IDEXX Summary. Pseudalert was compared to SM 9213E at an independent laboratory that regularly tests pool/spa waters

Similar documents
Biological Consulting Services

MALDI Sepsityper Kit

BACTERIAL EXAMINATION OF WATER

Assessment of the effect of holding time on total coliforms, and E.coli

Media Fill Test Kits. Manufactured by. Making USP <797> compliance easy!

Sulfamethazine Test Kit 20 Tests

Laboratory Certification and Quality Assurance Office Policy on Microbiology Proficiency Testing Policy # WES

Commercial in Confidence

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

A.F. GENITAL SYSTEM. ITEMS NECESSARY BUT NOT INCLUDED IN THE KIT A.F. GENITAL SYSTEM Reagent (ref ) Mycoplasma Transport Broth (ref.

BACTERIAL EXAMINATION OF WATER

Sterility Testing of Peripheral Blood Stem cell (PBSC) harvests in a Tertiary Oncology Setup

EXERCISE. Proteins,Amino Acids, and Enzymes VII: Oxidase Test. Suggested Reading in Textbook. Pronunciation Guide. Materials per Student

Selective Growth Media for Differentiation and Detection of Escherichia Coli and Other Coliforms

Product handbook. Tel.:

Biological Consulting Services of North Florida, Inc.

Nuclear Extraction Kit

Bacterial Survival In Synovial Fluid: Is S. aureus in the Knee Joint Persisting Despite Antibiotic Treatment?

INTRODUCTION PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

In-Use Evaluation Report

Use of Oleic Acid To Reduce the Population of the Bacterial Flora of Poultry Skin

Count. Enterobacteriaceae. Interpretation Guide. 3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Enterobacteriaceae Count Plate

REEF CARE PROGRAM / Reef Colors. Algae Control. Testing and Supplementing

Microbiological Quality of Non-sterile Products Culture Media for Compendial Methods

Hassan Pyar Kok-Khiang Peh *

Vimta Labs Ltd., Life Sciences Facility, Plot No. 5, Alexandria Knowledge Park, Genome Valley, Shameerpet, Hyderabad, Telangana

Draft of Sanitation Standards for General Foods

Laboratory Diagnosis of Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease

Allergen Analysis : Customer Solution Case Studies. ILSI Madrid 2018 Adrian Rogers

Super-Stable colors that pass the test. How Lycored s natural colors perform in beverages and fruit preparations

Graft Delivery Devices

Accreditation No: LAB 003

FECAL ANALYSIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTESTINAL DYSBIOSIS

Comparison of a Waterless, Scrubless CHG/Ethanol Surgical Scrub to Traditional CHG and Povidone-Iodine Surgical Scrubs

Human Neurology 3-Plex A

FIG S1 Replication rates of S. suis strain 10, 10Δsly, and 10cpsΔEF on mono- and virus pre-infected porcine PCLS.

Radiation Inactivation of Microbes in Fresh Vegetables

Serum Amyloid A ELISA

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF

A Nordic standard procedure for detection and enumeration of thermotolerant Campylobacter in foods

Determination of MIC & MBC

Auriga Research Ltd., Vill. Bagbania, The-Nalagarh, Distt-Solan, Himachal Pradesh. Discipline Biological Testing Issue Date

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays INCUCYTE LIVE-CELL ANALYSIS SYSTEM. Real-time automated measurements of cell motility inside your incubator

Microbiology products. Liofilchem Chromatic

NEW. 100% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) gelling fiber dressing

FOOD SAFETY. VIDAS Staph enterotoxin II (SET2) Ultra Performance Summary CONFIDENCE DECIDE WITH

Influence of Calcium Lactatecalcium. and Other Calcium Salts or Mixtures on the Fate of Salmonellae in Artificially Inoculated Orange Juice

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

Public Health Laboratory

Bactisure Wound Lavage. Advancing Biofilm Removal

Method Development and Validation for Nutraceuticals

Survival of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria in

Enhanced microbiological safety of acidified infant formulas tested in vitro

STANDARD FOR PORCINE SEMEN QUALITY IN AI CENTRES

HyServe Compact Dry X-SA Method for the Enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus in Foods NordVal No: 042. HyServe Compact Dry X-SA

Inactivation of pathogenic bacteria in concentrated urine

2013 Clinical drug and alcohol testing solutions. Product Catalog. CLIA-waived point of care test devices

The MALDI Biotyper An In Vitro Diagnostic System (IVD) for Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts with a Global Reach

Practical Aspects of Standardisation for a Global Controls Manufacturer

UPLC/MS Monitoring of Water-Soluble Vitamin Bs in Cell Culture Media in Minutes

Comparison of mechanical disruption techniques for the rapid inactivation of

In-vitro antimicrobial evaluation of Endodontic cavity sealers against Enterococcus faecalis

Stability of Cefazolin Sodium Eye Drops

Fructose-6-Phosphate Colorimetric Assay Kit

Choline Assay Kit (Fluorometric)

IV2-113E Use by. Invitron Glargine ELISA Kit REF LOT IVD. Definitions. English. For in-vitro diagnostic use. Instructions for use.

Rapid Alcohol Screening Devices. p19

Nuclear Extraction Kit

Research Article. The effects of hyaluronic acid on the morphological physiological differentiation of Lactobacillus

1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

320 MBIO Microbial Diagnosis. Aljawharah F. Alabbad Noorah A. Alkubaisi 2017

CHAPTER 8 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF THE CRUDE ETHANOLIC EXTRACT AND THE ISOLATED COMPOUNDS FROM THE STEM OF COSTUS IGNEUS

Legionella pneumophila SG1 Kit for the CellStream

Interpretation Guide. Enterobacteriaceae Count Plate

Supplementary Figure S1 Black silicon and dragonfly wing nanotopography.

Beta Hexosaminidase Activity Assay Kit

Evaluation of a Waterless, Scrubless Chlorhexidine Gluconate/Ethanol Surgical Scrub for Antimicrobial Efficacy

Food Division Chain of Custody LA Testing Order Number (Lab Use Only):

Methods for colistin testing What works and what does not? Erika Matuschek, Ph D EUCAST Development Laboratory, EDL

Mouse C3 (Complement Factor 3) ELISA Kit

A new selective blood agar medium for Streptococcus pyogenes and other haemolytic streptococci

Designing of Culture Media for Increased Recovery of Total Heterotrophs From Water Samples

P. A. AKPAN AND J. T. ABRAHAM

Changes in the Microflora of Bovine Colostrum During Natural Fermentation

EFFECTS OF ALETA IN PROMOTING THE GROWTH OF PROBIOTIC BACTERIA: IN VITRO STUDY

Supplementary Figure 1. Tamoxifen does not promote chemotaxis or chemokinesis in the absence of additional stimulation. Transwell chemotaxis assays

RAPID REDUCTION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS POPULATIONS ON STAINLESS STEEL SURFACES BY ZEOLITE CERAMIC COATINGS CONTAINING SILVER AND ZINC IONS

AN IMMUNOASSAY TEST FOR THE QUALITATIVE DETECTION OF STREP A ANTIGEN IN THROAT SWAB SPECIMENS

Policy Title: Single-Use (Disposable) Devices Policy Number: 13. Effective Date: 6/10/2013 Review Date: 6/10/2016

Selective enrichment of following microorganism Media Positive test organism Page

Mammalian Membrane Protein Extraction Kit

GLP-2 (Rat) ELISA. For the quantitative determination of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) in rat serum and plasma

Seven Essences Necessary for Experts at Risk Communication

Lipid Droplets Fluorescence Assay Kit

Lactase CONTROL+ Biohit Oyj INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. Control Solution for Lactose Intolerance Quick Test. Innovating for Health

BD BBL CHROMagar Staph aureus

Impact of Sodium Reduction on Survival of Listeria monocytogenes in Sliced Process Cheese

INSTANT-VIEW H. pylori Rapid Test CLIA WAIVED Test for Whole Blood QUALITATIVE IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR EXTERNAL USE ONLY

Effect of ph changes in cerebrospinal fluid specimens on bacterial survival and antigen test

Transcription:

IDEXX Summary 14A Topic: Title: Author: Beta Trial Study report comparing Pseudalert* versus Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1 (SM 9213E) in pool/spa waters for detection and enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX Pseudalert test against SM 9213E at recovering confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa from pool/spa water samples IDEXX Laboratories Date: October, 2010 Report Highlights: Pseudalert was compared to SM 9213E at an independent laboratory that regularly tests pool/spa waters Over 1,000 pool/spa samples were tested for P. aeruginosa using Pseudalert and SM 9213E Data from the completed study showed: o Pseudalert has comparable detection (p = 1.0) and quantification of P. aeruginosa versus SM 9213E. Two methods are comparable if p> 0.05. o Pseudalert accurately recovered very low concentrations of P. aeruginosa (as low as 1 cfu/100ml of sample) o Very high background flora (> 57,000 cfu/ml) did not interfere with the ability of Pseudalert to accurately detect and enumerate P. aeruginosa Pseudalert performed as well as SM 9213E for detection and quantification of P. aeruginosa in pool/spa water samples *Pseudalert and Quanti-Tray are trademarks or registered trademarks of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and/or other countries. 1. APHA, AWWA, and WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation). 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21 st ed. New York: APHA.

Technical Note Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX Pseudalert* test versus Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1 (SM 9213E) at recovering confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa from pool/spa water samples Product Description The Pseudalert test detects the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bottled, pool, and spa water samples. The test is based on a bacterial enzyme detection technology that signals the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through the hydrolysis of a substrate present in the Pseudalert reagent. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells rapidly grow and reproduce using the rich supply of amino acids, vitamins, and other nutrients present in the Pseudalert reagent. Actively growing strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have an enzyme that cleaves the substrate to produce a blue fluorescence under UV light. Pseudalert detects Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 cfu in either 100 ml or 250 ml samples within 24 hours for non-carbonated water samples and within 26 hours for carbonated samples. Scope This technical note contains data collected at an independent certified laboratory that evaluated the performance of the Pseudalert test prior to its launch in September 2010. The test matrix for this study was pool/spa water, samples of which were collected at numerous locations as part of the laboratory s normal testing operation. The microorganisms present in these pool/spa water samples were from wild populations that occurred naturally in the environment and did not result from supplemental spiking activities. Testing occurred over the course of seven months and involved 1,008 separate pool/spa water samples. This study compared the relative recovery of confirmed P. aeruginosa by Pseudalert after 24 hours of incubation against the SM 9213E.

Procedure 1. Samples were collected at numerous locations as 2 x 200 ml aliquots from pool/spa sites maintained at > 30ºC. 2. When the samples arrived at the laboratory, composites were prepared by combining and thoroughly mixing the two samples from each collection site. 3. A 100 ml aliquot of each sample was processed and analyzed following the procedures outlined in the SM 9213E. 4. A 100 ml aliquot of each sample was processed and analyzed following the procedures outlined in the Pseudalert package insert for 100 ml quantification using the Quanti-Tray* device. Pseudalert was incubated for 24 hours at 38±0.5ºC. 5. The Heterotrophic Plate Count of each sample was determined following the procedure outlined in the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 20 th Edition 1 (SM 9215C) 6. Presumptive P. aeruginosa positive samples from both methods were confirmed by assaying the following reactions (which are enhancements from SM 9213E): Oxidase Arginine decarboxylase 2 Growth on Centrimide agar 3 Growth in Tryptic Soy Broth incubated at 41.5ºC 7. Random negative samples were also subjected to confirmation procedures.

Results Twenty samples of the original 1,008 pool/spa water samples tested contained confirmed P. aeruginosa by at least one of the test methods. The relative recovery of P. aeruginosa by each method is summarized in the chart below: Month Sample Pseudalert SM 9213 HPC Confirmation Tested No. (MPN/100mL) (cfu/100ml) (cfu/ml) 1 9 4 P.aeruginosa 40 March 2 2 2 P.aeruginosa <10 3 >201 >100 P.aeruginosa 10260 (est) 4 6 3 P.aeruginosa 10 5 201 >100 P.aeruginosa 80 April 6 >201 >100 P.aeruginosa >57000 (est) 7 >201 >100 P.aeruginosa >57000 est 8 6 >100 P.aeruginosa 60 9 0 1 P.aeruginosa <10 May 10 5 1 P.aeruginosa <10 11 5 3 P.aeruginosa 40 12 74 34 P.aeruginosa 80 13 101 >100 P.aeruginosa <10 June 14 >201 >100 P.aeruginosa >57,000 est 15 4 12 P.aeruginosa 320 July 16 1 0 P.aeruginosa <10 17 0 1 P.aeruginosa 10 18 6 2 P.aeruginosa 10 August 19 34 27 P.aeruginosa >57000 20 22 27 P.aeruginosa >57000 The presence or absence of confirmed P. aeruginosa by each method was compared statistically using the McNemar test for matched paired samples. The results of this analysis are shown below (Note both methods had one sample that yielded a presumptive positive result for P. aeruginosa that could not be confirmed): Only samples containing confirmed P. aeruginosa All Samples mpac SM 9213E + - mpac SM 9213E + - Pseudalert + - 17 1 2 0 Pseudalert + - 17 2 3 986 p = 1.0 p = 1.0

Conclusions The data presented above clearly demonstrates the comparable detection (p>0.05) and quantification of P. aeruginosa by the Pseudalert method compared to the standard method. Pseudalert was able to accurately recover very low concentrations of P. aeruginosa (as low as 1 cfu/100ml of sample) without interference from the heterotrophic bacterial populations or chemical residues present in the pool/spa water samples. Even the presence of very high bacterial populations (in excess of 57,000 cfu/ml) did not interfere with the ability of Pseudalert to accurately detect and quantify the presence of P. aeruginosa. Both methods produced one test that was presumptively positive for the presence of P. aeruginosa but failed to be confirmed. The bacterial isolate that produced this result in Pseudalert was reintroduced into the test but failed to reproduce the positive response. Based on these data we conclude that, after 24 hours of incubation, Pseudalert performs as well as the SM 9213E at the specific detection and quantification of P. aeruginosa from pool/spa water matrices. For technical questions, please contact: IDEXX Laboratories Technical Support 1 IDEXX Drive Westbrook, ME 04092 207-556-4496 / 1-800-321-0207 www.idexx.com/water Pseudalert Quick Reference Guide About IDEXX Laboratories IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. is the global market leader in diagnostics and information technology solutions for animal health and water and milk quality. Headquartered in Maine, IDEXX employs over 4,700 people in more than 60 locations around the world. IDEXX is the world leader in microbiology testing technologies that ensure safe water. As the world's preferred provider of innovative drinking-water microbiology test kits, IDEXX is known for its breakthrough products. We provide easy, rapid, accurate and cost-effective watertesting solutions. Our sales, customer service and technical support teams serve customers in over 75 countries and our products have governmental approval in 36 countries world-wide. References 1. APHA, AWWA, and WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation). 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21 st ed. New York: APHA.

2. McFaddin, J.F. Biochemical Tests for Identification of Medical Bacteria. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000. p.120. 3. Zimbro, Mary Jo and David A. Power, eds. Difco and BBL Manual. Sparks: Becton, Dickinson and Company, 2005. p.135. *Pseudalert and Quanti-Tray are trademarks or registered trademarks of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and/or other countries.