Hospitals could save two millions - if someone acted

Similar documents
The Reprocessing of Single- Use Medical Devices; Regulations Coming to Europe? CleanMed Europe Malmo, Sweden 26 September 2012

Workshop on the reprocessing of medical devices. 5. December Brussels. Nikou Ghassemieh Managing Director

Maximizing Sustainability Through Reprocessing Single Use Devices

Topics To Be Covered. AMDR Member Companies. What is SUD reprocessing?

2016 CADTH Symposium Dan Vukelich, Esq., CAE 11 April 2016 Ottawa

Global Pulse Oximetry Project

Reprocessing at UCSF Wins for the environment and the Medical Center

Improving your EP lab savings

on the advertising of medicinal products for human use

State of provision of Hearing Aids in Europe

Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) Explained

BRIEFING: ARGUMENTS AGAINST MINIMUM PRICING FOR ALCOHOL

21 March JCI Reuse of Single-Use Devices White Paper. Dear and :

Post-Trial Access Scenarios and Discussion Questions

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

On the use of Amalgam for dental fillings in Sweden

SAMED Position: Reuse of SUDs

THE STUDY OF HEALTH-CARE USERS: SAMPLING AND METHODOLOGY

Results of a national public opinion survey on the perception of plain packaging on tobacco one year after its implementation in the UK.

Medical Device Conservation

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE

State of Rhode Island. Medicaid Dental Review. October 2010

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL. on Directive 2011/64/EU on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco

Tariffs. YEARLY STATUS REPORT: No Progress. Import duty rates for many foods and food ingredients remain far too high.

POSSIBLE RESPONSES TO 12 COMMON ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE FCTC

Ref: E 007. PGEU Response. Consultation on measures for improving the recognition of medical prescriptions issued in another Member State

GUIDE TO REGISTER HOMEOPATHIC PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE

Health Care Technology. Press Kit. Contact: Ms. Lucijana Manovic Sales/Marketing. Tel.: +43 (0)

Virtual Mentor Ethics Journal of the American Medical Association September 2005, Volume 7, Number 9

Ex post evaluation Tanzania

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

WHO FCTC: Text, Commitments, and Timelines: Gemma Vestal, JD, MPH, MBA, BSN. Article 15: Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

POSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

Executive Summary. Overall conclusions of this report include:

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

European Sponsorship Association

THE STATE OF THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA MARKETS 2011

THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Evaluation of implementation of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in the Czech Republic

Lakshy Management Consultant Pvt. Ltd.

Consumers Association s response to the European Commission s Discussion paper on nutrition claims and functional claims

2008 EUROBAROMETER SURVEY ON TOBACCO

REFERENCE CODE GDHC317DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2013 LUCENTIS (MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS OF DIABETES) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Flash Glucose Monitoring (Flash GM) Frequently asked questions (November 2018)

REFERENCE CODE GDHC321DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2013 ATRASENTAN (MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS OF DIABETES) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. Jindřich Fialka Director of the Food Production and Legislation Department

LUNG CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS

OFFICIAL STATE BULLETIN

PUBLIC PERSPECTIVES ON PERSONALIZED MEDICINE

INTRODUCTION TO HAEMODIALYSIS

REFERENCE CODE GDHC319DFR PUBLICAT ION DATE DECEMBER 2013 EYLEA (MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS OF DIABETES) - FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Professional Development: proposals for assuring the continuing fitness to practise of osteopaths. draft Peer Discussion Review Guidelines

Congressional Record December 9, 2009 S12786-S12787

European Standard EN 15927:2010 Services offered by hearing aid professionals. Creating a barrier-free Europe for all hard of hearing citizens

This submission is lodged on behalf of Couplands Bakeries Ltd.

Will the Canadian Government s Commitment to Use a Gender-based Analysis Result in Public Policies Reflecting the Diversity of Women s Lives?

The need for a Soft Opt-out Plus approach to the proposed change in organ donor consent Ireland.

EDICT ON PROMULGATION OF THE TOBACCO LAW TOBACCO LAW

28 May 2012 Reference: ENF/S/12/017

PATIENT STUDY INFORMATION LEAFLET

HC 963 SesSIon november Department of Health. Young people s sexual health: the National Chlamydia Screening Programme

Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 13/2009 of 18 December 2008.

The Cigarette Market in Greece

Quit with Us. Service Evaluation. August 2016

Table of Contents: JULY TH EDITION

Proton Therapy Market Outlook - Global Analysis

PRE-STERILIZED SPINE IMPLANTS

Best if Clearly LAbeled. How the Consumer Packaged Goods Industry is Reducing Confusion and Food Waste

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Dagmar Roth-Behrendt Vice-President of the European Parliament

What if someone complains about me? A guide to the complaint process

New Zealand Government Oversight of Halal Certification of Animal Products Exported from New Zealand Auckland University Asia Dialogue July 2012

UPR UNIVERSAL PERIODICAL REVIEW CROATIA. Croatian Association of Deafblind Persons DODIR

Claims about health in ads for e-cigarettes. CAP and BCAP s regulatory statement

NOVEL MEDICATION FOR NEUROPATHIC PAIN

Tobacco use is Wisconsin s

Guide to Dental Benefit Plans

Changes to Australian Government Hearing Services Program and Voucher scheme

BILATERAL SCREENING MEETING

Homeopathy and Anthroposophic Medicine THEIR PLACE IN EUROPEAN HEALTH CARE

Presentation to the Standing Committee on Health on Bill C-206, an Act to Amend the Food and Drugs Act

BASF Plant Science Amflora Facts. Content

Summary Evaluation National Framework Forensic Diagnostics for Juveniles

HPV vaccination policies in Slovenia

Factsheet Energy Shots and Energy Drinks

EURORDIS contribution to the Public Consultation Recast of the Medical Devices Directives

Representing Homeopaths in Europe

The Economics of Tobacco Control and Tobacco Taxation: Challenges & Opportunities for a Tobacco Free Turkey

Social Values and Health Priority Setting Case Study

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Open Cholecystectomy at a Private Hospital in Myanmar

Cash for Kidneys: The Case for a Market for Organs

SINGLE USE MEDICAL DEVICES POLICY

Better than cure? Testing the case for enhancing prevention of single homelessness in England. Executive Summary

5,000. Number of cigarettes 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000

GATS Highlights. GATS Objectives. GATS Methodology

39th SESSION OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Transcription:

Hospitals could save two millions - if someone acted How to achieve that goal? By reprocessing of some of the expensive medical single-use devices, which for example - safe for the patients has already been done many years in US and Germany In some countries savings are generated in health care also in this way, by cleaning, testing, sterilizing, and ensuring traceability of a small number of expensive medical devices for single use; these devices can be then safely used again for another patient. Why this is not happening in our country yet, where health care is in the red figures and patients waiting list is getting longer every day? Tone Lovšin, Trokar company: The longer the state of reprocessing remains vague in the EU as well as in our country, the longer Europe market will remain an Eldorado for manufacturers

As it turned out, none of the persons we interviewed is actually against well regulated reprocessing of certain medical devices, on the contrary, they support the idea, but nobody is willing to take the first necessary step. It is not forbidden, but Do we just wait for the legislation at EU level, which has already been negotiated for some years now, and the negotiations will probably continue for another few years, even if the state could regulate this field by itself? The Ministry of Health has now promised to act. Legislation in Slovenia does not mention the reprocessing of single use medical device. So it does not prohibit it explicitly, but however, it is not explicitly allowed, nor regulated. And until it is not regulated, all Slovenian hospitals decide agains it, and potential savings are lost. Lost millions "The annual savings in the Slovenian health care could amount to approximately two million euros," estimates Tone Lovšin from the Trocar Company, who is in Slovenia representing Vanguard AG, a German company for the reprocessing of medical devices. By his estimation,

the Slovenian market for single use devices is worth around 130 million euros per year; about two to three per cent of these instruments are actually suitable for the reprocessing and reuse. In Slovenia it would amount to approximately four million euros per year. Reprocessing can bring savings for about 40 percent of the new devices. Let us say that two million euros in Slovenia could, for example, used for over 100 operations on open heart (Health Insurance is paying to hospitals for one surgery up to 23 thousand euros, and less for less demanding surgeries). For two million EUR many patients could also benefit through a 350 hip endoprosthesis (at an average price of around 5,500 euros), or 1,700 operations of varicose veins could be performed. So this is by no means negligible a saving. Mrs. Kolar inclined to change The Ministry of Health, which is now led by Mrs. Milojka Kolar Celarc, said that they had in the previous month meeting with representatives of the clinical profession and the company which is reprocessing medical devices. The clinical specialists advocate the opinion that reprocessing should be introduced in Slovenia. The ministry listened to the proposal, and promised "to prepare a proposal amendment to the regulations governing the area of medical devices in Slovenia". The precise date was not given. They intend to first inspect in detail the rules of at least three countries that have a high level of health care and have already established scope reprocessing, or their hospitals are already using such devices, and have at least one-year experience. The Ministry stressed that equal safety for the patients should be ensured after reprocessing. Advantage is seen in reducing costs for medical devices. Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Medicines and Medical Devices (ARSZMP) has no opinion Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Medicines and Medical Devices (ARSZMP) has formed no opinion, or is unable to give an opinion about reprocessing. They say they only took care of the regulations on medical devices, and reprocessing is not regulated at this moment. Otherwise new European legislation and regulation is "expected to be adopted in the second half of 2015". This should ensure the smooth functioning of the market, i.e. the establishment of uniform rules and work in practice for all Member States. The legislation will also regulate the area of reprocessing of medical devices for single use, said the representatives of the ARSZMP.

The UKC Ljubljana is in favour, but not without opinion The University Clinic Ljubljana paid in the first nine months of this year for expensive single use medical devices 922 thousand EUR. They said that they dealt discussed the issue of reprocessing extensively, just as the National Commission for the Control of infections. "We believe that properly implemented reprocessing may be a way to ensure the safe treatment of patients, at lower costs claim the representatives of the UKC Ljubljana. These could be reduced by half. They have already tried to obtain the opinion of the ARSZMP and the Ministry of Health.The Council of Experts and UKC Ljubljana executives believe that prior to the introduction of reprocessing the opinion of ARSZMP must be obtained. The representatives of the UKC Ljubljana say that the "professional public in general is in favor of this measure". However, safety for the reprocessed instruments should be ensured, both in terms of sterility and technical characteristics, the contractor reprocessing company must ensure conformity of the device with the standards, and give the same warranty as for a new product, including traceability. Reprocessing company must have evidence that the process has been certified, the selection of the devices must be in accordance with professional recommendations, and reprocessing must also be economically viable. EU (and Slovenia) is now the manufacturers Eldorado "If the reprocessing would be allowed and regulated in Slovenia, it would bring savings to the hospitals, with no disadvantages for patients. Environmental burden caused by medical waste would decrease, and the benefits would be gained by reduced consumption of new expensive and scarce rare metals. As a specialist for reprocessing I argue that this is a win-win situation for all participants. Except perhaps for manufacturers of expensive single use medical devices and their vendors in Slovenia. The longer the state of reprocessing remains vague in the EU as well as in our country, the longer Europe market will remain an Eldorado for manufacturers stresses Tone Lovšin from the company Trokar. Half a billion market in the US, the EU forced Germany In the US, reprocessing of medical devices was regulated in 2000, when the local FDA prescribed exact requirements which must be met by reprocessor, and has also demanded that an instrument for single use should maintain, after reprocessing, the same clinical and functional quality as at its first use.

According to the Association of Medical Device Reprocessors (AMDR), the US reprocessing market is today worth close to half a billion dollars, and is growing due to savings trends in health care. The market is dominated by two companies Stryker and Johnson & Johnson (who several years ago bought reprocessing company Sterilmed). At the EU level, reprocessing has not been regulated yet, it is left to individual countries. At one extreme pole is France with the explicit ban on reprocessing, the situation in Germany is quite opposite: in Germany this area was carefully arranged in 2002. The German company Vanguard AG is the EU leader in reprocessing of medical devices. They have developed special machines for cleaning, and give guarantee that the reprocessed instrument is such as a new, high-quality and safe for patients and the hospital. Vanguard AG has hitherto successfully reprocessed over four million single-use instruments. It has a German certificate for reprocessing of 3,700 medical devices. And how reprocessing is carried out in practice? Hospitals are collecting specific used single use medical devices with original packaging. The logistic company delivers them to Vanguard in Berlin. There the instruments are individually identified, traceability ensured, including the name of the owner, and all the steps taken in reference to the instrument. The medical device is then cleaned, tested and inspected, sterilized, packed, and for all the necessary steps the processes are standardized and validated. Hospital gets back their own instrument, ready for safe reuse. The most expensive medical devices (from 500 to several thousand euros per piece) suitable for reprocessing are used in surgery, cardiology, and ophthalmology - for example electrophysiological, ablation and other catheters, staplers, coagulating shears, guide wires, laparoscopic instruments, laser probes... Among the manufacturers of these medical devices global manufacturers can be found, as Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, Alcis, Covidien, Medtronic, Alcon... The University Clinical Center in Ljubljana this year spent 922,000 EUR for expensive single use medical devices in nine months only. They could save a half of the sum. 1000 EUR and more costs radiofrequency ablation catheter, which is used only once and then discarded. (It is used for management of hearth rhythm disorder).this device is suitable for reprocessing. The savings in the amount of two millions of EUR would allow:

100 open heart surgery operations Or 1,.700 operations of varicose veins Or 350 hip replacements