GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 2 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Period of diagnosis % Relative survival N=46,

Similar documents
Munich Cancer Registry

GENERAL ICD- C73: Thyroid cancer Page 2 of 15 ICD- C73: Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland Period of diagnosis % Relative survival N=7,95 9

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Cases with invasive cancer by year of diagnosis, proportions of DCO, further malignancies, deaths, and active follow-up (incl.

Cases by year of diagnosis, proportions of further malignancies, deaths, and active follow-up (ALL PATIENTS)

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Cases with invasive cancer by year of diagnosis, proportions of DCO, further malignancies, deaths, and active follow-up (ALL PATIENTS) (incl.

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

Munich Cancer Registry

INTRODUCTION TO CANCER STAGING

Quality ID #250 (NQF 1853): Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

4/10/2018. SEER EOD and Summary Stage. Overview KCR 2018 SPRING TRAINING. What is SEER EOD? Ambiguous Terminology General Guidelines

Boot Camp /5/15

Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma Site Specific Clinical Reference Group Data Quality Report 2009

CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I

Surgical Management of Metastatic Colon Cancer: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

Outline. How to Use the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7 th ed. 7/9/2015 FCDS ANNUAL CONFERENCE ST PETERSBURG, FLORIDA JULY 30, 2015.

Research Article Clinical Features and Outcomes Differ between Skeletal and Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma

An Overview of Survival Statistics in SEER*Stat

Extract from Cancer survival in Europe by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 a population-based study

Measure #250 (NQF 1853): Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clincial Care

Recurrent lung cancer icd 10

Trends in Cancer Survival in NSW 1980 to 1996

EXPLORING THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF REGISTRY DATA ON STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS

WHI Extension Appendix A, Form Report of Cancer Outcome (Ver. 8.2) Page 1

The projection of short- and long-term survival for. Conditional Survival Among Patients With Carcinoma of the Lung*

Ethnic Disparities in the Treatment of Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Juan P. Wisnivesky, MD, MPH, Thomas McGinn, MD, MPH, Claudia Henschke, PhD,

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, INDIA. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Medical Oncology, and Radiology

Chapter 13 Cancer of the Female Breast

A Comprehensive Approach to. International Cancer Survival Benchmarking. SurvMark-2

Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. Kidney Cancer

Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. Melanoma of the Skin

Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. Childhood Cancer

Boot Camp /5/15

Update on SLN and Melanoma: DECOG and MSLT-II. Gordon H. Hafner, MD, FACS

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Comparison between Overall, Cause-specific, and Relative Survival Rates Based on Data from a Population-based Cancer Registry

CANCER FACTS & FIGURES For African Americans

Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. Breast Cancer

Supplementary Online Content

2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine. Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations

CDC & Florida DOH Attribution

Cancer registry. Azin.Nahvijou, MD, PhD Candidate

AJCC TNM 6 th Edition Staging Input Data Dictionary

Comparative Analysis of Stage and Other Prognostic Factors Among Urethral, Ureteral, and Renal Pelvis Malignant Tumors

Atlas of cancer incidence and mortality. of the. Association of Population-based Cancer Registries in Germany (GEKID)

Validation of the T descriptor in the new 8th TNM classification for non-small cell lung cancer

Report to Waikato Medical Research Foundation

3/23/2017. Disclaimer. Common Changes in TNM Staging. Overview. Overview. Understanding Terminology. Overview

CERVIX MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS

Dx code for breast cancer in remission

AJCC TNM STAGING UPDATES ARE YOU READY FOR TNM?

5/8/2014. AJCC Stage Introduction and General Rules. Acknowledgements* Introduction. Melissa Pearson, CTR North Carolina Central Cancer Registry

NUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade

TOPIC Presenter Rihab Sidahmed Ibnoaf Arabic perspective of principles of Screening and diagnostics in Ovarian Cancer, Sudan.

Xiang Hu*, Liang Cao*, Yi Yu. Introduction

Treatment disparities among elderly colon cancer patients in the United States using SEER-Medicare data

Combined chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Patients with Breast Cancer and Extensive Nodal Involvement.

Revisiting Stage IIIB and IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data

Reevaluating the prognostic significance of male gender for papillary thyroid carcinoma and microcarcinoma: a SEER database analysis

Cancer in Estonia 2014

Defining TNM Staging and Early Stage NSCLC

Trends in Lung Cancer Morbidity and Mortality

Q&A Session NAACCR Webinar Series Collecting Cancer Data: Pancreas January 05, 2012

Cancer Registry in Germany: The Munich Experience

Temporal Trends in Demographics and Overall Survival of Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center From 1986 to 2008

Staging Systems. Malcolm Mason UICC TNM Core Group and Cardiff University, UK

Lung cancer pleural invasion was recognized as a poor prognostic

Subject: Axitinib (Inlyta ) Tablets

We re on the Web! Visit us at VOLUME 19 ISSUE 1. January 2015

NCDB Vendor Webinar: NCDB Call for Data January 2018 and Upcoming RQRS Revisions

Corporate Medical Policy

Summary Report Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. February Surveillance and Health Status Assessment Cancer Surveillance

Best Papers. F. Fusco

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Study Period: Objectives: Indication: Study Investigators/Centers: Research Methods: Data Source

The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNC)

Research Article Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer following Gastrectomy and Extended Lymphadenectomy

THE ISSUE OF STAGE AT DIAGNOSIS

ARTICLE RESEARCH. Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

Survival in sinonasal and middle ear malignancies: a population-based study using the SEER database

AJCC 7th Edition Handbook Errata as of 9/21/10

WHI Extension Section 8 Outcomes Page 8-85

George Cernile Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Toronto, ON. Carol L. Kosary National Cancer Institute Rockville, MD

2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality Journal Club 24/11/12

Supplementary Online Content

Transcription:

Munich Cancer Registry Incidence and Mortality Selection Matrix Homepage Deutsch ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Survival Year of diagnosis 1988-1997 1998-215 Patients 7,45 49,513 Diseases 7,45 49,514 Cases evaluated 6,621 4,8 Creation date 8/22/217 Export date 8/16/217 Population (males) 2.38 m BERLIN GERMANY BAVARIA MUNICH Munich Cancer Registry at Munich Cancer Center Marchioninistr. 15 Munich, 81377 Germany https://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/en https://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/en/facts/surv/sc61 E-ICD--C61-Prostate-cancersurvival.pdf

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 2 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Period of diagnosis % Relative survival 1988-215 N=46,592 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 Figure 1a. Relative survival of patients with prostate cancer by period of diagnosis. Included in the evaluation are 46,592 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 215. The presented survival curves are derived from clinical records with valid follow-up informations, which means that death certificate cases (DCO) cases are omitted from the analysis. With this one restriction, the MCR has provided populationbased statistics since 1998, collecting data on all cancer cases in the region of southern Bavaria. Historical data of previous time periods can be heavily selected, therefore, univariate survival comparisons of the presented time periods must be carefully considered. Nonetheless, all calculable survival curves are depicted to facilitate the comparison of long time follow-up analyses of relative survival between particular cancers. Period of diagnosis 1988-1997 1998-26 27+ n=6,613 n=18,633 n=21,346 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %...... 1 94.4 99.2 95.9 99.3 96.1 99.1 2 88.3 97.3 91.9 98.5 92.1 98. 3 82.4 95.3 87.8 97.5 87.8 96.5 4 77.2 93.8 83.9 96.6 84.1 95.5 5 72.3 92.3 8.3 95.8 8.5 94.6 6 68. 91.1 76.8 95.1 76.9 93.7 7 63.6 89.5 73.1 94.1 73.6 92.9 8 59.5 88. 69.7 93.3 69.8 91.7 9 55.9 87. 66.2 92.5 52.1 85.4 62.6 91.3 11 48.7 84.1 59. 9. 12 45.5 82.8 55.9 89.3 13 42.1 8.9 52.7 88.4 14 39.4 8.1 49.6 87.6 15 37. 79.7 47.2 88. Table 1b. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with prostate cancer by period of diagnosis for period 1988-215 (N=46,592). Period of diagnosis 1988-1997 n=6,613 14.2% 1998-26 n=18,633 4.% 27+ n=21,346 45.8%

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 3 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Year of diagnosis % Relative survival 1998-215 N=39,979 1 Year of diagnosis 1998 n=1,255 3.1% 9 8 7 6 5 1999 n=1,266 3.2% 2 n=1,395 3.5% 21 n=1,483 3.7% 22 n=2,688 6.7% 23 n=2,726 6.8% 24 n=2,68 6.7% 25 n=2,62 6.6% 26 n=2,52 6.3% 27 n=2,964 7.4% 28 n=2,68 6.7% 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 29 n=2,448 6.1% 2 n=2,372 5.9% 211 n=2,558 6.4% 212 n=2,638 6.6% 213 n=2,295 5.7% 214 n=2,195 5.5% 215 n=1,196 3.% SEER 2-214 n=585,397 Figure 1c. Relative survival of patients with prostate cancer by year of diagnosis. Included in the evaluation are 39,979 cases diagnosed between 1998 and 215. The survival results of the SEER program (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) of the American National Cancer Institute (NCI) are summarized as the period of diagnosis from 2 to 214, and are represented by colored diamonds in order to facilitate comparisons between MCR and SEER. Year of diagnosis 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 n=1,255 n=1,266 n=1,395 n=1,483 n=2,688 n=2,726 n=2,68 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %.............. 1 92.1 96. 95.2 99. 96.5.2 94.9 98.4 96.1 99.6 96.8.1 97.1.2 2 87.6 95.1 9.4 97.8 92.2 99.4 9.9 97.8 92.2 99. 93.2 99.7 93.3 99.5 3 82.8 93.6 85.1 95.6 87.9 98.4 86.7 96.7 88.1 98.1 89.8 99.3 89.1 98.2 4 78.4 92.3 79.4 92.8 83.9 97.5 83.3 96.3 84.1 97.2 86.4 98.9 86.2 98.1 5 73.7 9.5 75.9 92.2 79.5 96.2 79.7 95.7 81.2 97.3 82.3 97.7 82.4 97.2 6 69.6 89. 71.8 9.9 75.7 95.3 76.9 96. 77.1 95.9 79. 97.2 79.2 96.7 7 65.8 87.7 68.4 9. 72.2 94.6 73.2 95.1 73.1 94.5 75.3 96.3 76.1 96.4 8 62.6 87. 64.6 88.5 68.9 94. 69.2 93.7 69.3 93.3 72.1 95.9 72.7 95.8 9 58.6 85.2 61.1 87.4 65.3 93. 65.6 92.7 65.9 92.4 68.5 95. 69.4 95.2 54.9 83.4 57.3 85.5 61.5 91.6 63. 93. 62.6 91.6 64.5 93.4 66.1 94.6 11 51.8 82.4 53.9 84.2 57.8 9.1 59.5 91.8 59.3 9.9 6.2 91.2 62.3 93.1 12 49. 81.9 51.2 83.5 53.9 88. 56.7 91.9 56.5 9.7 57. 9.4 13 46.4 81.4 48.3 82.8 5.6 86.8 52.8 89.9 53.6 9.3 54. 89.4 14 43.1 79.7 45.9 82.6 47.7 85.9 5.1 89.8 5.3 88.9 15 4.4 78.6 44. 83.6 45.7 86.7

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 4 of 18 Year of diagnosis cont'd 25 26 27 28 29 2 211 n=2,62 n=2,52 n=2,964 n=2,68 n=2,448 n=2,372 n=2,558 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %.............. 1 96.5 99.6 95.6 98.6 96.4 99.4 96.1 99.1 96. 98.9 96. 99. 95.9 98.9 2 92.6 98.9 91.2 97.2 93.3 99.2 92.2 98.2 91.5 97.2 91.3 97.1 91.8 97.7 3 88.8 98. 87.3 96.1 89.4 98.1 88.1 96.8 86.6 94.9 87.6 96.1 87.7 96.4 4 84.6 96.6 83.7 95.3 85.3 96.7 85. 96.5 82.6 93.5 83.6 94.9 84.2 95.8 5 81.1 96. 8. 94.4 82.1 96.3 8.7 94.9 79.2 92.7 79.5 93.3 6 77.7 95.3 77.2 94.5 78.4 95.3 77.4 94.4 75.2 91.1 7 74.1 94.4 73. 92.7 75.2 94.8 73.8 93.4 8 71.3 94.4 69.4 91.6 71.4 93.4 9 68.2 94. 66.2 91. 63.9 91.9 11 6.5 9.4 Year of diagnosis cont'd 212 213 214 215 n=2,638 n=2,295 n=2,195 n=1,196 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %........ 1 96.3 99.3 95.8 98.7 96.1 99.2 96.5 98.7 2 92.8 98.8 91. 96.8 3 88.1 97. Table 1d. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with prostate cancer by year of diagnosis for period 1998-215 (N=39,979).

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 5 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Total cohort % Survival 1998-215 N=39,979 N=39979 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 Observed Expected Relative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 Figure 2a. Observed, expected and relative survival of the total cohort with prostate cancer. Included in the evaluation are 39,979 cases diagnosed between 1998 and 215. Group Total cohort n=39,979 obs. % rel. %.. 1 96. 99.2 2 92. 98.2 3 87.8 97. 4 84. 96. 5 8.4 95.2 6 76.8 94.4 7 73.3 93.5 8 69.8 92.7 9 66.4 91.9 62.8 9.7 11 59.2 89.4 12 56. 88.7 13 52.9 87.8 14 49.8 87.1 15 47.4 87.4 Table 2b. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of the total cohort with prostate cancer for period 1998-215 (N=39,979). Group Total cohort n=39,979.%

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 6 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Age category % Observed survival 1988-215 N=46,592 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 Figure 3a. Observed survival of patients with prostate cancer by age category. Included in the evaluation are 46,592 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 215. Age category -59 yrs n=6,4 13.8% 6-69 yrs n=18,449 39.6% 7-79 yrs n=16,94 36.3% 8+ yrs n=4,829.4% ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Age category % Relative survival 1988-215 N=46,592 1 9 8 Age category -59 yrs n=6,4 13.8% 6-69 yrs n=18,449 39.6% 7-79 yrs n=16,94 36.3% 7 8+ yrs n=4,829.4% 6 5 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 Figure 3b. Relative survival of patients with prostate cancer by age category. Included in the evaluation are 46,592 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 215.

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 7 of 18 Age category -59 yrs 6-69 yrs 7-79 yrs 8+ yrs n=6,4 n=18,449 n=16,94 n=4,829 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %........ 1 98.5 99.3 97.9 99.7 95.4 99.4 85.3 95.9 2 96.6 98.1 95.4 99. 9.6 98.7 72.8 92.5 3 94.4 96.8 92.8 98.4 85.2 97.3 61.3 88.7 4 92.4 95.7 9.2 97.8 8.4 96.8 51.5 85.5 5 9.6 94.9 87.8 97.5 75.4 96.1 42.8 82.4 6 89. 94.3 85.5 97.4 7.6 95.7 34.8 78.7 7 87.3 93.6 82.9 97.2 65.5 95. 27.9 74.8 8 85.7 93.1 8.4 97.1 6.4 94.3 22.2 71.8 9 84.1 92.7 78.2 97.6 55. 93.2 17.4 69. 82.1 92. 75.4 97.5 49.6 91.8 13.2 64.9 11 8.3 91.4 72.2 97.1 44.6 9.9. 62. 12 78. 9.5 69.6 97.6 4. 9.8 7.4 59.4 13 76.4 9.4 66.6 97.8 34.9 88.8 5.5 59.2 14 74.6 9.2 63.3 97.8.9 89.1 4.5 64.3 15 73.4 9.9 6.4 98.8 27.6 91.3 3.1 62.2 Table 3c. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with prostate cancer by age category for period 1988-215 (N=46,592).

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 8 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate TNM staging % Relative survival 1988-215 N=38,357 1 TNM staging 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 T1 n=6,438 16.8% T2 n=18,612 48.5% T3 n=9,988 26.% T4 n=1,73 4.4% N n=23,786 62.% N+ n=2,978 7.8% NX n=6,765 17.6% M1 n=2,92 7.6% NA/NOS n=8,235 21.5% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 4a. Relative survival of patients with prostate cancer by TNM staging. For 38,482 of 46,592 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 215 valid data could be obtained for this item. For a total of 38,357 cases an evaluable classification was established. The accumulated percentage exceeds the % value because patients are potientially considered in more than one subgroup. The grey line represents the subgroup of 8,235 patients with missing values regarding TNM staging (17.7 % of 46,592 patients, the percent values of all other categories are related to n=38,357). TNM staging T1 T2 T3 T4 N N+ NX n=6,438 n=18,612 n=9,988 n=1,73 n=23,786 n=2,978 n=6,765 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %.............. 1 95.7.2 98.7 1.2 97.7.5 86.3 9.3 99.1 1.5 94.3 96.7 93. 97.7 2 91.5.3 97.1 2.2 94.5.1 71.9 78.5 97.8 2.7 87. 91.6 86.3 95.2 3 86.9 99.8 95.4 3.1 9.5 98.8 61.5 7. 96.3 3.8 79.6 86.1 79.7 92.5 4 82.2 99.3 93.5 4. 87. 98. 52.2 62. 94.5 4.8 72.9 81.2 73.8 9.1 5 77.8 98.8 91.3 4.7 83. 96.7 46.1 57. 92.5 5.5 67.2 77.2 68.2 87.8 6 73.2 98. 89.1 5.4 79.6 96. 4.2 51.8 9.2 6.2 62.9 74.5 63.5 86.3 7 68.3 96.6 86.8 6.2 75.9 94.8 35.7 48.1 87.9 7. 58.7 71.8 58.3 83.6 8 62.9 94.3 84.4 6.9 72.4 94.1 32.3 45.4 85.6 7.8 54.3 68.9 53.4 81. 9 58.8 93.5 81.9 7.6 68.7 92.8 29.2 42.9 82.9 8.4 49.4 65.1 49.2 79.1 53.7 9.7 79.1 8. 64.9 91.4 25.4 39. 79.9 8.6 45.5 62.3 44.8 76.2

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 9 of 18 TNM staging cont'd M1 NA/NOS n=2,92 n=8,235 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %.... 1 78.2 81.8 92.4 97.3 2 55.7 6.7 85.1 94.6 3 4. 45.4 77.1 9.4 4 29.5 35. 69.8 86.6 5 22.4 27.7 63. 82.9 6 17.8 23. 56.4 78.8 7 13.9 18.8 49.9 74.3 8 11.9 16.7 44. 69.9 9 9.9 14.7 38.9 66. 8.2 12.6 33.9 61.5 Table 4b. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with prostate cancer by TNM staging for period 1988-215 (N=38,357).

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate TNM staging % Relative survival 1998-215 N=32,594 1 TNM staging 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 T1 n=5,46 16.8% T2 n=16,743 51.4% T3 n=7,915 24.3% T4 n=1,116 3.4% N n=2,486 62.9% N+ n=2,38 7.3% NX n=5,18 15.9% M1 n=2,47 7.4% NA/NOS n=7,385 22.7% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 4c. Relative survival of patients with prostate cancer by TNM staging. For 32,77 of 39,979 cases diagnosed between 1998 and 215 valid data could be obtained for this item. For a total of 32,594 cases an evaluable classification was established. The accumulated percentage exceeds the % value because patients are potientially considered in more than one subgroup. The grey line represents the subgroup of 7,385 patients with missing values regarding TNM staging (18.5 % of 39,979 patients, the percent values of all other categories are related to n=32,594). TNM staging T1 T2 T3 T4 N N+ NX n=5,46 n=16,743 n=7,915 n=1,116 n=2,486 n=2,38 n=5,18 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %.............. 1 95.8 99.9 98.8 1.2 98.1.6 87.8 91. 99.3 1.5 94.8 97. 94.2 98.3 2 92..2 97.5 2.3 95.5.5 73.1 78.6 98.2 2.8 87.6 91.9 89. 96.8 3 87.6 99.9 95.7 3.1 92.2 99.6 63.8 7.9 96.9 3.9 81. 87.2 83.3 94.6 4 83.3 99.5 94. 4. 89. 99. 54.8 63.1 95.3 4.9 74.5 82.4 78.1 92.9 5 78.9 99. 91.9 4.7 85.5 98. 48. 57.3 93.4 5.7 68.9 78.3 73.3 91.4 6 74.5 98.2 89.8 5.5 82.3 97.4 42.7 52.7 91.4 6.5 64.8 75.9 69. 9.1 7 69.6 96.8 87.7 6.3 78.7 96.3 39.1 5. 89.3 7.3 6.4 73. 64.1 87.9 8 64.6 95. 85.4 7. 75.8 95.9 35.9 47.8 87.1 8.2 56.7 7.8 59.6 86. 9 6.6 94.4 82.9 7.7 72.1 94.8 32.9 45.5 84.6 8.9 52. 67.3 55.7 84.6 55.6 91.9 8.3 8.3 67.7 92.7.2 43.5 81.6 9. 48.3 64.8 51.5 82.7

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 11 of 18 TNM staging cont'd M1 NA/NOS n=2,47 n=7,385 obs. % rel. % obs. % rel. %.... 1 78.1 81.4 92.3 97.1 2 56.6 61.3 85. 94.1 3 41. 46.2 76.9 89.9 4 31. 36.2 69.6 85.9 5 23.8 29. 63.1 82.4 6 19.2 24.4 56.3 78.1 7 15.8 2.8 49.6 73.2 8 13.3 18.3 43.4 68.3 9 11.5 16.6 38.1 64.1 9.7 14.5 33.3 59.9 Table 4d. Observed (obs.) and relative (rel.) survival of patients with prostate cancer by TNM staging for period 1998-215 (N=32,594).

GENERAL ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 12 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Extent of disease % Conditional relative 5 year survival 1988-215 N=38,313 1 9 8 Extent of disease Local n=33,137 86.5% Regional n=2,274 5.9% Distant n=2,92 7.6% 7 NA/NOS n=8,279 17.8% 6 5 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time since diagnosis (years) Figure 4e. Conditional relative 5-year survival of patients with prostate cancer by extent of disease. For 38,482 of 46,592 cases diagnosed between 1988 and 215 valid data could be obtained for this item. For a total of 38,313 cases an evaluable classification was established. The grey line represents the subgroup of 8,279 patients with missing values regarding extent of disease (17.8 % of 46,592 patients, the percent values of all other categories are related to n=38,313). Extent of disease Local Regional Distant NA/NOS Cond. Cond. Cond. Cond. surv. % surv. % surv. % surv. % n 5 yrs n 5 yrs n 5 yrs n 5 yrs 33,137 3.1 2,274 9. 2,92 27.7 8,279 83. 1 31,41 2.5 2,91 87.8 2,131 28.4 7,237 81.9 2 29,33 1.8 1,877 86.9 1,422 31.3 6,283 8. 3 26,754 1.6 1,642 86.2 943 37.5 5,327 79.2 4 24,34 1.5 1,411 84.8 64 43. 4,379 79.1 5 21,979 1.2 1,214 84.4 442 46.8 3,549 77.7 6 19,8.8 1,43 81.5 327 49. 2,92 77. 7 17,561 1.1 91 81.9 2 54.3 2,376 77.5 8 15,243 1.1 739 81.4 167 49.3 1,932 76.9 9 12,853 1.1 6 84.1 126 51.5 1,566 78.2,896 2.8 55 84.9 1,244 8.1 Table 4f. Conditional relative 5-year survival of patients with prostate cancer by extent of disease for period 1988-215 (N=38,313). Conditional relative survival rates refer to the relative survival probability, in this case for 5 years after cancer diagnosis, compared to the age- and sex-matched population (= %) under the condition of being alive for a certain time period (x-axis in Figure 4c). The results illustrate to what extent the cancer induced mortality of particular subgroups declines in the subsequent years after detection of the malignancy. For instance, according to the presented survival statistics, patients in the subgroup extent of disease= Local, who are alive at least 3 years after cancer diagnosis, the conditional relative 5-year survival rate is 1.6% (n=26,754).

PROGRESSION ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 13 of 18 % Time to first progression (TTP) 1998-215 N=37,228 25 2 15 5 Type of progression Any type (CI) Events=6,646 Any type (1-KM) Events=6,646 Local relapse (CI) Events=1,531 Local relapse (1-KM) Events=1,531 Lymph node (CI) Events=499 Lymph node (1-KM) Events=499 Distant metastasis (CI) Events=3,112 Distant metast. (1-KM) Events=3,112 NOS (CI) Events=2,431 NOS (1-KM) Events=2,431 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 Figure 5a. Time to first progression of 37,228 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 215 (in solid cancers M only) estimated by cumulative incidence function (CI, solid line) accounting for death as competing risk and by inverse Kaplan-Meier estimate (1-KM, dashed line). The frequency of events may be underestimated due to underreporting. Type of progression Distant Any type (CI) Any type (1-KM) Local relapse (CI) Local relapse (1-KM) Lymph node (CI) Lymph node (1-KM) metastasis (CI) n=37,228 n=37,228 n=37,228 n=37,228 n=37,228 n=37,228 n=37,228 % % % % % % %....... 1 3.4 3.4.5.5.2.2 1.2 2 7.3 7.4 1.3 1.3.4.4 2.7 3.4.7 2. 2.1.6.7 4.1 4 12.9 13.4 2.5 2.7.8.8 5.2 5 15. 15.7 3. 3.3 1. 1.1 6.3 6 16.6 17.5 3.5 3.8 1.1 1.2 7.1 7 18.1 19.3 3.9 4.4 1.2 1.4 8. 8 19.3 2.7 4.3 4.9 1.4 1.6 8.7 9 2.6 22.3 4.8 5.6 1.5 1.8 9.6 21.6 23.7 5.1 6. 1.7 2..3 11 22.3 24.7 5.3 6.3 1.7 2.1.9 12 23.1 25.7 5.6 6.8 1.8 2.2 11.3 13 23.9 27. 5.9 7.4 1.9 2.4 11.9 14 24.5 27.9 6.1 7.8 2. 2.6 12.4 15 24.8 28.5 6.4 8.2 2.2 2.9 12.7

PROGRESSION ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 14 of 18 Type of progression Distant cont'd metast. (1- NOS (CI) NOS (1-KM) KM) n=37,228 n=37,228 n=37,228 % % %... 1 1.2 1.2 1.3 2 2.8 2.9 3. 3 4.2 4.1 4.4 4 5.5 5.2 5.5 5 6.7 5.9 6.4 6 7.6 6.5 7.2 7 8.7 7. 7.8 8 9.6 7.3 8.2 9.7 7.6 8.6 11.7 7.9 9.1 11 12.5 8.1 9.4 12 13.1 8.2 9.6 13 13.9 8.4 9.9 14 14.7 8.4. 15 15.2 8.5.1 Table 5b. Time to first progression of patients with prostate cancer for period 1998-215 (N=37,228).

PROGRESSION ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 15 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Progression type % Observed post-progression survival 1998-215 N=7,513 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 5c. Observed post-progression survival of 7,513 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 215. These 7,513 patients with documented progression events during their course of disease represent 19. % of the totally 39,615 evaluated cases (incl. M1, n=2,387, 6. %). Patients with cancer relapse documented via death certificates only were excluded (n=1,52, 3.8 %). Multiple progression types on different sites are included in the evaluation even when not occuring synchronously. The NOS (not otherwise specified) class is included under the condition, that it is the one and only progression type during the course of disease. Medical record documentation often lacks the linguistic severity to distinguish between local relapse, regional lymph node metastasis and distant spread in solid cancers. Frequently, the statement not specified is the only information in registries regarding relapse of the disease. The category Any type denotes all cases who suffered from at least one relapse during the course of disease (incl. primary M1-status). Although, the real number of relapsed patients is likely to be much higher. The accumulated percentage of patients with local relapse or distant metastasis exceeds the % value because patients are potientially considered in more than one subgroup. Type of progression Any type Local relapse Lymph node Distant metastasis NOS n=7,513 n=1,654 n=558 n=4,213 n=2,433 % % % % %..... 1 82.4 83.3 83.1 72. 9.5 2 69. 72.8 74.9 51.8 83.2 3 59. 65.4 66.2 37.2 77.6 4 51.9 59.3 56.9 28.3 72.9 5 46.6 55.7 49.5 22. 68.5 6 42.4 52.2 43.4 18.1 63.9 7 38.6 48.3 39.6 14.8 59.6 8 35.6 44.7 32.9 12.3 56.7 9 32.8 42.5.8 52.3.1 4.7 9.2 48.3 Table 5d. Observed post-progression survival of patients with prostate cancer for period 1998-215 (N=7,513). Type of progression Any type n=7,513.% Local relapse n=1,654 22.% Lymph node n=558 7.4% Distant metastasis n=4,213 56.1% NOS n=2,433 32.4%

PROGRESSION ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 16 of 18 ICD- C61: Malignant neoplasm of prostate Type of Progression: Distant metastasis % Observed post-progression survival by period of progression date 1988-215 N=5,346 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 5e. Observed post-progression (distant metastasis) survival of 5,346 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 215 by period of progression. Period of progression 1988-1997 1998-26 27+ n=741 n=1,6 n=2,975 % % %... 1 66.8 69.4 71.4 2 43.3 48.5 51.4 3 29.4 33.1 37.7 4 19.2 25. 28.8 5 14.4 19.4 22.4 6 11.3 16. 18.3 7 7.4 13.1 14.7 8 6.4.8 11.8 9 4.6 9.4 3.4 8. Table 5f. Observed post-progression (distant metastasis) survival of patients with prostate cancer for period 1988-215 by period of progression (N=5,346). Period of progression 1988-1997 n=741 13.9% 1998-26 n=1,6.5% 27+ n=2,975 55.6%

USAGE ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 17 of 18 Shortcuts MCR Munich Cancer Registry, Germany NCI National Cancer Institute, USA SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, USA UICC Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva DCO Death certificate only NA Not available NOS Not otherwise specified Death certificate provides the only notification to the registry. OS Overall/Observed survival Overall/Observed survival (Kaplan-Meier estimate) Date of entry: diagnosis Event: death from any cause RS Relative survival Survival compared to general population, ratio of observed to expected survival (Ederer II method), reflecting cancer specific survival AS Assembled survival Assembled chart of observed, expected, relative survival CS Conditional survival Survival probability under the condition of surviving a given period of time TTP Time to progression Time to first progression / relapse Date of entry: diagnosis Event: (progression/ relapse): first local-, lymph node recurrence, distant metastasis or unspecified progression 1-KM CI 1 minus Kaplan-Meier estimator ( inverse Kaplan-Meier estimator) Cumulative incidence Death as competing risk (according to Kalbfleisch und Prentice) PPS Post-progression survival Survival since first progression / relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate) Date of entry (progression / relapse): first local-, lymph node recurrence, distant metastasis or unspecified progression Event: death from any cause Recommended Citation Munich Cancer Registry. Survival ICD- C61: Prostate cancer [Internet]. 217 [updated 217 Aug 22; cited 217 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.tumorregister-muenchen.de/en/facts/surv/sc61 E-ICD--C61- Prostate-cancer-survival.pdf Copyright The content of the public web site provided by the Munich Cancer Registry is available worldwide and free of charge. All documents are free to download, utilize, copy, print-out and distribute, providing that the MCR is referenced. Disclaimer The Munich Cancer Registry reserves the right to not be responsible for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of the information provided. Liability claims regarding damage caused by the use of any information provided, including any kind of information which is incomplete or incorrect, will therefore be rejected.

INDEX ICD- C61: Prostate cancer Page 18 of 18 Fig./Tbl. Index of figures and tables Page 1a Relative survival by period of diagnosis (chart) 2 1b Survival by period of diagnosis (table) 2 1c Relative survival by year of diagnosis (chart) 3 1d Survival by year of diagnosis (table) 3 2a Survival of total cohort (chart) 5 2b Survival of total cohort (table) 5 3a Observed survival by age category (chart) 6 3b Relative survival by age category (chart) 6 3c Survival by age category (table) 7 4a Relative survival by TNM staging 1988+ (chart) 8 4b Survival by TNM staging 1988+ (table) 8 4c Relative survival by TNM staging 1998+ (chart) 4d Survival by TNM staging 1998+ (table) 4e Conditional survival by extent of disease (chart) 12 4f Conditional survival by extent of disease (table) 12 5a Time to first progression (chart) 13 5b Time to first progression (table) 13 5c Observed post-progression survival (chart) 15 5d Observed post-progression survival (table) 15 5e Observed post-progression survival by period of progression (chart) 16 5f Observed post-progression survival by period of progression (table) 16