MYE FORMS REVEALED RESPONSE CODES OBJECTIVES. Stringent Complete Response (scr) Complete Response (CR) I have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Similar documents
FAQs- Janet s Inbox. Janet Brunner, PA-C Wed. Feb. 26, 2014 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1.

Tracking Disease Status for Multiple Myeloma

SWOG ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROFESSIONAL (ORP) MANUAL RESPONSE ASSESSMENT MYELOMA CHAPTER 11C REVISED: SEPTEMBER 2016

Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) Pre-HCT Data

2016: Plasma Cell Disorders Pre-HCT Data

Instructions for Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) Post-HCT Data (Form 2116 Revision 3)

Criteria for Disease Assessment Joan Bladé

If unqualified, Complete remission is considered to be Haematological complete remission

If unqualified, Complete remission is considered to be Haematological complete remission

Management of Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Paradigm

Forms Revision: Myeloma Changes

Supplementary Appendix

Importancia del laboratorio en el seguimiento clínico de pacientes con mieloma múltiple

I Need Treatment First-Line WM Treatments & Side Effects IWMF Educational Forum Grapevine, TX 5/1/2015

Management of Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Paradigm

Management of Multiple Myeloma

Myeloma: Are We on the Brink of a Cure? Jeffrey Wolf, MD Director, Myeloma Program University of California, San Francisco

M-Protien, what to do next? Ismail A Sharif MD, FRCPc Internal Medicine Day 22 nd April 2016

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 9: , 2015

Is Transplant a Necessity or a Choice: Focus on the necessity for CR and MRD

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. A Case Study

Treatment of Relapsed. A Case Study

Managing Myeloma Virtual Grand Rounds Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Eligible Patient. Case Study

Myeloma Support Group: Now and the Horizon. Brian McClune, DO

Serum Free Light Chains should be the target of response evaluation in light chain myeloma rather than urines: results from the IFM 2009 trial

Current management of multiple myeloma. Jorge J. Castillo, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

Citation for published version (APA): Hovenga, S. (2007). Clinical and biological aspects of Multiple Myeloma s.n.

Major Diagnostic Criteria

Laboratory Examination

Sheena Surindran Grand Rounds 2/15/11

The Paraprotein. Evaluating Paraproteinemia. Conditions Associated with PP. Paraprotein Structure

Module 3: Multiple Myeloma Induction and Transplant Strategies Treatment Planning

Evaluating Paraproteinemia

Hematology 101. Rachid Baz, M.D. 5/16/2014

Multiple Myeloma 101: Understanding Your Labs

Multiple Myeloma (MM)

PLASMA CELL NEOPLASIA. Michael Miller, MD & Ajaz Shawl, MD

Review of the recent publications from the French group of myeloma on urine vs serum FLC analysis in MM

Jo Abraham MD Division of Nephrology University of Utah

LONDON CANCER NEWS DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW

Management Update: Multiple Myeloma. Presented by Prof. Dr. Khan Abul Kalam Azad Professor of Medicine Dhaka Medical College

Multiple Myeloma: Induction, Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy

Suspecting Tumors, or Could it be cancer?

Cancer Research Group Version Date: June 22, 2016 NCI Update Date: November 13, Schema

Refractory M ultiple Multiple M yeloma Myeloma

New IMWG Response Criteria

International Myeloma Foundation Patient and Family Seminar

Reviewed by Dr. Michelle Geddes (Staff Hematologist, University of Calgary) and Dr. Matt Cheung (Staff Hematologist, University of Toronto)

Serum free light chain (SFLC) assays. Dr Sarah Sasson SydPath Registrar

Clinical Case Study Discussion: Maintenance in MM

Smoldering Myeloma: Leave them alone!

Role of Maintenance and Consolidation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Patient-centered Approach

Case Study Discussions on the Nurse s Role in Caring for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Should we treat Smoldering MM patients? María-Victoria Mateos University Hospital of Salamanca Salamanca. Spain

Amyloidosis: What to do and how to diagnose: An Update 2017

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ) Multiple Myeloma. Version NCCN.org

MULTIDISCIPLINARY MULTIPLE MYELOMA CARE

Case 1: Mrs. MG. ANCO Hematologic Malignancies Update: Acute leukemias, MDS and myeloma

Multiple myeloma. November 24, 2017 at Vientiane, Laos

Induction Therapy & Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma

Hevylite assays de - convoluted. Dr Karthik Ramasamy Oxford University Hospitals

Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging

Anaemias and other Pesky Haematology Questions

Instructions for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Post-HSCT Data (Form 2113)

Velcade (bortezomib)

Autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma after VAD and EDAP courses: a high incidence of oligoclonal serum Igs post transplantation

Bortezomib and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Center for Amyloidosis and Acute Phase Proteins, University College London Medical School, UK

Hematology Case Conference 8/5/03

Velcade (bortezomib)

Bortezomib (Velcade)

Case #1. Robert J. Glinert, M.D. David C. Fisher, M.D. Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Understanding the Serum Free Light Chain Assays. Anne L Sherwood, PhD Director of Scientific Affairs The Binding Site, Inc.

VAD Regimen as Front Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Blood and Marrow Transplant Program One Medical Center Dr. Lebanon, NH Phone: (603) Fax: (603)

Myeloma: Are We on the Brink of a Cure?

Original article. Introduction

Multiple myeloma Biological & Clinical Aspects Isabelle Vande Broek, MD, PhD

Successful Treatment of Immunoglobulin D Myeloma by Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Therapy

Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone- attenuated (CTDa) MMWOS003/01 Indication Oral treatment for multiple myeloma

Curing Myeloma So Close and Yet So Far! Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham

Background Information

EBMT2008_22_44:EBMT :26 Pagina 424 CHAPTER 27. HSCT for primary amyloidosis in adults. J. Esteve

MM relaps efter min. 3 linie behandlinger.

Importance of Achieving a Complete Response in Multiple Myeloma, and the Impact of Novel Agents Asher A. Chanan-Khan and Sergio Giralt

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ) Multiple Myeloma. NCCN Evidence Blocks. Version November 22, NCCN.

The ABCs of Waldenström s Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Primary Treatment

CONSENSUS DOCUMENT FOR MANAGEMENT OF MUTIPLE MYELOMA

Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (LYM) Post-Infusion Data

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 12: (2006) 2006 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Melphalan, Prednisolone and Thalidomide (MPT) MMWOS001/01 Indication Oral treatment for multiple myeloma

Southern Derbyshire Shared Care Pathology Guidelines. MGUS (Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance)

Minimal residual disease. Bruno Paiva University of Navarra, Spain

Multiple Myeloma: Miami, FL Current Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions December 18, 2009

Neutrophil Recovery: The. Posttransplant Recovery. Bus11_1.ppt

Choosing upfront and salvage therapy for myeloma in the ASEAN context

Transcription:

I have no conflicts of interest to disclose MYE FORMS REVEALED Janet Brunner, PA-C CIBMTR MKE New10_1.ppt OBJECTIVES 1) Be able to describe the criteria required for each myeloma response code 2) Be able to identify the appropriate baseline studies to use when determining response to therapy for myeloma patients 3) Be able to report the proper response code when two consecutive assessments have not been obtained during the same reporting period RESPONSE CODES New10_2.ppt Complete Response (CR) Negative immunofixation on serum and urine samples (this is required) Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow (confirmation with repeat marrow biopsy not needed) Stringent Complete Response (scr) Negative immunofixation on serum and urine samples (this is required) Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow (confirmation with repeat marrow biopsy not needed) PLUS.. 1

Normal free light chain ratio, and Absence of clonal cells in the bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Serum & urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, but not on electrophoresis (i.e. SPEP or UPEP) or >90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours Partial Response (PR) >50% reduction in serum M-protein and Reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >90% or to <200 mg/24 hours Stable Disease (SD) Not meeting the criteria for CR, VGPR, PR or PD Progressive Disease (PD) Requires one or more of the following: Increase of >25% from baseline in serum M- protein and/or an absolute increase >0.5 g/dl Increase of >25% from baseline in urine M- protein and/or an absolute increase >200 mg/24 hours For recipients without measurable serum & urine M-protein levels: an absolute increase of >10 mg/dl in the difference between involved & uninvolved free light chain levels Relapse from CR (Rel) Requires one or more of the following: Reappearance of serum or urine M- protein by immunofixation or electrophoresis Development of >5% plasma cells in the bone marrow Appearance of any other sign of progression (e.g. new plasmacytomas, lytic bone lesion, hypercalcemia) 2

Definition of Measurable Disease Measurable disease is defined by at least one of the following three measurements: Serum M-protein >/= 1 gram/dl (based on SPEP and not SIFE) Urine M-protein >/=200 mg/24 hrs Serum FLC assay: Involved FLC level >/=10 mg/dl provided the serum FLC ratio is abnormal Measurable vs. non-measurable disease is determined at diagnosis What happens when you have a patient without measurable disease? When trying to determine a PR, a >50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of the M-protein, provided the baseline bone marrow plasma cells was >30% In addition, a >50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required, if present at baseline. Reporting a Response Code Reporting a response code (scr, CR, VGPR, PR, SD or PD) requires two consecutive assessments made at any time before the institution of any new therapy & no evidence of progression or new bone lesions if radiographic studies were performed; Note- radiographic studies are not required to satisfy scr, CR, VGPR, PR, SD or PD requirements. continued Relapse requires two consecutive assessments made at any time before classification as relapse, and/or the institution of any new therapy What is the proper response code to report when two consecutive assessments have not been obtained in the same reporting period? Keep in mind the six week interval between consecutive assessments is no longer required 3

Example A 60 year old WM receives an Auto PBSC HSCT for Multiple Myeloma. At Day +100, it is determined that he has achieved a VGPR in response to the HSCT. He s monitored on a monthly basis & on the last set of labs obtained at the time of his 6 month f/u visit he now meets the criteria for CR. He s doing well and does not return for f/u until 3 months later. Labs at that time confirm that he is in CR. He remains in CR for 2 more years. What is the proper response code to report at 6 months? A) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Complete Remission (CR) D)Stable Disease (SD) Survey says (A) When there hasn t been a second assessment in the same reporting period to confirm the response, you report the disease status that was previously confirmed. In this example, you would report VGPR at 6 months. At 1 year, you would report the CR & the date when the CR was first documented. In other words, even though documentation of response requires a confirmatory measurement, the start time for date of response is the first date at which the response was noted. Case #1 Case Studies Patient received planned maintenance therapy (Revlimid) starting on Day 100. A F2116 (Myeloma Post-HSCT) comes due at 6 months. Q20- Was planned treatment per protocol given since the date of the last report? YES (Revlimid) Q48-49- Best response to line of therapy need to be answered. What baseline studies would you use to determine the response he/she may have had to the Revlimid? 4

Case #1 A) Use the labs obtained prior to starting Revlimid B) Use the labs obtained at diagnosis C) Use the labs obtained immediately prior to the start of the preparative regimen for HSCT Survey says.. (B) Case #2 A patient is diagnosed with IgG kappa myeloma. M-spike =6000 mg/l (from SPEP) 24-hr urine M-protein = 1000 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow biopsy had 40% plasma cells. Patient was treated with Velcade, Doxil & Dexamethasone for 4 cycles Patient was re-evaluated after the 4 th cycle of VDD. The M-spike = 2400 mg/l & there were 15% plasma cells on the bone marrow biopsy. The patient achieved a PR. The patient received Cytoxan for autologous stem cell mobilization. The next set of labs were obtained immediately prior to the start of the prep regimen. The M-spike = 1600 mg/l & 8% plasma cells were noted on the bone marrow biopsy. What is the patient s disease status immediately prior to the start of the preparative regimen? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Very Good Partial Remission i (VGPR) C) Partial Remission (PR) D)I don t know- not enough information provided to make determination Survey says.. (C) Case #3 The recipient from case #2 has had their autologous HSCT. Lab studies are obtained at 60 & 100 days post HSCT. SPEP/UPEP are negative for an M-spike at Day 60 & 100 Serum & Urine Immunofixation are positive for IgG kappa at Day 60 & 100 Bone marrow biopsy <5% plasma cells at Day 100 Case #3 What disease response code would you report for this recipient at 100 days post-hsct? A) Partial Remission (PR) B) Very Good Partial Remission i (VGPR) C) Complete Remission (CR) D) None of the above Survey says.. (B) 5

A 55 year old AA male is diagnosed with IgG lambda myeloma. Results of the initial work-up include- Serum M-spike = 4000 mg/l 24-hr urine M-protein = 1000 mg/24 hr Bone marrow biopsy = 60% plasma cells Patient receives 2 cycles of Revlimid & Dexamethasone & then re-evaluated Serum M-spike = 2000 mg/l 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hr What is the patient s disease response after two cycles of Rev/Dex? A) Partial Remission (PR) B) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) C) Stable Disease (SD) Survey says (A) The patient s PR status was confirmed with a 2 nd measurement. The patient received two additional cycles of Rev/Dex & then re-evaluated for disease response. Serum M-spike = 2900 mg/l 24-hr urine M-protein = 600 mg/24 hr Bone marrow biopsy = 30% plasma cells What is the patient s disease response after a total of 4 cycles of Rev/Dex? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Progressive Disease (PD) C) Partial Remission (PR) Survey says (B) Patient is switched to Vincristine, Adriamycin & Decadron (VAD) and is reevaluated after two cycles. Serum M-spike = 1400 mg/l 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hr Bone marrow biopsy = 15% plasma cells The plan is to give IV Cytoxan mobilization. What is the patient s disease response to the 2 cycles of VAD? The patient has achieved a PR after two cycles of VAD. What studies were used as a baseline to make that determination? A) The studies obtained at diagnosis B) The studies obtained at time of progression C) The studies obtained after first two cycles of Rev/Dex Survey says (B) 6

The patient has undergone their autologous PBSC HSCT & has been evaluated monthly for the 1 st three months post HSCT. Day +30 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 1000 mg/l Serum immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow biopsy = 7% plasma cells Day +60 evaluation: SPEP/UPEP- no monoclonal band Serum/Urine immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine for M-protein = 90 mg/24 hrs Day +100 evaluation: SPEP/UPEP- no monoclonal band Serum/Urine immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine for M-protein = 90 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow biopsy <5% plasma cells What is the best disease response to HSCT that you would report at Day +100 for this patient? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Partial Remission i (PR) C) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) D)Complete Remission (CR) Survey says.. (C) Insights from Dr. Hari regarding Formal vs. Practical Response Assessments Many centers are not doing 24-hr urine studies on myeloma patients anymore. Disease response criteria for PR requires a >50% reduction in the serum M-protein and a reduction in the 24-hr urine M-protein by >90% or to <200 mg/24 hrs. How should data managers handle these types of situations? Dr Hari s response.. If the patient s main paraprotein is in the serum, then I tell them to go ahead and use the serum alone for PR vs. no response, etc. If it is CR that we are looking for, then I insist on urine studies. If a 24-hr urine was not done at least a random urine has to be immunofixation (IFE) negative. 7

If the patient has light chain only disease & the urine was the major site of disease, one will not be able to assess for a response without urine studies. Currently, the response criteria do not allow serum free light chain studies as a substitute for urine studies. 8