The FOURIER Trial. On behalf of the FOURIER Investigators. American Heart Association Scientific Sessions November 13, 2017

Similar documents
LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Lipoprotein(a), PCSK9 Inhibition and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

FOURIER Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk

FOURIER. Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

Does IMPROVE-IT & FOURIER Confirm or Refute the LDL Hypothesis?

Workshop. Todd Anderson MD / Jacques Genest MD

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

Antithrombotic Therapy for Long-Term Secondary Prevention Considerations for Long-Term DAPT

Indicações para um inibidor de PCSK9

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

EVIDENCE TO DATE EVOLOCUMAB (REPATHA)

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Update on Lipid Guidelines and Intense Treatment of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibitors Carl J. Lavie, MD,FACC,FACP,FCCP

THIERS CHAGAS BAHIA FOURIER- ESTUDO DE INIBIÇÃO DA PCSK9 EM PACIENTES DE ALTO RISCO CARDIOVASCULAR

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Fasting or non fasting?

Zürcher Herzkurs, New drugs and interactions. LDL - what else?

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Is there enough evidence for DAPT after endovascular intervention for PAOD?

ACS: What happens after the acute phase? Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

Evidence-based Appraisal of the FOURIER Trial

Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald and Beta- Quantification of LDL-C in Patients in FOURIER

Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors for stroke prevention

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Landmesser U et al. Eur Heart J 2017; /eurheartj/ehx549

6/30/2018. Cholesterol Management in the 21 st Century: Who Do We Treat? How Low Do We Go? DISCLOSURES

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Cholesterol, guidelines, targets and new medications

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

PCSK9 and its Role in LDL Receptor Regulation Muscat, Oman - 9 February 2019

Razionale ed evidenze scientifiche di Doppia Antiaggregazione Piastrinica a lungo termine nel Paziente con Sindrome Coronarica Acuta

Best Medical Therapy for asymptomatic carotid disease

Hyperlipidemia Guidelines: What s New in 2015? Eva Lonn, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Reducing Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Cardiovascular safety & efficacy of lorcaserin in overweight and obese patients Primary results from the CAMELLIA- TIMI 61 Trial

Cardiovascular safety & efficacy of lorcaserin in overweight and obese patients Primary results from the CAMELLIATIMI 61 Trial

2/26/19. Secondary Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Incorporating Evolving Data to Individualize Care. Disclosures. Faculty

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Problem patients in primary care Patient 4: Peripheral artery disease

Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

A new era in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD)?

Evolving Concepts on Lipid Management from Ezetimibe (IMPROVE IT) to PCSK9 Inhibitors

Educational Objectives. Disease Trajectories and CVD Risk Reduction. Hypercholesterolemia Support for LDL-C Causality

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

No relevant financial relationships

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Canadian Cardiovascular Lipid Guidelines

New Horizons in Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Medical Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease

Is the combination of antithrombotics and lowdose anticoagulants worthwhile in PAD The VOYAGER trial

New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Lipids: Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Poised for a Breakthrough?

Reducing LDL-C with Non- Statin Therapies

Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombosis

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

The Changing Landscape of Managing Patients with PAD- Update on the Evidence and Practice of Care in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

NEWS BRIEFING Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Moderated by: Robert Eckel, MD University of Colorado

Lipids: Guidelines & Best Treatment Options

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

2016 ESC/EAS Guideline in Dyslipidemias: Impact on Treatment& Clinical Practice

Re- Setting our COMPASS for Secondary Prevention in Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease

THE CRUCIAL PROBLEM OF ASCVD Can New Therapeutic Options Resolve It? THE CRUCIAL PROBLEM OF ASCVD Can New Therapeutic Options Resolve It?

The ACCELERATE Trial

Supplementary Online Content

Leading a New Paradigm in Cardiovascular Health Management

TOP CLINICAL TRIALS of 2018 to Impact Your Practice - ASCEND (& REDUCE IT)

PCSK9 Inhibitors: Narnia vs. Medicare Bankruptcy

La terapia antiaggregante nel paziente con stroke

Dual Antiplatelet duration in ACS: too long or too short?

Drug Class Monograph

A New Age of Dyslipidemia Treatment: Role of Non- Statin Therapies

Managing Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk: Using the Data to Optimize Care

Lipids What s new? Meera Jain, MD Providence Portland Medical Center

7 th Munich Vascular Conference

Advanced Treatment of LDL: How Low Should You Go?

Advanced Treatment of LDL: How Low Should You Go?

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

4 th and Goal To Go How Low Should We Go? :

2017 Update in Internal Medicine: Clinical Dyslipidemia Update

Supplementary Online Content

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

New Approaches to Lower LDL-C

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Surveying the Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management

Transcription:

The FOURIER Trial Sabina A. Murphy, Terje R. Pedersen, Zbigniew A. Gaciong, Richard Ceska, Marat V. Ezhov, Derek Connolly, Oleg Kraydashenko, J. Wouter Jukema, Kalman Toth, Matti J. Tikkanen, Kyungah Im, Stephen D. Wiviott, Christopher Kurtz, Narimon Honarpour, Robert P. Giugliano, Anthony C. Keech, Peter S. Sever, Marc S. Sabatine On behalf of the FOURIER Investigators American Heart Association Scientific Sessions November 13, 2017

PCSK9 blocks LDLR-Recycling More LDL-Receptor Less LDL-C AB More Less LDL-Receptor Higher Less LDL-C modifiziert nach Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Science 2013 (6133):689-90

Statin vs. Statin + PCSK9 antibody

Statin vs. Statin + PCSK9 antibody Sabatine et al N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713-1722

Hypothesis PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab reduces total vascular events, both first and recurrent!

Type of Primary Endpoint Events Total PEP = 4906 First Events Additional Events 2907 1999 CV Death MI Stroke Hosp for UA Coronary Revasc

# Events Total Primary Endpoint Events 3000 2000 1000 1563 1st Event HR 0.85 (0.79-0.92) 1344-219 0

# Events Total Primary Endpoint Events 3000 2000 1151 Additional Events RR 0.74 (0.65-0.85) 848-303 1000 1563 1st Event HR 0.85 (0.79-0.92) 1344-219 0

# Events Total Primary Endpoint Events 3000 2714 Total Events RR 0.82 (95%CI 0.75-0.90) P<0.001 2000 1151 Additional Events RR 0.74 (0.65-0.85) 2192 848-522 -303 1000 1563 1st Event HR 0.85 (0.79-0.92) 1344-219 0

Primary Endpoint Events: Wei, Lin, Weissfeld Model HR (95% CI) 1 Event (n=2907) 2 Events (n=1333) 3 Events (n=373) 4+ Events (n=152) HR 0.60 0.4 1.0 Better HR 0.76 HR 0.74 HR 0.85 Better

Events per 1,000 Patients Total Primary Endpoint Events Number of Events Prevented for 1,000 Patients Treated with for 3 Years 0 0-20 -22-40 -60 First Event Only

Events per 1,000 Patients Total Primary Endpoint Events Number of Events Prevented for 1,000 Patients Treated with for 3 Years 0-20 -22-40 -60 First Event Only -52 Total Events

CV Death, MI or Stroke CV Death, MI or Stroke FOURIER subanalysis PAD CV Death, MI or stroke in patients with and without PAD CV Death, MI or stroke in patients with PAD and no MI or stroke 14% 12% 10% PAD N=3,642 27% RRR HR 0.73 (0.59; 0.91) P=0.0040 13,0% PAD 3,5% ARR NNT 2.5y 29 14% 12% 10% PAD (no MI/stroke, N=1505) 43% RRR HR 0.57 (0.38; 0.88) P=0.0095 10,3% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% No PAD N=23,922 HR 0.81 95%CI (0.73; 0.90) P<0.001 P-interaction = 0.41 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from randomization 9,5% 7,6% 6,2% No PAD 1,4% ARR NNT 2.5y 72 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from randomization 5,5% PAD 4,8% ARR NNT 2.5y 21 Outcome HR 95%CI MACE 0.57 (0.38; 0.88) CV death 0.78 (0.39; 1.57) MI 0.66 (0.38; 1.14) Stroke 0.30 (0.11; 0.82) Bonaca M LBS-02 Bonaca M et al, Circulation 2017;137. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032235 13 Congress Update Cardiovascular AHA 2017

Major, adverse limb events FOURIER subanalysis PAD Major adverse limb events 0,5% 0,4% All patients N=27,564 42% RRR HR 0.58 (0.38; 0.88) P=0.0093 0,45% 0,3% 0,2% 0,27% 0,1% 0,0% 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 Days from randomization Outcome HR 95%CI MALE 0.58 (0.38; 0.88) ALI or major amputation 0.52 0.31; 0.89 ALI 0.55 0.31; 0.97 Major amputation 0.57 0.17; 1.95 Urgent revascularization 0.69 0.38; 1.26 Bonaca M LBS-02 Bonaca M et al, Circulation 2017;137. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032235 14 Congress Update Cardiovascular AHA 2017

CV death, MI, or stroke FOURIER subanalysis history of MI results Benefit of EvoMab based on time from qualifying MI Benefit of EvoMab based on multivessel disease Qualifying MI <2 years ago Qualifying MI 2 years ago Multivessel disease No multivessel disease 12% 10% 8% 6% 24% RRR HR 0.76 (95%CI 0.64; 0.89) P<0.001 10,8% 2.9% NNT 35 7,9% 12% 10% 8% 6% 13% RRR HR 0.87 (95%CI 0.76; 0.99) P<0.04 9.3% 8.3% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 30% RRR HR 0.70 (95%CI 0.58; 0.84) P<0.001 12.6% 3.4% NNT 29 9.2% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 11% RRR HR 0.89 (95%CI 0.79; 1.00) P<0.055 8.9% 4% 2% 4% 2% 1.0% NNT 101 4% 2% 4% 2% 7.6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.3% NNT 78 P interaction =0.18 P interaction = 0.03 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months after randomization 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months after randomization 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 15 Sabatine MS LBS-02 Congress Update Cardiovascular AHA 2017

Summary Addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab to statin therapy improved clinical outcomes with reductions in total primary endpoint events Driven by reductions in MI, stroke, and coronary revascularization Taking into account total events more than doubled the number of events prevented with evolocumab compared with first events only Patients with PAD experienced the greatest benefit from evolocumab treatment