UW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications. BI-RADS 5 th Edition

Similar documents
Leonard M. Glassman MD Analysis of Breast Calcifications

BI-RADS Update. Martha B. Mainiero, MD, FACR, FSBI Brown University Rhode Island Hospital

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

Leonard M. Glassman MD

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Ana Sofia Preto 19/06/2013

Pictorial Essay Singapore Med J 2009; 50(9) :

S. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels

Benign, Reactive and Inflammatory Lesions of the Breast

ORIGINAL ARTICLE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAM WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION

Breast Imaging Lexicon

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

Segmental Breast Calcifications

Lesion Imaging Characteristics Mass, Favoring Benign Circumscribed Margins Intramammary Lymph Node

Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand

Breast calcification: Management and Pictorial Review

ACRIN 6666 IM Additional Evaluation: Additional Views/Targeted US

BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1

Non-mass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Aditi A. Desai, MD Margaret Ann Mays, MD

Microcalcifications detected on mammography classified as BIRADS 4 and 5 and their correlations with histopatologic findigns

Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant

Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant

CURRENTLY IN THE United States, 431,284

Case study 1. Rie Horii, M.D., Ph.D. Division of Pathology Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

Imaging the Symptomatic Patient. Avice M.O Connell MD,FACR,FSBI Professor of Imaging Sciences Director, Women s Imaging University of Rochester

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Pitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI. Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania

Linear Breast Calcifications

AB MR Interpretation Overview

Radiology Review Course Hotel del Coronado Coronado, California

Is Probably Benign Really Just Benign? Peter R Eby, MD, FSBI Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, WA

OF HEMATOMA INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE

Evaluation of Breast Specimens Removed by Needle Localization Technique

CDIS: what's beyond microcalcifications? - Pictorial essay

The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) has standardized the description and management of findings identified on mammograms, thereby f

Hiding in Plain Sight / Site: Archictectural Distortions and Breast Asymmetries

Screen Detected Breast Carcinoma, with Coarse Calcification

Retrospective Analysis on Malignant Calcification Previously Misdiagnosed as Benign on Screening Mammography 스크리닝유방촬영술에서양성으로진단되었던악성석회화에대한후향적분석

AMSER Case of the Month: September 2018

Pathologic outcomes of coarse heterogeneous calcifications detected on mammography

BI-RADS and Breast MRI. Kathy Borovicka, M.D. Thursday February 15, 2018

PLACE LABEL HERE. ACRIN 6657 MRI Form: Pre-Treatment (MRI-1)

MEDICAL IMAGING AND BREAST DISEASE HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

Diagnostic benefits of ultrasound-guided. CNB) versus mammograph-guided biopsy for suspicious microcalcifications. without definite breast mass

Breast Imaging Essentials

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BENIGN EPITHELIAL CHANGES

Index. C Calcifications fat necrosis 1, 61 fat necrosis 4, 69 nipple/peri-areolar involvement 1, 165

National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1

Ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound, mammography and MRI features with pathologic correlation

Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography

Ultrasonography. Methods. Brief Description. Indications. Device-related Prerequisites. Technical Requirements. Evaluation Criteria

Breast MRI Update. Jeffrey C. Weinreb, MD, FACR Yale University School of Medicine

Diagnostic Dilemmas of Breast Imaging

Cytyc Corporation - Case Presentation Archive - March 2002

Malignant transformation of fibroadenomas

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast:

8/31/2016 HIDING IN PLAIN SITE, ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS AND BREAST ASYMMETRIES ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS

COPE Library Sample

Breast pathology. 2nd Department of Pathology Semmelweis University

of Thyroid Lesions Comet Tail Crystals

Breast Calcifications: The Focal Group

Accreditation Case Review: Mammography and Stereotactic Biopsy

Breast Health and Imaging Glossary

PLACE LABEL HERE BASELINE / PRE-TREATMENT. ACRIN 6657 Extension MRI Form: Baseline / Pre-Treatment MRI 1. o Unknown

Learning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening

DCIS of the Breast--MRI findings with mammographic correlation.

Criteria of Malignancy. Evaluation Score

Radiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions?

MRI in breast cancer: diagnosis and intervention. Dr Sue Barter Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge UK

Image guided core biopsies:

Alena Levit MD Avice O Connell MD University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

Medical Education. CME Article Clinics in diagnostic imaging (125) Padungchaichote W, Kongmebhol P, Muttarak M

OPTO-ACOUSTIC BREAST IMAGING

Diseases of the breast (1 of 2)

BREAST MRI. VASILIKI FILIPPI RADIOLOGIST CT MRI & PET/CT Departments Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece

RSNA, /radiol Appendix E1. Methods

Case Scenario 1 History and Physical 3/15/13 Imaging Pathology

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

CHAPTER 2 MAMMOGRAMS AND COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION

GTC 2018, San Jose, USA

Development of a Bayesian Network for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Can magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications?

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

Tips and Tricks to performing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Breast Interventional Procedures Habib Rahbar, MD, FSBI October 23, 2018, 7:00pm ET

IBCM 2, April 2009, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

High Detection Rate of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Mammographically Directed High-Resolution Sonography

Usefulness of MRI of Microcalcification Lesions to Determine the Indication for Stereotactic Mammotome Biopsy

PAAF vs Core Biopsy en Lesiones Mamarias Case #1

MRI BI-RADS: How to make it out?

Min Jung Kim Department of Medicine The Graduate School, Yonsei University

Breast Density. Update 2018: Implications for Clinical Practice

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at ultrasound guided biopsy of breast mass

RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CANCER

Breast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD!

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Papillomas: A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Breast Biopsy and Stereotactic Guided Breast Biopsy

SCBT-MR 2015 LungRADS : Basics

CPC 4 Breast Cancer. Rochelle Harwood, a 35 year old sales assistant, presents to her GP because she has noticed a painless lump in her left breast.

Transcription:

UW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications Grace Kalish, MD Vantage Radiology BI-RADS 5 th Edition Benign Skin Vascular Large rod like Coarse popcorn Suspicious Amorphous Coarse heterogenous Fine pleomorphic Fine linear or fine linear branching Round and punctate Rim Milk of calcium Dystrophic 1

Changes Rim (previously rim, eggshell and lucent centered ) Round and punctate clarified: Round >0.5mm but <1mm Punctate <0.5mm Amorphous (no indistinct) Elimination of the Indeterminate category Distribution Diffuse Regional Clustered (formerly Grouped ) Linear Segmental 2

Case 1 Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Coarse, diffuse 2. Round, diffuse 3. Dystrophic, diffuse 4. Coarse heterogenous, diffuse 3

Discussion: Coarse Coarse-- classically large (>2-3mm) Round usually between 0.5-1mm Dystrophic irregular in shape Coarse heterogenous between 0.5-1mm Case 2. Diagnostic Mag CC Mag ML 4

Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Fine linear, clustered 2. Milk of Calcium, clustered 3. Coarse heterogenous, clustered 4. Amorphous, clustered Discussion: Milk of Calcium Milk of Calcium, clustered Apparent change is the most important feature CC CC ML ML 5

Case 3. Baseline Screen Question: What is the best BI-RADS assessment category? 1. BI-RADS 2 2. BI-RADS 3 3. BI-RADS 0 4. BI-RADS 1 6

Question: What is the best BI-RADS assessment category? 1. BI-RADS 2 2. BI-RADS 3 3. BI-RADS 0 4. BI-RADS 1 Discussion: Screening Mammogram Recommendations Options are BI-RADS 0, BI-RADS 2, or BI-RADS 1 These calcifications are indeterminate without diagnostic evaluation No need to describe morphology on screen Sufficient to state that there are calcifications in the right breast at 2 to 3 o clock 7

Case 3. Diagnostic Question: What is the best BI-RADS assessment category? 1. Benign BI-RADS 2 2. Short term follow up BI-RADS 3 3. Biopsy BI-RADS 4 4. Biopsy BI-RADS 5 8

Question: What is the best BI-RADS assessment category? 1. Benign BI-RADS 2 2. Short term follow up BI-RADS 3 3. Biopsy BI-RADS 4 4. Biopsy BI-RADS 5 Discussion: Coarse Heterogenous Biopsy. BI-RADS 4 Coarse heterogenous, clustered. 13% likelihood of malignancy upon biopsy BI-RADS 5 reserved for fine pleomorphic/linear 70% likelihood of malignancy upon biopsy Source: D Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. ACR BI-RADS Atlas. Breast Imaging Reporting System. 5 th Edition. 2013. pg.61 9

Case 4. Screening. Question: What is the best BI-RADS assessment category? 1. BI-RADS 2 2. BI-RADS 1 3. BI-RADS 0 4. BI-RADS 3 10

Discussion BI-RADS 2 or B-RADS 1 Skin, diffuse Inframammary fold (IMF), parasternal, axilla, and around the areola Individual groups <5mm If you mention them, BI-RADS 2 Skin Calcs - Atypical CC ML 11

Tangential view shows the calcifications to be in the skin Case 5. Diagnostic. 55 year old with new calcifications CC Mag ML Mag Each calcification is <0.5mm 12

Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Round, clustered 2. Punctate, clustered 3. Amorphous, clustered 4. Milk of calcium, clustered Discussion: Punctate Round are >0.5mm but <1mm Margins are visible Do not layer 13

Question: What is the best BI-RADS assessment category? 1. BI-RADS 0 2. BI-RADS 2 3. BI-RADS 3 4. BI-RADS 4 Discussion If new clustered, linear, segmental, or adjacent to known cancer = must biopsy These were DCIS upon biopsy 14

Case 6. Diagnostic ML Mag Each calcification is <0.5mm Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Coarse heterogenous, clustered 2. Fine pleomorphic, clustered 3. Round, clustered 4. Fine linear/branching, clustered 15

Discussion: Fine pleomorphic Fine pleomorphic, clustered Each calcification usually less than 0.5mm 29% of all biopsied positive Coarse heterogenous Usually >0.5mm but <1mm Fine linear/branching Contains a branch point Source: D Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. ACR BI-RADS Atlas. Breast Imaging Reporting System. 5 th Edition. 2013. pg.61 Case 7. Screening. 16

Case 7. Screening. Case 7 17

Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Fine linear/branching, segmental 2. Vascular, segmental 3. Large, rod-like, segmental 4. Coarse heterogenous, segmental Discussion: Large rod-like Large, rod-like calcifications Associated with duct ectasia Most are >0.5mm Ductal distribution, radiating Occasionally branching Usually seen in women who are >60 BI-RADS 2 or BI-RADS 1 18

Case 8. Diagnostic. New Calcifications. Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Fine pleomorphic, regional 2. Fine linear/branching, regional 3. Milk of calcium, regional 4. Large, rod-like, regional 19

Discussion: Fine linear/branching <0.5mm versus large/rod-like >0.5mm Branching PPV of 70% Invasive carcinoma upon biopsy Source: D Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. ACR BI-RADS Atlas. Breast Imaging Reporting System. 5 th Edition. 2013. pg.61 Case 9. Screening. 2000 2009 2013 20

Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Coarse heterogenous 2. Dystrophic 3. Coarse, popcorn 4. Rim Discussion: Coarse popcorn Increasing but conforming to expected pattern Large >2-3 mm Associated with benign-appearing stable mass BI-RADS 2 21

Case 10. Screening. 73 year old with history of prior breast cancer, status post lumpectomy 10 years ago MLO CC Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Rim 2. Fine pleomorphic 3. Amorphous 4. Coarse heterogenous 22

Discussion: Rim Formerly eggshell, and lucent centered Calcium <1mm when viewed on edge Fat necrosis Calcifications in walls of cysts Case 12. Diagnostic. New Calcifications. ML Mag CC Mag 23

Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Fine pleomorphic, clustered 2. Round, clustered 3. Milk of calcium, clustered 4. Amorphous, clustered Discussion: Amorphous Formerly indistinct Hazy Bilateral diffuse can be benign otherwise biopsy PPV is 20% These were benign 24

Case 12. Diagnostic after Baseline Mag ML Mag CC Question: What is the best BI-RADS description of these calcifications? 1. Punctate, diffuse 2. Punctate, regional 3. Amorphous, diffuse 4. Round, regional 25

Discussion: Punctate, Regional Regional usually >2cm Punctate <0.5mm Regional PPV 26% OK to BI-RADS 3 since baseline. If not, biopsy. These were biopsied and were benign. 26