NIH Public Access Author Manuscript World J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.

Similar documents
PSA Doubling Time Versus PSA Velocity to Predict High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

CONTEMPORARY UPDATE OF PROSTATE CANCER STAGING NOMOGRAMS (PARTIN TABLES) FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM

estimating risk of BCR and risk of aggressive recurrence after RP was assessed using the concordance index, c.

Preoperative Gleason score, percent of positive prostate biopsies and PSA in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Controversies in Prostate Cancer Screening

Since the beginning of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era in the. Characteristics of Insignificant Clinical T1c Prostate Tumors

journal of medicine The new england Preoperative PSA Velocity and the Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy abstract

When PSA fails. Urology Grand Rounds Alexandra Perks. Rising PSA after Radical Prostatectomy

Long-Term Risk of Clinical Progression After Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Time from Surgery to Recurrence

A NEURAL NETWORK PREDICTS PROGRESSION FOR MEN WITH GLEASON SCORE 3 4 VERSUS 4 3 TUMORS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

european urology 55 (2009)

What to Do with an Abnormal PSA Test. Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

three after the most recent release in These modifications were based primarily on data from clinical, not pathological, staging [1].

Best Papers. F. Fusco

Introduction. Original Article

Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer

PREVALENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER AMONG HYPOGONADAL MEN WITH PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS OF 4.0 ng/ml OR LESS

Post Radical Prostatectomy Radiation in Intermediate and High Risk Group Prostate Cancer Patients - A Historical Series

Use of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score for predicting systemic disease and response to radiation of biochemical recurrence

Predictive factors of late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Do all men with pathological Gleason score 8 10 prostate cancer have poor outcomes? Results from the SEARCH database

PSA and the Future. Axel Heidenreich, Department of Urology

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy

BJUI. Study Type Prognosis (individual cohort study) Level of Evidence 2b OBJECTIVES CONCLUSIONS

Multiinstitutional Validation of the UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment for Prediction of Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Ja Hyeon Ku 1, Kyung Chul Moon 2, Sung Yong Cho 1, Cheol Kwak 1 and Hyeon Hoe Kim 1

Use of early PSA velocity to predict eventual abnormal PSA values in men at risk for prostate cancer {

in 32%, T2c in 16% and T3 in 2% of patients.

J Clin Oncol 25: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Distribution of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and percentage free PSA in a contemporary screening cohort with no evidence of prostate cancer

Detection & Risk Stratification for Early Stage Prostate Cancer

The prognostic significance of percentage of tumour involvement according to disease risk group in men treated with radical prostatectomy

BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Although the test that measures total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been

Evaluation of prognostic factors after radical prostatectomy in pt3b prostate cancer patients in Japanese population

Information Content of Five Nomograms for Outcomes in Prostate Cancer

Repeating an abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level: how relevant is a decrease in PSA?

PROSTATE BIOPSY: IS AGE IMPORTANT FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES IN PROSTATE CANCER?

Correspondence should be addressed to Taha Numan Yıkılmaz;

Are Prostate Carcinoma Clinical Stages T1c and T2 Similar?

Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand PSA Testing Policy 2009

Predictors of time to biochemical recurrence in a radical prostatectomy cohort within the PSA-era

Elevated PSA. Dr.Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe Associate Consultant Medical Oncology National University Cancer Institute, Singapore 9 th July 2017

Histopathological findings in extended prostate biopsy with PSA 4 ng/ml

RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IS ONE

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara , Japan 2

A Nomogram Predicting Long-term Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

BJUI. Long-term overall survival and metastasis-free survival for men with prostate-specific antigenrecurrent

Proposed prognostic scoring system evaluating risk factors for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after salvage radiation therapy

Chapter 2. Understanding My Diagnosis

A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Secondary Gleason Pattern Predictive Ability for Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy

External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer

Supplemental Information

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics, total prostate-specific antigen, and percentage of free/total prostate-specific antigen distribution Age Groups

concordance indices were calculated for the entire model and subsequently for each risk group.

Prostate Cancer: 2010 Guidelines Update

Optimal Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen Level to Distinguish Risk of Prostate Cancer in Healthy Men Between 40 and 69 Years of Age

Division of Urologic Surgery and Duke Prostate Center (DPC), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Abnormal PSA tests. Delays in referral

Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy

UC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works

Ambulatory and Office Urology Optimal Measure of PSA Kinetics to Identify Prostate Cancer

(2015) : 85 (5) ISSN

1. INTRODUCTION. ARC Journal of Urology Volume 1, Issue 1, 2016, PP 1-7 Abstract:

Clinical Study Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery in T3 Prostate Cancer: Experience of a Single Tertiary Center

Radical Prostatectomy versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer

Oncologic Outcome of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in the High-Risk Setting

2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine. Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations

Accepted for publication 3 January 2005

Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing of Older Men

PREDICTION OF PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSION

Developing a new score system for patients with PSA ranging from 4 to 20 ng/ ml to improve the accuracy of PCa detection

Prostate-Specific Antigen in 2006: Effective Use in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer

J Clin Oncol 28: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

GUIDELINES ON PROSTATE CANCER

Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer

Short ( 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Medical Policy Manual. Topic: Systems Pathology in Prostate Cancer Date of Origin: December 30, 2010

Department of Urology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

Contribution of prostate-specific antigen density in the prediction of prostate cancer: Does prostate volume matter?

Validation of the 2015 Prostate Cancer Grade Groups for Predicting Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in a Shared Equal-Access Health System

Results From the SEARCH Database

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 58 (2010)

of Nebraska - Lincoln

AJCC Cancer Staging 8 th Edition. Prostate Chapter 58. Executive Committee, AJCC. Professor and Director, Duke Prostate Center

10/2/2018 OBJECTIVES PROSTATE HEALTH BACKGROUND THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX PHI*: BETTER PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION

Disease-specific death and metastasis do not occur in patients with Gleason score 6 at radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy as radical cure of prostate cancer in a high risk group: A single-institution experience

Association of [ 2]proPSA with Biopsy Reclassification During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

Invasion of the muscular wall of the seminal vesicles by prostate cancer is generally

Risk Factors for Clinical Metastasis in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Immediate Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy

and integrated discrimination improvement were measured. The method of Begg and Greenes was used to adjust for verification bias.

Systems Pathology in Prostate Cancer. Description

Conceptual basis for active surveillance

Prognostic Value of Surgical Margin Status for Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy

Comparative Analysis Research of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

The Continuing Role of PSA in the Detection and Management of Prostate Cancer

Department of Urology, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA 4

Transcription:

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: World J Urol. 2011 February ; 29(1): 11 14. doi:10.1007/s00345-010-0625-4. Significance of preoperative PSA velocity in men with low serum PSA and normal DRE Danil V. Makarov, Department of Urology and The Section on Value and Comparative Effectiveness, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA. Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY, USA Stacy Loeb, Baltimore, MD, USA. Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287-2101, USA Ahmed Magheli, Department of Urology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany Kevin Zhao, Baltimore, MD, USA Elizabeth Humphreys, Baltimore, MD, USA Mark L. Gonzalgo, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Alan W. Partin, and Baltimore, MD, USA Misop Han Baltimore, MD, USA Stacy Loeb: stacyloeb@gmail.com Abstract Objectives A PSA velocity (PSAV) >0.35 ng/ml/year approximately 10 15 years prior to diagnosis is associated with a greater risk of lethal prostate cancer. Some have recommended that a PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year should prompt a prostate biopsy in men with a low serum PSA (<4 ng/ ml) and benign DRE. However, less is known about the utility of this PSAV cutpoint for the prediction of treatment outcomes among men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Between 1992 and 2007, 339 men underwent RP at our institution with a preoperative PSA <4 ng/ml, benign DRE, and multiple preoperative PSA measurements. PSAV was calculated by linear regression analysis using all PSA values within 18 months prior to diagnosis. Kaplan Correspondence to: Stacy Loeb, stacyloeb@gmail.com. Conflict of interest The authors certify that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest with respect to this manuscript.

Makarov et al. Page 2 Meier survival analysis was performed, and biochemical progression rates were compared between PSAV strata using the log-rank test. Results The preoperative PSAV was >0.35 ng/ml/year in 124 (36.6%) of 339 men. Although there were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics based upon PSAV, men with a PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year were significantly more likely to experience biochemical progression after RP at a median follow-up of 4 years (P = 0.022). Conclusions In this low-risk population with a preoperative PSA <4 ng/ml and benign DRE, approximately 1/3 had a preoperative PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year. Physicians should carefully monitor men with a preoperative PSA >0.35 ng/ml/year as they are at increased risk of biochemical progression following RP. Keywords Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Pathologic stage; PSA; PSAV; Gleason score Introduction Methods In 1994, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved PSA for prostate cancer screening using a threshold value of 4 ng/ml [1]. However, a considerable proportion of prostate cancer is detected at PSA levels less than 4 ng/ml. For example, in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, men with a PSA <4 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination throughout the 7-year study period were offered an end-of-study biopsy [2]. This revealed that biopsy-detectable prostate cancer was present in 15.2% of these men. It is well-established that men with lower total PSA levels have more favorable treatment outcomes. In 2804 men with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer, Antenor et al. showed that the 10-year progression-free survival rates were 88, 80, 76, and 61% for men with total PSA levels from 2.6 to 4.0, 4.1 to 7.0, 7.1 to 10.0, and >10.0 ng/ml, respectively (P = 0.0001) [3]. At Johns Hopkins, Han et al. reported 10-year actuarial progression-free survival rates of 91, 79, 57, and 48% for men with PSA levels 4.0, 4.1 to 10.0, 10.1 to 20.0, and >20.0 ng/ml, respectively [4]. A subsequent study demonstrated men with PSA <4 ng/ml, had lower rates of high-risk pathology and demonstrated a trend toward decreased biochemical recurrence [5]. Several recent studies have demonstrated a relationship between preoperative PSA velocity and disease-specific outcomes [1,6]. Less is known about the optimal predictors of tumor aggressiveness and treatment outcomes in the specific sub-population of men with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer and a PSA level <4 ng/ml. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the prognostic value of PSA velocity for men meeting these criteria from a large radical prostatectomy database. From 1992 to 2007, 3705 men underwent surgery at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions by one of three of the highest volume surgeons, who collected data on all available preoperative PSA measurements. We excluded men with PSA of 4 ng/ml or greater (2,875), those with clinical stage greater than T1c (256), those with only a single preoperative PSA measurement (234), and those with missing pathology reports (1). This left a study cohort of 339 men with multiple preoperative PSA measurements available to enable a PSA velocity determination. Data on the serial PSA measurements recorded prior to diagnosis were obtained retrospectively from the medical record. None of the men in the study sample

Makarov et al. Page 3 received neoadjuvant therapy. The institutional review board at Johns Hopkins approved this study and, when required, written informed consent was obtained from study participants. Results Discussion PSA velocity was calculated by linear regression using all available PSA values measured in the 18 months prior to diagnosis. The chi-square (categorical variables) and Mann Whitney U (continuous variables) tests were used to compare clinical and pathological features between men with a PSAV 0.35 ng/ml/year and >0.35 ng/ml/year. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios for pathological outcomes. Biochemical progression was defined as a postoperative PSA level 0.2 ng/ml [7]. Biochemical progression-free survival curves were created using the Kaplan Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test. STATA (College Station, TX) was used for all statistical analysis. A total of 339 patients had clinical stage T1c prostate cancer and a preoperative PSA <4 ng/ ml. The PSAV was 0.35 ng/ml/year in 215 (63%) and >0.35 ng/ml/year in the remaining 124 (37%). Table 1a shows the demographics of the study population stratified by PSAV. The majority of men were white in both groups, and the date of surgery was similar. There were no statistically significant differences in age, preoperative PSA, or biopsy Gleason score between the groups. Table 1b demonstrates the surgical pathology findings in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Overall, 296 (87.3%) had organ-confined disease, 15 (4.4%) had positive surgical margins, and 3 (0.9%) had seminal vesicle invasion. None had lymph node metastases. There was no significant difference in the odds of adverse pathological features between men with PSAV 0.35 ng/ml/year and >0.35 ng/ml/year (Table 2). At a median follow-up of 4 years (range, 1 9 years), biochemical progression occurred in 4% of men with a preoperative PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year and in none with a lower PSAV (P = 0.017, chi squared). Figure 1 shows the Kaplan Meier progression-free survival curve, wherein a PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year was associated with a significantly greater risk of progression (P = 0.022). In the subset with biochemical progression, the mean preoperative PSA and PSAV were 2.63 ng/ml and 1.00 ng/ml/year, respectively. Sixty-seven percent had non-organ-confined disease, and all demonstrated Gleason pattern 4 in the surgical specimen. The median time to failure was 3 years, with a mean postoperative PSA doubling time of 28.7 months. PSAV was initially described as a means to differentiate between benign conditions and prostate cancer in men with total PSA levels from 4 to 10 ng/ml [8]. In such men from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, it was demonstrated that a PSAV >0.75 ng/ml/year was significantly associated with prostate cancer. The use of PSAV to aid in prostate cancer diagnosis was subsequently confirmed in a screened population with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/ml [9]. However, the majority of men in the general population have total PSA levels <4 ng/ml. Thus, recent studies have attempted to evaluate whether PSAV is also useful for prostate cancer detection among men with lower total PSA levels. Loeb et al. examined 11,792 men with total PSA levels <4 ng/ml and demonstrated that PSAV was significantly associated with prostate cancer detection [10]. On multivariate analysis, PSAV remained a significant

Makarov et al. Page 4 Conclusions Acknowledgments References independent predictor of prostate cancer even after adjusting for age, race, family history, and the total PSA level. However, a lower PSAV cutpoint of approximately 0.4 ng/ml/year was associated with the best performance characteristics in these men. In the Duke database, Moul et al. similarly showed that a cutpoint in the range of 0.4 ng/ml/year was useful for prostate cancer diagnosis [11]. The previous studies address the use of PSAV for prostate cancer detection; however, less is known about its role in prognostication for men with total PSA levels <4 ng/ml. Carter et al. showed that a PSAV threshold of 0.35 ng/ml/year 10 15 years prior to diagnosis (at a time when the PSA level was low) was associated with a 5-fold increased risk of prostate cancer death [12]. We wished to explore whether this threshold would also be useful for prognostication in the immediate pretreatment setting for patients with low PSA levels at the time of diagnosis. We therefore evaluated the association between PSAV and radical prostatectomy outcomes in men with a PSA <4 ng/ml and non-palpable disease. Indeed, we found that those men with a PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year were at significantly greater risk for biochemical progression. Some limitations of our study deserve mention. First, PSAV was calculated by regression of PSAs recorded in the 18 months prior to diagnosis, which differs from the method used in some other studies. A selection bias may also have been introduced into the study population as many of the men in our radical prostatectomy database either did not have sufficient serial preoperative PSA measurements to enable a PSAV calculation or were not able to provide these data. Based on our sample, we are unable to assess the characteristics of men without PSAVs and the reasons for which their PSAVs were unavailable. Additionally, while our sample has a substantial number of patients within it, our Kaplan Meier and log-rank analyses are based on a small number of events. A PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year at 10 15 years prior to diagnosis has previously been associated with a greater risk of later prostate cancer-specific mortality. In our radical prostatectomy series, approximately 1/3 of men with clinical stage T1c disease and a preoperative PSA <4 ng/ml had a PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year. In accord with prior studies, these men had a significantly greater risk of biochemical progression. Our results suggest that PSAV may be useful to further stratify the risk of adverse treatment outcomes in this low-risk patient population. Supported by the National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute SPORE Grant #P50CA58236, The Prostate Cancer Foundation, Early Detection Research Network/NCI/NIH Grant number U01-CA86323, and the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. 1. Sengupta S, Myers RP, Slezak JM, et al. Preoperative prostate specific antigen doubling time and velocity are strong and independent predictors of outcomes following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005;174:2191. [PubMed: 16280762] 2. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2239. [PubMed: 15163773] 3. Antenor JA, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, et al. Preoperative PSA and progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy for Stage T1c disease. Urology 2005;66:156. [PubMed: 15992903]

Makarov et al. Page 5 4. Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, et al. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:555. [PubMed: 11590814] 5. Makarov DV, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs. 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml. J Urol 2006;176:554. [PubMed: 16813888] 6. D Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA, et al. Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2004;351:125. [PubMed: 15247353] 7. Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 2007;177:540. [PubMed: 17222629] 8. Carter HB, Pearson JD, Metter EJ, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. Jama 1992;267:2215. [PubMed: 1372942] 9. Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Rate of change in serum prostate specific antigen levels as a method for prostate cancer detection. J Urol 1994;152:1163. [PubMed: 7520949] 10. Loeb S, Roehl KA, Nadler RB, et al. Prostate specific antigen velocity in men with total prostate specific antigen less than 4 ng/ml. J Urol 2007;178:2348. [PubMed: 17936844] 11. Moul JW, Sun L, Hotaling JM, et al. Age adjusted prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen velocity cut points in prostate cancer screening. J Urol 2007;177:499. [PubMed: 17222618] 12. Carter HB, Ferrucci L, Kettermann A, et al. Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1521. [PubMed: 17077354]

Makarov et al. Page 6 Fig. 1. Kaplan Meier biochemical progression-free survival curve stratified by PSA velocity

Makarov et al. Page 7 Table 1 Comparison of (a) clinical and (b) pathological features between radical prostatectomy patients with a preoperative PSAV 0.35 versus >0.35 ng/ml/year (a) Race PSAV 0.35 ng/ml/year PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year P-value Non-black 96.3% 95.2% 0.431 Black 3.7% 4.8% Year of surgery (median) 2002 2002 0.386 Mean age (years) 56.1 55.0 0.092 Median PSA prior to diagnostic biopsy (ng/ml) 3.2 3.2 0.583 Biopsy Gleason score (b) 6 87.5% 90.3% 0.578 7 12.5% 9.7% Organ-confined 84.7% 91.9% 0.052 Positive margins 5.1% 3.2% 0.415 Seminal vesicle invasion 0.9% 0.8% 0.907 Lymph node metastases 0 0 0.540 RP Gleason score 6 87.5% 84.5% 0.701 7 12.5% 15.5% Biochemical progression 0 4.0% 0.017

Makarov et al. Page 8 Table 2 Odds of adverse pathological features in men with a pre-operative PSAV >0.35 ng/ml/year, relative to a PSAV 0.35 ng/ml/year Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value Non-organ-confined 0.5 (0.2 1.0) 0.056 Positive margins 0.6 (0.2 5.3) 0.880 Extraprostatic extension 3.3 (0.2 1.7) 0.289 Seminal vesicle invasion 1.01 (0.1 11.9) 0.993 Gleason score 7 1.5 (0.7 3.1) 0.267