Final Weights and Finishing Holstein Steers. Dan Schaefer Professor and Chair Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison

Similar documents
Evaluation of Wet Distillers Grains for Finishing Cattle

Low Input Small Scale Feeding. John Dhuyvetter NCREC Feb 07

EFFECTS OF ENERGY INTAKE LEVEL DURING THE GROWING PHASE ON FEEDLOT STEER PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS COMPOSITION

Evaluation of Condition Scoring of Feeder Calves as a Tool for Management and Nutrition

NEED FOR RUMINALLY DEGRADED NITROGEN BY FINISHING CATTLE FED PROCESSED GRAINS Mike Brown West Texas A&M University Canyon, TX

THE EFFECT OF OPTAFLEXX ON GROWTH, PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS TRAITS OF CALF-FED HOLSTEIN STEERS FED TO HARVEST A SUMMARY OF FOUR POST-APPROVED STUDIES

Management of Optaflexx in Feedlots that Sort Cattle Prior to Market

Exercise 6 Ration Formulation II Balance for Three or More Nutrients 20 Points

Animal Industry Report

Nutrition and Feeding For Show Calves

Effects of Roughage Level and Fibrozyme TM Supplementation on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Beef Steers

Quality and Composition of Beef from Cattle Fed Combinations of Steam-flaked Corn, Dry-rolled Corn, and Distiller's Grains with Solubles

Impact of Body Weight Gain During Stocker/Backgrounding on Feedyard Performance and Carcass Traits Galen E Erickson University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Potential of Chemically Treated Corn Stover and Modified Distiller Grains as a Partial Replacement for Corn Grain in Feedlot Diets

Evaluating the Effects of Diet Energy Density on Hereford Steer Performance with Differing Genetic Potential for Dry Matter Intake

Proceedings of the U.S. Sheep Research and Outreach Programs American Sheep Industry Association Convention

Reproductive efficiency Environment 120 Low P ( ) High P ( ) ays

Effect of Glycerol Level in Feedlot Finishing Diets on Animal Performance V.L. Anderson and B.R. Ilse NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

Animal Industry Report

POTATO CO-PRODUCT IN DIETS FOR GROWING

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

DAIRY BEEF MANAGEMENT Dairy Beef Implant Strategies: The Benefit of TBA- Containing Implants for Holstein Steers

Precision Feeding. Mike Hutjens Professor Emeritus Department of Animal Sciences University of Illinois

Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 1

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

EFFECTS OF LEVEL OF ALFALFA HAY IN STEAM-FLAKED CORN BASED DIETS CONTAINING 25% SORGHUM WET DISTILLER S GRAINS. Summary.

Beef Cattle Handbook

Forage Testing and Supplementation

Animal Industry Report

AS-1178, September 1999

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE HYBRID VARIETY ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph

Feedlot Performance of Cattle Program Fed Supplemental Protein

Does removing nutrient components from distillers grains affect the feeding value for beef cattle

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

Estimating Energy Values of Feedstuffs Approaches & Problems. Galen E Erickson

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle. E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett. Take Home Message

Procedures in Feed Formulation

Results of UW Madison Corn Shredlage Feeding Trial

Keeping Control of Feed Costs in an Uncertain Market

Effects of Varying Rates of Tallgrass Prairie Hay and Wet Corn Gluten Feed on Productivity of Dairy Cows

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine, Dairy, and Beef. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

IMPLANT EFFECTS ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND MEAT QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY DIET

High Plains Biofuels Co-product Nutrition Conference. What Have We Learned?

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

Dried Distillers Grains and(or) Soybean Hulls to Background Beef Calves Fed Bahiagrass Forage

Limit Feeding a Single Step-up Diet as an Option to Optimize Operational Labor and Cattle Efficiency

The Effect of MIN-AD on Performance and Health in Early Lactation Dairy Cows

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF DISTILLER GRAIN FOR DAIRY-BEEF PRODUCTION

The effects of corn silage feeding level on steer growth performance, feed intake and carcass composition.

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

High Plains Biofuels Co-Product Nutrition Conference. February 20, Garden City, KS.

Navigating the dairy feed situation

Lamb Feedlot Nutrition

Silage to Beef Application Updates and Equations Explained

TDN. in vitro NDFD 48h, % of NDF WEX

High Sulfur Content in Distillers Grains with Solubles May Be Deleterious to Beef Steer Performance and Carcass Quality

CHANGES IN RUMINAL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS IN TRANSITION DAIRY COWS

Can We Allow a Calf to Have a Bad Day? Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

VitaFerm + Creep Feed = Easy Transition and Efficient Gain

NUTRITIONAL MANAGEMENT OF GROW-FINISH PIGS: ENERGY

Why Does the Dollar Value of Alfalfa Hay Not Continue to increase as its TDN Increases?

Denise Beaulieu, PhD and John Patience, PhD

The Effects of Feed Budgeting, Complete Diet Blending, and Corn Supplement Blending on Finishing Pig Growth Performance in a Commercial Environment 1

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

Feeding finishing pigs K-STATE. Common mistakes in grow-finish nutrition programs. Steps in Diet Formulation. RESEARCH and EXTENSION

U S C on, hns Jo a elin C

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Using Real-Time Ultrasound During the Feeding Period to Predict Cattle Composition.

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Effects of a Novel Protease Enzyme (CIBENZA DP100) on Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics 1

Recent Applications of Liquid Supplements in Dairy Rations

Optimum production or income over feed cost during the subsequent lactation occurs with 50- to 70-day dry periods.

Effects of Processing Field Peas on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Feedlot Heifers

Effects of Feeding Varied Levels of Balanced Protein on Growth Performance and Carcass Composition of Growing and Finishing Pigs 1,2

Effects of Ractopamine and Carnitine in Diets Containing 5% Fat for Finishing Pigs

TRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT. J.E. Shirley

PROPOSED BEEF CATTLE MANURE EXCRETION AND CHARACTERISTICS STANDARD FOR ASAE

Effect of FuzZpellet on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle

Winter Feeding Programs for Beef Cows and Calves

RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER

Effect of Vitamin C on Performance and Antioxidant Capacity of Cattle Fed Varying Concentrations of Dietary Sulfur

Feeding Animals for Profit - Will my 2017 hay cut it?

Ethanol Co-products Beef Quality Implications

Frame Size and Market-Ready Weights

Feed Particle Separation Due to Feed Delivery and Time in Feed Bunk and Effects on Cattle Performance

MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND FEED ADDITIVES CAN THEY ELIMINATE FESCUE TOXICITY?

Production Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion

Corn DDGS: A Feed Industry Perspective

Growing Calf and Show Steer Feed Management 1

Effect of KemTRACE Chromium on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Merit 1

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?

ALFALFA LEAF MEAL IN BEEF STEER RECEIVING DIETS

Optimizing Income over Feed Supplement Costs

Forage analysis. Using it to design a supplementation program Tri-State Beef Conference

Effect of Increasing Levels of Monensin in an Energy Supplement for Cattle Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

Feeding and Managing a Herd for 100 Pounds of Milk/Day - Thinking Outside the Normal Paradigm

INCREASING PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE AFTER WEANING USING COTTONSEED AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTS

Transcription:

Final Weights and Finishing Holstein Steers Dan Schaefer Professor and Chair Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison

Outline The goals Final weight and carcass weight Cost per unit of energy Anabolic implants and beta agonists UWEX Wis Beef Information Center

Goals Optimal fit to carcass grid pricing Cost of gain is less than value of gain Optimal use of farm resources

An Example Finished Holstein Steer Carcass Price Grid JBS Packerland, Green Bay, WI March 18, 2016 Base USDA Quality and Yield Grade: Ch & YG3 Base ( par ) weight: 750 1,000 lbs Ch & YG3: $2.06/lb carc Prime: +$0.08 Over 30 mo: $0.35 Select: $0.09 Dark cutter: $0.35 Standard: $0.35 1001 1050 lbs: $0.10 YG1&2: +$0.00 1051 1100 lbs: $0.15 Stag: $0.35

The Holstein cow is big! Milk production and cow size have increased over the past 20 years 25,000 Annual milk production, lbs 22,500 20,000 17,500 y = 313x - 607 R² = 0.99 Guideline: Steers will finish at approx. the weight of mature cows 15,000 1998 U of MN 2016 UW-Madison 12,500 Crookston Cow Lines: Mature Cows: ~1600 lbs Small 1340 lbs 10,000 Large 1500 lbs 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Milk production - USDA statistics; MN Cow size - Hansen et al., JDS 1999; UW cow size - personal communication 2016

Holstein steer return per day at the end of the finishing period ADG, lbs DMI, lbs Per Day Feed Cost ($0.08/lb DM) Total Cost 1 Value ($1.15/ lb LW) Net Return 2.75 25.0 $2.00 $2.70 $3.16 $0.46 2.50 25.0 $2.00 $2.70 $2.87 $0.18 2.25 25.0 $2.00 $2.70 $2.59 $(0.11) 1 Yardage assumed to be $0.50/d, and interest cost $0.20/d

When does Holstein growth rate diminish? 3.75 3.50 3.25 TX Trial "A" WI Trial "B" ADG, lbs 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 All steers consumed ~21 to 25 lbs DM 2.00 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Holstein steer weight, lbs TX = Walter et al., 2014 PNC; WI = Schaefer et al., 2014 unpublished; Trials A and B = Brown et al., 2014 JAS or Vogel et al., 2009 PAS.

Holstein steer return per day at the end of the finishing period ADG, lbs DMI, lbs Per Day Feed Cost ($0.08/lb DM) Total Cost 1 Value ($1.15/ lb LW) Net Return 2.75 25.0 $2.00 $2.70 $3.16 $0.46 2.50 25.0 $2.00 $2.70 $2.87 $0.18 2.25 25.0 $2.00 $2.70 $2.59 $(0.11) 1 Yardage assumed to be $0.50/d, and interest cost $0.20/d So It s profitable to feed Holsteins heavier

Implication for Carcass Weight At which shrunk weight does the carcass weight discount take effect? Dressing Percentage 59% 60% 61% Carcass wt, lb 1000 1000 1000 Shrunk live wt, lb 1695 1667 1639 Full live wt, lb 1758 1728 1700 Shrunk weight was calculated as 96.3% of full weight. Therefore, 3.7% shrink factor.

But if a pen of cattle is sold, variation exists Percentage of Pen 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 65 lb HCW STDEV Avg. Carcass = 914 Dress = 61% 1500 lb Shrunk, 1550 lb Full HCW = 1,000 lb Dress = 61% 1639 lb SW 1700 lb FW 0% 725 775 825 875 925 975 1025 1075 1125 (1270) (1500) (1760) Hot Carcass Wt, lb

Economic effect of feeding a pen of Holstein steers to heavier finish weights Carcass, lb 854 885 915 946 Shrunk, lb 1400 1450 1500 1550 Full, lb 1452 1504 1556 1607 Carc, $/lb $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $ 2.06 $/hd gross $ 1,759 $ 1,822 $ 1,885 $ 1,948 >1000 lb, % 1 3.6 8.8 17.8 >1050 lb, % 0 0.5 1.8 5.6 $/hd deducts $ 1.0 $ 4.4 $ 11.6 $ 26.6 Added DOF 0 17 34 51 Added inputs $ - $ 45.9 $ 91.8 $ 137.7 Adj Gross, $/hd $ 1,758 $ 1,772 $ 1,781 $ 1,783 1 Assumed dress = 61% 2 Shrink = 3.7% 3 Assumed HCW standard deviation to be 65 lbs 4 Discount for > 1,000 HCW = $0.10/lb, Discount for > 1,050 HCW = $0.15/lb 5 Assumed cost of each additional day on feed = $2.70

Maximum Finishing Weights Percentage of Pen 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% Large groups: 1450-1500 lb HCW = 1,000 Dress = 61% 1640 lb SW 0.0% 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 Shrunk weight (SW) Small, highly sorted groups: 1550-1600 lb

Market Signal JBS Packerland: Finished Holstein steers have gotten too heavy. We prefer 1375 1425 lb calf fed steers and will reflect this in our pricing. If they are greater than 1600 lb, we will walk away.

Summary Mature weight of Holstein steers has and will continue to increase Challenge is to finish these steers before they incur carcass weight discounts or market discrimination

Nutrition of Growing & Finishing Cattle growing/finishing traditional reference to a two-phase feeding program; growing phase emphasizes growth of skeleton and muscle finishing phase emphasizes diet with higher energy concentration for fattening

Reasons for Holstein steers becoming too heavy Too much growing diet before finishing diet begins Get them transitioned to finishing diet by 850 lb Finishing diet does not have sufficient energy concentration to satisfy muscle growth potential as well as support fat deposition Too much corn silage and not enough grain

Nutrients of Interest for Diet Formulation Energy (NE gain ) Protein Calcium Phosphorus Potassium Vitamin A Salt, trace mineralized

Nutrients of Interest for Diet Formulation Energy (NE gain ) Protein Calcium Phosphorus Potassium Vitamin A Salt, trace mineralized Energy accounts for largest component of required nutrients

Nutrients of Interest - Energy Goal Maximize ADG and feed conversion efficiency feed energy-dense diets maximize dry matter intake, therefore palatability and bunk management are important Energy feeds of lowest cost are desired

Energy Concentrations in Grains and Forages Feed NEgain (Mcal/cwt DM) Ratio to Corn Corn, whole, 15% moisture 65 100 Corn, ~28% moisture 71 109 Modified wet distillers 66 102 Barley 61 94 Oats 52 80 Bakery 68 105 Corn silage 47 72 Alfalfa hay, mid-bloom, 103-124 RFQ BEEF Magazine, 2016 26 40

Cost per Mcal of Dry Corn NEg Bushel of dry corn = 56 lbs @15% H 2 0 56 lbs * 0.85 lb DM/lb as-fed = 47.6 lb DM Dry corn: 0.65 Mcal NEg/lb DM 47.6 lb DM * 0.65 Mcal NEg/lb DM = 30.94 Mcal NEg Corn price = $3.40/ bushel $3.40/ 30.94 Mcal = $0.11/Mcal NEg

Cost per Unit of Net Energy for Gain Feed Unit DM,% $/unit $/Mcal NEg Corn, dry Bu 85 3.40 0.110 Corn, HM Bu 3.40 0.101 Corn silage Ton 35 34 0.103 Alfalfa hay Ton 88 74 0.162 Corn silage calories are less expensive than alfalfa hay calories. Corn silage is a cost effective forage source in the diet, but its NEg concentration is too low to be the main NEg source

Cost per Unit of Net Energy for Gain Feed Unit DM,% $/unit $/Mcal NEg Corn, dry Bu 85 3.40 0.110 Wheat Bu 87 4.00 0.118 Modif. wet DG Ton 45 50 0.088 Corn gluten feed pellets Ton 90 100 0.099 Wheat midds Ton 90 85 0.094 Sweet corn silage Ton 23 10 0.051 http://agebb.missouri.edu/dairy/byprod/allproducts.asp

DMI and Nutrient Requirements at 845 lbs 5 Amount (DMI) or Concentration 4 3 2 1 DMI*0.1, lb/d ADG, lb/d CP*0.1, % Ca, % P, % 0 0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8 NEgain, Mcal/cwt diet DMI and nutrient reqts based on beef steer that would attain USDA Choice at 1300 lbs As NEgain concentration in diet increases ADG increases CP, Ca and P requirements increase modestly

Corn silage dilutes the NEg concentration DM formula NEg/lb NEg Supplement 5 0.25 1.25 Corn silage 40 0.47 18.8 MWDG 20 0.63 12.6 Corn 35 0.65 22.75 Total 100 55.4 NEg/cwt DM Formula, Diet NEg, % Corn Silage Mcal/cwt 10 60.8 15 59.9 25 58.1 40 55.4

DMI and Nutrient Requirements at 845 lbs 5 Amount (DMI) or Concentration 4 3 2 1 0 0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.8 DMI*0.1, lb/d ADG, lb/d CP*0.1, % Ca, % P, % NEgain, Mcal/cwt diet DMI and nutrient reqts based on beef steer that would attain USDA Choice at 1300 lbs As NEgain concentration in diet increases from 0.55 to 0.60 Mcal/lb diet, ADG increases from 3.5 to 4.0 lb/day!

Summary Mature weight of Holstein steers has and will continue to increase Challenge is to finish these steers before they incur carcass weight discounts or market discrimination Less corn silage means faster weight gain 15% corn silage in DM formula is safe steers will deposit some fat

Anabolic Implant Products Ingredients Brand Potency Cost/dose EB+P Synovex-C Weak $1.21 EB+P Synovex-S Intermed $1.21 EB+TBA Synovex- Plus Strong $3.63 Estradiol Compudose Weak $2.55 Estradiol Encore Weak $2.86 Zeranol Ralgro Weak $1.41 EB+TBA Revalor S Intermed $3.51 EB+TBA Revalor XS Intermed $8.63 EB=estradiol benzoate; P=progesterone; TBA=trenbolone acetate, updated 3/14/16

Common Implant Usage and Potency Steer Calf Initial (140-200 d pre-kill) Terminal (70-120 d pre-kill) Ralgro W Synovex S or H I Synovex S or H I Synovex C W Synovex Choice I Revalor S or H I Revalor G M Revalor S or H I Revalor IS or IH I Revalor IS or IH I Synovex Plus S Revalor 200 S Encore (350 days) Compudose (175 days) Revalor XS (Rev-IS then Rev-S, 200 days) W W I Potency: W = weak, M = mild, I = intermediate, S= strong

Holstein steer performance and economic returns when administered various implant regimens and fed for 244 days Implant Regimen 1 SEM Control Encore E/S/S Initial BW 2, lbs 772 776 773 28 Final BW 2, lbs 1416 a 1555 b 1607 b 19 ADG, lbs 2.64 a 3.19 b 3.42 b 0.12 pdmi, lbs 22.8 24.1 24.6 - F:G 8.6 7.5 7.2 - HCW, lbs 833 c 915 b 954 a 13 USDA Prime, % 32 40 10 10 Net return over control 3, $ - $124.00 $167.00-1 Control = non-implanted, Encore = administered Encore (E) on d 0, and E/S/S = administered E on d 0, Revalor-S (S) on d 109 and 196. 2 Body weights reported were shrunk 3% of scale weight. 3 Assumptions: In value = $130/cwt, out value = $115/cwt, feed cost $0.08/lb DM, E = $3.00, S = $3.50, and each implanting occurrence was charged $2 as a chute charge. *Avg 1552# pre-fed weight, 1495# packer pre-harvest weight (3.7%)

Feeding Optaflexx 1 to Holstein Steers Item Change when fed Optaflexx Increase in final weight, lbs +17 Increase in HCW, lbs +11 Cost $16.5 Net Return SW basis ($1.25/lb) +$4.7 Net Return Carcass basis ($2.06/lb) +$6.2 1 Assumed Optaflexx was fed for 28 to 35 days at 200 mg/hd/d. Brown et al., 2014 JAS; Vogel et al., 2009 PAS; Bass et al., 2009 PAS; Elanco 2011, AI11140 bulletin.

Summary Mature weight of Holstein steers has and will continue to increase Challenge is to finish these steers before they incur carcass weight discounts or market discrimination Less corn silage means faster weight gain 15% corn silage in DM formula is safe Anabolic implant program is highly profitable Feeding Optaflexx is only slightly profitable

Feeding modern Holstein steers: Conclusions They have the ability to maintain terminal finishing phase gain > 2.5 lb/d; up to 3.4 lb/d is possible Pen gross value maximized at 1450 lb ave; heavier if careful sorting occurs Steers must be pushed with high-grain diets to overcome their genetic predisposition to finish at weights that would incur carcass weight discount Implanting still offers large net return

Wis Beef Information Center http://fyi.uwex.edu/wbic/dairybeef/

Thank you! Questions?