Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering (DST) (Zückner 2016) Instructions on filling in the questionnaire, evaluation and statistical data

Similar documents
Affective Control Scale

The Palin Parent Rating Scales

ADOLESCENT FLUENCY CASE HISTORY

Assessment of the Child s Experience of Stuttering (ACES) (DRAFT VERSION September 27, 2006)

10/9/2018. Ways to Measure Variables. Three Common Types of Measures. Scales of Measurement

Brief User s Manual First Edition 2003

University of Oregon HEDCO Clinic Fluency Center. Diagnostic Intake Form for Adults Who Stutter

Running head: ASSESSMENT EVALUATION OF THE EATING 1

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY, DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS

THE SOCIALABILITY QUESTIONAIRE: AN INDEX OF SKILL

Identifying Your Problematic Thoughts

Relationship Questionnaire

Therapy for Young Stuttering Children with Cognitive and Emotional Problems

Seattle Personality Inventory Kindergarten-Grade 1 / Years 1-2 Fast Track Project Technical Report Mark Greenberg & Lili Lengua November 10, 1995

Use This: If time is tight: Make sure the child understands the rationale and adds some new content to the trauma narrative

Assessing the Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Dimensions of Stuttering in Young Children

copyrighted material by PRO-ED, Inc.

ADDES-3 QUICK SCORE SCHOOL VERION PROFILE SAMPLE

University of New England August, Kimaya Sarmukadam Vicki Bitsika Chris Sharpley

Do not write your name on this examination all 40 best

Changing Negative Thoughts

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy in Secure Services Calverton Hill & Priory Hospital East Midlands Priory Group

Does anxiety cause some difficulty for a young person you know well? What challenges does this cause for the young person in the family or school?

Changes to your behaviour

1. Evaluate the methodological quality of a study with the COSMIN checklist

VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT

Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Social Presence Measure

Construct and predictive validity of the Comprehensive Neurodiagnostic Checklist 10/20 (CNC)

Theory of Mind Inventory (ToMI)

Substance Abuse Questionnaire Standardization Study

Stats 95. Statistical analysis without compelling presentation is annoying at best and catastrophic at worst. From raw numbers to meaningful pictures

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1998, 26, Cambridge University Press. Printed in the United Kingdom

Common Measurement Framework: Possible Front Runner Measures

Problem Situation Form for Parents

SHARED EXPERIENCES. Suggestions for living well with Alzheimer s disease

Having the conversation

Stuttering. Risk factors that predict a chronic problem rather than spontaneous recovery include:

Book review. Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). By C.K. Conners, D. Erhardt, M.A. Sparrow. New York: Multihealth Systems, Inc.

Trigger Worksheet. Behaviors: unable to control impulsive response leads to poor choices, later regrets and relational difficulties

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Sandra Bell, Christina Lee, Jennifer Powers and Jean Ball. Health of other family members. Living arrangements

Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias

TAKING CARE OF YOUR FEELINGS

Look to see if they can focus on compassionate attention, compassionate thinking and compassionate behaviour. This is how the person brings their

Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence

Diagnostic: 1. Parent-Child Interaction (PCI; 10 minute free play) Observe positive interactions

The Obstetrics and Gynaecology Health Psychology Service

Extraversion. The Extraversion factor reliability is 0.90 and the trait scale reliabilities range from 0.70 to 0.81.

not very only very not very often not very often not very often not very often moderately dizzy really quite dizzy really quite dizzy dizzy

Treatment Intervention Inventory Juvenile: Juvenile Intake Assessment

Representations and Adjustment Index (RADIX) Catherine Quinn, Robin Morris and Linda Clare

DVI Pre-Post: Standardization Study

Survey Project Data Analysis Guide

The State Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI)

11/15/2017. Disclosure. What is an EAP and History of Biofeedback at UCLA s Staff and Faculty Counseling Center

SERVING STUDENTS WITH AUTISM IN SCHOOLS 1

Year Piece Learning outcomes Content Safeguarding F 1/2 6.F1 Stranger danger

Validation. Carmen Bowman, MHS Certified Validation Worker and Group Practitioner

The older school aged child

Chapter 4 METHODOLOGY

Parental Permission Form. TITLE OF PROJECT: Treating Specific Phobias in Children with ADHD: Adaptation of the One-Session Treatment

Decision Tool: Options in the Hearing Clinic

Tips on How to Better Serve Customers with Various Disabilities

Loving-Kindness Meditation

General Certificate of Education January 2010 Advanced Level Examination

Executive Functioning

ORIENTATION SAN FRANCISCO STOP SMOKING PROGRAM

Talking to someone who might be suicidal

By Lora A. Connor B.A., 2008, California State University, Long Beach

ADULT-CHILD-OF-AN-ALCOHOLIC (ACA) TRAITS

Aggregate Assessment Report Summary. March 15, Adaptive Behaviour Scale Residential and Community (ABS-RC: 2) January 2005 December 2015

Stages of Change The Cognitive Factors Underlying Readiness to Manage Stuttering:Evidence from Adolescents. What Do We Mean by Motivation?

FONTBONNE UNIVERSITY Department of Communication Disorders and Deaf Education

When can your child start at a state-maintained primary school?

Levenson Psychopathy Inventory Grad 12 /Year 13 Fast Track Project Technical Report Anne-Marie Iselin and Richard L. Lamb 02/2010

Healthy Parent Carers Project - Meeting 6. 06/05/2015 South Cloisters

CHAPTER- III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The Needs of Young People who have lost a Sibling or Parent to Cancer.

Development of Self Orientation Scale for Measurement of Karen Horney s Tripartite Neurotic Trends

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 228 ( 2016 )

Self-Assessment Scales for Pre-Fitting Testing

Diana Valdez, PhD, LPC

emotional intelligence questionnaire

Factors Influencing Undergraduate Students Motivation to Study Science

ASSERT YOURSELF! ASSERT YOURSELF!

An adult version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-A)

Adverse childhood experiences, mental illness and the protective effects of resilience in Wales. Karen Hughes, Public Health Wales

module counselling values and beliefs Immigrant Settlement Counselling: A Training Guide Part 2 OCASI 2000

Briefing for employers on Asperger Syndrome

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD. method the major components include: Research Design, Research Site and

Optimal Health Questionnaire

Understanding and Recognizing Childhood Depression

SESSION TOOLS LEARNING COPING SKILLS

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Resources

THE LONG TERM PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF DAILY SEDATIVE INTERRUPTION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS

It is also possible to have a mixed hearing loss, which arises from both the above.

PEER AWARENESS ASSEMBLY NOTES

CBT+ Measures Cheat Sheet

Transcription:

Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering (DST) (Zückner 2016) Instructions on filling in the questionnaire, evaluation and statistical data Contents Page 1. Field of application 1 2. Information on filling in the questionnaire and on statistical data 1-2 3. Questionnaire 3-5 4. Scoring scheme 6-8 5. Score calculation form 9 6. Raw value percentage degree of 10 7. Result sheet 11 Field of application The Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering (DST) is a therapy-oriented questionnaire that measures the status of stuttering adults. It comprises 26 items subdivided into three subscales and has been standardized with a 212-strong group of stuttering adults (145 men, 67 women). It yields a total value (raw score of 0 to 104). These total raw scores are assigned to a nine-point scale (stanine scale) For each of the three subscales (Effect of stuttering on emotional experience / Effect of stuttering on behaviour / Effect of stuttering on higher-order areas of life), there is a five-point scale. Filling in the questionnaire Filling in the questionnaire takes roughly 5 to 10 minutes. The questionnaire is printed on pages 3 to 5 and can be filled in on paper. A pen will be additionally required. The questionnaire can also be filled in and evaluated at the computer screen. No data on the filling-in of the questionnaire are stored. The questionnaire can also be filled in anonymously. The Web address of the DST is: www.-questionnaire-stuttering.net Evaluation Evaluating the questionnaire takes roughly 5 to 10 minutes. For the evaluation there is a scoring scheme on pages 6 to 8. The item values checked by the test subjects can then be transferred to a calculation scheme. This calculation scheme can be found on page 9. 1

With reference to a scale, the raw scores can be converted into percentages and degree classifications. The raw score / percentage / degree of can be found on page 10. So that the results of the questionnaire can be saved for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, there is a record of the results. This can be used for one s own documentation and/or handed out to the test subject. The record of the results can be found on page 11. Timing The questionnaire can be filled in at the beginning of treatment, at the end of the phase, at the end of treatment or in a post-treatment control (1 to 2 years after treatment). Statistical data and results The investigation with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test yielded a normal distribution. The distribution shape is symmetrical, the skew differs only little from zero (V =.047. The kurtosis also deviates little from zero (W = -.776). Score range 0-104 Mean 43.35 Male mean (N=145) 43.1 (s = 21.9) Female mean (N=67) 43.8 (s = 20.7) Median 45 Standard deviation 21.52 Skewness.047 Kurtosis -.776 Minimum value 0 Maximum value 96 Reliability The internal consistency (Cronbach s alpha) of the overall test is α =.934. The item discrimination was calculated for each item from the correlation of the particular item with the questionnaire s total value, with the item not contributing to the overall value (corrected discrimination). The results of the corrected item scale correlation show that there are no problematical values (values under.200). In terms of items 6 and 13, there was therefore no need to remove them from the questionnaire. 2

Item Cronbach s α with item omitted Corrected item scale correlation Item Cronbach s α with item omitted Corrected item scale correlation 1.932.578 14.931.594 2.931.638 15.932.552 3.930.724 16.930.694 4.933.507 17.933.453 5.933.473 18.932.586 6.935.324 19.929.765 7.932.564 20.929.759 8.929.733 21.932.583 9.933.487 22.935.354 10.933.429 23.933.504 11.929.785 24.931.596 12.934.451 25.930.699 13.936.295 26.929.763 For the three subscales, values were also obtained for internal consistency. For the subscale Emotional experience of stuttering, α =.893. For the subscale Effect of stuttering on behaviour, α =.616, and for the subscale Effect of stuttering on higher-order areas of life, α =.863. After 4 weeks, the retest reliability value was r =.86 for the overall questionnaire (performed with 100 subjects). For the subscales, it ranges from r =.80 to r =.85. Validity To secure the criterion validity, the STAI (The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; Laux et al. 1981) was adopted. This measures state-related anxiety and trait anxiety, which can accompany social stress due to stuttering. With 34 subjects (not in treatment), both the DST and STAI were carried out. The correlations between the total score of the DST and state anxiety (r=.298, p =.05) and trait anxiety (r =.408, p =.01) were significant. In addition, 3 subscales of the Derogatis Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R. G. Franke, 2002) (Anxiety Insecurity in social contacts Phobic anxiety) were applied as a further safeguard of criterion validity. The Symptom Checklist measures the degree to which a patient suffers from mental symptoms. The correlations between the total score of the DST and the three subscales of the Symptom Checklist were also significant: Anxiety (r=.533, p=.01) Insecurity in social contacts (r=.634, p=.01) Phobic anxiety (r=.336, p=.005). 3

The results show that the DST possesses convergent validity. The two gender groups do not show significant differences in their results (males: mean: 43.1; SD: 21.9 / females: mean: 43.8; SD: 20.7). 4

Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering (DST) (H. Zückner 2016) (Ages 18 and above) Name: Age: Sex: M / F Date: For each statement, please choose the answer that is truest for you. 1. When I stutter in front of family or friends, it does not usually lead to negative feelings. 2. I can tell a listener/listeners about my stutter or myself as a person who stutters without having any negative feelings. 3. When I stutter in front of people at my place of work/education/training (school/profession), I do not have any negative feelings. 4. I usually succeed in maintaining eye contact with the listener(s) when I stutter. 5. I feel uncomfortable when people talk to me about my stutter. 6. I feel uncomfortable when I meet other people who stutter. 7. Even when I noticeably stutter, I believe that the way I speak is acceptable for my listeners. 8. I find it difficult to accept myself as a person who stutters. 5

9. I find the thought of occasionally imitating stuttering (voluntary stuttering) in front of listeners uncomfortable. 10. Even if I feel very uncomfortable about stuttering in a certain situation, I no longer think about it shortly afterwards. 11. Stuttering does not reduce my sense of self-worth. 12. I feel more uncomfortable about my stutter in the presence of people of higher status than me (boss, teacher, foreman...) than with other people. 13. My stutter upsets me most when I talk to people that I do not find likable. 14. I do not experience any negative feelings when listeners are briefly unsettled by my stutter, such as when they avert their eyes, smile sheepishly, look astonished... 15. I feel uncomfortable when I hear the word stutter or stutterer or have to use those words myself. 16. Because of my stutter, I feel uncomfortable a long time in advance of important situations in which I have to speak. 17. Even though I risk stuttering, I talk to strangers when I need to ask for something. 6

18. I believe that my stutter only slightly impairs my life at the moment and important life decisions. 19. One or more of the following feelings occur(s) frequently in connection with my stuttering: shame / sense of inferiority / self-abasement / fear of negative assessment. 20. Frustration is a feeling that I associate very strongly with my stuttering speech. 21. A lasting increase in the frequency of my stuttering would not diminish my general quality of life. 22. I very rarely avoid situations for fear of stuttering. 23. I rarely search for other words, reorganise my sentences or break off in mid-sentence to avoid stuttering. 24. I am not happy with how I cope with my stuttering. 25. Stuttering is an experience in loss of control: You cannot control when the stutter arises, how it progresses or how long it lasts. I can experience the stuttering induced loss of control without negative feelings. 7

26. Overall, the way I see myself as a person who stutters is as self-accepting and outwardly confident as I would like it to be. 8

Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering: Scoring scheme 1. When I stutter in front of family or friends, it does not usually lead to negative feelings. 2. I can tell a listener/listeners about my stutter or myself as a person who stutters without having any negative feelings. 3. When I stutter in front of people at my place of work/education/training (school/profession), I do not have any negative feelings. 4. I usually succeed in maintaining eye contact with the listener(s) when I stutter. 5. I feel uncomfortable when people talk to me about my stutter. 6. I feel uncomfortable when I meet other people who stutter. 7. Even when I noticeably stutter, I believe that the way I speak is acceptable for my listeners. 8. I find it difficult to accept myself as a person who stutters. 9

9. I find the thought of occasionally imitating stuttering (voluntary stuttering) in front of listeners uncomfortable. 10. Even if I feel very uncomfortable about stuttering in a certain situation, I no longer think about it shortly afterwards. 11. Stuttering does not reduce my sense of self-worth. 12. I feel more uncomfortable about my stutter in the presence of people of higher status than me (boss, teacher, foreman...) than with other people. 13. My stutter upsets me most when I talk to people that I do not find likable. 14. I do not experience any negative feelings when listeners are briefly unsettled by my stutter, such as when they avert their eyes, smile sheepishly, look astonished... 15. I feel uncomfortable when I hear the word stutter or stutterer or have to use those words myself. 16. Because of my stutter, I feel uncomfortable a long time in advance of important situations in which I have to speak. 17. Even though I risk stuttering, I talk to strangers when I need to ask for something. 10

18. I believe that my stutter only slightly impairs my life at the moment and important life decisions. 19. One or more of the following feelings occur(s) frequently in connection with my stuttering: shame / sense of inferiority / self-abasement / fear of negative assessment. 20. Frustration is a feeling that I associate very strongly with my stuttering speech. 21. A lasting increase in the frequency of my stuttering would not diminish my general quality of life. 22. I very rarely avoid situations for fear of stuttering. 23. I rarely search for other words, reorganise my sentences or break off in mid-sentence to avoid stuttering. 24. I am not happy with how I cope with my stuttering. 25. Stuttering is an experience in loss of control: You cannot control when the stutter arises, how it progresses or how long it lasts. I can experience the stuttering induced loss of control without negative feelings. 11

26. Overall, the way I see myself as a person who stutters is as self-accepting and outwardly confident as I would like it to be. 12

Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering: Evaluation sheet Name: Age: Date: Evaluator : Enter the scores for the various items in the subscale table. Item Subscale 1 Emotional experience (15) 1 Emotions 2 Emotions 3 Emotions 4 Behaviour 5 Emotions 6 Emotions 7 Emotions 8 Higher-order areas 9 Emotions 10 Behaviour 11 Higher-order areas 12 Emotions 13 Emotions 14 Emotions 15 Emotions 16 Emotions 17 Behaviour 18 Higher-order areas 19 Emotions 20 Emotions 21 Higher-order areas 22 Behaviour 23 Behaviour 24 Higher-order areas 25 Emotions 26 Higher-order areas Sum of raw values Percentage Subscale 2 Behaviour (5) Subscale 3 Higher-order areas of life (6) Total score (26) Degree of Score 1 (Emotions) Score 2 (Behaviour) Score 3 (Higherorder areas) Total score 13

Raw values, percentile and degree of Raw values, percentile and degree of : Total DST score Total overall DST score Percentile Degree of 0-10 1-4 very good 11-15 5-11 very good to good 16-24 12-23 good 25-36 24-40 good to moderate 37-50 41-60 moderate 51-62 61-77 moderate to poor 63-70 78-88 poor 71-76 89-95 poor to very poor 77-104 96-100 very poor Raw values, percentile and degree of DST subscale Emotional experience Total score for Emotional experience Percentile Degree of 0-9 1-11 very good 10-21 12-40 good 22-36 41-77 moderate 37-45 78-95 poor 46-60 96-100 very poor Raw values, percentile and degree of DST subscale Behaviour Total score for Behaviour Percentile Degree of 0-2 1-11 very good 3-6 12-40 good 7-11 41-77 moderate 12-14 78-95 poor 15-20 96-100 very poor Raw values, percentile and degree of DST subscale Influence of stuttering on higher-order areas of life Total score for Higher-order areas of life Percentile Degree of 0-2 1-11 very good 3-8 12-40 good 9-15 41-77 moderate 16-21 78-95 poor 22-24 96-100 very poor 14

Results of the Desensitization Questionnaire Stuttering (DST) (H.Zückner 2016) Name: Age: Date: Therapist / Institution: This questionnaire measures the extent to which a person who stutters is desensitized to his stutter and to reactions from listeners. The degree of, high or low, is measured in three areas covered by items in the questionnaire: 1. How strong is the emotional stress due to stuttering (e.g. when stuttering in front of people whom one does not like)? 2. Which behaviour patterns indicate the degree of (e.g. reorganizing sentences or thinking of alternative words in order to avoid stuttering)? 3. What effect does stuttering have on higher-order areas of life (e.g. self-worth, quality of life, etc.)? An overall value is calculated from all three areas. The total numerical value obtained in this way permits classification in one of nine degree categories. For the three subscales, the result is classified in five degree categories. Your results are marked with a circle. Total result for degree of very good good to very good good good to moderate moderate moderate to poor poor poor to very poor very poor Total score: points on a scale of 0 to 104 (0 = very good 104 = very poor ). The subscales for the degree of yielded the following classification: Assessment of the emotional stress due to stuttering very good good moderate Assessment of behaviour (in connection with stuttering) very good good moderate poor poor very poor very poor Assessment of effect of stuttering on higher-order areas of life very good good moderate poor very poor 15

References Zückner H. (2017). Desensibilisierungsfragebogen Stottern (DST), Forum Logopädie, 31 (2), 6-11 http://www.desensibilisierungsfragebogen-stottern.de/ http://www. -questionnaire-stuttering.net 16