Mid-term results of 300+ patients treated by endovascular aortic sealing (EVAS)

Similar documents
Is EVAS a proper choice in women?

Treatment options of late failures of EVAS. Michel Reijnen Rijnstate Arnhem The Netherlands

Nellix Endovascular System: Clinical Outcomes and Device Overview

Why Nellix? Treating Concomitant Common Iliac Aneurysms

EVAS using Nellix in my practice Where are we today?

The Auckland Experience with the Nellix EVAS System. Andrew Holden, MBChB, FRANZCR

How to select FEVAR versus EVAR + endoanchors in short-necked AAAs

Influence of patient selection and IFU compliance on outcomes following EVAS

Bilateral use of the Gore IBE device for bilateral CIA aneurysms and a first interim analysis of the prospective Iceberg registry

Important Update to Field Safety Notice Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing System Updated Instructions for Use (IFU)

No Neck Is Needed! Treat the Aneurysm Instead! Andrew Holden, MD Associate Professor of Radiology Auckland City Hospital

Chimney endovascular aneurysm sealing (ch-evas) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) due to type Ia endoleak following failed EVAS

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)

EVAS How does this Impact EVAR Therapy

EVAS is Associated with Lower All-Cause Mortality

EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) with Nellix

When to use standard EVAR with EndoAnchors or CHEVAR in short-neck AAAs LINC ASIA 18

Optimizing Accuracy of Aortic Stent Grafts in Short Necks

Mid-term results from ANCHOR: How does this data influence the treatment algorithm for hostile EVAR anatomies

ENCORE, a Study to Investigate the Durability of Polymer EVAR with Ovation A Contemporary Review of 1296 Patients

Current Status of EVAR for Infrarenal AAA. 31 st Annual Florida Vascular Society. PENN Surgery

SANWICH TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE COMPLICATIONS WHEN TREATING BILATERAL INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY

Lessons learned from Ch-EVAR for the treatment of. Miltos Matsagkas MD, PhD, FEBVS Professor of Vascular Surgery University of Thessaly

Improving Endograft Durability with EndoAnchors

EVAS Sealing Technology: The new paradigm in AAA therapy

CAUTION: The Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing System is an investigational device. Limited by federal (or United States) law to investigational

GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis demonstrates long-term durability. Michel Reijnen Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, The Netherlands

The Ventana Off-the-Shelf Graft for Pararenal AAA. Andrew Holden Associate Professor of Radiology Auckland Hospital

History of the Powerlink System Design and Clinical Results. Edward B. Diethrich Arizona Heart Hospital Phoenix, AZ

Endovascular options of treating iliac aneurysms

My personal experience with INCRAFT in standard and challenging cases

Hypogastric Preservation Using Retrograde Endovascular Bypass

Prospective Study of the E-liac Stent Graft System in Patients with Common Iliac Artery Aneurysm: 30-Day Results

Anatomy-Driven Endograft Selection for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair S. Jay Mathews, MD, MS, FACC

Endovascular Repair o Abdominal. Aortic Aneurysms. Cesar E. Mendoza, M.D. Jackson Memorial Hospital Miami, Florida

Ovation. Sean Lyden, MD Department Chair, Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic

EVAR replaced standard repair in most cases. Why?

Feasibility of aortic neck anatomy for endovascular aneurysm repair in Korean patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

Anatomical challenges in EVAR

Analysis of Type IIIb Endoleaks Encountered with Endologix Endografts

Robert F. Cuff, MD FACS SHMG Vascular Surgery

symptomatic aneurysms or aneurysms that grow >1cm/yr

Standardization of the CHEVAR procedure: How a standard approach has improved outcomes. Prof Peter Holt St George s, London

EVAR Revision Setting - How can Heli-FX EndoAnchors improve the outcomes?

Clinical trial and real-world outcomes of an endovascular iliac aneurysm repair with the GORE Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE)

Use of Aptus Heli-FX EndoAnchor implants with standard endografts to strengthen seal in hostile anatomies:

Chungbuk Regional Cardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital Sangmin Kim

Young-Guk Ko, M.D. Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System,

MODERN METHODS FOR TREATING ABDOMINAL ANEURYSMS AND THORACIC AORTIC DISEASE

Durability of The Endurant Stent-Graft through 5 Years

Access More Patients. Customize Each Seal.

BC Vascular Day. Contents. November 3, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 2 3. Peripheral Arterial Disease 4 6. Deep Venous Thrombosis 7 8

Reinterventions After Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. A Surgeons Perspective Dr. Derek D. Muehrcke

14F OD Ovation Abdominal Stent Graft System

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing: Early and Midterm Results From the EVAS FORWARD Global Registry

Hostile Proximal Neck: A New Conformable EVAR Device

Conflicts of Interest. When and Why Complex EVAR in Tx of juxta/suprarenal AAA? Summary. Infrarenal EVAR for short necks 2y postop

Trattamento Endovascolare degli Aneurismi dell Aorta Addominale con Colletto Prossimale Ostile:

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE)

Talent Abdominal Stent Graft

Disclosures. EVAR follow-up: actual recommendation. EVAR follow-up: critical issues

The Fate of Unexpected Events Occurring in Standard EVAR

How to Categorize the Infrarenal Neck Properly? I Van Herzeele Dept. Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium

US clinical trial update on the Gore Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE)

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing System for Treating Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Early Outcomes from a Single Center

Obesity, Scaring, Access in EVAR. Kiskinis D, Melas N, Ktenidis K. 1 st Department of Surgery Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

A New EVAR Device for Infrarenal AAAs

Endovascular therapy for Ischemic versus Nonischemic complicated acute type B aortic dissection (catbad).

Abdominal and thoracic aneurysm repair

Insights from the PROTAGORAS/PERICLES Registries: impact on ChEVAR results

Retrograde Embolization of a Symptomatic Hypogastric Artery Aneurysm

TriVascular Ovation Prime Abdominal Stent Graft System

for Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms

Outcomes of endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. A. Stella

Challenging anatomies demand versatility.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 가천대길병원 이상준

11/20/2014. Disclosures. Kissing Balloons and Stents. Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease. Data on Patency of Kissing Stents.

Degeneration of the Neck Post Implementation - a New Era of AAA Stent

Treating very short necks ( 4mm <10mm) using the Endurant stent graft + EndoAnchors: 1-year results and current insights

ChEVAR Vs. fevar for juxtarenal Aneurysm. E.Ducasse MD PhD FEVBS Unit of vascular surgery CHU bordeaux

Type 1a Endoleak in hostile neck anatomies: Endoanchor can fix it! D. Böckler University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Taming The Aorta. David Minion, MD Program Director, Vascular Surgery University of Kentucky Medical Center Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after EVAR Longterm results from the ENGAGE Registry

Feasibility and Technical Aspects of Proximal Nellix-in-Nellix Extension for Late Caudal Endograft Migration

Durable outcomes. Proven performance.

Faculty Disclosure. Glue, Particulates, Thrombin, Coils and the Kitchen Sink for Type II Endoleak Management. Background.

Prof. Franco Grego. Predictors of endoleak type II risk, in the era of prevention with aneurysm sac filling

THE ENDURANT STENT GRAFT IN HOSTILE ANEURYSM NECK ANATOMY

Management of the hypogastric artery during EVAR. Francesco Torella Liverpool Vascular & Endovascular Service

Off-the-Shelf Devices. Mark A Farber, MD FACS Director, Aortic Center Professor of Radiology and Surgery University of North Carolina

The clinical update for the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft has included results from the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft multi-center clinical study,

From 1996 to 1999, a total of 1,193 patients with

Hostile Neck During EVAR, The Role Of Endoanchores

Aortic Neck Issues Associated Clinical Sequelae/Implications for Graft Choice

Three year experience with multilayer stent in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms no evidence for aneurysm stabilization

NASDAQ: ELGX December Innovation that Empowers

Reduction in cardiovascular related adverse events following active sac management with Nellix vs. EVAR: Are there biological advantages?

Now that Endoanchors are Approved (and paid for) We have a Durable Solution to Short Necks That s so Easy!

Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Transcription:

Mid-term results of 300+ patients treated by endovascular aortic sealing (EVAS) Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries Dept Vascular Surgery St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein,The Netherlands On behalf of the DEVASS study group 7th MAC Conference München, Dec 7th-9th 2017

Disclosures: Co-founder of Endovascular Diagnostics Consultant for Medtronic, Endologix Advisory board member for Medtronic, Arsenal Research grants: Cardionovum, BARD, Endologix, BTG

Case Control Studies RCTs Why searching for an alternative? Trial/Author Year N Follow-up Years (Mean or Median) Secondary Procedures (% of Patients) EVAR-1 2010 626 6 23 EVAR-2 2010 197 3.1 28 DREAM 2010 173 6.4 28 OVER 2009 444 1.8 10 Carpenter 2010 157 1.8 8.9 Conrad 2010 832 2.9 11 Mehta 2010 1,768 2.8 18 AbuRahma 2009 238 2 26 Dias 2009 279 4.5 20 Abbruzzese 2009 565 2.5 11 Pitoulias 2009 617 3.8 23 Kim 2008 310 3.3 19 Schermerhorn 2008 22,830 4 9.0 Aneurysm related readmissions: Average 3.5 Years 18% 61% cost-differential vs open surgery

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing System (Nellix) Introduce both catheters over.035 wires Balloon expand both stents (CoCr Alloy) Fill with Polymer using pressure monitoring Designed to fill and seal the entire aneurysm sac and target the direct causes of secondary interventions Endobags filled with biostable polymer seal anatomy from renals to hypogastrics

Freedom from type IA endoleaks (IFU 2013) 96.9% 85.6% On-IFU Off-IFU Complex Proximal Neck Anatomy p-value = 0.0008 Large proximal necks >28mm Thrombus-laden necks

Freedom from secondary interventions (IFU 2013) 92.2% 80.7% p-value = 0.0066 On-IFU Off-IFU Reason (N = 277) Endoleak 20 (7.2%) Occlusion 8 (2.9%) Migration 3 (1.1%) Other 13 (4.7%) Mean follow-up 25 months (0-35 )

Refined Nellix IFU (2016)

Refined Nellix IFU (2016)

Start N = 355 16 Symptomatic 11 Ruptured 3 Missing CT 17 Nellix as relining 12 Unilateral Nellix 19 Ch-EVAS 3 Nellix in Nellix 10 CIAA Asymptomatic N = 325 Elective EVAS procedure N = 264 DEVASS Tilburg, Arnhem, Nieuwegein Anatomy outside IFU 2013 N = 96 Anatomy within IFU 2013 N = 168 Anatomy within IFU 2016 N = 48 Anatomy outside IFU 2016 N = 216 168 within IFU 2013 = 64% 48 within IFU 2016 = 18%

Baseline characteristics Baseline characteristics Total cohort IFU 2013 IFU 2016 P value** Sex Male Female 310 (87.3) 45 (12.7) 155 (92.3) 13 (7.7) 40 (83.3) 8 (16.7) 0.064 Age at procedure* 75 (68-79) 74 (68-79) 75 (68.25-79) 0.702 ASA class 2 >2 missing 199 (56.1) 146 (41.1) 10 (2.8) 107 (63.7) 60 (35.7) 1 (0.6) 29 (60.4) 18 (37.5) 1 (2.1) 0.766 Hypertension 242 (68.2) 112 (66.7) 33 (68.8) 0.786 Hyperlipidemia 267 (75.2) 126 (75.0) 38 (79.2) 0.552 Smoking, or history of smoking in last 10 years 159 (44.8) 78 (46.4) 20 (41.7) 0.559 Cardiac disease 151 (42.5) 72 (42.9) 27 (56.3) 0.117 Pulmonary disease 96 (27.0) 47 (28.0) 13 (27.1) 0.903 Renal disease 91 (25.6) 34 (20.2) 8 (16.7) 0.581 Diabetes mellitus 51 (14.4) 27 (16.1) 11 (22.9) 0.272

Anatomical characteristics Anatomical characteristics IFU 2013 IFU 2016 P-value** Infrarenal neck diameter 23.3 (21.8 25.5) 22.3 (20.9 24.3) *0.031 Infrarenal neck angle 21.9 (13.1 35.0) 25.2 (15.2 38.2) 0.234 Infrarenal neck length at 10% diameter increase 18.0 (12.0 31.0) 20.0 (15.0 30.8) 0.548 AAA lumen diameter 42.3 (37.9 48.1) 46.6 (41.3 50.8) *0.003 AAA outer diameter 57.9 (54.3 61.7) 56.4 (53.0 61.2) 0.141 Ratio AAA outer diameter to AAA lumen diameter 1.35 (1.19 1.57) 1.27 (1.15 1.32) *0.000 Infrarenal lumen volume 80.3 (64.1 107.3) 93.6 (73.7 110.8) 0.128 Right CIA lumen diameter 10.5 (9.3 12.0) 10.0 (9.2 11.0) 0.054 Right CIA outer diameter 18.0 (15.0 21.4) 16.5 (14.1 18.2) *0.002 Left CIA lumen diameter 10.5 (9.3 12.0) 10.2 (9.1 11.0) 0.133 Left CIA outer diameter 17.2 (14.8 20.4) 16.0 (14.1 18.1) *0.019

Exclusion from IFU 2016 Instructions for use 2016 Infrarenal neck IFU 2016 Length > 10mm and < 10% diameter change Diameter > 18 mm Diameter < 28 mm Missing data Patients compliant with criteria. N(%) 183 (69.3) 204 (77.3) 254 (96.2) 207 (78.4) 3 (1.1) Infrarenal neck angle < 60 258 (97.7) Aneurysm blood lumen diameter < 60mm 254 (96.2) Ratio of max aortic aneurysm diameter to max aortic blood lumen diameter <1.4 149 (56.4) CIA luminal diameter 9 to 35mm CIA diameter > 9 mm CIA diameter < 35 mm Missing data Distal iliac artery seal (length >10mm and outer diameter 9 to 20mm) 207 (78.4) 206 (78.0) 264 (100.0) 5 (1.9) 167 (63.3) Access diameter >7mm 236 (89.4)

Follow up Total cohort: 18 months (IQR 11-24) IFU 2013: 23 months (IQR 12-26) IFU 2016: 23 months (IQR 12-29)

Initial outcome IFU 2013 IFU 2016 Initial technical success 165 (98.2) 47 (97.9) Technical failure 3 (1.8) 1 (2.1) Unplanned distal extension 8 (4.8) 1 (2.1) Duration of hospital stay 3 (3-4) 3 (3-4) Procedure time 90 (70-108) 90 (74-106) Blood loss 130 (100-300) 150 (63-300)

Reinterventions IFU 2013 IFU 2016 p Reintervention 19 (11.3) 4 (8.3).555 Conversions to open repair o IFU 2013: 6 (3.6%) o IFU 2016: 1 (2.1%)

Reinterventions 30 days o 1 femoral-femoral bypass (also IFU 2016) o 1 thrombectomy with relining o 1 thrombectomy with endarterectomy of CFA 30 days - 1 year o 1 thrombectomy with relining (also IFU 2016) o o o o 2 thrombectomy with iliac extension/stenting 1 thrombolysis with iliac stenting 1 relining of both EVAS stents for iliac stenosis 1 conversion to open repair for an aorto-enteral fistual (3 months after EVAS procedure

Reinterventions 1 year - 2 years o o 1 relining for stenosis 1 femoral-femoral bypass for occlusion o 1 Embolization for type IA endoleak (IFU 2016) o 2 Nellix-in-Nellix proximal extensions (one for secondary rupture and one for migration) o 5 conversions to open repair (IFU 2016) 1 Endoleak type Ia with migration (24 months) 1 AAA sac expansion (15 months) 1 Para-aortitis (22 months) 2 Endoleak type IA (13 and 24 months, last within IFU 2016)

Reinterventions

Novel classification proximal endoleaks 1S1 1S2 1S3 1S4 MMPJ Reijnen et al. Submitted for publication

Endoleaks IFU 2013 IFU 2016 p Endoleak 9 (5.4) 3 (2.1).583 1 year: o 2 type 1S2 (1 within IFU 2016) o 1 type 1S3 o 1 type 1b 1 year 2 years o 3 type 1S2 o 3 type 1S3 (2 within IFU 2016)

Endoleaks

Migration

Comparison IFU 2013 vs 2016 Freedom from: IFU 2013 IFU 2016 P-value Reintervention 89.7% 95.7%.342 Primary patency 94.0% 95.8%.846 Secondary patency 97.6% 100%.432 All endoleak 92.7% 90.1%.708 Type IA endoleak 93.3% 90.1%.577 Migration 89.9% 100%.150 Aneurysm growth 91.8% 89.3%.843 Mortality 90.9% 95.5%.472

Conclusions EVAS when used within the IFU has acceptable 2-year results (certainly not better compared to EVAR), but longer follow-up and a bigger sample size is clearly indicated, as the Kaplan-Meier curves are not flattening out. The refined IFU significantly reduced the applicability of the technique, but didn t improve results significantly. Proposed advantages of EVAS didn t come out with the current generation device.