LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Similar documents
Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Lipoprotein(a), PCSK9 Inhibition and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

The FOURIER Trial. On behalf of the FOURIER Investigators. American Heart Association Scientific Sessions November 13, 2017

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Antithrombotic Therapy for Long-Term Secondary Prevention Considerations for Long-Term DAPT

Fasting or non fasting?

Does IMPROVE-IT & FOURIER Confirm or Refute the LDL Hypothesis?

FOURIER Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

EVIDENCE TO DATE EVOLOCUMAB (REPATHA)

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

FOURIER. Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk

Workshop. Todd Anderson MD / Jacques Genest MD

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

THIERS CHAGAS BAHIA FOURIER- ESTUDO DE INIBIÇÃO DA PCSK9 EM PACIENTES DE ALTO RISCO CARDIOVASCULAR

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

ACC NY Cardiovascular Symposium

Paradim Shift in cholesterol behandeling: van LDL-C target naar LDL-C eradicatie

Zürcher Herzkurs, New drugs and interactions. LDL - what else?

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

A new era in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD)?

Problem patients in primary care Patient 4: Peripheral artery disease

The Changing Landscape of Managing Patients with PAD- Update on the Evidence and Practice of Care in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors for stroke prevention

Disclosures. Objectives. Cardiovascular Risk. Patient Case. JUPITER: The final frontier in statin utilization or an idea from outer space?

Medical Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease

2/26/19. Secondary Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Incorporating Evolving Data to Individualize Care. Disclosures. Faculty

Reducing Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

7 th Munich Vascular Conference

Indicações para um inibidor de PCSK9

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Landmesser U et al. Eur Heart J 2017; /eurheartj/ehx549

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald and Beta- Quantification of LDL-C in Patients in FOURIER

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

New Horizons in Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

2016 ESC/EAS Guideline in Dyslipidemias: Impact on Treatment& Clinical Practice

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Cardiovascular safety & efficacy of lorcaserin in overweight and obese patients Primary results from the CAMELLIA- TIMI 61 Trial

No relevant financial relationships

Cardiovascular safety & efficacy of lorcaserin in overweight and obese patients Primary results from the CAMELLIATIMI 61 Trial

Using DOACs in CAD Patients in Sinus Ryhthm Results of the ATLAS ACS 2, COMPASS and COMMANDER-HF Trials

Update on Lipid Guidelines and Intense Treatment of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibitors Carl J. Lavie, MD,FACC,FACP,FCCP

Claudication Treatment Comparative Effectiveness: 6 Month Outcomes from the CLEVER Study

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Razionale ed evidenze scientifiche di Doppia Antiaggregazione Piastrinica a lungo termine nel Paziente con Sindrome Coronarica Acuta

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

Misperceptions still exist that cardiovascular disease is not a real problem for women.

The earlier BP control the better cardiovascular outcome. Jin Oh Na Cardiovascular center Korea University Medical College

New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Lipids: Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Poised for a Breakthrough?

Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

Optimal medical treatment for polyvascular patient

Hyperlipidemia Guidelines: What s New in 2015? Eva Lonn, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine

Cholesterol, guidelines, targets and new medications

Effects of Lowering LDL Cholesterol on Progression of Kidney Disease

Eugene Barrett M.D., Ph.D. University of Virginia 6/18/2007. Diagnosis and what is it Glucose Tolerance Categories FPG

Investor Conference Call

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

Peripheral Artery Disease Compendium

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Lipids & Hypertension Update

STATINS FOR PAD Long - term prognosis

surtout qui n est PAS à risque?

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

How would you manage Ms. Gold

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

Cholesterol verlaging (om cardiovasculair risico te verlagen)

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

Managing Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk: Using the Data to Optimize Care

Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the CANVAS Program

Inflammation and and Heart Heart Disease in Women Inflammation and Heart Disease

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Supplementary Online Content

Calculating RR, ARR, NNT

Educational Objectives. Disease Trajectories and CVD Risk Reduction. Hypercholesterolemia Support for LDL-C Causality

Transcription:

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial Marc P. Bonaca, Patrice Nault, Robert P. Giugliano, Anthony C. Keech, Armando Lira Pineda, Estella Kanevsky, Julia Kuder, Sabina A. Murphy, J. Wouter Jukema, Basil S. Lewis, Lale Tokgozoglu, Ransi Somaratne, Peter S. Sever, Terje R. Pedersen, Marc S. Sabatine for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators American Heart Association Annual Scientific Session Late-Breaking Science in Prevention November 13, 2017

Trial Design 27,564 high-risk, stable patients with established CV disease (prior MI, prior stroke, or symptomatic ) Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in High or moderate intensity statin therapy (± ezetimibe) LDL-C 70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l) or non-hdl-c 100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l) Evolocumab SC 140 mg Q2W or 420 mg QM RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND Placebo SC Q2W or QM Follow-up Q 12 weeks Median f/up 2.2 yrs PEP: CVD, MI, Stroke, UA, Coronary Revascularization Key Secondary EP: CVD, MI, Stroke Sabatine MS et al. Am Heart J 2016;173:94-101

KM Rate (%) at 3 Years Summary of Effects of PCSK9i Evolocumab LDL-C by 59% to a median of 30 mg/dl CV outcomes in patients on statin Safe and well-tolerated Placebo 59% reduction P<0.00001 Absolute 56 mg/dl 15 10 HR 0.85 (0.79-0.92) P<0.0001 14.6 12.6 HR 0.80 (0.73-0.88) P<0.0001 9.9 7.9 Evolocumab (median 30 mg/dl, IQR 19-46 mg/dl) 5 0 CVD, MI, stroke UA, cor revasc CVD, MI, stroke Sabatine MS et al. NEJM 2017;376:1713-22

Background & Objectives Patients with lower extremity are at heightened risk of adverse cardiovascular (MACE) and limb events (MALE) Statin vs. Placebo reduces CV risk and peripheral revascularization & observational studies suggest reductions in amputations In patients with on statins: Does further reducing LDL-C reduce CV risk? Does lowering LDL-C reduce the risk of MALE? We investigated: CV risk and the absolute benefit of evolocumab in patients with MALE risk and whether it was modified by evolocumab Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group J Vasc Surg 2007; Kumbhani DJ et al. EHJ 2014

Methods Patients qualified with if either: Intermittent claudication and ABI < 0.85 Prior peripheral revascularization or amputation for ischemia Primary analysis in prespecified subgroup with sensitivity excluding patients with prior MI or stroke to see if benefits extend to alone MALE defined as composite of acute limb ischemia (ALI), major amputation (AKA or BKA), or urgent revascularization; MACE defined as composite of CVD, MI or stroke

27,564 Patients with Atherosclerosis Randomized Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease 69% Intermittent Claudication & ABI < 0.85 at Baseline 57% Peripheral Revascularization (Median 3.7 years prior) 3,642 Patients with Symptomatic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease 42% 1517 26% 955 27% 1,044 1,505 Patients with Symptomatic Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease and no prior MI or Stroke 27 19 41 39 4% Amputation for Ischemia

Baseline Characteristics MI or Stroke and no N=23,922 N=3,642 Age, median (IQR) 63 (56, 69) 64 (58, 69) Female sex (%) 24 28 History Hypertension (%) 79 85 Current Smoker (%) 27 36 History of Diabetes (%) 36 43 History of Stroke (%) 20 15 History of Myocardial Infarction (%) 86 50 Statin, High/Moderate (%) 69 / 30 69 / 31 Antiplatelet therapy (%) 93 89 Anticoagulant therapy (%) 8 11 ACE-I or ARB use at baseline (%) 78 76 All p-values < 0.05 except statin use/intensity (p=0.57) Statin dose at baseline missing in 10 (0.0%) without and 3 (0.1%) with

CVD / MI / Stroke CVD / MI / Stroke 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% Peripheral Artery Disease and Risk in Placebo Patients with MI/Stroke N=1036 N=1784 no MI/Stroke N=748 MI or Stroke and no N=11996 MI or Stroke and no N=11996 Adjusted HR 1.81 (1.53 2.14) P<0.001 13.0% 7.6% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 14.9% P=0.0028 10.3% P=0.0001 7.6% 4% 4% 2% 2% 0% 0 180 360 540 720 900 Days from Randomization 0% 0 180 360 540 720 900 Days from Randomization adjusted age, sex, race, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, egfr, CHF, prior MI, CABG/PCI, and history of stroke or TIA.

CV Death, MI or Stroke CV Death, MI or Stroke in Patients with and without Peripheral Artery Disease 14% 12% 10% Placebo Evolocumab N=3,642 27% RRR HR 0.73 (0.59 0.91) P=0.0040 13.0% 9.5% 3.5% ARR NNT 2.5y 29 8% 6% 7.6% 6.2% No 1.4% ARR NNT 2.5y 72 4% No N=23,922 2% HR 0.81 95% CI (0.73 0.90) P<0.001 0% p-interaction = 0.41 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from Randomization

CV Death, MI or Stroke CV Death, MI or Stroke in Patients with and no MI or Stroke Placebo Evolocumab (no MI/stroke, N=1505) 12% 10% 8% 43% RRR HR 0.57 (0.38 0.88) P=0.0095 10.3% 4.8% ARR NNT 2.5y 21 6% 5.5% 4% 2% 0% 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from Randomization Outcome HR 95% CI MACE 0.57 (0.38 0.88) CV Death 0.78 (0.39 1.57) MI 0.66 (0.38 1.14) Stroke 0.30 (0.11 0.82)

Major Adverse Limb Events Major Adverse Limb Events 0.5% 0.4% Placebo Evolocumab All Patients N=27,564 42% RRR HR 0.58 (0.38 0.88) P=0.0093 0.45% 0.3% 0.27% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% Outcome HR 95% CI MALE 0.58 (0.38 0.88) ALI or major amputation 0.52 (0.31 0.89) ALI 0.55 (0.31 0.97) Major amputation 0.57 (0.17 1.95) Urgent revascularization 0.69 (0.38 1.26) 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from Randomization

Major Adverse Limb Events Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients with and without Known 2.5% Known HR 0.63 95% CI (0.39 1.03) P-interaction 0.29 0.25% 2.4% No Known HR 0.37 95% CI (0.16 0.88) 2.0% 0.20% 0.16% 1.5% 1.5% 0.15% 1.0% 0.10% 0.076% 0.5% 0.05% 0.0% 0 180 360 540 720 900 0.00% Days from Randomization 0 180 360 540 720 900 Placebo Evolocumab

Major Adverse Limb Events Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients with and no MI or Stroke 3.0% Placebo Evolocumab (no MI/stroke, N=1505) 57% RRR 2.5% 2.0% HR 0.43 (0.19 0.99) P=0.042 2.6% 1.3% ARR 1.5% 1.0% 1.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from Randomization

Achieved LDL-C and Major Adverse Limb Events MALE p-value = 0.0257 for slope 0.0125 P=0.026 for beta coefficient Adjusted Event Rate (probability) 0.0100 0.0075 0.0050 0.0025 0 50 100 150 LDL-C (mg/dl) at 1 month adjusted for significant (p<0.05) predictors of LDL-C cholesterol at 1 month after randomization including age, BMI, LDL-C at baseline, male sex, race, randomized in North America, current smoker, high intensity statin.

MACE or MALE MACE or MALE In Patients with and without 16% 14% 12% 10% Placebo Evolocumab N=3,642 27% N=3,642 RRR HR HR 0.73 0.73 95% (0.60 CI (0.60 0.88) 0.88) P=0.0014 P=0.0014 15.0% 10.9% 4.1% ARR 4.1% ARR NNT 25 NNT 2.5y 25 8% 6% 7.8% 6.3% No No 1.5% ARR NNT 2.5y 67 67 4% 2% 0% Days from Randomization No N=23,922 HR 0.80 95% CI (0.72 0.89) P<0.001 p-interaction = 0.39 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900

MACE or MALE MACE or MALE In Patients with and no MI or Stroke Placebo Evolocumab (no MI/stroke, N=1505) 14% 48% RRR 12.8% 12% 10% HR 0.52 (0.35 0.76) P=0.0006 6.3% ARR NNT 2.5y 16 8% 6% 6.5% 4% 2% 0% 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from Randomization

Summary Patients with are at heightened risk of MACE and MALE LDL-C lowering with evolocumab in patients with : Reduces major adverse CV events with robust ARR Reduces major adverse limb events Benefits extend to without prior MI or stroke with an ARR for MACE or MALE of 6.3% (NNT 16) at 2.5 years

Conclusion LDL-C reduction to very low levels should be considered in patients with, regardless of history of MI or stroke, to reduce the risk of MACE and MALE For more information see simultaneous publication in: