International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 4, 2017,

Similar documents
PREVALENCE OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PROBLEMS AND AWKWARD POSTURE IN A PAKISTANI GARMENTS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Evaluation of work Posture by RULA and REBA: A Case Study

C H A P T E R. Assessment of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders & Postural Stress. Posture & Stress

International Conference on Advances in Engineering & Technology 2014 (ICAET-2014) 52 Page

International Journal on Emerging Technologies 5(2): 61-65(2014) ISSN No. (Print) : ISSN No. (Online) :

Ergonomics 101: CREATING A PLAYBOOK FOR WORKSTATION ANALYSIS

Risk assessment of handloom weavers for musculoskeletal disorder in durrie unit

Maine. Video Display Terminal Law. Training Program SAFE345

An Ergonomic Evaluation & Assessment Of The Workstation To Improve The Productivity For An Enterprise:-A Review

Anthropometric Measurements of Garment Manufacturing Workers of Tirupur, Tamilnadu

CITY OF TURLOCK ERGONOMICS POLICY

Prepared by the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. 5th Edition

Evaluation of Ergonomic Postures of Physical Education and Sport Science by REBA and Its Relation to Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders

Ergonomics Application to Work Design on Seafood Processing Line

Regulatory Requirements

ERGONOMICS. Risk Management

WORK POSTURE AND PREVALENCE OF MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMPTOMS AMONG WOMEN IN PACKING ACTIVITIES OF

Choosing the right Office Chair

XXXIII IULTCS Congress November, 24 th 27 th, 2015 Novo Hamburgo/Brazil

Risk Factors and Control Measures for Musculoskeletal Injuries. Presented by: Gina Vahlas, Ergonomist Chloe Eaton, Ergonomist

Ergonomics Evaluation of Body Posture of Worker In SSI

Ergonomics. Best Practices Lifting Tips and Techniques (EOHSS)

ERI Safety Videos Videos for Safety Meetings. ERGONOMICS EMPLOYEE TRAINING: Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders. Leader s Guide 2001, ERI PRODUCTIONS

Practicing Office Ergonomics: or..my Arms Are Too Short!?

Ergonomic Risk Factors Resolved in Microelectronics Shop at Naval Air Station Jacksonville

Ergonomics and Back Safety PPT-SM-BACKSFTY V.A.0.0

Manual Handling/Manual Tasks Checklist

Ergonomics in Sonography

A Report Based on Analysis of Posture and Occupational Health of Welders in Different Welding Units

EVALUATION OF RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH WORK-RELATED MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS OF UPPER LIMBS EXTREMITY AMONG PRESS WORKERS

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACTION LEVELS FOR THE QUICK EXPOSURE CHECK (QEC) SYSTEM

Department of Defense Ergonomics Working Group

Ergonomics Glossary. Force The amount of physical effort a person uses to do a task.

Strains and Sprains. Signs and Symptoms of MSI

Identifying and Solving Ergonomics Problems in Coal Preparation and Mineral Processing Plants Jonisha P. Pollard

Basic Ergonomics for Logistics and Transport Operations. DR NG WEE TONG Mb.ChB, MMED (OM), Dip Av Med, Dip Geri Med

ERGONOMICS IN THE WORKPLACE

Reducing Computer Workstation Hazards Through Proper Set-up and Design

Ergonomics and therapy- An introduction DR.AYESHA BSPT, PPDPT

Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomics Improvement by Using ISO/TS

Ergonomics in the Workplace 15% 74% take OTC painkillers/ medication

A Method for Non-experts in Assessing Exposure to Risk Factors for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders ERIN

Ergonomic Education For Computer Workstations

Mastering the Tools of the Ergonomics Trade David Alexander, PE, CPE Auburn Engineers, Inc.

ERGONOMIC CHECKLIST. Area: Date of Survey: Assessors Name: BODY PART RISK FACTORS NECK/SHOULDER ELBOW HAND/WRIST Carpel tunnel

Ergonomic Analysis for the Armoured Personnel Carrier Driver

Enhancing Safety Through Ergonomics

Ergonomics and the Farm. Keri A. Gill-Smith, Physical Therapist

Ergonomics Intervention Study of the RULA/REBA Method in Chemical Industries for MSDs Risk Assessment

Setting big things into motion.

Office Ergonomics OSHA Resources. Risk Factors for Developing MSDs taken from OSHA voluntary guidelines. Mary Loughlin, OTR/L,CHT, CEAS

Muhammad Ramadhani 1), Rukman 2), Darul Prayogo 3), Diajeng Ayu D. P 4) Corresponding Author: Darul Prayogo

KEEPING IRONWORKERS HEALTHY: ERGONOMICS AND WMSDs

The Art & Science of Fitting the Work to the Person

Element B9 / 2 Assessing Risks MSD s / Man Handling / Poor Posture

DESIGN OF WELDING ARMREST BASED ON ERGONOMICS ANALYSIS: CASE STUDY AT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION IN JOHOR BAHRU, MALAYSIA

Ergonomic recommendations

Biomechanical risk factors among the assembly line workers of a cosmetics manufacturing factory in India

Adjust the chair height so that your feet rest comfortably on the floor, footrest or foot ring.

whoah billy, that s no way to lift a heavy weight Stay healthy and happy at work with advice from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy

Research Article Ergonomic Study and Design of the Pulpit of a Wire Rod Mill at an Integrated Steel Plant

ERGONOMICS IN VETERINARY CARE

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

The Evolution of Human s? Objectives. Agenda. Defining Ergonomics. History of Ergonomics. Office Ergonomics Train the Trainer.

Ergonomics. For additional assistance, contact the Occupational Safety office to schedule an evaluation.

Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders in Garment Workers: Practical and Obstacles

Outline Are You Getting Hurt? Ergonomic for Fitness Professionals

An Ergonomic Study on Human Drudgery and Musculoskeletal Disorders by Rice Transplanting

DESIGN OF ERGONOMIC STOOL (DINGKLIK) FOR BATIK CRAFTERS

Fleet Readiness Center (FRC) East Uses Lazy Susan Design to Prevent Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

The Art & Science of Fitting the Work to the Person

Environmental Health & Safety

Office Ergonomics and Workstation Analysis

Office Ergonomics: Best Practices and Results. Mike Lampl, MS, CPE Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation (BWC)

Corporate Safety Manual. Chapter 8 Office Ergonomics

Ergonomics and Risk Factor Awareness PART 2

Office Ergonomics Handbook Table of Contents

A Comparison of Three Observational Techniques for Assessing Postural Loads in Industry

Ergonomics: Why do workers get injured? Presented by: Steve Bilan Ergonomic Specialist

Ergonomic Exposure to Company XYZ's. Employees by Adjusting to a Mixed. Engine Model Assembly Line. by Andrew Englund

REVIEW CONTROL ASSESS IDENTIFY CONSULT CONSULT CONSULT CONSULT

Early Intervention in the Utilities Sector Best Practices Lead to Real Results

Ergonomics Wanda Daley Drive Ames, Iowa (515) Copyright

PURPOSE To provide the tools to set up and maintain a healthy office workspace & environment

Manual/handouts Course Schedule Starting/ending times Rest rooms Fire exits Telephones Group Introductions

Keywords: Assessment, Limb, Musculoskeletal

This was good at the time - see ergoanalyst.com for the latest in manual tasks risk management

CMTM10 INVESTIGATION ON UPPER LIMB AND LOWER BACK MUSCLES ACTIVITIES DURING SEDENTARY WORK.

Identification of Ergonomics Risk Factors in the Fishery Industry

Ergonomic risks and manual handling ruhioktem.blogspot.com 1/69

Courtesy of your source for the best ergonomic office furniture.

Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA)

TRAINING PACKAGE DISPLAY SCREEN EQUIPMENT (DSE) Any alphanumeric or graphic display screen, regardless of the display process involved

Setting up Your Home Office

Lecture 3: Workplace Design Physical work

International Journal of Medical and Exercise Science (Multidisciplinary, Peer Reviewed and Indexed Journal)

Ergonomics Keeping the Worker on the Job

Comparison between sedentary work and standing work related musculoskeletal symptoms

Reference Material Searched and Brought to you

BF X Furniture. Ergonomic Assessment Checklist

Transcription:

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 4, 2017, 2469 2474 ISSN 2278-3687 (O) 2277-663X (P) WORK POSTURE ASSESSMENT OF TAILORS BY RULA AND REBA ANALYSIS Upasana and Deepa Vinay Department of Family Resource Management, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar 263145 (Uttarakhand) E mail: upasana35954@gmail.com Abstract: Tailors were performing various activities to create new pieces of clothing from patterns and designs or alter existing garments to fit to the customers. Due to nature of these job tailors adopted awkward posture and repetitive motion, which cause musculoskeletal discomfort and occupational health hazards. Therefore the present study was undertaken to evaluate the various tasks performed by tailors, and work posture adopted by them, while operating the sewing machine. The study was conducted on 60 male respondents engaged with tailoring profession from Pantnagar (Uttarakhand, India). The result of postural analysis by RULA and REBA score indicate that more than 65%, 60% and 58% of the respondents were under in high risk when performing ironing, stitching and cutting activity at the workplace. The majority of the respondents reported that high rate of musculoskeletal discomforts were not avoided due to the job characteristic of tailors. The above findings indicate that the tailors were doing very hard but not realizing the risks of musculoskeletal discomforts associated with their workstation, tasks and working postures. Keywords: awkward posture, musculoskeletal discomfort, tailors, workplace. INTRODUCTION In India, textile industry had its beginning during the first half of the 20 th century and witnessed impressive growth during the last four decades. The textile industry is primarily concerned with the production of yarn, and cloth and the subsequent design or manufacture of clothing and their distribution. The process of producing complete garment is include spinning the yarns, making cotton bundles, preparing fabrics, cutting and stitching of the fabric etc. Whereas, textile sector also includes self employed garment workers or tailors, who work in their own work shop and only prepare garment as per the choice of customers. The main activities performed by the tailors at their workstation are dealing with the customer, taking measurement of the customer, cutting of the fabric, stitching of the fabric, finishing of the stitched garment, ironing to the stitched garment and inspection of stitched garment. Tailors face a substantially higher risk of muscle pain and injury than workers involved in other jobs because the frequency of postural discomfort increases with years of employment. Received July 4, 2017 * Published Aug 2, 2017 * www.ijset.net

2470 Upasana and Deepa Vinay Factors such as repetition, force, stress and strain, and vibration are associated with higher rates of injury. Even though many technologies have been developed in textile sector, but the tailors are still using the foot treadle and hand wheel sewing machine. These machines work on manual power have been the cause of some accidents due to the repetitive and continuous pressure giving by hand and foot. Tailors are working at the workplace from morning to late night. Workspace is concern with the design of the local space in which workers must spend considerable time and efforts for doing their job. In this respect, it is very personal process in that workers feel a sense of ownership for the workstation. Any mismatch between the worker and the work environment leads to mental and physical stress causing occupational risks. In the fast-paced environment of tailoring, a common attitude is that accidents are inevitable. But injuries means losses i.e. loss of money, loss of time and loss of productivity. The compatibility between the workers and the workstation is very essential. While designing these workstations, clearance, reach and comfort of the workers need to be taken into consideration. The tailor s job involves monotonous, highly repetitive tasks performed in a sitting working posture with upper back curved and head bent over the sewing machine. The work is visually demanding and requires a high degree of concentration and accuracy. Research on working conditions and associated problems in the garment workstation unit have been conducted by Maier, E. et al. (2002) and his findings supported the outcomes expected from work environments with poor ergonomic features, including constrained postures, repetitive motions and strong visual demands. Ranney et al. (1995) suggested that one of the worst aspects of sewing machine operations in the garment manufacturing is the body posture operators are forced to assume throughout the workday. Anecdotal evidence points to congestion in people and equipment, excessive heat and humidity, poor furniture and physical workstation design. Prolonged sitting, in unnatural postures is not uncommon and is often accompanied with seats that have no backrests. So, the purpose of present study is to combining ergonomics with tailors who are involved in tailoring activities, to elicit the role of physical work demand and to assess the potential risk factor for developing musculoskeletal symptoms in workers involved in tailoring operation. Hence, the present study was undertaken with the following objectives: To analyze the tasks performed by tailors when using sewing machine. To assess the different work posture of tailors while operating the sewing machine.

Work Posture Assessment of Tailors by Rula and Reba Analysis. 2471 MATERIAL AND METHODS Purposively random sampling design was used to select the study area and the selection of the respondents from Pantnagar, of U. S. Nagar District of Uttarakhand state. Total sample sizes of 60 male respondents were taken for the present study. These 60 respondents were working in 14 tailor boutique shops. The descriptive data was collected with the use of precoded interview schedule and anthropometric measurement. Experimental data was collected with the help of RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) and REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment). Three major activities were selected i.e. cutting of the fabric, stitching of the fabric and ironing to the stitched garment, for the assessment of RULA and REBA and for each activity 20 respondents were asked to performed task. RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) It is a survey method developed by Mc Atamney and Corlett, (1993) for use in ergonomics investigation of workplaces where work related upper limb disorders are reported. A coding system is used to generate an action list which indicates the level of intervention required to reduce the risks of injury due to physical loading on the operator. REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) REBA was proposed by Hignett and McAtamney (2000) and use as a quick assessment of the postures of the upper limbs as well as lower limbs along with muscle function and the external loads experienced by the body. A coding system is used to generate an action list which indicates the level of intervention required to reduce the risks of injury due to physical loading on the operator. RESULT AND DISCUSSION RULA score indicate that in cutting activity, the same proportion of 40 percents of the respondents were under score in 3 or 4, and 5 or 6 which means change soon and further investigate. Only 15 percent of the respondents were under in safe zone (figure-1). In stitching activity, majority (55%) of the respondents were under score in 5 or 6, whereas 30 percent of the respondents were under score in 7 or more, which means they were under in high risk (Figure-1). In ironing activity, majority (65%) of the respondents were under score in 5 or 6, whereas 25 percent of the respondents were under score in 7 or more, and it was found that in ironing activity no one in safe zone (figure- 1).

2472 Upasana and Deepa Vinay Figure 1 - RULA score in various activities REBA score indicate that in cutting activity, with same proportion of 45 percents of the respondents were under score in 2 or 3 and 4 or 7, whereas 5 percent of the respondents were under score in 8 to 10 which means they were under high risk. In stitching activity, majority (40%) of the respondents were under score in11or more, which indicate that respondents were under at very high risk and about 35 percent of the respondents were under in 4 to 7 score, which indicate that respondents at medium risk. In ironing activity, 30percent of the respondents were under score in11or more, which means respondents were under at very high risk and no one at low risk and in safe zone in ironing activity of the tailors (Figure 2). Figure 2- REBA score in various activities

Work Posture Assessment of Tailors by Rula and Reba Analysis. 2473 Figure 3: Pain in different body parts while performing various activities The various static workstation activities lead to prolong sitting which cause musculoskeletal discomfort mainly in neck, shoulder, lower back and upper back. Majority of the respondents reported pain in neck and shoulder when performing cutting activity. Respondents were also complaining occurrence of severe lower back pain when they engaged in stitching and ironing activity. This is because after prolong sitting and standing task and they have stress of work from the whole day work task. The above figure 3 shows the pain in different body parts of the tailors while performing three major activities i.e. cutting of the fabric, stitching of the fabric and ironing to the stitched garment at the workstation. Tailors were experiencing high frequency of pain when ever work has done with medium intensity of pain in different parts of the body. Some of the respondents faced problems to reach comfortably at the workstation for performing different activities related to tailoring. Conclusion Tailors are manual workers who work at the workstation for a period of time with repetitive activities like cutting the fabric, stitching the fabric, finishing, ironing etc and mainly adapting awkward posture repeatedly in each continuous process of preparing garment. RULA and REBA scale revealed that none of the respondents were having acceptable posture

2474 Upasana and Deepa Vinay to be continued. Maximum number of the respondents adopted different posture that were not acceptable where they should be investigated further and change soon or immediately so that the respondents may not be in danger of musculoskeletal disorders. The risks for tailors have been linked to conditions adverse to the health. Thus an ergonomically fit workstation design was suggested by giving the recommended features to have smooth work flow of the tailors. References [1] Anderson, J.H. and Gaardboe, O. 1993. Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb among sewing machine operators: a clinical investigation. Journal of Occupational medicine, 24: 689-700. [2] Baoa, S.; Howarda, N.; Spielholza, P. and Silverstein, B. 2007. Two posture analysis approaches and their application in a modified RULA evaluation. Journal of Ergonomics, 50(2): 2118-2136. [3] Chaffin, B.; Keyserling, D. and Yu, C.Y. 2007. Development of a work seat for industrial sewing operations. Ergonomics, 31(12): 1765-1786. [4] Chi-Yuang, Y. and Keyserling, W. 1989. Evaluation of a new work seat for Industrial sewing operations. Applied Ergonomics, 20(1): 17-25. [5] Delleman, N.J. and Dul, J. 1990. Ergonomic guidelines for adjustment and redesign of sewing machine workplaces. International Journal of Occupational Environmental Health, 13(3): 367-369. [6] Edith, M. 2001. Lighting and occupational health and safety among sewing machine operators. Ergonomics, 13(3): 507-509. [7] Gaardboe, O. and Anderson, J.H. 1993. Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb among sewing machine operators: a clinical investigation. Journal of Occupational medicine, 24: 689-700. [8] Guangyan, Li. 1997. Factors Affecting Posture for Machine Sewing Tasks. Journal of Industrial Health, 18: 35-46. [9] Halpern, C.A. and Dawson, K.D. 1997. Design and implementation of a participatory ergonomics program for machine sewing tasks. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20: 429-440.