School Autonomy and Regression Discontinuity Imbalance

Similar documents
What is: regression discontinuity design?

Lecture II: Difference in Difference and Regression Discontinuity

Impact Evaluation Methods: Why Randomize? Meghan Mahoney Policy Manager, J-PAL Global

Is Knowing Half the Battle? The Case of Health Screenings

Understanding Regression Discontinuity Designs As Observational Studies

POL 574: Quantitative Analysis IV

Lecture II: Difference in Difference. Causality is difficult to Show from cross

Regression Discontinuity Suppose assignment into treated state depends on a continuously distributed observable variable

Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)

Establishing Causality Convincingly: Some Neat Tricks

The fixed effects regression model is commonly used to reduce selection bias in the

EMPIRICAL STRATEGIES IN LABOUR ECONOMICS

Empirical Strategies

Recent advances in non-experimental comparison group designs

TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO ACTION. Why randomize? Dan Levy. Harvard Kennedy School

Early Release from Prison and Recidivism: A Regression Discontinuity Approach *

Assessing Studies Based on Multiple Regression. Chapter 7. Michael Ash CPPA

THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS ON TURNOUT OF POSITIVELY VERSUS NEGATIVELY FRAMED VOTER MOBILIZATION APPEALS

This exam consists of three parts. Provide answers to ALL THREE sections.

Causal Validity Considerations for Including High Quality Non-Experimental Evidence in Systematic Reviews

Module 14: Missing Data Concepts

Next: An Improved Method for Identifying Impacts in Regression Discontinuity Designs

Empirical Strategies 2012: IV and RD Go to School

ECON Microeconomics III

What is Multilevel Modelling Vs Fixed Effects. Will Cook Social Statistics

Which Comparison-Group ( Quasi-Experimental ) Study Designs Are Most Likely to Produce Valid Estimates of a Program s Impact?:

Reputations and Firm Performance: Evidence From the Dialysis Industry

Empirical Strategies

Confounding by indication developments in matching, and instrumental variable methods. Richard Grieve London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

ICPSR Causal Inference in the Social Sciences. Course Syllabus

Applied Quantitative Methods II

Instrumental Variables Estimation: An Introduction

Mastering Metrics: An Empirical Strategies Workshop. Master Joshway

A Comparative Analysis of Fertility Plateau In Egypt, Syria and Jordan: Policy Implications

Introduction to Applied Research in Economics Kamiljon T. Akramov, Ph.D. IFPRI, Washington, DC, USA

Title: New Perspectives on the Synthetic Control Method. Authors: Eli Ben-Michael, UC Berkeley,

Recruitment and Retention of Teachers in Tennessee s Achievement School District and izone Schools

MEA DISCUSSION PAPERS

How is ethics like logistic regression? Ethics decisions, like statistical inferences, are informative only if they re not too easy or too hard 1

Rational Behavior in Cigarette Consumption: Evidence from the United States

Testing the Predictability of Consumption Growth: Evidence from China

How Much is Minnesota Like Wisconsin? Assumptions and Counterfactuals in Causal Inference with Observational Data

Improving the Interpretation of Fixed Effects Regression Results

An Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Design

Chapter 6 Facilitating the Movement of Qualified Dental Graduates to Provide Dental Services Across ASEAN Member States

USING ELICITED CHOICE EXPECTATIONS TO PREDICT CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN SPECIFIED SCENARIOS

Combining the regression discontinuity design and propensity score-based weighting to improve causal inference in program evaluationjep_

Utility Maximization and Bounds on Human Information Processing

9699 SOCIOLOGY. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers.

BURSTED WOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL

Write your identification number on each paper and cover sheet (the number stated in the upper right hand corner on your exam cover).

Social Preferences of Young Adults in Japan: The Roles of Age and Gender

Understanding Uncertainty in School League Tables*

Measuring the Impacts of Teachers: Reply to Rothstein

%CEM: A SAS MACRO TO PERFORM COARSENED EXACT MATCHING

Regression Discontinuity Analysis

Econometric Game 2012: infants birthweight?

bivariate analysis: The statistical analysis of the relationship between two variables.

Assignment Research Article (in Progress)

The Effect of Extremes in Small Sample Size on Simple Mixed Models: A Comparison of Level-1 and Level-2 Size

This article analyzes the effect of classroom separation

ENDORSEMENT AREA: ATHLETIC ADMINISTRATION AND COACHING

Evaluation Models STUDIES OF DIAGNOSTIC EFFICIENCY

Zimbabwe Millennium Development Goals: 2004 Progress Report 28

Causality and Statistical Learning

Causality and Statistical Learning

Problem Set 5 ECN 140 Econometrics Professor Oscar Jorda. DUE: June 6, Name

Instrumental Variables I (cont.)

Difference-in-Differences

Regression Analysis II

Causal Methods for Observational Data Amanda Stevenson, University of Texas at Austin Population Research Center, Austin, TX

Effect of Drug Therapy on HEDIS Measurements of HbA 1c Control In Diabetes Patients

Pros. University of Chicago and NORC at the University of Chicago, USA, and IZA, Germany

How Bad Data Analyses Can Sabotage Discrimination Cases

Does Male Education Affect Fertility? Evidence from Mali

Risky Choice Decisions from a Tri-Reference Point Perspective

The one thing to note about Bazerman is that he brings deep and broad

Improving the Interpretation of Fixed Effects Regression Results

Bayesian versus maximum likelihood estimation of treatment effects in bivariate probit instrumental variable models

Program Evaluations and Randomization. Lecture 5 HSE, Dagmara Celik Katreniak

Economic and Social Council

Assessing Measurement Invariance in the Attitude to Marriage Scale across East Asian Societies. Xiaowen Zhu. Xi an Jiaotong University.

A Guide to Quasi-Experimental Designs

CREATING (??) A SAFETY CULTURE. Robert L Carraway, Darden School of Business 2013 Air Charter Safety Symposium February 2013

Researching recovery from mental health problems

Syllabus.

WWC Standards for Regression Discontinuity and Single Case Study Designs

Quantitative Analysis and Empirical Methods

WORKING PAPER SERIES

Chapter 1: Explaining Behavior

The Essential Role of Pair Matching in. Cluster-Randomized Experiments. with Application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation

Political Science 15, Winter 2014 Final Review

Abstract. Introduction A SIMULATION STUDY OF ESTIMATORS FOR RATES OF CHANGES IN LONGITUDINAL STUDIES WITH ATTRITION

Master of Science in Secondary Education Concentration: Athletic Administration and Coaching (Non-Teaching)

Atlanta Declaration for the Advancement of Women s Right of Access to Information

Matching pre-processing of splitballot. for the analysis of double standards. Bruno Arpino

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HEAPING-INDUCED BIAS IN REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS. Alan I. Barreca Jason M. Lindo Glen R. Waddell

Glossary From Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide, by Rachel Glennerster and Kudzai Takavarasha

Methods for Addressing Selection Bias in Observational Studies

Volume 36, Issue 3. David M McEvoy Appalachian State University

Transcription:

School Autonomy and Regression Discontinuity Imbalance Todd Kawakita 1 and Colin Sullivan 2 Abstract In this research note, we replicate and assess Damon Clark s (2009) analysis of school autonomy reform in the United Kingdom. Clark implements a regression discontinuity design to estimate the effect of vote-based school autonomy reform on pass rates in secondary school. We show that Clark s findings are flawed due to his failure to verify the assumptions of the regression discontinuity and reliance on the entire range of data rather than a narrow band near the threshold. Moreover, baseline covariates are severely imbalanced between the treatment and control groups, even at narrow bandwidths around the cutoff. We question Clark s use of the regression discontinuity design in estimating the impact of school autonomy. I. Introduction: School Autonomy in the United Kingdom School independence has become a salient issue in education reform in recent years. In the United States, reformers have touted the benefits of charter schools in part because of their autonomy in curriculum and staffing decisions. 3 Supporters further argue that local school control leverages knowledge of a community s needs, and that traditional schools are forced to use resources inefficiently. In the opposing camp, reformers have called for stricter oversight to ensure accountability for performance. A 1988 education reform in the United Kingdom made it possible for secondary school districts to hold a vote for Grant Maintained (GM) status - independence from regional authority. These elections for school autonomy were held at the discretion of the school board and were executed by secret postal ballot by parents of current students. A majority of voting parents was needed to obtain GM status. Schools that failed to meet the majority requirement were permitted to hold later ballots at two-year intervals. Damon Clark provides the first evidence of the success of grant maintained school autonomy in his 2009 article The Performance and Competitive Effects of School Autonomy. 4 Clark considers the set of school districts that held first time votes for autonomy between 1992 and 1997. Comparing the treatment group (those who attain GM status) and control group (those who do not) is not a straightforward matter: the schools that attain autonomy might differ systematically from those schools that do not in student achievement and composition prior to reform, or unobserved factors such as parental support for autonomy, 1 Harvard University Graduate School of Education 2 Harvard University Kennedy School of Government 3 Finn, Chester E., et al., Charter Schools in Action (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000). 4 Clark, Damon. The Performance and Competitive Effects of School Autonomy. The Journal of Political Economy 117.4 (August 2009): 745-783. 1

parental involvement in their children s education, or trust in the school administration. However, since school districts theoretically have no control over the outcome of the vote immediately around 50 percent, schools that barely fail to attain the majority vote should be a reasonable control group for those just above the cutoff. Exploiting this 50 percent vote threshold, Clark uses a regression discontinuity design to estimate the impact of school autonomy and concludes that freedom from local school district authority resulted in significant improvements in 10 th grade pass rates. Regression discontinuity (RD) is commonly used to estimate the effect of treatment that is assigned on the basis of a continuous variable exceeding a given threshold. As long as subjects do not have precise control over the assignment variable, a consequence of this is that the variation in treatment near the threshold is randomized as though from a randomized experiment. 5 Randomization around the threshold yields two comparable groups, a treatment and a control, which are balanced in their observed and unobserved characteristics. In order to verify this, Lee and Lemieux recommend that [as] in a randomized experiment, the distribution of observed baseline covariates should not change discontinuously at the threshold. 6 The researcher must also check the balance of observables between the groups as he includes observations further from the threshold, as these observations induce bias in the estimates. Selecting a bandwidth large enough to estimate the treatment effect yet narrow enough that the two groups are balanced is key to the success of the RD design. Using Clark s data and code, we review Clark s findings and check the balance of several covariates near the 50 percent vote cutoff. We find that rather than use a narrow balanced bandwidth, Clark includes the entire range of observations in his analysis. Moreover, many of the covariates have significant discontinuities and imbalance in their distributions, particularly in the area proximal to the cutoff. These findings are evidence of serious bias in Clark s estimates, and further question the validity of RD designs in electoral data. II. Covariate Imbalance The idealized regression discontinuity design estimates the treatment effect by a simple comparison of observations immediately above and below the cutoff. To include more observations and obtain more precise estimates, however, researchers generally must choose a range around the cutoff, known as the bandwidth. The bandwidth must encompass enough observations for a reasonably precise estimate, yet not bias the estimate with observations far from the cutoff. 7 A small bandwidth reduces bias but produces noisy estimates in the treatment effect. In his analysis, Clark uses the maximal bandwidth, 8 including all avail- 5 Lee, David S. and Thomas Lemieux. Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. NBER Working Paper 14723 (February 2009): 3. 6 Lee & Lemieux, 14. 7 Note that if observations far from the cutoff did not induce bias, a simple OLS would be sufficient to estimate the treatment effect. 8 A maximal or 100 percent bandwidth indicates that Clark uses all data within 50 percentage points to the left of the cutoff and within 50 percentage points to the right of the cutoff. Throughout our discussion of bandwidth, we assume that the bounds of the included range are symmetrical about the cutoff, although 2

able data to estimate the treatment effect. We assess this choice by examining multivariate imbalance and running local regression models at varying bandwidths. In Figure 1 we examine imbalance at variable bandwidths using L1, a measure of multivariate imbalance bounded between 0 and 1 with a larger fraction indicating greater imbalance. 9 Imbalance is lowest at bandwidths between 10 and 20 percent - wider bandwidths invite bias from the systematic differences between winning and losing schools. In light of this, Clark s choice of maximal bandwidth clearly leads to biased estimates. The higher imbalance at bandwidths below 10 percent also indicates differences between the small groups directly above and below the discontinuity, undermining the fundamental assumption of the regression discontinuity design altogether. Moreover, the presence of imbalance in several of the observed covariates suggests the possibility of more unobserved differences. L1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Univariate 2: base year pass rate Univariate 1: base year fsm Multivariate 1: base year pass rate, fsm, number of pupils, number of teachers Multivariate 2: base year pass rate, number of pupils, number of teachers 0 20 40 60 80 100 Vote Share (%) Figure 1: Multivariate Imbalance and Lower L1 indicates better balance, suggesting that bandwidths between 10 and 20 percent produce the most balanced. In Figure 2 we plot the difference in means for vote winners and losers at different bandwidths for base year observables: pass rates, FSM eligibility, and number of pupils. The differences in means would be zero in a perfectly balanced sample. The sample means of winning schools are substantially different from losing schools at bandwidths above 35 to the size of the treatment and control groups may not be equal. 9 Iacus, Stefano M., Gary King, and Giuseppe Porro. Multivariate Matching Methods That are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 (2011): 345-361. 3

Difference in mean base year pass rate by bandwidth Difference in mean FSM rate by bandwidth 10 5 0 5 10 6 4 2 0 2 Difference in mean number of pupils by bandwidth 50 0 50 100 Figure 2: Treatment and Control Groups Base Year Differences in Means Positive values indicate that schools above the cutoff have higher means than schools below the cutoff. The differences in means in base year covariates display clear disparities above the 35 to 50 percent bandwidths. Larger bandwidths induce bias in Clark s estimates. 50 percent: winning schools have higher pass rates and lower FSM rates, and they begin to have fewer students. Therefore schools with landslide elections - vote shares less than 25 percent or more than 75 - should not be used to estimate the treatment effect. III. Conclusion The regression discontinuity design can be extremely useful for analyzing non-random treatment as in a randomized experiment. The requirements are not particularly exigent: assignment to treatment must be determined by an assignment variable exceeding a given threshold, and subjects must not exercise precise control over the assignment variable. These two requirements are enough to produce as-good-as-randomized data around the cutoff. Assuming that these requirements hold true for school autonomy ballots, Damon Clark concludes that autonomy had a significant positive effect on those schools whose vote barely 4

passed, compared to those schools where autonomy barely failed. As in randomization, however, it is necessary to verify that the groups are in fact comparable by testing balance. The successful regression discontinuity design will select the bandwidth that produces balanced control and treatment groups, and verify that all observable variables are continuous around the cutoff. Imbalance immediately near the cutoff or a bandwidth that fails to exclude observations far from the cutoff invalidate the regression discontinuity design. Using multivariate and univariate tests of imbalance, we find multivariate imbalance to be high near the cutoff, and lowest at a bandwidth of about 10 percent, or in marginal elections with vote share between 45 percent and 55 percent. As bandwidth increases, univariate imbalance increases as one might expect: schools gaining autonomy tend to have higher test scores and lower FSM eligibility rates. Clark uses of all the data, rather than selecting a narrower bandwidth, thereby comparing imbalanced groups. He does not control for many of these observable imbalances, and they suggest other unobserved imbalances as well. These results raise further questions about the use of regression discontinuity designs in election data, and emphasize the importance of verifying the assumptions of these models. References Cellini, Stephanie Riegg et al. The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design. The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 125, Issue 19 (2010): 215-261. Clark, Damon. The Performance and Competitive Effects of School Autonomy. The Journal of Political Economy 117.4 (August 2009): 745-783. Eggers, Andrew and Jens Hainmueller. MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics. American Political Science Review 103.4 (November 2009): 513-533. Finn, Chester E., Bruno V. Manno, and Gregg Vanourek, Charter Schools in Action (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000). Grimmer, Justin et al. Are Close Elections Random? Working Paper (January 2011). Iacus, Stefano M., Gary King, and Giuseppe Porro. Multivariate Matching Methods That are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 (2011): 345-361. Lee, David S. Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics Vol. 142, Issue 2 (February 2008): 675-697. Lee, David S. and Thomas Lemieux. Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. NBER Working Paper 14723 (February 2009). 5