Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 2.2.6

Similar documents
Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 3.2.7

Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator

Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator

Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 3.2.1

Calaveras County TRL Evaluation Reporting Plan

TOBACCO CONTROL RESOURCE PROGRAM

Assessing the Political Environment Guide

Public Opinion Survey on Tobacco Use in Outdoor Dining Areas Survey Specifications and Training Guide

TUPAC Five-Year Action Plan

An Ordinance amending Subsections A and B of Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit smoking in outdoor dining areas.

Getting Started Ordinance Development Planning Form

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Reducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Smoke- Free Policies

Frequently Asked Questions about the Dee Johnson Clean Indoor Air Act

Smoke-Free Outdoor Dining Project

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CODE CHAPTER 12-5 RELATING TO SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES, CREATING OFFENSES, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES.

Highlights. Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Weight and Tobacco. A scientific random sample telephone survey of 956 citizens in. Athens-Clarke County

A Survey of Public Opinion on Secondhand Smoke Related Issues in Bourbon County, KY

Tobacco by the Numbers Game

After the FDA Tobacco Control Law: Which Policies Are Legal To Pursue?

Get Plugged In: Taking Tobacco Retailer Licensing to the Next Level. Meliah Schultzman, JD

MENDOCINO COUNTY SMOKE FREE CASINOS. Final Evaluation Report CTCP Contract Number: Contract Period: 7/1/07 6/30/10

GEORGIA SMOKEFREE AIR ACT of 2005

Request for Approval of proposed County of Alameda smoking ordinance amendments

Youth as Agents of Change

Frequently Asked Questions about the Dee Johnson Clean Indoor Air Act

ORDINANCEN3. An ordinance amending Chapter 41, Smoking, of the Dallas City Code by amending Sections

Council Agenda Report

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

Flavored Tobacco and Menthol Cigarettes Campaign LIZ HENDRIX, MPP ALLISON HARGREAVES, MPH MAY 24, 2018

4/10/2016. Considerations for the Regulation of E-Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products by Boards of Health

The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke

Reducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Smoke-Free Policies

A Policy Regulating Smoking in Multi-Unit Housing

Sacramento City College Smoke/Tobacco/Vape (STV) Free Environmental Standard

Prepared for Otter Tail County Public Health in Minnesota

Protecting Sonoma Kids Policy Campaign to Pass a Tobacco Retailer License with Flavor Restrictions in Sonoma City

Tobacco Control Policy 101. Understanding the Legislative Process

Alaskan Opinions Regarding Statewide Smoke-Free Workplace Law

Policy: Tobacco-Free Campus

Sault Tribe Smoke-free Housing Initiative Creating Healthy Places for Generations to Come

Bureau of Tobacco Free Florida County Data Profile: Jefferson June 2013

Information previously distributed / Information distribué auparavant

City of San Leandro Page 1

Lyndon Youth Baseball & Softball (LYBS)

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

Americans for Nonsmokers Rights

Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

ORDINANCE 4960 RESTRICTIONS ON SMOKING AND USE OF E-CIGARETTES, VAPING

Non-Smoker Protection Act

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS POLICY AND MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM

Montgomery County Code

Sample Smoke-Free Housing Language for Landlords

REPORT ON GLOBAL YOUTH TOBACCO SURVEY SWAZILAND

Maryland Smoke-Free Living Initiatives Maryland Health Housing Symposium June 1, 2016

HOPKINSVILLE, KENTUCKY OFFICE OF THE MAYOR. December 14, 2012

BUSINESS CASE FOR A SMOKE-FREE OUTDOOR BY-LAW

Sample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 4.1.1

Smoke-free Illinois. Illinois Department of Public Health Office of Health Promotion November 27, 2007

Oregon Statewide Tobacco Control Plan. Taking Action for a Tobacco Free Oregon. Year 4/5 Operations Plan

The 2014 Florida Statutes Title XXIX Public Health Chapter Particular Conditions Affecting Public Health Part II - Indoor Air: Tobacco Smoke

Evaluation of the Smoke-Free Ontario Act Outdoor Smoking Regulations. Jolene Dubray Tracey Borland Michael Chaiton Robert Schwartz

Tobacco Prevention. Go tobacco-free: A guide for helping your employees limit tobacco use

PROPOSED ORDINANCE 4960 RESTRICTIONS ON SMOKING AND USE OF E-CIGARETTES, VAPING

S 2228 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======== LC003527/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

RADM Patrick O Carroll, MD, MPH Senior Advisor, Assistant Secretary for Health, US DHSS

Stone Soup: A Recipe for a Healthy Community Controlling Tobacco in New Jersey. June 14, 2011

SECOND READING OF REVISED BOARD POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION (TOBACCO) Educational Services March 10, 2015 Consent #5 Page 1 of 1

The DECIDE evidence to recommendation framework applied to a potential extension of the Tobacco Act in Sweden

HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY BYLAW NUMBER S-203 RESPECTING SMOKE FREE PLACES

Evaluating Interventions to Curb ENDS Use Among Utah Youth

Ontario s New Tobacco Control Measures: Accomplishments, Snares and Snags

*X236/12/02* X236/12/02. MODERN STUDIES HIGHER Paper 2 NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AM PM

Ordinance of the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska Serial No (am)

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF GREENSTONE BY-LAW NO

Global Adult Tobacco Survey TURKEY. Dr. Peyman ALTAN MoH Tobacco Control Dep. Ankara November 2018

Colleges For Change Mobilizing the College Community to Take Action Against Big Tobacco

Lompoc City Council Agenda Item

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

COMMON QUESTIONS FOR TENANTS

Expanded Protections Dining areas No smoking where food is served in outdoor dining areas of restaurants, cafes and coffee shops as of November 2010

SMOKE AND VAPE FREE CAMPUS POLICY

MacKenzie Phillips, MPH Program Coordinator

Creating a Smoke-Free Campus: Lessons Learned at UB. NY State College Health Association 2010 Annual Meeting Workshop on October 21, :15am

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 38 OF THE CODE OF PRINEVILLE BY ADDING REGULATIONS REGARDING ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICES

HUD Smoke-Free Initiative

Contra Costa County Tobacco Prevention Coalition. A Tool for Reducing Youth Access To Tobacco: The Tobacco Retailer License

B. To protect, in particular, the health of vulnerable populations including children and those with chronic health conditions; and

Warren County Housing Authority No Smoking Policy

Prevention and Public Health Fund: Community Transformation Grants

Tell Your Story Guidelines for Preparing Useful Evaluation Reports

Institute for Health Promotion Research San Antonio Tobacco Prevention and Control Coalition Community-Based Needs Assessment-2008 Executive Summary

SMOKEFREE OUTDOOR PUBLIC PLACES POLICY

Boston Public Health Commission Regulation Clean Air Works Workplace Smoking and E-Cigarette Use Restrictions. (As Amended on December 17, 2015)

ORDINANCE NO

Defra Consultation on Street Litter Control Notices

North Carolina Prevention Report Card 2005

PREVENTION. Category: Initiation of Tobacco Use. Strategies to Reduce tobacco use initiation. used smokeless tobacco on one or more of the

MINA BENTE OCHO NA LIHESLATURAN GUAHAN 2005 (FIRST) Regular Session

Transcription:

Sample Evaluation Plan Indicator 2.2.6 Proportion of outdoor restaurant and bar businesses with a voluntary policy that designates outdoor dining and bar areas as smoke-free, including use of cigarettes, cigars, and hookahs -or- Proportion of communities with a policy that designates outdoor dining and bar areas as smoke-free, including use of cigarettes, cigars, and hookahs Objective: By June 30, 2010, 3 cities (Tallsville, Grandeville, and Ventiville) in Caffeine County will adopt a policy that prohibits smoking in outdoor dining, bar and patio areas, including use of cigarettes, cigars, and hookahs. Plan Type: Single Policy - Policy Adoption Only Study Design: Non-experimental 1

Objective Activity - Objective Overview 2

Process Data Activity - Data Collection Training 3

Process Data Activity - Public Opinion Poll (including Public Intercept Survey) 4

Process Data Activity - Key Informant Interview 5

Process Data Activity - Key Informant Interview 6

Process Data Activity - Policy Record 7

Process Data Activity - Media Activity Record 8

Evaluation Reporting 9

Evaluation Narrative Summary: The tobacco control program in Caffeine County has enjoyed much success in getting various secondhand smoke policies adopted. In addition, many restaurants have adopted voluntary policies to prohibit smoking in their outdoor dining areas. Our CX needs assessment also indicates that not only is there a need for a legislated citywide policy to prohibit smoking in outdoor dining spaces and bar and patio areas, but that the community is ready for such a policy. The overall CX rating for this indicator was 3.0. The primary purpose of this evaluation is to document determine the public s support for or against a policy prohibiting smoking in outdoor dining spaces and bar and patio areas, and the passage of the policy. Process data collection activities include a public intercept survey, data collection training, key informant interviews, a review of policy records, and an assessment of media coverage in the county. A public intercept survey of approximately 300 restaurant customers as they are entering and leaving will be conducted to asses the public s support for or against a policy prohibiting smoking in outdoor dining spaces and bar and patio areas. Other questions will include their knowledge and attitudes towards secondhand smoke and whether a restaurant s outdoor dining policy influenced their choice to dine there. Data will be tabulated and summarized to help guide our intervention strategy as well as give us something to present at city council meetings to demonstrate the public s support. Key informant interviews will be conducted with approximately 20 restaurant owners (those with and without a voluntary policy) to assess the barriers and challenges they have faced or foresee having with adoption of an outdoor dining policy. Another type of key informant interview will also be conducted with city council members in each city (4-6 for each city) to also document the barriers and challenges they see with adopting this policy. In addition, questions will also be asked about the city council s decision making process to help us plan our interventions more appropriately. Data collection training will be conducted for both the public intercept survey. A separate training will be conducted for each type of data collection type. Data collectors for the public intercept survey will be recruited from interested community groups and a help wanted ad placed in each city s local newspaper. Key informant interviewers will be conducted by the project coordinator and the contracted local program evaluator. Both trainings will be led by the contracted evaluator and will have trainees go through a simulated interview process. After success or failure of policy adoption, a post key informant interview will be conducted with both groups (restaurant owners and city council members) to document the barriers and challenges and/or successes of the process. Policy records will be reviewed prior to intervention activities to accurately assess the acceptance of city council members toward secondhand smoke policies, in general, in each city. Data will be collected on the number of press releases and media coverage that occurred during and after our campaign to determine the type and extent of media coverage. This information can be used to assess the effectiveness of project activities focused on generating interest in the policy in the community and media outlets. Our successes and lessons learned will be written up in a final evaluation report and posted to PARTNERS. Information will also be shared with the Project Directors Association (PDA) to help other counties who may want to tackle a similar objective. 10