THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Similar documents
Disclosures. How many people have heard a talk on DCBs? By show of hands, how many people here have used a DCB?

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

The Evolution of SFA Treatment Strategy with IN.PACT DCB

New Drug Coated Balloons in Femoro-Popliteal Disease in Korea

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

DCB From a Pre-Clinical Perspective: The Relevance of Paclitaxel Dose and Coating Integrity

DCB level 1 evidence review

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

NCT Teichgräber et al. Trials (2016) DOI /s x

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Luminor DCB in femoropopliteal lesions

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Drug eluting devices: Why paclitaxel works above the knee and sirolimus below the knee, is the stent or the drug?

Pre-clinical comparison of drug coated balloons. Renu Virmani, MD CVPath Ins5tute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Department of Radiology. EffPac - Trial:

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

The latest generation DEB

DESIGN GOALS AND PRE- CLINICAL EVIDENCE OF NEXT GENERATION DCB

DCB: What Is The Evidence?

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

Drug Elution, Data, and Decisions

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Best DCB outcomes in SFA TASC A&B lesions: EFFPAC-RCT 12-months follow-up

How DCB drug dose effects vessel healing. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

EffPac RCT: final 6-month results with the Luminor DCB

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

DCB + stent in the SFA

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

A study of downstream events of the two leading DCBs on the market. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

REFERENCE CODE GDME1058CFR PUBLICATION DATE SEPTEMBER 2013 DRUG-ELUTING BALLOONS APAC ANALYSIS AND MARKET FORECASTS

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Innovations are created to solve the limitations of an

Comparison of particulate embolization in different DCB formulations. Aloke V. Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD.

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Drug-Coated Balloons: Clinical Role in Coronary and Peripheral Interventional Therapy

Role of Covered Stents and Drug Eluting Balloons In Dialysis Access

Legflow DCB Safety / outcomes from the clinical trial program

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Clearing a Path for the Effective Treatment of Complex Arterial and Venous Disease

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been shown

Femoropopliteal disease: This is the State- of- the- art. Peter A. Schneider, MD Kaiser Hospital Honolulu, Hawaii

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Technological Perspectives for Endovascular Therapy of the Lower Limb

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

DURABLE. CONSISTENT. SAFE. IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon

Preliminary 12 Months results of the RAPID trial

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

DCB + BMS is not a DES

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Non stent based intracoronary drug delivery

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

Qizhuang Jin. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, China

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

The Evidence for Drug Coated Balloons Below The Knee:

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Future of stenting in the. Koen Deloose, MD Head Dept Vascular Surgery AZ Sint Blasius Dendermonde, Belgium

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

INTERVENTIONAL VASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPY. SeQuent Please OTW PERIPHERAL DRUG COATED BALLOON CATHETER

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

Technical Aspects for Treating AV Dialysis Fistulae with the IN.PACT DCB. Andrew Holden Auckland Hospital Auckland, New Zealand

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Transcription:

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES THE IDEA AND THE TECHNOLOGY FRANCESCO JATTA, PH.D. PROGRAM MANAGER

DISCLOSURES I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) None

DCB EVOLUTION FROM PACCOCATH TO MODERN DCBS First DEB: Paccocath 2001 Supported by Schering, Prof. Speck combines his contrast media Ultravist with Paclitaxel to develop the Paccocath clinical prototype DEB Clinical results showed reduction in restenosis compared to POBA Prof s Ulrich Speck and Bruno Scheller Paccocath Progresses to Commercial Use 2001-2006 Paccocath coating technology licensed to B. Braun for coronary Medrad acquires Paccocath license after Bayer acquires Schering 2010 Modified Paccocath technology now used by: SeQuent Please (B.Braun) Cotavance (Bayer/Medrad) Next Generation Coating is Developed: FreePac 2008 Invatec Launches IN.PACT 2009 Gunnar Tepe Introduced to Invatec thanks to Dr. Tepe, Prof. Speck collaborates with the company on next generation coating technology: FreePac and selects organic molecule, Urea, as FreePac s drug excipient Invatec is the first to launch 3 peripheral DEBs with IN.PACT Admiral (0.035 ), IN.PACT Pacific (0.018 ) and IN.PACT Amphirion (0.014 ) Several Startups start developing proprietary DCB concepts

DRUG-COATED BALLOON SYSTEM DCB Components Function Platform PTA Balloon Drug Delievery 0,035 / 0,018 / 0,014 Drug Paclitaxel Proven anti-proliferative drug 2-3.5 µg/mm 2 Excipient Device specific Facilitates drug transfer Coating Process Device specific Ensure consistency of drug deposition

DRUG COATED BALLOONS BASIC MODE OF ACTION THE EXCIPIENT PLAYS A MAJOR ROLE EXCIPIENT Manufacturing: PACLITAXEL & EXCIPIENT Balloon coated with matrix in semi-inflated state, then wrapped During transit to lesion: Majority of matrix protected within folds of the balloon DCB matrix coating: Paclitaxel + EXCIPIENT DCB inflation: Matrix contacts blood Blood hydrates the excipient The excipients helps releasing paclitaxel Paclitaxel Hydrophobic and Lipophilic Properties: Facilitates transfer from balloon and stickiness to vessel wall Diffuses through vessel wall deep into the media and adventitia Data on file atmedtronic (FS208; PS516)

WHY AN EXCIPIENT? THE EASY EXPLANATION Do nothing? No salt! It works

DCB WITHOUT EXCIPIENT 150 subjects randomized 1:1 in 4 sites Primary Endpoint: 6-month Late Lumen Loss No Excipient - > suboptimal Drug Transfer No difference in 6-month LLL between DCB vs. PTA arm

DURATION OF PACLITAXEL IS IMPORTANT FOR DURABLE EFFECT DES Relies on scaffold and polymers on prolonged contact with the tissue to elute paclitaxel over time DCB Without scaffold and polymers, DCB relies on efficient transfer and long-term residence of paclitaxel in-tissue Presence of solid phase paclitaxel in tissue provides a reservoir for sustained release of soluble drug Urea hydrates and releases Solid Phase Paclitaxel Solid Phase Paclitaxel embeds into tissue Solid Phase Paclitaxel provides sustained drug release Solid-Phase Paclitaxel 50 m DCB-treated iliofemoral artery section.

ALL DCBS ARE DIFFERENT IN DRUG DOSE AND EXCIPIENT Manufacturer DCB Dose (µg/mm 2 ) Excipient IN.PACT 3.5 Urea BARD Lutonix 2.0 Polysorbate & Sorbitol Spectranetics STELLAREX 2.0 PEG BIOTRONIK Passeo Lux 3.0 BTHC Boston Scientific Ranger 2.0 Citrate Ester Vascular Luminor 3.0??? COOK Advance PTX 3.0 none Aachen Resonance Elutax SV 2.2 none BIOSENSORS BioPath (prev. 3.0 Shellac FREEWAY) CARDIONOVUM Legflow 3.0 Shellac FDA approved

FIRST DIFFERENCE: THE DOSE % Inhibition of Neointimal Area 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 g Paclitaxel/mm 2 Balloon Surface PACLITAXEL EFFECTIVENESS WINDOW OPTIMIZED BETWEEN 2-4 µg/mm 2 1. Scheller B, et al. PTX Balloon Coating, a Novel Method for Prevention and Therapy of Restenosis. Circulation. 2004;110:810-814. 2. Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, et al. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of nonstent-based local drug delivery and DES in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006;240:411 418. 3. Cremers B, et al. Comparison of two different PTX-coated balloon catheters in the porcine coronary restenosis model. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009;98:325 330. 4. Cremers B, et al DEB: Very short-term

DOSE SELECTION: META ANALYSIS SHOWS BETTER OUTCOMES IN HIGHER DOSE DCBS Meta-analysis 11RCT 1609 overall patients Paclitaxel dose main determinant of the treatment effect size with a significantly worse treatment effect in the case of low-dose DCBs (2.0 μg). TLR reduction was more than 2 times higher in the standard-dose subgroup compared with the low-dose group.

SECOND DIFFERENCE: DRUG PHASE DETERMINES DURATION OF BIOLOGIC ACTIVITY Solid Paclitaxel Equal Amounts Drug Soluble Paclitaxel Long-Term Biologic Activity as solid phase paclitaxel Dissolves Short-Term Biologic Activity as soluble paclitaxel is Metabolized

INFLUENCE OF EXCIPIENT ON DISSOLUTION OF SOLID PHASE PACLITAXEL Paclitaxel Available in Solid Phase through 24 Hours 93% - IN.PACT Admiral DCB % Solid-phase Paclitaxel Available to Tissue 0% - Lutonix Urea does not impact rate of paclitaxel dissolution Polysorbate/sorbitol based acts as an emulsifier and accelerates drug dissolution

SOLID PHASE PACLITAXEL DICTATES THE LEVEL AND DURATION OF DRUG IN TISSUE Paclitaxel is available for both DCBs post-24 hours, but only one achieves sustained effect through slow release of solid-phase paclitaxel reservoirs

UNDERSTANDING THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE OUTCOMES SIMILAR TRIAL DESIGNS, DIFFERENT OUTCOMES AT 2 YEARS: WHY?. Primary patency rates, target lesion revascularization rates, and mean lesion lengths may be calculated differently, and therefore may not be directly comparable; chart is for illustration only.. IN.PACT SFA Trial values represent IN.PACT Admiral DCB arm as evaluated by 720-day Kaplan-Meier, patency defined as PSVR 2.4 and freedom from TLR defined here as clinical driven TLR; Laird J, et al. 24-Month Results from the IN.PACT SFA Trial. JACC 2015, LEVANT II values represent Lutonix 035 arm as evaluated by 730-day Kaplan-Meier, patency defined as PSVR 2.5 and freedom from TLR defined here as all TLR, p-value between Lutonix 035 and PTA 24-mo TLR not reported (NR); Presented by 100 Medtronic IN.PACT SFA Trial 10 100 Bard LEVANT 2 Trial 10 PERFORMANCE Primary Patency 1 80 60 40 8.9 cm 8.8 cm Δ 28.8% p < 0.001 9 8 7 Lesion Length (cm) 6 5 4 3 Primary Patency 1 80 60 40 6.3 cm Δ 5.6% p = 0.05 6.3 cm 9 8 7 Lesion Length (cm) 6 5 4 3 20 2 20 2 0 78.9% IN.PACT Admiral 2 (n=220) 50.1% PTA 2 (n=111) 1 0 0 58.6% Lutonix 035 3,4 (n=316) 53.0% PTA 2 (n=160) 1 0 IN.PACT Lutonix Drug Paclitaxel Paclitaxel DESIGN Excipient Urea Polysorbate + Sorbitol Dose ug/mm2 3.5 2.0

3 KEY FACTORS FOR DCB EFFICACY 1. ANTIPROLIFERATIVE AGENT (PACLITAXEL) Drug content on balloon surface (1) Drug Dose 3.5 µg/mm 2 vs. 2.0 µg/mm 2 2. TISSUE TRANSFER EFFICIENCY 1 Coating characteristics (Hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity) 1-4 Excipient 5 Coating technique 6 (2) Acute Drug Transfer Tissue Transfer* 2. PACLITAXEL TISSUE RESIDENCY 2 Solubility (solid vs. soluble phase) Duration of retention during restenotic cascade 7 Homogeneity of distribution (3) Drug Retention Time 1. Seidlitz et al. PLOS One 2013; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083992. 2. Afari & Granada. Endovascular Today August 2012; 53-58. 3. Granada et al. Open Heart 2014;1:e000117. 4. Creel et al. Circ Res; 2000;86:879-884. 5. Radke et al. EuroIntervention 2011;7: 730 737. 6. Buszman et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6(8):883-90. 7. Forrester et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:758-769.

IN.PACT DCB HAS PROVEN LONG-TERM EFFICACY IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Primary Patency at 3 Years Freedom from CD TLR at 3 Years 1. Freedom from core laboratory-assessed restenosis (duplex ultrasound PSVR 2.4) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization through 24 months (adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee blinded to the assigned treatment). Clinically-driven TLR adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee, blinded to the assigned treatment based on any re-intervention at the target lesion due to symptoms or drop of ABI of 20% or >0.15 when compared to post-procedure baseline ABI. Freedom from 30-day device and procedure-related death and target limb major amputation and clinically-driven TVR within 12 (24) months

OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF FRENCH REPUBLIC: MEDTRONIC'S IN.PACT ADMIRAL ENLISTED FOR ADD-ON REIMBURSEMENT First peripheral DCB on the list One of the first non-implantable devices to get add-on reimbursement in France.

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS: THE IDEA AND THE TECHNOLOGY FRANCESCO JATTA, PH.D. PROGRAM MANAGER MEDTRONIC PERIPHERAL VASCULAR

CONCLUSIONS 1. Drug Coated Balloon technology use Paclitaxel as anti proliferative agent to address neo-initimal hyperplasia 2. The DCB coating formulation (drug dose + excipient) plays a vital role in transfering drug to the vessel wall and sustaining solid phase paclitaxel in the tissue 3. Different coating formulation show different rates of paclitaxel dissolution, leading to strong differences in solid phase drug retention in tissue 4. Level 1 evidence supports use of DCBs in the arterial space (SFA), encouraging signals in AV Access need to be confirmed by evidence from multicenter RCTs