Cost per Responder of Apremilast Versus Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Similar documents
Economic Evaluation of Apremilast in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in the United States

DLQI (ESTEEM

Effect of Apremilast on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the ESTEEM 1 Trial

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:

UC Davis Dermatology Online Journal

Kenneth Gordon, 1 Kim A. Papp, 2 Kara Creamer Rice, 3 Mona Trivedi, 3 David H. Collier, 3 Greg Kricorian 3

Treatment Changes in PaMents with Moderate-to- Severe Psoriasis: A RetrospecMve Chart Review

Bruce Strober 1, 2, Chitra Karki 3, Marc Mason 3, Ning Guo 3, Jeffrey D Greenberg 3,4, Mark Lebwohl 5

Optimizing Topical Therapy In Atopic Dermatitis

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis (UNVEIL Phase IV Study)

75th AAD Annual Meeting

Cost-effectiveness of apremilast (Otezla )

Emerging Insights in the Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Pharmacy Accreditation

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:

Background AN UPDATED LOOK AT TREATMENTS FOR PLAQUE PSORIASIS JULY 2018 PLAQUE PSORIASIS TARGETED IMMUNOMODULATORS AS A TREATMENT OPTION

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

Incorporating Biologics Into Your Practice

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

(Poster presented on Sunday 05 March, 08:50 08:55; 2017 AAD Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA)

Update on systemic therapies and emerging treatments How do I choose a systemic agent?

Source: American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting held February 16 20, 2018, in San Diego, California

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.264

P4081 Secukinumab skin clearance is associated with greater improvements in patient-reported pain, itching, and scaling

JEADV SHORT REPORT. Abstract

Clinical Policy: Apremilast (Otezla) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.245 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

Targeted Immunomodulators for the Treatment of Moderate-to- Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Effectiveness and Value

JEADV SHORT REPORT. Abstract

Clinical Policy: Apremilast (Otezla) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.245 Effective Date: 08/16 Last Review Date 08/17

ICER Public Meeting: Evaluating Emerging Therapies for Psoriasis and Endometriosis

Drug Class Review Targeted Immune Modulators

Otezla. Otezla (apremilast) Description

Actual use of medications is important for payers

Bruce Strober 1, 2, Chitra Karki 3, Marc Mason 3, Jeffrey D Greenberg 3,4, Mark Lebwohl 5

USTEKINUMAB Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other USTEKINUMAB STELARA GUIDELINES FOR USE

Psoriasis Disease Severity Affects Patient Satisfaction With Therapy

This questionnaire was used both during the face-to-face interviews with the

Formulary Decisions and the Evolution of Psoriasis Treatment

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Medicare Part C Medical Coverage Policy

University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA; 2

ETANERCEPT Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other ETANERCEPT ENBREL GUIDELINES FOR USE INITIAL CRITERIA (NOTE: FOR RENEWAL CRITERIA SEE BELOW)

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.01 Effective Date:

ustekinumab (Stelara )

Research Developments in Psoriasis Treatment A CME Activity

Jashin J Wu, 1 Alexander Egeberg, 2 James A Solomon, 3,4,5 Olawale Osuntokun, 6 Orin Goldblum, 6 Susan R Moriarty, 6 Fangyi Zhao, 6 Neil Korman 7

Association between disease severity and body mass index in psoriasis patients enrolled in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

First Real-World Insights on Apremilast Therapy for Patients With Plaque Psoriasis From the LAPIS-PSO Study: An Interim Analysis

The psychosocial impact of psoriasis is a critical component

The role of current biologic therapies in psoriasis

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.261 Effective Date: 08/16 Last Review Date: 08/17

TNF Inhibitors: Lessons From Immunogenicity

DRAFT. Therapeutic Class Code: D6A, S2J, S2M, S2Q, Z2U, Z2Z, S2Z, L1A, S2V, Z2V, D6K Therapeutic Class Description: Injectable Immunomodulators

Biologics and Psoriasis: The Beat Goes On

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

The Cosentyx clinical trial programme 1-11

Evaluating Biologic Therapies for Psoriasis Strategies to Reduce Cost and Improve Patient Access and Outcomes

Biologics in Psoriasis. Peter CM van de Kerkhof Department of Dermatology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: ERX.SPMN.167

ixekizumab 80mg solution for injection (Taltz ) SMC No. (1223/17) Eli Lilly and Company Ltd.

Drug Class Review Targeted Immune Modulators

Correspondence should be addressed to Shu-Hui Wang;

STELARA (USTEKINUMAB)

Regulatory Status FDA-approved indication: Orencia is a selective T cell costimulation modulator indicated for: (1)

PharmaPoint: Psoriasis - Global Drug Forecast and Market Analysis to 2024

When researchers discovered in 1979 that the immunosuppressant

Mark G. Lebwohl 1 Arthur Kavanaugh

Summer AAD Summer AAD Support provided by LEO Pharma A/S. Poster nº

Evaluating Psoriasis: Patient Reported Outcomes and Impact of Disease

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.165 Effective Date:

The Medical Letter. on Drugs and Therapeutics

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 12 July 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta455

Insights from the Kaiser Permanente database

Cosentyx. Cosentyx (secukinumab) Description

Clinical Policy: Secukinumab (Cosentyx) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.261 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

What's Now, What's Next: Individualizing the Treatment of Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis for the Dermatologist Presentation 1

Regulatory Status FDA- approved indication: Simponi and Simponi ARIA are tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers indicated for the treatment of: (2-3)

Prior Authorization Conditions for Approval of Enbrel (etanercept) Website Form Submit request via: Fax

Approximately 3% of the US adult population,

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1174DFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1170DFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

PGA x BSA as a PASI Surrogate

chemotherapeutic agents in

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA;

Calcipotriol Plus Betamethasone Dipropionate Aerosol Foam in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Sub-Group Analysis of the PSO-ABLE Study

STELARA (USTEKINUMAB)

Ustekinumab (Stelara) for psoriatic arthritis second line after disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)

4/10/18. Faculty. Disclosures. Confronting Psoriatic Disease: Putting New Tools to Work

Clinical Policy: Ustekinumab (Stelara) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.264 Effective Date: Last Review Date: Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid

The New and Emerging Agents: Dermatology

STELARA (USTEKINUMAB)

Symptom Severity, Quality of Life and Work Productivity of US Psoriasis Patients During Periods of Flare and Remission

J. Gelfand 1, A. Joshi 2, D. Shin 1, A. Dey 2, D. Torigian 1, D. Rader 1, M. Playford 2, M. Ahlman 2, A. Alavi 1, N. Mehta 2.

Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University. Dermatology Faculty Publications

Selective Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Psoriasis: Focus on Apremilast

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT FOR MODERATE-TO-SEVERE PSORIASIS

Clinical Policy: Ixekizumab (Taltz) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.257 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 05.18

Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial

Stelara. Stelara (ustekinumab) Description

Transcription:

1108 Cost per Responder of Apremilast Versus Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD 1 ; Tom Tencer, PhD 2 ; Zoe Clancy, PharmD, MS 2 ; Frank Zhang, MD, MPH 2 1 Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; 2 Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ Presented at: the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 20-24, 2015; San Francisco, CA. This study was sponsored by Celgene Corporation.

Disclosures Dr. Steven Feldman has received honoraria and research grants as an investigator, speaker, and/or consultant for Abbott Labs, Amgen, Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Baxter, Caremark, Celgene, Galderma, Gerson Lehrman Group, Guidepoint Global, Hanall Pharmaceutical, Janssen, Kikaku, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Merck, Merz, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Qurient, Stiefel/GSK, Suncare Research, Taro, and XenoPort; and has received royalties or owns stock in Causa Technologies, Informa Healthcare, Medical Quality Enhancement Corporation, UpToDate, and Xlibris. Dr. Tom Tencer, Dr. Zoe Clancy, and Dr. Frank Zhang are employees of Celgene Corporation.

Abstract Background: In the United States, psoriasis is estimated to affect 7.4 million adults and to cost $112B annually (Rachakonda et al, 2014; Menter et al, 2008; Brezinski et al, 2015). It is becoming increasingly important to investigate the value of new treatment options in the management of psoriasis. Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost per responder after 16 weeks of therapy for adult psoriasis patients in the United States treated with apremilast, etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab. Methods: Comparative efficacy data were obtained from a Bayesian network meta-analysis of 19 clinical trials as of October 2013 that included at least one treatment of interest (biologic or oral systemic drug) as monotherapy that reported one or more efficacy/safety endpoint. The primary outcome was a 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI-75) at the end of the trial period (12 or 16 weeks, depending on drug). Cost and efficacy comparisons were made at Week 16, and efficacy for drugs with a trial period of 12 weeks was assumed to be maintained through 16 weeks. The first 2 weeks of apremilast treatment (starter pack) are provided at no cost. US wholesale acquisition cost as of July 2014 and approved labeled dosing for induction of psoriasis treatment were used to derive drug treatment costs. Results: At Week 16, the adjusted PASI-75 response rate was 31.9% for apremilast, 52.6% for etanercept, 65.9% for adalimumab, 68.6% for ustekinumab 45 mg, and 74.0% for ustekinumab 90 mg. The cost per PASI-75 responder at Week 16 was $18,938 for apremilast, $33,508 for etanercept, $20,294 for adalimumab, $21,497 for ustekinumab 45 mg, and $39,857 for ustekinumab 90 mg. Conclusion: Apremilast had the lowest wholesale acquisition cost per PASI-75 responder and the lowest cost per PASI-75 response through 16 weeks in psoriasis patients as compared with etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab 45 mg, and ustekinumab 90 mg.

Background In the United States, psoriasis is estimated to cost $112B annually (total direct and indirect healthcare costs). 1 It is becoming increasingly important to payers to investigate the value of new treatment options in the management of psoriasis. Due to the lack of head-to-head studies demonstrating the comparative effectiveness of treatments for psoriasis, indirect analyses may be used to aid in treatment decision making. 1. Brezinski EA, et al. JAMA Dermatol. Jan 7, 2015 [Epub ahead of print].

Objective The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost per responder after 16 weeks of therapy for adult patients with psoriasis treated in the United States with apremilast, etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab. Apremilast was approved by the FDA in 2014 and by the EC in 2015 for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. 1,2 EC=European Commission; FDA=US Food and Drug Administration. 1. Otezla [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Celgene Corporation, 2014; 2. Otezla (apremilast) summary of product characteristics. Uxbridge, UK: Celgene Europe Ltd.; January 2015.

Methods Comparative efficacy data were obtained from a Bayesian network meta-analysis of biologic and oral systemic drugs as of October 2013. Response to therapy was assessed using 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at the end of the clinical trial period (12 or 16 weeks, depending on the study drug). Published rates were extracted, with the primary outcome defined as a 75% reduction in PASI score (PASI-75) at the end of the clinical trial period. Cost and efficacy comparisons were made at Week 16, and efficacy for drugs with a trial period of 12 weeks was assumed to be maintained through 16 weeks. Non-responders at Week 16 were assumed to discontinue treatment. US wholesale acquisition costs as of July 2014 and approved labeled dosing for induction of psoriasis treatment were used to derive drug treatment costs.

The Cost per Responder Model Calculates Expected Treatment Cost by Considering PASI-75 Response Rates Responder Apremilast Apremilast PASI-75 Response Rate Cost incurred by responder by Week 52 Non- Responder Cost incurred by non-responder Responder Legend Decision node Chance node Biologic Comparator Biologic PASI-75 Response Rate Non- Responder Cost incurred by non-responder Cost incurred by responder by Week 52 Terminal node

Model Inputs: Treatment Efficacy Treatment Efficacy Clinical efficacy data were obtained from an internal Bayesian network meta-analysis. At Week 16, the adjusted PASI-75 response rate was 32% for apremilast; the efficacy of comparator treatments is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Efficacy of Comparator Treatments for Psoriasis Treatment PASI-75 Reference Etanercept 53% Network meta-analysis Adalimumab 66% Network meta-analysis Ustekinumab 45 mg 69% Network meta-analysis Ustekinumab 90 mg 74% Network meta-analysis Costs Drug costs were sourced from wholesale acquisition cost prices on November 15, 2014 (Table 2). 1,2 1. AnalySource Monthly. San Francisco, CA: First Databank. https://www.analysource.com. Updated September 24, 2014. Accessed September 24, 2014; 2. Pricentric. Somerset, NJ: Alliance Life Sciences. Updated August 2014;

Model Inputs: Costs Table 2. Drug Costs and Dosage Description of Treatments for Psoriasis Drug Dosage Description Trial Period Pack Cost First Month Second Month Third Month Continued Use Adalimumab 80 mg initial dose, then 40 mg every other week starting 1 week after initial dose 16 weeks 1 $1,350.16 $5,400.64 $2,700.32 $2,700.32 $2,700.32 Etanercept Apremilast Ustekinumab 45 mg* Ustekinumab 90 mg* 50 mg twice weekly for 3 months, then 50 mg weekly 30 mg BID 45 mg dose at initiation, then at Week 4, then every 12 weeks 45 mg dose at initiation, then at Week 4, then every 12 weeks 12 weeks 2 $675.20 $5,401.60 $5,401.60 $5,401.60 $2,700.80 16 weeks 3 $30.82 $862.96 $1,725.92 $1,725.92 $1,725.92 12 weeks 4 $7,661.16 $15,322.32 - - $2,553.72 12 weeks 4 $15,322.28 $30,644.56 - - $5,107.43 *Due to the dosing description, ustekinumab drug costs are calculated as 2 doses for the first month, and 1 dose divided over 12 weeks for continued use. 1. Humira [package insert]. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie, Inc; 2014; 2. Enbrel [package insert]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Immunex Corporation; 2013; 3. Otezla [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Celgene Corporation; 2014. 4. Stelara [package insert]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc; 2012.

Results: Cost per PASI-75 Responder at Year 1 The cost per PASI-75 responder at Week 16 was $18,938 for apremilast, $33,508 for etanercept, $20,488 for adalimumab, $22,336 for ustekinumab 45 mg, and $41,412 for ustekinumab 90 mg. The cost per PASI-75 responder at Year 1 was $34,472 for apremilast, $57,816 for etanercept, $44,791 for adalimumab, $45,319 for ustekinumab 45 mg, and $87,378 for ustekinumab 90 mg (Figure 1). Cost per PASI-75 Responder at Year 1 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 Figure 1. Cost per PASI-75 Responder at Year 1 $34,472 $57,816 $44,791 $45,319 $87,378 $0 Apremilast Etanercept Adalimumab Ustekinumab Ustekinumab Apremilast 30 mg Etanercept 50 mg Adalimumab 40 mg Ustekinumab 45 mg Ustekinumab 90 mg 30 mg 50 mg 40 mg 45 mg 90 mg Psoriasis Treatment

Results The cost to achieve 100 responders at Week 16 was: $1,893,761 for apremilast $3,350,840 for etanercept $2,048,801 for adalimumab $2,233,574 for ustekinumab 45 mg $4,141,157 for ustekinumab 90 mg In a scenario in which a payer has an annual budget of $1 million, the model calculated the number of treatable patients at Year 1 by dividing the annual budget by the annual cost of treatment (Figure 2A) and the number of responders out of the treatable patients at Year 1 (Figure 2B). Apremilast had the most treatable patients and responders at Year 1.

Results Number of Treatable Patients Figure 2A. Treatable Patients With an Annual Funding of $1 Million at Year 1 100 91 90 80 70 60 50 40 33 34 32 30 20 15 10 0 Apremilast Apremilast 30 mg Etanercept Etanercept 50 mg Adalimumab Adalimumab 40 mg Ustekinumab 45 mgustekinumab 30 mg 50 mg 40 mg 45 mg 90 mg Psoriasis Treatment

Results 35 Figure 2B. Number of Responders Out of Treatable Patients at Year 1 Number of Responders 30 25 20 15 10 5 29 17 22 22 11 0 Apremilast Apremilast 30 mg Etanercept Etanercept 50 mg Adalimumab Adalimumab 40 mg Ustekinumab 45 mgustekinumab 30 mg 50 mg 40 mg 45 mg 90 mg Psoriasis Treatment

Limitations There is a lack of evidence from long-term, randomized, controlled trials vs. placebo. Thus, 1-year cost per responder assumed that short-term response rates were maintained for the full year. Efficacy results used in the model were indirectly derived from a network meta-analysis. Although this is expected to reduce bias when making comparisons of treatment effect between treatments, unknown differences and cross-trial heterogeneity may confound these results. Additional head-to-head clinical trials would be required to account for unobserved confounding.

Conclusion Apremilast had the lowest wholesale acquisition cost per PASI-75 responder and the lowest cost to achieve PASI-75 responders at both Week 16 and Year 1 in psoriasis patients as compared with etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab 45 mg, and ustekinumab 90 mg.