Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel Therapy and CV Outcomes after PCI: A Time-Dependent Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the GRAVITAS trial

Similar documents
Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel Therapy and CV Outcomes after PCI: A Time-Dependent Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the GRAVITAS trial

Disclosures: Matthew J. Price, MD

Do We Need Platelet Function Assays?

Optimal Duration and Dose of Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI

Δοκιμασίες λειτουργικότητας αιμοπεταλίων και PCI

Measurement of Antiplatelet Therapeutic Efficacy

Speaker s name: Thomas Cuisset, MD, PhD

Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on the Effect of High- and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clopidogrel Response Variability and Platelet Function Testing: Should Routine Practice Be Changed in Interventional Cardiology?

New insights in stent thrombosis: Platelet function monitoring. Franz-Josef Neumann Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΩΝ. Εξατοµικευµένη αντιαιµοπεταλιακή αγωγή. Ποιο είναι το µέλλον?

Pragmatic Trial Design to Study Health Policy Interventions: Lessons Learned from ARTEMIS Tracy Y. Wang, MD, MHS, MSc, FACC, FAHA

Clopidogrel Use in ACS and PCI: Clinical Trial Update

Affordability and Real-world Antiplatelet Treatment Effectiveness After Myocardial Infarction Study

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial

Roxana Mehran, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Ron Waksman, Joseph M. Sweeny, Ganesh Raveendran, Renli Teng, Yonggang Zhao, Glenn Carlson NCT

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Platelet function testing to guide P2Y 12 -inhibitor treatment in ACS patients after PCI: insights from a national program in Hungary

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Surveying the Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management

10-Year Mortality of Older Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated in U.S. Community Practice

GENNARO SARDELLA MD, FACC,FESC

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Antithrombotic therapy in the ACS patient with atrial fibrillation

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

Why and How Should We Switch Clopidogrel to Prasugrel?

Increasing Clopidogrel Based on CYP2C19 Genotype in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

Increasing Clopidogrel

and Ticagrelor Professor of Medicine (Cardiology), Georgetown University Associate Director, Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

What hematologists should know about VerifyNow

Proton Pump Inhibitors increase Cardiovascular risk in patient taking Clopidogrel

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE

Risk of GI Bleeding and Use of PPIs

P2Y 12 blockade. To load or not to load before the cath lab?

Study objectives. Study design. Patient population

Low Dose Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 Inhibition, in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1)

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in PCI/ACS. Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC Director of Cardiovascular Research Assistant Professor of Medicine

Cilostazol: Triple Benefits More is Better!

ISAR-CHOICE 2. Randomized Trial of 75 mg vs 150 mg of Daily Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing PCI

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Disclosures. Theodore A. Bass MD, FSCAI. The following relationships exist related to this presentation. None

Μιχάλης Χαμηλός, MD, PhD, FESC

Stent Thrombosis Importance of Pharmacotherapy

PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia study

Optimal lenght of DAPT in different clinical scenarios

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

Using DOACs in CAD Patients in Sinus Ryhthm Results of the ATLAS ACS 2, COMPASS and COMMANDER-HF Trials

Ticagrelor vs prasugrel in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Stable CAD, Elective Stenting and AFib

Is Cangrelor hype or hope in STEMI primary PCI?

Thrombosis Research active studies

Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation:

Changing Course: Anticoagulation in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Events

In patients with cardiovascular disease, antiplatelet medications

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

2018 National Oncologists Workforce Study OCTOBER 2018

Clinical Controversies in Perioperative Medicine

2. If prasugrel is found to be both more costly and more effective than clopidogrel, to assess its costeffectiveness

Point-of-Care Genetic Testing for Tailored Anti-Platelet Therapy Ready for Prime Time?

Antiplatelet Therapy: how, why, when? For Coronary Stenting

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

Decline in CV-Mortality

Controversies in PCI A young cardiologist s perspective

Session Objectives. Clopidogrel Resistance. Clopidogrel (Plavix )

The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System

GRAND ROUNDS - DILEMMAS IN ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY. Nick Collins February 2017

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Retaking NPTE

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

COAGULATION, BLEEDING, AND TRANSFUSION IN URGENT AND EMERGENCY CORONARY SURGERY

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

Robert Storey. Sheffield, United Kingdom

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Dual Oral Antiplatelet Therapy for ACS: Improving Standards of Care to Optimize Outcomes

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Dr Αντώνιος Στ. Ντάτσιος MSc, MRCP(UK), FESC. Επεμβατικός Καρδιολόγος Επιμελητής Β Γ. Ν. Θ. Παπαγεωργίου

תרופות מעכבות טסיות חדשות ד"ר אלי לב מנהל שרות הצנתורים ח השרון מרכז רפואי רבין

Prasugrel: Son of Clopidogrel or Distant Cousin? Disclosures. Objectives

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Quale terapia antiaggregante nello STEMI? Prasugrel vs ticagrelor

Personalized Antiplatelet Therapy: State of the Art

Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for PCI Pharmacology: Role of Bivalirudin in High-Risk PCI

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Impact of Resting Heart Rate on Mortality, Disability and Cognitive Decline in Patients after Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Antiplatelet Therapy: Current Recommendations for Choice of Agent and Concurrent Therapy with Warfarin and Novel Oral Anticoagulants

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

UPDATES FROM THE 2018 ANTIPLATELET GUIDELINES

MULTIcentre evaluation of Single high-dose. acute myocardial infarction study

State of the Art in the ACS Atrial Fibrillation Overlap Syndrome

Recognizing the High Risk NSTEMI Patient for Early Appropriate Therapy

Ischemic and bleeding risk stratification in NSTE ACS. Andrzej Budaj Postgraduate Medical School Grochowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland

Impact of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 SNPs on outcomes with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes: a PLATO genetic substudy

Transcription:

Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel Therapy and CV Outcomes after PCI: A Time-Dependent Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the GRAVITAS trial Matthew J. Price MD, Dominick J. Angiolillo MD, PhD, Paul S. Teirstein MD, Elizabeth Lillie PhD, Steven V. Manoukian MD, Peter B. Berger MD, Jean-François Tanguay MD, Christopher P. Cannon MD, and Eric J. Topol MD

Disclosures: Grant support: BMS/sanofi aventis, Accumetrics, Quest Diagnostics Honoraria/Consulting/Speaking fees: BMS/sanofi aventis, DSI/Lilly, AstraZeneca, Medicure

GRAVITAS Study Design Price MJ et al, JAMA 2011 Elective or Urgent PCI with DES* VerifyNow P2Y12 Test 12-24 hours post-pci N=5429 Yes PRU 230 No Normal On-treatment Reactivity High On-treatment Reactivity Random Selection N = 1109 N = 1105 N = 586 High-Dose Clopidogrel clopidogrel 600-mg, then clopidogrel 150-mg/day Standard-Dose Clopidogrel clopidogrel 75-mg/day Standard-Dose Clopidogrel clopidogrel 75-mg/day Primary Efficacy Endpoint: CV Death, Non-Fatal MI, Stent Thrombosis at 6 mo Pharmacodynamics: Repeat VerifyNow P2Y12 at 1 and 6 months *Peri-PCI clopidogrel per protocol-mandated criteria to ensure steady-state at 12-24 hrs placebo-controlled All patients received aspirin (81-162mg daily)

Primary Endpoint: CV Death, MI, Stent Thrombosis Observed event rates are listed; P value by log rank test. Price MJ et al, JAMA. 2011;305(11):1097-1105

Secondary Comparison: High vs. Not High Reactivity Treated with Clopidogrel 75-mg daily Observed event rates are listed. P value by log-rank test. Price MJ et al, JAMA. 2011;305(11):1097-1105

GRAVITAS: Pharmacodynamics PD effect of study drug in pts with high OTR CV Events in Pts Treated with 75 mg In patients with high on-treatment reactivity (OTR) after PCI, there was substantial variability over time in the pharmacodynamic responses to study drug. Patients with low levels of OTR after PCI appeared to have few (if any) CV events. Price MJ, AHA 2010

GRAVITAS: Objective of Time-Varying Analysis The objective of this analysis was to explore the relationship between on-treatment platelet reactivity over the course of the GRAVITAS trial and the risk of subsequent CV events.

Methods All 3 study arms were pooled given lack of clinical efficacy in the overall trial. High on-treatment reactivity (OTR) was defined as: OTR > 230 PRU (pre-specified) OTR > 208 PRU (post-hoc, based on data available after GRAVITAS began enrolling) Primary Endpoint: CV death, MI, and ST

Statistical Methods Cox proportional hazards regression used to test associations between predefined cut-offs and outcomes, using OTR as a time-varying covariate (measured 12-24 hrs and 30 days after PCI). Models built for the association between: OTR and outcome at 60 days (ie, 30 days after the 1 month follow-up platelet function test) OTR and outcome at 6 months (end of follow-up) Multivariate time-dependent Cox regression used to adjust for clinical and procedural characteristics associated with outcome.

Patient Flow: On-Treatment Reactivity (OTR) Over The Course of GRAVITAS 2796 Patients (99.9%) Eligible for Analysis Baseline (12-24 hrs) 501 with OTR <208 PRU 2295 with OTR 208 PRU 588 with OTR <230 PRU 2208 with OTR 230 PRU 30±7 days 1156 with OTR <208 PRU 1397 pts OTR 208 PRU 1448 with OTR <230 PRU 1105 pts OTR 230 PRU 4 patients (0.1%) lost to follow-up

On-Treatment Reactivity As A Time-Varying Covariate: Unadjusted Hazard of CV death, MI, and ST 60 days HR [95% CI] P value PRU <230 0.62 (0.25, 1.51) 0.30 PRU <208 0.18 (0.04, 0.79) 0.02 6 months 0.01 0.1 1 10 Hazard Ratio HR [95% CI] P value PRU <230 0.71 (0.41, 1.23) 0.22 PRU <208 0.43 (0.23, 0.83) 0.01 0.1 1 10 Hazard Ratio

Clinical and Procedural Characteristics Associated With CV Death, MI, and ST at 60 days: Multivariate Analysis HR [95% CI] P PRU <208 ACS Diabetes Stent Length (per mm) Prior MI Beta Blocker CrCl <60 Prior PCI Prior CABG 0.23 [0.05, 0.98] 0.047 3.95 [1.83, 8.53] <0.001 2.49 [1.10, 5.64] 0.028 1.01 [1.01, 1.02] 0.003 2.16 [0.94, 4.93] 0.068 1.27 [0.42, 3.85] 0.668 1.48 [0.69, 3.18] 0.668 1.76 [0.74, 4.16] 0.201 1.92 [0.87, 4.23] 0.108 0.01 0.1 1 10 Hazard Ratio *On-treatment reactivity treated as a time-varying covariate CrCl = creatinine clearance, ACS = acute coronary syndrome, MI = myocardial infarction

Clinical and Procedural Characteristics Associated With CV Death, MI, or ST at 6 Months: Multivariate Analysis HR [95% CI] P PRU <208 ACS Diabetes Stent Length (per mm) Prior MI Beta Blocker CrCl <60 Prior PCI Prior CABG 0.54 [0.28, 1.04] 0.065 2.04 [1.18, 3.53] 0.011 2.48 [1.42, 4.35] 0.002 1.01 [1.01, 1.02] 0.001 1.86 [1.06, 3.28] 0.031 2.12 [0.89, 5.05] 0.090 1.52 [0.89, 2.57] 0.123 1.45 [0.81, 2.61] 0.209 1.80 [1.04, 3.11] 0.037 0.1 1 10 Hazard Ratio *On-treatment reactivity treated as a time-varying covariate CrCl = creatinine clearance, ACS = acute coronary syndrome, MI = myocardial infarction

Achieved Levels of On-Treatment Reactivity at 30-Days Stratified By Randomized Treatment Arm 100 % of patients achieving target level at 30 days 80 60 40 20 25.8 48.4 37.9 60.1 Standard-Dose High-Dose 0 <208 PRU <230 PRU HD group, CV events according to PRU <208: HR 0.48 [95%CI, 0.18 to 1.25], P=0.14

Limitations Power to detect significant associations between OTR and clinical outcomes was reduced by: Skewed distribution of population (GRAVITAS by design enrolled and followed more patients with high OTR than lower levels of OTR) Lower-than-expected event rates Underpowered to detect clinical efficacy of high-dose clopidogrel according to achieved platelet reactivity. Analysis using cut-off of 208 PRU was post-hoc Supporting data for this cut-off after enrollment began Assessing a single additional cut-off minimizes risk of a chance finding

Conclusions In GRAVITAS, patients who achieved ontreatment reactivity (OTR) <208 PRU at 12 to 24 hours after PCI or during follow-up had a significantly lower risk of subsequent CV events, even after adjustment for other characteristics. Supports the prognostic utility of serial platelet function testing Provides further support for the and ACCF/AHA 2011 guideline recommendations

Conclusions Less than half of the patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel 150 mg daily achieved this level of OTR. Supports hypothesis that an insufficient pharmacodynamic response may have contributed to the lack of observed clinical effect Alternative individualized strategies to improve patient outcomes after PCI merit further consideration.

The GRAVITAS investigators (Top 40 of 83) D. Spriggs (Clearwater, FL) S. Marshalko (Bridgeport, CT) S. Puri (Moline, IL) R. Waksman (Washington, DC) M. Robbins (Nashville, TN) C. O'Shaughnessy (Elyria, OH) P. Teirstein (La Jolla, CA) E. Fry (Indianapolis, IN) K. Garratt (New York, NY) D. Angiolillo (Jacksonville, FL) O. Bertrand (Quebec, QC) B. McLaurin (Anderson, SC) M. Stillabower (Newark, DE) S. Rao (Durham, NC) J. Aragon (Santa Barbara, CA) R. Gammon (Austin, TX) E.D. Nukta (Fairview Park, OH) Z. Jafar (Poughkeepsie, NY) J.F. Tanguay (Montreal, QC) G. Wong (Sacramento, CA) A. Abbas (Troy, MI) D. Cohen (Kansas City, MO) T. Mann (Raleigh, NC) J. Robb (Lebanon, NH) W. Batchelor (Tallahassee, FL) M. Lucca (Duluth, MN) P. Gordon (Providence, RI) S. Ward (Erie, PA) M. Schweiger (Springfield, MA) D. Rizik (Scottsdale, AZ) M. Amine (Tomball, TX) J. Wang (Baltimore, MD) P. Berger (Danville, PA) R. Minutello (New York, NY) N. Chronos (Atlanta, GA) E. Mahmud (San Diego, CA) D. So (Ottawa, ON) P.K. Cheung (Edmonton, AB) R. Stoler (Dallas, TX) M. Fugit (Sacramento, CA)

Available online now at http://circ.ahajournals.org/ Circulation. 2011;124:1132-1137