The Regulation of Cathepsin K Gene Expression

Similar documents
Deposition of Bone by the Osteoblasts. Bone is continually being deposited by osteoblasts, and it is continually being resorbed where osteoclasts are

silent epidemic,. (WHO),

Principles of Genetics and Molecular Biology

Interleukin-6; pathogenesis and treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases

Osteoclasts- What Do They Do and How Do They Do It? Prof. Steven L. Teitelbaum

HORMONES (Biomedical Importance)

Generation of post-germinal centre myeloma plasma B cell.

RAS Genes. The ras superfamily of genes encodes small GTP binding proteins that are responsible for the regulation of many cellular processes.

INTERACTION DRUG BODY

Osteoporosis and its Association with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prednisolone Therapy

Bone Cell Precursors and the Pathophysiology of Bone Loss

Lecture 7: Signaling Through Lymphocyte Receptors

Silent Killer: Osteoporosis

Biochemistry #01 Bone Formation Dr. Nabil Bashir Farah Banyhany

Receptors Functions and Signal Transduction- L4- L5

Chapter 15: Signal transduction

Computational Biology I LSM5191

CYTOKINE RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

IRA-International Journal of Applied Sciences ISSN Vol. 03 Issue 02 (May, 2016) Paper DOI:

Who manipulates who in dysregulated mineralised tissue resorption? Dr Gurå Therese Bergkvist MRCVS

Index. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 32 (2006) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

MECHANISM AND MODE OF HORMONE ACTION. Some definitions. Receptor: Properties of receptors. PRESENTED BY MBUNKUR GLORY NKOSI.

Osteoclast Activity Assay Substrate

Lipids and Membranes

Comment les cellules osseuses communiquent entre elles. Gérard Friedlander Journées UPA 2011

Cell signaling. How do cells receive and respond to signals from their surroundings?

Regulation of Osteoclast Differentiation

Pathophysiology of Postmenopausal & Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis. March 15, 2016 Bone ECHO Kate T Queen, MD

CHAPTER 2. Literature Review. Bone Homeostasis. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Composition of bone

By the name of Allah

Histone Deacetylase 3 and Histone Deacetylase 7 Have. Opposite Effects on Osteoclast Differentiation

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Rama Nada. - Mousa Al-Abbadi. 1 P a g e

T cell maturation. T-cell Maturation. What allows T cell maturation?

Basis and Clinical Applications of Interferon

Plasma membranes. Plasmodesmata between plant cells. Gap junctions between animal cells Cell junctions. Cell-cell recognition

Subject Index. Bcl-2, apoptosis regulation Bone marrow, polymorphonuclear neutrophil release 24, 26

Osteoprotegerin ligand and osteoprotegerin: novel implications for osteoclast biology and bone metabolism

BONE REMODELLING. Tim Arnett. University College London. Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology

March 19 th Batool Aqel

TNFSF13B tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 13b NF-kB pathway cluster, Enrichment Score: 3.57

Ayman Mesleh & Leen Alnemrawi. Bayan Abusheikha. Faisal

Mechanisms Underlying the Regulation and Functions of HDAC7 in Osteoclast Differentiation

Molecular Cell Biology - Problem Drill 19: Cell Signaling Pathways and Gene Expression

Chapter 11. Cell Communication

Cell Communication. Local and Long Distance Signaling

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. PowerPoint Lectures for Biology, Seventh Edition. Lectures by Chris Romero. Neil Campbell and Jane Reece

2013 W. H. Freeman and Company. 12 Signal Transduction

Fructose Upregulates FGF23 Expression In MC3T3 Pre-osteoblasts

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Overview: The Cellular Internet

Cell Signaling part 2

THE GROWING GAP IN OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT

T-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:

T-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:

The endoplasmic reticulum is a network of folded membranes that form channels through the cytoplasm and sacs called cisternae.

Chapter 9. Cellular Signaling

Assessment and Treatment of Osteoporosis Professor T.Masud

Endocrine secretion cells secrete substances into the extracellular fluid

Cell Biology Lecture 9 Notes Basic Principles of cell signaling and GPCR system

Cell Communication. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Regulation and enzymatic basis of bone resorption by human osteoclasts

Receptor mediated Signal Transduction

Space radiation and osteoclastogenesis:the effects of radiation and microgravity on bone resorption:

Osteoclast: Origin and Differentiation

Butyrate induces cell apoptosis through activation of JNK MAP kinase pathway in human colon cancer RKO cells.

About This Chapter. Hormones The classification of hormones Control of hormone release Hormone interactions Endocrine pathologies Hormone evolution

IL-17 in health and disease. March 2014 PSO13-C051n

Thanks to: Signal Transduction. BCB 570 "Signal Transduction" 4/8/08. Drena Dobbs, ISU 1. An Aging Biologist s. One Biologist s Perspective

Chapter 17. Lecture and Animation Outline

Peggers Super Summaries Basic Sciences Bone

Bio 111 Study Guide Chapter 11 Cell Communication

TITLE: Breast Tumor-Generated Type 1 Collagen Breakdown Fragments Act as Matrikines to Drive Osteolysis

Intracellular MHC class II molecules promote TLR-triggered innate. immune responses by maintaining Btk activation

Insulin Resistance. Biol 405 Molecular Medicine

Enzyme-coupled Receptors. Cell-surface receptors 1. Ion-channel-coupled receptors 2. G-protein-coupled receptors 3. Enzyme-coupled receptors

The Skeletal System:Bone Tissue

A. Major parts 1. Nucleus 2. Cytoplasm a. Contain organelles (see below) 3. Plasma membrane (To be discussed in Cellular Transport Lecture)

Goals and Challenges of Communication. Communication and Signal Transduction. How Do Cells Communicate?

Modélisation par éléments finis des effets des médicaments sur le remodelage osseux : Approche mécanobiologique

Awaisheh. Mousa Al-Abbadi. Abdullah Alaraj. 1 Page

Clinical Biochemistry

Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)-based studies of receptor dynamics in living cells with Berthold s Mithras

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology. Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Endocrine Regulation of Calcium and Phosphate Metabolism

Signal Transduction: Information Metabolism. Chem 454: Regulatory Mechanisms in Biochemistry University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire

BIOLOGY. Cell Communication. Outline. Evolution of Signaling. Overview: Cellular Messaging. Local and Long-Distance Signaling

Lecture 15. Signal Transduction Pathways - Introduction

Crosstalk between Adiponectin and IGF-IR in breast cancer. Prof. Young Jin Suh Department of Surgery The Catholic University of Korea

Bone Remodeling & Repair Pathologies

Basics of Signal Transduction. Ebaa M Alzayadneh, PhD

G-Protein Signaling. Introduction to intracellular signaling. Dr. SARRAY Sameh, Ph.D

Cell Signaling (part 1)

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Molecular Cell Biology Problem Drill 16: Intracellular Compartment and Protein Sorting

Chapter 5 Control of Cells by Chemical Messengers

General Principles of Endocrine Physiology

Cell Communication. Cell Communication. Communication between cells requires: ligand: the signaling molecule

Effects of Second Messengers

Summary of Endomembrane-system

Transcription:

The Regulation of Cathepsin K Gene Expression BRUCE R. TROEN Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center & Research Service, Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and Geriatrics Institute, Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33125, USA ABSTRACT: Cathepsin K is essential for normal bone resorption. Osteoclasts synthesize and secrete cathepsin K into the extracellular compartment at the attachment site between osteoclasts and the bone surface, wherein the organic matrix is subsequently degraded by cathepsin K. RANKL, NFAT, Mitf, and various components of AP-1 enhance osteoclast formation and bone resorption, whereas IFN-, calcitonin, estradiol, and calcium inhibit it. These agents appear to act correspondingly to alter cathepsin K mrna and protein expression in order to stimulate and suppress the osteoclast s resorbing potential. RANKL signaling via the calcineurin-calcium-nfat signaling cascade plays a significant role in the regulation of cathepsin K expression. Activation via p38 and the micropthalmia transcription factor also enhances cathepsin K expression. Future studies will be needed to elucidate the relative roles of various signaling pathways at different stages of osteoclast formation and activation and to determine whether genetically disrupting these pathways can modulate bone resorption with or without impeding other osteoclast functions. KEYWORDS: cathepsin K; osteoclast; RANK ligand; NFAT; bone resorption INTRODUCTION Osteoporosis is one of the leading causes of morbidity in the elderly, resulting in over 1 million fractures each year and increased mortality for those with hip fractures. Osteoporosis is characterized by a progressive loss of total bone mass and bone density due to an imbalance between osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation. Normal bone resorption and remodeling critically depend upon the synthesis and secretion of cathepsin K by osteoclasts (for reviews, please see Refs. 1 3). Humans with mutations in the cathepsin Address for correspondence: Bruce R. Troen, M.D., Miami VA Medical Center, 11 GRC, 1201 NW 16th Street, Miami, FL 33125. Voice: 305-575-3388; fax: 305-575-3365. e-mail: troen@miami.edu Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1068: 165 172 (2006). C 2006 New York Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.018 165

166 ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES K (CTSK) gene exhibit skeletal abnormalities (pycnodysostosis), and mice that are completely CTSK-deficient develop osteopetrosis. Therefore, CTSK plays an important role in the development of osteoporosis. Indeed, a number of pharmaceutical firms are actively developing inhibitors of cathepsin K enzymatic activity and are conducting clinical trials to use these agents as an antiresorptive to treat osteoporosis. Despite these clinically translational studies, the regulation of CTSK expression during osteoclast differentiation and in active bone-resorbing osteoclasts is incompletely understood. However, in the past several years, an increasing number of studies have begun to delineate the mechanisms underlying the transcription of the CTSK gene. Here we briefly review the progress made in understanding the regulation of CTSK gene expression. REGULATION OF CTSK EXPRESSION The regulation of bone resorption involves a complicated set of hormonal and/or cytokine interactions that initially stimulate osteoblasts and stromal cells, which then elaborate factors that signal osteoclasts to degrade bone (for reviews see Refs. 1,4 6). Key to understanding the regulation of cathepsin K expression is that many of the agents that have been shown to induce osteoclast formation and activation or to inhibit osteoclast activity enhance and suppress, respectively, cathepsin K gene expression. The receptor activator of NF- B ligand (RANKL) plays a critical role in osteoclast differentiation and activation. 7 9 RANKL is a membrane-bound factor that is produced by osteoblasts and stromal cells in response to a variety of signals. RANKL binds to the cytoplasmic membrane receptor RANK (receptor activator of NF- B), which is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily, and subsequently induces both osteoclast differentiation and activation. RANKL stimulates CTSK mrna and protein expression in human osteoclasts. 10 We have demonstrated that RANKL acutely stimulates cathepsin K mrna expression in isolated mature rat osteoclasts. 11 In addition, as bone marrow-derived osteoclasts differentiate and fuse, they produce increasing amounts of cathepsin K. 11 RANKL also enhances CTSK mrna expression in murine myeloid RAW 264.7 cells concomitant with induction toward an osteoclastic phenotype. 12 This phenomenon is both concentration- and time-dependent over a 7-day period 13 and also occurs at earlier times. 14 TNF-, which is a member of the same superfamily of ligands as RANKL, also stimulates CTSK mrna expression in pre-osteoclasts. 15 A large number of agents regulate the production of RANKL by osteoblasts and stromal cells. 1 Stimulators include vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, TNF-, glucocorticoids, interleukins 1 (IL-1) and 11 (IL-11), thyroid hormone, prostaglandin E2, lipopolysaccharide, fibroblast growth factor-2, histamine, insulin-like growth factor-1, histamine, and low gravity. Inhibitors of RANKL expression include estro-

TROEN: REGULATION OF CATHEPSIN K GENE EXPRESSION 167 gen and transforming growth factor-. Consequently, these agents indirectly exert corresponding stimulatory and inhibitory effects upon cathepsin K expression. RANKL appears to stimulate the transcription of the cathepsin K gene via a number of mechanisms. An early and proximal event in RANKL-mediated signaling involves activation of TRAF6 (TNF receptor-associated factor 6), which is a critical adaptor molecule for the cognate receptor of RANKL. Overexpression of TRAF6 stimulates cathepsin K promotor activity, and RANKL stimulation of cathepsin K promotor activity is inhibited by the overexpression of dominant negative TRAF6. 14 More distally in the signaling pathway, Matsumoto et al. demonstrated that RANKL leads to the phosphorylation of NFAT2 by p38, thereby inducing translocation of NFAT2 into the nucleus and subsequent transactivation of the human CTSK promotor. 16 Overexpression of MKK6, which enhanced p38 activity also stimulated CTSK gene expression and promotor activity. This phosphorylation of NFAT2 contrasts with the classical paradigm whereby calcineurin dephosphorylates both NFAT1 and NFAT2, leading to nuclear translocation and subsequent promotor activation of a spectrum of genes. 17,18 However, it is possible that both dephosphorylation and phosphorylation of different moieties of NFAT2 may induce translocation and subsequent transactivation of transcription. We have shown that RANKL treatment induces NFAT2 mrna expression in pre-osteoclasts. 19 Cyclosporine, which inhibits the phosphatase activity of calcineurin, thereby inhibiting NFAT activation, suppresses the stimulation of cathepsin K mrna expression by RANKL. 14 Furthermore, inhibitors of calcium signaling, such as BAPTA-AM and the calcium ionophore, A23187, reduce RANKL-induced cathepsin K mrna expression, NFAT2 overexpression markedly stimulates the rat cathepsin K promotor, and NFAT2 binds to a region of the rat cathepsin K promotor within 100 bp of the transcription initiation site. 14 Transfection of pre-osteoclasts with sirna specific to NFAT2 markedly reduces the induction of cathepsin K mrna by RANKL (Troen et al., unpublished results). RANKL treatment of cells also induces phosphorylation of the micropthalmia transcription factor (Mitf) via p38. 20 Mutations in the micropthalmia (mi) gene selectively affect osteoclast development and/or function and lead to osteopetrosis. 21,22 Mitf is the mi gene product and is a member of the helixloop-helix (HLH) leucine zipper family and directly regulates cathepsin K gene transcription. Dominant negative mutations of Mitf exhibit osteopetrosis and lack cathepsin K mrna and protein. 22 Overexpression of wild-type Mitf or TFE3, a member of the same transcription factor family, in cultured osteoclasts significantly enhanced cathepsin K expression. Mitf binds to three E-box motifs in the human CTSK promotor, of which mutation of any one significantly impairs stimulation of promotor activity by Mitf or TFE3. 22 In addition, both Mitf and PU.1 synergistically potentiated NFAT2 stimulation of human CTSK promotor activity. 16 Interestingly, osteoclasts that are null for both p21 and p27 fail to exhibit the marked stimulation of cathepsin K mrna

168 ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES by RANKL. 23 Since p21 and p27 are cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors that appear to modulate the activity of HLH transcription factors, the authors hypothesize that p21 and p27 regulate cathepsin K expression via Mitf. Additional agents active in bone physiology stimulate cathepsin K expression. Retinoic acid can increase transcription of cathepsin K in isolated mature rabbit osteoclasts. 24 Extracellular matrix proteins that bind to osteoclast integrins, such as collagen type I, fibronectin, vitronectin, and osteopontin increased cathepsin K mrna expression. 25 Carbaprostacyclin, which is a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta/beta (PPAR / ), induced cathepsin K mrna expression in mature rabbit osteoclasts concomitantly with bone resorption. 26 Antisense oligonucleotide to the PPAR / blocked the response to carbaprostacyclin. Intermittent mechanical stretching of mature osteoclasts stimulated cathepsin K mrna expression along with bone resorption. 27 Physiological inhibitors of osteoclast differentiation and activation can also directly suppress cathepsin K expression. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) inhibited cathepsin K expression in purified rabbit osteoclasts. 28 Estrogen inhibited bone resorption by isolated rabbit osteoclasts and also downregulated cathepsin K mrna. 29 In calvarial culture, estradiol suppressed cathepsin K mrna expression and cathepsin K activity in response to PTH, IL-1, IL-6, TNF-. 30 Calvarial cultures from ovariectomized mice exhibited enhanced synthesis of cathepsin K, likely due to an indirect effect mediated by increased expression of RANKL by osteoblasts. Interferon- (INF- ) inhibits cathepsin K mrna and protein expression in murine osteoclasts, while IL-1 stimulated cathepsin K expression. 31 These same investigators were unable to observe a significant effect of either TNF- or IL-6 on cathepsin K expression. We have also demonstrated that INF- also inhibits the stimulation of cathepsin K mrna and protein expression by RANKL in the preosteoclast RAW 264.7 cell line. 13 Sodium butyrate and trichostain, which are both histone deacetylase inhibitors, reduced the stimulation of cathepsin K by RANKL. 32 Members of the AP-1 family of transcription factors also regulate cathepsin K transcription. A mouse homologue of Jun dimerization protein 2 activates the cathepsin K promotor in transient transfections of mouse preosteoclast RAW cells. 33 Overexpression of junb stimulates cathepsin K promotor activity and also potentiates the stimulation by NFAT2. 14 CONCLUSION Therefore, activators and inhibitors of osteoclast bone resorption act, at least in part, through the stimulation and/or inhibition of cathepsin K gene expression. Some of these known and potential regulators of cathepsin expression are depicted in FIGURE 1. RANKL, NFAT, Mitf, and various components of AP-1 enhance osteoclast formation and bone resorption, whereas IFN-, calcitonin,

TROEN: REGULATION OF CATHEPSIN K GENE EXPRESSION 169 FIGURE 1. Regulation of cathepsin K expression. The osteoclast adheres tightly to bone, in part via binding of the v 3 integrin to the extracellular matrix proteins. The extracellular compartment is acidified by the H + -ATPase proton pump that actively transports H + ions produced by the action of carbonic anhydrase (CAII) in the cell. Chloride channels (CIC-7) maintain electrical balance within the cell by extruding Cl ions into the resorption lacuna. Cathepsin K and other matrix metalloproteineases (MMPs) are transported from the endoplasmic reticulum within lysosomes and other secretory vesicles and then released into the resorption lacuna. Agents that stimulate the osteoclast to produce increased amounts of cathepsin K include RANKL, NFAT, Mitf, TNF, PU.1, AP-1, TFE3 (a member of the microphthalmia transcription factor family), retinoic acid (RA), IL-1, peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor / (PPAR / ), stretching, and extracellular matrix proteins (ECM). Inhibitors of cathepsin K expression include estrogen, interferon- (IFN- ), osteoprotegerin, trichostatin A (TSA), sodium butyrate (NaB). (Adapted from reference 1, with permission.) estradiol, and calcium inhibit it. These agents appear to act correspondingly to alter cathepsin K gene and protein expression in order to stimulate and suppress the osteoclast s resorbing potential. However, it is not known whether the regulation of cathepsin K gene expression is inextricably linked with osteoclast formation and activation. It would be intriguing to investigate the possibility of genetically enhancing or reducing cathepsin K gene transcription without facilitating or impeding other osteoclast functions. Furthermore, while multiple RANKL-associated signaling cascades and nuclear-binding factors play a role in cathepsin K gene expression, additional studies are needed to determine whether specific pathways and transcriptional stimulators preferentially act

170 ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES at different stages during osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption by mature osteoclasts. Such investigations will both enhance our understanding of osteoclast function and bone resorption and potentially provide new targets for developing therapies for osteoporosis treatment. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Troen is supported by grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs (Merit Review) and the Indian Trail Foundation and also receives support from the Miami VA Geriatrics, Research, Education, and Clinical Center and the Gerontology and Geriatrics Division at the Miller School of Medicine at University of Miami. REFERENCES 1. TROEN, B.R. 2004. The role of cathepsin K in normal bone resorption. Drug News Perspect. 17: 19 28. 2. YASUDA, Y., J. KALETA & D. BROMME. 2005. The role of cathepsins in osteoporosis and arthritis: rationale for the design of new therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57: 973 993. 3. MOTYCKOVA, G.& D.E. FISHER. 2002. Pycnodysostosis: role and regulation of cathepsin K in osteoclast function and human disease. Curr. Mol. Med. 2: 407 421. 4. TROEN, B.R. 2003. Molecular mechanisms underlying osteoclast formation and activation. Exp. Gerontol. 38: 605 614. 5. KATAGIRI, T.& N. TAKAHASHI. 2002. Regulatory mechanisms of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Oral Dis. 8: 147 159. 6. TAKAYANAGI, H. 2005. Mechanistic insight into osteoclast differentiation in osteoimmunology. J. Mol. Med. 83: 170 179. 7. LACEY, D.L. et al. 1998. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 93: 165 176. 8. SIMONET, W.S. et al. 1997. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density [see comments]. Cell 89: 309 319. 9. YASUDA, H. et al. 1998. Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 3597 3602. 10. SHALHOUB, V. et al. 1999. Osteoprotegerin and osteoprotegerin ligand effects on osteoclast formation from human peripheral blood mononuclear cell precursors. J. Cell Biochem. 72: 251 261. 11. CORISDEO, S. et al. 2001. New insights into regulation of cathepsin K gene expression by osteoprotegerin ligand. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 285: 335 339. 12. HSU, H. et al. 1999. Tumor necrosis factor receptor family member RANK mediates osteoclast differentiation and activation induced by osteoprotegerin ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 3540 3545.

TROEN: REGULATION OF CATHEPSIN K GENE EXPRESSION 171 13. PANG, M. et al. 2005. RANK ligand and interferon gamma differentially regulate cathepsin gene expression in pre-osteoclastic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 328: 756 763. 14. TROEN, B.R. et al. 2005. c-jun Suppresses and JunB Enhances the stimulation of Cathepsin K promoter activity by NFAT2 in RAW 264.7 Cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 20: S372. 15. KOMINE, M. et al. 2001. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha cooperates with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappab ligand in generation of osteoclasts in stromal cell-depleted rat bone marrow cell culture. Bone 28: 474 483. 16. MATSUMOTO, M. et al. 2004. Essential role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in cathepsin K gene expression during osteoclastogenesis through association of NFATc1 and PU.1. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 45969 45979. 17. MACIAN, F., C. LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ & A. RAO. 2001. Partners in transcription: NFAT and AP-1. Oncogene 20: 2476 2489. 18. IM, S.H.& A. RAO. 2004. Activation and deactivation of gene expression by Ca2+/calcineurin-NFAT-mediated signaling. Mol. Cells 18: 1 9. 19. ZHU, L.L. et al. 2004. RANK-L induces the expression of NFATc1, but not of NFkappaB subunits during osteoclast formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 326: 131 135. 20. MANSKY, K.C. et al. 2002. Microphthalmia transcription factor is a target of the p38 MAPK pathway in response to receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 11077 11083. 21. WEILBAECHER, K.N. et al. 1998. Age-resolving osteopetrosis: a rat model implicating microphthalmia and the related transcription factor TFE3. J. Exp. Med. 187: 775 785. 22. MOTYCKOVA, G. et al. 2001. Linking osteopetrosis and pycnodysostosis: regulation of cathepsin K expression by the microphthalmia transcription factor family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5798 5803. 23. SANKAR, U.et al. 2004. RANKL coordinates cell cycle withdrawal and differentiation in osteoclasts through the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27kip1 and p21cip1. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19: 1339 1348. 24. SANESHIGE, S. et al. 1995. Retinoic acid directly stimulates osteoclastic bone resorption and gene expression of cathepsin K/OC-2. Biochem. J. 309: 721 724. 25. UEMURA, T., Y.K. LIU & Y. KUBOKI. 2000. Preliminary communication. MRNA expression of MT1-MMP, MMP-9, cathepsin K, and TRAP in highly enriched osteoclasts cultured on several matrix proteins and ivory surfaces. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64: 1771 1773. 26. MANO, H. et al. 2000. Cloning and function of rabbit peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor delta/beta in mature osteoclasts. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 8126 8132. 27. KURATA, K. et al. 2001. Mechanical strain effect on bone-resorbing activity and messenger RNA expressions of marker enzymes in isolated osteoclast culture. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16: 722 730. 28. WITTRANT, Y.et al. 2002. Osteoprotegerin differentially regulates protease expression in osteoclast cultures. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293: 38 44. 29. MANO, H. et al. 1996. Mammalian mature osteoclasts as estrogen target cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 223: 637 642. 30. FURUYAMA,N.&Y.FUJISAWA. 2000. Regulation of collagenolytic cysteine protease synthesis by estrogen in osteoclasts. Steroids 65: 371 378.

172 ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 31. KAMOLMATYAKUL, S., W. CHEN & Y.P. LI. 2001. Interferon-gamma down-regulates gene expression of cathepsin K in osteoclasts and inhibits osteoclast formation. J. Dent. Res. 80: 351 355. 32. RAHMAN, M.M. et al. 2003. Two histone deacetylase inhibitors, trichostatin A and sodium butyrate, suppress differentiation into osteoclasts but not into macrophages. Blood 101: 3451 3459. 33. KAWAIDA, R. et al. 2003. Jun dimerization protein 2 (JDP2), a member of the AP-1 family of transcription factor, mediates osteoclast differentiation induced by RANKL. J. Exp. Med. 197: 1029 1035.