PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

Similar documents
Disclosures. How many people have heard a talk on DCBs? By show of hands, how many people here have used a DCB?

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

The TANGO Trial: A phase II below-the-knee study investigating the adventitial micro-infusion of Temsirolimus after PTA or atherectomy

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Rationale and algorithm for below-the-knee acute gain optimization

New approaches for drug delivery in BTK arteries

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Adventitial Drug Therapy Below-the-Knee: Update on LIMBO and TANGO

Endovascular Innovations Today and Tomorrow. Zaheed Tai, DO, FACC, FSCAI Winter Haven Hospital Heart of Florida

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

DURABLE. CONSISTENT. SAFE. IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

The latest generation DEB

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

CLI: Patient level Risk Factors and CLI Outcomes

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

IN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA FAILURE

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

Adventitial Drug Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Patterns of Vessel Calcification and Clinical Relevance

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

ESVB State of the art: DES, DCB and the role of debulking. Gunnar Tepe, Rosenheim

The Evolution of SFA Treatment Strategy with IN.PACT DCB

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

Alternative methods of drug delivery in BTK vessels Initial insights from the TANGO trial

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Innovations are created to solve the limitations of an

How DCB drug dose effects vessel healing. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Legflow DCB Safety / outcomes from the clinical trial program

Role of Covered Stents and Drug Eluting Balloons In Dialysis Access

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

Dealing with Calcification in BTK Arteries: Is Lithoplasty the Answer?

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Drug delivery devices for BTK treatment

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

Vessel Preparation Prior to DCB and Stenting: How to Do It.

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

The Utility of Atherectomy and the Jetstream Atherectomy System

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

DCB From a Pre-Clinical Perspective: The Relevance of Paclitaxel Dose and Coating Integrity

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Accurate Vessel Sizing Drives Clinical Results. IVUS In the Periphery

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy System treatment of calcified lesions: Intravascular OCT analysis

Drug Elution, Data, and Decisions

DISRUPT PAD. (( Data Summary )) DISRUPT PAD Data Summary SPL Rev. B 2016 Shockwave Medical Inc. All rights reserved.

Biology of in-stent restenosis and rational for debulking

Comparison of Angiographic Dissection Patterns Caused by Long vs Short Balloons During Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Femoropopliteal Occlusions

Transcription:

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

PACLITAXEL VS RAPAMYCIN Paclitaxel essentially freezes the microtubules that are in place during cell division. The cells cannot complete cell division and recognizes that something is wrong and destroys itself. This process is called apoptosis or programmed cell death. Rapamycin works a little differently in that it affects a different pathway that essentially puts the cell to sleep and by doing that it prevents the cell from proliferating. Eventually the Rapamycin is metabolized and the cell wakes up and can operate normally again.

PACLITAXEL PREVENTS CELLULAR DIVISION AND REPLICATION, Drug PROVIDING A STRONG ANTI-RESTENOTIC EFFECT Paclitaxel (Cytotoxic) Interferes with cell division Rapamycin/Sirolimus (Cytostatic) Interferes with cell growth Cytotoxic drugs stabilize microtubules, preventing division in the final stages of the cellular replication cycle and leading to cell death (apoptosis) M G 2 Mitosis Cell prepares for mitosis G 1 Protein synthesis DNA synthesis S Cytostatic drugs hold a cell in G 0 phase, arresting growth but allowing cell to continue functioning 3 3 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

STUDIES SHOWING CHANGES IN NEOINTIMAL INHIBITION BASED ON VARYING CONCENTRATIONS OF PACLITAXEL Drug Dose-dependent response up to 3-4 µg/mm 2 (effective dose) Less than a ~2.5 μg/mm 2 dose shows a decreased therapeutic benefit Above a 4 μg/mm 2 dose indicates a limited, incremental efficacy gained 1. Margolis J, McDonald J, Heuser R, Klinke P,Waksman R,VirmaniR Desai N, Hilton D. Systemic nanoparticle paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) for in-stent restenosis I (SNAPIST-I): A first-in-human safety and dose-finding study. Clin Cardiol 2007;30:165-170 2. Cremers B et al. Comparison of two di erent paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters in the porcine coronary restenosis model. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009; 98:325-330 3. Cremers B. et al Drug-eluting balloon: Very short-term exposure and overlapping. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 201 206 4. Scheller B. et al. Paclitaxel Balloon Coating, a Novel Method for Prevention and Therapy of Restenosis Circulation. 2004;110:810-814 5. Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, et al. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of nonstent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006;240:411 418 6. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC. Paclitaxel (Taxol).N engl J Med 1995;332:1004-1014 4 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

PACLITAXEL CONCENTRATIONS FOLLOWING TREATMENT SUGGEST BOTH SAFETY AND EFFICACY Drug Tissue Detectable levels of drug over 180 days in both arms (therapeutic dose and 3x safety margin) At 320 days no quantifiable drug is identified in the targeted tissue area (therapeutic dose) Plasma No drug quantified after 48 hours (therapeutic dose) No drug quantified after 672 hours (3x safety margin dose ) Drug concentrations drop 50% within the first 30 min Safety Margin=3x dose Porcine ilio-femoral model - Data on file at Medtronic Inc. 5 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

AN EXCIPIENT SUPPORTS THE UPTAKE OF DRUG BY VESSEL TISSUE Acts as a molecular spacer to increase paclitaxel surface exposure Facilitates paclitaxel transfer through its hydrophilic properties Excipient Tissue Concentration Blood Concentration R.Virmani CIRSE 2012 Oral Presentation 6 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

COATING TECHNOLOGY PROVIDES RELIABLE AND UNIFORM DRUG DELIVERY Coating DESIGN OBJECTIVE: DURABLE / SCALABLE COATING Balloon coating in semi-inflated shape: DESIGN OBJECTIVE: UNIFORM COATING Longitudinal Coating Thickness Circumferential Coating ~ 60-70% of dose protected within balloon folds 1 1 experimental data on file at Medtronic 7 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

Mechanism of Action DCB MECHANISM OF ACTION FACILITATES THE TRANSFER OF DRUG DEEP INTO VESSEL TISSUE IN.PACT Admiral balloon matrix coating: Paclitaxel Urea - excipient that controls drug release DCB inflation: Matrix coating contact with the blood Urea hydrates causing the release of paclitaxel Paclitaxel binds to the wall due to its hydrophobic and lipophilic properties Paclitaxel penetration: Through vessel wall deep into the media and adventitia Interferes with the causes of restenosis Can remain in the vessel wall for over 180 days at therapeutic levels 1 1 Data on file at Medtronic (GLP Study FS208; GLP Study PS516) 8 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

Treatment Strategy PROVISIONAL STENTING RATE IS DEPENDENT ON LESION LENGTH Scaffolds still needed but likely at rates proportional to lesion complexity Provisional stent rates in DCB trials are a function of lesion length [1] Rosenfield K TCT 2013; [2] Tepe G et al. N Engl J Med 2008; [3] Tepe CX 2014; [4] Werk M et al. Circulation 2008; [5] Micari A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012; [6] Zeller T CX 2013 oral presentation; [7] Werk et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; [8] Schmidt A LINC 2013 oral presentation 9 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

Primary Patency Late Lumen Loss DEB IS EFFECTIVE IN CALCIFIED Objective: Assess effect of calcium on IN.PACT DCB efficacy 60-patient registry SFA de-novo: average Lesion Length 6.1 cm Chronic Total Occlusion: 31.7% Systematic PTA pre-dilatation followed by IN.PACT DCB Treatment Strategy LESIONS Calcium distribution and severity affect Late Lumen Loss and Primary Patency Severe calcium may represent a barrier to drug absorption F.Fanelli LINC 2013 Calcium Evaluation Calcium distribution evaluation by CTA (circumferential) and DSA (longitudinal) 10 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

IN.PACT SFA Trial IN.PACT ADMIRAL IS THE NEW STANDARD FOR PRIMARY PATENCY Highest Reported Primary Patency of all SFA Technologies* (p<0.001 by log-rank test) Primary patency is defined as freedom from clinically-driven TLR and freedom from restenosis as determined by duplex ultrasound (DUS) Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) 2.4 *Qualitative Comparison. Not Meant for Head-to-Head Comparison. 11 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

DEB: THE NEW STANDARD FOR CD-TLR Lowest Reported Clinically-Driven TLR rate of all SFA Technologies* IN.PACT SFA Trial Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 12 Months 25% 20% P<0.001 20.6% 15% 10% 5% 2.4% 0% IN.PACT Admiral PTA 1. Clinically-driven TLR defined as any re-intervention due to symptoms or drop of ABI/TBI of >20% or >0.15 compared to post-procedure ABI/TBI 2. Actual event rate by frequency ratio algorithm calculation *Qualitative Comparison. Not Meant for Head-to-Head Comparison. 12 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

Treatment Strategy TREATMENT STRATEGY AVOID GEOGRAPHIC MISS Pre-dilatation Drug-Coated Balloon (Primary Therapy) Spot Stent Postdilatation STAY WITHIN DCB AREA 1. PRE-DILATATION Required for all lesions, prior to DCB procedure Standard PTA 1 mm less than reference vessel diameter (RVD) Balloon length should not be greater than the planned DCB length 2. ATHERECTOMY Recommended in severely calcified lesions 3. DRUG-COATED BALLOON DCB diameter:rvd = 1:1; length 1 cm beyond lesion on both ends Inflation time 3 minutes Inflation pressure < RBP as required to reach full DCB expansion 4. POST-DILATATION If residual stenosis 50% or flow limiting dissection Standard or high pressure PTA balloon diameter 1:1 to RVD Short / focal length as necessary to treat the extent of residual stenosis or dissection 5. PROVISIONAL SPOT STENTING For persistent residual stenosis 50% or flow limiting dissections Minimum length as necessary to fully treat the residual stenosis or dissection 13 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14

Perivascular tissue Adventitia Media Lumen 14 RESTENOSIS SUMMARY Lumen loss INJURY Stretching Denudation Leukocyte adherence Negative remodeling Neointima Recoil Injury response programs Inflammation Phenotypic switch: quiescent proliferative and synthetic Recruitment Proliferation Fibrosis Inflammation Progenitor cell differentiation Myofibroblast proliferation Fibrosis Microvascular networks Paracrine factors Lumen loss

15 RESTENOSIS BEGINS WITH INFLAMMATION INJURY INFLAMMATION, RECRUITMENT PROLIFERATION, MIGRATION FIBROSIS, HYPERPLASIA Timeframe: Hours to Days Weeks Months Agents: Dexamethasone Paclitaxel, -limus compounds

16 INFLAMMATION IS AT THE ROOT OF RESTENOSIS

17 DANCE STUDY DESIGN clinical effectiveness evaluation of adventitial DEX after PAD intervention, vs contemporary published data Prospective, Single Arm, Multicenter Trial Subject population (n=300), 150 ATX / 150 PTA Assess safety and feasibility of perivascular dexamethasone delivery following SFA/popliteal artery revascularization OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness outcomes of adventitial DEX delivered by Bullfrog Device SFA / Pop Lesion Successful crossing of lesion & successful revasc. Dex Delivery Bullfrog Micro- Infusion Catheter injection Followup 1, 6, 12, 18, 24

18 DANCE N=300 De novo or non-stented restenotic SFA and/or popliteal lesions > 70% Lesions maximum 15 cm in length Rutherford 2-4 Enrollment complete 12/15/2015 Baseline angiogram and biomarker blood draw (1/3 of pts) Enrolled Subjects to be followed for 24 Months 150 PTA 150 atherectomy Adventitial DEX treatment 24-hour blood draw for biomarkers (1/3 of pts) 1-month blood draw for biomarkers (1/3 of pts) Clinical, hemodynamic and duplex U/S follow-up at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24 months

19 THE BULLFROG MICRO-INFUSION DEVICE

20 EXAMPLE BULLFROG CASE Angioplasty used to open vessel.... Bullfrog device inserted to distal target first After drug delivery to paint the vessel, follow up angiogram shows good result

SUCCESSFUL INFUSION 21 Bullfrog Device with balloon inflated After 3 minutes, Full perivascular dispersion >15cm of SFA Inflated Bullfrog Micro- Infusion Device

22 WHAT S NEXT BTK Study US Kicking off Q2 2016 BTK Study Germany/OUS Kicking off January 2016

Treatment Strategy TREATMENT STRATEGY AVOID GEOGRAPHIC MISS Pre-dilatation Drug-Coated Balloon/infusion (Primary Therapy) Postdilatation 1. PRE-DILATATION Required for all lesions, prior to DCB procedure Standard PTA 1 mm less than reference vessel diameter (RVD) Balloon length should not be greater than the planned DCB length 2. ATHERECTOMY Recommended in severely calcified lesions 3. DRUG-COATED BALLOON vs DIRECT MEDIAL INFUSION 4. PROVISIONAL SPOT STENTING For persistent residual stenosis 50% or flow limiting dissections Minimum length as necessary to fully treat the residual stenosis or dissection Spot Stent STAY WITHIN DCB AREA 23 UC201504192 EN Medtronic, Inc. 2014. All Rights Reserved. Medtronic Confidential. For distribution in the US only. 12/14