Social Competence Scale Parent Version Grade 1 /Year 2. Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne Corrigan December 29, 2002

Similar documents
Neighborhood Questionnaire Grade 11 /Year 12. Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne Corrigan April 24, 2003

Things That Happen to Me Grade 3 /Year 4. Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne Corrigan March 8, 2003

ADHD Checklist Teacher Version Grade 1/Year 2 Fast Track Project Technical Report Cynthia Rains May 6, 2005

Child Problem Behavior Checklist Kindergarten/Year 1 Fast Track Project Technical Report Cynthia Rains May 12, 2006

Disciplinary Actions Grade 9 /Year 10. Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne Corrigan May 15, 2003

Normative Beliefs about Aggression Grade 5/Year 6 Fast Track Project Technical Report Cynthia Rains March 27, 2003

Levenson Psychopathy Inventory Grad 12 /Year 13 Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne-Marie Iselin and Richard L. Lamb 02/2010

Teacher s Report Form Kindergarten/Year 1 Fast Track Project Technical Report Cynthia Rains November 26, 2003

Design and Preliminary Validation of an Instrument to Measure Medical Student Attitudes Toward the Homeless

VALIDATION OF TWO BODY IMAGE MEASURES FOR MEN AND WOMEN. Shayna A. Rusticus Anita M. Hubley University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

CHAPTER 3. Research Methodology

This material should not be used for any other purpose without the permission of the author. Contact details:

Observations and ratings of preschool children s social behavior: Issues of representativeness and validity

Validity and reliability of a 36-item problemrelated distress screening tool in a community sample of 319 cancer survivors

Preliminary Reliability and Validity Report

Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire

Test Partnership TPAQ Series Psychometric Properties

Developmental Assessment of Young Children Second Edition (DAYC-2) Summary Report

EFFECTIVENESS OF BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT TRAINING TO MOTHERS ON HEALTH PHYSICAL OR COGNITIVE SKILLS OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM IN TEHRAN CITY

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND STRESS MANAGEMENT

The Youth Experience Survey 2.0: Instrument Revisions and Validity Testing* David M. Hansen 1 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Final Report. HOS/VA Comparison Project

TESTING AND MEASUREMENT. MERVE DENİZCİ NAZLIGÜL, M.S. Çankaya University

Quick start guide for using subscale reports produced by Integrity

Chapter 9. Youth Counseling Impact Scale (YCIS)

Seattle Personality Inventory Kindergarten-Grade 1 / Years 1-2 Fast Track Project Technical Report Mark Greenberg & Lili Lengua November 10, 1995

Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of an Edgenuity Algebra I Quiz

LANGUAGE TEST RELIABILITY On defining reliability Sources of unreliability Methods of estimating reliability Standard error of measurement Factors

Psychometric evaluation of the self-test (PST) in the responsible gambling tool Playscan (GamTest)

DESIGNING AND VALIDATION OF SOCIO- PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SEXUAL CONSTRAINTS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FEMALE ATHLETES

Chapter 3. Psychometric Properties

Construct Reliability and Validity Update Report

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Teacher Keys Effectiveness. System (TKES) and the Leader Keys Effectiveness System (LKES)

Assessing the Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Dimensions of Stuttering in Young Children

Are dimensions of psycho-social well-being different among Latvian and Romanian University students?

Under the Start Your Search Now box, you may search by author, title and key words.

Assessment of sexual function by DSFI among the Iranian married individuals

Product Interest and Engagement Scale, Beta (PIES-beta): Initial Development

College Smartphone Dependency: Relationships Between Social- Emotional Well-Being and Personality

Assessment of Behavioral Distress and Depression in a Pediatric Population. By: Christina M. Rodriguez and Stephen R. Boggs

Running head: CPPS REVIEW 1

Description of Measure Purpose This measure is a brief, plain-language, reliable scale measuring the quality of youth program participation.

Socioeconomic Status, Parental Support, Motivation and Self-Confidence in Youth Competitive Sport

Key words: State-Trait Anger, Anger Expression, Anger Control, FSTAXI-2, reliability, validity.

Skala Stress. Putaran 1 Reliability. Case Processing Summary. N % Excluded a 0.0 Total

Personal Listening Profile Research Report

How to Compute Mean Scores: CFAI-W

The role of emotional schema in prediction of pathological worry in Iranian students

Convergent Validity of the Strength-Based Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale with Youth in a Residential Setting

Validation of the Chinese Juvenile Victimisation Questionnaire

Teachers Sense of Efficacy Scale: The Study of Validity and Reliability

Development of a measure of self-regulated practice behavior in skilled performers

Business Research Methods. Introduction to Data Analysis

Examining the efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand pre-service teachers intention to use technology*

Everything DiSC Manual

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE skills assessment: technical report

Journal of American Science 2010;6(10) Age and gender differences and construct of the children s emotional intelligence

Coping as a Personality Process: How Elderly Patients Deal with Cataract Surgery

Reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Pain Data Set items as self-report measures

Book review. Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). By C.K. Conners, D. Erhardt, M.A. Sparrow. New York: Multihealth Systems, Inc.

THE RELATION BETWEEN PERSONAL NEED FOR THOUGHTS STRUCTURE, HOPE AND WELL-BEING

Models of Change and the Impact on Organizational Culture: The Sanctuary Model Explored

The Integrated Developmental Model of Supervision: Scale Development and Validation Procedures

An adult version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-A)

Reliability and Validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer Module

PsychTests.com advancing psychology and technology


A B S T R A C T. I ranian R ehabilitation Journal. Article info:

The Turkish adaptation of the Mother-Adult Daughter Questionnaire

PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHIATRY & BRAIN NEUROSCIENCE SECTION

Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences

Calculating clinically significant change: Applications of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale to evaluate client outcomes in private practice

Last Updated: February 17, 2016 Articles up-to-date as of: July 2015

Children's Depression Inventory 2nd Edition: Parent Maria Kovacs, Ph.D.

1. Evaluate the methodological quality of a study with the COSMIN checklist

Examining of adaptability of academic optimism scale into Turkish language

Study the Rate of Practice of Religious Beliefs and Duties in Undergraduate Students of Hormozgan University

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD. method the major components include: Research Design, Research Site and

Development of a New Fear of Hypoglycemia Scale: Preliminary Results

Relationships between stage of change for stress management behavior and perceived stress and coping

Validity and reliability of physical education teachers' beliefs and intentions toward teaching students with disabilities (TBITSD) questionnaire

The Positive Psychotherapy Inventory (PPTI): Reliability and Validity Study in Turkish Population

Reviewer: Jacob Bolzenius Date: 4/6/15. Study Summary Form Fields

Emotional Intelligence Assessment Technical Report

CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY

Depressed mood effects on processing of highand low content structure text in American and Australian college women

Must be the music: Validation of a theory-based survey

Cognitive-Behavioral Assessment of Depression: Clinical Validation of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire

Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering (DST) (Zückner 2016) Instructions on filling in the questionnaire, evaluation and statistical data

Adult Substance Use and Driving Survey-Revised (ASUDS-R) Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity

Development of a Shortened Form of the Coping Responses Inventory-Youth with an Australian Sample

Dr. Hala Hazam Al-Otaibi Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Community Nutrition College of Agriculture and Food Science, King Faisal

Factors Predicting Courtship Stalking Behaviors in Female College Students

Who is happy and why? Subjective well-being and associated thinking styles of US and Canadian students.

The Palin Parent Rating Scales

Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Questionnaire for Use with Medical Students

Al Said Abdul Khalik 1. Egypt Associate Professor, National Center for Examination and Educational Evaluation, Rd. 9 Mokattam, Cairo,

Body avoidance and body checking in clinical eating disorder and non-clinical subjects

Validation of the Russian version of the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA Scale)

Transcription:

Social Competence Scale Parent Version Grade 1 /Year 2 Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne Corrigan December 29, 2002 Table of Contents I. Scale Description II. Report Sample III. Scaling IV. Differences Between Groups V. Recommendations for Use VI. Item and Scale Means and SD's VII. Item and Scale Correlations Citation Instrument Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (CPPRG). (1995). Social Competence Scale (Parent Version). 1 Reports Corrigan, A. (2002). Social Competence Scale Parent Version, Grade 1 /Year 2 (Fast Track Project Technical Report). Available from the Fast Track Project Web site, http://www.fasttrackproject.org Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (CPPRG). (1995). Psychometric Properties of the Social Competence Scale Teacher and Parent Ratings. (Fast Track Project Technical Report). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. Data Sources Unscored: P2D Scored: SCP2 I. Scale Description The Social Competence Scale - Parent Version is a 12-item measure that assesses a child s prosocial behaviors, communication skills, and self control. The Social Competence Scale was created for the Fast Track Project. Some items on the Scale were adapted from the Kendall and Wilcox (1979) and Gersten (1976) assessments. New items were also developed. The Parent Version of the Scale contains a subset of the items on the Teacher Version. Each item on the Social Competence Scale states a behavior that a child may display in a social setting. Examples of statements include: Your child can give suggestions and opinions without being bossy and Your child can calm down when excited or all wound up. The parent assesses how well each statement describes the child. Responses are coded on a five-point Likert scale: Not at all (0), A little (1), Moderately well (2), Well (3), and Very well (4). II. Report Sample This report contains data collected on Cohort 1, Year 2. The data include a high-risk control sample (n=155) and a normative sample (n = 387) for a total N = 463, including overlap. Of the 463 subjects, 32 are missing all responses, including 24 from the normative group (3 from Durham, 12 from Washington, 3 from Pennsylvania, and 6 from Nashville), and 8 from the control group (4 from Durham and 4 from Washington), with overlap between the normative 1 Adaptation of the original. 1

and control groups. None of these measures was used in the analyses. III. Scaling The Social Competence Scale contains two subscales: Prosocial/Communication Skills (Items 4, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12) and Emotional Regulation Skills (Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8). In addition to the subscale scores, a total score on the 12 items is also reported. Subscale scores and the total score are calculated as the mean of responses. If more than half of the items on a subscale score or on the total score are missing responses, the score is not calculated. Measures with all responses missing are not scored. The alpha coefficients for the normative sample and control sample are: Normative Sample Control Sample Prosocial/Communication Skills Scale 0.80 0.74 Emotional Regulation Skills Scale 0.80 0.77 Social Competence Scale -Total 0.87 0.84 IV. Differences Between Groups T-tests of means on the total score and the subscale scores between the normative and control samples yielded the following results: Normative Sample Control Sample Mean SD Mean SD DF t Value Pr > t Prosocial/Communication Skills Subscale 2.85 0.67 2.47 0.65 430-5.68 <.0001 Emotional Regulation Skills Subscale 2.29 0.70 1.75 0.69 430-7.51 <.0001 Social Competence Scale Total 2.57 0.63 2.11 0.60 430-7.26 <.0001 V. Recommendations for Use T-tests of means for subscale scores and for the total score on the Social Competence Scale show significant differences between the normative and control groups. The internal consistency measure (Cronbach alpha values) indicates that the total score and subscale scores are useful. 2

VI. Item and Scale Means and SDs Means and Standard Deviations for Social Competence Scale Items Cohort 1, Year 2, Normative Sample 1.99 1.89 2.21 2.26 2.34 2.57 2.92 2.07 2.96 3.29 2.69 2.48 0.98 1.07 1.07 1.06 0.93 0.80 0.95 Means and Standard Deviations for Social Competence Scale Items Cohort 1, Year 2, Control Sample 1.57 1.52 1.66 1.92 1.95 2.17 2.63 1.65 2.65 3.12 2.31 2.17 0.97 1.12 1.06 0.97 0.99 1.05 0.90 0.82 0.98 1.08 Means and Standard Deviations for Social Competence Scores Cohort 1, Year 2, Normative Sample 2.77 2.18 2.47 0.68 0.73 0.65 0.50 0.33 0.42 Means and Standard Deviations for Social Competence Scale Scores Cohort 1, Year 2, Control Sample 2.47 1.75 2.11 0.65 0.69 0.60 0.33 0.17 0.25 3.83 3.92 3

VII. Item and Subscale Correlations Social Competence Scale Subscale Correlations Combined Normative and Control Sample Pearson Correlation Coefficients, N = 432 Prob > r under H0: Rho=0 0 0.691 0.691 0.913 0.913 0 0.926 0.926 0 Social Competence Scale - Item Correlations Combined Normative and Control Sample Pearson Correlation Coefficients, N = 432 Prob > r under H0: Rho=0 p2dsc1 p2dsc2 p2dsc3 p2dsc4 p2dsc5 p2dsc6 p2dsc7 p2dsc8 p2dsc9 p2dsc10 p2dsc11 p2dsc12 0 0.458 0.458 0.417 0.448 0.517 0.333 0.528 0.324 0.424 0.411 0.417 0 0.241 0.241 0.231 0.348 0.298 0.204 0.423 0.368 0.292 0.231 0 0.404 0.404 0.432 0.369 0.415 0.269 0.301 0.448 0.348 0 0.353 0.353 0.355 0.375 0.351 0.345 0.438 0.517 0.298 0.432 0.355 0 0.341 0.487 0.319 0.371 0.372 0.326 0.333 0.204 0.369 0.375 0.341 0 0.401 0.401 0.323 0.528 0.423 0.415 0.487 0 0.419 0.419 0.349 0.425 0.473 0.384 0.269 0.351 0.319 0.349 0 0.420 0.465 0.442 0.324 0.301 0.345 0.371 0.425 0.420 0 0.536 0.536 0.440 0.362 0.424 0.368 0.372 0.473 0.465 0.440 0 0.475 0.475 0.299 0.411 0.292 0.438 0.326 0.323 0.384 0.442 0.362 0.299 0 0.530 0.530 0 4

References Clark, L., Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1985). Development and validation of a social skills assessment measure: The TROSS-C. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 347-356. Gesten, E.L. (1976). A Health Resources Inventory: The development of a measure of the personal and social competence of primary-grade children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 775-786. Kendall, P.C., & Wilcox, L.E. (1979). Self-control in children: Development of a rating scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1020-1029. 5