Score Report. Test Administered WMS IV (3/16/2009) Age at Testing 24 years 0 months Retest? No

Similar documents
TOPF (Test of Pre-Morbid Function)

ID: Test Date: 06/06/2017 Name: John Sample Examiner Name: Tina Anderson

Interpreting change on the WAIS-III/WMS-III in clinical samples

Client/Testing Information

Improving the Methodology for Assessing Mild Cognitive Impairment Across the Lifespan

The inner workings of working memory: Preliminary data from unimpaired populations

The Interchangeability of CVLT-II and WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates Scores: A Slightly Different Story

Developmental Assessment of Young Children Second Edition (DAYC-2) Summary Report

Assessing cognitive function after stroke. Glyn Humphreys

Disclosure statement

Working memory in. development: Links with learning between. typical and atypical populations. TRACY PACKIAM ALLOWAY Durham University, UK

Test review. Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) By Cecil R. Reynolds. Austin, Texas: PRO-ED, Inc., Test description

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cochlear Implants Int. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 March 15.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Working Memory Training in Children with Cochlear Implants: A First Report

Simplifying Reporting of Communication Development Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss

Consolidating working memory: Enhancing cognitive performance through effective encoding

Meniere s Disease Case. Suzanne Beason-Hazen, Ph.D.

Beyond the Psychologist s Report. Nancy Foster, PhD Institute for Brain-Behavior Integration

Base Rates of Impaired Neuropsychological Test Performance Among Healthy Older Adults

Process of a neuropsychological assessment

ADDES-3 QUICK SCORE SCHOOL VERION PROFILE SAMPLE

Running head: CPPS REVIEW 1

APPENDIX A TASK DEVELOPMENT AND NORMATIVE DATA

Early Childhood Measurement and Evaluation Tool Review

NIH Toolbox. Scoring and Interpretation Guide. September 18, 2012

PRELIMINARY NORMS FOR YEAR OLDS ON THE MEMORY TEST FOR OLDER ADULTS (MTOA:S) ABSTRACT

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Using contextual analysis to investigate the nature of spatial memory

NEUROBEHAVIORAL EVALUATION OF HOUSEHOLD EXPOSURE TO DURSBAN 1

M P---- Ph.D. Clinical Psychologist / Neuropsychologist

McCloskey Executive Functions Scale (MEFS) Report

ID: Test Date: 05/14/2018 Name: Sample N. Student Rater Name: Self. Birth Date: 05/18/1999 Age: 18:11 Year in. Enrollment: Full-Time

21/05/2018. Today s webinar will answer. Presented by: Valorie O Keefe Consultant Psychologist

Table 1: Summary of measures of cognitive fatigability operationalised in existing research.

Neuropsychological Evaluation of

The Association Between Comorbidities and Neurocognitive Impairment in Aging Veterans with HIV

AMNESTIC MINIMAL COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: BEYOND MEMORY

Abstract Reasoning Test 1

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PSYC32

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Overview for Best Practice in Stroke and Complex Neurological Conditions March 2013

The Plan for Today. Some context. Some data. What I think I ve learned

COGNITIVE ALTERATIONS IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE K K L E E

Plenary Session 2 Psychometric Assessment. Ralph H B Benedict, PhD, ABPP-CN Professor of Neurology and Psychiatry SUNY Buffalo

Detecting neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected youth: Are we focusing on the wrong factors?

La cognizione sociale

The Use of Brief Assessment Batteries in Multiple Sclerosis. History of Cognitive Studies in MS

Adaptive Design in CIAS

EARLY ONSET FRONTOTERMPORAL DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMERS DISEASE: DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND CARE

Attemo: An Objective Measure of Attention and Motion Control Pearson Clinical Assessment. Attemo Overview

Method. NeuRA Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder April 2016

10/18/2016. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition 1. Meet Dr. Saulnier. Bio. Celine A. Saulnier, PhD Vineland-3 Author

The Role of Cardiovascular Risk and Aging in Memory Performance in a Sample of Veterans with HIV

The Neuropsychology of

Personality and Individual Differences

Measurement and Classification of Neurocognitive Disability in HIV/AIDS Robert K. Heaton Ph.D University of California San Diego Ancient History

AD Prevention Trials: An Industry Perspective

MOS SF-36 health survey (Ware &

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

Disorders of working memory: Causes and remediation

Understanding CELF-5 Reliability & Validity to Improve Diagnostic Decisions

Describe what is meant by a placebo Contrast the double-blind procedure with the single-blind procedure Review the structure for organizing a memo

Empowered by Psychometrics The Fundamentals of Psychometrics. Jim Wollack University of Wisconsin Madison

A confirmatory factor analysis of the WMS-III in a clinical sample with crossvalidation in the standardization sample

Cognitive rehabilitation: assessment. Dawn Langdon PhD

Mental Imagery. What is Imagery? What We Can Imagine 3/3/10. What is nature of the images? What is the nature of imagery for the other senses?

Interpretation in neuropsychological assessment

Demystifying the Neuropsychological Evaluation Report. Clinical Neuropsychologist 17 March 2017 Program Director, Neurobehavioral Program

Verbal Working Memory. The left temporoparietal junction in verbal working memory: Storage or attention. Baddelely s Multiple-Component Model

February 8, Prepared By: Glen M. Doniger, PhD Director of Scientific Development NeuroTrax Corporation

Supplementary Online Content

CANTAB Test descriptions by function

Understanding Users. - cognitive processes. Unit 3

Service Related Project. Kimberley Keegan

No Wrong Door Integrative Screener 1.0 Feedback Sheet 01/14/15

Business Statistics Probability

The Influence of Sleep on Cognition in Breast Cancer

ADES QUICK SCORE SCHOOL VERION PROFILE SAMPLE

relationship to brain damage after severe closed head injury

Thank you! Access to Services and Response to Treatment Among Minority Children with an ASD. What do we know? Touch on these questions:

How do we construct Intelligence tests? Tests must be: Standardized Reliable Valid

Supplementary Online Content

13:21. Working Memory Training & Cancer. Agenda. Why is Working Memory Training Salient for Cancer Survivors?

WORKING MEMORY IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

New Study Confirms the Clinical Usefulness of the ImPACT Baseline ImPACT Testing Model VOL. 2 - FALL 2014

New Group Reading Test Level 3A

Name at birth. Address. MMSE: CASE: Cognigram. MMSE (Folstein and coll., 1975) Temporal Orientation Day: Date: Month: Season: Year: /5

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER

Chapter 7 BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT

Elderly Norms for the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised*

BRIEF Kingston Standardized Cognitive Assessment - revised

Samantha Sample 01 Feb 2013 EXPERT STANDARD REPORT ABILITY ADAPT-G ADAPTIVE GENERAL REASONING TEST. Psychometrics Ltd.

The Five-Point Test: Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for Children and Adults

Mitigation of Proper Name Retrieval Impairments in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Statistics 571: Statistical Methods Summer 2003 Final Exam Ramón V. León

International Forum on HIV and Rehabilitation Research

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT S A R A H R A S K I N, P H D, A B P P S A R A H B U L L A R D, P H D, A B P P

Brief Report. Does Modafinil Enhance Cognitive Performance in Young Volunteers Who Are Not Sleep-Deprived?

CNADC NIA ADC Clinical Task Force UDS Neuropsychology Work Group April 2011

Transcription:

Score Report Examinee Name Date of Report 3/16/2009 Examinee ID 5823 Education 16 Date of Birth 3/16/1985 Home Language English Gender Male Handedness Left White not Hispanic Race/Ethnicity Origin Examiner Name Janet Vaughn Test Administered WMS IV (3/16/2009) Age at Testing 24 years 0 months Retest? No WMS IV Comments Brief Cognitive Status Exam Classification Age Years of Education Raw Score Classification Level Base Rate 24 years 0 months 16 55 Average 100.0 Index Score Summary 95% Index Sum of s Index Score Percentile Rank Confidence Interval Qualitative Description Auditory Memory 44 AMI 105 63 99-111 Average Visual Memory 29 VMI 84 14 79-90 Low Average Visual Working Memory 24 VWMI 112 79 104-118 High Average Immediate Memory 33 IMI 87 19 81-94 Low Average Delayed Memory 40 DMI 100 50 93-107 Average Page 1 of 5

Index Score Profile Index Scores and Standard Error of Measurement Index Score SEM AMI 105 3.35 VMI 84 3 VWMI 112 3.67 IMI 87 3.35 DMI 100 3.35 The vertical bars represent the standard error of measurement (SEM). Primary Summary Domain Raw Score Percentile Rank Logical Memory I AM 25 10 50 Logical Memory II AM 23 10 50 Verbal Paired Associates I AM 42 11 63 Verbal Paired Associates II AM 14 13 84 Designs I VM 58 6 9 Designs II VM 49 7 16 Visual Reproduction I VM 31 6 9 Visual Reproduction II VM 29 10 50 Spatial Addition VWM 16 10 50 Symbol Span VWM 37 14 91 Page 2 of 5

Primary Profile Process Score Conversions Auditory Memory Process Score Summary Process Score Raw Score Percentile Rank LM II Recognition 22 - - 17-25% VPA II Recognition 38 - - 17-25% VPA II Word Recall 26 14 91 - Visual Memory Process Score Summary Process Score Raw Score Percentile Rank DE I Content 48 18 99.6 - DE I Spatial 10 3 1 - DE II Content 35 9 37 - DE II Spatial 12 8 25 - DE II Recognition 18 - - 51-75% VR II Recognition 4 - - 3-9% Page 3 of 5

Visual Memory Process Score Summary Process Score Raw Score Percentile Rank VR II Copy 34 - - <=2% -Level Differences Within Indexes Auditory Memory Index AMI Mean Logical Memory I 10 11.00-1.00 2.64 >25% Logical Memory II 10 11.00-1.00 2.48 >25% Verbal Paired Associates I 11 11.00 0.00 1.90 >25% Verbal Paired Associates II 13 11.00 2.00 2.48 25% Visual Memory Index VMI Mean Designs I 6 7.25-1.25 2.38 >25% Designs II 7 7.25-0.25 2.38 >25% Visual Reproduction I 6 7.25-1.25 1.86 >25% Visual Reproduction II 10 7.25 2.75 1.48 15% Immediate Memory Index IMI Mean Logical Memory I 10 8.25 1.75 2.59 >25% Verbal Paired Associates I 11 8.25 2.75 1.82 15-25% Designs I 6 8.25-2.25 2.42 25% Visual Reproduction I 6 8.25-2.25 1.91 >25% Delayed Memory Index DMI Mean Logical Memory II 10 10.00 0.00 2.44 >25% Verbal Paired Associates II 13 10.00 3.00 2.44 15% Designs II 7 10.00-3.00 2.44 15% Visual Reproduction II 10 10.00 0.00 1.57 >25% Page 4 of 5

Discrepancy Comparison Comparison Score 1 Score 2 Difference Critical Value Base Rate Spatial Addition Symbol Span 10 14-4 2.74 25.9 -Level Contrast s Logical Memory LM II Recognition vs. Delayed Recall 17-25% 10 12 LM Immediate Recall vs. Delayed Recall 10 10 11 Verbal Paired Associates VPA II Recognition vs. Delayed Recall 17-25% 13 18 VPA Immediate Recall vs. Delayed Recall 11 13 13 Designs DE I Spatial vs. Content 3 18 19 DE II Spatial vs. Content 8 9 10 DE II Recognition vs. Delayed Recall 51-75% 7 6 DE Immediate Recall vs. Delayed Recall 6 7 10 Visual Reproduction VR II Recognition vs. Delayed Recall 3-9% 10 13 VR Copy vs. Immediate Recall <=2% 6 10 VR Immediate Recall vs. Delayed Recall 6 10 14 Index-Level Contrast s WMS IV Indexes Auditory Memory Index vs. Visual Memory Index 105 84 6 Visual Working Memory Index vs. Visual Memory Index 112 84 4 Immediate Memory Index vs. Delayed Memory Index 87 100 14 Page 5 of 5