Mechanical assessment by magnetocytometry of the cytosolic and cortical cytoskeletal compartments in adherent epithelial cells

Similar documents
ROLE OF DEFORMATION-INDUCED LIPID TRAFFICKING IN THE PREVENTION OF PLASMA MEMBRANE STRESS FAILURE

Linda Lowe Krentz Bioscience in the 21 st Century October 22, 2010

(d) are made mainly of lipids and of proteins that lie like thin sheets on the membrane surface

Cell Adhesion and Reorganization in Tumour Growth Modelling. Luigi Preziosi calvino.polito.it/~preziosi

Muscle Dr. Ted Milner (KIN 416)

Molecular Cell Biology - Problem Drill 20: Cytoskeleton and Cellular Mobility

Structures in Cells. Cytoplasm. Lecture 5, EH1008: Biology for Public Health, Biomolecules

CELL BIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH CELL JUNCTIONS AND TISSUES.

Enormous progress has been made in terms of identifying

Microtubule Teardrop Patterns

Structures in Cells. Lecture 5, EH1008: Biology for Public Health, Biomolecules.

2.785j/3.97J/BEH.411/HST523J. UNIT CELL PROCESSES Contraction, Migration, and Actin-Myosin Mechanisms Responsible for Generating Force

Human height. Length of some nerve and muscle cells. Chicken egg. Frog egg. Most plant and animal cells Nucleus Most bacteria Mitochondrion

HOMEWORK RUBRICS MECHANOTRANSDUCTION UNIT: HOMEWORK #1 (20 pts towards your grade)

APPLICATION SPECIFIC PROTOCOL ANGIOGENESIS... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 MONOLAYER FORMATION... 2 OPTION 1: APPLICATION OF ANGIOGENIC STIMULI...

Lecture #15. Energy of transformation of one molecule is ~ktln(p e /S e ) ktln(p e /10S e ) = =ktln10=2.3kt

Author s Accepted Manuscript

Supporting Information for. Uptake of poly(2-hydroxypropylmethacrylamide)-coated gold nanoparticles

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Equations governing the probability n(x,t) that a cross-bridge is attached

A TOUR OF THE CELL 10/1/2012

Name: Per/row: Cell Structure and Function Practice: Use Ch 4 in Mader Biology

Chapter 6: A Tour of the Cell. 1. Studying Cells 2. Intracellular Structures 3. The Cytoskeleton 4. Extracellular Structures

1. Studying Cells. Concepts of Microscopy 11/7/2016. Chapter 6: A Tour of the Cell

In vitro scratch assay: method for analysis of cell migration in vitro labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)

CMB621: Cytoskeleton. Also known as How the cell plays with LEGOs to ensure order, not chaos, is temporally and spatially achieved

Organelles of the Cell & How They Work Together. Packet #7

Mechanotransduction in Ischemic Cardiac Tissue: A Mechanical Bidomain Approach under Plane Stress

Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol Materials Research Society

Cell Structure and Function

The cytoskeleton and cell movement. (Actin microfilaments)

Smallest living unit Most are microscopic

(a) TEM of a plasma. Fimbriae. Nucleoid. Ribosomes. Plasma membrane. Cell wall Capsule. Bacterial chromosome

1.2 introduction to the cell. me239 mechanics of the cell. 1.2 introduction to the cell. 1.2 introduction to the cell.

Topic 7b: Biological Membranes

Nucleic acids. Nucleic acids are information-rich polymers of nucleotides

cell movement and neuronal migration

Organelles of the Cell & How They Work Together. Packet #5

Lectures 18: Biological Membranes: Life in Two Dimensions (contd.)

Soft tissue biomechanics

Lecture Series 4 Cellular Membranes. Reading Assignments. Selective and Semi-permeable Barriers

Cell Overview. Hanan Jafar BDS.MSc.PhD

Organelles of the Cell & How They Work Together. Packet #5

5 CHAPTER 5: UTILIZATION OF OCT SETUPS FOR MEASUREMENT OF BIREFRINGENCE AND ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF BREAST TISSUES AND FOR MONITORING GROWTH DYNAMICS

The Golgi Apparatus: Shipping and Receiving Center. The Golgi apparatus. Functions of the Golgi apparatus. Lysosomes: Digestive Compartments

Microfilaments. myosin. In muscle cells. Microfilaments. Microfilaments. Video: Cytoplasmic Streaming. amoeboid movement. Pseudopodia.

Cytology. Light microscopy resolving power Electron microscopy TEM SEM Cell fractionation Ultracentrifuges

A Tour of the Cell. Chapter 7

Science & Technologies

Cell membranes. Stef Elorriaga 4/11/2016 BIO102

Stretching Cardiac Myocytes: A Finite Element Model of Cardiac Tissue

Early scientists who observed cells made detailed sketches of what they saw.

5/12/2015. Cell Size. Relative Rate of Reaction

A. Major parts 1. Nucleus 2. Cytoplasm a. Contain organelles (see below) 3. Plasma membrane (To be discussed in Cellular Transport Lecture)

Muscle Tissue- 3 Types

Ch. 6 Tour of the Cell

Renáta Schipp Gergely Berta Department of Medical Biology

AlN/ZnO/Silicon Structure Combining Surface Acoustic Waves and Waveguiding Layer Acoustic Wave

Supplementary Table 1: Motor-clutch gene mrna expression Myosin Motors

Phospholipids. Extracellular fluid. Polar hydrophilic heads. Nonpolar hydrophobic tails. Polar hydrophilic heads. Intracellular fluid (cytosol)

Introduction to Biomedical Engineering

CHAPTER 4 A TOUR OF THE CELL

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Lecture Series 4 Cellular Membranes

ORGANELLES OF THE ENDOMEMBRANE SYSTEM

Human Epithelial Cells

Plasma Membrane. comprised of a phospholipid bilayer and embedded proteins separates the cells s contents from its surroundings

Sodium and cell rigidity

Cell Biology Monographs

Muscle-Tendon Mechanics Dr. Ted Milner (KIN 416)

Ch 2: The Cell. Goals: Anatomy of a typical cell Cell Membrane Discussion of internal structure of a cell with emphasis on the various organelles

Active Response of Smooth Muscle and Arterial Tissue to Stenting

Cell Structure and Function

Chapter 4: Cell Structure and Function

Mitosis vs. microtubule

CELL PARTS TYPICAL ANIMAL CELL

Subcellular biochemistry

of an untreated HS-stained BAEC monolayer viewed using a laser confocal microscope; Bar = 10 µm.

Eukaryotic cell. Premedical IV Biology

Lecture Series 4 Cellular Membranes

Biophysical Analysis of Membrane Functions by Laser Tweezers

Frictional and Biomechanical Forces and Biological Effects of a Trapezoidal Versus Rectangular Bracket

Transport and Concentration of Charged Molecules in a Lipid Membrane

Supplementary Material

were isolated from the freshly drawn blood of healthy donors and ACS patients using the

basic unit structure and function

Actin structure. Actin a highly conserved gene. Molecular Cell Biology

Lecture 5- A Tour of the Cell

NOTES: Chapter 6 STRUCTURE OF THE CELL

Biological motion. Motorproteins. Common features of motorproteins. Molecular mechanisms of biological motion. Structural homology

The Cell Organelles. Eukaryotic cell. The plasma membrane separates the cell from the environment. Plasma membrane: a cell s boundary

What Are Cell Membranes?

Lecture 13 - Intermediate filaments

Cell Structure and Function. Biology 12 Unit 1 Cell Structure and Function Inquiry into Life pages and 68-69

Structure and Function of Cells

CISBIC Subproject 2: How one cell eats another - experiments and modelling elucidate early signalling events and biophysical requirements for uptake.

Grading of Vertebral Rotation

Chapter 4: Cell Structure and Function

A Tour of the Cell. Chapter 6. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Biology is the only subject in which multiplication is the same thing as division

Transcription:

Biorheology 40 (2003) 235 240 235 IOS Press Mechanical assessment by magnetocytometry of the cytosolic and cortical cytoskeletal compartments in adherent epithelial cells Valérie M. Laurent, Emmanuelle Planus, Redouane Fodil and Daniel Isabey Unité de Recherche de Physiopathologie et Thérapeutique Respiratoires INSERM Unité 492, Faculté de Médecine Paris XII, 8 rue du Général Sarrail, 94010 Créteil Cedex, France Abstract. This study aims at quantifying the cellular mechanical properties based on a partitioning of the cytoskeleton in a cortical and a cytosolic compartments. The mechanical response of epithelial cells obtained by magnetocytometry a micromanipulation technique which uses twisted ferromagnetic beads specifically linked to integrin receptors was purposely analysed using a series of two Voigt bodies. Results showed that the cortical cytoskeleton has a faster response ( 1 s) than the cytosolic compartment ( 30 s). Moreover, the two cytoskeletal compartments have specific mechanical properties, i.e., the cortical (resp. cytosolic) cytoskeleton has a rigidity in the range: 49 85 Pa (resp.: 74 159 Pa) and a viscosity in the range 5 14 Pa.s (resp.: 593 1534 Pa.s), depending on the level of applied stress. Depolymerising actin-filaments strongly modified these values and especially those of the cytosolic compartment. The structural relevance of this two-compartment partitioning was supported by images of F-actin structure obtained on the same cells. 1. Introduction The cytoskeleton (CSK) of adherent cells is a complex yet organized structure, whose mechanical properties are recognized as a key determinant for cell shape and cellular function [3,5]. Different types of polymeric network and cytoskeletal organization have already been described, but their exact role and contribution in the cellular mechanical response remain to be studied [1,4]. In the present study, we basically consider the two following CSK compartments: (i) an elastic cortical CSK network (e.g., actin ankyrin spectrin network) associated with the plasma membrane, (ii) a tensed cytosolic CSK network comprising microfilament-microtubule-intermediate filaments that links large regions of the cytoplasm. We used a newly developed two-compartment model of the CSK response, i.e., two Voigt bodies in series, to analyze data obtained with the magnetic twisting cytometry technique, leading to a specific quantification of the mechanical properties of the cortical and cytosolic CSK networks. By principle [9], the magnetic twisting cytometry allows to apply a predetermined stress to the CSK, due to RGD-coated beads specifically linked to transmembrane integrin mechanoreceptors. Noteworthy, the proposed concept which consists of dividing the cytoskeleton into a cortical and a cytosolic compartments, not only provides a better adjustment of the mechanical response in twisted cells, but also suggests that mechanical differences (presently quantified) associated to the structural specificity (presently assessed by 3D F-actin reconstruction) of each compartment, could play a key role to understand the functional response of living adherent cells. * Address for correspondence: Valérie M. Laurent, Laboratoire de Biomécanique et Biophysique Cellulaire, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Bat-SG-AA-B, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 21 693 83 47; Fax: +41 21 693 83 30; E-mail: valerie.laurent@epfl.ch. 0006-355X/03/$8.00 2003 IOS Press. All rights reserved

236 V.M. Laurent et al. / Mechanical assessment of the cytoskeletal compartments 2. Materials and methods 2.1. The cellular micromanipulation technique The CSK mechanical response of adherent epithelial cells was assessed by magnetocytometry using a device similar to the one previously described by Wang et al. [9]. The original technique uses RGDcoated ferromagnetic microbeads (4.5 µm in diameter) with a laboratory-made magnetic twisting device which allows application of controlled mechanical stresses directly to cell-surface through integrin transmembrane receptors and hence to the CSK. The bead deviation, which reflects the CSK response to mechanical stresses, was measured by an on-line magnetometer. A549 human alveolar epithelial cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were plated at a concentration of 50000 cells/well for 24 hours in bacteriologic dishes (96-well) which were previously coated with fibronectin. A 20-min incubation of RGD-coated microbeads with cells allowed to bind beads on cell-surface. A brief 0.15 T-magnetic pulse was applied to magnetize all surface bound beads in a unique direction. Then, a magnetic torque applied on the bead, was created by a much weaker vertical uniform magnetic field B tw during 60 seconds (B tw 6.3 mt). To determine the magnitude of bead rotation θ, a magnetometer continuously detected the component of the remanent magnetic field in the horizontal plane. It was assumed that the average bead deviation could be approximated by the arc-cosine of the projected magnetic field averaged over all beads ( 200,000). Typically, the time course of bead rotation magnitude shows a rapid augmentation of θ followed by a slower evolution of θ toward plateau suggesting that stability has been reached. This time course of this angular deviation was analyzed by a two-compartment rheological model, given to represent the cortical and the cytosolic CSK responses. This two-compartment analysis provided a much better curve fitting (see Fig. 1) than the previously used single compartment model [6,9 11]. 2.2. Definition of the model The two-compartment model consists of a series of two Voigt bodies representing the basic viscoelastic properties of the two CSK compartments (see Fig. 2). The CSK compartment with the fastest mechanical response, was logically assumed to be the CSK network located the closest from the bead, and was called Fig. 1. Typical curve of bead rotation angle θ (in degrees) versus time (in seconds) during the application of a magnetic torque of about 1000 pn µm, i.e., a mechanical stress of 24 Pa in Table 1 (black curve) and the fitting curve of the theoretical equation of the two-compartment model (grey curve).

V.M. Laurent et al. / Mechanical assessment of the cytoskeletal compartments 237 Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the rheological basis of the proposed two-compartment CSK model. the cortical CSK compartment. By contrast, the slower CSK compartment which was logically assumed to be located the farthest from the bead, was called the cytosolic network. The choice of placing the two CSK compartments in series was guided by the observation that the local actin CSK surrounding the bead seemed to be connected to the deeper also more polymerised CSK filaments (see Results section). This choice means an infinitely rigid connection between these two CSK networks and an overall bead displacement equal to the sum of displacements for each compartment. Then, the time course of bead deviation θ(t) obtained during magnetocytometry was considered to fit the following equation: θ(t) = a 1 ( 1 e t/τ 1 ) + a2 ( 1 e t/τ 2 ), (1) where a 1 and a 2 are the magnitudes and τ 1 and τ 2 are the time constants of the cortical and cytosolic CSK compartments, respectively. The stiffness E 1 (resp. E 2 ) of cortical (resp. cytosolic) CSK network was obtained from the ratio of σ 0 and a 1 (resp. a 2 ); σ 0 is the mechanical stress applied at the onset of the twist (equal to the ratio of initial magnetic torque modulus to bead volume). The viscosity η 1 (resp. η 2 ) of cortical (resp. cytosolic) CSK network was obtained from the product of the stiffness E 1 (resp. E 2 ) and time constant τ 1 (resp. τ 2 ), divided by 3. To evaluate the effect of changing intracellular conditions on the mechanical behaviour of two CSK compartements, we measured the mechanical response in cells treated or not treated with low concentrations of cytochalasin D (1 µg/ml). Cytochalasin D is an F-actin-depolymerizing drug that we have already used in the aim of reducing internal tension in adherent cells [11]. To study the attachment of the bead to the actin cytoskeleton, we stained F-actin with fluorescent phallotoxin as previously described [11]. Then, the F-actin organization of some epithelial cells was visualized by a laser confocal microscopy using a LSM 410 microscope (Zeiss, Rueil-Malmaison, France). Optical sections were recorded every 1 µm to reveal intracellular fluorescence. The distribution of the actin cytoskeleton in the cell was revealed by a cumulative view from basal to apical optical planes. Reconstruction of F-actin contours was performed using an adapted imaging systems involving commercially available softwares (AMIRA R 2.1, Tgs Inc., CA and 3D-Studio Max R v3.1, Kinetix, CA) [2].

238 V.M. Laurent et al. / Mechanical assessment of the cytoskeletal compartments (a) (b) Fig. 3. Images of F-actin organization in some epithelial cells which include microbead specifically attached to integrin receptors on their apical surface. (a) Cumulative view from basal to apical optical planes obtained by confocal microscopy, (b) reconstruction of F-actin contours using optical planes. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Structural assessment The structural shape of the cytoskeleton both in the vicinity of attached beads and in the entire cell was characterized from the F-actin organisation. The latter was assessed by the planar optical layers describing fluorescent density. Figure 3(a) shows the cumulative view of F-actin organization from basal to apical plane. Although beads were not specifically labelled for fluorescence, the local organization of the F-actin network around every bead is clearly visible and forms an annular (or semi-spherical) structure embedding part of the bead and apparently connected to denser, i.e., more polymerising F- actin filaments, likely pertaining to the cytosolic CSK. The visualization of F-actin contours shown in Fig. 3(b) indicates that the cortical actin CSK is connected to the bead via a local annular (or semispherical) network on which the cytosolic network seems to be directly connected. These microscopic observations of the actin CSK tend to support the basic assumption of the model, i.e., the overall bead displacement reflects the additive and specific contribution of two compartments which are connected in series, with the cortical CSK closer from the bead than the cytosolic CSK, as shown in Fig. 2. 3.2. Mechanical assessment The mechanical properties of the two CSK compartments were determined for four different values of mechanical stress i.e. 10, 18, 24 and 30 Pa (see Table 1). The results show that, at any applied stress, values of stiffness and viscosity related to the cytosolic CSK network were always higher than those values related to the cortical CSK. Moreover, in the range of stress values tested, the stiffness of the cytosolic CSK network increased from 74 to 159 Pa, while the stiffness of the cortical CSK network only increased from 49 to 85 Pa (see Table 1). These higher rigidity values observed for the cytosolic compartment are associated to a more pronounced stiffening response of the cytosolic CSK network compared to the cortical CSK network. These results agree with a higher degree of polymerisation of

V.M. Laurent et al. / Mechanical assessment of the cytoskeletal compartments 239 Table 1 Mechanical properties of the two CSK compartments for 4 different mechanical stress values and assuming beads half immersed in the cytoplasm Mechanical stress Cortical network Cytosolic network (Pa) Stiffness Viscosity Time Stiffness Viscosity Time (Pa) (Pa.s) constant (s) (Pa) (Pa.s) constant (s) 10 49 ± 4 5± 1 0.3 ± 0.1 74± 8 593 ± 102 23 ± 2 18 60 ± 4 12± 1 0.7 ± 0.1 125 ± 10 1049 ± 151 25 ± 4 24 64 ± 4 14± 1 0.7 ± 0.1 159 ± 6 1534 ± 99 30 ± 3 30 85 ± 6 11± 1 0.4 ± 0.1 158 ± 10 758 ± 82 14 ± 1 p<0.05 for difference from the cortical network value at matched mechanical stress value; results are presented as means ± SE and n = 8 wells for each result. (a) (b) Fig. 4. Plots of the stiffness versus the applied mechanical stress for: (a) the cortical network and (b) the cytosolic network. Untreated cells correspond to black curve and cytochalasin D-treated cells correspond to grey curve. p<0.05 for difference from the value for untreated cells at matched mechanical stress value; results are presented as means ± SE and n = 8 wells for each result. the cytosolic CSK network compared to the cortical. The viscosity of the cytosolic CSK network, ranges from 600 to 1600 Pa s and was one or two orders of magnitude greater than the viscosity of the cortical CSK network, which ranged from 5 to 15 Pa s. These results demonstrate that the two cytoskeletal compartments have very different viscoelastic behaviours. The cytosolic CSK network which is characterized by a complex and spatially interconnected networks of cross-linked filaments (actin, tubulin and intermediate filaments) appears to be a much more viscous structure likely due to a much higher number of polymeric interconnections. By contrast, the cortical CSK network (e.g., actin ankyrin spectrin network) associated with the plasma membrane which should not contain microtubules nor intermediate filaments while having a lesser polymerised F-actin network, has a much smaller viscosity. In summary, high rigidity and viscosity values observed for the cytosolic CSK network are consistent with the crosslinking between highly polymerised filaments, such as the actin bundles called stress fibers which are thought to reinforce the cell against external mechanical stresses [7,10]. The higher viscosity values of the cytosolic network could be due to the energy dissipated in friction at the junction between filaments and within the cytosol, which is known to exhibit a very high viscosity [8]. To confirm the above conclusions, we tested the effect on the mechanical properties of each compartment of a depolymerising drug (cytochalasin D) in the culture medium. For mechanical stress values of 10, 18, 24 and 30 Pa, actin filament depolymerization decreases the cytosolic CSK network stiffness by

240 V.M. Laurent et al. / Mechanical assessment of the cytoskeletal compartments 49%, 46%, 49% and 40%, respectively, while the cortical CSK network stiffness is decreased by only 49%, 39%, 30% and 33%, respectively. These results show that, for the whole range of stress values tested, the stiffness of the treated cytosolic CSK network is considerably reduced and that this reduction is more pronounced than the one observed for the treated cortical CSK network (Fig. 4(a) and (b)). Stiffening response of the cytosolic and cortical CSK network is also reduced in these depolymerized cells (Fig. 4(a)), with however a less marked effect for the cortical CSK network (Fig. 4(b)). The present results confirm the basic assumptions of the model, i.e., the cytosolic CSK network is a highly polymerized structure while the cortical CSK network is less polymerized. In other words, for the cortical CSK network, the internal tension generated by actin filaments and stress fibers might not be the primary mechanism responsible for stiffness of the cortical CSK structure. The stability of such planar or spherical structure might indeed differ in terms of geometry and internal tension from the stability of a spatially highly tensed structure. 4. Conclusion In conclusion, we consider that the present study, performed on adherent epithelial cells, provides convincing arguments to support the idea that the mechanical response of the cytoskeleton can be divided into a faster, softer, fluidified and therefore moderately polymerized cortical CSK compartment and a slower, stiffer, solidified and highly polymerized cytosolic CSK compartment. References [1] A.S. DePina and G.M. Langford, Vesicle transport: the role of actin filaments and myosin motors, Microsc. Res. Tech. 47 (1999), 93 106. [2] R. Fodil, V.M. Laurent, S. Eddahibi, S. Wendling, E. Planus and D. Isabey, Parallel assessment of the 3D-actin structure and mechanical properties of cytoskeleton in twisted living adherent cells, Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 108 (2000), 168. [3] D.E. Ingber, D. Prusty, Z. Sun, H. Betensky and N. Wang, Cell shape, cytoskeletal mechanics, and cell cycle control in angiogenesis, J. Biomech. 28 (1995), 1471 1484. [4] P.A. Janmey, The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling, Physiol. Rev. 78 (1998), 763 781. [5] T.J. Mitchison and L.P. Cramer, Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion, Cell 84 (1996), 371 379. [6] J. Pourati, A. Maniotis, D. Spiegel, J.L. Schaffer, J.P. Butler, J.J. Fredberg, D.E. Ingber, D. Stamenovic and N. Wang, Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells?, Am.J.Physiol.274 (1998), C1283 1289. [7] R.L.J. Satcher and C.F.J. Dewey, Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton, Biophys. J. 71 (1996), 109 118. [8] M. Sato, D.P. Theret, L.T. Wheeler, N. Ohshima and R.M. Nerem, Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties, J. Biomech. Eng. 112 (1990), 263 268. [9] N. Wang, J.P. Butler and D.E. Ingber, Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton, Science 260 (1993), 1124 1127. [10] N. Wang and D.E. Ingber, Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension, Biophys. J. 66 (1994), 2181 2189. [11] S. Wendling, E. Planus, V.M. Laurent, L. Barbe, A. Mary, C. Oddou and D. Isabey, Role of cellular tone and microenvironment on cytoskeleton stiffness assessed by tensegrity model, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Physics 9 (2000), 51 62.