Beef Checkoff Funded Nutrient Database Improvement Research Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
NATIONAL BEEF : UNDERSTANDING AND ACTION FSIS 2011 MANDATORY NUTRITIONAL LABELING REGULATION

NATIONAL BEEF : UNDERSTANDING AND ACTION FSIS 2011 MANDATORY NUTRITIONAL LABELING REGULATION

NUTRITION Nutrition Overview Zinc Iron Protein B-Vitamins Selenium Phosphorous Good Fat vs. Bad Fat Fat & Cholesterol: The Whole Story Lean Beef

Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat and Poultry Products

LEAN MATTERS. Chronicling Beef s Change from Gate to Plate. A Distinctive Public-Private Collaboration

LEAN MATTERS. Chronicling Beef s Change from Gate to Plate A Distinctive Public Private Collaboration

Pr oject Summar y. Cataloging Beef Muscles A Review of Muscle Specific Research from Fed and Non-fed Cattle

Over the past 30 years, nutritional aspects of beef continually

Grain fed beef is sourced from cattle that have been fed on a nutritionally balanced, high energy ration for a minimum specified number of days.

The Power of Pork. Peggy Anne Hawkins, DVM Director of Research for Veterinary Provision Cannon Valley Veterinary Clinic

Nutrition. Nutrition. Contents:

Sampling and Analysis Project Canadian Nutrient File. Josephine Deeks 33 rd NNDC, New Orleans April 17, 2009

THE EFFECT OF BREED GROUP AND AGE AT FEEDING ON BEEF CARCASS COMPOSITION

(Key Words: Implants, Holstein, Tenderness, Yields, Beef.)

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

2011 North Dakota State Meat CDE Written Test

The Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention

Sampling for food composition SAFOODS Symposium 9 November 2011

Changes in the composition of red meat

SECTION 1. Introducing Simply Beef and the Beef Alternative Merchandising program

National Lamb Quality Audit and SSQA Update. Prepared for The American Lamb Board January 29, 2016

IMPLANT EFFECTS ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND MEAT QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY DIET

EFFECTS OF BREED OF SIRE AND AGE-SEASON OF FEEDING ON MUSCLE TENDERNESS IN THE BEEF CHUCK

Food Crediting in Child Nutrition Programs: Request for Information

MEATS EVALUATION AND TECHNOLOGY Updated 3/17/14

FPP.01: Examine components of the food industry and historical development of food products and processing.

The Effect of Hot Muscle Boning on Lean Yield, Cooler Space Requirements, Cooling Energy Req uiremen ts, and Retail Value of the Bovine Carcass

July 15, Dear Ms. Davis,

FACTORS INFLUENCING INTERMUSCULAR FAT DEPOSITION IN THE BEEF CHUCK

PATHWAY TO PROCESSING BUTCHER CERTIFICATE

US Whole Grain Regulatory & Policy Framework

Carcass Terminology. Goal (learning objective) Supplies. Pre-lesson preparation. Lesson directions and outline

DOMESTIC STRATEGIC ALLIANCE: VITAMIN E PROJECT

Predicting Tenderness in Beef Carcasses by Combining Ultrasound and Mechanical Techniques

MEATS EVALUATION & TECHNOLOGY

Survey Results:

Beef & Health A Fresh Look At Today s Beef

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

HARMONIZING NUTRIENT DATABASES FOR NORTH AMERICAN POPULATIONS: THE CARIBBEAN PERSPECTIVE. Pauline M. Samuda, Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute

UTILIZATION OF VIDEO IMAGE ANALYSIS IN PREDICTING BEEF CARCASS LEAN PRODUCT YIELDS

Consumer Preference for Pork Quality

Presentation of a method for the estimation of beef and veal production pattern and consumption in EU using SEUROP grid.

R E S E A R C H A N N U A L R E P O R T

Challenges and Approaches for

Nutrient Content of Bison Meat from Grass- and Grain-Finished Bulls

RE: 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee s Recommendations

National FFA Organization 2016 Meats Evaluation & Technology CDE Written Test

Recent Regulatory Changes for Meat & Poultry Labeling

Supplemental Vitamin C Alleviates the Negative Effect of High Sulfur on Meat Quality

CUTTING THROUGH LABELING CONFUSION

Project Summary. Producing premium grinds with brisket trimmings. Principal Investigator: S. B. Smith Texas A&M University

Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Legislation and Litigation: Challenges and Opportunities

Nutritional composition of beef: Effect of cattle diet. Aidan Moloney and Frank Monahan

BUILDING THE BRAND OF BISON DIANA RODGERS, RD

How does MSA meet consumer expectations. Sarah Strachan, MSA Program Manager

April 14, Dear Mr. Canavan:

Red meat and bowel cancer

Body Composition and Sensory Characteristics of Pork from CLA-Fed Pigs

Sampling Obtaining a portion that is representative of the whole. Some basic terms. Objectives of Sampling

Why Meat Judging? Assuring Quality Care for Animals Signature Program In-Service Lyda G. Garcia, PhD 9 November 2015

Nutritive Value of Meat. ANSC 3404 Texas Tech University. Why Beef? American Heart Association

Newsworthy Nuggets FSIS FERN Surveillance. Kristi McCallum APHL Annual Meeting June 8, 2016

--> Buy True-PDF --> Auto-delivered in 0~10 minutes. GB Table of contents 1 Scope... 3

The Strategic Marketing Institute Working Paper

THE BEEF NUTRIENT DATABASE IMPROVEMENT STUDY: RETAIL CUTS FROM THE LOIN AND ROUND. A Thesis HALEY LEE GRIMES

Photos of University Clocktower if they send them to me!!!!!!!

FDA Regulation of Claims on Dietary Supplement and Food Products

Beef s Benefits. Beef helps your mind develop! Beef keeps you looking good!

ARIZONA CTE CAREER PREPARATION STANDARDS & MEASUREMENT CRITERIA

MUSCLE STRUCTURE AND WATER RETENTION IN FRESH AND COOKED MEAT PRODUCTS

Washington Regulatory Update

The Diploma in Ruminant Nutrition

Eligibility The NCSF online quizzes are open to any currently certified fitness professional, 18 years or older.

Beef Grading. Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach

OVERVIEW OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES. Presented By William C. Balek International Sanitary Supply Association March 30, 2001

National FFA Organization 2014 Meats Evaluation & Technology CDE Written Test

Food Safety and Inspection Service: Labeling Guideline on Documentation Needed to Substantiate Animal Raising Claims for Label Submission

The Beef Solution Newsletter

TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY: REDUCING TRANS FAT IN THE DIET. Robert M. Reeves, President Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils

Jennifer Aalhus, Agriculture and Agri food of Canada

Foodborne Outbreak Linked to Pork Consumption. Jennifer Koeman, DVM, MSc, MPH, DACVPM National Pork Board

From Farm to Label How Nutrition gets to Point of Shelf Labeling Supermarket Dietitian Symposium 2012

LABELLING : Health Canada and CFIA s new requirement proposals. Part 3 Understand implications for all stakeholders GROUPEXPORT.CA

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the United States Standards for Grades of

National Pork Board Update. Pork Management Conference Bill Winkelman

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Food Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~

The Consumer Market for Chicken Raised Without Antibiotics,

EFFECTS OF COMBINATION ANABOLIC IMPLANTS ON BOXED- BEEF YIELDS OF SERIALLY SLAUGHTERED STEERS

Session Overview. Session Objectives. Location of Information on Labels. What is required on all labels? 5/21/2013

Estimating Consumption of Agricultural Commodities Using NHANES Dietary Intake Information:

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTAL VITAMIN D 3 ON MEAT TENDERNESS 1

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Development of a Multi-nutrient Data Quality Evaluation System

Meat Standards Australia Breeding for Improved MSA Compliance & Increased MSA Index Values

Improvising Claims. - Dr. R. B. Smarta

UPDATES ON NUTRITION LABELING AND CLAIMS REGULATIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES

NCBA On-Package Nutrition Labeling Pilot Research Project. Funded by the Cattlemen s Beef Board

Assessing Vitamin D Content in US Foods and Supplements. Development of the National Nutrient Database

Chapter 02 Choose A Healthy Diet

Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride withdrawal time on beef carcass cutability and tenderness

Transcription:

1. Who is USDA NDL? Beef Checkoff Funded Nutrient Database Improvement Research Frequently Asked Questions USDA NDL (Nutrient Data Laboratory) is responsible for the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (SR). The SR is the premier nutrient database in the US and is the foundation of most nutrition databases in the US. It is used in the development of food policy, research and monitoring nutrient intake of Americans. Specifically, the nutrient data in SR is often utilized with nationwide food consumption surveys and the results are used to determine program policies and regulatory decisions within the USDA, EPA, FDA, HHS and other government agencies. The impact goes even beyond the United States with many international databases, including those of Canada and Mexico, adopting the nutrient information in SR as the core of their databases. The USDA Food Safety and Information Service (FSIS), the regulatory arm for food safety and labeling policies for meats, recognizes SR as the authoritative source of nutrient content of meat. SR data is also used by research scientists, dietitians, and the public to better plan their diets. With this broad impact, currency of the nutrient composition of beef is of the utmost importance. 2. Why is collecting data for USDA NDL so complex? There are many factors to consider in order to develop a sampling plan that will meet USDA NDL standards. First, NDL requires that the sample population of beef carcasses is the best possible representation of all beef cattle in the U.S. Therefore, beef product is selected to represent the proper proportions of quality grade, yield grade, gender, breed and demographic location in the U.S. Furthermore, utilizing the appropriate number of animals to represent all of these factors is critical in order to produce statistically sound data. As a result, the number of beef samples required to produce accurate and representative nutrition composition data is large. Each sample undergoes tedious dissections and processing in preparation for nutrient analysis. Therefore, a tremendous amount of labor and expertise is required to handle the product. Additionally, nutrient analyses are quite expensive. 3. Can this process be simplified and expedited by collecting individual beef samples and sending to a private lab to generate data? Nutrient data must meet the highest level of research standards to be included in the USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (SR). The USDA National Food and Nutrient Program (NFNAP) establishes study procedures for obtaining, processing, and disseminating data on food composition and nutrient content of foods commonly consumed in the US. The cornerstones for this program reside with sampling and data quality. Sampling strategies are statistically based and provide for selection of products that represent the product mix present in the market place. For beef cuts, this means incorporation of such factors as quality grade, yield grade, marbling scores, gender, and genetics. A sampling limited to a few sources would not likely represent the product mix available to the US public. Preparation of the product

requires standardized protocols for such functions as dissection, weighing, cooking, homogenization, compositing, storage, and shipping. NDL assists cooperating laboratories in establishing those protocols for processing. NDL also establishes requirements for data quality. During the analytical phase, NDL evaluates the various laboratories wishing to conduct these analyses for use of appropriate methodology, and for precision and accuracy through the use of blind duplicates and certified reference materials. Based on the performance of these laboratories for each nutrient of interest, a laboratory may be validated to perform said analyses. In general, multiple laboratories need to be validated in order to have a full complement of nutrients assayed. Once data is received from validated laboratories, the quality control team evaluates both the results from the control materials and from the samples. Data must fall within specified ranges or be repeated. NDL provides continuous monitoring of data and procedures. NDL also tracks changes in products and the market place to maintain currency. Data present in SR are viewed by FSIS as authoritative for use in labeling. As part of the NFNAP process, additional aliquots of samples are archived for possible future use. NDL monitors the state of nutrient research in order to identify emerging nutrients of interest to public health. The archived samples are used to analyze for these nutrients thus expanding the scope of the nutrient content data available well after the original studies have ended. 4. What are the requirements for laboratories producing nutrient data for the SR? NDL evaluates laboratories for use of appropriate methodology and for precision and accuracy through the use of blind duplicates and certified reference materials. Based on the performance of the laboratories for each nutrient of interest, a laboratory may be validated to perform analyses. In general, multiple laboratories need to be validated in order to have a full complement of nutrients assayed. Once data is received from validated laboratories, the quality control team evaluates both the results from the control materials and from the samples. Data must fall within specified ranges or be repeated. NDL provides continuous monitoring of data and procedures. 5. What data will this study produce? This study has been designed to obtain specific beef nutrient data along with the nutrient retention and cooking yields. The following is a complete list of nutrients that will be analyzed. Total fat, moisture, protein and ash Complete fatty acid profile (including long chain fatty acids, omega 3 and 6) CLA Total Cholesterol ICP Minerals Selenium B Vitamins Amino Acids Retinol Choline Vitamin E Vitamin D 2

6. What cuts are currently being analyzed to update or place into the SR? Nutrient data will be collected for beef retail cuts from each primal of the carcass. As of September 2008 the following chuck cuts had been collected and sample preparation for nutrient analysis is ongoing. The next phase of the study will include collection and analysis of the identified cuts from the Beef Rib and Plate. Beef, Brisket, Flat Half, 0 Raw Beef, Chuck, Shoulder Roast, 0, Raw and Cooked Beef, Chuck, Shoulder Steak, 0, Cooked Beef, Chuck, Beef for Stew, 0, Raw and Cooked Denver Cut (Serratus Ventralis Steak), 0, Raw and Cooked Boneless Country Style Beef Ribs, Raw and Cooked America s Beef Roast, Raw and Cooked Chuck Eye Steaks, Raw and Cooked Beef, Chuck, Under Blade Steak, 0, Raw and Cooked Beef, Chuck, Top Blade Steak, Boneless, 0, Raw and Cooked Beef, Chuck, Mock Tender Steak, 0, Raw and Cooked Beef, Chuck, Short Ribs, 0, Raw and Cooked 7. How were the cuts selected to be analyzed? The following factors were used to identify priority beef cuts for analysis: Beef cuts that are included on the FSIS mandatory labeling list were given elevated priority, especially when data for a listed cut is not available or does not represent what is currently sold at retail. Cuts that represent the greatest percentage of beef retail sales were given priority. A beef cut was determined to be high priority when the current data in the database represented a greater fat trim level (ie: ¼ data in SR, but Market Basket Survey showed 0 or 1/8 is actually marketed). Any new Value Added Beef Cut created by Beef Checkoff funded research was given high priority because, in many cases, no data exist for these cuts. As the industry has developed new cutting and marketing technologies to increase the value of beef, some beef cuts are not currently represented in the database. These cuts were given priority status. 8. What benefits will the industry see from this data? This research will allow the most accurate and up to date beef nutrient data to be available in the SR, which will have many positive implications for the Beef Industry. Data in the current SR shows a 20% decrease in beef cut fat content since the early 80 s. Because the fat content of beef has significantly decrease over the past 30 years due to closer trim and reduced internal fat of the carcass, some data in the current SR does not accurately represent the beef cuts that are available in today s market place. The completion of this project will generate data need to more accurately represent Today s lean beef. Making this new data available to the nutrition 3

community will significantly improve the perceived healthfulness of beef and will benefit the industry in the following areas: New and updated data to be used on beef nutrient labels in the meat case, which will provide opportunity for on pack nutrient claims. The most accurate nutrient data for beef cuts that are most often marketed in the retail case. New data will be linked from SR to other nutrient databases used in nutrition monitoring and in nutrition research studies, to allow Beef s best nutrition story to be told. 9. SR 21 Statistics SR 21, released in September 2008, contains nutrient data on 7,412 different food items There are approximately 636 beef cuts and beef products in SR21. Within each beef cut there are variations based on different aspects such as grade level, trim size, components (meaning lean only or lean and fat), raw or cooked and within cooked cuts there can be different cooking methods. For example: Beef, tenderloin i. Beef, tenderloin, 0 or 1/8 ii. Beef, tenderloin, choice, select or all grades iii. Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only or separable lean and fat 1. Separable lean meaning the meat only minus refuse such as bone, fat, connective tissue, etc. Separable lean and fat is the cut put back together; the meat from the cut with the fat added back in. iv. Beef, tenderloin raw v. Beef, tenderloin, cooked, broiled or roasted So after all of these variations are applied, the number of beef items for this cut can increase greatly.* Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only, trimmed to 0 fat, choice, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only, trimmed to 0 fat, select, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only, trimmed to 0 fat, all grades, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8 fat, choice, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8 fat, select, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8 fat, all grades, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0 fat, choice, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0 fat, select, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0 fat, all grades, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8 fat, choice, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8 fat, select, raw Beef, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8 fat, all grades, raw * The same repeated with cooked and each cooking method available. There are more than 130 nutrients in the database. Approximately 67 nutrients are required to be listed for the foods in the SR. This includes two nutrients that will be added soon, Vitamin D (IU) and Vitamin D (mcg). 4

10. What is the projected timeline for the future updates of beef nutrient data? Time* December, 2009 December, 2010 Event Phase IB chuck data complete Phase II Rib and Plate data complete 2011 Phase I data in SR December 2011 Phase III data complete 2012 Phase II data in SR December 2012 Phase IV data complete 2013 Phase III data in SR 2014 Phase IV data in SR *All times are estimates and depend on approval of funding along with other limiting factors (e.g., data completed right before a new SR release will not be published in SR until the next year due to the validations and approvals required before publication) Abbreviation List Acronym SR NFNAP NDL FSIS Resource List Site Descriptor USDA NDL Site Ground Beef Calculator SR 21 Search Beef Research Definition USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference USDA National Food and Nutrient Program USDA s Nutrient Data Laboratory Food Safety and Inspection Service Site Address http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=12 35 45 00 http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgibin/measure.pl?msre_no=23999 http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/ http://www.beefresearch.org/ 5

11. What is the projected timeline for the future updates of beef nutrient data? Time* December, 2009 December, 2010 Event Phase IB chuck data complete Phase II Rib and Plate data complete 2011 Phase I data in SR December 2011 Phase III data complete 2012 Phase II data in SR December 2012 Phase IV data complete 2013 Phase III data in SR 2014 Phase IV data in SR *All times are estimates and depend on approval of funding along with other limiting factors (e.g., data completed right before a new SR release will not be published in SR until the next year due to the validations and approvals required before publication) Abbreviation List Acronym SR NFNAP NDL FSIS Resource List Site Descriptor USDA NDL Site Ground Beef Calculator SR 21 Search Beef Research Definition USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference USDA National Food and Nutrient Program USDA s Nutrient Data Laboratory Food Safety and Inspection Service Site Address http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=12 35 45 00 http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgibin/measure.pl?msre_no=23999 http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/ http://www.beefresearch.org/ 2009 Cattlemen s Beef Board and National Cattlemen s Beef Association 6