ATN 110: An HIV PrEP Demonstration Project and Phase II Safety Study for Young Men who Have Sex with Men in the United States

Similar documents
The HIV Prevention Product Pipeline for Adolescents JANUARY 8 TH, 2018

Moving beyond condoms to prevent HIV transmission. Are you Prepared for HIV PrEP?

Important Safety Information About Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 200 mg/300 mg for HIV-1 Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

PrEP for Women: HIV Prevention in Family Planning Settings

The Science behind Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Yunus Moosa Department of Infectious Diseases UKZN

PrEP Initiative / Iniciativa PrEx

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis. Robert M Grant October 2014

Patterns and Correlates of PrEP Drug Detection among MSM and Transgender Women in the Global iprex Study

PrEP efficacy the evidence

Drug development in relation to PrEP and the PROUD study

PrEP Dosing Strategies

Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 200 mg/300 mg for HIV-1 Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Training Guide for Healthcare Providers

PrEP for HIV prevention. Pep Coll AIDS Research Institute-IrsiCaixa Fight AIDS Foundation BCN Checkpoint

Project ACCEPT: Acceptability of a behavioral intervention to promote engagement in care for youth newly diagnosed with HIV

PrEP in young African women: Rationale & lessons from HPTN 082

PrEP 201: Beyond the Basics

The role of Integrase Inhibitors during HIV prevention

PrEP and Behavioral Strategies for HIV Prevention. Douglas Krakower, MD January 30, 2014

HIV & THE MEDICAL HOME A NEW FRONT FOR GETTING TO ZERO. Brent K. Sugimoto, MD, MPH Kaiser Permanente. 29th Annual East Bay HIV Update June 3, 2016

Guidelines for Implementing Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis For The Prevention of HIV in Youth Peter Havens, MD MS Draft:

PREPARING FOR PrEP: SCIENCE, RESEARCH, AND ACCESS. September 29, :00 PM EST

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Infection

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Antiretroviral Drugs for HIV Seronegative People: It works in trials, what about the real world?

Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Epidemiology. Transmission. Risk of Transmission PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PREP) FOR HIV PREVENTION 50,000.

Faculty: Relationships with financial sponsors: Speakers Bureau/Honoraria: Advisory board/consulting Fees:

PrEP for HIV Prevention. Adult Clinical Guideline from the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention

UK community perspective on PrEP and PROUD. Simon Collins

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): Best Practices for Pharmacists

HIV & Condomless Sex - What is the Risk? Why Not? Alan J. Taege, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Department of Infectious Disease Cleveland Clinic

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Primary Care

HIV and the Young Adult. Laura Rachal, MD MS Tulane Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, PGY4 LAAP Potpurri Meeting August 19, 2018

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Stefanie La Manna, PhD, MPH, APRN, FNP-C, AGACNP-BC October 12, 2018

Cutting Edge and Interventions of Promote PrEP Adherence. Martin Hoenigl, MD; University of California San Diego

SFAF CLINICAL PROTOCOLS

HIV Prevention among Women

Pre exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): Stepping Up HIV Prevention

PREVENTION OF HIV IN THE TIMES OF PREP. Daniela Chiriboga, MD Florida Department of Health in Polk County

Pre-Sexual Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Incidence des IST chez les PrEPeurs

Important Safety Information About TRUVADA for a Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Indication. For Healthcare Providers

HIV. The Role of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the Prevention of HIV. Brief History of HIV AIDS. Global HIV Infection.

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Pros and Cons of on demand PrEP «Pros» Laurent COTTE, MD Infectious Diseases Department Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon - France

Case Studies in PrEP Management. Kevin L. Ard, MD, MPH Massachusetts General Hospital, National LGBT Health Education Center April 15, 2016

11/8/2016. Moving Beyond Truvada: The (Current) Future Pipeline for PrEP. Prevention Modalities

Pre-Exposure Topical Microbicides and Oral Prophylaxis Trials:

REVIEW OF PREP GUIDELINES: A PRIMER FOR THE PRIMARY CARE PRACTITIONER ANTONIO E. URBINA, MD. PrEP Webinar Series

Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases Professor of Medicine Weill Medical College of Cornell University New York City

PrEP in the Real World: Clinical Case Studies

PrEP adherence in Black MSM in HPTN 073 and Beyond

Dominic Chow, MD, PhD, MPH, Hawaii Center for AIDS Kunane Dreier, Prevention, Life Foundation Kekoa Kealoha, Hawaii Island HIV/AIDS Foundation Alexis

PrEP Integration into Primary Care

ART for HIV Prevention:

11/7/2016. Jeanne M. Marrazzo, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama

How Do You Like Your PrEP?

during conception, pregnancy and lactation at 2 U.S. medical centers

TAKING A HISTORY OF SEXUAL HEALTH: OPENING THE DOOR TO EFFECTIVE HIV AND STI PREVENTION

Getting Prepped for PrEP. Ken Ho, MD, MPH World AIDS Day

PrEP in young African women: Rationale & lessons from HPTN 082 (and other studiesp

Ready, set, PrEP! Renee-Claude Mercier PharmD, PhC, BCPS-AQ ID, FCCP Professor of Pharmacy and Medicine University of New Mexico

PrEP: State of the ART

Recent Breakthroughs in HIV Prevention for Men who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Populations

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against HIV in Primary Care. September 2017 Update. John-Paul Bettencourt, D.O., M.P.H., AAHIVS

Amanda D. Castel, MD, MPH Assistant Professor George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services

HIV PREP THE NEWEST TOOL IN THE BOX

If you are a man that ONLY has sex with women this may not be the brochure for you.

PrEP Implementation in San Francisco. Michael Barajas- Citywide PrEP Navigator San Francisco City Clinic San Francisco Department of Public Health

Lessons from MSM PrEP pilots / demonstration projects. Kevin Rebe

WHO s early release guidelines on PrEP: implications for emtct. Dominika Seidman, MD October 13, 2015

Pre-exposure prophylaxis : Systemic and topical. Linda-Gail Bekker The Desmond Tutu HIV Centre UCT SA HIV ClniciansSociety Conference 2012

Uptake of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men is Associated with Race, Sexual Risk Behavior and Network Size

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and the Governor s Plan to End AIDS: What Every Clinician Needs to Know

Attendees will be able to:

Tuesday, March 1, 2011; 12:15 p.m. EST Pedro Goicochea: (415)

Where are we going after effectiveness studies?

South African Guidelines for the Safe Use of. Dr. Oscar Radebe

Condomless Sex: Was the Swiss statement correct in 2008? Renslow Sherer University of Chicago

HIV Reproductive Health: Conception Options in the Era of PrEP

PEP and PREP. Dr David Hawkins Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

HIV PrEP in Ireland. Information booklet for people who are accessing PrEP themselves or are considering accessing PrEP

Combination HIV Prevention Research Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D.

Fertility Desires/Management of Serodiscordant HIV + Couples

PREP CASE MANAGEMENT: PURPOSE, PROCESS, AND OUTCOMES FOR HIV VULNERABLE PREP INITIATES PRESENTED BY MATT LOWTHER

Supplementary Material Table 5. Ongoing PrEP studies among young key population, young people, and key populations. Age range. Study name and location

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Guidelines for PrEP in PWID

Developing and Implementing a PrEP Demonstration/Implementation Hybrid in a Community-Based Health Center

PrEP Home Checklist v1.0

Clinical Education Initiative PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS. Speaker: Antonia Urbina, MD

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: The New Frontier of Prophylaxis Against HIV Infection

Estimated onset and duration of PrEP activity for daily TDF/FTC using the EC 90 from iprex

Using anti-hiv drugs for prevention

HIV Prevention Pearls

Integrating PrEP with Early Antiretroviral Initiation Kenneth H. Mayer, MD

Antiretroviral Pharmacology for PrEP: Enhancing RCT Understanding with Small Intensive Studies

HIV Prevention: 2010

Transcription:

ATN 110: An HIV PrEP Demonstration Project and Phase II Safety Study for Young Men who Have Sex with Men in the United States Sybil Hosek, Bret Rudy, Raphael Landovitz, Bill Kapogiannis, George Siberry, Brandy Rutledge, Nancy Liu, Jennifer Brothers, Jim Rooney, and Craig M. Wilson on behalf of the ATN 110/113 study team. www.ias2015.org

Background Blinded and open label studies among MSM support the efficacy of TDF/FTC for HIV prevention In the US, gay/bisexual/msm ages 13-24 are hardest hit by HIV epidemic 18-24 year old MSM not well-represented in PrEP safety or efficacy studies in US No PrEP data available on adolescent MSM to date Additional safety and behavioral data, as well as implementation data, in youth are needed to support a PrEP indication Paired PrEP studies: ATN 110 (ages 18-22); data presented here ATN 113 (ages 15-17); data expected 2016 www.ias2015.org

Primary Objectives To provide additional safety data regarding FTC/TDF (Truvada ) use among HIV-uninfected YMSM, ages 18-22. To examine acceptability, patterns of use, rates of adherence and measured levels of drug exposure when YMSM are provided open label FTC/TDF (Truvada ) and information regarding the safety and efficacy of PrEP from prior studies. To examine patterns of sexual behavior when YMSM are provided a behavioral intervention as well as open label FTC/TDF (Truvada ) and information regarding the safety and efficacy of PrEP from prior studies. www.ias2015.org

Age 18-22 Inclusion Criteria Self-reports evidence of high risk for acquiring HIV, including at least one of the following in the last 6 months: Condomless anal intercourse with an HIV-infected male partner or a male partner of unknown HIV status; Anal intercourse with 3 or more male sex partners; Exchange of money, gifts, shelter, or drugs for anal sex with a male partner; Sex with a male partner and has had a STI; Sexual partner of an HIV-infected male with whom condoms were not consistently used; or At least one episode of anal intercourse where the condom broke or slipped off Tests HIV antibody negative at time of screening www.ias2015.org

Study Flow Pre-Screening Survey (venue-based or online) Ineligible or refuse survey In-person screening visit (IC and screening labs) Baseline Visit (review labs & VL) Ineligible based on labs Behavioral Intervention (3MV or PCC) Week 0 Dispense PrEP Follow-up Visits (weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48) Week 48: Evaluate for EPH HIV Seropositive Visits Extension Phase Visits www.ias2015.org

ATN 110 Study Sites www.ias2015.org

Consort Diagram Approached for Pre-screening (N = 2,186) Pre-screened eligible (n=400) Refused pre-screening: 921 Pre-screened ineligible: 865 Refused study participation: 123 In-person Screening Visit (n=277) HIV-positive: 11 (4.4%) No show for visit: 27 Other reasons: 39 99 Assigned to 3MV 33 Pre-DC LTFU (19) W/D consent (7) Moved (3) VL detect (1) 200 Enrolled 101 Assigned to PCC 25 Pre-DC LTFU (16) W/D consent (3) Moved (4) VL detect (1) Other reasons: - Unable to locate (7) - Proteinuria (5) - gr2 hepatobiliary (5) - Other chronic disease (3) - Acute Hep B (1) - Bone fracture (1) www.ias2015.org

Baseline Demographics 21% 17% Black White Asian/PI 7% 2% 53% Hispanic/Latino Other/Mixed Mean age 20.18 Sexual Identity Gay 77.8% Bisexual 13.7% Highest grade completed High School 33.8% Some college 45.5% Not currently working 30.1% Ever kicked out 17.2% Ever paid for sex 28.6% Partners in past mo 5 Condomless sex 81% CRAI w/last partner 58% Any positive STI test 22% www.ias2015.org

Safety 25 discontinued PrEP but stayed on study Primarily personal choice/decision or side effects (predominantly GI symptoms) 3 adverse events were deemed related to study drug Grade 3 nausea Grade 3 weight loss Grade 3 headache DXA data currently being analyzed (collected at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks on all participants) www.ias2015.org

HIV Incidence 4 seroconversions through week 48 HIV incidence = 3.29 per 100 person-years No drug resistance found TFV-DP Level Study Week www.ias2015.org

STI Diagnoses 25 50 45 20 40 35 15 30 25 10 20 15 5 10 5 0 Baseline Week 24 Week 48 Rectal Gonorrhea Rectal Chlamydia Syphilis Any STI 0 www.ias2015.org

Sexual Behavior 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Baseline WK 4 WK 8 WK 12 WK 24 WK 36 WK 48 Male partners CRAI last partner Condom broke RAI Referred for PEP www.ias2015.org

Adherence: TFV-DP (fmol/punch) via DBS and Dosing Estimates 100% 90% >700 (4 or more days) 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 350-699 (2-3 days) <350 (<2 days) BLQ 30% 20% 10% 0% WK 4 WK 8 WK 12 WK 24 WK 36 WK 48 www.ias2015.org

Adherence: Median TFV-DP by Race/Ethnicity 1200 1000 800 600 4+ doses 4+ doses 400 200 0 Week 4 Week 8 Week 12 Week 24 Week 36 Week 48 Overall White Latino Mixed Black/AA www.ias2015.org

Adherence and Sexual Behavior Participants that reported engaging in condomless sex had consistently higher levels of TFV-DP (p=0.005) Remained consistent over course of the study. Similarly, participants who reported CRAI with last partner demonstrated higher TFV- DP levels over course of the study Trend not statistically significant www.ias2015.org

Conclusions ATN 110 successfully identified and engaged YMSM who would be appropriate for PrEP. Previously undiagnosed HIV+ youth were linked to immediate care at youth-focused sites PrEP was well tolerated with minimal adverse events STI diagnoses were high at baseline and remained constant over time HIV incidence rate was high compared to PrEP arms in other open label trials Given high number of incident STIs, would likely be much higher in the absence of PrEP Those that seroconverted had undetectable drug levels www.ias2015.org

Conclusions Participants who reported condomless sex had higher levels of TFV-DP Thus, those that are most susceptible to HIV infection may also be most likely to be adherent Adherence was good overall, but varied by race/ethnicity Consistent with recent research highlighting lack of exposure to HIV prevention interventions by BYMSM CALL TO ACTION for more in-depth understanding of the historical, societal, behavioral and attitudinal barriers to PrEP access and adherence among those most impacted in the US black/african-american young MSM Adherence decreased for all participants as study visits decreased in frequency, regardless of race/ethnicity Youth may need enhanced visit schedules or more frequent interactions (in-person or via mobile technology) www.ias2015.org

Bone Changes in Young Men Ages 18-22 Enrolled in a Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Safety and Demonstration Study Using Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine (Adolescent Trials Network [ATN] Protocol 110) K. Mulligan, B. Rutledge, B.G. Kapogiannis, G.K. Siberry, P.L. Anderson, R.J. Landovitz, B. Rudy, N. Liu, P.L. Havens, C.M. Wilson, S. Hosek for the ATN 110 Protocol Team 17 th International Workshop on Comorbidities and Adverse Drug Reactions; October, 2015

Introduction In the U.S., new HIV infection rates are highest among adolescent young men who have sex with men (YMSM) 1 PrEP with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) taken daily is highly effective in adult MSM 2 Bone loss is a primary toxicity of TDF when used for either HIV treatment 3 or PrEP 4; infants exposed to TDF in utero have lower BMC 5 Peak bone mass is typically achieved in early adulthood and is an important predictor of fracture risk later in life. Thus, there is heightened concern about the use of TDF for HIV prevention in adolescents prior to attainment of peak bone mass. 1) CDC, 2012; 2) Grant NEJM 2012, Lancet 2014; 3) e.g. Gallant JAMA 2004, Stellbrink CID 2010, McComsey JID 2011; 4) Liu PLoSOne 2013, Kosonde PLoSOne 2014, Mulligan CID 2015; 5) Siberry CID 2015

Peak bone mass is achieved during early adulthood Men Women

Adolescent Trials Network (ATN) 110 Open-label PrEP demonstration study to examine patterns of use and adherence and expand safety data among YMSM Enrolled 200 at-risk HIV-negative YMSM, ages 18-22 years, at 12 urban sites in U.S. 48-week study All participants offered PrEP (daily TDF/FTC) plus behavioral risk reduction interventions, sexual health and adherence counseling, STI testing/treatment, condoms Primary results presented at IAS 2015 (Hosek et al.)

ATN 110 Bone Assessment DXA scans of hip, spine, and whole body at baseline, weeks 24 and 48; analyzed centrally Drug levels measured at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 Dosing frequency extrapolated from tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations in red blood cells from dried blood spots; T 1/2 17 days Bone results in seroconverters (N=4) censored beginning with date of seroconversion Hip results in one participant censored due to interference from implants

Baseline Data (N=200) Median age: 20 years (range 18-22) Median BMI: 23.6 kg/m 2 (range 17.3-58.9) Black/African American: 46.5% Latino: 26.5% Decided to take PrEP at outset: 98.3%

Low BMD Z-Scores 1 at Baseline Low BMD Z-Scores at Baseline Region Median (range) % -2.0 2 Spine -0.50 (-3.5 to +2.6) 8.1% Hip -0.34 (-3.0 to +2.9) 6.1% Total body -0.40 (-3.0 to +3.0) 3.7% Low bone mass previously reported in HIV-negative at-risk men in other PrEP and cross-sectional studies 3 1) Z-scores: standard deviations around a mean of zero adjusted for age and race/ethnicity. 2) ISCD criterion for low bone mass for age (Lewiecki Bone 2003) 3) Mulligan CID 2012, 2015; Liu PLoSOne 2013; Grijsen JID 2013

0.4 0.2 0.0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.0-1.2-1.4-1.6 Changes from Baseline in BMD (ITT; medians) % Change in BMD Change in Z-score Whole Body * * Spine Hip Wk 24 Wk 48 N=155 N=134 * 0.00-0.02-0.04-0.06-0.08-0.10-0.12-0.14 Wilcoxon signed rank test: * P 0.001; ** P = 0.02 * ** * * * * Wk 24 Wk 48 * Spine Hip Whole Body

% of participants TFV-DP Concentrations (fmol/punch) Classified as Extrapolated Dosing Frequency 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Wk 4 Wk 8 Wk 12 Wk 24 Wk 36 Wk 48 >1250 (7/wk) 700-1250 (4-6/wk) 350-700 (2-3/wk) LLQ-350 (<2/wk) BLQ Highly protective TFV-DP levels (fmol/punch) in red blood cells from dried blood spots used to classify dosing frequency (tablets/week) using estimates developed for adult MSM in iprex OLE (Grant Lancet 2014)

Percent Change in Spine and Hip BMD from Baseline to Week 48 Correlated with TFV-DP Exposure (%) 15 Spine Spearman correlation: -0.381 P<0.0001 (%) 15 Hip Spearman correlation: -0.376 P<0.0001 10 10 5 5 0 0-5 -5-10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500-10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Wk 48 TFV-DP (fmol/punch) Wk 48 TFV-DP (fmol/punch)

Percent Change from in Spine BMD from Baseline to Week 48 Linked with TFV-DP Exposure 15 10 Highly protective (>700 fmol/punch) % 5 0-5 -10 BLQ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Wk 48 TFV-DP (fmol/punch)

Median % change in BMD by Median Change in BMD by Drug Levels TFV-DP levels Spine Hip % 2.5 2.0 TFV-DP>700 P=0.03 BLQ P<0.001 % 1.0 0.5 TFV-DP>700 P=0.25 BLQ P=0.001 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0 * * * ** 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5 zero ** zero -1.5 Wk 24 Wk 48-3.0 Wk 24 Wk 48 Significance of change vs. baseline: * P 0.05; ** P<0.001 (Wilcoxon signed rank)

Bone Fractures Pre-study: 88 bone fractures in 53/200 (26%) of participants On-study: 8 bone fractures in 5 participants: 2 slamming fingers in a door or knocking against a solid object 1 motor vehicle accident 1 fall 1 fight No participants had Z-scores 2.0

Caveats Open-label study; no pre-defined control group DXA measures areal bone density; considered less accurate during growth, particularly in the hip DXA norms for this age group also subject to criticism

Summary/Conclusions As previously observed in healthy adult and adolescent at-risk men, bone mass is lower than expected in YMSM After 48 weeks, changes in hip and spine BMD were negatively correlated with the magnitude of TFV exposure; bone loss in participants with TFV-DP in the range considered to be highly protective in adults (>700 fmol/punch) was significantly greater than in those with drug levels below the limit of quantitation Although the BMD losses were generally modest, their occurrence before attainment of peak bone mass in young men who already have low bone mass may increase their risk of fragility in adulthood Follow-up will determine whether and to what extent bone losses are reversible following discontinuation of PrEP

Overall Conclusions ATN 110 successfully identified and engaged YMSM who would be appropriate for PrEP. PrEP was well tolerated with minimal adverse events As previously observed, bone mass is lower than expected in YMSM After 48 weeks, changes in hip and spine BMD negatively correlated with TFV exposure; bone loss in participants with TFV-DP >700 fmol/punch was significantly greater than in those with levels BLQ Although modest, BMD loss before attainment of peak bone mass in young men who already have low bone mass may increase their risk of fragility in adulthood Follow-up underway to determine whether and to what extent bone losses are reversible following discontinuation of PrEP

Overall Conclusions STI diagnoses were high at baseline and remained constant over time HIV incidence rate was high compared to PrEP arms in other open label trials Demonstrated ATN s access to key risk population Those most susceptible to HIV infection (e.g. condomless sex) may also be more likely to be adherent

Overall Conclusions Complexities that underpin adherence underscored Variance by R/E consistent with recent research highlighting lack of exposure to HIV prevention interventions by BYMSM NEED more in-depth understanding of the historical, societal, behavioral and attitudinal barriers to PrEP access and adherence among those most impacted in the US black/african-american young MSM Adherence decreased for all participants as study visits decreased in frequency, regardless of R/E Youth may need enhanced visit schedules or more frequent interactions (in-person or via mobile technology)

Acknowledgments Kathleen Mulligan, PhD Sybil Hosek, PhD Craig Wilson, MD Brandy Rutledge, PhD James Bethel, PhD Peter Havens, MD George Siberry, MD, MPH Peter Anderson, PhD Raphael Landovitz, MD, MS Bret Rudy, MD Nancy Liu, MPH Jaime Martinez, MD Kelly Bojan, RN Tufts Body Composition Analysis Center Kenneth Mayer, MD Michelle Lally, MD, MSc Sonia Lee, PhD Liz Salomon, MEd Jennifer Brothers, MPH Keith R. Green, MSW James Rooney, MD, PhD Keith Rawlings, MD Jessica Quan, BS Support: NICHD, NIDA, NIMH Study medication provided by Gilead ATN 110 Study Volunteers