RESPONSE OF DEKALB CORN PRODUCTS TO POPULATION

Similar documents
THE RIGHT SEEDS. THE RIGHT PROTECTION.

ADVANCING CORN YIELDS. Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate

2017 ILeVO Trial Harvest Report

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

Agronomy Notes Vol 30, No EARLY MATURING VARIETIES AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODES: WILL THIS MARRIAGE WORK?

Fertility Management for Corn on Corn Systems Kyle Freeman. The Mosaic Company

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

COMPARISON OF IMPREGNATED DRY FERTILIZER WITH S AND ZN BLENDS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

2018 Herbicide x Variety Guide

Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

2007 PERFORMANCE OF WINTER BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) AND SPRING WAXY BARLEY VARIETIES PLANTED IN THE FALL

Monsanto s s Pipeline for Biotech Crops. Vice President, Consumer Traits Monsanto Company

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

INSECTICIDE EFFICACY TRIAL FOR THRIPS CONTROL IN DRY BULB ONIONS

Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

2011 Early Season Foliar Fungicide Timing Trial on Corn

Funding for this research was provided by the Nebraska Soybean Board.

SOIL PH IN RELATION TO BROWN STEM ROT AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE N.C. Kurtzweil 1, C.R. Grau 2, A.E. MacGuidwin 3, J.M. Gaska 4, and A.W.

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

Murray State Theses and Dissertations

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

Research Report Forage Sorghum Hybrid Yield and Quality at Maricopa, AZ, 2015

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

Nutrient Recommendations Agronomic Crops Last Updated 12/1/16. Grain Corn. Crop Highlights Target ph: 6.0

Wednesday February 12, 2014 Managing P and Zn

Using Tissue and Soil Tests Together Helps Make Better Decisions. John Lee Soil Scientist AGVISE Northwood, ND

Nutrient management irrigated corn. Jim Camberato

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Soil Amendments on Black Bean Yield 2014

Fertility management in soybean

Comparison of Ammonia Volatilization from Surface Applied Fertilizers on High, Neutral, and Low ph Soils

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Phosphate, Done Better BENEFITS

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2009

2015 Forage Brassica Variety Trial

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Biomass and Meal on Black Bean Yield

Field Notes July 24, 2009 Johnny Saichuk

Results and Discussion

STALK COLD TOLERANCE OF COMMERCIAL SUGARCANE VARIETIES DURING THE HARVEST SEASON

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

Industrial Hemp Registration Application Complete registrations are due by May 1 st, annually

2017 Vegetable Fertility Management Trial

High Value Soybean Composition

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

M. S. ZUBER A. J. KEASTER N. G. WEIR C. F. STARK P. J. LOESCH, JR. January,1970

Nitrogen additives: What is what, and do they work?

Result Demonstration Report

HERE ARE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR CUSTOMERS MOST OFTEN ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT Calcium-25

Effects of Harvest Date and Late-Summer Fertilization Rate on Stockpiled Bermudagrass Forage Mineral Concentrations

Roses with Vitazyme application

Soybean seed quality response among maturity groups to planting dates in the Midsouth. Larry C. Purcell & Montserrat Salmeron

WELCOME MYCOGEN SEEDS UPDATE

Nitrogen Management Effects on Tuber Yield, Quality, and Acrylamide Content of Five Processing Cultivars

Final Report 2015 Field Demonstrations of Sorghum Forages for the California Dairy Industry

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

REPORT TO THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION December 2010 Project Title: Management of Fusarium

Pest Management in Organic Soybeans-Paul Hunter and Wayne Wangness Farms-2002

AgriCal by. Healthier Soils Stronger Plants Higher Yields

Survey of Insecticide Use in Sugarbeet in Eastern North Dakota and Minnesota Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports.

Miguel S. Castillo Juan J. Romero Yuchen Zhao Youngho Joo Jinwoo Park

Secondary and Micronutrients

Agronomic In-Service Training

Rot. Sheath. Black. Lodging. Smut. False. Smut. Kernel. Stem Rot MS R MS S. Leaf S. Brown. Narrow. Blight. Panicle. Bacter. head. Straigh.

Patented ECO-FERTILIZER. Soil AMENDMENT. Nitrogen REPLACEMENT

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode with the Soil Test and Crop Rotation

2013 Flax Variety Trial

Introduction to Wolf Trax

Professional Greenhouse Water Soluble Fertilizers

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

Structure of the EU Regulation for Organic Farming

Almond Nitrogen Nutrition

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

A COMPARISON OF FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY IN A SIMULATED GRAZE-OUT FOR TWELVE VARIETIES OF HARD RED AND WHITE WINTER WHEAT

Potassium Deficiency in Cotton Early Detection and Alleviation

NUTRITION KNOW-HOW P.O. BOX 897 // WILLMAR, MN (800) // WCDST.COM

5/23 6/26 6/30 7/21 CONCLUSIONS

INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS OF POOR SUGARBEET AREAS. D.W. Franzen, D.H. Hopkins, and Mohamed Khan North Dakota State University INTRODUCTION

Variability in Tissue Testing What Does It Mean For Nutrient Recommendations?

2017 HEARTLAND BANK CORN TRIALS

2012 Summer Annual x Fertility Rate Trial

Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Evaluation of Manganese Fertility of Upland Cotton in the Lower Colorado Valley

Final Report of the. (HB 151, Chapter 17:1, Laws of 2018) October 16, Membership. Rep. Peter W. Bixby, Clerk Rep. Howard Pearl.

Plant Water Relations: Irrigation Advice Directly From the Tree. Ken Shackel, UCD Plant Sciences August 4, 2009

Lime Fertilizer Interactions Affecting Vegetable Crop Production' Delbert D. Hemphill, Jr., and T. L. ABSTRACT

Burt Bluhm Department of Plant Pathology University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

NEW YORK and VERMONT CORN SILAGE HYBRID TRIALS 2017

Irrigation Management In Rice. Matthew Rhine University of Missouri

Evaluation of Assail for the Control of Early Season Cotton Aphids in Upland Cotton COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT 2001

Corn Silage Hybrids for Best Performance. Joe Lauer University of Wisconsin. Lauer, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

Transcription:

RESPONSE OF DEKALB CORN PRODUCTS TO POPULATION 2016 Learning Center Demo Report Monsanto Learning Center at Scott, MS BACKGROUND A demonstration was established to evaluate the response of new DEKALB brand corn products to different plant populations. The objective of this demonstration was to provide information about new DEKALB brand corn products to help growers with the following questions: If I increase the plant population, will the yield potential increase? Do higher plant populations lead to an increase in lodging? Response of DEKALB Corn Products to Population

STUDY GUIDELINES 10 DEKALB brand corn products were planted on March 29, 2016 with the following conditions: Soil Type: Commerce silt loam Previous Crop: Cotton Tillage: Conventional Nitrogen: 240 lbs N/acre All other agronomic practices were standard for local conditions. Each product was planted at populations of 32,000, 36,000, 40,000, and 44,000 seeds/acre. Ear samples were harvested to help understand the flex characteristics of five different corn products. Ears from 10 row feet of each plot were harvested. 240 Response of DEKALB Corn Products to Different Plant Populations 220 (bu/a) Average Yield ( 180 160 140 120 DKC62-20 DKC62-08 DKC63-60 DKC66-75 DKC66-97 DKC67-14 DKC67-72 DKC68-26 DKC69-31 DKC70-27

Most DEKALB corn products responded favorably to plant populations in the range of 36,000 seeds/acre. Two DEKALB corn brands, DKC70-27 and DKC67-14, demonstrated a significant lodging risk when planted at higher populations. Recommend not planting above 36,000 seeds/acre. The remaining eight DEKALB corn products appear to have the ability to stand at higher populations and may be safely planted in high input systems at higher populations. 240 Response of DEKALB Corn Products to Different Plant Populations 220 Average Yield (b bu/acre) 180 160 140 120 DKC66-97 DKC67-14 DKC67-72 DKC68-26 DKC70-27

Response of DEKALB Corn Product Ear Size to Different Plant Populations 250 Grams/ Ea ar 150 50 0 DKC66-97 DKC67-14 DKC67-72 DKC68-26 DKC70-27 In general, ear size decreased as population increased. DEKALB corn brands DKC70-27 and DKC67-14 may have more ear flex in response to changes in growing environment and available resources, which can be an advantage as lower populations are recommended for these two corn brands.

TAKE AWAYS It is important to consider local data based on individual corn products to help determine the most favorable plant population for your farm. In general, the corn products in this demonstration performed well at 36,000 seeds/acre. Corn ear size tends to decrease as population increases. It is recommended to plant higher populations of corn products with a more fixed ear. Corn products with more ear flex can be planted in lower populations due to the ability to produce larger ears. Both approaches have high yield potential and will depend on grower preferences and growing conditions. LEGAL STATEMENTS The information discussed in this report is from a single site, non-replicated demonstration. This information piece is designed to report the results of this demonstration and is not intended to infer any confirmed trends. Please use this information accordingly. Individual results may vary, and performance may vary from location to location and from year to year. This result may not be an indicator of results you may obtain as local growing, soil and weather conditions may vary. Growers should evaluate data from multiple locations and years whenever possible. Always read and follow IRM, where applicable, grain marketing and all other stewardship practices and pesticide label directions. Asgrow and the A Design, DEKALB and Design and DEKALB are registered trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC. Deltapine is a registered trademark of Monsanto Company. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2016 Monsanto Company. 161025114658 110416MEC