanon 5 2 Warren 0 0 Centre 0 0 Lehigh 13 5 Washington 5 1 Chester 23 6 Luzerne 8 1 Wayne 1 0 Clarion 1 1 Lycoming 4 1 Westmoreland 8 1 Clearfield 2 1 McKean 3 0 Wyoming 0 0 Clinton 2 0 Mercer 2 2 York 12 4 Columbia 1 0 Mifflin 0 0 Crawford 2 1 Montgomery 23 5 Cumberland 5 2 Monroe 3 0 Total # counties out of 67 Dauphin 6 2 Montour 0 0 Delaware 21 5 Northampton 9 5 Totals Sent & Received 353 106 Elk 0 0 Northumberland 2 2 Erie 10 6 56 84% 37/56 66% 5

6

Demographics: Surveys Returned Q #27. My relationship to the child, 91 Mothers 9 Fathers 4 Grandmothers 1 Aunt 105 7

Q #31. Does your child have additional special needs/diagnoses? 2010 2011 2012 2013 Yes 27% 18% 12% 12% No 73% 81% 88% 88% 8

Q #28: Child s Age Now Number Percentage Birth to 3 months 1 1% 4 6 months 1 1% 7 9 months 6 6% 10 12 months 6 6% 13 months 2 years 30 29% 25 months 3 years 34 32% Older than 3 years 26 25% 9

2. Experiences Before Early Intervention 10

Q # 1. My child was first screened for a hearing loss at birth or before s/he was 1 month old. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Yes 93% 92% 96% 97% 97% No 7% 8% 4% 3% 3% 11

Q #2. If the results of your child s first screening indicated a need for a second screening test, what happened next? A. 2 nd screen done before discharge B. after d/c returned to hospital for 2 nd screen 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 _ 31% 39% 41% 42% 36% 25% 23% 20% 19% C. in Dr. 's office 3% 2% 0 1% 2% D. Referred to an Audiologist outside 23% 37% 31% 33% 26% E. other 15% 5% 7% 5% 11%

Q #3. After your child was screened for a hearing loss, did someone suggest you see an audiologist for more comprehensive tests? 2013 Yes 93% No 7%

Q #4. My child was first seen by an audiologist for a comprehensive hearing test (not a screening test) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 a. < 3 months old. b. < 6 months old. c. < 9 months old. 67% 59% 78% 78% 76% 19% 22% 12% 10% 14% 3% 6% 1% 3% 0% d. < 1 year old. 1% 5% 3% 3% 2% e. > 1 year old. 10% 8% 6% 6% 8%

Q #5. How long did it take you to get an appointment for a comprehensive audiological evaluation with an audiologist? 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 a. Within 30 days from my request. b. Between 31-60 days from my request. c. Between 61-90 days from my request. d. More than 91 days from my request. 56% 72% 77% 76% 77% 29% 23% 18% 19% 20% 11% 5% 2% 4% 3% 4% (1) 3% 1% 0%

a. within 30 days from 1 st screen #6. How long did it take from the first hearing screening to get a diagnosis? 2011 2012 2013 66% 61% 82% b. 31-60 days 13% 14% 12% c. 61-90 days 6% 12% 0% 15% 13% 6% d. more than 91 days 16

#7. The information I received about my child's hearing loss was similar among the medical professionals (pediatrician, audiologist, Ear/Nose & Throat doctor, etc.) 2011 2012 2013 Yes 92% 89% 90% No 8% 11% 10% 17

#29: Child s Age Beginning EI, 2013 Number Percentage Birth to 3 months 41 40% 4 6 months 33 32% 7 9 months 4 4% 10 12 months 4 4% 13 months - 2 years 25 months 3 years 16 15% 5 5% 18

#30: Child s Age when Hearing Services Began in Early Intervention: Number Percentage Birth to 3 months 39 38% 4 6 months 35 34% 7 9 months 5 5% 10 12 months 3 3% 13 months - 2 years 25 months 3 years 16 16% 4 4% 19

3. EI Response Highlights 20

12. Children who are d/hh may have an addition to their IFSP called a Communication Plan. This is not required but is an option. Does your child have a communication plan in addition to the IFSP? Yes 29% No 71% 21

A. Summary of Strengths in EI #8. My child was assessed in all developmental areas to determine his/her progress. 98% #19. My family s daily routines were considered when planning for my child s EI services. 97% #13. I was given access to at least one staff person who is qualified in the areas of deafness and hearing loss. 95% #25. Overall, I am satisfied with my child s EI services. 95% #26. Overall, my child s EI services made me feel better equipped to care for his/her needs. 95% 22

A. Summary of Strengths in EI Practices #16. I received written materials to help me support my child. 94% #18. I am satisfied with the level of knowledge regarding hearing loss of my EI Service Coordinator. 93% #23. The information I was given about the variety of hearing technologies available met my needs. 93% #20. The information I received about the early development of communication, speech and language met my needs. 91% #21. The quality of the information I received on the early development of hearing skills met my needs. 91% 23

A. Summary of Strengths in EI #24. I am satisfied that I can have an active role in the EI program in my area. 89% #15. I was given information about a variety of hearing technologies. 86% #17. I was given information about national, state and local organizations related to deafness and hearing loss. 85% 24

A. Summary of Strengths in EI Practices Q #14. In EI, I was given information about several different communication options/methods. Option/Method 2010 Yes 2011 Yes 2012 Yes 25 2013 Yes Auditory-Verbal 87% 95% L + SL L + SL Auditory-Oral 86% 93% 86% 89% ASL 89% 86% 88% 87% Cued Speech 61% 70% 57% 67% Total Communication 77% 82% 80% 85% #22. I am satisfied that the information I received about a variety of different communication options was provided in an unbiased way. 87% 92%

B. Areas for Improvement 26

2012-13 Areas for Improvement # 9. I was given opportunities for contact with other parents of children with deafness or hearing loss. 75% #10. Did you receive parent support information about Hands and Voices Guide By Your Side of PA? 75% # 11. I was offered opportunities to meet adults who are Deaf or hard of hearing. 48% 27

Family Connections & Training Opportunities Pa Hands & Voices Guide By Your Side Workshops and Videoconferences Early Visual Language and Visual Learning in Infants and Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Early Development of Social Communication in Infants, Toddlers and Young Children with Hearing Loss Developing Culturally Effective Practices for Infants/Toddlers who have Family Members who are Deaf Great Start Conference (August 5-6, State College) http://www.outreach.psu.edu/conference/lowincidence Orientation to Deafness and Hearing Loss Online Course for Service Coordinators & others 28

Online learning portal www.eita-pa.org 29

30

31