The long term risk for CIN3+ in HC2 negative women and in HC2 positive women with a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN1 or less

Similar documents
IJC International Journal of Cancer

Punch biopsies shorten time to clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus infections of the uterine cervix

Appropriate Use of Cytology and HPV Testing in the New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines

Case Based Problems. Recommended Guidelines. Workshop: Case Management of Abnormal Pap Smears and Colposcopies. Disclosure

Over-diagnoses in Cytopathology: Is histology the gold standard?

CINtec PLUS and the Pap smear: a co-testing alternative

EFC and European Standards for Colposcopic Evaluation

Colposcopy. Attila L Major, MD, PhD

Gynecologic Oncology

ASCCP 2013 Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests

Evidence-based treatment of a positive HPV DNA test. Th. Agorastos Prof. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Aristotle University Thessaloniki/GR

Details of HPV-based Cervical Cancer Screening in Turkey

Management Algorithms for Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Colposcopy

SESSION J4. What's Next? Managing Abnormal PAPs in 2014

6 th EFC Satellite meeting, Saturday 1 st December 2018

Implementation of a Research-Robust Colposcopy Management Program within the Electronic Medical Record System

An Update on Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations and on the DOH BCC Program

Cervical Cancer Screening. David Quinlan December 2013

Recommandations SSGO dépistage cancer du col utérin. Pr Patrick Petignat University Hospitals of Geneva

Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Histology

Updated ASCCP Consensus Guidelines For Managing Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Precursors Michael A. Gold, M.D.

HPV TESTING AND THE RENEWAL PROGRAMME. Deborah Neesham Gynaecological Oncologist RWH

Screening for the Precursors of Cervical Cancer in the Era of HPV Vaccination. Dr Stella Heley Senior Liaison Physician Victorian Cytology Service

No Disclosures. Updated Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Management of Abnormal Results. Objectives 5/9/2016

Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Update

Partha Basu M.D. Screening Group/ Early Detection & Prevention Section

Clinical Guidance: Recommended Best Practices for Delivery of Colposcopy Services in Ontario Best Practice Pathway Summary

Faculty Pap Smear Guidelines: Family Planning Update 2008 Part Two

P16 et Ki67 Biomarkers: new tool for risk management and low grade intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL): be ready for the future.

Cervical Cancer 4/27/2016

HPV Molecular Diagnostics and Cervical Cytology. Philip E. Castle, PhD, MPH American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) March 15, 2012

Relevance of HPV Screening for Triaging Equivocal Cytology Findings in the Pap II p, Pap III and Pap IIID Groups Results of Two Long-Term Studies

HPV and Cervical Cancer, Screening and Prevention. John Ragsdale, MD July 12, 2018 CME Lecture Series

Update on Cervical Cancer Screening. Rahmouna Farez M.D. Assistant Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin 5/2/2014

Update on Cervical Cancer Screening

Making Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening

Cuid d Fheidhmeannacht na Seirbhíse Sláinte. Part of the Health Service Executive. CS/PR/PM-20 Rev 2 ISBN Programme Report 2014/2015

The routine use of ZedScan within one colposcopy service in England. MC Macdonald, R Lyon, JE Palmer, JA Tidy

Risk of invasive cancer after colposcopy with and without biopsy

Becoming a colposcopist: Colposcope case studies

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

Cervical Cancer Prevention in the 21 st Century Changing Paradigms

Abnormal Spectroscopy Scans May Presage Persistent or Progressive Cervical Dysplasia

Cervical Cancer Screening Update. Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health

Cervical Cancer Screening

Molecular Triage: Partial and Extended Genotyping and More!

QA and Quality Indicators for Cervical Cancer Screening Programs. Guglielmo Ronco MD Senior Epidemiologist CPO Piemonte Turin, Italy

Clinical outcomes after conservative management of CIN1/2, CIN2, and CIN2/3 in women ages years

Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Case. How would you manage this woman?

EVIDENCE REPORT. Ass.-Prof. Dr. Gaby Sroczynski, M.P.H., Univ.-Prof. Dr. Uwe Siebert, M.P.H., M.Sc.

Cervical Cancer Screening

Lessons From Cases of Screened Women Who Developed Cervical Carcinoma

Cervical Conization. 1

Risk : How does it define cervical cancer screening?

Management that provides continuity of care for women

I have no financial interests to disclose.

Natural History of HPV Infections 15/06/2015. Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma

Screening for Cervical Cancer. Grand Rounds 1/16/13 Meggan Linck

Cervical Cancer Screening for the Primary Care Physician for Average Risk Individuals Clinical Practice Guidelines. June 2013

Cytology/Biopsy/Leep Gynecologic Correlation: Practical Considerations and Approaches.

Cervical Testing and Results Management. An Evidenced-Based Approach April 22nd, Debora Bear, MSN, MPH

European Union survey on organization and quality control of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination programs

BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results. February 2018

Cryotherapy has No Place in Colposcopy Practice

The new European (and Italian) guidelines for cervical screening will recommend PAP from 25 to 34 HPV (+ triage) from 35 to 64

Eradicating Mortality from Cervical Cancer

News. Laboratory NEW GUIDELINES DEMONSTRATE GREATER ROLE FOR HPV TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING TIMOTHY UPHOFF, PHD, DABMG, MLS (ASCP) CM

The society for lower genital tract disorders since 1964.

!"#$%&'(#)*$+&,$-&.#,$/#0()1-$ ),1')$2(%&,2#,%$%(0'#$34567$

HPV Primary Screening in the United States

BRITISH COLUMBIA S CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM

The implications of HPV immunisation on cervical screening

Screening for Cervical Cancer: Demystifying the Guidelines DR. NEERJA SHARMA

Recent Changes in Cervical Cancer Screening in Canada

How to combine screening and vaccination How to promote women s health and prevent cancer with good screening strategies

Your Colposcopy Visit

Samuel B. Wolf, D.O., F.A.C.O.G. Emerald Coast Obstetrics and Gynecology Panama City Florida

Colposcopy Standards Working Group 2: Risk-based colposcopy

NATIONAL CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME Monitor 2017

SOGC / SCC Clinical Practice Guideline

Woo Dae Kang, Ho Sun Choi, Seok Mo Kim

ASCCP Guideline Changes and Management of the Abnormal Pap Test Accurately Targeting Intervention

Goals. In the News. Primary HPV Screening 3/9/2015. Your PAP and HPV Update Primary HPV Testing- Screening Intervals- HPV Vaccine Updates-

Preventing cervical cancer Australia. The Renewed National Cervical Screening Program 2019 Common Questions and Cases

WOMEN S INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY LABORATORY - PELVIC EXAM STUDIES COLPOSCOPY RESULTS FORM L14

LABORATORY - PELVIC EXAM STUDIES COLPOSCOPY RESULTS FORM L14

Pushing the Boundaries of the Lab Diagnosis in Asia

Usefulness of p16/ki67 Immunostaining in the Triage of Women Referred to Colposcopy

GLANDULAR LESIONS PITFALLS IN MANAGEMENT. Dr Li Wai Hon HKSCCP The 15 th Anniversary Symposium 10 December 2016

Proposed new national cervical screening program. Dr Elizabeth Jackson Obstetrician Gynaecologist Cairns

HPV-Negative Results in Women Developing Cervical Cancer: Implications for Cervical Screening Options

Cervical cytology or the molecular model: which is the best way forward?

How invasive cervical cancer audit affects clinical practice

Cervical Screening for Dysplasia and Cancer in Patients with HIV

Human Papillomavirus. Kathryn Thiessen, ARNP, ACRN The Kansas AIDS Education and Training Center The University of Kansas School of Medicine Wichita

Validity of Colposcopy in the Diagnosis of Early Cervical Neoplasia. Dr. Olaniyan Olayinka Babafemi

The role of human papillomavirus testing in the management of women with low-grade abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial

Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Anita L. Nelson, MD. Principles Underlying Screening Recommendations. Learning Objectives

Managament of Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Histology

Cervical Screening Results Leading to Detection of Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Uterine Cervix

Transcription:

The long term risk for CIN3+ in HC2 negative women and in HC2 positive women with a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN1 or less - 6 years follow-up from an HPV-screening program in Wolfsburg, Germany Klinikum Wolfsburg Dies ist der Titel der Präsentation, die Eingabe erfolgt über den Folienmaster 06.03.2012 1 Dr. med. Alexander Luyten Oberarzt Frauenklinik Chefarzt Prof. Dr. KU Petry

QIAGEN would like to thank our speaker, Dr. Alexander Luyten, for his presentation. Disclaimer: QIAGEN is not affiliated with the Frauenklinik Wolfsburg. The views expressed herein are those of the speaker, and do not necessarily express the views of QIAGEN. For up-to-date licensing information and product-specific disclaimers for QIAGEN products, see the respective QIAGEN kit handbook or user manual. QIAGEN kit handbooks and user manuals are available at www.qiagen.com or can be requested from QIAGEN Technical Services or your local distributor.

Chances of primary HPV screening HPV testing defines the population at risk, there is almost no risk for CIN3+ in HPV negative women for 5 to 7 years Arbyn M, Vaccine 2012 High quality colposcopy should detect CIN2+ and prevent cervical cancer. The subsequent risk of CIN3+ in women with normal colposcopy should be low Rodriguez AC, JNCI 2008 Combining HPV testing and colposcopy as a one-time intervention should clear the screened population from CIN3+ with a low risk of subsequent lesions for many years 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 2

Challenges: Is colposcopy in HPV screening programs more difficult? 1. The failure rate of Colposcopy may increase because of: Adenocarcinoma in situ will be associated with HC2-positive results but may be missed by cytology and colposcopy The low rate of CIN3+ among HPV+/cyto normal women may distract the colposcopist s attention (screening colposcopy effect?) Persisting HPV infections have an increased risk of progression to CIN3+. Therefore the risk of new lesions following a normal colposcopy should be increased in HPV screening compared to cytology screening with ASC-US or LSIL that may be explained by transient HPV infections or are even HPV negative 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 3

Challenges: Is colposcopy in HPV screening programs more difficult? 2. Patient compliance with colposcopy in HPV+/Pap normal women may be poor 3. Risk of overtreatment in HPV+/Pap normal women. More unnecessary treatments in CIN2 that may have regressed spontaneously 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 4

Long term risk stratification with primary HPV- and cytology co-testing Dillner J et al, BMJ 2008 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 5

Metaanalysis Which HPV Test can be used for screening? M. Arbyn, Vaccine 2012 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 6 043

WOLPHSCREEN = Wolfsburg Primary HPV Screening Pilot Project Women 30+ yrs, health insurance at Deutsche BKK Cytology + HPV-Test (HC2) Cytology negative HC2 negative Cytology positive HC2 negative HC2 positive Cytology negative HC2 positive Cytology positive Next Routine Screening after 5 yrs Repeat Cytology In 6 months Repeat Cytology 6 Mon and HPV-Test 12 Mon Transfer for colposcopy negative positive 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 7

WOLPHSCREEN 2006-2011 Private OBGYN: Participants N= 19,625 H P V -T e s t C y t o lo g y H P V -H R n e g P a p n e g H P V -H R n e g P a p p o s H P V -H R p o s P a p n e g H P V -H R p o s P a p p o s R o u t in e 5 y e a rs A S C -U S / L S IL O b s e rv a t io n H S I L c o lp o R e p e a t T e s t s C o lp o s c o p y 92.4% 1.3% 5.3% 1.0% 0.00005 % 0 % 8.9 % 41 % RISK OF CIN 3+ 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 8

Quality control Central management of all project related data Invitation letters to non participants after 2 years Information letters to non attenders with a delay of 6+ months according to patient pathway Repeated searches for externally diagnosed CIN3+ cases in the regional tumor registry and Deutsche BKK s database 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 9

Compliance with colposcopy 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 10

Participants in colpo clinic between 2006-12 (=3.9%) n=712 Compliance 93,1% 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 11 045

CIN3+ according to Pap smear results 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 12

Cervical Cancer Incidence in Lower Saxony 2009 original tumour registry data 2012 Wolfsburg 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 13

Overtreatment? 1,49% excisional therapy within 60 months Quality indicator fulfilled: 90.8% CIN2+ n= 273 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 14

Colposcopy failure in detection of CIN3+ Definition colposcopy failure Definite failure: Occurence of CIN3 or cancer (CIN3+) within 15 months following a colposcopy classified as CIN1 or less Most likely failure: Occurence of ACIS or CIN3+ in type3 transformation zones more than 15 months following a colposcopy classification of CIN1 or less New lesion : Occurence of a new lesion on colposcopy, CIN3 on histology in type 1 or 2 transformation zones, more than 15 months after a normal colposcopy (CIN1 or less) Petry, KU, Gyn Oncol, 128: 282 (2013) 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 15

WOLPHSCREEN 5 principles for colposcopy 1. Punch biopsies of minor and major changes in type 1 or 2 TZ 2. Endocervical curettage of type 3 TZ 3. Excisional treatment of any CIN3+ and of CIN2 with endocervical involvement 4. Excisional treatment of any HSIL+ cytology in type 3 TZ 5. Excisional treatment of any major changes in type 3 TZ Petry, KU, Gyn Oncol, 128: 282 (2013) 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 16

Observed Colposcopy Failures Overall failure rate = 8 out of 171 = 4.7% Petry, KU, Gyn Oncol, 128: 282 (2013) 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 17

Failure rate and screening results HC2 pos / Pap abnormal HC2 pos / Pap normal n= 76 n=95 correct failure correct failure Petry, KU, Gyn Oncol, 128: 282 (2013) 0% P= 0.021 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 18 8.4 %

Failure analysis No failure in cancer cases 5 failures in ECC / type 3 TZ 3 failures punch biopsies 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 19

% Long term risks in women with </=CIN1 on colposcopy (n=460) 8 7 6 5 4 3 CIN3 CIN2+ 2 1 0 overall risk true risk of new lesion 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 20 (n=460)

% Second HPV Screening after 5 years few HPV infections, no disease n= 19.625 (2006-2011 and 4.067 women 2011-2012 in Wolfsburg) 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 21

HPV incidence and persistency after 5-6 years Inc idenc e P ers is tenc y S till HC 2 pos S till HP V neg HP V pos HC 2 neg without surgery HC 2 neg after treatment n= 3906, 2006 HC2 neg n= 160, 2006 HC2 pos 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 22

Long term Risk for CIN3+ 2006-13 % * * Risk groups 2006/2007 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 23

Long term risk for CIN3+ during follow-up 2006-13 n 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 24

WOLPHSCREEN = Wolfsburg Primary HPV Screening Pilot Project Women 30+ yrs, health insurance at Deutsche BKK Cytology + HPV-Test (HC2) Cytology negative HC2 negative Cytology positive HC2 negative HC2 positive Cytology negative HC2 positive Cytology positive Next Routine Screening after 5 yrs Repeat Cytology In 6 months Repeat Cytology 6 Mon and HPV-Test 12 Mon Transfer for colposcopy negative positive 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 25

2. Round Feb 2011 Jul 2012 0 % 94.9% HPV-/Pap- 4,112 participants Risk of underlying CIN3+ 1st 0.87 2nd 0.05 0.9% 3.3% 0.2% HPV-/Pap+ HPV+/Pap- HPV+/Pap+ 0 % 0.7% 14% 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 26

Conclusion HC2-Screening and colposcopy in an organized program with sufficient quality control reduced significantly the burden of CIN3+ HPV negative defines a long term zero risk for CIN3+ while a colpo diagnosis of </= CIN1 had a very low risk for CIN3+ during long term follow-up Our results fit in a concept that most CIN3 lesions develop before age 30 For colposcopy HPV screening offers specific challenges that are by far outweighed by the breathtaking reduction in cervical disease 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 27

Thank you for attention Klinikum Wolfsburg K. Ulrich Petry Katrin Luyten Aileen Laksana Sarah Scherbring Antonella Sogari Bernd Braun Axel Reinecke-Lüthge Deutsche BKK Wolfsburg Stefan Lorenz Claudia Mauritz 34 niedergelassene Gynäkologen Externe Partner Universität Tübingen Thomas Iftner Barbara Holz Angelika Iftner QIAGEN (HC2) P16/Ki67 Dietmar Schmidt, Mannheim Rüdiger Ridder, Heidelberg Robert Koch Institut (RKI) Nina Buttmann 7th Diagnostic Days 27.Nov.2013 28