SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Similar documents
SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

SUMMARY THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

SYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005

SYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

International co-ordinating investigator Dr Dencho Osmanliev, St Sofia, Pulmonary Dept, 19 D Nestorov Str, Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria.

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

SYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004

International Co-ordinating investigator None appointed.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

SYNOPSIS. Study centres This was a multicentre study conducted in 53 centres in Sweden.

James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren, MD

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume: Page:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

SYNOPSIS. A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of RHINOCORT

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Clinical Trial Synopsis

BRL /RSD-101RLL/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

SYNOPSIS. ER OROS Paliperidone: Clinical Study Report R SCH-301

Supplementary Appendix

Asthma in Pregnancy. Asthma. Chronic Airway Inflammation. Objective Measures of Airflow. Peak exp. flow rate (PEFR)

Abstract Background Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has antiinflammatory

Study No. 178-CL-008 Report Final Version, 14 Dec 2006 Reissued Version, 18 Jul 2011 Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. Page 13 of 122

2. SYNOPSIS Name of Sponsor/Company:

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

G. Boyd on behalf of a UK Study group

Budesonide treatment of moderate and severe asthma in children: A doseresponse

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS.

Aerospan (flunisolide)

Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended-Release Tablets M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/1109

Estimated date of first patient enrolled Q III/IV Estimated date of last patient completed Q3 2015

Omalizumab (Xolair ) ( Genentech, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) September Indication

SYNOPSIS. Study centre(s) A total of 91 centres across Canada participated in this study.

SYNOPSIS (PROTOCOL WX17796)

SYNOPSIS. Study Coordinator. Study centre(s)

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

BRL /RSD-101C0F/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

SYNOPSIS. Publications No publications at the time of writing this report.

Rapporteur s Public Assessment Report for paediatric studies submitted in accordance with Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No1901/2006, as amended

Step-down approach in chronic stable asthma: A comparison of reducing dose Inhaled Formoterol/ Budesonide with maintaining Inhaled Budesonide.

Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) for ED Management of Acute Asthma Exacerbation

Clinical Study Report SLO-AD-1 Final Version DATE: 09 December 2013

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report AI Addendum #1. Open-label Dosing Phase

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

SYNOPSIS. Administration: subcutaneous injection Batch number(s):

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume:

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

SYNOPSIS. Study centre(s) The study was performed in Denmark, Norway and Sweden at 20 sites.

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab DE019 OLE (5-year) Clinical Study Report Amendment 1 R&D/06/095. (For National Authority Use Only)

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ

Daclizumab improves asthma control in patients with moderate to. severe persistent asthma: A randomized, controlled trial

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Smooth Muscle & Asthma: Bronchial Thermoplasty - A Smooth Muscle Modifier

Sponsor. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name. Agomelatine Therapeutic Area of Trial. Major depressive disorder Approved Indication

Study Population: 12 years and older A EF Calcipotriene Foam, 0.005%

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

23-Aug-2011 Lixisenatide (AVE0010) - EFC6014 Version number: 1 (electronic 1.0)

Relvar Ellipta (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol [as trifenatate]) for the treatment of patients with asthma

SYNOPSIS INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER (FOR NATIONAL AUTHORITY USE ONLY) Volume: Page:

Not available 100/6mcg 2 BD formoterol (Fostair MDI) 100/6mcg 33

PFIZER INC. Study Initiation Date and Primary Completion or Completion Dates: 11 November 1998 to 17 September 1999

Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial. Online Data Supplement

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives : Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Public Assessment Report for paediatric studies submitted in accordance with Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No1901/2006, as amended.

Meeting the Challenges of Asthma

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SAR ACT sarilumab Version number : 1 (electronic 1.0)

BUDESONIDE AND FORMOTEROL (SYMBICORT ): Α A REVIEW

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab R&D/04/118. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

the use of inhaled corticosteroids for at least 3 months preceding the study;

Rimegepant Pivotal Phase 3 Trial Results - Conference Call March 26, Biohaven

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume: Page:

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study B4Z-MC-LYBX

Product: Denosumab (AMG 162) Clinical Study Report: month Primary Analysis Date: 21 November 2016 Page 1

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1

II: Moderate Worsening airflow limitations Dyspnea on exertion, cough, and sputum production; patient usually seeks medical

Rapid Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Acute Asthma Gustavo J. Rodrigo, MD.

Synopsis. Clinical Report Synopsis for Protocol Name of Company: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Transcription:

Drug product: Drug substance(s): Document No.: Edition No.: 1 Study code: Accolate Zafirlukast (ZD9188) 9188IL/0138 Date: 02 May 2007 SYNOPSIS A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, -controlled, Parallel group, 15-week Trial of Zafirlukast (ACCOLATE ) Versus Low dose Inhaled Corticosteroids After a 7-day Course of Oral Corticosteroids in Subjects With Asthma International co-ordinating investigator Dr. Michael Manning; Allergy & Immunology Associates, LTD; 7514 E Monterey Way; Scottsdale, AZ 858251, USA. Study centre(s) Study 9188IL/0138 was conducted at 39 centers in 1 country (USA). Publications There were no publications at the time of this report. Study dates Phase of development First subject enrolled 02 May 1996 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 24 January 1997

Objectives The primary objectives of the study were To assess the efficacy of zafirlukast (20 mg BID) relative to that of low-dose ICS or placebo after a 7-day course of oral corticosteroids in patients with asthma. To assess the safety and tolerability of zafirlukast (20 mg BID) relative to that of low-dose ICS or placebo after a 7-day course of oral corticosteroids. Study design The multicenter study consisted of 3 parts: A 1-week observation/screening period. A 7- to 14-day single-blind placebo (double-dummy) run-in period. A 15-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, efficacy and safety period comparing zafirlukast (20 mg BID) to beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (84 μg, 4 times daily [QID]) and to placebo. All patients were to receive a course of oral prednisone (40 mg, once per day [QD]) in addition to their assigned DB treatment for the first 7 days of the DB period. The DB period began at Visit 3, which was Day 0 on the study timeline. For the DB period, patients were randomized into 3 treatment groups. The patients in the group hereafter referred to as the zafirlukast group used active zafirlukast tablets and placebo BDP inhalers during the 15-week DB period. The patients in the group hereafter referred to as the BDP group used placebo zafirlukast tablets and active BDP inhalers during the 15-week DB period. The patients in the group hereafter referred to as the placebo group used placebo zafirlukast tablets and placebo BDP inhalers during the 15-week DB period. Target subject population and sample size Approximately 600 moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients 12 years of age were expected to receive study medications and undergo study procedures to achieve approximately 360 evaluable patients. 2

Investigational product and comparator(s): dosage, mode of administration and batch numbers Zafirlukast tablets (for oral use, BID) or matching placebo and BDP inhalation aerosol (2 puffs, 42 μg/puff, QID) or matching placebo were supplied for 15 weeks. Prednisone tablets (40 mg, QD) were supplied for use during the first 7 days of the DB period. Zafirlukast was labeled with instructions for proper use, including taking it 1 hour before or 2 hours after food. Instructions for use of BDP and prednisone were per package labeling. Albuterol inhalers were also supplied as rescue medication, and instructions for use, per package label, were given to patients. Duration of treatment The maximum duration of the DB treatment defined in the protocol was 15 weeks (105 days). Criteria for evaluation (main variables) Efficacy and pharmacokinetics There were no pharmacokinetic variables in this study. Primary variable: Mean daytime asthma symptoms score Mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), before β 2 -agonist use Secondary variables: Office visit forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) Total mornings with asthma Total nighttime awakenings Mean as needed (prn) β 2 -agonist use Treatment failure rates 3

Safety The safety variables were: Extent of exposure Categories of Aes Most common Aes Clinical laboratory tests Zafirlukast is known to affect markers of liver function, this report identifies all patients with potentially significant abnormalities for alanine aminotransferase (ALT 5 x the upper limit of normal [ULN]) or for bilirubin ( 3 mg/dl, which is 51 µmol/l) or for both. These clinically significant abnormalities were retrospectively categorized as OAEs if they were reported as AEs by the investigator. Vital signs, ECG, and physical examinations Subjective symptoms, diaries Statistical methods All patients who received study treatment were to be included in the safety analyses. Analyses of efficacy were to be performed on 2 populations, the intention to treat (ITT) population and the per protocol (PP) population. The ITT population was to include all patients randomized to receive the trial drug. The PP population excluded patients who had selected protocol violations or who deviated from procedures as described in the protocol. Safety results from this study were analyzed using summary statistics only. The efficacy analyses were selected to demonstrate that zafirlukast 20 mg BID is at least as efficacious as BDP 84 μg QID (ie, non-inferior to BDP). Subject population All treated patients (N=420) were included in the safety analyses. The number of patients included in the efficacy analyses was 408. The characteristics for the individual treatment groups were similar. 4

Table S1 Demographic and baseline characteristics for treated patients Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID Total (N=420) Sex Female, n (%) 74 (53.6) 88 (62.4) 79 (56.0) 241 (57.4) Male, n (%) 64 (46.4) 53 (37.6) 62 (44.0) 179 (42.6) Age at entry, years Mean (SD) 34.9 (13.1) 34.7 (14.0) 34.5 (14.4) 34.7 (13.8) Range 12 to 70 12 to 86 12 to 74 12 to 86 Race Caucasian, n (%) 124 (89.9) 128 (90.8) 127 (90.1) 379 (90.2) Black, n (%) 9 (6.5) 11 (7.8) 7 (5.0) 27 (6.4) Asian, n (%) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7) 3 (0.7) Hispanic, n (%) 4 (2.9) 1 (0.7) 6 (4.3) 11 (2.6) FEV 1 % predicted at baseline Mean (SD) 67.0 (10.2) 66.5 (10.4) 67.6 (11.5) 67.1 (10.7) Range 43.0 to 87.0 44.0 to 91.5 34.0 to 92.0 34.0 to 92.0 Data from Table T1.2 and T1.3 (Section 8). BID: Twice daily; FEV 1 : Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; SD: Standard deviation. Table S2 Patient completion and withdrawal for double-blind period Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID n (%) n (%) n (%) Completed study 103 (74.6) 116 (82.3) 88 (62.4) Missing completion/ 1 (0.7) 0 0 withdrawal form Withdrew from study 34 (24.6) 25 (17.7) 53 (37.6) Asthma became 12 (8.7) 2 (1.4) 23 (16.3) worse a Adverse event b 3 (2.2) 5 (3.5) 3 (2.1) Lost to follow up 6 (4.3) 6 (4.3) 7 (5.0) 5

Table S2 Patient completion and withdrawal for double-blind period Protocol noncompliance Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID n (%) n (%) n (%) 5 (3.6) 5 (3.5) 12 (8.5) Other reasons 8 (5.8) 7 (5.0) 8 (5.7) Data from Table T2.1 (Section 8). a Includes exacerbations reported as adverse events. b Excludes asthma. BID: Twice daily. Efficacy results Primary variable: Daytime asthma symptoms score All 3 treatment groups had a reduction in their mean daytime symptoms score at endpoint as compared to baseline. The mean change at endpoint was -0.22 for the zafirlukast 20 mg BID group, -0.56 for the BDP group, and -0.11 for the placebo group. Zafirlukast 20 mg BID is at least as efficacious as placebo (but not statistically significantly different from placebo) and not equivalent to BDP with respect to asthma symptoms scores, See Figure 2. 6

Figure 1 Mean change from baseline over time in daytime asthma symptoms scores (ITT population) Note: 20 MG BID data were obtained using zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day. BDP data were obtained using beclomethasone dipropionate 84 μg QID. 7

Figure 2 Ninety-five percent confidence intervals between treatments for daytime asthma symptoms scores at end of treatment (ITT population) Note: The 20 MG BID data were obtained using zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day. BDP data were obtained using beclomethasone dipropionate 84 μg QID. The mean difference between BDP and placebo was 0.42 with a 95% CI of 0.27 to 0.57. Thus, BDP was superior to placebo with respect to asthma symptoms scores. Morning peak expiratory flow rate before β 2 -agonist use The zafirlukast 20 mg BID group showed a slight improvement in their mean morning PEFR values at endpoint (7.14 L/min), the BDP group had considerable improvement (32.69 L/min), while the placebo group had a slight deterioration (-7.64 L/min) in their morning PEFR values at endpoint. The mean difference between BDP and placebo was 39.14 with a 95% CI of 27.48 to 50.80. A plot of the mean changes from baseline over time is presented in Figure 3. A plot of the 95% CIs for the mean differences between treatments in changes from baseline at the end of treatment is presented in Figure 3. 8

Figure 3 Mean change from baseline over time in morning peak expiratory flow rate (ITT population) Note: The 20 MG BID data were obtained using zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day. BDP data were obtained using beclomethasone dipropionate 84 μg QID. A plot of the 95% CIs for the mean differences between treatments in changes from baseline at the end of treatment is presented in Figure 4. 9

Figure 4 Ninety-five percent confidence intervals between treatments for morning peak expiratory flow rate at end of treatment (ITT population) Note: The 20 MG BID data were obtained using zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day. BDP data were obtained using beclomethasone dipropionate 84 μg QID. Secondary variables: Evening peak expiratory flow rate before β 2 -agonist use Only the BDP group had a mean improvement in evening PEFR over baseline. The patients treated with zafirlukast 20 mg BID or placebo had a mean deterioration in their evening PEFR from baseline. Mean changes in evening PEFR at endpoint as compared to baseline were -4.11 L/min for zafirlukast 20 mg BID, 21.51 L/min for BDP, and -8.79 L/min for placebo. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second The BDP group showed a mean improvement from baseline in FEV 1, while the zafirlukast 20 mg BID and placebo groups showed almost no change from baseline. The mean changes from baseline FEV 1 at endpoint were 0.05 L for zafirlukast 20 mg BID, 0.32 L for BDP, and -0.01 L for placebo. 10

Percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second The BDP group showed a marked improvement in mean percent of predicted FEV 1 from baseline, while the zafirlukast 20 mg BID group showed only a small improvement and the placebo group had almost no change. Mean change from baseline for percent of predicted FEV 1 was 2.19 for zafirlukast 20 mg BID, 9.39 for BDP, and 0.28 for placebo. Mornings with asthma symptoms All 3 groups showed a decrease in the mean number of mornings with asthma symptoms. The mean change from baseline in number of mornings with asthma symptoms at endpoint was -0.8 for zafirlukast 20 mg BID, -1.51 for BDP, and -0.48 for placebo. Nighttime awakening The mean change from baseline in number of nighttime awakenings at endpoint was 0.33 for zafirlukast 20 mg BID, -1.50 for BDP, and 0.80 for placebo. β 2 -agonist use The mean change from baseline in β 2 -agonist use at endpoint (puffs/day) was -0.03 for zafirlukast 20 mg BID, -1.47 for BDP, and 0.54 for placebo. Treatment failure rates The criteria for treatment failure were: an asthma exacerbation reported as an adverse event, patient need for oral steroids, or withdrawal for the reason asthma became worse. Eighty-four patients (32 zafirlukast 20 mg BID, 12 BDP, and 40 placebo) had treatment failures. Table S3 summarizes the treatment failures by treatment group. (Note that patients could have had more than 1 reason for treatment failure.) Treatment failures were significantly less common (p<0.001) in the BDP group than in the zafirlukast or placebo treatment groups. The difference between zafirlukast and placebo was not statistically significant. Table S3 Number of patients with treatment failure Zafirlukast 20 mg BID, N=134 BDP, 84 μg QID N=137, N=137 Reason for failure n (%) n (%) n (%) Asthma exacerbation reported as AE 14 (10.4) 4 (2.9) 14 (10.2) Withdrew due to worsening asthma 12 (9.0) 2 (1.5) 23 (16.8) Patient took oral steroids 27 (20.1) 8 (5.8) 30 (21.9) Total unique patients (any reason) 32 (23.9) 12 (8.8) 40 (29.2) AE: Adverse event; BDP: Beclomethasone dipropionate; BID: Twice daily. 11

Safety results Table S4 presents an overview of exposure for patients in each treatment group in terms of duration of treatment and total zafirlukast exposure. Table S4 Duration of treatment, days Overview of exposure by duration for double-blind patients Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID Mean (SD) 91.1 (29.9) 94.4 (28.0) 83.0 (34.2) Range 1 to 120 1 to 114 6 to 120 Total zafirlukast exposure a, mg Mean (SD) 3643.2 (1197.3) NA NA Range 40 to 4800 NA NA Data from Table T2.2 (Section 8). a Includes exposure to oral corticosteroid (prednisone) during the first week of the DB period. BDP: Beclomethasone dipropionate; BID: Twice daily; NA: Not applicable; SD: Standard deviation. The maximum duration of DB exposure defined in the protocol was 15 weeks (105 days). Exposure data indicate the mean duration for the zafirlukast 20 mg BID group was 91.1 days (range 1 to 120 days), compared to means of 94.4 days and 83.0 days for the BDP and placebo groups, respectively. Table S5 presents the number of patients from the study that had an AE in any category. Note that the AEs summarized in this report were those AEs with onset after the first DB dose. Table S5 Patients Number (%) of adverse events experienced in any category Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID n (%) n (%) n (%) Patients with AEs 89 (64.5) 89 (63.1) 96 (68.1) Patient deaths due to AEs 0 0 0 Patient with SAEs 4 (2.9) 8 (5.7) 5 (3.5) Patients withdrawn due to AEs a 13 (9.4) 7 (5.0) 22 (15.6) Patients with drug-related AEs 10 (7.2) 18 (12.8) 11 (7.8) 12

Table S5 Number (%) of adverse events experienced in any category Events Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID Total AEs 171 NA 201 NA 189 NA Drug-related AEs 15 NA 32 NA 19 NA Data from Table T3.1 (Section 8). a Includes asthma AEs. AE: Adverse event; BID: Twice daily; NA: Not applicable; SAE: Serious adverse event. The percentage of patients in the study who experienced AEs was similar among the 3 treatment groups (between 63.1% and 68.1%). The percentage of patients with SAEs was highest in the BDP group (5.7%), and the percentage with DAEs was highest in the placebo group (15.6%). In addition, 18 patients from the BDP group experienced 32 drug-related AEs, compared to lower numbers in the zafirlukast 20 mg BID and placebo groups (10 patients and 11 patients experienced 15 AEs and 19 AEs, respectively). Table S6 presents the AEs experienced by the highest number of patients, including the entire study population and all study periods. Table S6 Adverse event Number (%) of patients with the most commonly reported adverse events ( 3% of patients in any group) sorted by decreasing order of frequency Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID (COSTART preferred term) n (%) n (%) n (%) Pharyngitis 31 (22.5) 33 (23.4) 28 (19.9) Headache 14 (10.1) 15 (10.6) 12 (8.5) Aggravation reaction a 14 (10.1) 4 (2.8) 16 (11.3) Sinusitis 10 (7.2) 12 (8.5) 14 (9.9) Accidental injury 6 (4.3) 4 (2.8) 1 (0.7) Rash 5 (3.6) 4 (2.8) 1 (0.7) Back pain 4 (2.9) 2 (1.4) 6 (4.3) Dyspepsia 1 (0.7) 6 (4.3) 4 (2.8) 13

Table S6 Adverse event Number (%) of patients with the most commonly reported adverse events ( 3% of patients in any group) sorted by decreasing order of frequency Zafirlukast 20 mg BID BDP 84 μg QID (COSTART preferred term) n (%) n (%) n (%) Cough increased 1 (0.7) 5 (3.5) 1 (0.7) a For all aggravation reactions reported in this table, the reported text was related to asthma exacerbation, with the exception of 1 patient (0028/2809), whose AE reported text was exacerbation of depression. Data from Table T3.3 (Section 8). BDP: Beclomethasone dipropionate; BID: Twice daily. There were no deaths and no OAEs during this study. The frequency and nature of the non-fatal SAEs and DAEs did not raise any new safety concerns. Clinical laboratory results Laboratory results were retrospectively examined to identify patients with marked abnormalities indicative of abnormal liver function, specifically ALT levels 5 x ULN and/or bilirubin levels 3 mg/dl (51 µmol/l). No patients met the criteria during the DB period. No meaningful deviations from the known safety profile of zafirlukast were identified from the clinical laboratory results. Vital signs, ECG, physical findings, and other observations related to safety No meaningful deviations from the known safety profile of zafirlukast were identified from these results. Conclusion(s) This 420-patient, 15-week, double-blind study of moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients 12 years of age had as its objective comparing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zafirlukast with those of low-dose ICS (BDP 84 μg QID) or placebo after a 7-day course of oral corticosteroids. 14

This study failed to demonstrate that zafirlukast 20 mg BID is at least as efficacious as BDP 84 μg QID. The primary efficacy variables were daytime asthma symptoms scores (zafirlukast not statistically significantly better than placebo and not equivalent to BDP) and morning PEFR (zafirlukast at least as efficacious as placebo but not equivalent to BDP). For other efficacy variables (evening PEFR, FEV 1, percent of predicted FEV 1, mornings with asthma symptoms, nighttime awakenings, β 2 -agonist use, and treatment failure rates), BDP was superior to both zafirlukast 20 mg BID and placebo. During this study, zafirlukast 20 mg BID was well tolerated. The AE profile and other safety variable findings were consistent with the known safety profile. Date of the report 30 November 2006 15