Drug Filled Stent Optical Coherence Tomography Results from RevElution Trial Stent Strut Coverage and Stent Apposition

Similar documents
DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

Stephen G. Ellis, M.D. Professor of Medicine Director Invasive Services Co-Director Cardiac Gene Bank

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

FANTOM II trial: Clinical results from the Fantom Sirolimus-Eluting BRS. Norbert Frey, MD University of Kiel, Germany

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Disclosure Eberhard Grube, M.D.

OCT Technology: Differences between Biodegradable and Durable Polymers: Insights from the LEADERS Trial LEADERS OCT

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Dr. Robert J. van Geuns. Thoraxcenter ErasmusMC Rotterdam On behalf of Dr. Jean Fajadet and Co-investigators

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Second Generation Drug Eluting Stents: From Inhibition to Healing

Bioabsorbable Scaffolding: Technology and Clinical Update. PD Dr. Nicolas Diehm, MD, FESC Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

COMPLEX CASES: LEFT MAIN

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

HCS Working Group Seminars Macedonia Pallas Hotel, Friday 21 st February Drug-eluting stents Are they all equal?

Evaluation COMBO s Healing Profile The EGO-COMBO Serial OCT Study

REFCTRI/2010/ CTRI Website URL -

Prospective, multicentre evaluation of the DESolve Novolimus-Eluting coronary BRS: imaging outcomes and 5Y clinical and imaging results

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

Pathology of percutaneous interventions (PCI) in coronary arteries. Allard van der Wal, MD.PhD; Pathologie AMC, Amsterdam, NL

Bioabsorbable stents: early clinical results. Dr Angela Hoye MB ChB, PhD Senior Lecturer in Cardiology Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

From a DES to a BMS* Biosensors Clinical Trial Program. Taking the LEAD in DES Clinical Excellence. From Single de Novo.

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Update from the Tryton IDE study

BIOFLOW V Comparison of UltraThin Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Polymer with Thin Everolimus- Eluting Durable Polymer Stents

Sirolimus Nanocrystal Balloon Based Delivery for Coronary DES ISR

ReZolve2 Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Clinical Program Update

Taking DES technology from concept to long term clinical evidence. Aurore Bouvier Global Product Manager Biosensors Europe

Element Clinical Program Perseus Late Breaking News and the Platinum Study Design

Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

Biosensors Lunch Symposium

DISCOVER Ultimaster with Optical Frequency Domain Imaging

The BIO revolution: bioadsorbable stents. Federico Conrotto Cardiologia 2 Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

Drug eluting stents (DES) have decreased

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

EXPERIENCE MAGIC IN ITS TOUCH

Insights from the Magmaris Clinical Data: BIOSOLVE II and BIOSOLVE III 12 Month Follow Up

Run-Lin Gao, MD, FACC. On Behalf of I-LOVE-IT Trial Investigators

PCI with Polymer-free Stent

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

BIONICS Trial BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System In Coronary Stenosis Trial

Catch-up Phenomenon: Insights from Pathology

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

Biolimus A9 Drug-Eluting Stents: Technical Aspects and a Comprehensive Review of the EU, Asia-Pacific, and US Clinical Trial Program

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Late Loss Is The Single Best Parameter For Estimating Stent-Based Restenosis Resistance

Bioresorbable Stents: Innovation or Bust?

Le# main treatment with Stentys stent. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Results of TROFI II Study. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD. Imperial college, London, UK On behalf of the PI s and the TROFI II investigators

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Coronary Stent Choice in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

Complex PCI. Your partner in complex PCI: In-stent restenosis (ISR)

Ultimaster clinical results in left main and bifurcations

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Analysis of neointimal coverage after silolimus-eluting stent implantation using optical coherence tomography.

Evolution In Interventional Cardiology. Jawed Polad Jeroen Bosch Hospital s-hertogenbosch The Netherlands

Drug eluting balloon for bifurcation lesion: is it useful?

OCT in the Evaluation of Vascular Healing Following DES Implantation: Will It Be a Helpful Tool to Reduce Stent Thrombosis?

STENTYS for Le, Main Sten2ng. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

Contemporary therapy of bifurcation lesions

Ενδοςτεφανιαίεσ προκζςεισ (stents):παρόν και μζλλον. Σ Χατηθμιλτιάδθσ Αναπλθρωτισ Κακθγθτισ Πανεπιςτθμιακό Νοςοκομείο ΑΧΕΠΑ

What Stent to Use? JASVINDAR SINGH MD, FACC

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Yukon Chrome PC. Translumina trust is what counts. Sirolimus Eluting CoCr Coronary Stent System. 5-Years Randomized Clinical Follow-Up

DES In-stent Restenosis

Results of TROFI II Study. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD. Imperial college, London, UK On behalf of the PI s and the TROFI II investigators

ABT 578 Elution from Phosphorylcholine: Zomaxx (Abbott)

Drug Eluting Stents: Bifurcation and Left Main Approach

Pieter Stella, MD, PhD

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

Technical Characteristics of coronary prostheses(stents)

BIOFLOW-III an all comers registry with a Sirolimus Eluting Stent: Presentation of 1-Year TLF Data in patients with complex lesions

Drug eluting stents From revolution to evolution. Current limitations

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Tailored bifurcation therapy

Absorbable Scaffolds the Future of Coronary Interventions?

DISAPPEARING STENT: IS THE TIME APPEARED?

BioMatrix TM : The New Biodegradable Abluminally Coated DES BioMatrix TM Clinical Program

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

Ian T. Meredith AM. MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FCSANZ, FACC, FSCAI, FAPSIC MonashHeart, Monash Medical Centre & Monash University Melbourne, Australia

LM stenting - Cypher

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

Transcription:

Drug Filled Stent Optical Coherence Tomography Results from RevElution Trial Stent Strut Coverage and Stent Apposition Prof Martin Rothman on behalf of Dr. Stephen G. Worthley Alexandre Abizaid, Ajay J Kirtane, Daniel Simon, Stephan Windecker, Gregg W Stone Institution(s): The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil, Columbia University / Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, United States, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY

Drug Filled Stent Background Most drug-eluting stents (DES) use a polymer to control elution of an antiproliferative drug to reduce neointimal hyperplasia Alternatives to durable polymer DES have shortcomings: Bioabsorbable polymer technologies raise biocompatibility and inflammation concerns during the polymer degradation phase (3-24 months) Polymer-free nanotechnologies may struggle to control and sustain drug elution The drug-filled stent (DFS, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) is designed to achieve controlled and sustained drug elution without a polymer A BMS surface avoids adverse effects of polymer degradation and could potentially allow for a shorter DAPT duration Drug Filled Stent with reversion to BMS might allow for short DAPT

Drug Filled Stent Concept 0.02mm DFS is a novel polymer-free drug-eluting stent Drug coating DFS is made from a tri-layer wire: Tantalum Outer cobalt alloy layer for strength Cobalt alloy Middle tantalum layer for radiopacity Inner layer core material is removed and becomes a lumen that is continuously coated with drug Drug (sirolimus) is protected and contained inside the stent Drug releases through multiple laser-drilled holes on the abluminal side of the stent Drug elution is controlled and sustained through natural diffusion via direct interaction with the vessel wall. Elution profile is similar to durable polymer DES Drug coats inner lumen Drug elutes through abluminal holes Uniform distribution in stented area

Drug Filled Stent Preclinical Results INFLAMMATION Low inflammation similar to BMS Peri-strut Inflammation score 28 Days 90 Days 180 Days DRUG ELUTION Sustained elution similar to existing DES DFS 0.00 ± 0.00 BMS 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 P-value > 0.99 > 0.99 > 0.99 Representative histopathological image of DFS at 28 days IC 50 = 0.2 ng/mg 1 Perkins LE. et al. J Interv Cardiol. 2009;22:S28 S41. Porcine model

Radial Stiffness per Unit Length (N/mm per mm) Drug Filled Stent Preclinical Results DFS demonstrated improved radial strength Stent Radial Stiffness (3.0 mm stent, n=3) 6.0 5.0 4.0 4.4 P=0.05 P=0.90 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.0 1.0 Radial strength was tested by measuring the force required to radially compress the DFS stent (diameter 3.0 mm) in a standard iris test and compared with the Resolute Onyx DES and Integrity BMS 0.0 DFS INTEGRITY ONYX Results presented as average ± standard deviation.

Radiopacity Contrast (arb. Unit) Drug Filled Stent Preclinical Results In-vitro Assessment DFS and Resolute Onyx demonstrated greater radiopacity compared to Integrity Stent Radiopacity Contrast 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.43 0.47 0.36 In-vitro radiodensity assessment (Micro focused X-ray) 0.0 DFS ONYX INTEGRITY Results presented as average of 6 measures ± SD

Drug Filled Stent Preclinical Results Visual Assessment In-vivo Radiopacity Evaluation in Porcine Model Integrity stent Resolute Onyx stent Drug-filled stent Omega stent Drug-filled stent Under fluoroscopy, DFS demonstrated greater radiopacity than the Integrity stent, and similar radiopacity as the Resolute Onyx and Omega stents Data on File at Medtronic

Tissue associated tissue content (ng/mg) - 15µm holes tissue content (ng/mg) - 20µm holes tissue content (ng/mg) - 25µm holes Stent associated %residual drug load - 15µm holes %residual drug load - 20µm holes %residual drug load - 25µm holes Drug Filled Stent Preclinical Results 15 µm 20 µm 25 µm 100 Half-life = 31.6 d 100 Half-life = 29.8 d 100 Half-life = 27.7 d 80 60 60 60 builds 40 that had different base 40 hole diameters (15, 20, 25 μm). 40 In 20 conclusion the results indicated 20 that: 0 0 DFS 0 10 eluted 20 30 40drug 50 60 in 70 a 80sustained 90 0 10 and 20 titratable 30 40 50 60 70 manner: 80 90 implantation duration (days) implantation duration (days) 2 80 In this study the in vivo release kinetics were measured for 3 prototype DFS 2 Figure investigations 2: Local pharmacokinetics on dissolution-based of prototype drug DFS elution with different are ongoing. hole sizes. (Top) Stent residual drug (diamonds) follow bi-exponential elution kinetics (lines). (Bottom) Tissue retained drug ( 3d) kinetics as the sustained elution drug pool. Box inserts list hole sizes (µm) and sustained elution half-life (days). 80 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 implantation duration (days) hole size pool of readily soluble drug & sustained elution half-life As a result, DFS hole-size titrated peak tissue content and subsequent 1.5 1.5 1.5 decline to a plateau representing high affinity bound drug: hole size 1 1 1 peak drug content in tissue & post peak tissue clearance Tissue delivery by prototype DFS with different holes sizes was 0.5 0.5 0.5 Apparent retention plateau Apparent retention plateau Apparent retention plateau 0bioequivalent as the dependence 0 on elution rate diminished 0 over time 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 implantation duration (days) implantation duration (days) implantation duration (days) Drug elution from DFS is controlled by diffusion and dissolution. Further 2

RevElution Clinical Trial Trial Design De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Vessel Diameter: 2.25 mm 3.5mm Lesion Length 27 mm Medtronic Polymer-Free Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent (N = 100) 10-15 sites in Australia, Brazil Singapore Clinical 30d 6mo 9mo 12mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr 15 15 15 15 30 15 30 Angio/OCT 30d 2mo 3mo 6mo 9mo 12mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr Angio/IVUS N = 50 N = 50 Primary Endpoint: Late Lumen Loss (LL) at 9 months post-procedure as measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Key Secondary Endpoints: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), Cardiac Death (CD), Target Vessel MI (TVMI), Target Vessel Failure (TVF), Target Lesion Failure (TLF), Stent Thrombosis (ST), Acute Success (device, lesion, procedure) Angiographic /IVUS: Binary Angiographic Restenosis (BAR) rate (defined as 50% diameter stenosis (DS)); Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS), Minimal luminal diameter, In-segment late lumen loss, Late loss index, Neointimal hyperplasia volume and percent volume obstruction (%VO), as measured by IVUS OCT Endpoints: Stent Strut Tissue Coverage, Stent Apposition, Neointimal tissue thickness, Volume obstruction, Tissue Type Pharmacokinetic parameters: 12 PK timepoints up to 30 days will be assessed

RevElution Clinical Trial Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria Evidence of ischemic coronary disease Unstable angina, stable angina, silent ischemia and/or positive functional study Lesion characteristics Single or dual de novo lesions in two separate native target vessels RVD 2.25 3.5 mm Lesion length 27 mm TIMI flow 2 Diameter stenosis 50% and < 100% Key Exclusion Criteria Acute MI < 72h (unless cardiac enzymes have returned to normal) Previous PCI of target vessel < 9months Planned PCI of any vessel < 30 days or of target vessel < 12 months Unprotected left main, aorto-ostial, bypass graft, bifurcation, heavily calcified lesions Target vessel that is excessively tortuous, has thrombus or requires use of other non- PTCA devices (such as cutting balloon, etc.) Hx stroke or TIA < 6 months PUD or UGIB < 6 months LVEF < 30%

RevElution Clinical Trial Trial Design 9 Month Cohort 50 subjects 100 Subjects 24 Month Cohort 50 subjects OCT Sub-Group 30 subjects OCT Sub-Group 30 subjects 20 subjects 1M OCT Sub- Group 15 subjects 3M OCT Sub- Group 15 subjects 2M OCT Sub- Group 15 subjects 6M OCT Sub- Group 15 subjects 20 subjects 9M Angio/IVUS 20 subjects 9M Angio/IVUS/OCT 30 subjects 24M Angio/IVUS/OCT 30 subjects 24M Angio/IVUS 20 subjects

RevElution Clinical Trial Trial Design OCT Imaging Cohort [N = 60] 9-Month OCT Subgroup [N = 30] 24-Month OCT Subgroup [N = 30] Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 1 Month [N = 15] Group 1 0 M 1 M 2 M 3 M 6 M No. Pts 60 15 15 15 15 30 30 1. Magnitude of neointimal hyperplasia formation NIH area / volume NIH thickness Volume obstruction 3 Months [N = 15] Group 3 9 M 2 Months [N = 15] Group 2 6 Months [N = 15] Group 4 Early Mid-term Very Late OCT Endpoints 2. Strut-level assessment Coverage Apposition 24M 3. Tissue type characterization Normal NIH PLIA Neoatherosclerosis

RevElution Clinical Trial OCT Results Cross Section Level 1 Month Follow Up N = 6 patients N = 7 lesions N = 8 stents Analyzed Stent Length, mm 21.66 ± 9.41 Total number of analyzed cross-sections 258 Cross-Sections Analyzed Per Scaffold 36.86 ± 16.12 Mean reference lumen area, mm 2 7.43 ± 1.69 Mean reference lumen diameter, mm 3.24 ± 0.44 Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

RevElution Clinical Trial OCT Results Strut level Post-Procedure N = 5 patients N = 6 lesions N = 7 stents 1 Month Follow Up N = 6 patients N = 7 lesions N = 8 stents Total number of analyzed struts 2,891 3,099 Frequency of covered struts per lesion, % Frequency of malapposed struts per lesion, % Mean NIH thickness over covered struts, mm --- 89.84 ± 5.06 P-value N/A 4.85 ± 2.99 2.03 ± 2.73 0.002 --- 0.06 ± 0.02 N/A Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

Frequency (%) per lesion RevElution Clinical Trial OCT Results 1 Month Follow Up Strut coverage NIH thickness 100 89.8 1 80 60 0.5 40 20 0 Covered struts 2.0 Malapposed struts 0 0.06 NIH thickness (mm) Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

Frequency of Covered Struts per Lesion (%) RevElution Clinical Trial Frequency of Covered Struts Per Lesion 89.8 A univariable logistic GEE model of occurrence of thrombus in a stent section versus RUTSS shows that there is a considerable elevation of risk of thrombus as the RUTSS increases. 1 (RUTSS) = variable ratio of uncovered to total struts per section 70.0 Medtronic DFS In a stent with 30% uncovered struts (70% covered), the odds ratio for thrombus is 9.0 (95% CI, 3.5 to 22.0) compared with a stent with complete coverage 1 1 Circulation. 2007;115:2435-2441 Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

Case 20001-002 Post-Procedure Age (n) 65 Gender (M/F) M Diabetes (Y/N) Y Hypertension (Y/N) Y Diameter stenosis (%) 75 RVD (mm) 3.5 Lesion Length (mm) 10 Pre-Dilatation Performed (Y/N) Stents Implanted (n) 1 Y 1-Month Follow-up 0.6 mm 2 mm 8 mm 10 mm 18 mm Smooth circular NIH Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

Diameter stenosis (%) 90 Case 20013-002 Age (n) 60 Post-Procedure Gender (M/F) Diabetes (Y/N) Hypertension (Y/N) F Y (ID) Y RVD (mm) 3.0 Lesion Length (mm) 16 Pre-Dilatation Performed (Y/N) Stents Implanted (n) 2 Y 1-Month Follow-up 0.6 mm 14 mm 17 mm 17.8 mm 42.2 mm Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

Case 20013-002 Early (1M) Healing of Overlapping Struts Daniel Chamié, MD Interventional Cardiologist, Institute Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology Director, OCT Core Laboratory, Cardiovascular Research Center Sao Paulo, Brazil

RevElution Clinical Trial Conclusions The 1M OCT data from the RevElution Clinical Trial (N = 6 patients; 8 stents) demonstrates an early healing profile with high rates of strut coverage of approx. 90% at 1 month. Additionally, the data also show a high efficacy profile as attested by low NIH formation. The low malapposition seen post-procedure was effectively halved within 1 month giving evidence to rapid healing At 1 M the NIH area was 0.49 mm 2, percent obstruction 5.82% and NIH thickness: 0.06mm Additional datasets at later timepoints will provide valuable information to further confirm these early results.