NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE QUALITY AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK (QOF) INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Similar documents
QOF indicator area: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD)

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM AND UNIVERSITY OF YORK HEALTH ECONOMICS CONSORTIUM (NICE EXTERNAL CONTRACTOR) Health economic report on piloted indicator

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM AND UNIVERSITY OF YORK HEALTH ECONOMICS CONSORTIUM (NICE EXTERNAL CONTRACTOR) Health economic report on piloted indicator

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE QUALITY AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK (QOF) INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME. Indicator Assessment Report

Quality and Outcomes Framework Programme NICE cost impact statement July Indicator area: Osteoporosis - fragility fracture

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre and University of York Health Economics Consortium (NICE External Contractor)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

POTENTIAL LINKAGES BETWEEN THE QUALITY AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK (QOF) AND THE NHS HEALTH CHECK

2. Quality and Outcomes Framework: new NICE recommendations

How effective are national strategies for getting evidence into practice?

Costing report: Lipid modification Implementing the NICE guideline on lipid modification (CG181)

Putting NICE guidance into practice. Resource impact report: Hearing loss in adults: assessment and management (NG98)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

West and South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Commissioning Support Unit. QIPP Programmes CKD QIPP

OHTAC Recommendation: Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertension. Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee

Putting NICE guidance into practice. Resource impact report: ifuse for treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain (MTG39)

Commissioning for value focus pack

New indicators to be added to the NICE menu for the QOF and amendments to existing indicators

Vascular checks a vascular risk assessment and management. Heather White Deputy Branch Head Vascular Programme

Putting NICE guidance into practice. Resource impact report: Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management (NG80)

Optimising Hypertension Management Clair Huckerby Pharmaceutical Adviser- Medicines Optimisation Lead

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE. How can we do better?

NICE Indicator Programme. Consultation on proposed amendments to current QOF indicators

Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s NICE quality standard

Estimated number of people with hypertension. Significantly higher than the. Proportion. diagnosed with. hypertension

Cardiovascular disease profile

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO QOF 2014/15 - ENGLAND CLINICAL

Hypertension Profile. NHS High Weald Lewes Havens CCG. Background

Trends and Variations in General Medical Services Indicators For Hypertension: Analysis of QRESEARCH Data

Primary hypertension in adults

Delivering NDPP in a super diverse population

CQC Insight. NHS GP practices Indicators and methodology

NICE BHS Hypertension guidelines 2011 update

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

The National Quality Standards for Chronic Kidney Disease

Developing Key Messages on Cancer for Commissioners

Appendix J: Cost-effectiveness analysis blood pressure monitoring for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension (new 2011)

Appendix J: Cost-effectiveness analysis blood pressure monitoring for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension (new 2011)

GOVERNING BODY REPORT

Guideline scope Hypertension in adults (update)

Four Years of NHS Health Checks in Barnsley - Outcomes and Inequalities

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO QOF 2017/18 - ENGLAND CLINICAL

17/18 Threshold 18/19 Points 18/19. Points NO CHANGE NO CHANGE NO CHANGE

Psychosis & Schizophrenia: The Updated NICE Quality Standard. Dr Tony Gill Mental Health Practitioner University of Leeds 7 th June 2015

MPharmProgramme. Hypertension (HTN)

NHS England Impact Analysis of implementing NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme, 2016 to 2021

University of Birmingham and University of York Health Economics Consortium (NCCID) Development feedback report on piloted indicators

Developing Key Messages on Cancer for Commissioners

FINANCE COMMITTEE DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND AGEING POPULATION INQUIRY SUBMISSION FROM NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS SOCIETY

Hypertension Clinical case scenarios for primary care

Challenges of CVD Prevention in Primary Care

Commissioning for Better Outcomes in COPD

14/15 Threshold 15/16 Points 15/16. Points. Retired Replaced by NM82/AF007. Replacement NO CHANGE

Royal Crescent Surgery

Summary of 2012/13 QOF Changes

Costing Report: atrial fibrillation Implementing the NICE guideline on atrial fibrillation (CG180)

Map 6: Percentage of people in the National Diabetes Audit (NDA) with Type 1 diabetes receiving all nine key care processes by PCT

Proof of Concept: NHS Wales Atlas of Variation for Cardiovascular Disease. Produced on behalf of NHS Wales and Welsh Government

Cardiology The interface between Primary and Secondary Care

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

University of Birmingham and University of York Health Economics Consortium (NCCID) Development feedback report on piloted indicators

Coronary heart disease and stroke

National Chronic Kidney Disease Audit

OCCG SERVICE SPECIFICATION (2018/19) Improving Physical Health in Patients with a Severe Mental Illness

Progress in improving cancer services and outcomes in England. Report. Department of Health, NHS England and Public Health England

2015/16 General Medical Services (GMS) contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)

Resource impact report: Sofosbuvir velpatasvir for treating chronic hepatitis C TA430

Time Series Analysis for selected clinical indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework

That the Single Commissioning Board supports the project outlined in this report and proceeds as described.

QOF (England): clinical indicators

Lipid Lowering in patients with High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease (Primary Prevention)

NHS England Getting Serious About Prevention

Number of people with diabetes

Dr Diana R Holdright. MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC, MBBS, DA, BSc. Consultant Cardiologist HYPERTENSION.

Diabetes education: the big missed opportunity in diabetes care? Phaedra Perry Regional Head South West Katherine Calder Senior Policy Officer

Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk. Costing report. Implementing NICE guidance

AHSN Business Case User Guide: Improving AF Identification and Optimising Management to Prevent AF-Related Stroke. Version: 13 March 2017

Community Based Diabetes Prevention

5.2 Key priorities for implementation

Business Case for COPD Local Enhanced Service. Distribution Seen prior to overall Gateway Sign-Off Date

Physical Health Checks

Cancer and Data in the New NHS May Di Riley, Director Clinical Outcomes

Survivorship Guidelines. September 2013 (updated August 2015)

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Putting NICE guidance into practice

GP Insight Report. Oaklands CQC ID:

Economic Impact Evaluation Case Study: AliveCor Kardia Mobile

Helping Smokers Quit Clinicians adding value from every contact by treating tobacco dependence

Guideline scope Subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured aneurysm: diagnosis and management

Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease opportunistic risk assessment pilot ( Heart MOT service) in community pharmacies

Summary of 2011/12 QOF indicator changes, points and thresholds

NHS QIS National Measurement of Audit Acute Coronary Syndrome

Is Traditional Clinic Blood Pressure Dead?

Local Improvement Scheme (LIS) 2016/17 Local Service for Dementia Care in East Lancashire GP Practices

Alcohol and Drug Commissioning Framework for Northern Ireland Consultation Questionnaire.

Healtheast CCG - developing an understanding of health and wellbeing needs. Public Health NHS Norfolk and Waveney Cluster and Norfolk County Council

Younger adults with a family history of premature artherosclerotic disease should have their cardiovascular risk factors measured.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE. Type 2 diabetes: the management of type 2 diabetes (update)

People living well with Dementia in the East Midlands: Improving the Quality of Care in Acute Hospitals

Integrated Diabetes Care in Oxfordshire -patient's perspective. Avril Surridge

Transcription:

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE QUALITY AND OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK (QOF) INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Cost impact statement: Hypertension QOF indicator area: Hypertension Date: July 2013 Indicator NM66: The percentage of patients with a new diagnosis of hypertension (diagnosed on or after 1 April 2014) which has been confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in the 3 months before entering on to the register Introduction This report covers 1 new indicator relating to hypertension. The indicator is part of the NICE menu of potential Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) indicators for 2014/15, following the recommendations of the independent QOF advisory committee in June 2013. The indicator has been piloted as part of the NICE QOF indicator development process. This report considers the likely cost impact of incentivising the interventions associated with the proposed indicator in terms of the number of additional interventions provided and the cost of each intervention. Costs to NHS commissioners are outlined where relevant, along with the cost of additional activity at general practices. The QOF currently incentivises GP practices to maintain a register of patients with established hypertension (HYP001, formerly BP1). The rationale for the new indicator is to achieve more accurate diagnosis of hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure QOF cost impact statement: Hypertension (July 2013) page 1 of 6

monitoring (HBPM) rather than clinic-based blood pressure monitoring (CBPM). This indicator is aligned to recommendation 1.2.3 in clinical guideline 127: hypertension, which states that, If the clinic blood pressure is 140/90 mmhg or higher, offer ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension. Cost implication Number of people affected The costing template for clinical guideline 127: hypertension estimates that the incidence of newly suspected hypertension for people aged 18 and over is 0.78% per annum. Current care The current QOF indicator CVD-PP002 (formerly PP2) incentivises lifestyle advice for people with newly diagnosed hypertension: CVD-PP002: The percentage of patients diagnosed with hypertension (diagnosed on or after 1 April 2009) who are given lifestyle advice in the preceding 12 months for: smoking cessation, safe alcohol consumption and healthy diet. The latest published QOF achievement data (2011/12) show that across all GP practices in England the level of achievement for PP2 (the predecessor indicator of CVD-PP002) was 81.5%. The indicator pilot considered the use of ABPM only HBPM was added to the indicator wording by the QOF advisory committee. The pilot shows that the majority of practices are monitoring blood pressure using ABPM, but not necessarily routinely and not for all people with newly suspected hypertension. The pilot also indicates that 78% of the 30 pilot practices have their own ABPM machines with the remainder able to refer to a local consortia commissioned service or secondary care. QOF cost impact statement: Hypertension (July 2013) page 2 of 6

Proposed care The indicator is expected to increase the proportion of people with suspected hypertension through CBPM who have the diagnosis confirmed by either ABPM or HPBM. ABPM costs more per test than both HBPM and CBPM because of the higher cost of the devices and the additional time needed to download results. ABPM is more accurate in identifying hypertension than CBPM and HBPM. This means that fewer people who are not hypertensive will be incorrectly diagnosed with hypertension (false positives). This results in fewer people being offered antihypertensive drugs, and cost savings to the NHS through lower expenditure on drugs and annual monitoring appointments with GPs. The costing template for clinical guideline 127: hypertension estimates the cost impact of recommendation 1.2.3, confirming hypertension with ABPM. Table 1 estimates cost of implementing the indicator using the assumptions in the costing template, including the savings expected through more accurate diagnosis. However as this was published in August 2011 some assumptions have been adjusted to reflect information provided in the pilot and cost of drugs currently. They include: current practice % of whose diagnosis was confirmed following CBPM, HBPM or ABPM, future practice % of whose diagnosis was confirmed following CBPM, HBPM or ABPM unit cost of antihypertensive drugs have been adjusted. Table 1 presents the cost impact in year 1 after implementation; to see the cost impact each year prior to year 5 refer to the clinical guideline costing template and change the assumptions to reflect adjustments in table 1. QOF cost impact statement: Hypertension (July 2013) page 3 of 6

Table 1 Estimated cost of implementing indicator NM66 after year 1 of implementation People aged between 18 and over 44,014,857 Annual Incidence of suspected hypertension 0.78% Number of people per annum with suspected hypertension 342,054 Current Practice Future Practice % whose diagnosis was confirmed following (CBPM) 75% 5% % whose diagnosis was confirmed following (HBPM) 5% 5% % whose diagnosis was confirmed following (ABPM) 20% 90% % who (ABPM) is not tolerated and have to use (HBPM) as a secondary diagnosis 5% 5% Total Number of people diagnosed as hypertensive 203,273 170,371 Number of newly diagnosed hypertensive people on antihypertensive drugs per annum (81.58%) 165,827 138,985 Unit Cost ( ) Units Current cost ( ) Units Future cost ( ) Cost of clinical blood pressure monitoring (CBPM) 38.00 256,541 9,748,558 17,103 649,914 Cost of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) 39.13 17,103 669,240 17,103 669,240 Cost of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) 53.40 68,411 3,653,147 307,849 16,439,137 Cost of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) after (ABPM) was not tolerated 39.13 3,421 133,864 15,392 602,289 Cost of monitoring appointment with GP 28.00 220,450 6,172,600 170,371 4,770,388 Cost of antihypertensive drugs - year of diagnosis 4.30 179,839 773,308 138,985 597,636 Cost of antihypertensive drugs - years following diagnosis 8.61 - - - - Total Cost - year 1 21,150,717 23,728,603 Change in diagnosis cost -year 1 4,155,770 Change in treatment cost - year 1-1,577,884 Net Resource impact - year 1 2,577,886 QOF cost impact statement: Hypertension (July 2013) page 4 of 6

Resource impact The resource impact of the implementation of indicator NM66 is estimated to be 2.58 million cost in year 1 using adjusted assumptions from the costing template for clinical guideline 127: hypertension and assuming that the recommendations in the guideline are not fully implemented currently. However, using the costing template it is estimated that diagnosing hypertension with ABPM will mean future savings due to the cumulative effect of accurate testing and the savings of prescribing more accurately antihypertensive drugs. Sensitivity analysis If we vary current practice assumptions on the percentage of people whose diagnosis was confirmed by the alternative methods to CBPM (65%), HBPM (5%) and ABPM (30%) the cost impact would be 2.21 million cost in year 1 after implementation. Assuming CBPM (85%), HBPM (5%) and ABPM (10%) the cost impact would be 2.95 million cost in year 1 after implementation. If we vary future practice assumptions on the percentage of people whose diagnosis was confirmed by the alternative methods to CBPM (10%), HBPM (5%) and ABPM (85%) the cost impact would be 2.39 million cost in year 1 after implementation. Assuming CBPM (1%), HBPM (5%) and ABPM (94%) the cost impact would be 2.71 million cost in year 1 after implementation. Conclusions The estimated initial cost impact of indicator NM66 is 2.58 million cost in year 1 after implementation. Using the costing template for clinical guideline 127: hypertension, it is estimated that diagnosing hypertension with ABPM will mean future savings due to the cumulative effect of accurate testing and the savings of prescribing more accurately antihypertensive drugs. QOF cost impact statement: Hypertension (July 2013) page 5 of 6

Related QOF indicators Current QOF indicator Numerator Denominator Underlying achievement (2011/12) PP2 (reworded as CVD-PP002 for 2013/14). The percentage of patients diagnosed with hypertension (diagnosed after 1 April 2009) who are given lifestyle advice in the preceding 15 months for: smoking cessation, safe alcohol consumption and healthy diet 730,857 896,616 81.5% CVD-PP002: The percentage of patients diagnosed with hypertension (diagnosed on or after 1 April 2009) who are given lifestyle advice in the preceding 12 months for: smoking cessation, safe alcohol consumption and healthy diet Not in QOF in 2011/12 Not in QOF in 2011/12 Not in QOF in 2011/12 References Health and Social Care Information Centre (2012) QOF 2011/12 data [online]. University of Birmingham (NICE External Contractor), Development feedback report on piloted indicator, 2013. University of Birmingham and University of York Health Economics Consortium (NICE External Contractor), Health economic report on piloted indicator, 2013 NICE costing template for clinical guideline 127: hypertension QOF cost impact statement: Hypertension (July 2013) page 6 of 6