Effect of Different Micronutrients on Turmeric Variety Suranjana in Terai Region of West Bengal, India

Similar documents
Influence of Different Planting Material and Major Nutrient Application on Yield Attributes of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

Effect of Micronutrients Application on Availability of Zn, Fe and B of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) in Inceptisol

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)

Evaluation of Suitable Nutrient Management on Dual Purpose Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Crop under New Alluvial Zone (NAZ) of West Bengal, India

EFFECTS OF ZINC AND BORON ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) IN MUSTARD-MAIZE CROPPING SEQUENCE

EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF ZINC AND IRON ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (Allium cepa L.) Abstract

EVALUATION OF SOME TURMERIC GENOTYPES IN TERAI REGION OF WEST BENGAL

Yield and quality of cumin as influenced by FYM enriched micronutrients

UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY WHEAT AS INFLUENCED BY LONG- TERM PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION

Effect of Phosphorous and Zinc Fertilisation on the Productivity of Transplanted Aromatic Rice

Effect of Boron and Sulphur Application on Plant Growth and Yield Attributes of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Nutrient Use Strategies for Coconut Based Cropping System in Onattukara Sandy Tract, Kerala

Effect of N, Zn and Fe application on N, P, K content and total uptake in parmal rice (Oryza sativa L.)

e- ISSN: p- ISSN: X

Assessment of Secondary and Micro Nutrient Status under Long-Term Fertilizer Experiment on Vertisol

Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Boron on Fruit Growth, Yield and Quality of Winter Season Guava (Psidium guajava L.)

Effect of Nutrient Combinations on Plant Pigments and Yield of Bt Cotton Under Rainfed Condition

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) to Various Levels of Nitrogen and Potassium at Different Crop Growth Stages

Effect of Biofertilizers and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

Role of Potassium and Sulphur on the Growth, Yield and Oil Content of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Integrated Application of Micronutrients to Improve Growth, Yield, Quality and Economic Yield in Potato - A Review

RESPONSE OF BIO FERTILIZERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN KHARIF PADDY

Influence of Foliar Application of Urea, Potassium sulphate and Borax on the Fruit Quality of Guava

RESPONSES OF GARLIC TO ZINC, COPPER, BORON AND MOLYBDENUM APPLICATION IN GREY TERRACE SOIL OF AMNURA SOIL SERIES

Effect of nitrogen, zinc and boron on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) TO BALANCED FERTILIZATION UNDER SUB-HUMID SOUTHERN PLAIN ZONE OF RAJASTHAN

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Indo Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IAJMR) ISSN:

FERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.

Management of Coriander Wilt (Fusarium oxysporium) through Cultural Practices as Organic Amendments and Date of Sowing

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR BANANA MUSA (AB GROUP) NJALIPOOVAN IN ONATTUKARA SOILS

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth Parameters in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.)

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6 (2): (2014)

Alleviation of root zone constraints through foliar application of zinc and boron for grapes

Studies on the effect of Zinc levels, and methods of boron application on growth, yield and protein content of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.

An Asian Journal of Soil Science Vol. 6 No. 1 (June, 2011) : 11-16

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Available online at

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield Parameters in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.)

Department of Agronomy, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Faizabad (Uttar Pradesh), India. 2

Character association and path coefficient analysis in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Tuber Yield and Quality and Nutrient Uptake in Coleus forskohlii Briq.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Estimating Micronutrient Status and their Relationship with Other Soil Properties of Rewa District in Fiji

Available online at

THE GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY PARAMETERS OF BANANA CULTIVAR GRAND NAINE (AAA) AS INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT ORGANIC AMENDMENTS

Nutrition. Grain Legume Handbook

Effect of High-P-Chelated Micronutrient Foliar Spray on Yield and Quality of Chickpea

Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

Enhancing productivity and quality of fodder maize through soil and foliar zinc nutrition

Effect of the graded levels of potassium with recommended NP on soil properties under maize cultivation in alfisols of Mandya, Karnataka

Interaction Between Phosphorus and Zinc on the Biomass Yield and Yield Attributes of the Medicinal Plant Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana)

Interaction Effect Between Phosphorus and Zinc on their Availability in Soil in Relation to their Contents in Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana)

Effect of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize

Distribution of Micronutrients in Soil of Garhi Tehsil, Banswara District of Rajasthan, India

IM PACT OF DIF FER ENT LEV ELS OF ZN ON YIELD, QUAL ITY AND SOIL PROP ER - TIES OF SOY BEAN IN A VERTISOL

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 1, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

Effect of molybdenum and its application on seed production of cauliflower

Response of Zinc Fertilization to Wheat on Yield, Quality, Nutrients Uptake and Soil Fertility Grown In a Zinc Deficient Soil Keram, Komal Singh

Delineation of Areas Deficient for Micronutrients in Soils of Chittoor District, India

EFFECT OF ZINC FERTILIZATION ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF WHEAT GROWN UNDER AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITION OF KYMORE PLATEAU OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDIA

Response of Zinc and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Sodic Soil

Zinc Deficiency in Soil of Rajasthan and its Management

The Effect of Zinc Fertilization on Rice Productivity and Economics in Acid Alfisol of Jharkhand, India

Performance of indigeneous genotypes of tikhur (Curcuma angustifolia Roxb.) for growth, rhizome and starch yield

STUDIES ON IMPACT OF UREA, THIOUREA AND ZINC APPLICATION ON GROWTH YIELD QUALITY AND ECONOMIC OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR ENHANCED YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOYBEAN (

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(6):

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

HIND AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE

Quality and yield of Indian mustard genotypes as influenced by different fertility levels

Integrated Management of Turmeric Rhizome Rot Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum

Combined Effect of Different Micronutrients and Spacing on the Growth and Yield of Garlic (Allium sativum L.)

Eeffect of biofertilizers and foliar application of organic acids on yield, nutrient uptake and soil microbial activity in soybean

Studies on the effect of planting methods and nutrition on growth, yield and essential oil content in vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides (L.

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

Influence of sulphur fertilization on nutrient uptake of onion (Allium cepa L.)

Micro Nutrient Evaluation in Soils of Jhabua District of Madhya Pradesh

Evaluation of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Genotypes for Growth, Yield and Quality Traits under Northern Plains of India

Micronutrient Management. Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management

NUTRITION KNOW-HOW P.O. BOX 897 // WILLMAR, MN (800) // WCDST.COM

Available online at

RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO FERTILIZERS

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND VERMICOMPOST ON ZINC AVAILABILITY IN AN ACIDIC LATERITE SOIL OF WEST BENGAL, INDIA

Effect of Different Levels of Zinc and Sulphur on Yield and Yield Attributing Characters of Indian Mustard

Online Copy JEB. Journal of Environmental Biology. Micronutrient fortification in crop to enhance growth, yield and quality of aromatic rice

Response of sugarcane to different doses of Zn at various growth stages

GPS-GIS Based Soil Maps of Micronutrients Status in Organic Farms at College of Agriculture, Pune (M.S.), India

Quality of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) Genotypes under Shade Net Condition of Costal Andhra Pradesh

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Fertilization Programming

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

Effect of humic acid (potassium humate) on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in an alfisol

EconovaPlus Fertiliser

Soil Program Recommendation

Roses with Vitazyme application

QUALITY OF TOMATO (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) AS INFLUENCED BY BORON AND ZINC UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF NPK FERTILIZERS

Understanding a Soil Report

Transcription:

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 5 (2017) pp. 1471-1482 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.160 Effect of Different Micronutrients on Turmeric Variety Suranjana in Terai Region of West Bengal, India S. Datta*, S. Chakraborty, J.C. Jana, A. Debnath, M.K. Roy and S. Haque Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Coochbehar, 736165, India *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T K e y w o r d s Micronutrients, Boron, Iron, Manganese, Zinc, Turmeric, Yield. Article Info Accepted: 17 April 2017 Available Online: 10 May 2017 An experiment was undertaken at Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, West Bengal to study the effect of boron, iron, manganese and zinc on the growth and yield of turmeric during the year of 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2015-16. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Different treatments of the experiment were T 1 - control (no micronutrients), T 2 - soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 3 - soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 4 - soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 5 - soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 6 - foliar spray of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting, T 7 - foliar spray of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting, T 8 - foliar spray of boron (as borax) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting and T 9 - foliar spray of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting. The results revealed that soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 ) gave the highest yield (11.13 kg/3 m 2 and 22.45 t/ha) which was also statistically at par with foliar spray of boron as borax @ 0.5% at 60 and 90 days after planting (10.59 kg/3 m 2 and 21.36 t/ha). The lowest yield (7.17 kg/3m 2 and 14.45 t/ha).was recorded in the control treatment (i.e. without micronutrient application). The highest cost benefit ratio (1: 2.04) was recorded with soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 followed by foliar spray of boron (1: 1.95) (as borax) @ 0.5% at 60 and 90 days after planting. Introduction Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) is an important rhizomatous spice crop of India and World too. India is a leading producer, consumer and exporter of turmeric in the world. India is the major producer and exporter of turmeric and earned a foreign exchange of 2000 million $ (Anonymous, 2012). Apart from its spice and medicinal value it is also used in the dye, food and cosmetic industries. It is also used in the auspicious religious occasions. Turmeric inhibits the development of cataracts, breast cancer, colon cancer, and lymphoma (Devi et al., 2011). In India it is cultivated with an area of 1.95 lakh hectare (ha) with a production of 9.99 lakh tonnes. In West Bengal, it is cultivated with an area of 15.8 thousand ha and production of 42 thousand tonnes. Productivity of turmeric in West Bengal is quite low (2.66 tones/ha) compared to national average (5.11 tones/ha). It is a soil exhausting crop and application of N, P and K are recommended for its cultivation. Normally micronutrients do not find a place in the nutrient recommendations. However, high rhizome yields in turmeric with increasing concentrations of foliar sprays of 1471

magnesium sulphate in the acidic soils of Meghalaya have been reported (Chandra et al., 1997). Turmeric is highly responsive to chemical fertilizers. In addition, micronutrients fertilizers are mostly liable to reduce disease incidence and enhance durability of the post harvest life of ginger and turmeric (Halder et al., 2007). (Banafer et al., 1995), (Gupta and Singer, 1998), (Roy et al., 1992) stated in therir reports that ginger and turmeric are highly responsive to chemical fertilzers and increased the growth and rhizome yield with increments of fertilizer rates. Bose et al., (2008) reported that inclusion of S and Mg in the fertilization schedule greatly improved the fresh yields of turmeric in the depleted red lateritic soils of West Bengal. Similarly, Kavitha (2012) revealed that in the rhizomatous crop kacholam (Kaempferia galanga L.), top dressing of sulphur and magnesium resulted in higher rhizome yields. Recent research has shown that application of Fe significantly increased in yield of crops. Chhibba et al., (2007) reported that the foliar application of Fe increased yield and Fe concentration in fenugreek. Beneficial effect of Effect of Zn, Fe and B on growth and yield of ginger was reported by Roy et al., (1992). Halder et al (2007) reported the beneficial effect of zinc and boron on turmeric yield and quality. Very information is available with respect to the effect of boron, iron, manganese and zinc on the growth and yield of turmeric, with keeping this views, the present experiment was undertaken with the effect of boron, iron, manganese and zinc on the growth and yield of turmeric. Materials and Methods An investigation was undertaken to study the effect of boron, iron, manganese and zinc on the growth and yield of turmeric in Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal during the year of 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2015-16. The experimental soil was sandy clay loam having p H 5.6, 0.90% organic carbon, 131.45 kg/ha available nitrogen, 47.38 kg/ha available phosphorus and 65.82 kg/ha potash. The climatic condition of this region is subtropical humid in nature. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with five replications. Raised beds of 3 m X 1 m size and 15 cm height were prepared. Turmeric rhizome of the variety Suranjana was planted with a spacing of 30 cm x 20 cm during the first week of May 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2015, respectively. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 9 treatments and three replications. The treatment details were T 1 - control (no micronutrients), T 2 - soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 3 - soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 4 - soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 5 - soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1, T 6 - foliar spray of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting, T 7 - foliar spray of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting, T 8 - foliar spray of boron (as borax) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting and T 9 - foliar spray of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting. Full dose of Farm yard manure @ 15 t/ha was applied as basal. Inorganic fertilizers were applied at the rate of 80: 80: 120 kg/ha of N: P 2 O 5 : K 2 O. Among the inorganic fertilizers, full dose of P 2 O 5 and 1/3 dose of N was applied as basal, rest 2/3 rd N and K 2 O were applied in two equal splits at 45 and 90 days after planting. Observations on different morphological and yield attributing characters were recorded from five randomly selected plants from each plots. Rhizome yield per hectare was calculated on the plot weight basis. Statistical analysis of the data was done as per method suggested by Gomez and Gomez (1984). 1472

Results and Discussion Perusal of the data presented in tables 1 6 revealed that there was a significant variation in the different, growth, rhizome weight and rhizome yield. Maximum plant height was recorded in the soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 (97.82 cm) which was statistically at par with soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (94.75 cm) (Table 1). Higher plant height was also recorded in treatment of foliar spray of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (91.37 cm) and soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (90.25 cm). Whereas the lowest plant height (84.31 cm) was recorded in control plots. With respect to tillers per plant, more number of tillers per plant was recorded with soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (3.38) followed by soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (3.26), foliar spray of boron (as borax) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (3.19), soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (2.95) and soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 (2.88) and minimum number recorded in control treatment (no micronutrients) (2.16). Soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 showed the highest number of leaves (8.66) which was also statistically at par with soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (8.41), soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 (8.22) and soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (8.22) and it was lowest with control (no micronutrients) treatment (7.83) (Table 2). Maximum leaf length was recorded with soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 (41.38) followed by soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (41.34 cm), soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (40.49 cm), soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 5 (39.96) T6 (39.95) and foliar spray of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (39.74 cm) (Table 2). With respect to leaf breadth (Table 3), the widest leaf was recorded in the treatment of application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 (10.36 cm) followed by soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (10.14 cm), foliar spray of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (10.12 cm), foliar spray of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (9.98 cm) and soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (9.89 cm). The lowest leaf breadth was recorded in the treatment of soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (8.74 cm). In this experiment weight of mother rhizome varied from 44.36 g to 66.31 g. Maximum mother rhizome weight was recorded with soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (66.31 g) which was also statically at par with soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (64.31 g) treatment (Table 3). The lowest mother rhizome weight (44.36) was recorded in control treatment (i.e. without micronutrient). The results revealed that application micronutrient significantly increased the weight of primary and secondary rhizome per plant (Table 4). Maximum weight of mother rhizome was record with the treatment of foliar spray of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (115.37 g) followed by soil application of zinc (as ZnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (114.25 g), soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (113.17 g) and foliar spray of boron (as borax) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting (110.63 g) (Table 4). 1473

Table.1 Effect of boron, manganese, zinc and iron on plant height and tiller number of turmeric Treatment Plant height (cm) Tiller Number 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled T 1 82.00 80.47 78.83 95.93 84.31 2.00 1.88 1.89 2.87 2.16 T 2 96.33 96.07 90.40 108.47 97.82 2.56 2.29 1.93 4.73 2.88 T 3 94.03 85.23 78.73 103.00 90.25 2.56 1.72 2.11 3.53 2.48 T 4 81.99 79.32 73.82 92.33 81.87 3.56 3.17 3.13 3.67 3.38 T 5 94.40 91.64 83.81 109.13 94.75 3.11 2.50 2.13 4.07 2.95 T 6 88.41 86.51 81.60 101.67 89.55 2.44 1.83 2.33 3.53 2.53 T 7 86.34 78.35 73.54 118.00 89.06 2.56 1.96 1.97 3.87 2.59 T 8 84.12 74.11 87.28 110.40 88.98 3.44 2.27 2.32 4.73 3.19 T 9 92.57 84.97 80.13 107.80 91.37 3.33 2.69 2.33 4.67 3.26 SEm± 3.03 3.66 3.65 1.74 1.65 0.21 0.30 0.31 0.23 0.13 CD (P = 0.05) 9.10 10.97 10.95 5.20 4.64 0.64 0.90 0.92 0.68 0.37 CV 5.99 7.54 7.82 2.86 6.35 12.93 23.04 23.86 9.93 15.87 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting 1474

Table.2 Effect of boron, manganese, zinc and iron on number of leaves and leaf length of turmeric Treatment Number of leaves Leaf length (cm) 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled T 1 7.00 8.50 8.50 7.07 7.77 35.10 40.17 39.60 35.90 37.69 T 2 8.44 7.61 7.89 9.07 8.25 44.78 42.28 37.38 41.08 41.38 T 3 8.33 9.44 9.00 7.87 8.66 43.11 39.78 39.16 39.92 40.49 T 4 8.11 7.94 7.61 8.20 7.97 36.87 33.40 34.07 36.86 35.30 T 5 8.22 8.50 8.44 8.47 8.41 43.89 40.26 35.59 40.08 39.96 T 6 8.00 6.16 6.10 7.73 7.00 40.46 40.90 37.23 41.20 39.95 T 7 7.89 7.17 7.33 9.13 7.88 40.30 39.70 36.83 42.12 39.74 T 8 7.89 6.45 8.33 10.20 8.22 37.23 37.90 36.00 43.57 38.68 T 9 8.11 7.11 6.67 9.33 7.81 41.72 40.72 40.23 42.67 41.34 SEm± 0.36 0.48 0.49 0.24 0.21 1.52 1.36 1.78 1.07 0.78 CD (P = 0.05) 1.09 1.44 1.46 0.71 0.60 4.56 4.09 5.33 3.21 2.21 CV 7.86 10.87 10.87 4.76 9.21 6.52 5.99 8.24 4.59 6.88 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting. 1475

Table.3 Effect of boron, manganese, zinc and iron on breadth and weight of mother rhizome of turmeric Treatment Leaf breadth (cm) Weight of mother rhizome (g) 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled T 1 9.00 9.39 8.39 8.98 8.94 40.89 43.22 42.56 50.77 44.36 T 2 11.09 10.28 9.53 10.53 10.36 52.22 47.78 43.78 59.81 50.90 T 3 10.03 9.83 9.67 10.02 9.89 63.00 62.11 65.11 67.03 64.31 T 4 9.74 8.58 8.44 8.87 8.91 45.78 44.45 48.78 56.67 48.92 T 5 9.52 8.28 8.11 9.05 8.74 48.44 40.44 43.67 52.56 46.28 T 6 10.67 10.21 9.50 10.12 10.12 47.44 43.72 40.22 51.33 45.68 T 7 10.41 10.08 8.96 10.47 9.98 57.56 53.78 52.17 60.43 55.98 T 8 9.27 9.60 9.35 10.56 9.70 64.22 55.83 56.17 65.14 60.34 T 9 9.61 10.28 10.22 10.46 10.14 64.00 65.94 66.94 68.37 66.31 SEm± 0.51 0.74 0.81 0.18 0.32 3.29 2.46 5.0 1.65 1.64 CD (P = 0.05) 1.52 2.22 2.42 0.55 0.90 9.87 7.39 11.98 4.97 4.63 CV 8.82 13.32 15.32 3.24 11.50 10.76 8.41 16.95 4.06 1.64 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting 1476

Table.4 Effect of boron, manganese, zinc and iron on weight of primary and secondary rhizome of turmeric Treatment Weight of primary rhizome Weight of secondary rhizome 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled T 1 87.00 71.67 69.00 90.71 79.59 80.67 36.22 35.06 45.95 49.48 T 2 102.67 93.68 78.67 130.26 101.32 120.44 58.76 56.92 86.93 80.76 T 3 112.89 118.50 107.00 114.29 113.17 137.56 56.39 54.39 79.47 81.95 T 4 98.89 102.50 102.06 115.03 104.62 127.11 62.98 60.21 77.08 81.85 T 5 111.78 114.11 111.94 119.15 114.25 110.78 60.67 58.89 75.45 76.45 T 6 111.00 84.78 72.78 113.45 95.50 144.00 48.17 48.83 78.03 79.76 T 7 153.56 109.61 103.10 95.21 115.37 139.00 58.67 58.61 55.16 77.86 T 8 123.22 95.61 99.22 124.47 110.63 130.00 43.83 44.39 82.10 75.08 T 9 126.33 81.39 81.94 119.60 102.32 144.33 40.94 42.57 83.04 77.72 SEm± 4.47 3.55 5.41 1.97 1.97 3.74 2.28 2.86 1.66 1.39 CD (P = 0.05) 13.42 10.65 16.22 5.91 5.55 11.21 6.82 8.58 5.06 3.91 CV 6.82 6.36 10.21 3.00 6.56 5.14 7.60 9.70 3.96 6.35 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting 1477

Table.5 Effect of boron, manganese, zinc and iron on plant population of turmeric Treatment Plant population at (30DAP) Plant population at (60DAP) 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled T 1 36.00 37.67 37.67 39.33 37.67 35.00 35.67 35.67 38.67 36.25 T 2 38.67 34.67 35.00 38.67 36.75 38.67 34.00 34.00 36.67 35.83 T 3 39.33 34.67 36.67 37.67 37.08 38.33 34.33 36.33 36.67 36.42 T 4 38.33 36.33 36.67 38.00 37.33 36.33 35.67 36.33 36.67 36.25 T 5 37.33 36.67 37.00 38.33 37.33 36.67 35.33 37.00 38.00 36.75 T 6 38.67 38.00 38.33 37.67 38.17 36.67 37.33 38.00 37.00 37.25 T 7 39.67 35.67 36.00 37.67 37.25 36.67 35.33 35.33 37.67 36.25 T 8 40.00 39.67 39.00 38.00 39.17 37.33 38.00 38.33 38.00 37.92 T 9 37.33 38.67 38.33 39.67 38.50 37.33 37.33 38.00 39.67 38.08 SEm± 0.81 1.13 1.00 0.86 0.51 1.09 1.14 0.93.71 0.51 CD (P = 0.05) 2.45 3.38 3.01 2.59 1.44 3.28 3.43 2.80 2.14 1.43 CV 3.69 5.30 4.68 3.91 4.68 5.12 5.51 4.42 3.28 4.77 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting. 1478

Table.6 Effect of boron, manganese, zinc and iron on rhizome yield of turmeric Treatment Yield per Plot (kg/3 m 2 ) Projected Yield (t/ha) 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2015-16 Pooled T 1 6.89 6.70 6.50 8.57 7.17 13.89 13.51 13.10 17.28 14.45 T 2 10.17 10.33 10.17 13.87 11.13 20.50 20.83 20.50 27.96 22.45 T 3 9.33 7.60 7.93 11.78 9.16 18.82 15.32 15.99 23.74 18.47 T 4 8.67 7.83 7.90 11.61 9.00 17.47 15.79 15.93 23.41 18.15 T 5 9.33 7.73 8.00 11.40 9.11 18.82 15.59 16.13 22.98 18.38 T 6 8.83 8.37 7.57 11.15 8.98 17.81 16.87 15.25 22.47 18.10 T 7 7.50 6.37 5.83 9.80 7.38 15.12 12.84 11.76 19.75 14.87 T 8 8.83 10.03 10.17 13.35 10.59 17.81 20.23 20.50 26.91 21.36 T 9 9.83 7.97 8.47 13.21 9.87 19.82 16.06 17.07 26.64 19.90 SEm± 0.71 0.73 0.79 0.25 0.43 1.42 1.48 1.60 0.50 0.86 CD (P = 0.05) 2.11 2.20 2.38 0.76 1.20 4.26 4.43 4.80 1.52 2.42 CV% 13.84 15.68 17.07 3.75 16.10 13.84 15.68 17.64 3.75 16.09 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting. 1479

Table.7 Cost Benefit ratio of different treatments Treat ments Expense (Rs./ha) Income (Rs./ha) Net income (Rs./ha) C:B Land Preparation Seed rhizome cost Micronu trient and applicati on cost Labour (Bed preparation, sowing, weeding, harvesting, spraying etc) Fertilizer Total Producti on (ton/ ha) Rate (Rs./ t) Sell amount (Rs.) N P K FYM T1 10000 50,000 0 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,15,409 14.45 20,000 289000 73,591 1 : 1.34 T2 10000 50,000 5,512 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,20,921 22.45 20,000 449000 2,28,079 1 : 2.03 T3 10000 50,000 2,512 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,17,921 18.47 20,000 369400 1,51,479 1 : 1.70 T4 10000 50,000 1,137 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,16,546 18.15 20,000 363000 1,46,454 1: 1.68 T5 10000 50,000 1,962 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,17,371 18.38 20,000 367600 1,50,229 1 : 1.69 T6 10000 50,000 2,528 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,17,937 18.1 20,000 362000 1,44,063 1 :.66 T7 10000 50,000 2,198 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,17,607 14.87 20,000 297400 79,793 1 : 1.37 T8 10000 50,000 3,284 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,18,693 21.36 20,000 427200 2,08,507 1: 1.95 T 9 10000 50,000 2,384 1,25,572 1,056 3,075 3,206 22,500 2,17,793 19.9 20,000 398000 1,80,207 1 :1.83 planting and T 9 - Foliar spray of Zinc (ZnSO 4 ) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting 1480

With respect to the weight of secondary rhizome, the higher weight of secondary rhizome was recorded with the treatment of soil application of manganese (as MnSO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (81.95 g), - soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (81.85 g) and soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 (80.76 g). Lowest primary and secondary rhizome weight was recorded in the control treatment (79.59 g and 49.48 g, respectively) (Table 4). Effect of micronutrient on the turmeric plant population survival from 30 days after transplanting to the maturity (i.e. at the time harvest) was almost nothing (Table 5). Among the different treatment, soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 gave the highest yield (11.13 kg/3m 2 and 22.45 t/ha) which was also statistically at par with foliar spray of boron (as borax) @ 0.5% after 60 and 90 days of planting treatment (10.59 kg/3m 2 and 21.36 t/ha) (Table 4). Higher yield of turmeric rhizome was also recorded in the treatment of soil application of iron (as Fe 2 SO 4 ) @ 25Kg ha -1 (9.87 kg/3m2 and 19.90 t/ha). The lowest yield was recorded in the control plot (7.17 kg/3m2 and 14.45 t/ha). In this experiment higher yield recorded in micronutrient treated plot as compared to the control plots. This might be due the beneficial effect of the micronutrient on turmeric yield. Among the different micronutrient, soil application of boron gave highest yield as compared to the other treatment. Sugtto and Mafutuchah (1995), Pawar and Gavande (1992) and Singh et al., (1992) also observed similar findings in their report as found in boron application. Considering cost benefit ratio, the highest C : B ratio (1 : 2.04) was recorded with the soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 followed by foliar spray of boron (1 : 1.95) (as borax) @ 0.5% at 60 and 90 days after planting and lowest C : B ratio (1 : 1.34) was recorded in the control treatment (i.e. application of no micronutrient) (Table 7). In conclusion, from the above discussion it may be concluded that soil application of boron (as borax) @ 25Kg ha -1 ) and foliar spray of boron (as borax) @ 0.5% at 60 and 90 days after planting (1 : 1.95) were beneficial for getting higher yield in turmeric. Acknowledgement The authors are highly indebted to Indian Institute of Spices Research Indian Council of Agricultural Research, for their financial help by providing research grant, guidance and support in every step of experiment. References Anonymous. 2012. Major State wise Area & production of Spices in India, accessed at <http://www.indianspices.com/statistics > on 20.06.2013. Banafar, R.N.S. and Tiwari, RJ. 1995. Response of turmeric to potassium application in medium black soils of Madhya pradesh. Crop Res., (Hissar), 10: 93-95. Bose, P., Sanyal, D. and Majumdar, K. 2008. Balancing sulfur and magnesium nutrition for turmeric and carrot grown on red lateritic soil. Better Crops, 92(1): 23-25. Chandra, R., Desai, A.R. and Govind, S. 1997. Effect of foliar spray of magnesium and planting materials on growth and yield of turmeric. J. Hill Res., 10(1): 1-4. Chhibba, I.M., Nayyar, V.K., Kanwar, J.S. 2007. Influence of mode and source of applied iron on fenugreek (Trigonella corniculata L). in a Typic Ustochrept in Punjab, India. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 9(2): 254-256. 1481

Devi, K.S.P. and Sangamithra, A. 2011. Turmeric - Indian Saffron, Technical Bulletin: Science Tech Entrepreneur, Pp. 1-7. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2 nd Ed.. A Willey-Inter Science Publication (John Wiley and sons) New York, Pp. 20-30. Gupta, C.R. And Singar, S.S. 1998. Effect of varying levels of of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium level on growth and yield of turmeric in hill zone,karnataka. J. Spices and Aromatic Crops, 9 : 28-32 Halder, N.K., Shill, N.C., Siddiky, M.A., Sarkar, J. and Gomes, R. 2007. Response of turmeric to zinc and boron fertilization. J. Biol. Sci., 7(1): 182-187. Kavitha, P.R. 2012. Nutrient management for yield and quality improvement in kacholam (Kaempferia galanga L). M.Sc. (Ag). thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 97. Pawar, H.K. and Gavande, S.S. 1992. Content and uptake of NPK by ginger rhizomes as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen management. J. Maharastra Agri. Univ., 17: 282-283. Roy, A., Cahatterjee, R., Hassan, A. and Maitra, S.K. 1992. Effect of Zn, Fe and B on growth, yield and nutrient content in leaf of ginger. Indian Cocoa, Arecanut and Spices J., 15: 99-101. Singh, V.P., Swer, B. and Singh, S.P. 1992. Influence of nitrogen and potassium on yield of turmeric. Indian Cocoa, Arecanut and Spices J., 15: 104-106. Sugtto, Y. And Mafutuchah. 1995. Influence of rates of farmyard manure and KCl on growth, yield and quality of ginger rhizome. Agrivita, 18: 67-73. How to cite this article: Datta, S., S. Chakraborty, J.C. Jana, A. Debnath, M.K. Roy and Haque, S. 2017. Effect of Different Micronutrients on Turmeric Variety Suranjana in Terai Region of West Bengal, India. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(5): 1471-1482. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.160 1482