Hypertension Guidelines: Are We Pressured to Change? Oregon Cardiovascular Symposium Portland, Oregon June 6, Financial Disclosures

Similar documents
New Recommendations for the Treatment of Hypertension: From Population Salt Reduction to Personalized Treatment Targets

DISCLOSURE PHARMACIST OBJECTIVES 9/30/2014 JNC 8: A REVIEW OF THE LONG-AWAITED/MUCH-ANTICIPATED HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES. I have nothing to disclose.

The Latest Generation of Clinical

Objectives. Describe results and implications of recent landmark hypertension trials

JNC 8 -Controversies. Sagren Naidoo Nephrologist CMJAH

Diabetes and Hypertension

HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES WHERE ARE WE IN 2014

Treating Hypertension in Individuals with Diabetes

Hypertension Management: A Moving Target

Managing Hypertension in 2016

Hypertension Update Clinical Controversies Regarding Age and Race

APPENDIX D: PHARMACOTYHERAPY EVIDENCE

JNC Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

Preventing and Treating High Blood Pressure

Modern Management of Hypertension

2014 HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES

Understanding the importance of blood pressure control An overview of new guidelines: How do they impact daily current management?

ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 36(1), January February 2016; Article No. 06, Pages: JNC 8 versus JNC 7 Understanding the Evidences

Hypertension Update 2009

Modern Management of Hypertension: Where Do We Draw the Line?

ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

ALLHAT. ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic & Fasting Glucose Status

Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

ALLHAT Role of Diuretics in the Prevention of Heart Failure - The Antihypertensive and Lipid- Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial

MODERN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION Where Do We Draw the Line? Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Blood Pressure and Risk

Clinical Updates in the Treatment of Hypertension JNC 7 vs. JNC 8. Lauren Thomas, PharmD PGY1 Pharmacy Practice Resident South Pointe Hospital

ALLHAT. Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic

New Lipid Guidelines. PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN: Implications of the New Guidelines for Hypertension and Lipids.

Objective & Outline. How the JNC Process Has Evolved. Expertise Represented on JNC 8 Panel

MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION: TREATMENT THRESHOLDS AND MEDICATION SELECTION

Hypertension (JNC-8)

Managing Hypertension in Diabetes Sean Stewart, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CLS Internal Medicine Park Nicollet Clinic St Louis Park.

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

ABSTRACT. Special Communication February 5, 2014

Update in Hypertension

Hypertension. Does it Matter What Medications We Use? Nishant K. Sekaran, M.D. M.Sc. Intermountain Heart Institute

2/10/2014. Hypertension: Highlights of Hypertension Guidelines: Making the Most of Limited Evidence. Issues with contemporary guidelines

Supplementary Online Content

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

Hypertension and Diabetes Should we be SPRINTING or Reaching an ACCORD?

JNC-8. (Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure- 8) An Update on Hypertension Guidelines

Challenges in Hypertension: Incorporating Evolving Clinical Data Into Practice

Management of Hypertension

Randomized Design of ALLHAT BP Trial

Treating Hypertension in 2018: What Makes the Most Sense Today?

Management of Lipid Disorders and Hypertension: Implications of the New Guidelines

Evolving Concepts on Hypertension: Implications of Three Guidelines (JNC 8 Panel, ESH/ESC, NICE/BSH)

Outcomes and Perspectives of Single-Pill Combination Therapy for the modern management of hypertension

Hypertension JNC 8 (2014)

Combination Therapy for Hypertension

Hypertension Pharmacotherapy: A Practical Approach

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Jackson T. Wright, Jr. MD, PhD

We are delighted to have Dr. Roetzheim with us today to discuss Managing Hypertension in Older Adult Patients.

Hypertension Management Controversies in the Elderly Patient

Difficult to Treat Hypertension

Blood Pressure Targets: Where are We Now?

Hypertension in 2015: SPRINT-ing ahead of JNC-8. MAJ Charles Magee, MD MPH FACP Director, WRNMMC Hypertension Clinic

STANDARD treatment algorithm mmHg

Hypertension 2015: Recent Evidence that Will Change Your Practice

Difficult-to-Control & Resistant Hypertension. Anthony Viera, MD, MPH, FAHA Professor and Chair

None. Disclosure: Relationships with Industry Conflicts of Interests. Learning Objectives: Participants will be able to:

Objectives. JNC 7 Is Nice But What s Up With JNC 8? Why Do We Care? Hypertension Background: Prevalence

DISCLOSURES OUTLINE OUTLINE 9/29/2014 ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

Clinical Review & Education. Special Communication

Masked Hypertension. Why Should We Care? Dr. Peter J. Lin Director Primary Care Initiatives - Canadian Heart Research Centre

Cedars Sinai Diabetes. Michael A. Weber

Jared Moore, MD, FACP

Reframe the Paradigm of Hypertension treatment Focus on Diabetes

Renal Denervation. by Walead Latif, DO, MBA, CPE Assistant Clinical Professor Rutgers Medical School

Hypertension Controversies: SPRINTing to New Goals

Talking about blood pressure

New Hypertension Guidelines: Why the change? Neil Brummond, M.D. Avera Medical Group Internal Medicine Sioux Falls, SD

HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT IN ELDERLY POPULATIONS

How clinically important are the results of the large trials in hypertension?

Update in Cardiology Pharmacologic Management of Cardiovascular Risk. Christopher C. Roe, MSN, ACNP

Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

Management of Hypertension for Stroke Prevention in New Zealand: Can We Do Better? Walter van der Merwe Nephrologist Waitemata DHB

The JNC 8 Guidelines: A Clinical Review

Management of Hypertension in Women

Pre-ALLHAT Drug Use. Diuretics. ß-Blockers. ACE Inhibitors. CCBs. Year. % of Treated Patients on Medication. CCBs. Beta Blockers.

Hypertension in the Era of ACC/AHA: Practice Changing Evidence and Recommendations

7/7/ CHD/MI LVH and LV dysfunction Dysrrhythmias Stroke PVD Renal insufficiency and failure Retinopathy. Normal <120 Prehypertension

By Prof. Khaled El-Rabat

Blood Pressure Targets in Diabetes

What in the World is Functional Medicine?

Conflicts of Interest. Hypertension Guidelines Have Your Blood Pressure Up? Learning Objectives-Technician. Learning Objectives-Pharmacist

Hypertension Guidelines Michael A. Weber, MD Division of Cardiovascular Medicine State University of New York Downstate Medical Center

4/4/17 HYPERTENSION TARGETS: WHAT DO WE DO NOW? SET THE STAGE BP IN CLINICAL TRIALS?

Hypertension Canada CHEP Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. What s new in the treatment of hypertension? What s still really important?

Hypertension targets: sorting out the confusion. Brian Rayner, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town

Prevention of Heart Failure: What s New with Hypertension

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

HypertensionTreatment Guidelines. Michaelene Urban APRN, MSN, ACNS-BC, ANP-BC

Hypertension and the SPRINT Trial: Is Lower Better

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension - Pocket Guide Update 2004 Revision July 2005

Managing Hypertension in 2018

Blood pressure treatment target in diabetes. Should it be <130 mmhg?

Transcription:

Hypertension Guidelines: Are We Pressured to Change? Oregon Cardiovascular Symposium Portland, Oregon June 6, 2015 William C. Cushman, MD Professor, Preventive Medicine, Medicine, and Physiology University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis, Tennessee Financial Disclosures I have no financial relationships with any commercial interests relevant to this presentation James, et al. JAMA. 2014 ;311:507-20 1

This 2014 HTN evidence-based guideline focuses on the panel s 3 highest ranked questions related to HTN management 1. In adults with HTN, does initiating antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy at specific BP thresholds improve health outcomes? 2. In adults with HTN, does treatment with antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy to a specified BP goal lead to improvements in health outcomes? 3. In adults with HTN, do various antihypertensive drugs or drug classes differ in comparative benefits and harms on specific health outcomes? This 2014 HTN evidence-based guideline focuses on the panel s 3 highest ranked questions related to HTN management 1. In adults with HTN, does initiating antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy at specific BP thresholds improve health outcomes? 2. In adults with HTN, does treatment with antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy to a specified BP goal lead to improvements in health outcomes? 3. In adults with HTN, do various antihypertensive drugs or drug classes differ in comparative benefits and harms on specific health outcomes? Thresholds After reviewing the evidence, the JNC 8 panel decided that, although some trials had higher thresholds for eligibility than the goals tested, translation into practice should make the threshold for initiating antihypertensive treatment the same as the BP treatment goal. 2

This 2014 HTN evidence-based guideline focuses on the panel s 3 highest ranked questions related to HTN management 1. In adults with HTN, does initiating antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy at specific BP thresholds improve health outcomes? 2. In adults with HTN, does treatment with antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy to a specified BP goal lead to improvements in health outcomes? 3. In adults with HTN, do various antihypertensive drugs or drug classes differ in comparative benefits and harms on specific health outcomes? VA Cooperative Morbidity Trial in Hypertension 67% RR 96% RR Stopped after 3.3 yrs Stopped after 1.5 years (N = 143) (N = 380) Blood pressure (BP) goal: DBP <90 mm Hg. Therapy: HCTZ + reserpine + hydralazine. NNT = 2.7 for both. RR = risk reduction. JAMA.1967;202(11):1028-1034. JAMA. 1970;213(7): 1143-1152. Diastolic BP Goal Trials Several trials used DBP goal ~90 mm Hg and demonstrated consistent reduction of CVD events VA Cooperative Study -Entry: DBP 90-129 mm Hg -Goal: DBP <90 mm Hg Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP) -Entry: DBP 90 mm Hg -Goal: DBP 90 mm Hg and at least 10 mm Hg Australian National Blood Pressure (ANBP) Trial -Entry: DBP 95 to <110 mm Hg -Goal: DBP 90 mm Hg initially, then after 1 year, lowered to 80 mm Hg STOP-Hypertension Trial -Entry: SBP 180-230 mm Hg + DBP 90 mm Hg, or DBP 105-120 mm Hg irrespective of SBP -Goal: BP <160/95 mm Hg 9 3

Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Trial Events by Target DBP Groups* Number of events 270 240 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 DBP Target: 90 85 80 N =18,790 0 Major All cardiovascular myocardial events Infarction All stroke Cardiovascular Mortality *The outcomes for different BP groups were not statistically significant Total Mortality Hansson L, et al. Lancet. 1998;351:1755 1762. Major Randomized Trials Testing SBP Goals in General (Older) Populations SHEP Syst-Eur HYVET JATOS VALISH Age >60 >60 >80 65-85 70-84 Number 4,736 4,695 3,845 4,418 3,260 Entry SBP 160-219 160-219 160-199 >160 >160 Goal SBP <148 <150 <150 <140 <140 Achieved SBP 142 151 144 136 137 Stroke 36% 42% ns ns ns CVD 32% 31% 34% ns ns Mortality ns ns 21% ns ns SBP = systolic blood pressure; CVD = cardiovascular disease Recommendation 1 In the general population 60 years of age, initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower BP at SBP 150 mm Hg or DBP 90 mm Hg and treat to a goal SBP <150 mm Hg and goal DBP <90 mm Hg. Strong Recommendation Grade A Corollary Recommendation: In the general population 60 years of age, if pharmacological treatment for high BP results in lower achieved SBPs (for example, <140 mm Hg) and treatment is not associated with adverse effects on health or quality of life, treatment does not need to be adjusted. Expert Opinion Grade E 4

2014 Eighth Joint National Committee Panel Recommendation For Blood Pressure Targets Revisited: Results From The INVEST Study Bangalore, et al. JACC 2014;64:784-93 Recommendation 2 In the general population <60 years of age, initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower BP at DBP 90 mm Hg and treat to a goal DBP <90 mm Hg. For ages 30-59 years, Strong Recommendation Grade A For ages 18-29 years, Expert Opinion Grade E Recommendation 3 In the general population <60 years of age, initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower BP at SBP 140 mm Hg and treat to a goal SBP <140 mm Hg. Expert Opinion Grade E BP Targets in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) 3 RCTs (8 reports), total of 2272 participants: MDRD(Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study AASK(African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension) Trial REIN-2(Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy 2) trial No conclusive evidence favoring a BP target of <125/75 to 130/80 mm Hg rather than <140/90 mm Hg. Upadhyay A, et al (Tufts). Annals Intern Med 2011 5

Recommendation 4 In the population 18 years of age with CKD, initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower BP at SBP 140 mm Hg or DBP 90 mm Hg and treat to goal SBP <140 mm Hg and goal DBP <90 mm Hg. Expert Opinion Grade E James, et al. JAMA. 2014 ;311:507-20 Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial SPRINT (NHLBI) To test whether SBP goal <120 mm Hg reduces CVD events compared with SBP goal <140 mm Hg in nondiabetic high CVD risk population: Primary outcome: composite of MI, stroke, HF, ACS, CV death. Other outcomes: renal, cognition/dementia, MRI changes. Known CVD, stage 3 CKD, and combinations of risk factors or other indications for high risk; enriched with seniors ( 75 years old) SBP 130-180 mm Hg on 0-3 medications (depending on level of SBP). Completed enrollment of 9,361 participants in March 2013. 4-6 years follow-up (2016). RCTs Testing BP Goals In Hypertensive Diabetic Patients Trial n Duration (years) SBP goal, mmhg DBP goal, mmhg Mean BP, less intense, mmhg Mean BP, more intense, mmhg SHEP 583 5 <148 none 155/72 146/68 Outcome Risk Reduction Stroke 22% (ns) CVD 34% CHD 56% Syst-Eur 492 2 <150 none 162/82 153/78 HOT 1,501 3 none <80 148/85 144/81 UKPDS 1,148 8.4 <150 <85 154/87 144/82 ABCD 470 5.3 none <75 138/86 132/78 ACCORD 4,733 4.7 <120 none 134 119 Stroke 69% CVD 62% CVD 51% MI 50% Stroke 30% (ns) CV death 67% DM-related 34% deaths 32% Stroke 44% Microvasc 37% Renal (1º) nc Microvasc nc Death 49% CVD ns CVD (1º) 12% (ns) Stroke 41% Ferrannini, Cushman. Lancet 2012;380:601-10. 6

ADVANCE BP Trial 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to addition of indapamide + perindopril vs PBO on usual therapy. Significant 14% reduction in mortality (stopped early) and 9% reduction of combined macro- and microvascular outcomes, but neither significant alone. Mean SBP in intensive group was 135 mm Hg, similar to mean SBP in ACCORD standard BP group. Patel, et al. Lancet 2007;370:829-840 Recommendation 5 In the population 18 years of age with diabetes, initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower BP at SBP 140 mm Hg or DBP 90 mm Hg and treat to a goal SBP <140 mm Hg and goal DBP <90 mm Hg. (Expert Opinion Grade E) BP Targets/Goals: Summary Best evidence from trials: <150/90 Most current guidelines recommend: <140/90 for most patients Consensus for age 80 years: <150/90 JNC 8/?ESH/ESC: 60/65 years: <150/90 <140/90 OK, if tolerated DM: <140/80-85-90 CKD: <140/90 (some: <130/80 if proteinuria) Other populations: insufficient evidence or included in these recommendations 7

This 2014 HTN evidence-based guideline focuses on the panel s 3 highest ranked questions related to HTN management 1. In adults with HTN, does initiating antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy at specific BP thresholds improve health outcomes? 2. In adults with HTN, does treatment with antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy to a specified BP goal lead to improvements in health outcomes? 3. In adults with HTN, do various antihypertensive drugs or drug classes differ in comparative benefits and harms on specific health outcomes? Network Meta-analysis of Antihypertensive Drugs Low-dose Diuretics* versus Placebo Outcome RR 95% CI P CHD 0.79 0.69-0.92 0.002 Heart failure 0.51 0.42-0.62 <0.001 Stroke 0.71 0.63-0.81 <0.001 CVD events 0.76 0.69-0.83 <0.001 CVD mortality 0.81 0.73-0.92 0.001 Total mortality 0.90 0.84-0.96 0.002 * Low-dose Diuretics (examples): HCTZ 25-50 mg/d chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg/d 0.40 0.65 0.90 1.15 1.40 Low-dose diuretics better Low-dose diuretics worse Psaty, et al. JAMA 2003; 289:2534 Proportion of patients with first event (%) 16 14 12 10 LIFE Study Primary Composite Endpoint* Intention-to-treat 8 6 4 2 Adjusted risk reduction 13 0%, P=0 021 Unadjusted risk reduction 14 6%, P=0 009 Atenolol Losartan * CV mortality, MI, and stroke Study Month 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 Losartan (n)46054524 4460 4392 4312 4247 4189 4112 4047 3897 1889 901 Atenolol (n)45884494 4414 4349 4289 4205 4135 4066 3992 3821 1854 876 Dahlof B, et al. Lancet. 2002;359:995-1003. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Science. www.hypertensiononline.org 8

ALLHAT Hypertension Trial 42,418 high-risk hypertensive patients 90% previously treated 10% untreated STEP 1 AGENTS (Double-blind) Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg Amlodipine 2.5-10 mg Lisinopril 10-40 mg Doxazosin 1-8 mg N=15,255 N=9,048 N=9,054 N=9,061 Blinded drugs titrated and atenolol, clonidine, reserpine, and/or hydralazine added as needed to achieve BP goal: <140/90 mm Hg ALLHAT CHD Final Outcomes Results Doxazosin vs. Chlorthalidone Relative Risk and 95% Confidence Intervals 1.03 (0.92-1.15) All-Cause Mortality Combined CHD Stroke Heart Failure 1.03 (0.94-1.13) 1.07 (0.99-1.16) 1.26 (1.10-1.46) 1.80 (1.61-2.02) Combined CVD, p< 0.0001 1.20 (1.13-1.27) 0.50 1 2 3 Favors Doxazosin Favors Chlorthalidone Hypertension 2003;42:239-246 27 ALLHAT Major Outcomes Relative Risks and 95% Confidence Intervals Amlodipine/Chlorthalidone CHD 0.98 (0.90-1.07) All-Cause Mortality 0.96 (0.89-1.02) Stroke 0.93 (0.82-1.06) Combined CVD 1.04 (0.99-1.09) Heart Failure 1.38 (1.25-1.52) Lisinopril/Chlorthalidone 0.99 (0.91-1.08) 1.00 (0.94-1.08) 1.15 (1.02-1.30) 1.10 (1.05-1.16) 1.19 (1.07-1.31) ESRD 1.12 (0.89-1.40) 1.11 (0.88-1.38) 0.50 1 2 0.50 1 2 Favors Amlodipine Favors Chlorthalidone Favors Lisinopril Favors Chlorthalidone JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997 9

ALLHAT Only Subgroup Differences: Lisinopril vs Chlorthalidone in Blacks/Non-Blacks for CVD & Stroke Blacks Non-Blacks CHD Mortality Combined CVD Stroke Heart Failure ESRD 1.10 (0.94-1.28) 1.06 (0.95-1.18) 1.19 (1.09-1.30) 1.40 (1.17-1.68) 1.32 (1.11-1.58) 1.29 (0.94-1.75) 0.94 (0.85-1.05) 0.97 (0.89-1.06) 1.06 (1.00-1.13) 1.00 (0.85-1.17) 1.15 (1.01-1.30) 0.93 (0.67-1.30) 0.50 1 2 Favors Favors Lisinopril Chlorthalidone 0.50 1 2 Favors Favors Lisinopril Chlorthalidone Recommendation 6 In the general non-black population, including those with diabetes, initial antihypertensive treatment should include a thiazide-type diuretic, CCB, ACEI or ARB. Moderate Recommendation Grade B Drug Considerations Each of the 4 drug classes recommended by the panel yielded comparable effects on overall mortality and CV, cerebrovascular, and kidney outcomes, with one exception: HF. Initial treatment with a thiazide-type diuretic was more effective than a CCB or ACEI, and an ACEI was more effective than a CCB in improving HF outcomes. While the panel recognized that improved HF outcomes was an important finding that should be considered when selecting a drug for initial therapy for HTN, the panel did not conclude that it was compelling enough within the context of the overall body of evidence to preclude the use of the other drug classes for initial therapy. 10

Diuretics Used to Treat Hypertension Thiazide and Thiazide-like Diuretics Loop Diuretics Potassium-Sparing Diuretics BA (%) T ½ (hours) DOA (hours) Hydrochlorothiazide 65 75 3.0 10.0 6 12 Chlorothiazide 30 50 15.0 25.0 6 12 Chlorthalidone 65 24.0 55.0 24 72 Bendroflumethiazide 90 2.5 5.0 18 24 Indapamide 90 6.0 15.0 24 36 Metolazone 65 14 12 24 Bumetanide 80 90 0.3 1.5 4-6 Furosemide 10 100 0.3 3.4 6-8 Torsemide 80 100 3.0 4.0 6-8 Amiloride 15-20 17.0 26.0 24 Triamterene 83 (55) * 3.0 (3.0) * 7-9 Spironolactone >90 1.5 15.0 48-72 Eplerenone 69 2.2 9.4 NA *Parentheses denote active metabolite. The half-life of one active metabolite, potassium canrenoate, is 15 h. BA = bioavailability; T½ = half-life; DOA = duration of action: NA = unknown. Reprinted from Brater DC. In: Principles of Pharmacology: Based Concepts and Clinical Applications. 1995:657-672, with permission from Springer Science and Business Media; Delyani JA, et al. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2001;19:185-200; Rosenberg J, et al. Cardiovasc Drug Ther. 2005;19:301-306; Sica DA. Congest Heart Fail. 2003;9:100-105. Recommendation 7 In the general Black population, including those with diabetes, initial antihypertensive treatment should include a thiazide-type diuretic or CCB. For general Black population: Moderate Recommendation Grade B For Blacks with diabetes: Weak Recommendation Grade C Recommendation 8 In the population 18 years of age with CKD and HTN, initial (or add-on) antihypertensive treatment should include an ACEI or ARB to improve kidney outcomes. This applies to all CKD patients with HTN regardless of race or diabetes status. Moderate Recommendation Grade B 11

ALLHAT Cumulative Percent Controlled (BP <140/90 mm Hg) at Five Years 80 66 Percent 60 40 26 49 20 0 1 1 or 2 Any Number of Prescribed Drugs Derived from Cushman et al. J Clin Hypertens. 2002;4:393-404. Recommendation 9 The main objective of HTN treatment is to attain and maintain goal BP. If goal BP is not reached within a month of treatment, increase the dose of the initial drug or add a 2 nd drug from one of the classes in Recommendation 6 (thiazide-type diuretic, CCB, ACEI or ARB). Continue to assess BP and adjust the treatment regimen until goal BP is reached. If goal BP cannot be reached with 2 drugs, add and titrate a 3 rd drug from the list provided. Do not use an ACEI and an ARB together in the same patient. Initial Choices of Medications Diuretics Diuretics or CCBs in Blacks β-blockers should be included in the regimen if there is a compelling indication for a β-blocker ACE inhibitors or ARBs* Calcium antagonists * Recommended for CKD Combining ACEI with ARB discouraged 12

Recommendation 9, cont If goal BP cannot be reached using the drugs in Recommendation 6 because of a contraindication or the need to use more than 3 drugs to reach goal BP, antihypertensive drugs from other classes can be used. Referral to a hypertension specialist may be indicated for patients in whom goal BP cannot be attained using the above strategy or for the management of complicated patients where additional clinical consultation is needed. Expert Opinion Grade E From the 2014 U.S. Hypertension Guidelines by the JNC 8 Panel James, et al. JAMA. 2014 ;311:507-20 JNC 8 Panel option C (Expert Opinion): Begin with 2 drugs at the same time, either as 2 separate pills or as a single pill combination Initiate therapy with 2 drugs simultaneously, either as 2 separate drugs or as a single pill combination. Some committee members recommend starting therapy with 2 drugs when SBP is >160 mm Hg and/or DBP is >100 mm Hg, or if SBP is >20 mm Hg above goal and/or DBP is >10 mm Hg above goal. If goal BP is not achieved with 2 drugs, select a third drug from the list (thiazide-type diuretic, CCB, ACEI, or ARB), avoiding the combined use of ACEI and ARB. Titrate the third drug up to the maximum recommended dose. James, et al. JAMA. 2014 ;311:507-20 13

Drugs to Add to Initial 2-3 Drug Combinations spironolactone or amiloride: especially if K + low or 1 aldosteronism. reserpine: best choice of adrenergic inhibitor, well tolerated, very long duration of action alpha blocker: especially if LUTS alternative CCB: don t combine non-dhp c BB beta-blocker: safe to combine (except c non- DHP CCB), but doesn t add much efficacy. vasodilator: hydralazine or minoxidil alpha-beta blocker: labetolol or carvedilol central agonist: most side effects frequency JNC 2014 Report The JNC 2014 report addresses whether pharmacologic treatment of hypertension at particular BP thresholds, and to particular BP goals, or with particular antihypertensive drug(s)/drug classes improves important health outcomes, including mortality (overall and CVD), myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization, heart failure, stroke, peripheral revascularization and progression of CKD compared to other thresholds, goals, or treatment regimens. Thank you! 14