What is Marihuana? Physical Effects 3/4/2009

Similar documents
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

OREGON MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT

Diane E. Hoffmann, J.D., M.S. University of Maryland School of Law

Seeing through the Smoke: Preparing Your Workplace for Legalized Marijuana. October 23, 2018

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 14, SECTION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DEARBORN, ENTITLED "MARIJUANA"

Maine s Medical Marijuana Law. 40 th Annual ASMAC Fall Conference Ritz Carlton Lake Tahoe October 26, 2014

Insight. Marijuana Legalization Efforts Enjoy Success, Demonstrating Major Shift in Approach to Drug Regulation and Use NOVEMBER 9, 2016

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 964 SUMMARY

MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIJUANA REGULATION: From Home Remedy to Criminalization. to State Regulated Industry. March 22, Stephen K.

Smoke and Mirrors: Navigating Medical Marijuana in the Workplace

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,

ARIZONA MEDICAL MARIJUANA PROGRAM. Tina Wesoloskie, MPA Office of Medical Marijuana Card Registry Arizona Department of Health Services

To the Reader. Mahalo. Second Edition

MEDICAL MARIJUANA USE

MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

Senator Mark B. Madsen proposes the following substitute bill:

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HJR

Understanding Maine s Medical Marijuana Law

LEGAL ASPECTS of MEDICAL MARIJUANA Florida Nurse Practitioner Network Annual Conference September 17, 2018

This Chapter shall be known as the Marijuana Use and Regulation Ordinance for the City of Palm Desert.

Compassionate Medical Cannabis: What It Means to the Street Officer

ORDINANCE NO

Policy / Drug and Alcohol-Free Workshops

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 3460

ORDINANCE NO

DIRECTIVE January 13, 2010 D Revision DP&P Narcotics Medical Marijuana

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

I MINA' TRENTI DOS NA LIHESLATURAN GUAHAN 2013 (FIRST) Regular Session

#70 Final (paragraph lettering corrected by the Elections Division on 4/4/12 as requested by the Title Board)

TEXAS COMPASSIONATE-USE ACT

Overview of Cannabis Laws

Drug Evaluation. and Classification in Nova Scotia AND THE IMPACT OF THE LEGALIZATION OF CANNABIS. Item No

ORDINANCE NO

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2263

Work Session VIII: Legalized Marijuana. Douglas J. Friednash City Attorney Denver, Colorado

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

128th MAINE LEGISLATURE

MARIJUANA POLICY PROGRAM COMMUNITY TOWN HALL

ORDINANCE NO. Sumas Ordinance No. Prohibiting Marijuana Businesses (Draft )

Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Refresher

Thomas Reagan. Law Enforcement Liaison Maine Bureau of Highway Safety Retired DRE

State of Minnesota HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Recreational Marijuana Town of Mammoth Lakes Proposed implementation of Prop 64 April 26, 2017

DRAFT Medical Marijuana Zoning Ordinance For City Planning Commission 10/17/17 October 11, [Additions underlined, deletions in strikeout.

Attachment 1 ORDINANCE 562

Question 2 made some recreational marijuana legal under Nevada state law.

SONOMA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CHIEFS ASSOCIATION

Marijuana - Decriminalization 1 : 2015 Legislative Session Bill Status Update

CAREGIVER COMPLIANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM VOLUME 1

Whereas, the prevention of the illegal sale and use of marijuana, particularly involving youth is a public health priority; and

Drug Impaired Driving Update. Chuck Hayes International Association of Chiefs of Police

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2270

Please note that this draft is incomplete and likely to change before and/or after City Planning Commission review.

Frequently Asked Questions

ASA Model Legislation (updated July 2014)


Shelburne Board of Health Proposed Regulations to be considered at a public hearing on June 19, 2018

Medical Cannabis Program. Dr. Maureen Small Co Medical Director Andrea Sundberg Program Coordinator

HR UP IN SMOKE: THE INTERSECTION BETWEEN MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION AND EMPLOYMENT LAW. Michigan Municipal League

What about off-duty marijuana consumption? Taxes & revenue Will cities get any revenue from the sale of marijuana?

WHEREAS, the Board desires to provide regulations pertaining to the location, land use, appearance, and signage of medical marijuana uses; and

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS POLICY AND MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CONTACT INFORMATION WHY DO WE CARE?

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM.

Research Protocol for Medical Marijuana Dispensaries. Prepared by Legal Science, LLC

2011 Jackson Lewis LLP. Prop 203 Passes by Thread

OC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT

ENROLLED 2014 Legislature CS for CS for SB 1030, 1st Engrossed

Community Meeting: Local Cannabis Policy in Oroville

Circuit Court of Cook County Domestic Relations Division MEMORANDUM

3005 Substance Abuse and Tobacco Control. 1. Scope

B. To protect, in particular, the health of vulnerable populations including children and those with chronic health conditions; and

HOUSE BILL NO Representatives P. Anderson, Glassheim, Hawken, Maragos, M. Nelson, Schneider, Strinden

Prop 203 Passes by Thread

Medical Marijuana Update

Policy \ \ Medical (Palliative) Use of Marijuana

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, the twentieth day of April, two thousand and eighteen. JOINT RESOLUTION

Adopted May 3, 2011 by Apache County Board of Supervisors Draft for P & Z Commission December 2015

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL th Legislature 2007 Regular Session

ORDINANCE NO

Drug-Free Zones. A Presentation to Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice. Claire K. Mazur.

Medical Cannabis Comes to Maryland: What Finance Professionals Need to Know About this Budding Industry

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1030

ORDINANCE NO

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL AN ACT

Industrial Hemp. What is industrial hemp? Is industrial hemp the same as marihuana? Why has hemp been illegal to cultivate in Canada in the past?

TOWN OF KENNEBUNK MORATORIUM ORDINANCE ON RETAIL MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENTS AND RETAIL MARIJUANA SOCIAL CLUBS

DRAFT ONLY. Name (signature) Date Street Address ZIP Printed Name

Medical Cannabis Ordinances. Tuesday, December 20, 2016

REGULATION TO ENSURE THE SANITARY AND SAFE OPERATION OF ADULT-USE MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENTS AND THE SALE OF ADULT-USE MARIJUANA

STAFF REPORT City of Lancaster NB 2

ORDINANCE NO SECTION 1. The Board of Supervisors makes the following findings in support of this ordinance:

Chapter CANNABIS* Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1015 SUMMARY

Marijuana: Comparison of State Laws Allowing Use for Medicinal Purposes

Medical marijuana vs. workplace policy

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Recommendation

PC RESOLUTION NO XX

Transcription:

Michigan s Medical Marihuana Act Presented by: Kenneth Stecker PAAM 2/24/09 Michigan s Medical Marihuana Act What is Marihuana? It is a psychoactive drug extracted from the plant Cannabis sativa. The herbal form of drug consists of dried mature flowers and leaves of female plants. The resinous is known as hashish. The biological active ingredient is THC. Physical Effects THC enters the body through the lungs; Smoke is inhaled and held in the lungs; Smoking inhalation, intoxication effect within minutes; Smoked THC effect is for 3 4 hours, longer if ingested orally. 1

Legal History of Marihuana 1800s-Legal in most states, used as hemp to make items such as rope, and used for medicinal purposes; 1910-After the Mexican revolution, a wave of Hispanics immigrated to the U.S. and introduced the American public to recreational use; 1930-The Federal Bureau of Narcotics was formed to scrutinize the use of Marihuana and other drugs. Legal History of Marihuana Mid-1930s-Marihuana was regulated in every state through the Uniform State Narcotics Act; 1937-Marihuana Tax Act made possession or transfer of the drug illegal throughout the U.S. under federal law, excluding medical and industrial uses, in which an expensive excise tax was required; 1950s-Strict mandatory sentencing laws, substantial federal penalties for possession, but was removed in the 1970 s. Legal History of Marihuana 1970-Federal Controlled Substances Act was enacted and it classified Marihuana as a Schedule 1 drug; 1973-The Drug Enforcement Agency was created; 1986-The Anti-Drug Abuse Act reinstated mandatory prison terms; 1996-California voters legalized medical Marihuana. 2

Epidemiology By 2006, more than 12 million Americans (about 5% of the population) were using Marihuana on a monthly basis (average of 18.7 joints). Over 110,000 visits to an emergency room listed Marihuana as a contributing factor. 39% of adult male arrestees and 26% of adult female arrestees tested positive for Marihuana, as did 53% of the juvenile male and 38% of the juvenile female arrestees. Street Price $6 a gram in 1981; $18 a gram in 1991; $10 a gram present; An ounce ranges from $100-$400 in the U.S.; $700-$2,000 in the Midwest; Cocoa puff -cocaine and Marihuana; Frios - Marihuana laced with PCP; Fuel -Marihuana laced with insecticides; Geek -crack and Marihuana. Marihuana and Driving Marihuana appears in urine and blood 3-5 times more frequently in fatal driving crashes than in the general population. 60% failed field sobriety test 2 ½ hours after moderate smoking. 2 joints smoked (10 minutes apart with 1.8-3.6% THC) failed sobriety tests 20 minutes later. 3

Michigan s Medical Marihuana Act-Overview Effective-December 4, 2008 Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) will have 120 days after December 4, 2008, to adopt rules to implement the Act. If MDCH fails to adopt rules within 120 days, a qualifying patient may commence an action in the circuit court for the county of Ingham to compel MDCH to perform the actions pursuant to the Act. Qualifying Patient A person who has been diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating medical condition. Debilitating Medical Condition Cancer Glaucoma HIV AIDS Severe nausea Etc. 4

Written Certification A document signed by a physician, stating the patient s debilitating medical condition and that in his/her professional opinion, the patient is likely to therapeutically benefit from the medical use of Marihuana. Medical Use The acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, internal possession, delivery, transfer, or transportation or paraphernalia relating to the administration of Marihuana to treat or alleviate a registered qualifying patient s debilitating condition or symptoms. Enclosed, locked facility A closet, room, or other enclosed area equipped with locks or other security devices that permit access only by a registered primary caregiver or registered qualifying patient. 5

Primary Caregiver An individual at least 21 years of age who has agreed to assist with a patient s medical use of Marihuana and who has never been convicted of a felony involving illegal drugs. Usable Marihuana The dried leaves and flowers of the Marihuana plant, and any mixture or preparation thereof, but does not include the seeds, stalk, and roots of the plant. Physician The Act permits a physician to issue a written certification to the patient. A physician would not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or penalty, including civil penalties and disciplinary actions for providing a written certification to the patient. 6

Possession, Cultivation, and Plant Limits Qualifying Patient- Up to 2.5 ounces of Marihuana and 12 Marihuana plants in an enclosed, locked facility. Primary Caregiver-Up to 2.5 ounces, and if primary caregiver is specified by qualifying patient, then allowed to cultivate up to 12 Marihuana plants, kept in an enclosed, locked facility. Not Subject to Arrest These registered individuals shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or civil penalty or disciplinary action by a business or professional licensing board or bureau, for the medical use of Marihuana. Designation The patient could designate a caregiver, and would have to indicate whether the patient or the caregiver would be allowed to possess Marihuana for the patient s medical use. Each patient could only have one caregiver and each caregiver could assist no more than five patients. 7

Visiting Qualifying Patients A card issued elsewhere in the United States would have the same force and effect as a card issued by the MDCH. A visiting qualifying patient refers to a patient who is not a Michigan resident or who had been a Michigan resident for less than 30 days. Identification Card System The Act requires MDCH to establish an identification card system for patients qualified to use Marihuana and individuals qualified to be primary caregivers. Administration The qualifying patients would have to submit a written certification from a physician and an application or renewal fee, along with other specific information to the MDCH. MDCH shall verify the information submitted and either approve or deny an application within 15 days after receiving i it. If MDCH should approve the application, MDCH would issue a registry identification card. A registry identification card means a document issued by MDCH that identifies a person as a registered qualifying patients or registered primary caregiver. 8

Under the Age of 18 MDCH could not issue a registry card to a patient under the age of 18 years of age unless three criteria are met: 1. Explained the potential risks and benefits to the patient and a parent or guardian 2. Written certification from two physicians; 3. Parent or guardian consents in writing. Confidentiality of the Card MDCH would keep a confidential list of the individuals to whom it has issued a card. The names and other identifying information on the list would be confidential and exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. In the Presence or Vicinity A person shall not be subject to arrest or prosecution, solely for being in the presence or vicinity of the medical use of marihuana, or for assisting a registered qualifying patient. 9

No Probable Cause The possession or application for a registry identification card would not constitute probable cause or reasonable suspicion and could not be used to support the search of the person or property of an individual who possesses or applies for a card, or otherwise subject the person to inspection by local, county, or state governmental agencies. What is Prohibited Under the Act? Possessing Marihuana, or otherwise engaging in the medical use of Marihuana: in a school bus, on the grounds of any preschool or primary secondary school; or in any correctional facility. Smoking Marihuana on any form of public transportation, or in any public place. Operating, navigating, or being in actual physical control of any motor vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat while under the influence of Marihuana. Operation of a Motor Vehicle Although the Act prohibits the operation of any motor vehicle while under the influence of Marihuana; it does not make reference to Michigan s current OUID Per Se Law. 10

Public Place Although the act prohibits smoking Marihuana in public places, it does not define what would constitute a public place. Affirmative Defenses It allows for the assertion of an affirmative defense, even for unregistered patients and caregivers. The defense would be presumed valid where the evidence showed that t the 3 elements were established. Pursuant to a motion to dismiss, the charges shall be dismissed if the 3 elements were established. How Patients Acquire Marihuana? Although the Act allows for the assertion of an affirmative defense (even for unregistered patients and caregivers) for the acquisition, possession, cultivation, use, delivery, transfer, or transportation of Marihuana or paraphernalia for medical use, it does not specify how patients and caregivers would acquire Marihuana for medical purposes. 11

Law Enforcement A qualifying patient and caregiver could face felony penalties of imprisonment for up to two years and/or fine of not more than $2,000.00 and revocation of his/her ID card for selling Marihuana to someone who is not allowed to use Marihuana. The Act would impose a $500.00 fine for fraudulent representation of any fact or circumstance relating to the medical use of Marihuana to avoid prosecution. MDCH s Proposed Rules Public Hearing was held on January 5, 2009 in Lansing, and the proposed rules were just released on February 23, 2009; Certain members of the public questioned the proposed rules, such as; requiring patients and caregivers to keep an inventory of their Marihuana, and prohibiting Marihuana to be smoked in public view, while on private property. MSP questioned a proposed rule that would require leftover Marihuana to be taken control by law enforcement agencies. Concerns About the Act Potential conflict with MCLA 257.625(8); Does not specify how patients and caregivers would acquire Marihuana for medical purposes; The affirmative defense section applies to patients rather than just to qualifying patients. 12

Controlled Substances SCHEDULE ONE: If any amount of a schedule one controlled substance (e.g. Marihuana) or cocaine in body, need not prove that suspect was under the influence or impaired. MCL 257.625(8). If not schedule one or cocaine, must prove operating under the influence or impaired. MCL 257.625(1). Nevada Supreme Court Decision State v. George Lynard- The Nevada Supreme Court ruled a doctor s letter recommending medical Marihuana is no defense in a a DUI case. The Supreme Court held there is no language in Nevada law which allows drivers who have a valid identification card to drive under the influence. Michigan vs. Federal Law Marihuana is illegal under Michigan and federal laws (Schedule 1 drug); Medical Marihuana under Michigan law is legal, but it will have no effect on federal law related to the use, possession, and delivery of Marihuana; Federal law preempts Michigan law meaning that federal agents can arrest and prosecute medical Marihuana patients and caregivers. 13

Federal Court Decisions In United States v. Oakland Buyers Cooperative, 532 U.S. 483 (2001), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the medical necessity defense was not a valid defense against a federal charge. In Conant v. Walters, 309 F.3d 629 (2002), the 9 th Circuit provided physicians with limited protection from federal prosecution. In Gonzalez v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate local activities, such as cultivating and possessing medical Marihuana, that can have an effect on interstate commerce. Future Concerns Profiteering of Marihuana; Regulating/prohibiting medical Marihuana dispensaries through ordinances; Exposure to federal prosecution; Medical Marihuana in the jail; Defendant on probation/parole School zones; Work-place. Other Medical Marihuana States Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington The earliest state law was enacted in 1996 in California, the most recent in Michigan in 2008. 14

Profiteering in Marihuana What Can You Do Now? Familiarize yourself with MDCH s rules once the rules take effect. Meet with your other law enforcement officers to educate them on the law. Educate your community. ADVANCED ROADSIDE IMPAIRED DRIVING ENFORCEMENT (ARIDE) Program was developed by NHTSA with input from the IACP. It was created to address the gap in training between the Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) and the Drug Evaluation Classification (DEC) Program. It provides officers with the opportunity to develop advanced skills and knowledge that will assist them in identifying alcohol and drug impaired drivers. 15

Difference Between DECP and ARIDE DREs: 72 Hrs classroom Field certifications Comprehensive final knowledge examination Maintain certification through continuing education ARIDE: 16 Hrs classroom Focus on SFST proficiency Broad knowledge of drug impairment indicators Introduction to drug identification matrix Relationship Between NHTSA Impaired Driving Programs Drug Evaluation & Classification Program Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement Standardized Field Sobriety Testing How Long is the Course? ARIDE is a 16-hour training course and is usually taught by a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE). The course is divided into 8 sessions, and occupies 2 consecutive training days. Formal presentations and lectures occupy the majority of the course. Most of the remainder of the course is devoted to demonstrations and hands on practice. A final exam requires students to participate in scenario interpretation exercises and identify the category of drugs responsible for the evidence described. 16

Course Objectives Properly administer & articulate the SFSTs; Describe the relationship of drugs to impaired driving incidents; Observe, identify and articulate the observable signs of drug impairment; Recognize medical conditions which may mimic signs of impairment. Drugs in Human Body Basic purpose and functions of selected major systems in the human body Methods of ingestion and general effects of drugs Medical conditions which may mimic alcohol and/or drug impairment 7 major drug categories Legal Issues Reasonable Suspicion To Stop To Administer Field Sobriety Tests Proper Administration of the SFSTs Substantial Compliance Probable Cause for Arrest Roadside Questioning/Miranda Sufficiency of Evidence to Prove Elements of the Offense 17

GOALS OF ARIDE Able to determine if an individual is under the influence of a drug or drugs other than alcohol, or the combined influence and other drugs, or suffering from some injury or illness that produces similar signs to alcohol/drug impairment. Identify the broad category or categories of drugs inducing the observable signs and symptoms of impairment. Why ARIDE? Better identification of drugged drivers Better arrests Better prosecutions Better prosecutions Saved lives 18

Ken Stecker Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan 116 West Ottawa Lansing MI 48913 (517) 334-6060 x 827 SteckerK@Michigan.gov g 19