Digestibility to swine of energy and nutrients in field peas.

Similar documents
FIELD PEAS FIELD PEAS. in Diets Fed to Swine

ENERGY AND NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY IN DISTILLERS DRIED GRAIN WITH SOLUBLES FED TO GROWING PIGS

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

Use of Soybean Products in Diets for Swine

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

Growth Performance of Growing Pigs Fed Crude Protein-Adequate or. Deficient, Low Phosphorus Diets with Graded Levels Of Phytase

Amino Acid Digestibility and Energy Concentration of Fermented Soybean Meal and Camelina Meal for Swine 1

Soya in animal nutrition: which improvements can be expected?

Energy 01/02/2013. Jean NOBLET INRA 30/01/ Méthodes de prévision des valeurs nutritives des aliments pour le porc: contexte international

August 22, 2017 M. D. Lindemann

What do we know about feeding Peas, Lentils and Flax?

METHODS TO DETERMINE AMINO ACID DIGESTIBILITY IN CORN BY-PRODUCTS

VARIATION IN CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SOYBEAN HULLS 1. F. F. Barbosa, M. D. Tokach, J. M. DeRouchey, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, and S. S.

Nutrient Analysis of Sorghum Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles from Ethanol Plants Located in the Western Plains Region 1

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames. 4

Amino acid digestibility and energy concentration of fermented soybean meal and camelina meal for swine

P. A. Thacker* and Shiyan Qiao 1 Department of Animal Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8, Canada

Energy and nutrient digestibilities in wheat dried distillers grains with solubles fed to growing pigs

THE IMPACT OF NUTRITION ON REDUCING THE IMPACT OF THE SWINE INDUSTRY ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Ruurd T. Zijlstra, Ph.D.

ALTERNATIVE FEED INGREDIENTS FOR PIGS

What We ve Learned About Feeding Reduced-Oil DDGS to Pigs

The Effect of Enzymes, Steeping and Dietary Protein Level on Apparent Fecal Digestibility and Fecal Output in Pigs fed Corn- Soybean Meal Diets.

Development and Evaluation of a New Precision-Fed Chick Assay for Determining Amino Acid Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy of Feed Ingredients

Dr. Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte FINAL REPORT. January 14, 2011

Overview of Completed DDGS Swine Research

Feeding DDGS to pigs: What is new? Hans H Stein. University of Illinois. Urbana

Overview of Production, Nutrient Profile, Physical Characteristics, and Quality Assessment of New Generation DDGS

An Update on Current Amino Acid Requirements and Energy for Swine K STATE. RESEARCH and EXTENSION. KSUswine.org

R. O. Gottlob, J. M. DeRouchey, M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, S. S. Dritz 2, C. W. Hastad, K. R. Lawrence, and D. A.

Jennifer E. Wubben 1, David M. Albin 1, Michelle R. Smiricky 2 and Vince M. Gabert 3. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Introduction

Soybean Use Poultry FACT SHEET MEAL

A COMPARISON OF WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE AND SPRAY-DRIED ANIMAL PLASMA IN DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

Effect of feed intake on endogenous losses and amino acid and energy digestibility by growing pigs. V. Moter and H. H. Stein

Effect of feeding schedule on apparent energy and amino acid digestibility by growing pigs

Effects of Increasing Crystalline Amino Acids in Sorghum-or Corn-based Diets on Nursery Pig Growth Performance

Effects of Xylanase in High-Co-Product Diets on Nutrient Digestibility in Finishing Pigs 1

Threonine Is More Limiting Than Valine in Diets of Lactating Sows with High Rates of Body Protein Loss

THE purpose of this paper is to provide a brief

Regaining Competitiveness: Alternative Feedstuffs for Swine

Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to Non-Ruminants

Dietary, processing and animal factors affecting energy digestibility in swine 1

COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL PROTEIN CORPORATION 740 FISH MEAL AND SPECIAL SELECT MENHADEN FISH MEAL IN NURSERY PIG DIETS

Effect of PHYTASE 5000 (Granular) on the Performance and Nutrient Digestibility of Growing Finishing Pigs

A TECHNICAL UPDATE ON THE USE OF ENZYMES IN ANIMAL FEED HADDEN GRAHAM GLOBAL SERVICES DIRECTOR

Determining the threonine requirement of the high-producing lactating sow. D.R. Cooper, J.F. Patience, R.T. Zijlstra and M.

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Animal Feed Science and Technology

EFFECTS OF PEPSOYGEN AND DRIED PORCINE SOLUBLES 50 IN NURSERY PIG DIETS 1

What are the 6 Nutrients. Carbohydrates Proteins Fats/Oils (Lipids) Vitamins Minerals Water

Variation in chemical composition of soybean hulls

DETERMINING THE THREONINE REQUIREMENT OF THE LACTATING SOW 1

USE OF DDGS AS A FEED INGREDIENT ETHANOL AND DDGS OVERVIEW AN EVOLVING ETHANOL INDUSTRY

THE EFFECT OF CORN DISTILLERS DRIED GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES INCLUSION RATE AND BIOCONVERSION ON THE NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND ENERGY METABOLISM OF PIGLETS

The Value of Distiller s Dried Grains with Solubles in Swine Feeding Programs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

BROILER. Nutrition Specifications. An Aviagen Brand

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Broiler Nutrition Specifications

Calcium Digestibility and Requirements for Digestible Calcium by Growing Pigs

4/7/2014 SCOTT RADCLIFFE IMPACT OF DIET COMPOSITION ON MANURE CHARACTERISTICS DISCLAIMER

O. J. Rojas; H. H. Stein 2 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana

DDGS: An Evolving Commodity. Dr. Jerry Shurson University of Minnesota

Amino Acid, Carbohydrate, and Fat Composition of Soybean Meals Prepared at 55 Commercial U.S. Soybean Processing Plants

Overview of Production and Nutrient Content of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

CHOOSING THE RIGHT PHYTASE TO MAXIMIZE PHYTATE DEGRADATION

Alternative Feed Ingredients in Swine Diets II: Use, Advantages and Disadvantages of Common Alternative Feedstuffs

Nutrient and Energy Utilization by Swine. Hans H. Stein. Department of Animal Sciences and Division of Nutritional Sciences. University of Illinois

Recent Developments in Net Energy Research for Swine

Keeping Control of Feed Costs in an Uncertain Market

Dr Erhard Briedenhann AFMA Forum Sun City South Africa March 2016 Sponsorship by:

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine, Dairy, and Beef. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Dietary Amino Acid Responses of Layers. W. A. Dozier, III Associate Professor Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University Auburn, AL, USA

Open Access RESEARCH. Changsu Kong 1* and Olayiwola Adeola 2

Summary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

New Technologies to Aid in Evaluation of Alternative Feedstuffs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Grain Sorghum: Current Considerations for Use in Animal Feeds, Facts and Myths

THE purpose of this paper is to provide

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

FEEDING MANUAL Feed manual TOPIGS Finishers

Summary. Procedures. (Key Words: Sorghum, Distillers Grains, Waxy, Endosperm, Finishing Pigs.) Introduction

Certification GMP, HACCP Certification ISO 9001:2008

INFLUENCE OF NUTRIDENSE LOW PHYTATE 1 CORN AND ADDED FAT ON GROWING-FINISHING PIG GROWTH PERFORMANCE

The Real Value of Canola Meal

Can Canola meal replace Soybean meal?

Evaluation of Fermented Soybean Meal Sources in Diets for Nursery Pigs 1

ROSS 308 AP. Nutrition Specifications PARENT STOCK. An Aviagen Brand

Evaluation of Heparin Production By-Products in Nursery Pig Diets 1

Grain Sorghum as a Feedstuff For Livestock

Apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in gelatin-based diets by growing pigs

Evaluation of a microbially-converted soybean meal as a substitute for fishmeal in nursery pig diets

Nutrient digestibility in canola meal for broilers: Effects of oil extraction method and fractionation by air classification

Energy Value of Corn Milling Co-Products in Swine B. J. Kerr, USDA-ARS / P. V. Anderson, Iowa State University / G. C. Shurson, University of

Effects of Increasing Wheat Middlings and Net Energy Formulation on Nursery Pig Growth Performance

Soy Protein Concentrate a manifold Product group

Quality Characteristics and Nutritional Profiles of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

EFFECTS OF INCREASING CRYSTALLINE AMINO ACIDS AND THE SUBSEQUENT CHANGE IN DIET NET ENERGY ON GROWING PIG PERFORMANCE 1

Success with weaned pigs

Goals. Goals. Maintenance Rations 4/25/2014. Week 4 Lecture 12. Clair Thunes, PhD

animal F. N. Almeida 1, J. K. Htoo 2, J. Thomson 3 and H. H. Stein 1 identify ways of estimating the degree of heat damage in SBM and DDGS.

Transcription:

Digestibility to swine of energy and nutrients in field peas. Hans H. Stein, PhD. Department of Animal Sciences University of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801 1

Summary Field peas (Pisum sativum L.) have a nutrient profile that is intermediate between corn and soybean meal. The digestibility of most amino acids in field peas is similar to that in soybean meal, and the concentration of digestible energy (3,864 kcal DE per kg DM) in field peas is similar to that in corn. The apparent total tract digestibility of P in field peas is 55 and 65%, respectively, in diets without or with microbial phytase. Starch is digested by approximately 90% in the small intestine and 100% over the entire digestive tract. The alpha galactosides in field peas are well digested in the small intestine of pigs, and other fibers are mainly digested in the large intestine. The digestibility of energy may be improved by 3 4 percentage units upon extrusion at 115 o C. Likewise, the digestibility of most nutrients will also be improved if the peas are extruder prior to feeding. Amino Acid Digestibility Field peas have a moderate concentration of crude protein (Approximately 22%). The pea protein has a relatively high concentration of lysine but low concentration of methionine, cysteine, and tryptophan compared with soybean protein (Table 1). The ileal digestibility of most amino acids in US-grown field peas is comparable to the digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal (Stein et al., 2004). However, the digestibility of methionine, cysteine, and tryptophan in field peas is lower than in soybean meal (Table 1) and the digestibility of threonine tends to be lower in field peas than in soybean meal. The digestibility values for amino acids in US-grown field peas concur with published reports on the digestibility of amino acids in field peas grown in 2

Europe (Grala et al., 1999), Australia (van Barneveld and Batterham, 1994), and in Canada (Fan and Sauer, 1995; 1999). The reason why certain amino acids have a lower digestibility than others may be related to their location within the pea seed. Albumin, which has a relatively high concentration of methionine, threonine, and tryptophan, is less digestible than other proteins in the seed (le Guen et al., 1995). This may explain why lower digestibilities for these amino acids have been reported. The effect of thermal treatment on the ileal digestibility of amino acids has been investigated in a few experiments. For field peas grown in Canada and in the US, improvements of 4 to 6 percentage units in the apparent and standardized ileal digestibilities for most amino acids have been reported as a result of extrusion or micronization (Owusu-Asiedu et al., 2002; Stein et al., unpublished). The amino acids that have the lowest digestibility in raw field peas (i.e., methionine, threonine, and tryptophan) have the largest improvement in digestibility upon thermal treatment. Carbohydrate Digestibility The carbohydrate fraction in field peas grown in Europe mainly consists of sucrose (3 4%), alpha-galactosides (3 4%), starch (40 45%), and non-starch polysaccharides (15 20%), whereas the concentration of lignin is less than 1% (Bengala Freire et al. 1991; Canibe and Bach Knudsen, 1997). Unpublished data from South Dakota State University indicate that the concentration of starch and non-starch polysaccharides in field peas grown in the US is similar to the values reported for European-grown field peas. The apparent ileal digestibility of sucrose is close to 100%, and the apparent ileal digestibility of starch in European-grown field peas is between 85 3

and 97% (Bengala Freire et al. 1991; Canibe and Bach Knudsen, 1997). In raw US-grown field peas, the apparent ileal digestibility of starch is approximately 90%, but this value is increased to approximately 95% if the field peas are extruded at 115 to 155 o C (Table 2). The alpha-galactosides (i.e., raffiose, stachyose, and verbascose) require the enzyme alpha-galactosidase for digestion. This enzyme is not synthesized by mammals, but there is some intrinsic alpha-galactosidase present in field peas. Intestinal microbes may also produce this enzyme; alpha-galactosides are, therefore, relatively well digested by swine and have an apparent ileal digestibility of 78% (Bengala Freire et al., 1991). The nonstarch polysaccharides (i.e., ADF and NDF) have a low digestibility in the small intestine but, due to the microbial fermentation in the hindgut, the total tract digestibility of the non-starch polysaccharides is between 80 and 87% in both raw and extruded field peas (Canibe and Bach Knudsen, 1997; Stein et al., unpublished; Table 2). Phosphorus Digestibility Field peas contain approximately 0.40% phosphorus (NRC, 1998; Stein et al., 2006). Of the total concentration of phosphorus, 45 to 52% is bound in the phytate complex, and therefore, has a low digestibility by swine and poultry. However, the unbound phosphorus is highly digestible and the overall digestibility of phosphorus in US grown field peas fed to growing pigs is 55% (Table 3). For European-grown field peas, apparent total tract digestibility values of 42 to 51% have been reported (Jongbloed and Kemme, 1990; Helander et al., 1996). However, the digestibility of phosphorus can be improved by 10 to 15 percentage units if microbial phytase is added to diets containing field peas (Helander et al., 1996; Stein et al., 2006; Table 3). Thus, the digestibility of 4

phosphorus in field peas is considerably greater than in corn and soybean meal and the addition of field peas to diets will reduce the need for inorganic sources of phosphorus. The excretion of phosphorus in the manure will also be reduced if field peas are included in the formulas. Energy Digestibility The concentration of gross energy in field peas grown in the US is comparable to that in corn (Stein et al., 2004). Likewise, the digestibility of energy and the concentration of digestible energy (DE) in field peas are not different from corn (Table 4). The value for DE in field peas grown in the US (3,864 kcal DE per kg DM) is also comparable to values reported for field peas grown in Canada (3,862 kcal DE per kg DM; Zijlstra et al., 1998) and in Europe (3,904 kcal DE per kg DM; Grosjean et al., 1998). However, the concentration of metabolizable energy in field peas is slightly lower than in corn. As shown in Table 2, the digestibility of energy can be improved by 2 3 percentage units if field peas are extruded prior to feeding. 5

References Bengala Freire, J., A. Aumaitre, and J. Peiniau. 1991. Effects of feeding raw and extruded peas on ileal digetibility, pancreatic enzymes and plasma glucose and insulin in early weaned pigs. J. Anim. Phys. Anim. Nutr. 65:154-164. Canibe, N., and K. E. Bach Knudsen. 1997. Digestibility of dried and toasted peas in pigs. 1. Ileal and total tract digestibilities of carbohydrates. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 64:293-310. Fan, M. Z., and W. C. Sauer. 1995. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in peas for pigs with the direct, difference and regression methods. Livest. Prod. Sci. 44:61-72. Fan, M. Z., and W. C. Sauer. 1999. Variability of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in different pea samples for growing-finishing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79:467-475. Grala, W., M. W. A. Verstegen, A. J. M. Jansman, J. Huisman, and P. van Leeuwen. 1999. Apparent protein digestibility and recovery of endogenous nitrogen at the terminal ileum of pigs fed diets containing various soyabean products, peas or rapeseed hulls. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 80:231-245. Grosjean, F., D. Bastianelli, A. Bourdillon, P. Cerneau, C. Jondreville, and C. Peyronnet. 1998. Feeding value of pea (Pisum Sativum, L.) 2. Nutritional value in the pig. Anim. Sci. 7:621-625. Helander, E., Nasi, M., and Partanen, K. 1996. Effects of supplementary Aspergillus niger phytase on the availability of plant phosphorus, other minerals, and 6

nutrients in growing pigs fed on high pea-diets. J. Anim. Phys. Anim. Nutr. 76:66-79. Jongbloed, A. W., and Kemme, P. A. 1990. Apparent digestible phosphorus in the feeding of pigs in relation to availability, requirement and environment. 1. Digestible phosphorus in feedstuffs from plant and animal origin. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 38:567-575. le Guen, M. P. J. Huisman, and M. W. A. Verstegen. 1995. Partition of the amino acids in ileal digesta from piglets fed pea protein diets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 44:169-178. Owusu-Asiedu, A., S. K. Baidoo, and C. M. Nyachoti. 2002. Effect of heat processing on nutrient digestibility in pea and supplementing amylase and xylanase to raw, extruded, or micronized pea-based diets on performance of early weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 82:367-374. Stein, H. H., G. Benzoni, R. A. Bohlke, and D. N. Peters. 2004. Assessment of the feeding value of South Dakota grown field peas (Pisum sativum L.) for growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2568-2578. Stein, H. H., M. G. Boersma, and C. Pedersen. 2006. Apparent and true total tract digestibility of phosphorus in field peas (Pisum sativum L.) by growing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. (Submitted). van Barneveld, R. J., and E. S. Batterham. 1994. The effect of heat on amino acids for growing pigs. 2. Utilization of ileal digestible lysine from heat treated field peas (Pisum Sativum cultivar Dundale). Br. J. Nutr. 772:243-256. Zijlstra, R. T., J. F. Patience, S. L. Fairbairn, D. A. Gillis, and D. L. Whittington. 1998. 7

Variation in the digestible energy content of field peas for grower pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76 (Suppl. 1): 63 (Abstr.) 8

Table 1. Amino acid composition of the protein and amino acid and protein digestibility in field peas and soybean meal (as fed basis) a Ingredient: Field peas Soybean meal Item: % of % of crude SID b % of % of crude SID b ingredient protein ingredient protein Nutrient Crude protein 22.8 100 79.9 47.5 100 84.5 Arginine 1.87 8.20 92.8 3.48 7.32 93.0 Histidine 0.54 2.37 88.3 1.28 2.70 89.7 Isoleucine 0.86 3.77 83.4 2.16 4.55 86.3 Leucine 1.51 6.62 85.7 3.66 7.71 86.1 Lysine 1.50 6.58 88.1 3.02 6.36 88.4 Methionine 0.21 0.92 77.9 0.67 1.41 89.1 Cysteine 0.31 1.36 67.3 0.74 1.56 83.9 Phenylalanine 0.98 4.30 86.9 2.39 5.05 86.9 Tyrosine 0.71 3.11 84.7 1.82 3.83 87.2 Threonine 0.78 3.42 80.2 1.85 3.90 85.9 Tryptophan 0.19 0.83 54.3 0.65 1.37 78.5 Valine 0.98 4.30 78.2 2.27 4.78 82.7 a Data for amino acid concentration and composition are from NRC (1998). Data for SID of protein and amino acids are from Stein et al., 2004. b SID = standardized ileal digestibility (%). 9

Table 2. Effects of thermal treatment on the digestibility (%) of starch, NDF, ADF, and energy in field peas fed to growing pigs a Extrusion SEM b P-Value Item None 75 o C 115 o C 155 o C - Linear effect Apparent ileal digestibility Quadratic effect Starch 89.8 92.1 94.7 95.9 0.79 0.001 0.50 Energy 71.5 76.4 79.3 79.0 1.43 0.001 0.09 Apparent total tract digestibility Starch 99.2 99.6 99.7 98.6 0.45 0.50 0.20 NDF 81.3 85.2 86.3 73.2 6.83 0.50 0.30 ADF 79.5 83.2 84.8 71.9 7.71 0.60 0.40 Energy 89.0 91.8 93.3 91.7 0.78 0.02 0.01 a Unpublished data from South Dakota State University (N = 6). b SEM = standard error of the mean. 10

Table 3. Apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of calcium and phosphorus in field peas without and with added microbial phytase a Item Diet: Peas without phytase Peas with phytase b SEM c P-value ATTD, calcium, % 72.8 78.1 3.39 0.07 ATTD, phosphorus, % 55.0 65.9 4.64 0.004 a Data (N = 6) from Stein et al. (2006a). b Microbial phytase (Rhonozyme, DSM, Passippani, NJ) added in the amount of 695 units per kilogram (315 units per lb) of diet. c SEM = standard error of the mean. 11

Table 4. Energy concentration in field peas and corn a Item Ingredient: Field Peas Corn SEM b P-value Apparent digestible energy in DM, kcal 3,864 3,879 27 0.68 Metabolizable energy in DM, kcal 3,741 3,825 24 0.04 a Data (N = 6) from Stein et al. (2004). b SEM = Standard error of the mean. 12