Cancer Registrars: Beyond the Abstract

Similar documents
CALIFORNIA CANCER REGISTRARS ASSOCIATION JOB BUREAU September Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center Burbank, CA

Making the Most of Your Cancer Registry

Required Documents for 2018 Survey Application Record

Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. Reminder:

Commission on Cancer Updates

Tools, Reports, and Resources

COMMISSION ON CANCER. Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. v 1.2.1

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

RQRS: From Idea to Reality

Overview FLORIDA CANCER DATA SYSTEM

Leveraging Your Cancer Registry: A Strategy for Survey Success

Collaborative Stage Transition Newsletter March 18, 2014

2018 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE: WHAT S NEW IN STAGING FOR 2018?

Evolution of CoC within ACoS. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Current Activities and Future Initiatives November 5,2005

NCDB Vendor Webinar: NCDB Call for Data January 2018 and Upcoming RQRS Revisions

PRINCIPLES OF ONCOLOGY FOR CANCER REGISTRY PROFESSIONALS SYLLABUS AND OBJECTIVES

FORDS to STORE: The Evolution of Cancer Registry Coding Frederick L. Greene, MD FACS Medical Director, Cancer Data Services Levine Cancer Institute

Breast Cancer Additional Reports

2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules

Shore Medical Center Site-Specific Study: Colorectal Cancer 2013

General Information. Please silence cell phones. Locations Restrooms to the left of the ballroom, or to your right by the elevators

Cancer Program 2017 Annual Report

Breast Cancer Additional Reports

2015 Patient Outcomes Report

Cancer as a Disease. Linda D. Rego, CTR March 2009

CHAPTER 7 SECTION 24.1 PHASE I, PHASE II, AND PHASE III CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS TRICARE POLICY MANUAL M, AUGUST 1, 2002 MEDICINE

Sources of Consequence Data Related to Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs (National and Local)

Education & Training Plan FCDS Webcast Series Anatomic Staging Focus

Update of Cancer Programs. Scott H. Kurtzman, MD FACS

Dianne M. Cleveland, RHIA, CTR September Senior National Compliance Manager CLIMBING THE LADDER TO SUCCESS

Setting the Standard: NPCR and SEER Join Forces to Establish Data Quality Benchmarks

The Current Landscape of Nurse Navigators: Oncology and the Impact on Outcomes

2018 First Edition. NEWSCLiPs. An Update for Cancer Liaison Physicians from the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons

NONE. Disclosures. Accreditation Update

e. For the purposes of this instruction the terms cancer and tumor are considered interchangeable.

!"#$ Oncology Outcomes Report

2018 CANCER PROGRAMS CONFERENCE PROSPECTUS LEARN INTERACT TRANSFORM. facs.org/cancerconference SEPTEMBER 5 7, 2018 CHICAGO, IL

North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR)

Standards Deficiency Resolution

Education & Training Plan

The Commission on Cancer: Reengineering the National Cancer Data Base

RHODE ISLAND CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Review and Impact of the NCDB PUF. Moderator: Sandra Wong, MD, MS, FACS, FASCO

Chapter 18 Section 2. EXPIRED - Department Of Defense (DoD) Cancer Prevention And Treatment Clinical Trials Demonstration

FCDS TENTATIVE V11 TO V11.1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

Practice Analysis and Content Specifications. for Registered Radiologist Assistant

Community Comprehensive Cancer Program at Swedish Covenant Hospital 2009 Annual Report reflecting 2008 statistical data

Collaborative Stage Transition Newsletter August 18, 2014

Who What When Where Why. Case Finding 5 W s. NAACCR Webinar Series. Presented by: Joyce L. Jones, CTR Professional Registry Services, LLC

Language Access Services Policy and Health Care Interpreters. David Cardona, MD, MPH Language Access Services Coordinator

Potential Cancer Registrar

Presentation for DHSS 14 September Senior Statistician

2016 Oncology Institute Annual Report

ON-LINE REGISTRATION FCDS MONOGRAPH: 2004 ADMISSIONS (TOTAL), ANALYTIC CASES ONLY FLORIDA ANNUAL CANCER REPORT: 2001 INCIDENCE

American College of Surgeons 2014 Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons.

NAACCR WEBINAR: ABSTRACTING THYROID/LARYNX CANCER INCIDENCE FLORIDA: PEDIATRIC CANCER ADMISSIONS (TOTAL), ANALYTIC CASES ONLY FCDS REGISTER VOL.

Webinar 1 (8/26/10, 2pm EDT): COMPUTERS Webinar 2 (9/2/10, 2pm EDT): Stats & Epidemiology Webinar 3 (9/9/10, 2pm EDT): CTR Exam Tips

NCDB Special Study: Post-Active Treatment Surveillance in Prostate Cancer. Project Overview Ronald C. Chen, MD MPH

OSCaR UPDATE. Manager s Update Donald Shipley, MS. Oregon State Cancer Registry

CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I

National Cancer Peer Review Programme

MODEL JOB DESCRIPTION: ADVANCED SONOGRAPHER

2017 CANCER COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT

Working Together to Improve Cancer Outcomes. The American Cancer Society and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer

GATRA/GCCR Fall Conference 14 16, /13/2012. Integration of the Rapid Quality Reporting. System (RQRS) and Patient Navigation

Boot Camp /5/15

National Accreditation Program For Breast Centers Standards Manual 2017 EDITION. makes a difference ACCREDITATION

There is no longer a non-reportable list of terms. If a term you are looking for does not appear on this list, the case is NOT reportable.

POSITION DESCRIPTION

NEWSLETTER CANCER REGISTRARS ASSOCIATION OF NEW ENGLAND A MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT. Volume 11, Issue 2 Summer

Annual Report. Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care.

QOPI and the Rapid Learning Oncology Care System. Copyright 2011 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved 1

Scope of Practice for the Diagnostic Ultrasound Professional

Meeting CoC Standards

Overview...3. Cancer Program.4. Breast Cancer with 5-year Survival Analysis...6. Systemic Therapy.7. Stage of Breast Cancer Diagnosed in

Cancer Center Dashboard

A CENTRAL REGISTRY RELIABILITY STUDY

COMMUNITY CANCER PROGRAM ACCREDITATION WITH COMMENDATION BY THE COMMISION ON CANCER

2013 A nnual R eport

NAPBC Standards. Continuum of Care for Breast Abnormalities. NAPBC Standards Manual. Cindy Burgin #70

GUIDELINES FOR ICD O 3 HISTOLOGY CODE AND BEHAVIOR UPDATE IMPLEMENTATION Effective January 1, 2018

Explaining Blanks and X, Ambiguous Terminology and Support for AJCC Staging

Chapter 1. Introduction to Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) GOALS

Survivorship Clinics in Community Cancer Centers

Explaining Blanks and X, Ambiguous Terminology and Support for AJCC Staging

Evidence as a Tactic to Advance Pediatric Palliative Care

Stephen C. Joseph, M.D., M.P.H.

Elizabeth Rausch-Phung, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Bureau of Immunization

University Outcomes: Effective Communicators, Skilled Professionals, Disciple Leaders, Engaged Citizen

Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts

2016 Cancer Registry Annual Report

Notes for slide 2 Welcome to today s training webinar. We appreciate everyone taking time today to hear our presentations. We are very excited to fina

Cancer Registry Education and Training Resources 2004

2015 Public Outcomes Report Cancer Program Practice Profile Reports 2013 Breast and Colon Cancer

Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC 20510

2015 Cancer Program Public Report

7/29/ Education & Training Plan FCDS Webcast Series and VoIP Audio. Outline Education & Training Plan

NAACCR 2018 IMPLEMENTATION WEBINAR

FluSafe: Tool for Tracking Healthcare Worker Immunizations in IIS

Transcription:

Cancer Registrars: Beyond the Abstract Presented by Melissa Smith, RHIT, CTR Director of Client Services CHAMPS Oncology

Objectives Identify what is a Certified Tumor Registrar (CTR) and how someone becomes a CTR through education and credentialing Discuss the traditional role the Cancer Registrar holds in the hospital setting Discuss the new, emerging roles that Cancer Registrars can pursue with the skill set of a CTR 2

History of Cancer Registration 1629 1728 1913 1923 Bills of Mortality (England) General Cancer Census (London) Cancer Campaign Committee (ACoS, Chicago) Bone Sarcoma Registry (U.S.) 3

History of Cancer Registries, U.S. 1926 1935 & 1946 1956 1971 First hospital registry at Yale-New Haven Hospital in New Haven, CT First central cancer registries (Connecticut and California) American College of Surgeons requires a cancer registry for approved cancer programs. National Cancer Act budgets monies to the National Cancer Institute for research, detection and treatment of cancer. 4

History of Cancer Registries, U.S. 1973 1992 1993 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program of NCI establishes the first national cancer registry Congress establishes a National Program of Cancer Registries (Public Law 102-515) State laws make cancer a reportable disease 5

What is a Cancer Registrar? Data management experts in oncology Provides the complete summary of a cancer, from diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Ensures that timely, accurate, and complete data is captured and recorded for each patient and primary cancer Works with cancer team and hospital administration to gather cancer data and disseminate cancer information as needed 6

What is a CTR? First exam administered in 1983 The first certification exam for cancer (tumor) registry professionals Certified Tumor Registrar Developed by the NCRA (registered trademarks of NCRA) Promotes standardization in the collection and use of cancer data through examination and certification of cancer registrars and other cancer data specialists 7

Why a CTR? Simply put, oncology is a complex field, more so now than ever before Therefore oncology data is more complex 8

Where we have come: 1994 2012 Cancer Registry Coding Manuals 9

Why a CTR? (con t) Promotes excellence in the profession Establish a standard of knowledge and experience required Measure each individual on these established standards Promote professional growth and individual study by registrars Formally recognize registrars who meet the CTR requirements Assisting employers and others in the assessment of cancer registrars Required to be an abstractor at a CoCapproved program 10

How does one become a CTR? Two main eligibility routes for the CTR exam: Route A: Experience & CIM Program Route B: Experience & Associate Degree Complete a NCRA- Accredited Associate Degree or Formal Education Have an Associate Degree including 2 semesters of Human A & P Work practicum of 160 hours in a CTRstaffed cancer registry Work 1 year full time (1950 hrs) in the cancer registry field http://www.ctrexam.org/eligibility/index.htm 11

How does one become a CTR? CTR Exam 3 testing windows (March/June/Oct) CTR Exam Content Open Book: Data collection Closed book: More data collection, quality assurance, data usage, and more Full outline of content: http://bit.ly/ctrexambp 225 questions, 4 hours total Part 1 closed book, 180 items, max 2.5 hours Part 2 open book, 45 items, minimum 1.5 hours http://www.ctrexam.org/exam 12

Life of the Traditional Hospital Registrar Typical work that a cancer registrar may be responsible for in the hospital setting 13

Life of the Hospital Registrar Casefinding Suspense System Maintenance Case Abstracting Follow-up Data for Studies/Reports Cancer Conferences and Committee (CoC) 14

Casefinding The process of locating every patient who is diagnosed and/or treated at the hospital Inpatient and outpatient Reportable diagnoses only Active vs. Passive casefinding methods Registry personnel reviewing documents Departments/providers reporting to the registry Results in large list for review 15

Suspense System After casefinding, cases that are potentially reportable are placed into suspense. Basic information entered into the registry software: Demographics, date of first contact or diagnosis, primary site, histology From this list is where workload for abstracting is generated Is it reportable? Has it been reported? 16

Case Abstracting Bread and Butter of the Cancer Registry Remember junk in, junk out Organizing, summarizing, & categorizing the crucial information about a patient s cancer From diagnosis, treatment, recurrence, outcomes Tracking the cancer, not just each encounter From ANY source Internal sources, physician offices, other facilities Summary Abstract samples 17

Follow-Up Primary purpose is to monitor outcomes of cancer and its treatments Patients are followed until they expire Outcome data enable researchers to assess clinical standards, quality of care and survival "The main purpose of patient follow-up is to determine if the treatment worked." Dr. E. A. Codman, Founding Member of the American College of Surgeons 20

Data from the Cancer Registry Data can be pulled from the registry for many reasons Institutional research Physician studies - quality of care Marketing demographic data for targeted mailings, what patients are going elsewhere for treatment Data sent to reporting agencies State population registries National Cancer Data Base (CoC) Regional registries 21

*Cancer Conferences & Committee Multidisciplinary case presentation Discuss treatment options, new drugs, etc. Physicians, nurses, allied health professionals Cancer Conferences or Tumor Board The engine behind the cancer program Directs cancer resources and energies for the year Monitors compliance with CoC-accreditation standards Cancer Committee *CoC Approved 22

Cancer Registry Management Job Descriptions Cancer Registry Software Policy and Procedure Manual Quality Control of Data Confidentiality and Release of Information Retention of Documents 23

Life Outside the Traditional Setting Exploring some of the alternative projects and workplaces for CTRs 24

Opportunities for Cancer Registrars There are great and many opportunities for cancer registrars in the hospital and hospital setting. But then what what else is there? Let s find out! 25

Resource Planning Analyst Just one job title for doing everything else Database management Assisting with reports Data clean-up Registry software updates Working with specialized researchers More like an epidemiologist vs. cancer registrar Working with specialized/site specific registries NCCN databases for specific sites 26

Quality & Information Specialist Concentrates on ensuring highquality data Performs QA on cancer registrars Performs QA on hospital registry data Education & Training Educate those areas where QA falls short Provides data/information as needed Helps develop reports for questions being asked of the data 27

Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS) Commission on Cancer Program Reporting and quality improvement tool Promote evidenced based cancer care at the local level Real-Time Data Abstracts for the primary sites (breast, colon, rectum) are completed concurrently Data uploaded regularly (at least quarterly) Real Time Data & Comparisons Once data is uploaded, it s updated within 24 hours to the database Compare data to self, to others (benchmark) 28

Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS) Even though it s only 3 primary sites now looking at other disease sites to expand to Lung Stomach Prostate Registrars need to be proficient in these primaries, standard treatment protocol, and how/where to find the data needed New staff hired to complete these cases only Used to be just retroactive data (CP3R) 29

Accreditation Specialists Cancer program accreditation is complex ACoS Commission on Cancer (CoC) National Accreditation Program of Breast Centers (NAPBC) Cancer Registrars know and live the standards become the go-to person for tracking and guiding standard implementation At the facility level 30

Commission on Cancer Consultant Trained consultant team available for CoC programs or programs in process Provide services towards accreditation External assessment of standard compliance Survey readiness evaluation Complete mock surveys Assist with program development for new programs Strength and weakness evaluation Review of cancer registry operations http://www.facs.org/cancer/consultant.html 31

Central Cancer Registries State Central Registries Capture all the cancer incidence in a geographical area vs. by diagnosing or treating hospital. DoD and VAMC Central Registries Based on specific populations vs. geographical area Incidence only vs. multipurpose One time reporting vs. treatment, follow-up etc. 32

Vendors Cancer registry software is very specific Sales staff Companies use CTRs for help think super user Who better to sell a cancer registry software to a cancer registry? Why a CTR of course! Help registrars get the most out of the software Train new clients Help clients use reports, query systems, etc. Edits and abstracting questions 33

Standard Setters The groups behind the code books, creating data standards and education on how to code and follow the manuals. Places include: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) National Institutes of Health (NIH) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Collaborative Staging Task Force 34

Special Data Abstraction Think of the clinical data abstractors Permedion, other QIO organizations Typically nurses Projects tracking compliance with standard quality of care measures Site specific or clinical research specific registries Now these are branching into oncology measures AND being tied to reimbursement Finally Cancer Registry CAN be a revenue generating department! 35

Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI ) Oncologist-led, practice-based QI program VERY different take from the hospital setting Promote excellence in cancer care Promote culture of self-exam and improvement Measurement, feedback, improvement tools for hematology-oncology practices Abstracting key items out of the office chart Review documentation for completeness on: Distress screenings, pain, treatment summary, etc. (Items that CTRs are familiar with) 36

Summary Cancer registrars and the CTR certification Important for ensuring highquality data High quality of employable registrars for the future Traditional hospital registrars Gathering data at the front lines Tracking cancer from diagnosis to death Working towards managing the registry and the cancer program Non-Traditional cancer registrars Analysts in the hospital setting for accreditation and quality Working for vendors and standard setters to create guidance for others Seeing the potential in new abstracting opportunities with QI and physicians 39

Resources Cancer Registry Management: Principles & Practice National Cancer Registrars Association 2 nd Ed, 2004 (there is now a 3 rd Ed available) http://www.ncra-usa.org NCRA Council on Certification http://www.ctrexam.org/ SEER Training Modules http://training.seer.cancer.gov 40

For More Information Melissa Smith, RHIT, CTR Director of Client Services CHAMPS Oncology 216.255.3747 melissa.smith@chanet.org Join the Discussion on Our Blog CHAMPS Oncology Outlook www.oncologyoutlook.com champsoncology.com 41