CT or PET/CT for coronary artery disease

Similar documents
Hybrid cardiac imaging Advantages, limitations, clinical scenarios and perspectives for the future

Multisclice CT in combination with functional imaging for CAD. Temporal Resolution. Spatial Resolution. Temporal resolution = ½ of the rotation time

PET: quantification of perfusion and beyond

SPECT or PET for Cardiovascular Screening in High-Risk Patients

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Myocardial Perfusion: Positron Emission Tomography

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

PET myocard perfusion & viability Riemer Slart

Pearls & Pitfalls in nuclear cardiology

FFR-CT Not Ready for Primetime

Εξελίξεις και νέες προοπτικές στην καρδιαγγειακή απεικόνιση CT. Σταμάτης Κυρζόπουλος Ωνάσειο Καρδιοχειρουργικό Κέντρο

Debate Should we use FFR? I will say NO.

I have no financial disclosures

CT FFR: Are you ready to totally change the way you diagnose Coronary Artery Disease?

Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography (and some neat CT images)

FFR in Multivessel Disease

Combining Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning with SPECT/PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Fractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2. William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center

The Latest on CT Fractional Flow Reserve. Dimitris Mitsouras, Ph.D.

Coronary Artery Imaging. Suvipaporn Siripornpitak, MD Inter-hospital Conference : Rajavithi Hospital

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging: Its Use in the Era of Value-based Reimbursement

Current and Future Imaging Trends in Risk Stratification for CAD

State of the Art. Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging. ESC Congres Stockholm September 1, 2010 Frank E. Rademakers, MD, PhD, FESC

The best from Euro-Echo Ischemic heart disease. Fausto Rigo,FESC Department of Cardiology Mestre-Venezia Hospital,Italy

Disclosure Information

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

CASE from South Korea

Imaging ischemic heart disease: role of SPECT and PET. Focus on Patients with Known CAD

Welcome! To submit questions during the presentation: or Text:

CT Myocardial Perfusion: Is there Added Value to Coronary CT?

FFR-Guided PCI. 4 th Imaging and Physiology Summit October 29 th, 2010 Seoul, Korea. Stanford

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

FFR= Qs/Qn. Ohm s law R= P/Q Q=P/R

CT Perfusion. U. Joseph Schoepf, MD, FAHA, FSCBT MR, FSCCT Professor of Radiology, Medicine, and Pediatrics Director of Cardiovascular Imaging

Cardiology for the Practitioner Advanced Cardiac Imaging: Worth the pretty pictures?

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY of SOUTH CAROLINA

CT Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque. William Stanford MD Professor-Emeritus Radiology University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, IA

Validation of CT Perfusion Imaging Against Invasive Angiography and FFR on a 320-MDCT Scanner

MD F A F C A C MAS A N S C

FFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice

SPECT CT Current Status and Future Direction Nuclear Cardiology

Physiologic Assessment by Cardiac CT

FFR and intravascular imaging, which of which?

Malaysian Healthy Ageing Society

SPECT-CT: Τι πρέπει να γνωρίζει ο Καρδιολόγος

Recent Advances in Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac CT, and Cardiac MRI: Applications for CAD in the Era of Value-based Imaging

Imaging congestive heart failure: role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE USE IN THE CATH LAB BECAUSE ANGIOGRAPHY ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH!!!!!!!!

Σεμινάριο Ομάδων Εργασίας Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Σε ποιούς ασθενείς; ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΑΥΖΩΤΗΣ Επιστ. υπεύθυνος Αιμοδυναμικού Τμήματος, Βιοκλινική

CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE

Focus on Acute Coronary Syndromes

PCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry

Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography

The Final 10-Year Follow-up Results from the Bari Randomized Trial J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 49;1600-6

CARDIAC MULTIMODALITY IMAGING: Informing better decisions - or just costly pictures?

Optimal testing for coronary artery disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

Fractional Flow Reserve. A physiological approach to guide complex interventions

Dual Energy CT of the Heart: Perfusion and Beyond

Better CABGs vs Better PCI Devices

Failure of positive. Recanalization and CTO formation. TCFA rupture with (fatal) thrombotic occlusion. TCFA Lipid pool

Stress only Perfusion Imaging

Fractional Flow Reserve and instantaneous wave -free Ratio. Λάμπρος Κ. Μόσιαλος Επεμβατικός Καρδιολόγος ΓΝ Παπαγεωργίου

ROLE OF CORONARY PRESSURE & FFR IN MULTIVESSEL DISEASE

Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries

Detection Of Functional Significance of Coronary Stenoses Using Dynamic. Values Of Myocardial Blood Flow And Coronary Flow Reserve

DIAGNOSTIC TESTING IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE CHEST PAIN

Hybrid Imaging Improving Nuclear Cardiology Practice

Coronary interventions

Women and Coronary Artery Disease:

Imaging and heart failure

The 2016 NASCI Keynote: Trends in Utilization of Cardiac Imaging: The Coronary CTA Conundrum. David C. Levin, M.D.

Advanced Imaging MRI and CTA

Emerging role of PET in nuclear cardiology. Dr. Erick Alexánderson. Rosas

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

21st Annual Contemporary Therapeutic Issues in Cardiovascular Disease

Calcium scoring Clinical and prognostic value

Integrating IVUS, FFR, and Noninvasive Imaging to Optimize Outcomes. Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Fractional Flow Reserve and the Results of the FAME Study

Diffuse Disease and Serial Stenoses. Bernard De Bruyne Cardiovascular Center Aalst Belgium

Maria Angela S. Cruz-Anacleto, MD

Prognostic Value of Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE: STANDARD OF CARE

Cardiovascular Imaging Stress Echo

The Emerging Role of Cardiac CT in Cardiovascular Imaging. Anthony Gemignani, MD Vermont Cardiac Network April 28, 2016

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve from Anatomic Computed TOmographic Angiography: The DeFACTO Study

Is computed tomography angiography really useful in. of coronary artery disease?

Pushing the limits of cardiac CT. Steven Dymarkowski Radiology / Medical Imaging Research Centre

Hospital, 6 Lukon Road, Lukong Town, Changhua Shien, Taiwan 505, Taiwan.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Ca Score

State-of-the-Art SPECT/CT: Cardiac Imaging

Disclosures. Speaker s bureau: Research grant: Advisory Board: Servier International, Bayer, Merck Serono, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lupin

Optimal Method for Stenosis Assessment with CT

Coronary stenting: the appropriate use of FFR

How to Evaluate Microvascular Function and Angina. Myeong-Ho Yoon Ajou University Hospital

CARDIOLOGY GRAND ROUNDS

Potential recommendations for CT coronary angiography in athletes

Clinical case in perspective. Cases from Poland

Anatomy is Destiny, But Physiology is Here Today

Transcription:

CT or PET/CT for coronary artery disease Rotterdam 2012 Juhani Knuuti, MD, PhD, FESC Turku PET Centre University of Turku Turku, Finland Juhani.knuuti@utu.fi Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Disclosure: Juhani Knuuti, M.D. Juhani Knuuti, M.D. has financial interests to disclose. Potential conflicts of interest have been resolved. Research Support / Grants Stock/Equity (any amount) Consulting Employment Speakers Bureau / Honoraria None None Lantheus None Philips Research contracts (institutional): Orion Pharma, Turku Imanet Ltd, GE Healthcare, GSK, Merck, Bayer-Schering, Novartis, Lundbeck, Roche; Lantheus Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital 2

Imaging and CAD Current main trends From ischemic cascade to CAD cascade From diagnosis of CAD to guidance of therapy Novel imaging applications Quantification Imaging of vulnerable plaque Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Paradigm shift 1: From ischemic to CAD cascade Preclinical atherosclerosis Non-obstructive CAD hypoperfusion Myocardial perfusion metabolic alterations diastolic dysfunction systolic dysfunction ECG-Changes angina Signs of ischaemia Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Multislice CT vs. Myocardial Perfusion Regional comparison in 140 patients Data from Schuijf et al. 2006, Di Carli et al. 2006, Hacker et al. 2005, and Rispler et al. 2006

MDCT findings in patients with normal SPECT perfusion imaging result Werkhoven JM, et al Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 1;101(1):40-5. Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

CT angiography Curved MPR reconstructions of the major coronary vessels Case LP LAD >50% LCX RCA 30-40% >50% CT Acquisition: Premedication: Metoprolol 10 mg i.v. HR 46/min Acquisition: Prospective step-and-shoot protocol, ma 650, 120 kv Contrast: Iomeron 400mg/ml 68 ml Radiation dose 7.4 msv Case:LP

PET perfusion imaging during stress Displayed as fused volume rendered images scaled to absolute scale 0-3.5 ml/g/min Normal perfusion: above 2.5 ml/g/min: yellow or red 3.5 ml/g/min 0.0 ml/g/min PET Acquisition: Injected Dose: 1100 MBq O-15-water Stress: Adenosine 140 µg/min/kg for 6.5 min Acquisition time: dynamic 4.5 min Radiation dose 0.9 msv Case:LP

Invasive angiography + FFR Case LP Right 48% FFR: 0.86 (normal) Left 46% FFR:? 60% FFR: 0.92 (normal) FFR = Fractional flow reserve invasive measurement of the stenosis functional gradient during adenosine infusion Case:LP

Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT n = 12 000 pts 10 8 6 P < 0.001 7,4 4 2 0,6 0 normal abnormal Iskander S et al. JACC 1998;32:57

Additional prognostic value of CT and perfusion imaging N=541 Van Verkhoven et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53: 623 32

Imaging and CAD Current main trends From ischemic cascade to CAD cascade From diagnosis of CAD to guidance of therapy Novel imaging applications Quantification Imaging of vulnerable plaque Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Paradigm shift 2: From diagnosis to guidance of therapy Anatomy (Obstructive CAD) Flow-Limiting (Perfusion, FFR) Optimal Medical Treatment Complete Functional Revascularization and optimal medical treatment Noninvasive function: Perfusion, WMA Hachamovitch Circulation 2003;107:2900 COURAGE NEJM 2007;356:1503 COURAGE Circulation 2008;117:1283 Invasive function: FFR DEFER JACC 2007;49:2105 FAME NEJM 2009;360:213 FAME JACC 2010;56:177 Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Functional consequences of stenoses LAD D1 LAD D1 Turku PET Centre, Finland

Invasive Anatomy vs. Functional Consequences 1.0 Pressure-derived erived FFR 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 N = 2334 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Angiographic Diameter Stenosis (%) Wijns, de Bruyne, Vanhoenacker, JNC 2007;93:856-61

Tonino et al. FAME

CT angiography Curved MPR reconstructions of the major coronary vessels Case LP LAD >50% LCX RCA 30-40% >50% CT Acquisition: Premedication: Metoprolol 10 mg i.v. HR 46/min Acquisition: Prospective step-and-shoot protocol, ma 650, 120 kv Contrast: Iomeron 400mg/ml 68 ml Radiation dose 7.4 msv Case:LP

PET perfusion imaging during stress Displayed as fused volume rendered images scaled to absolute scale 0-3.5 ml/g/min Normal perfusion: above 2.5 ml/g/min: yellow or red 3.5 ml/g/min 0.0 ml/g/min PET Acquisition: Injected Dose: 1100 MBq O-15-water Stress: Adenosine 140 µg/min/kg for 6.5 min Acquisition time: dynamic 4.5 min Radiation dose 0.9 msv Case:LP

Multivessel disease: What is the culprit lesion? LAD RCA C E FFR=0.94 FFR=0.54 D F 3.5 FFR=0.63 0 ml/g/min D1 Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Multivessel disease: What is the culprit lesion? Case: stenoses in all major vessels; RCA is culprit RCA LCX LAD Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Microvascular disease Absolute perfusion decreased but no epicardial disease Relative perfusion Absolute perfusion Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Hybrid noninvasive (PET/CT) vs. Hybrid invasive (ICA + FFR) Sensitivity Specificity PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%) MDCT 75 95 76 94 91 PET 94 93 77 98 93 MDCT-PET hybrid 95 99 96 99 98 100 Vessel analysis in patients Figure 3: Vessel with Analysis intermediate against ICA likelihood +FFR of CAD, N=107 percen ntage 90 80 70 60 MDCT 50 PET 40 MDCT-PET hybrid 30 20 10 0 PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%) MDCT 76 94 91 PET 77 98 93 MDCT-PET hybrid 96 99 98 Kajander et al Circulation 2010 Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Challenges and solutions of perfusion imaging Challenge Solution LM disease? Balanced 3 vessel disease? Multivessel disease? Anatomical location? Non-ischemic CAD? Microvascular disease? Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Challenges and solutions of ischemia imaging Challenge LM disease Balanced 3 vessel disease Multivessel disease Anatomical location Non-ischemic CAD Solution Hybrid Hybrid Hybrid Microvascular disease / Hybrid Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Impact of hybrid imaging on downstream resource utilization 100% p<0.001 96% 86% 80% Revasculari isations 60% 40% 20% 45% 39% NEJM 2010 USA N=400 000 36% GER N=840 000 0% CATH rate CAD yield Per CATH REVASC Per CATH Eur Heart J 2011 Jul 30. Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Imaging and CAD Current main trends From ischemic cascade to CAD cascade From diagnosis of CAD to guidance of therapy Novel imaging applications Quantification Imaging of vulnerable plaque Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Challenges and solutions of CAD/ishchemia imaging Challenge LM disease Balanced 3 vessel disease Multivessel disease Anatomical location Non-ischemic CAD Microvascular disease Solution Hybrid Quantification Quantification Hybrid Hybrid Quantification/ Hybrid Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Quantification of myocardial perfusion Which patients will benefit? Balanced 3 vessel or multivessel disease Culprit lesion vs. non-culprit lesion in multi vessel disease Early changes in coronary dysfunction Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Absolute flow vs Relative flow Kajander et al Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Absolute flow is as good as flow reserve! Joutsiniemi et al (Circ Imaging) University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

Imaging and CAD Current main trends From ischemic cascade to CAD cascade From diagnosis of CAD to guidance of therapy Novel imaging applications Quantification Imaging of vulnerable plaque Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi University Turku University Hospital

MDCT Characterization of Coronary Plaques Motoyama J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 LAD LAD LCX Left main

Plaque characterization using CT vs. Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Van Verkhoven et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53: 623 32 N=541

MDCT Characterization of Coronary Plaques - Prognosis Large low attenuation plaque area Positive remodeling Spotty calcification 15 ACS in 1059 patients Motoyama J Am Coll Cardiol 2009

Dual gated 18 F-FDG PET/CT of coronary arteries in ACS patients CTA CTA-PET Fusion Acute LAD plaque rupture Myocardial FDG uptake supressed by low carbohydrate, high fat diet Lankinen at Turku al PET ICNC Centre, 2011 Finland

Dual gated 18 F-FDG FDG PET/CT of coronary arteries in ACS patients 39 year old man Risk factors of CAD: Smoking Family history + 5 days of UAP ECG: lateral T-inversion TNT + LCX subtotal occlusion stented TBR ratio 4.2 Turku PET Centre, Finland Lankinen EHJ 2011 (abstract) Turku PET Centre, Finland

Dual gated 18 F-FDG FDG PET/CT of coronary arteries in ACS patients 20 ACS (non-stemi or UAP) patients Dual-gated 18 F FDG PET/CT (3d after onset of symptoms) High-fat diet intervention to suppress myocardial uptake (Williams AJR 2008) Visual coronary FDG uptake in 80% of patients (3 prior to intervention) TBR 3.2±1.3 (range 1.8-5.4) Lankinen EHJ 2011 (abstract) Turku Turku PET PET Centre, Centre, Finland Finland

Concerns on sequential / hybrid imaging for CAD Complicated for patients (sequential) Logistic challenges (hybrid) Higher work load Non-standardized image analysis Radiation burden Lacking evidence and indications Costs and cost-effectivenes

Comparison of risks for fatal event 1000 1000 800 600 400 The risk per 10 000 200 0 140 119 2 16 9 0,5 15 1 1 12 5 6 1 23 Since upper limit of lifetime risk of any imaging test was 23 per 10 000 only 2.3% of the events need to be prevented to completely cancel Risk of fatal cardiac event (10-years) Aspirin, lifetime risk of fatal bleeding Motor vehicle accident Pedestrian accident Drowning Bicycling Calcium score CT angiography Dobutamine stress echocardiography (CE) Dobutamine stress CMR Adenosine contrast enhanced CMR Exercise SPECT perfusion imaging Dipyridamole SPECT perfusion imaging Adenosine PET perfusion imaging Invasive angiography the risk of imaging.