Neurobehavioral disturbances constitute an important

Differential Effects of L-Dopa and Subthalamic Stimulation on Depressive Symptoms and Hedonic Tone in Parkinson s Disease Karsten Witt, M.D. Christine Daniels, M.D. Jan Herzog, M.D. Delia Lorenz, M.D. Jens Volkmann, M.D. Julia Reiff, M.D. Maximilian Mehdorn, M.D. Günther Deuschl, M.D. Paul Krack, M.D. Patients with Parkinson s disease frequently have mild to moderate depression and exhibit low hedonic tone. The authors investigate the impact of a single L-dopa challenge and the acute effects of electric stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on symptoms of depression and hedonic tone. Depressive symptoms improved with L-dopa and STN stimulation to the same extent. However, hedonic tone improved only with L-dopa. Most of the emotional changes did not correlate with changes in motor performance, indicating they were not just reactive but specific to the treatment. These results demonstrate a single dissociation of depressive symptoms and anhedonia in response to an acute L-dopa and STN-stimulation challenge. (The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 26; 18:397 1) Neurobehavioral disturbances constitute an important aspect in the spectrum of clinical manifestations of Parkinson s disease. 1,2 Thirty-eight percent of Parkinson s disease patients develop depression according to DSM-IV criteria. 3 Anhedonia, the inability to experience pleasure, is a typical feature of major depression, but it is also frequently associated with Parkinson s disease. The prevalence of anhedonia in Parkinson s disease patients is 7% to %, but low hedonic tone is not always related to depressive mood in Parkinson s disease.,5 Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves off-period motor functions in Parkinson s disease. 6 Several reports have described behavioral abnormalities in Parkinson s disease patients after DBS. 6 1 The interpretation of these longitudinal studies that examined patients before and after implantation of STN electrodes for DBS is complex. Behavioral problems might be the consequence of a post-operative decrease in dopaminergic medication and, therefore, might reflect the loss of psychotropic effects of the medication. Or, the reported changes in mood might be the result of specific effects of the STN stimulation itself. The goal of the present study was to investigate the effects of acute changes in STN stimulation and L-dopa on signs and symptoms of depression and on hedonic tone. METHOD We examined 15 Parkinson s disease patients (three women, 12 men, mean age of 57 years) before and 3 months after bilateral electrode implantation in the subthamamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation. All patients suffered from advanced Parkinson s disease (mean disease duration of 15 years [SD.8 years]). Their Hoehn and Yahr ratings raged from 2.5 to (mean 2.97 [SD.35]). None of them exhibited dementia (Mattis Dementia Rating Scale score 13). 11 The patients had quadripolar stimulating electrodes chronically implanted, as previously described. 12 Dopaminergic drugs were compared for dopa-equivalent dosages. 6 Patients received an average L-dopa equivalent Received June 3, 25; revised October 11, 25; accepted December 26, 25. Drs. Witt, Daniels, Herzog, Lorenz, Volkmann, and Deuschl are affiliated with the Department of Neurology, University Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. Dr. Reiff is affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie, Kiel, Germany. Dr. Mehdorn is affiliated with the Department of Neurosurgery, University Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. Dr. Krack is affiliated with the Department of Clinical and Biological Neurosciences, Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France. Address correspondence to Dr. Witt, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Department of Neurology, Schittenhelmstrasse 1, D-215 Kiel, Germany; k.witt@neurologie.unikiel.de (E-mail). Copyright 26 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 18:3, Summer 26 http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org 397

daily dosage of 915 mg before surgery and 9 mg 3 months after surgery. At the time of testing, the stimulation characteristics were as follows: monopolar stimulation, mean pulse width 6 lsec, average frequency 11 Hz, and mean stimulation voltage 3.2 V. The protocol was approved by the local ethical committee at Kiel University, and all patients gave informed consent. Pre-operatively, a Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) motor score was accorded in a medication-off condition following a 12-hour overnight withdrawal of dopaminergic medication, and in a medicationon condition after the intake of an L-dopa dose. We chose the L-dopa dose according to the individual amount necessary to induce an optimal motor response during preoperative clinical testing. Three months after electrode implantation, the L-dopa challenge was repeated in four combinations, always in the same chronological order: 1) medication off/stimulation off after a drug-free interval of 12 hours overnight; 2) medication off/stimulation on; 3) medication on/stimulation off using the same dose of L-dopa as pre-operatively; and ) medication on/stimulation on. The neurological examination (UPDRS III) and the psychiatric rating began 3 minutes after changing the drug to achieve a stable clinical status. We employed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 13 to rate symptoms of depression. The items were divided into 12 cognitive-affective (psychological) and nine somatic (physiological) symptoms, according to a model by Endler et al. 1 To assess hedonic tone, we administered the German version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), 15,16 a 1-item self-rating scale that covers four domains of hedonic experience: interest/pastimes, social interaction, sensory experience, and food/drink. Statistical Analysis We analyzed the UPDRS III data of the pre-operatively performed L-dopa testing by using a Wilcoxon test because the data showed no normal distribution. We analyzed the post-operative results of the UPDRS III and the self-rating scales using separate Wilcoxon tests because the data either showed no normal distribution (UPDRS III) or came from ordinal-scaled self-rating tests (e.g., BDI, SHAPS). To assess the effect of stimulation and medication, respectively, the comparison of the values UPDRS III, BDI cognitive-affective items, BDI somatic items and SHAPS were analyzed separately in the conditions stimulation off/medication off versus stimulation on/medication off, and stimulation off/medication off versus stimulation off/medication on. We analyzed the additive effect of stimulation and medication by testing the conditions stimulation off/medication on versus stimulation on/medication on (additive effect of stimulation), and the conditions stimulation on/medication off versus stimulation on/ medication on (additive effect of medication). Furthermore, we calculated correlations between cognitive/affective and somatic items of the BDI and SHAPS and between psychiatric and motor changes (UPDRS III) (Spearman correlation analysis, 2-tailed). The level of significance was set at.5. RESULTS UPDRS Motor Score A comparison of the preoperative motor changes with L-dopa showed a significant decrease of the UPDRS III after the single L-dopa challenge (Z 3.1, p.1). Post-operatively, the Wilcoxon test demonstrated a significant effect of medication (Z 3., p.1) and stimulation (Z 3., p.1) and a significant additive effect of medication (Z 3., p.1) and of stimulation (Z 2., p.) (Figure 1). Total Score of the BDI There was a significant effect of medication (Z 2.8, p.5) and stimulation (Z 3.2, p.1). Furthermore, the Wilcoxon test showed a significant additive effect of medication (Z 2.1, p.3) and a significant additive effect of stimulation (Z 2., p.). Cognitive Affective Items of the BDI There was a significant effect of medication (Z 2.7, p.6) and stimulation (Z 3.1, p.2). Moreover, there was a significant additive effect of medication (Z 2., p.) and a significant additive effect of stimulation (Z 2., p.) (Figure 1). Somatic Items of the BDI Statistical tests showed no significant effect of Mmdication (p.53) and stimulation (p.2) and no additive effect of medication (p.13) and stimulation (p.28) (Figure 1). SHAPS-D There was a significant effect of medication (Z 2.3, p.2) on the score of SHAPS, but no significant effect for stimulation (p.26) and a significant additive effect of medication (Z 2.3, p.2), but no significant additive effect of stimulation (p.7) (Figure 1). 398 http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 18:3, Summer 26

WITT et al. Correlation Analysis Between Motor and Mood Changes Spearman s rho revealed a significant correlation between motor changes due to medication and stimulation (q.69, p.5). Furthermore, there was a single significant correlation between motor changes related to the medication and changes in the global BDI score caused by medication (q.57, p.28). All other correlations between motor and neuropsychiatric scores were insignificant. to imagine how their present mood state could affect the somatic items sleep or appetite, for example. On the other hand, acute significant changes were detected in the cognitive-affective items of the BDI and the SHAPS. This shows that these self-ratings are sensitive to rapid mood changes. This observation weakens the claim that the BDI scale is inflexible and not able to detect acute changes in the emotional state. Previous studies used other self-rating scales on the basis of visual analogue scales. 18,19 To avoid multiple DISCUSSION Whereas both L-dopa and STN stimulation had significant effects on motor signs and on depressive symptoms as measured by the BDI, only L-dopa significantly improved the hedonic tone measured by the SHAPS. These positive effects on mood in our study are in line with previous studies, demonstrating psychotropic effects of both L-dopa and STN stimulation. 17 STN stimulation, although improving motor symptoms to the same extent as L-dopa, showed no effect on the hedonic tone. The correlation analysis of motor and neuropsychiatric data showed only a positive correlation between the change in motor score change and the change of the BDI global score. The lack of any further correlation, especially the change in the cognitive affective items and the motor score due to stimulation and due to medication, argues against relevant interdependence of emotional and motor domains in this patient group. Both medication and stimulation led to comparable improvements in motor function. If a simple improvement of motor functions induced a reactive improvement in depressive symptoms, then one would expect correlations between motor and neuropsychiatric data after STN stimulation as well. There are some limitations to our study: the BDI assesses past depressive symptoms, usually over the past 7 days, and might be inadequate for detecting rapid changes in mood. Although our study indicates that BDI is indeed sensitive to acute changes in mood, this finding will need to be replicated in an independent sample. As the BDI contains somatic items, changes in BDI may not reflect true changes in mood but rather may translate improvement in somatic items, such as improved sleep or appetite, secondary to changes in motor signs. Therefore, we decided to split the BDI items into cognitive-affective and somatic items. The somatic items did not change significantly in the acute setting. When patients answer the BDI questions, it might be difficult FIGURE 1. UPDRS III BDI Cognitive Affective Items BDI Somatic Items Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale 6 2 12 8 12 8 3 2 1 Motor and Neuropsychiatric Performance of Parkinson s Disease Patients Receiving L-Dopa and Subthalamic Stimulation Off drug On drug Off Stimulation On Stimulation The four bars show data in the four post-operative conditions: medication off/stimulation off, medication on/stimulation off, medication off/stimulation on, and medication off/stimulation on. Significant differences with a level p.5 J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 18:3, Summer 26 http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org 399

analyses of visual analogous scales we evaluated three combinations of BDI scores and one SHAPS score. As a result, we favor grouping several items of one aspect of mood to get a more robust value. The second limitation refers to the point that a single L-dopa challenge might be more effective than STN-DBS in the chronic stimulation setting. We chose the L-dopa dose according to the individual amount necessary to induce an optimal motor response during pre-operative clinical testing, but the effects of a single suprathreshold L-dopa dose and chronic parameters of STN-DBS in the motor domain are comparable. Therefore, it seems plausible that the absence of an effect of STN-DBS on the hedonic tone is not simply related to the amplitude of the stimulation parameters. The third limitation points to the fact that we did not randomize the post-operative conditions of stimulation and medication. In the light of this limitation, one must discuss possible carryover effects from one condition to the other. Such a carryover effect is likely, analyzing the additive effect of STN-DBS after the significant change in hedonic tone due to L-dopa. Referring to the main result of the study (STN-DBS improves depression assessed by the BDI, but has no effect on anhedonia assessed by the SHAPS, whereas L-dopa decreases both BDI and SHAPS scores), carryover effects are not critical because the stimulation-on setting was compared with the stimulation-off setting before L-dopa was administered. Here significant STN-DBS effects were only detectable by the BDI. The fourth limitation refers to the interval of 3 minutes, which passes after changing the stimulation and medication condition. Half an hour might be too short a period to detect all changes induced by STN-DBS or medication. Two previous studies examining the emotional domain showed that the changes due to STN stimulation were evident after intervals of 3 minutes. Furthermore, P.E.I.T studies demonstrated a significant change in cerebral oxygen metabolism after a similar interval of stimulation onset in the anterior cingulate cortex, which is involved in emotional processing. 2,21 Regarding the different effects of L-dopa and STN- DBS on depressive symptoms and anhedonia, the different physiological mechanisms of both methods must be taken into consideration. L-dopa restores phasic activity of midbrain dopamine neurons necessary for the identification of primary rewards. 22 STN-DBS is supposed to suppress the pathological neuronal activity of the parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus. 23 The limbic territory of the STN is indirectly connected with the anterior cingulate cortex, which shows a hypometabolism in depressed patients suffering from Parkinson s disease. 2 Both L-dopa 25 and STN-DBS lead to a significant activation of the anterior cingulate cortex. The effect of L- dopa, in contrast, is more diffuse and involves additional mesolimbic-cortical pathways projecting from the ventral tegmental area to the limbic parts of the basal forebrain. Dopaminergic medication, therefore, is likely to have larger action, which may explain the dissociation of the effects of STN-DBS and L-dopa on mood and hedonic tone. STN-DBS seems to mimic partly the psychotropic effects of L-dopa, but does not fully replicate the motivational effects of dopaminergic stimulation. These results might also be relevant for the post-operative clinical management of Parkinson s disease patients. References 1. Lauterbach EC, Freeman A, Vogel RL: Differential DSM-III psychiatric disorder prevalence profiles in dystonia and Parkinson s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2; 16:29 36 2. Lauterbach EC: The neuropsychiatry of Parkinson s disease and related disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2; 27:81 825 3. Aarsland D, Larsen JP, Lim NG, et al: Range of neuropsychiatric disturbances in patients with Parkinson s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 67:92 96. Pluck GC, Brown RG: Apathy in Parkinson s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 22; 73:636 62 5. Isella V, Iurlaro S, Piolti R, et al: Physical anhedonia in Parkinson s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23; 7:138 1311 6. Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, et al: Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson s disease. N Engl J Med 23; 39:1925 193 7. Herzog J, Reiff J, Krack P, et al: Manic episode with psychotic symptoms induced by subthalamic nucleus stimulation in a patient with Parkinson s disease. Mov Disord 23; 18:1382 138 8. Houeto JL, Mesnage V, Mallet L, et al: Behavioural disorders, Parkinson s disease and subthalamic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 22; 72:71 77 9. Krack P, Kumar R, Ardouin C, et al: Mirthful laughter induced by subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Mov Disord 21; 16:867 875 1. Saint-Cyr JA, Trepanier LL, Kumar R, et al: Neuropsychological consequences of chronic bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson s disease. Brain 2; 123(Pt 1):291 218 11. Mattis S: Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, Fla, Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, 1988 12. Schrader B, Hamel W, Weinert D, et al: Documentation of electrode localisation. Mov Disor 22; 17(suppl 3):167 17 13. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; :561 571 http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 18:3, Summer 26

WITT et al. 1. Endler NS, Rutherford A, Denisoff E: Beck Depression Inventory: exploring its dimensionality in a nonclinical population. J Clin Psychol 1999; 55:137 1312 15. Snaith RP, Hamilton M, Morley S, et al: A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone: the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 167:99 13 16. Franz M, Lemke MR, Meyer T, et al: [German version of the Snaith-Hamilton-pleasure scale (SHAPS-D). Anhedonia in schizophrenic and depressive patients] Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1998; 66:7 13 17. Funkiewiez A, Ardouin C, Krack P, et al: Acute psychotropic effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation and levodopa in Parkinson s disease. Mov Disord 23; 18:52 53 18. Maricle RA, Nutt JG, Valentine RJ, et al: Dose-response relationship of levodopa with mood and anxiety in fluctuating Parkinson s disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 1995; 5:1757 176 19. Schneider F, Habel U, Volkmann J, et al: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus enhances emotional processing in Parkinson disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 23; 6:296 32 2. Hilker R, Voges J, Weisenbach S, et al: Subthalamic nucleus stimulation restores glucose metabolism in associative and limbic cortices and in cerebellum: evidence from a FDG-PET study in advanced Parkinson s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2; 2:7 16 21. Limousin P, Greene J, Pollak P, et al: Changes in cerebral activity pattern due to subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidum stimulation in Parkinson s disease. Ann Neurol 1997; 2:283 291 22. Schultz W: Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2; 1:199 27 23. Garcia L, Audin J, D Alessandro G, et al: Dual effect of highfrequency stimulation on subthalamic neuron activity. J Neurosci 23; 23:873 8751 2. Ring HA, Bench CJ, Trimble MR, et al: Depression in Parkinson s disease: a positron emission study. Br J Psychiatry 199; 165:333 339 25. Buhmann C, Glauche V, Sturenburg HJ, et al: Pharmacologically modulated fmri cortical responsiveness to levodopa in drug-naive hemiparkinsonian patients. Brain 23; 126(Pt 2): 51 61 J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 18:3, Summer 26 http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org 1