Evaluating Language and Communication Skills

Similar documents
Student Language and Communication Profile Summary

Allen Independent School District Bundled LOTE Curriculum Beginning 2017 School Year ASL III

I. Language and Communication Needs

Areas to Address with All Families

Summer Institute for Teachers of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students

CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS WHO ARE: DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING

TIPS FOR TEACHING A STUDENT WHO IS DEAF/HARD OF HEARING

Hearing Impaired K 12

LANGUAGE ARTS AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE I COMPONENT. Volume I - Page 173 LANGUAGE ARTS - AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE I

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Deaf-blindness

MA 1 Notes. moving the hand may be needed.

TExES American Sign Language Curriculum Crosswalk

Arts and Entertainment. Ecology. Technology. History and Deaf Culture

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

3/16/2016. Learning Objectives. Benefits of Bilingual/Bimodal Preschool Programming. Bilingual/Bimodal Inclusive Early Childhood Program

IEP Checklist: (DHH) Parent

Happy! Who Are We? 3/9/2015

TExES American Sign Language (ASL) (184) Test at a Glance

Autism Spectrum Disorders: An update on research and clinical practices for SLPs

TExES Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (181) Test at a Glance

Service Delivery Guide for Educating Students Who Are Deaf and Low Functioning

MA 1 Notes. Deaf vs deaf p. 3 MA1 F 13

Director of Testing and Disability Services Phone: (706) Fax: (706) E Mail:

Bringing Your A Game: Strategies to Support Students with Autism Communication Strategies. Ann N. Garfinkle, PhD Benjamin Chu, Doctoral Candidate

World Languages American Sign Language (ASL) Subject Matter Requirements

Listening to Learn: Strategies and Modifications for Children with Hearing Loss in the Classroom Environment

Implementing the Language Assessment Program for Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

A Structured Language Approach to Teach Language and Literacy to Hearing and Visually Impaired Pupils with Autism

SCHOOL-BASED LANGUAGE COMPETENCY CHECKLISTS THIS SECTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY EACH EDUCATIONAL PLANNING TEAM MEMBER. SECTION 2:M

CLASSROOM AMPLIFICATION: WHO CARES? AND WHY SHOULD WE? James Blair and Jeffery Larsen Utah State University ASHA, San Diego, 2011

Communication Repair & Self Advocacy Karen Anderson, PhD ASHA, November 20,

Expression of Interest. Coaching and Mentoring: Auditory-Verbal Therapy

LEARNING TO LISTEN. Auditory Potential for students with hearing differences

Question 2. The Deaf community has its own culture.

Financial Disclosure 3/22/2018

DATA Model Skills Checklist: Curriculum Crosswalk

Communication Options and Opportunities. A Factsheet for Parents of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children

An Overview of Tactile American Sign Language Michelle Radin Special Education Service Agency

F O R R T D S E R V I C E

Terminology. Education of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children ADA (PL , 1990) WHO (1980) WHO (1999) WHO (1999) SPA Lundeen!

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Autism

Cochlear Implant Education Center

SUPPORTING TERTIARY STUDENTS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENT

World Language Department - Cambridge Public Schools STAGE 1 - DESIRED RESULTS. Unit Goals Unit 1: Introduction to American Sign Language

OHIO ASSESSMENTS FOR EDUCATORS (OAE) FIELD 044: SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIALIST: DEAF/HARD OF HEARING

Family-centered early intervention for families and children who are deaf or hard of hearing

Curriculum-embedded Auditory Training for School Age Children with Hearing Loss

American Sign Language II Topic Outline Course Description and Philosophy

GACE American Sign Language Assessment Test at a Glance

EHDI in Michigan. Introduction. EHDI Goals and Communication Options. Review of EHDI Goals. Effects of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS)

Pragmatic language in fragile X syndrome, autism, and Down syndrome

Karla Giese What Is Cued Speech?

Captioning Your Video Using YouTube Online Accessibility Series

Placement Checklist for Children Who Are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

C.H.I.L.D. Children s Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties Questions for the Child to Answer:

LENA Project. Listen and Talk Early Intervention Program & Fontbonne University Deaf Education Program Collaboration 2016

Attitudes, Accommodations and Advocacy, Oh My!

What is the Role of the Hearing Specialist in Early Steps? Karen Anderson, PhD Coordinator of Early Intervention Services for Hearing and Vision

COSD UNDERGRADUATE COURSES

Bilingualism: Should I Enroll my Child in an Immersion Program?

Classroom Accommodations for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

Communications Sciences & Disorders Course Descriptions

Bilingualism: Part II. ASL/English Bilingual Education. ASHA Convention 2006 Susanne Scott

There are often questions and, sometimes, confusion when looking at services to a child who is deaf or hard of hearing. Because very young children

Interpreter Preparation (IPP) IPP 101 ASL/Non-IPP Majors. 4 Hours. Prerequisites: None. 4 hours weekly (3-1)

Meeting someone with disabilities etiquette

Coordinated Family Services Plan

Tips When Meeting A Person Who Has A Disability

Treating Cluttered Speech in a Child with Autism: Case Study

Expanded Core Curriculum for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Assessment Matrix

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT

ASL ONE CURRICULUM UNIT ONE: Lesson 1.1 Fingerspelling I Rule #1 of Deaf Culture Assessment: Assignment 1.1

Speechreading (Lipreading) Carol De Filippo Viet Nam Teacher Education Institute June 2010

Technical Report #2 Testing Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Teacher/Class: Ms. Brison - ASL II. Standards Abilities Level 2. Page 1 of 5. Week Dates: Oct

Co-Teaching. Teaching them All

to the child and the family, based on the child's and family's abilities and needs. The IFSP needs to address the communication needs of the child and

Providing Effective Communication Access

Communication Planning Guide for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

MULTI-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION

Teacher/Class: Ms. Brison - ASL II. Standards Abilities Level 2. Page 1 of 5. Week Dates: Aug 29-Sept2

COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS (CSD)

Conversation Tactics Checklist (Hallam, R S, Ashton, P, Sherbourne, K, Gailey, L, & Corney, R. 2007).

HEARING SCREENING A Parent s Guide

Optimal Filter Perception of Speech Sounds: Implications to Hearing Aid Fitting through Verbotonal Rehabilitation

Concept & Language Development in Young Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing or Visually Impaired

Advocating for the Needs of the Oral Deaf Student

Interpreter Preparation (IPP) IPP 101 ASL/Non-IPP Majors. 4 Hours. Prerequisites: None. 4 hours weekly (3-1)

Working Together: The Information Exchange Between Families, Pediatric Audiologists and Early Interventionists to Maximize Outcomes

Learning to Listen with Hearing Technologies: An interdisciplinary perspective on aural rehabilitation. Do not copy without permission of the author

Social Communication in young adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) Eniola Lahanmi

Communicate with Confidence: Introducing SoundSuccess

A Year of Tips for Communication Success

Advocacy Evolution: Educate the World! Marjorie Madsen Keilers Executive Director, Hands & Voices New Mexico Chapter Parent and HH Adult

USING CUED SPEECH WITH SPECIAL CHILDREN Pamela H. Beck, 2002

SPEECH PERCEPTION IN A 3-D WORLD

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Proposed Standards for Standard Course of Study in American Sign Language (ASL) Secondary Level

PEIMS Reporting for the Regional Day School Program for the Deaf (RDSPD)

Teacher/Class: Ms. Brison - ASL II Week Dates: March Standards Abilities Level 2. Page 1 of 5

ASL 102 American Sign Language II (4) Second in a related series of courses that focus on the use and study of ASL. This course

Transcription:

Evaluating Language and Communication Skills Statewide Conference on Education of the Deaf San Marcos, Texas July, 2016 Kelley Watt, M. Ed Region 4 Education Service Center Houston, Texas kelley.watt@esc4.net 713.744.6363 Sandra Connatser, M. Ed Connatser Consulting, Inc. Houston, Texas connatserconsulting@gmail.com 281.250.5151 The Part C Form versus The Narrative Basic Student Profile: Ruth is an eight year old student, enrolled in the third grade at Dreamfield Elementary. She has a moderately severe hearing loss and uses a combination of listening and spoken language and signs to communicate. She receives special education services through the Regional Day School Program for the Deaf (RDSPD). Part C Form (excerpt) AREA STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Speechreading Narrative (excerpt) Ruth can speechread single words, phrases and short sentences when speaker is in close proximity. She doesn t always remember to look for visual cues to enhance her understanding of a spoken message. Speechreading: The Auditory Discrimination and Lip Reading Skills Inventory (ADLR) was administered by the SLP on April 1, 2015 to determine Ruth s ability to speechread. It should be noted that the ADLR is administered with pictures in single word, short phrase and sentence levels. This assessment does not evaluate lip reading in connected speech or during classroom oral presentations. Ruth wore her bilateral hearing aids during this assessment and this assessment was administered in a quiet environment as an Auditory Discrimination task paired with lip reading. The evaluating SLP sat 3 feet in front of Ruth and looked at Ruth when speaking the test items. The evaluating SLP only presented the target words as opposed to both test items. Gestures and signs were not used for these tasks. Overall, Ruth is able to lip read successfully at least 70% of the time (single words, phrases and short sentences) spoken messages when paired with lip reading in a quiet environment when a person is seated 3 feet in front of her. She required reminders between each subtest to look at the evaluating SLP when she spoke. Speechreading is a functional skill for Ruth that she uses to acquire information that may be otherwise missed through audition alone. 1

Part C Form (excerpt) AREA STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Audition Ruth can hear spoken phrases in quiet conditions with an average of 70% accuracy. Her ability to understand the message increases to 80% accuracy when the speaker is in close proximity and visual supports are provided. Ruth struggles to hear spoken phrases in noise and at a distance. She does not have adequate auditory access when she is not wearing her hearing aids. Narrative (excerpt) Functional Listening: On February 24, 2015, the RDSPD Audiologist conducted the Functional Listening Evaluation (FLE). The purpose of this evaluation is to determine how listening abilities are affected by noise, distance, and visual input in an individual s natural listening environment. This evaluation was conducted in Ruth s deaf education classroom with other students and staff present in the room. Ruth wore both hearing aids at the time of this evaluation. A sound level meter was used to measure sound levels in the room. The occupied ambient noise level of the classroom was measured to vary between 60dB and 75dB. During close conditions, the Audiologist stood 3 feet from Ruth. During distant conditions, the Audiologist stood 12 feet from Ruth. During quiet conditions, only the occupied ambient noise was present. During noise conditions, the noise source (a laptop playing noise) was placed 3 feet from Ruth and the sound level of the noise was measured at a steady 60dB at Ruth s ear. Results were as follows. Functional Listening Scores with hearing aids: Close in Quiet Close with Noise Distant in Quiet Distant with Noise Auditory-Visual 80% 70% 70% 60% Auditory 75% 65% 55% 50% Noise results (all conditions quiet versus all conditions with noise) show that Ruth s average success repeating spoken phrases in all quiet conditions was 70% accuracy. In the same conditions with additional noise presented, she achieved 61.25% average of accuracy. Distance results (all conditions close versus all conditions at a distance) show Ruth s average success repeating spoken phrases in all close conditions was 72.5% accuracy. When the Audiologist moved from 3 feet distance to 12 feet distance from Ruth, her average across all conditions decreased to 58.75% accuracy. Visual input results (all conditions with auditory-visual provided versus auditory only) showed that when Ruth was provided auditory and visual messages (spoken and lipreading) in all conditions, she achieved an average of 70% accuracy. When she was given auditory only and the lipreading was not provided, she achieved a 61.25 %. Overall results indicate that Ruth can repeat auditory only messages with the greatest accuracy when she is in close proximity (within 3 feet) to the speaker without background noise (only classroom noise). She has the most difficulty when the message is auditory only without visual support and presented at a distance of 12 feet. Ruth s consistent use of her hearing aids across all academic settings will assist her in the functional use of her listening skills. Due to Ruth s moderately severe hearing loss, the Functional Listening Evaluation was not conducted without amplification. 2

Part C Form (excerpt) AREA STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Sign Language Expressive Oral Language Expressive Ruth uses conceptually accurate signs in English word order. She shakes and nods her head to indicate negation and confirmation when signing. She uses some classifiers to identify basic objects. She also utilizes facial expressions to express meaning. She uses noun modifiers to indicate the size of an object. Ruth uses nouns and verbs in English word order. She is able to answer questions about herself. She uses polite intonation phrases, and asks questions. Her average length utterances is 3.39. She can answer simple who and what questions. When she is tired, Ruth s signs become less precise and slightly difficult to understand. She tends to omit signs for the words that she has learned to say clearly. Ruth does not utilize body shift when telling a story with more than one character. Ruth uses few descriptors. She struggles to have longer and more detailed conversations. Her language levels are below what is developmentally appropriate for her age. She struggles to answer questions about the setting of a story or an event. Narrative (excerpt) Expressive Language and Communication: Ruth s native language is English. When communicating, she uses a combination of listening and spoken language, and Conceptually Accurate Signed English (sign language). Samples of Ruth s expressive language and communication skills were collected four times through audio/video by the deaf education teacher. Two times were during small group instruction when discussing a story read by the teacher and answering questions about the story. The third time was in her art class when asked to describe a picture, and the fourth time was in a social situation at lunch when Ruth was talking to her peers. A total of 67 utterances were recorded for the four situations, all of which contained a combination of spoken English and Conceptually Accurate Signed English. Ruth s utterances ranged in length from 1 to 6 morphemes and her average length of utterance (MLU) was 3.39. The overall number of different words she used was 191. When describing the picture, she used an average of 21 words to describe the pictures. She used 15 words that were nouns, labeling items and people in the picture but used only 2 adjectives as descriptors. She used 12 verbs which included wash, clean, throw, get, put, make, come, eat, say, bring and pull. ( Girl wash hand. and Man eat. ) During the reading activities, she was able to answer simple who and what questions 7 out of 10 times on one occasion and 8 out of 10 times on the second occasion. She was unable to answer any questions about the setting, such as where and when the story occurred. ( Play outside. ) During lunch, when visiting with her friends, Ruth tended to use 3 to 4 word utterances, often using nouns and verbs in English order but few descriptors. ( Milk open hard. ) Those same 67 utterances of Ruth s expressive language and communication were analyzed by the deaf education teacher and SLP using the Cottage Acquisition Scales for Listening Language and Speech (CASLLS). The CASLLS is a tool that lists the developmental acquisition of listening, language, speech and cognition skills. A student s performance for each skill is marked with one of the following ratings: Emerging (the behavior has been observed at least once); Mastered (the behavior is used accurately, but perhaps only in class or therapy); or Generalized (the target behavior is used easily and in a wide variety of settings; never or almost never makes an error). 3

Ruth is functioning on the Simple Sentence Level of the CASLLS which covers a developmental age range of 24-48 months. Her recorded skills are as follows. In the area of semantics, Ruth has the following skills: emerging level with answering simple riddles, sequencing 3 critical elements, and answers What s a for? ; mastered level with identifying objects by category, and understands comparative er; and generalized level with answering 3 questions about herself. In the area of syntax, Ruth has the following skills: emerging level with using present progressives, and using a few irregular past tense forms of verbs; with the sentence pattern N+V; using plurals, and using first, then. In the area of pragmatics Ruth has the following skills: emerging level with having long detailed conversations, consistently using descriptions to clarify, and using pronouns across sentences to mark object; mastered level with correcting others, using language for teasing mastered level with using past tense ed, using 3 rd person singular, and using won t; generalized level / joking, and using polite intonation patterns; and generalized level with apologizing by saying I m sorry, making requests using yes/no questions, and telling 2 events in correct order. Ruth functions below her developmental age level for expressive levels of language proficiency. The deaf education teacher also analyzed the video of utterances to determine how Ruth pairs her signs with spoken language. When using simultaneous communication, Ruth s signs correspond to approximately 98% of what she says with spoken English. Typically the signs she omits are the words she has learned to say clearly. For example, she will say Mom help me. while signing Mom help. She uses some classifiers to identify basic objects (e.g. 3 for car driving, and 1 for person). She uses head shakes and nods to indicate negation and confirmation. Ruth also incorporates facial expressions into her signed communication to convey meaning. She occasionally uses noun modifiers to indicate size of objects. Ruth does not incorporate body shifting when telling a story with more than one character. When she is tired, her signs become less precise and slightly difficult to understand. Ruth signing skills are within the early intermediate level according to the ASL Scale of Development created by the University of California. Preferred Mode of Communication Part C Form (excerpt) Based on the data presented in this report, the method of communication recommended for this student is: listening and spoken language with signs (simultaneous communication). Narrative (excerpt) Ruth uses a combination of spoken and listening language, and Conceptually Accurate Signed English (simultaneous communication) across all settings. Receptively she understands more through visual/manual information but also comprehends some auditory information. Ruth requires signed communication when learning new content or abstract concepts. Expressively when communicating with communication partners who sign, Ruth signs and speaks simultaneously. When communicating with communication partners who do not sign, Ruth primarily uses spoken language and adds gestures to support her message. 4

Essential Elements Additional handout detailing the components of each domain and area. Audiological Otological Physical Expressive Receptive Hearing Technology Articulation Intelligibility Components Competencies Functional Listening Auditory Skills Speechreading Components Competencies Supports Parent Information Preferred Mode of Communication Home Language Preference Student Specific Language Samples Tips: 1. take samples across a variety of contexts that are familiar and routine for the student 2. collect 50-100 utterances 3. record (video and audio) language samples 4. transcribe the utterances using notational conventions Implementation Ideas for how to begin: 1) Sample students current FIE or PLAAFPs. 2) Apply Essential Elements to determine what areas are consistently and thoroughly addressed. 3) Fine tune the areas that are mostly complete. 4) Determine a process for collecting information on the areas that are absent. Tips for a successful process: 1) Determine what skills need to be evaluated and who will evaluate them. 2) Use a variety of tools (informal, criterion referenced, norm referenced). 3) Collect data that is meaningful, understandable, and useful. 4) Apply the data to decision making. 5) Ensure all involved service providers collaborate. 5

Evaluating Language and Communication Skills Statewide Conference for Education of the Deaf San Marcos, Texas July 2016

Questions to Answer What are the specific language and communication skills that need to be evaluated? How can you ensure you re effectively evaluating those skills?

Ruth The Part C Form versus The Narrative Speechreading (p. 1) Audition (p. 2) Expressive Language and Communication (p. 3-4) Preferred Mode of Communication (p. 4)

Essential Elements Physical Audiological Otological Hearing Technology

Essential Elements Parent Information Home Language Preference

Essential Elements Preferred Mode of Communication Student Specific

Communication Continuum Expressive S So SO Os O Sign Language Mostly sign with oral support Equal use of sign and oral Mostly oral with sign support Oral Receptive V Va VA Av A Visual Mostly visual with auditory support Equal use of visual and auditory Mostly auditory with visual support Auditory

Essential Elements Expressive Articulation Intelligibility Components Competencies

Expressive Language and Communication S So SO Os O Sign Language Mostly sign with oral support Equal use of sign and oral Mostly oral with sign support Oral ASL Combined modes Combined modes Combined modes listening Manually Coded English home signs gestures Simultaneous Communication (Sim- Com)/ Signed Supported Speech (SSS) Simultaneous Communication (Sim- Com)/ Signed Supported Speech (SSS) Simultaneous Communication (Sim- Com)/ Signed Supported Speech (SSS) speaking vocalizations

Language Samples Tips: take samples across a variety of contexts that are familiar and routine for the student collect 50-100 utterances record (video and audio) language samples transcribe the utterances using notational conventions

Transcribing Language Samples 1. The kids are playing. THE KIDS ARE PLAYING 2. The parents are at work. PARENT WORK 3. My friend is Julia. FRIEND J-U-L-I-A (SN) 4. YESTERDAY I DRIVE HIGHWAY SEE CAR SWERVE (CL:3)

Standardized Assessments validity reliability qualitative vs. quantitative

Expressive: Articulation What is the skill? ability to form and produce speech sounds accurately in single words and in connected speech How can the skill be evaluated? standardized articulation tests informal data collection Who can evaluate the skill? Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Intelligibility What is the skill? how much of the child's spontaneous communication is understood by the listener How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples speech and signs various communication partners Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Components What is the skill? Phonology: study of the speech sound system of a language, including the rules for combining using phonemes How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples, phonological skills tests Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Components What is the skill? Morphology: study of the rules that govern how morphemes, the minimal meaningful units of language, are used in language How can the skill be evaluated? assessment of morphological skills, language samples Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Components What is the skill? Semantics: the meaning of words and combinations of words in a language. How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples developmental scales and inventories standardized tests Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Components What is the skill? Syntax: the rules that pertain to the ways in which words can be combined to form sentences in a language. How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples, formal and informal assessment Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Components What is the skill? Pragmatics - the rules assciiated with the use of language in conversation and broader social situations. How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples, rating scales Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Components Spoken Fingerspelling Signs

Signing Exact English Hello. My name is Dennis Davino. Welcome to the Cypress College Educational Interpreter Training Program. Look at the classes we are planning. Our first classes begin the week of Aug 22 nd, 2005. Hope to see you there.

Conceptually Accurate Signed English Hello, My name Dennis Davino Welcome Cypress College educate interpret train program Look class class we are plan plan Our class start week Aug 22 nd, 2005 Hope see there

American Sign Language Hello. Name me what? Dennis last name Davino. want inform program what? interpreter train For for? interpret work where? school all program where? Cypress College class class many variety different look can start when? Week Aug 22, 2005 come on

Expressive: Competencies examples of utterances different words used, mean length utterance, etc. chronological and hearing age academic, functional, and developmental

Expressive: Competencies What are academic language skills? language needed by students to do work in school How can the skill be evaluated? informal expressive language samples, classroom data Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Competencies What are functional language/communication skills? forms of behavior that express needs, wants, feelings and preferences that others can understand. How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples, observation Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Expressive: Competencies What are developmental language skills? following a natural progression (milestones) for mastering the skills of expressive language How can the skill be evaluated? informal language samples developmental checklists formal assessment Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Essential Elements Receptive Functional Listening Auditory Skills Speechreading Components Competencies Supports

Receptive Language and Communication V Va VA Av A Visual Mostly visual with auditory support Equal use of visual and auditory Mostly auditory with visual support Auditory ASL Combined modes Combined modes Combined modes listening Manually Coded English home signs gestures Simultaneous Communication (Sim- Com)/ Signed Supported Speech (SSS) Simultaneous Communication (Sim- Com)/ Signed Supported Speech (SSS) Simultaneous Communication (Sim- Com)/ Signed Supported Speech (SSS) speaking vocalizations

Receptive: Functional Listening and Auditory Skills What is the skill? hearing the sounds and perceiving the meaning of the sounds How can the skill be evaluated? audiological evaluations functional listening evaluations auditory skill tests informal data collection Who can evaluate the skill? Audiologists, Teachers. and Speech Language Pathologists

Receptive: Speechreading What is the skill? using what you see on the speaker s lips as well as facial expressions and gestures to understand language and communication (also known as lipreading) How can the skill be evaluated? formal lipreading tests informal assessment Who can evaluate the skill? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Receptive: Components Listening Signs Fingerspelling

Receptive: Competencies What are the skills? Academic Functional Developmental Chronological Age/Hearing Age How can the skills be evaluated? informal checklists Who can evaluate the skills? Teachers and Speech Language Pathologists

Receptive: Supports What are the skills? use of interpreting services use of real time captioning How can the skills be evaluated? observations informal checklists Who can evaluate the skills? teacher, interpreters, captionists

Implementation How can I start? 1. Sample students current FIEs or PLAAFPs. 2. Apply Essential Elements. 3. Fine tune areas that are mostly complete. 4. Determine a process for collecting information on areas that are absent.

Implementation Collect data that is meaningful, understandable, and useful. Determine what skills need to be evaluated and who will evaluate them. Ensure all involved service providers collaborate. Use a variety of tools. Apply the data to decision making.

Kelley Watt, M. Ed Region 4 ESC kelley.watt@esc4.net 713.744.6363 Sandra Connatser, M. Ed Connatser Consulting, Inc. connatserconsulting@gmail.com 281.250.5151