Catheter direct thrombolysis: Role of actilyse in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis

Similar documents
Interventional Treatment VTE: Radiologic Approach

Venous interventions in DVT

Aggressive endovascular management of ilio-femoral DVT. thrombotic syndrome. is the key in preventing post

Surgical approach for DVT. Division of Vascular Surgery Department of Surgery Seoul National University College of Medicine

Iliofemoral DVT: Miminizing Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

Pharmaco-mechanical techniques stand alone procedures? Peter Neglén, MD, PhD SP Vascular Center Limassol Cyprus

The Evidence Base for Treating Acute DVT

Not all Leg DVT s are the Same: Which Patients Benefit from Interventional Therapy? Case 1:

Intervention for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolus

Use of EKOS Catheter in the management of Venous Mr. Manoj Niverthi, Mr. Sarang Pujari, and Ms. Nupur Dandavate, The GTF Group

4/30/2018 CLOT+ In patients with an acute proximal deep vein thrombosis, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis does not reduce t

Management of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

Innovative Endovascular Approach to Pulmonary Embolism by Ultrasound Enhanced Thrombolysis. Prof. Ralf R.Kolvenbach MD,PhD,FEBVS

DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS (DVT): TREATMENT

Percutaneously Inserted AngioVac Suction Thrombectomy for the Treatment of Filter-Related. Iliocaval Thrombosis

Ultrasound-enhanced, catheter-directed thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism

DOPPLER ULTRASOUND OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS

Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:

J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2009, 49:

Venous Thrombosis. Magnitude of the Problem. DVT 2 Million PE 600,000. Death 60,000. Estimated Cost of VTE Care $1.5 Billion/year.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

Ileo Femoral DVT Review and Update

THERE IS NO ROLE FOR SURGICAL THERAPY FOR DVT

Optimal Utilization of Thrombolytics

Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Treatment

Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Iliofemoral DVT with the Aspirex Catheter: The Dijon Experience

Should We Be More Aggressive in the Treatment of Acute DVT?

BC Vascular Day. Contents. November 3, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 2 3. Peripheral Arterial Disease 4 6. Deep Venous Thrombosis 7 8

Disclosures. DVT: Diagnosis and Treatment. Questions To Ask. Dr. Susanna Shin - DVT: Diagnosis and Treatment. Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) None

Challenging Case of Pulse Infusion Thrombolysis Using a Unique Pump System for a Patient With Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report

Innovative Endovascular Approach to Pulmonary Embolism by Ultrasound Enhanced Thrombolysis. Prof. Ralf R.Kolvenbach MD,PhD,FEBVS

Technique de recanalisation: mon expérience avec Aspirex

How long to continue anticoagulation after DVT?

RadRx Your Prescription for Accurate Coding & Reimbursement Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Emerging Tools for Lytic-Free, Single-Session Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Disease

With All the New Drugs, This is How I Treat Acute DVT and Superficial Phlebitis

A A U

Diagnosis and Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

IVC FILTERS: A CASE REPORT REVIEWING THE INDICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT, RETRIEVAL AND ANTICOAGULATION

How to best approach chronic venous occlusions?

Straub Endovascular System &

Treatment of Chronic DVT with EKOS: Reproducing ACCESS PTS Data in Every Day Clinical Practice

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE

4/23/2009. September 15, 2008

PEARL Registry Update Overview Venous Arterial AV Access

Supplementary Online Content

Copy Here. The Easy One.. What is the Role of Thrombus Removal in Acute Proximal DVT after ATTRACT? Deep Venous Thrombosis Spectrum

Intended Learning Outcomes

NOTE: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Risk Factors

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), often the

CURRENT & FUTURE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM. Gordon Lowe Professor of Vascular Medicine University of Glasgow

Risk factors for DVT. Venous thrombosis & pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation (cont d) Diagnosis 1/5/2018. Ahmed Mahmoud, MD

Venous thrombosis & pulmonary embolism. Ahmed Mahmoud, MD

Techniques for thrombus removal in acute DVT Benefits of an Endovascular Approach for Rapid Flow Restoration in DVT

Mabel Labrada, MD Miami VA Medical Center

EKOS. Interventional Vascular 3 February, Imagine where we can go.

Venous thrombosis is common and often occurs spontaneously, but it also frequently accompanies medical and surgical conditions, both in the community

DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO IMPROVING CLINICAL OUTCOMES

Treatment of Axillosubclavian Vein Thrombosis: A Novel Technique for Rapid Removal of Clot Using Low-Dose Thrombolysis

VIRTUS: Trial Design and Primary Endpoint Results

What is New in Acute Pulmonary Embolism? Interventional Treatment. Prof. Nils Kucher University Hospital Bern Switzerland

Improved clinical outcomes Evidence on venous thrombectomy followed by stenting

The evidence for venous interventions is evolving- many patients do actually benefit. Nils Kucher University Hospital Bern Switzerland

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM

Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Clinical Guide - Inferior Vena Cava Filters (Reviewed 2006)

Complex Iliocaval Reconstruction PNEC. Seattle WA. Bill Marston MD Professor, Div of Vascular Surgery University of N.

ENHANCING YOUR OPTIONS

What is the optimal time window for treating deep venous thrombosis? Acute vs subacute vs chronic

Improved clinical outcomes Evidence on venous mechanical thrombectomy followed by stenting

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO-EOLSS MANAGEMENT OF SUBCLAVIAN VEIN THROMBOSIS KNOWN AS PAGET-SCHROETTER SYNDROME

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2017 Toronto, ON

PULMONARY EMBOLISM (PE): DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Limb Ischemia. Hwan Jun Jae MD Seoul National University Hospital Seoul, Korea

Deep Venous Pathology. Eberhard Rabe Department of Dermatology University of Bonn Germany

A volumetric index for the quantification of deep venous thrombosis

Algorithm for Managing Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia. Peter A. Schneider, MD Honolulu, Hawaii

Starting with deep venous treatment

DISORDERS OF VENOUS SYSTEM

ENDOVASCULAR THERAPIES FOR ACUTE STROKE

Interventional treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Venous stent experience in Arnsberg Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

VIVO-EU Results: Prospective European Study of the Zilver Vena TM Venous Stent in the Treatment of Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction

Chronic Iliocaval Venous Occlusive Disease

VTE in Children: Practical Issues

Discussion Leader: Doug Bias, M.D.

Management of Acute DVT Extending From the Tibial Veins to the Common Iliac Vein Using the AngioJet Thrombectomy System

Learning Objectives for Rotations in Vascular Surgery Year 3 Basic Clerkship

Ultrasound-accelerated Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis: Initial Clinical Experience

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurs frequently

DVT - initial management NSCCG

Disclosures. What is a Specialty Vein Clinic? Prevalence of Venous Disease. Management of Venous Disease: an evidence based approach.

Implications from the ACCP 2012 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Thrombosis: a case based approach

Tom Eisele, Benedikt M. Muenz, and Grigorios Korosoglou. Department of Cardiology & Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany

Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Thrombolysis in PE. Outline. Disclosure. Overview on Pulmonary Embolism. Hot Topics in Emergency Medicine 2012 Midyear Clinical Meeting

- Our patients with iliofemoral DVT - Effective thrombus removal with purely mechanical thrombectomy can lead to better outcomes

This chapter will describe the effectiveness of antithrombotic

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Transcription:

The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (2013) 44, 57 62 Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrnm www.sciencedirect.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Catheter direct thrombolysis: Role of actilyse in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis Mohsen Gomaa *, Hossam Fahmy, Ahmed Farouk Radiodiagnosis Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, 2 Elkarim St., Ziton, Cairo, Egypt Received 8 July 2012; accepted 7 October 2012 Available online 8 November 2012 KEYWORDS Thrombolysis; Actilyse; Deep venous thrombosis Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the short and long term efficiency of catheter directed thrombolysis using recombinant tissue type plasminogin activator (r-tpa; Actilyse), in treating acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb. Material and methods: Twenty-eight patients with acute lower limb deep venous thrombosis underwent treatment by direct intra clot injection of thrombolytic therapy; Actilyse. Result: Thrombus lysis was completed in 23 (82.2%) of 28 patients, partial in 4 (14.3%) patients and not achieved in one (3.5%) patient. There was no major complication. There was no rethrombosis or post thrombotic syndrome in any of the treated 23 patients over the follow up period of one year. Conclusion: The treatment of acute lower limb deep venous thrombosis using recombinant tissue type plasminogin activator (r-tpa; Actilyse), is safe, effective and achieves significantly better short and long term clinical outcome for patients. Ó 2012 Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity is recognized as a cause of both pulmonary embolism and the post thrombotic syndrome. The therapeutic goals for treating the patients with acute DVT include, diminishing the severity and duration * Corresponding author. Tel.: +20 1003080608; fax: +20 226359982. E-mail address: sharkawymohsen@yahoo.com (M. Gomaa). Peer review under responsibility of Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier of lower extremity symptoms, preventing pulmonary embolism, minimizing the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis and preventing the post thrombotic syndrome [1,2]. Success in the achievement of these clinical goals will minimize the morbidity and mortality of pulmonary embolism and will diminish the sequelae of post thrombotic syndrome [3]. Early thrombus removal is a logical approach to improve the long term outcome of DVT [4]. Although anticoagulation (heparin followed by oral anticoagulation) is currently considered the standard of care for protecting the patient from the manifestation of post thrombotic syndrome which can appear months to years after the acute episode of DVT [5,6]. However, this regimen does not promote lysis to reduce the thrombus load and does not restore the venous valve function [7]. Thrombolytic therapy is attractive, because it can potentially help achieve 0378-603X Ó 2012 Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2012.10.001

58 M. Gomaa et al. restoration of the lumen and removal of the thrombus lining the venous valves. Two goals may be achieved: relief of venous outflow obstruction and preservation of valve function [8]. The frequently used thrombolytic agents that rapidly clear venous thrombosis include streptokinase, urokinase, and recombinant tissue type plasminogin activator (r,tpa) like alteplase and actilyse. It can be used systemically or loco regional [9]. Transcatheter regional infusion allows higher concentrations of the thrombolytic agent to be introduced directly into the thrombus [10]. However, continuous infusion potentially results in prolonged exposure of the systemic circulation to thrombolytic agents which can increase the risk of bleeding [11]. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of catheter directed thrombolysis for treatment of lower extremity DVT using recombinant human tissue type plasminogin activator; actilyse. 2. Patients and methods Twenty-eight consecutive patients (15 women and 13 men, age range of 17 76 years; mean age of 38 years) with recent lower extremity venous thrombosis of less than 15 days but without clinically relevant signs of pulmonary embolism, were included in this prospective study. The onset of the thrombosis was based upon the date of the initial clinical symptoms. The study was conducted in Doctor Soliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, KSA between April 2008 and August 2011. Patients were selected on the basis of the following criteria: (a) symptomatic lower extremity thrombus confirmed by duplex ultrasound; (b) severe clinical symptoms; pain and swelling, which prohibit standing on the leg; and (c) no contraindication to infusion of the thrombolytic agent. Contraindications to thrombolytic agents included active internal bleeding; cerebrovascular accident within previous 2 months; recent major trauma or surgery; recent gastrointestinal bleeding; severe hypertension; pregnancy, lactation or delivery within the last 20 days; malignant disease; acute pancreatitis; hepatic failure; renal failure and coagulopathy. All patients gave written informed consent to participate after the risks and benefits of treatment were fully explained. The left leg was involved in 18 patients, the right leg in 9 patients and the last patient had bilateral thrombosis. All patients had popliteo-femoral thrombi that were seen extending to the common iliac vein in 22 patients and to the inferior vena cava in the other 6 patients. The patients were initially evaluated with a careful history taking to discover a possible etiology. After a thorough examination, complete blood count and prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and INR were determined. The leg circumferences and D-dimer levels were also measured and recorded before and after thrombolytic therapy. 2.1. Technique for thrombolysis With the patient in prone position, the ipsilateral popliteal vein of the affected limb was visualized by ultrasound. A single wall puncture was made using a small gauge needle, to avoid inadvertent puncture of the adjacent popliteal artery. A hydrophilic guide wire (Guide Wire M, Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was inserted and advanced through the whole length of the thrombus. A 5-F vascular sheath was then inserted through which all subsequent catheter and wire exchanges were performed. In addition, the vascular sheath allowed the intensive care team to obtain blood samples while avoiding the risk of phlebotomy during thrombolysis. We used the hydrophilic guide wire before insertion of the vascular sheath to be sure that we are within the thrombotic vein and to test the accessibility of the thrombus. After that, contrast material was injected through the sideway of the vascular sheath to document the thrombus, to determine its distal extent, and to visualize collaterals. For infusion of thrombolytic agent, an infusion wire with multiple side holes and stiffening core (Katzen, Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick; USA) was used. The wire was advanced and embedded within the proximal part of the thrombus. The stiffening core was retracted and infusion of thrombolytic agent was started as follows: a loading dose of 15 mg Actilyse (rt-pa, Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) was injected manually as three doses each of them 5 mg at 10 min intervals. Actilyse was then infused into the thrombus at a rate of 1 mg/h up to 1.5 mg/h with the aid of an infusion pump over a period of maximum 4 days. Standard unfractionated heparin (Liquemin, Hoffmann-La Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) was injected simultaneously in the side arm of the vascular sheath at a fixed rate of 5000 IU/h and intravenously at a rate of 5000 to 7000 IU/h, with the dosage adjusted according to the PTT value (2.0 to 3.0 times normal value). Progression of lysis was controlled by venography every 24 h. Once partial patency is achieved, the infusion wire was advanced and infusion continued from the proximal part of residual thrombus. The treatment was stopped in any case if no residual thrombotic material was visible or if no further lysis was observed between two consecutive venographies. During thrombolytic therapy, the patient was rested in bed in intensive care unit since a close observation is essential to detect any evidence of hemorrhagic complication. Removal of the vascular sheath was done 12 h after cessation of the thrombolytic infusion; care was taken with final removal for the high risk of local extravasation and hematoma. Therapy was continued with the standard anticoagulant, given in individual doses so that the international normalized ratio (INR) was greater than 2.5 but less than 4.0. The patients were followed every week for the first 3 months and later every three months for 1 year. 3. Results Initial clinical symptoms and the distribution of thrombi are summarized in Table 1. Treatment outcomes are summarized in Table 2. Table 1 Symptoms and location of DVT in 28 patients. Initial symptoms No. of patients Edema 25 Pain 28 Location and extension of the thrombus: Poplitofemoral thrombus extending to the iliac vein 22 Poplitofemoral thrombus extending up to the IVC 6

Catheter direct thrombolysis: Role of actilyse in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis 59 Table 2 Treatment outcomes in 28 patients treated for DVT. Treatment outcome No. of patients Lysis of thrombosis Complete 23 Partial 4 No lysis 1 Successful placement of the thrombolysis catheter across the occluded veins occurred in all 28 treated patients. Complete lysis was achieved in 23 patients (82.2%) (Fig. 1 and 2), partial lysis was achieved in 4 (14.3%) (Fig. 3). The last patient (3.5%) nearly failed after 72 h of thrombolysis mostly due to old thrombosis (misdiagnosed as muscular skeletal disorder for more than 2 weeks) (Fig. 4). In this patient only the femoral vein was recanalized after catheter insertion with no lysis of the thrombus in external iliac, common iliac and inferior vena cava. Minor complication of echomosis at the puncture site was encountered in 10 of 28 (35%). None of these required surgical intervention or blood transfusion, no major complication encountered. Clinical follow-up and Doppler ultrasound evaluation up to one year of the 23 treated patients who showed complete lysis revealed no rethrombosis or post thrombotic sequelae syndrome. 4. Discussion Despite advances in the diagnosis and management of thromboembolic disease, it remains a potentially life threatening disorder affecting hospitalized patients as well as healthy individuals [12]. In addition to early risk of pulmonary embolism, late morbidity may develop from recurrent thrombosis and post thrombotic syndrome [13]. The management of DVT has evolved in recent years to encompass the outpatient use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as well as pharmacological thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy [14]. During the acute phase, proximal DVT is associated with morbidity in the form of leg edema, pain and difficult ambulation [15]. One of the primary goals of therapy is to relieve outflow obstruction; however this could not be accomplished entirely by anticoagulation alone because thrombus regression occurs in only 50% of patients and venous recanalization develops in only a minority of patients [4,16]. For prevention of pulmonary embolism immediate anticoagulation with heparin is the standard of care for all patients with significant DVT in the absence of absolute contraindication. Systemic thrombolysis can be used also to prevent recurrent PE when given with or without concomitant heparin [17]. Figure 1 Complete lysis of popliteo-femoral thrombus in a 51 year old female patient, who presented with acute onset of pain and edema of the left lower limb. (A&B) venogram obtained before thrombolysis, while patient was in a prone position, shows complete thrombosis of the left popliteal (A), and the superficial femoral vein (B), (arrows). (C) venogram obtained 24 h after thrombolysis showing partial lysis of the thrombus with still occluded distal part of SFV (arrow). (D&E) venogram obtained 48 h after thrombolysis that showing complete lysis of the thrombus. Arrow in (E) marks the Katzen infusion guide wire.

60 M. Gomaa et al. Figure 2 Complete lysis of the left popliteo-femoral thrombus that extends up to the IVC in a 48 year old female patient. (A&B) venogram obtained before thrombolysis, while patient was in a prone position, showing complete thrombosis of the left popliteal and superficial femoral vein (A), and common femoral veins (B), (arrows). (C&D) venogram obtained 24 h after thrombolysis showing complete lysis of the thrombus up to the external iliac vein, still with partial occlusion of the common iliac vein (short arrows) and the IVC (long arrow). (E) venogram obtained 48 h after thrombolysis showing complete lysis of the thrombus at the common iliac vein (short arrow) and the IVC (long arrow). Figure 3 Partial lysis of the thrombus in a 36 year old male patient. (A) Venogram obtained before thrombolysis, while patient was in a prone position, shows complete thrombosis of the left popliteal and superficial femoral veins (short arrows). Long arrow demonstrates the Terumo guide wire advanced through the thrombus. (B) Venogram obtained 24 h after thrombolysis showing partial lysis of the thrombus. (C&D) Venogram obtained 48 h after thrombolysis shows complete lysis of the thrombus at the popliteal and SFV, with partial lysis at the common femoral vein (arrows). The occlusion remained after 72 h of thrombolysis with no remarkable change. As regards the late morbidity of post thrombotic syndrome which develops in 20% to 50% of patients with DVT, it occurs more frequently with extensive multi level DVT and when the oral anticoagulant regimens are inadequate [18,19]. Its symptoms include chronic leg heaviness, leg aching and venous claudication, edema, varicosities, hyperpigmentation and non healing ulcers due to the consequences of the venous valvular incompetence, venous hypertension and stasis [13]. The above observations raise the need for treatment therapy that removes the thrombus to preserve the valvular competence, reduces the venous outflow obstruction and reduces the post thrombotic syndrome since the anticoagulant therapy prevents thrombus propagation, PE and recurrent venous thrombosis but it do not dissolve the occluding thrombus or reduce the venous outflow obstruction. These therapies include open surgical thrombectomy and pharmacological thrombolytic therapy. Pharmacological thrombolytic therapy prompts restoration of venous patency and preservation of venous valve function.

Catheter direct thrombolysis: Role of actilyse in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis 61 Figure 4 Failed thrombolysis in a 42 year old male patient. (A&B) Venogram obtained before thrombolysis shows complete thrombosis of the right superficial femoral vein, the iliac veins and the IVC (arrows), with venous return through collaterals. (C&D) Venogram obtained 72 h after thrombolysis showing complete lysis of the thrombus at the SFV, with partial lysis at the common femoral vein and the external iliac vein (short arrow). No lysis at the common iliac vein and the IVC (long arrows). (E) CT axial cuts and (F) coronal reconstruction showing thrombosed both common iliac veins (arrows in E) and IVC (arrow in F). This therapy can potentially help prevent long term sequelae of DVT. Delivery of the thrombolytic agent directly into the thrombus offers substantial advantages over systemic administration of a thrombolytic agent, which may fail to reach and penetrate occluded venous segment. Because thrombolytic agents activate plasminogin in the thrombus, delivery of the drug to that site enhances its effectiveness. In addition by focusing the delivery of higher concentration of the drug, lysis rates can be improved and the duration of treatment can be reduced. Subsequently complication associated with exposure of the patient to systemic thrombolytic therapy might be reduced [20]. In our study, the initial and long term results appear to be at least as good as those of other trials involving continuous infusion catheter directed thrombolytic therapy. In our study the degree of lysis was found to be a significant prediction of early and continued patency. Complete lysis was achieved in 82% in concordance with the study of Verhaeghe et al. [7] who were able to restore patency in 79% of thrombosed veins using rt-pa (alteplase); and with the study done by Chang et al. [21] who reported that 80% of his patients restored blood flow after thrombolysis therapy by using alteplase. Our results were significantly better than the result of Mewissen et al. [22] who achieved complete lysis rate in only 31% using urokinase. The discrepancy in the results here is mostly due to higher fibrin specificity of rt-pa (like actilyse and alteplase) than those of urokinase. In our study no patients would be classified as having developed the post thrombotic syndrome, because all patients are or were asymptomatic for the follow-up period of 12 months. Chang et al. [21] in their study reported similar result after using alteplase. They found that none of their patients experienced the post thrombotic syndrome or recurrent thromboembolism. In contrary Prandoni et al. [23] who use anticoagulant alone (heparin) found that the incidence of post thrombotic syndrome was 18% at 1 year and almost 25% at 2 years. In addition our study showed no recurrence in a mean follow-up period of 12 months and no patients were classified as having developed rethrombosis. This was in contrast to the study of Mewissen et al. [22] using Urokinase who found that almost half of their successfully treated patients had sites of loss of patency or re-occlusion 6 12 months after treatment. In another study done by Prandoni et al. [23] they reported a high percentage of recurrence of about 17% in patients with DVT treated with anticoagulant alone. Our result was similar to that of Chang et al. [21] study who reported no recurrent thrombosis after months of follow up of their patients using alteplase as thrombolytic agents. In our opinion, this is mostly due to the use of actilyse which is most specific and effective than other thrombolytic agents. Although there are many effective thrombolytic agents, actilyse (recombinant human tissue-type plasminogin activator) is a serine protease that is produced by recombinant DNA technology and that is chemically identical to human endogenous rt-pa. It acts by stimulating fibrinolysis of blood thrombi it promotes the binding of plasminogin to the fibrin thrombus in conjunction with the increased affinity of fibrinbound rt PA for plasminogin and it facilitates the ordered adsorption of plasminogin and its activator to the fibrin surface [24], it has two characteristics that make it preferable to intra clot treatment of DVT; its binding affinity for fibrin and its short half life (approximately 5 min) in the general circulation. Because it binds to the fibrin in a thrombus, actilyse, unlike streptokinase and urokinase, does not need to be administered by continuous intra clot infusion. Although ex-

62 M. Gomaa et al. cess actilyse diffuse from the clot into the circulation it is cleared within 2 h after intra clot installation because of its short half life. Catheter directed thrombolysis has two drawbacks: it is labor invasive and there is the bleeding risk [7]. During our study we encountered only echomosis at the puncture site in 10 of 28 patients. It represents 35 percent which is less than the percentage of bleeding found by Verhaegue et al. [7] study who stated 12 patients (50 percent) bleeding at the puncture site with 6 needing blood transfusion. This is mostly due to use of a low to medium dose of actilyse (1 mg/h up to 1.5 mg/h) in comparison to Verhaege et al. [7] who used a high dose of 3 mg/h, so low dose and continuous needle access under the ultrasound guidance are mandatory to avoid the inadvertent puncture of adjacent vessels such as popliteal artery. We only used popliteal vein as the venous access site. It allows ante grade catheter traversal of the deep venous valve, which can be difficult and potentially traumatic to the leaflets when retrograde passage is used. We did not use IVC filter since the use of IVC filter during thrombolysis has been questioned because of the low incidence of complication that occurs when lysis is performed without filter protection [25]. In conclusion, catheter directed thrombolysis using actilyse appears promising and can be used to dissolve the thrombus safely and effectively from the deep veins of patients with symptomatic lower limb DVT. Thrombolytic therapy has the potential for protecting the patient against chronic venous insufficiency and is related to the achievement and maintenance of patency and the preservation of valve function. The long term benefits of this form of therapy are promising wherever long term follow-up to 5 year studies are necessary to evaluate the frequency of chronic venous insufficiency. References [1] Juhan CM, Alimi YS, Barthelemy PE, et al. Late results of ileo venous thrombectomy. J Vasc surg 1997;25:417 22. [2] Augustinas P, Ouriel K. Invasive approaches to treatment of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004;110:1 34. [3] Goldhaber SZ, Elliot CG. Acute pulmonary embolism: part II: risk stratification, treatment and prevention. Circulation 2003;108:2834 8. [4] Comerota A, Aldridge SC. Thrombolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis: a clinical review. Can J surg 1993;36:359 64. [5] Hull RD, Raskob GE, Rosenbloom D, et al. Heparin for 5 days as compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1260 4. [6] Roumen-Klappe EM, den Heijer M, et al. Inflammatory response in the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:701 6. [7] Verhaeghe R, Stockx L, Lacroix H, et al. Catheter-directed lysis of ileo-femoral vein thrombosis with use of rt.pa. Eur Radiol 1997;7:996 1001. [8] Forster A, Wells P. Tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity: a systematic review. Chest 2001;119:572 9. [9] Wakefield TW. Treatment options of venous thrombosis: invited review. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:613 20. [10] Van Breda A, Katzen BT, Deutsch AS. Urokinase versus streptokinase in local thrombolysis. Radiology 1987;165:109 11. [11] Sharafuddin MJ, Sun S, Hoballah JJ, et al. Endovascular management of venous thrombotic and occlusive disease of the lower extremities. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:405 23. [12] Bosson JL, Labarere J, Sevestre MA, et al. Deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients hospitalized in sub acute care facilities: a multicenter cross-sectional study of risk factors, prophylaxis and prevalence. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2613 8. [13] Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:122 30. [14] Arcelus JI, Caprini JA, Monreal M, et al. The management and outcome of acute venous thromboembolism: a prospective registry including 4011 patients. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:916 22. [15] Cheng CP, Herfkens RJ, Tayler CA. Abdominal aortic hemodynamic conditions in healthy subjects aged 50 70 at rest and during lower limb exercise: in vivo quantification using MRI. Atherosclerosis 2003;168:323 31. [16] Breddin HK, Hach-Wonderle V, Nakov R, et al. Effects of a low molecular weight heparin on thrombus regression and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:626 31. [17] Goldhaber SZ. Modern treatment of pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2002;35:225 75. [18] Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. The post thrombotic syndrome: current knowledge controversies and directions for future research. Blood Rev 2002;16:155 65. [19] Ziegler S, Schillinger M, Maca TH, et al. Post thrombotic syndrome after primary event of deep venous thrombosis 10 to 20 years ago. Thromb Res 2001;101:23 33. [20] Semba CP, Dake MD. Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: aggressive therapy with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Radiology 1994;191:487 94. [21] Chang R, Chen C, Kam A, et al. Deep vein thrombolysis of lower extremity; direct intra clot injection of alteplase, once daily with systemic anticoagulation-result of pilot study. Radiology 2008;246:619 29. [22] Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, et al. Catheter directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology 1999;211:39 49. [23] Prandoni P, Villalta S, Bagatella P, et al. The clinical course of deep vein thrombosis: prospective long term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. Hematologic 1997;82:423 8. [24] Horne 3rd MK, Mayo DJ, Cannon RO, et al. Intraclot recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis of the lower and upper extremities. Am J MED 2000;108(3):251 5. [25] Asch MR. Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology 2002;225:835 44.